Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Partnerships. Vertical Integration Efforts in Ohio. Stu Davis, Administrator Enterprise Shared Services Service Delivery Division Office of Information Technology. 2005 Ohio GIS. Lessons Learned. Currency Is Imperative - Worth building, worth maintaining - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
PartnershipsPartnerships
Vertical Integration Efforts in Ohio
Stu Davis, Administrator
Enterprise Shared Services
Service Delivery Division
Office of Information Technology
2005 Ohio GIS
Lessons LearnedLessons Learned
• Currency Is Imperative - Worth building, worth Currency Is Imperative - Worth building, worth maintainingmaintaining
• Accuracy Is Crucial - Must support all levels of Accuracy Is Crucial - Must support all levels of governmentgovernment
• Interoperability – Interoperability – Datasets built on common spatial framework
• Cooperative efforts for data acquisition, Cooperative efforts for data acquisition, development and sharing development and sharing
Integration and Collaboration - Only way to Integration and Collaboration - Only way to prepare for Ohio’s futureprepare for Ohio’s future
OGRIP OGRIP Ohio Geographically Referenced Information Ohio Geographically Referenced Information
ProgramProgram
• The authorized GIS coordinating body for State and local The authorized GIS coordinating body for State and local government GIS activity government GIS activity
• Communicate geographic activities Communicate geographic activities
• Promote cooperative efforts for data acquisition, Promote cooperative efforts for data acquisition, development and data sharingdevelopment and data sharing
• Coordinate geographic information resourcesCoordinate geographic information resources
• Foster education/awareness of GISFoster education/awareness of GIS
The World According to Stu:The World According to Stu:
What is Vertical Integration? What is Vertical Integration?
The ability to create or develop “anything” that The ability to create or develop “anything” that meets a common need and supports multiple meets a common need and supports multiple levels of government. levels of government.
Vertically integrated entities – levels of government are united through a hierarchy and we share a common interest in the data. Each member of the hierarchy may produce a different product, and the products combine to satisfy a common need or objective.
Federal Level AppsFederal Level AppsPrograms Programs Regional multi-state Regional multi-state Minimum AttributesMinimum AttributesLow ResolutionLow ResolutionLeast $$Least $$
Coarse Detail
Local Level AppsLocal Level AppsServe People Serve People Multi-Neighborhood Multi-Neighborhood More AttributesMore AttributesHigher ResolutionHigher ResolutionMost (BIG) $$$$Most (BIG) $$$$
Less detailed dataLess detailed data
State Level AppsState Level AppsState & Federal Programs State & Federal Programs Multi-County Multi-StateMulti-County Multi-StateLess AttributesLess AttributesLower ResolutionLower ResolutionMore $$$More $$$
IInntteeggrraat t iioonn
More detailed dataMore detailed data
Benefits of Vertical IntegrationBenefits of Vertical IntegrationGeographic Data SharingGeographic Data SharingGeographic Data SharingGeographic Data Sharing
Internal GIS UseInternal GIS UseInternal GIS UseInternal GIS Use
• more effective use of dollarsmore effective use of dollars
• develop applications fasterdevelop applications faster
• improve customer satisfactionimprove customer satisfaction
• provide better decision-makingprovide better decision-making
• utilize data produced by othersutilize data produced by others
• extend analysis beyond jurisdictions extend analysis beyond jurisdictions
• resolve problems created by conflicting dataresolve problems created by conflicting data
• redirect resources associated with duplicationredirect resources associated with duplication
• reduce dissemination costs by direct accessreduce dissemination costs by direct access
• provide a foundation for others to build uponprovide a foundation for others to build upon
•Develop solid GIS foundationDevelop solid GIS foundation
•Sustained and maintained foundationSustained and maintained foundation
•Interoperability - Other organizations use Interoperability - Other organizations use foundation for their specific applicationsfoundation for their specific applications
•Create Ohio enterprise-wide perspective a Create Ohio enterprise-wide perspective a community resourcecommunity resource
Collect it once - use it a bunchCollect it once - use it a bunch……. and maintain it. and maintain it
Vertical Integration Issues and Vertical Integration Issues and Challenges Challenges
• Time and MoneyTime and Money
– Funding - Leveraging State, Local and Federal Dollars for OhioFunding - Leveraging State, Local and Federal Dollars for Ohio
– Framework for interaction and partnerships – MOAs, MOUsFramework for interaction and partnerships – MOAs, MOUs
• Communication and cooperation across Jurisdictional Boundaries Communication and cooperation across Jurisdictional Boundaries
• Creation of an Ohio Enterprise-wide Perspective - Viewing issues Creation of an Ohio Enterprise-wide Perspective - Viewing issues regionally regionally
• Lack of consistent standards, multiple formats, different methods of Lack of consistent standards, multiple formats, different methods of developmentdevelopment
• Maintenance skill sets Maintenance skill sets
• Data access and distribution – Ownership and Privacy Issues, Where Data access and distribution – Ownership and Privacy Issues, Where and how do we store it…restrictions on data, etc.and how do we store it…restrictions on data, etc.
• Equitable means of supporting local government participationEquitable means of supporting local government participation
• Implementing and Maintaining a Comprehensive GIS Program for OhioImplementing and Maintaining a Comprehensive GIS Program for Ohio
Stu’s 1st Rule – Identify stakeholders and interested parties Stu’s 1st Rule – Identify stakeholders and interested parties and define relationship to the data – there must be and define relationship to the data – there must be identifiable benefits to all stakeholdersidentifiable benefits to all stakeholders
Stu’s 2nd Rule – Determine who has a vested interest in the Stu’s 2nd Rule – Determine who has a vested interest in the data – its currency, quality and accuracydata – its currency, quality and accuracy
Stu’s 3rd Rule – Determine maintenance responsibilitiesStu’s 3rd Rule – Determine maintenance responsibilities
Stu’s 4th Rule – Create a dialog between stakeholders to Stu’s 4th Rule – Create a dialog between stakeholders to establish roles, responsibilities and expectations for establish roles, responsibilities and expectations for collaborative effortscollaborative efforts
Stu’s 5Stu’s 5thth Rule – Develop a framework for working together - Rule – Develop a framework for working together - PARTNERSHIPSPARTNERSHIPS
Stu’s Five Rules of Vertical Stu’s Five Rules of Vertical IntegrationIntegration
OGRIP ForumOGRIP Forum
FRAMEWORK DATA TASKFORCESFRAMEWORK DATA TASKFORCES
Ohio Geographically Referenced Information Program
TransportationTransportation
CadastreCadastre
HydrographyHydrography
Cultural BoundariesCultural Boundaries
MonumentationMonumentation
MetadataMetadata
ImageryImagery
Digital ImageryDigital Imagery
Geodetic Geodetic Control/ElevatiControl/Elevationon
Cultural BoundariesCultural Boundaries
Hydrography –Hydrography –Surface WatersSurface Waters
Transportation Transportation
Land OwnershipLand Ownership
Other Thematic DataOther Thematic DataOther Thematic DataOther Thematic DataOhio’s Framework Ohio’s Framework DataData
Ohio’s Framework Ohio’s Framework DataData
SoilsSoils
Sewer Lines Sewer Lines
Water Lines Water Lines
LandcoverLandcover
DemographicsDemographics
Flood ZonesFlood Zones
Geodetic ControlGeodetic Control
Digital imageryDigital imagery
ElevationElevation
BoundariesBoundaries
Hydrography Hydrography
TransportationTransportation
OGRIP’s GIS Framework Concept OGRIP’s GIS Framework Concept
Build Once, Use Many Build Once, Use Many TimesTimes
OGRIP’s GIS Framework Concept OGRIP’s GIS Framework Concept
Build Once, Use Many Build Once, Use Many TimesTimes
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGIS
http://das.ohio.gov/itsd/ess/Ogrip/countyprofiles.htmhttp://das.ohio.gov/itsd/ess/Ogrip/countyprofiles.htm
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGIS Question 1.1
Q1_1
No GIS
Contemplating
Planning
Implementing
Operating
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
What is the current status of your County’s GIS?
R o s sR o s s
W o o dW o o d
S t a r kS t a r k
P i k eP i k e
S c i o t oS c i o t oA d a m sA d a m s
W a y n eW a y n e
H u r o nH u r o n
B r o w nB r o w nG a l l i aG a l l i a
S e n e c aS e n e c a
L o r a i nL o r a i n
B u t l e rB u t l e r
M e i g sM e i g s
A t h e n sA t h e n s
H e n r yH e n r y T r u m b u l lT r u m b u l l
P u t n a mP u t n a m
V i n t o nV i n t o n
H a n c o c kH a n c o c k
F u l t o nF u l t o n
E r i eE r i e
H i g h l a n dH i g h l a n d
M e d i n aM e d i n a
L u c a sL u c a s
G e a u g aG e a u g a
C l i n t o nC l i n t o n
L a k eL a k e
W i l l i a m sW i l l i a m s
P a u l d i n gP a u l d i n g
C u y a h o g aC u y a h o g a
D e f i a n c eD e f i a n c e
H a m i l t o nH a m i l t o n
S a n d u s k yS a n d u s k y
K n o xK n o x
D a r k eD a r k eL i c k i n gL i c k i n g
A l l e nA l l e n
L o g a nL o g a n
P e r r yP e r r y
C l a r kC l a r k
U n i o nU n i o n
N o b l eN o b l e
H a r d i nH a r d i n
M i a m iM i a m i
A s h t a b u l aA s h t a b u l a
M e r c e rM e r c e r
B e l m o n tB e l m o n t
P r e b l eP r e b l e
P o r t a g eP o r t a g e
F r a n k l i nF r a n k l i n
M o n r o eM o n r o e
S h e l b yS h e l b y
M u s k i n g u mM u s k i n g u m
M a r i o nM a r i o n
G r e e n eG r e e n e
W a r r e nW a r r e n
H o l m e sH o l m e s
M o r g a nM o r g a n
F a i r f i e l dF a i r f i e l d
S u m m i tS u m m i t
M a d i s o nM a d i s o n
C a r r o l lC a r r o l l
R i c h l a n dR i c h l a n d
M o r r o wM o r r o w
G u e r n s e yG u e r n s e y
W a s h i n g t o nW a s h i n g t o n
P i c k a w a yP i c k a w a y
F a y e t t eF a y e t t e
C o s h o c t o nC o s h o c t o n
A s h l a n dA s h l a n d
H o c k i n gH o c k i n g
J a c k s o nJ a c k s o nC l e r m o n tC l e r m o n t
D e l a w a r eD e l a w a r e
T u s c a r a w a sT u s c a r a w a s
L a w r e n c eL a w r e n c e
W y a n d o tW y a n d o t
H a r r i s o nH a r r i s o n
A u g l a i z eA u g l a i z e
V a n W e r tV a n W e r t
C o l u m b i a n aC o l u m b i a n a
M a h o n i n gM a h o n i n g
C r a w f o r dC r a w f o r d
J e f f e r s o nJ e f f e r s o n
C h a m p a i g nC h a m p a i g n
M o n t g o m e r yM o n t g o m e r y
O t t a w aO t t a w a
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGISQuestion 1.2
Q1_2
Centrally
Multi-participant
Other
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
Is your GIS managed:
R o s sR o s s
W o o dW o o d
S t a r kS t a r k
P i k eP i k e
S c i o t oS c i o t oA d a m sA d a m s
W a y n eW a y n e
H u r o nH u r o n
B r o w nB r o w nG a l l i aG a l l i a
S e n e c aS e n e c a
L o r a i nL o r a i n
B u t l e rB u t l e r
M e i g sM e i g s
A t h e n sA t h e n s
H e n r yH e n r y T r u m b u l lT r u m b u l l
P u t n a mP u t n a m
V i n t o nV i n t o n
H a n c o c kH a n c o c k
F u l t o nF u l t o n
E r i eE r i e
H i g h l a n dH i g h l a n d
M e d i n aM e d i n a
L u c a sL u c a s
G e a u g aG e a u g a
C l i n t o nC l i n t o n
L a k eL a k e
W i l l i a m sW i l l i a m s
P a u l d i n gP a u l d i n g
C u y a h o g aC u y a h o g a
D e f i a n c eD e f i a n c e
H a m i l t o nH a m i l t o n
S a n d u s k yS a n d u s k y
K n o xK n o x
D a r k eD a r k eL i c k i n gL i c k i n g
A l l e nA l l e n
L o g a nL o g a n
P e r r yP e r r y
C l a r kC l a r k
U n i o nU n i o n
N o b l eN o b l e
H a r d i nH a r d i n
M i a m iM i a m i
A s h t a b u l aA s h t a b u l a
M e r c e rM e r c e r
B e l m o n tB e l m o n t
P r e b l eP r e b l e
P o r t a g eP o r t a g e
F r a n k l i nF r a n k l i n
M o n r o eM o n r o e
S h e l b yS h e l b y
M u s k i n g u mM u s k i n g u m
M a r i o nM a r i o n
G r e e n eG r e e n e
W a r r e nW a r r e n
H o l m e sH o l m e s
M o r g a nM o r g a n
F a i r f i e l dF a i r f i e l d
S u m m i tS u m m i t
M a d i s o nM a d i s o n
C a r r o l lC a r r o l l
R i c h l a n dR i c h l a n d
M o r r o wM o r r o w
G u e r n s e yG u e r n s e y
W a s h i n g t o nW a s h i n g t o n
P i c k a w a yP i c k a w a y
F a y e t t eF a y e t t e
C o s h o c t o nC o s h o c t o n
A s h l a n dA s h l a n d
H o c k i n gH o c k i n g
J a c k s o nJ a c k s o nC l e r m o n tC l e r m o n t
D e l a w a r eD e l a w a r e
T u s c a r a w a sT u s c a r a w a s
L a w r e n c eL a w r e n c e
W y a n d o tW y a n d o t
H a r r i s o nH a r r i s o n
A u g l a i z eA u g l a i z e
V a n W e r tV a n W e r t
C o l u m b i a n aC o l u m b i a n a
M a h o n i n gM a h o n i n g
C r a w f o r dC r a w f o r d
J e f f e r s o nJ e f f e r s o n
C h a m p a i g nC h a m p a i g n
M o n t g o m e r yM o n t g o m e r y
O t t a w aO t t a w a
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGISQuestion 2.2
Q2_2
No
Yes
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
Do any of your applications utilize data that extend beyond your County boundaries?
R o s sR o s s
S t a r kS t a r k
P i k eP i k e
S c i o t oS c i o t oA d a m sA d a m s
W a y n eW a y n e
B r o w nB r o w nG a l l i aG a l l i a
B u t l e rB u t l e r
M e i g sM e i g s
A t h e n sA t h e n s
V i n t o nV i n t o nH i g h l a n dH i g h l a n d
C l i n t o nC l i n t o n H o c k i n gH o c k i n g
H a m i l t o nH a m i l t o n
W o o dW o o d
K n o xK n o x
D a r k eD a r k eL i c k i n gL i c k i n g
H u r o nH u r o n
A l l e nA l l e n
S e n e c aS e n e c a
L o g a nL o g a n
P e r r yP e r r y
L o r a i nL o r a i n
C l a r kC l a r k
U n i o nU n i o n
H e n r yH e n r y T r u m b u l lT r u m b u l l
N o b l eN o b l e
H a r d i nH a r d i n
M i a m iM i a m i
A s h t a b u l aA s h t a b u l a
M e r c e rM e r c e r
B e l m o n tB e l m o n t
P u t n a mP u t n a m
P r e b l eP r e b l e
P o r t a g eP o r t a g e
F r a n k l i nF r a n k l i n
H a n c o c kH a n c o c k
F u l t o nF u l t o n
M o n r o eM o n r o e
E r i eE r i e
S h e l b yS h e l b y
M e d i n aM e d i n a
M u s k i n g u mM u s k i n g u m
M a r i o nM a r i o n
L u c a sL u c a s
G r e e n eG r e e n e
W a r r e nW a r r e n
H o l m e sH o l m e s
M o r g a nM o r g a n
F a i r f i e l dF a i r f i e l d
S u m m i tS u m m i t
M a d i s o nM a d i s o n
C a r r o l lC a r r o l l
R i c h l a n dR i c h l a n d
M o r r o wM o r r o w
G u e r n s e yG u e r n s e y
G e a u g aG e a u g a
W a s h i n g t o nW a s h i n g t o n
P i c k a w a yP i c k a w a y
F a y e t t eF a y e t t e
C o s h o c t o nC o s h o c t o n
A s h l a n dA s h l a n d
J a c k s o nJ a c k s o n
L a k eL a k e
C l e r m o n tC l e r m o n t
D e l a w a r eD e l a w a r e
W i l l i a m sW i l l i a m s
T u s c a r a w a sT u s c a r a w a s
L a w r e n c eL a w r e n c e
W y a n d o tW y a n d o t
P a u l d i n gP a u l d i n g
C u y a h o g aC u y a h o g a
D e f i a n c eD e f i a n c e
H a r r i s o nH a r r i s o n
A u g l a i z eA u g l a i z e
V a n W e r tV a n W e r t
C o l u m b i a n aC o l u m b i a n a
M a h o n i n gM a h o n i n g
C r a w f o r dC r a w f o r d
S a n d u s k yS a n d u s k y
J e f f e r s o nJ e f f e r s o n
C h a m p a i g nC h a m p a i g n
M o n t g o m e r yM o n t g o m e r y
O t t a w aO t t a w a
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGIS Question 3.1
Q3_1
No
Contemplating
Planning
Implementing
Yes
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
Is GIS data accessable via Web?
Ross
Stark
Darke
Knox
Licking
WayneAllen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Logan
Union
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Fairfield Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Richland
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
WyandotVan WertColumbiana
Crawford
Champaign
Wood
Pike
SciotoAdamsGallia
Huron
Lorain
Brown
Seneca
Meigs
Trumbull
Athens
Henry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Vinton
Fulton
Putnam
Highland
Hancock
Medina
Lucas
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
JacksonClermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Hamilton
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGISQuestion 3.7
Q3_7
No
Yes
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
Would your County be willing to share your data for the purposes of a State-wide data clearinghouse
Ross
Stark
Darke
Knox
Licking
WayneAllen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Logan
Union
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Fairfield Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Richland
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
WyandotVan WertColumbiana
Crawford
Champaign
Wood
Pike
SciotoAdamsGallia
Huron
Lorain
Brown
Seneca
Meigs
Trumbull
Athens
Henry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Vinton
Fulton
Putnam
Highland
Hancock
Medina
Lucas
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
JacksonClermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Hamilton
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
For the purpose of a Statewide Spatial Data Portal
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGIS
Question 6a.5
Q6_5
1 ft
1 ft, 1/2`
1 ft, 2 ft
2 ft
6 in
6 in, 1 ft
6 in, 1 ft, 2 ft
6 in, 1 ft, 2 ft, 4 - 8 obliques
6 in, 2 ft
~1M
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
Pixel Resolution of your most recent project
Ross
Stark
Pike
Darke
Knox
Scioto
Licking
Adams
Wayne
Gallia
Allen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Brown
Logan
Union
Meigs
Athens
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Vinton
Fairfield
Highland
Hancock
Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Jackson
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
Wyandot
Hamilton
Van Wert
ColumbianaCrawford
Champaign
Wood
Huron
Lorain
Seneca
TrumbullHenry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Fulton
Putnam
Medina
Lucas
Richland
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
Clermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGISThe GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
Date of your most recent imagery?
Ross
Stark
Darke
Knox
Licking
WayneAllen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Logan
Union
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Fairfield Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Richland
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
WyandotVan WertColumbiana
Crawford
Champaign
Wood
Pike
SciotoAdamsGallia
Huron
Lorain
Brown
Seneca
Meigs
Trumbull
Athens
Henry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Vinton
Fulton
Putnam
Highland
Hancock
Medina
Lucas
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
JacksonClermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Hamilton
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
Apr 2005 Mar 2002
Apr 1996
Apr 2003
Apr 1994
Apr 2004
Apr 2004Apr 2001
Nov 1996
Apr 1989
Mar 2001
Mar 2000
Apr 2003
Apr 1996
Apr 2005
Apr 2002
Mar 2001
Mar 2005
Mar 2005
Jul 1994
Apr 2003
Mar 2003
Apr 2004
Apr 2003
Mar 2004
Apr 2005
Apr 2003Apr 2003
Apr 2001
Apr 2003 Apr 2005
May 1999
Mar 2001
Mar 2000
May 2002
Apr 2003
Nov 1998
Apr 1999
Mar 2001
Apr 2003
May 2000
Apr 2002
Apr 2002Jan 1988
May 2002
Apr 2003
Apr 2002
Mar 1995
Apr 1998
Apr 2001
Apr 2000
Apr 1998
Apr 2000
Apr 2001
Apr 2000
Apr 2002 Apr 2000
Apr 2001
Apr 2000
Apr 2003
Feb 2002
Apr 2004
Apr 2002
Apr 2005
Apr 2004
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGIS Question 9.18
Q9_18
Auditors
Auditors, GIS
Auditors, Engineers
Auditors, Engineers, GIS
Engineers
engineer`s office
Question 9.18Q9_18
Auditors
Auditors, GIS
Auditors, Engineers
Auditors, Engineers, GIS
Engineers
engineer`s office
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
Which office is responsible for parcel maintnenance (recordkeeping)?
Ross
Stark
Darke
Knox
Licking
WayneAllen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Logan
Union
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Fairfield Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Richland
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
WyandotVan WertColumbiana
Crawford
Champaign
Wood
Pike
SciotoAdamsGallia
Huron
Lorain
Brown
Seneca
Meigs
Trumbull
Athens
Henry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Vinton
Fulton
Putnam
Highland
Hancock
Medina
Lucas
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
JacksonClermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Hamilton
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGIS
Question 9.19
Q9_19
Auditors
Auditors, Engineers
Engineers
Engineers, CIO
Engineers, GIS
Still Mylar-based
engineer`s office
GIS
GIS Office
Question 9.19Q9_19
Auditors
Auditors, Engineers
Engineers
Engineers, CIO
Engineers, GIS
Still Mylar-based
engineer`s office
GIS
GIS Office
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
Which office is responsible for GIS maintnenance of parcels (linework)?
Ross
Stark
Darke
Knox
Licking
WayneAllen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Logan
Union
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Fairfield Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Richland
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
WyandotVan WertColumbiana
Crawford
Champaign
Wood
Pike
SciotoAdamsGallia
Huron
Lorain
Brown
Seneca
Meigs
Trumbull
Athens
Henry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Vinton
Fulton
Putnam
Highland
Hancock
Medina
Lucas
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
JacksonClermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Hamilton
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGIS Question 6a.11
Q6_11
Created new from photogrammetric processes
Don't know
LIDAR
Used existing - updated from previous project
Used existing USGS DEM
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
What source was used in creating the DEM or DTM?
Ross
Stark
Wood
Pike
Darke
Knox
Scioto
Licking
Adams
Wayne
Gallia
Huron
Allen
Butler
Lorain
Perry
Clark
Brown
Seneca
Logan
Union
Meigs
Trumbull
Athens
Hardin
Henry
Ashtabula
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Portage
Erie
Vinton
Fulton
Putnam
Fairfield
Highland
Hancock
Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Medina
Muskingum
Greene
Lucas
ClintonWarren
Richland
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Summit
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Geauga
Coshocton
Hocking
Jackson
Williams
Delaware
Lake
Harrison
Defiance
Paulding
Lawrence
Auglaize
Wyandot
Hamilton
Van Wert
Cuyahoga
Columbiana
Crawford
Mahoning
Sandusky
Champaign
Ottawa
Ashland
Clermont
TuscarawasJefferson
Montgomery
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGIS Question 7.1
Q7_1
Contemplating
Implementing
No Centerlines
Operating
Planning
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
What is the current status of road centerline data in your County?
Ross
Stark
Darke
Knox
Licking
WayneAllen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Logan
Union
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Fairfield Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Richland
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
WyandotVan WertColumbiana
Crawford
Champaign
Wood
Pike
SciotoAdamsGallia
Huron
Lorain
Brown
Seneca
Meigs
Trumbull
Athens
Henry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Vinton
Fulton
Putnam
Highland
Hancock
Medina
Lucas
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
JacksonClermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Hamilton
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGIS Question 7.5
Q7_5
Annually
Monthly
Quarterly
Semi-annually
Weekly
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
How often are the addresses and addressranges maintained and updated?
Ross
Stark
Darke
Knox
Licking
WayneAllen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Logan
Union
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Fairfield Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Richland
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
WyandotVan WertColumbiana
Crawford
Champaign
Wood
Pike
SciotoAdamsGallia
Huron
Lorain
Brown
Seneca
Meigs
Trumbull
Athens
Henry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Vinton
Fulton
Putnam
Highland
Hancock
Medina
Lucas
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
JacksonClermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Hamilton
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGISQuestion 10.1
Q10_1
No
Yes
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
Does your organization use metadata?
Ross
Stark
Darke
Knox
Licking
WayneAllen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Logan
Union
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Fairfield Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Richland
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
WyandotVan WertColumbiana
Crawford
Champaign
Wood
Pike
SciotoAdamsGallia
Huron
Lorain
Brown
Seneca
Meigs
Trumbull
Athens
Henry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Vinton
Fulton
Putnam
Highland
Hancock
Medina
Lucas
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
JacksonClermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Hamilton
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGISQuestion 10.2
Q10_2
No
Yes
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
Is metadata accessible through your organizations website?
Ross
Stark
Darke
Knox
Licking
WayneAllen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Logan
Union
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Fairfield Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Richland
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
WyandotVan WertColumbiana
Crawford
Champaign
Wood
Pike
SciotoAdamsGallia
Huron
Lorain
Brown
Seneca
Meigs
Trumbull
Athens
Henry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Vinton
Fulton
Putnam
Highland
Hancock
Medina
Lucas
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
JacksonClermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Hamilton
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
OHIOOHIO
CCOOUUNNTTYY
GISGIS
Question 10.3
Q10_3
FDGC
FGDC
In-House maintenance standards
NMAS, ASPRS, Jefferson County
ESRI metadata tool
Projection info, how created, when, by whom
The metadata is old and did not use any standard.
Under Development
No formal standards
none
nothing hard and fast. We are just beginning to co
None to data
The GIS County Survey is an inventory of county spatial data assets and GIS activities for the State of Ohio. Responses to the survey are voluntarily provided to OGRIP from local government GIS contacts representing the counties. OIT/GISSC/2005
What metadata guidelines or standards does your organization use?
Ross
Stark
Pike
Darke
Knox
Scioto
Licking
Adams
Wayne
Gallia
Allen
Butler
Perry
Clark
Brown
Logan
Union
Meigs
Athens
Hardin
Noble
Miami
Mercer
Franklin
Preble
Belmont
Vinton
Fairfield
Highland
Hancock
Monroe
Shelby
CarrollMarion
Muskingum
Greene
ClintonWarren
Holmes
MorganFayette
Madison
Guernsey
Morrow
Washington
Pickaway
Coshocton
Hocking
Jackson
Delaware Harrison
Lawrence
Auglaize
Wyandot
Hamilton
Van Wert
ColumbianaCrawford
Champaign
Wood
Huron
Lorain
Seneca
TrumbullHenry
Ashtabula
Portage
Erie
Fulton
Putnam
Medina
Lucas
Richland
Summit
Geauga
Ashland
Clermont
Williams
Lake
Tuscarawas
Defiance
Paulding
Cuyahoga
Jefferson
Mahoning
Sandusky
Ottawa
Montgomery
Importance of ProfilesImportance of Profiles
• Provides a snapshot of GIS activities across the stateProvides a snapshot of GIS activities across the state• Support the potential for collaborative programsSupport the potential for collaborative programs• This allows us to identify commonality and build This allows us to identify commonality and build
business cases for obtaining funding to support vertical business cases for obtaining funding to support vertical integration projects.integration projects.
• The completion of the County Profiles will be tied to The completion of the County Profiles will be tied to obtaining state funding through OGRIPobtaining state funding through OGRIP
Locating information by Address
• Inconsistent Addressing information• Too many standards to choose from?• Everyone and their brother can assign addresses• No central authority• No clear maintenance responsibilities• Confidence and reliability w/results vary greatly• Legacy addressing databases
• ZIP Code is not granular enough
• Address Based
• ZIP+
kk
OGRIP/GISSC
Field Verified18955 SR-103
Interpolated18955 SR-103
Un-PostedAddresses
SR-103
SR-103
SR
-10
3
Rural Route and Box NumberRural Route and Box Number
Location Based Response System (LBRS)Location Based Response System (LBRS)
• Statewide high resolution road centerline coverageStatewide high resolution road centerline coverage
• Address ranges and site specific addressAddress ranges and site specific address• Higher confidence/increase reliability for geocodingHigher confidence/increase reliability for geocoding• Known accuracy – understanding limits of data and Known accuracy – understanding limits of data and
useuse
• Partnership with local government – not data grab!Partnership with local government – not data grab!• Memorandums of Agreement (MOAs)Memorandums of Agreement (MOAs)• Integration of state and local government databasesIntegration of state and local government databases• Updated and MaintainedUpdated and Maintained
• In a nutshell….One set of geography - Multiple attributes In a nutshell….One set of geography - Multiple attributes for different uses at all levels of governmentfor different uses at all levels of government
A new and better way of doing businessA new and better way of doing business
kk
OGRIP/GISSC
Positional Accuracy–1994 Image & 1998 Data Source
Positional Accuracy–2001 Image & Local Data
kk
LBRS Goal and ObjectivesLBRS Goal and Objectives
Goal – Goal – to create a comprehensive, consistent, accurate and maintained to create a comprehensive, consistent, accurate and maintained multi-jurisdictional statewide asset multi-jurisdictional statewide asset
Asset for Ohio - a street centerline with site-specific addresses and Asset for Ohio - a street centerline with site-specific addresses and address ranges to ensure the quick and rapid response of address ranges to ensure the quick and rapid response of emergency responders to natural and man made disasters.emergency responders to natural and man made disasters.
ObjectivesObjectives– Sustainable partnership between state and local governmentSustainable partnership between state and local government– Establishment of countywide GIS committeeEstablishment of countywide GIS committee– Establishment of a countywide LBRS sub-systemEstablishment of a countywide LBRS sub-system– Establishment of a county model for QA/QC of dataEstablishment of a county model for QA/QC of data– Development of LBRS maintenance and update proceduresDevelopment of LBRS maintenance and update procedures– Development of extract/upload of data to the GIServeOhioDevelopment of extract/upload of data to the GIServeOhio
LBRS CriteriaLBRS Criteria
• Existing GIS Activity – centerline and address developmentExisting GIS Activity – centerline and address development
• Existence of County GIS teamExistence of County GIS team
• Commitment to technologyCommitment to technology
• Commitment to a sustainable partnershipCommitment to a sustainable partnership
• Multi-Agency participation Multi-Agency participation – Auditor, Commissioners, Engineer, SheriffAuditor, Commissioners, Engineer, Sheriff– Health Director, EMA Director, E-911 CoordinatorHealth Director, EMA Director, E-911 Coordinator
• Dedicated project managerDedicated project manager
• Cooperation with E-911Cooperation with E-911
• MOA - stipulationsMOA - stipulations
• Review/acceptance of proposed scope/data specificationReview/acceptance of proposed scope/data specification
Cost & FundingCost & Funding
• Total Estimated Cost - $14.6 millionTotal Estimated Cost - $14.6 million• Total Capital Fund Request – $ 7 millionTotal Capital Fund Request – $ 7 million
• $1.5 million in FY03/04 capital funds – Approved $1.5 million in FY03/04 capital funds – Approved • $1.75 million in FY05/06 capital funds – Approved$1.75 million in FY05/06 capital funds – Approved
• Cost share – State/LocalCost share – State/Local• Equitable distribution of dollarsEquitable distribution of dollars• Haves & have-notsHaves & have-nots
• Other Funding possibilitiesOther Funding possibilities• Reallocation of state dollarsReallocation of state dollars• Federal SupportFederal Support• GrantsGrants
• Homeland SecurityHomeland Security• Public SafetyPublic Safety
kk
kk
Ohio’s LBRS
The foundation for:
• Data sharing at all levels of government
• Developing interoperable data sets
• Defining new mechanisms for collaboration
• Creating enhanced data sets for Ohio
Vertical Integration Partnerships
Ohio’s Imagery Task Force Ohio’s Imagery Task Force developed a Statewide Imagery Strategydeveloped a Statewide Imagery Strategy
Strategy looked at a variety of Solutions– Satellite Imagery Solutions
– Digital Camera Solutions
– Traditional Digital Imagery Solutions
– Spec Flight Solutions
– Existing Imagery and requirements • Local Government• State Government
– Developed a Plan
Digital Imagery SourcesDigital Imagery Sources
- Mapping/Engineering- Change Detection- Land Use/Land Cover- Inventory Analysis- Public Safety
– Land/Resource Management
– Assessment– Emergency Response– Referential Data
•Resolution – 30 meter to 3 Inch Pixels•Geo-referenced – positional accuracy•Currency – dependent upon use
Imagery supports numerous applications
10 meter SPOT 1 meter DOQQ
Resolution Examples
Resolution Examples
1 meter DOQQs 1 ft Digital Orthophoto
State and Local ImageryState and Local Imagery
Pros• Exists and available – Local and State• Higher resolution – Local• Currency – statewide coverage is at least 10 years old• LiDAR provides a solid foundation for imagery solutions • LiDAR support numerous GIS applications
Cons• Various sources and accuracies – lack of consistency - Local• Currency issues/scheduled reflys – Local and State• Various solutions used – Local • No current sustainable funding source – Local and State
Statewide Imagery ProgramStatewide Imagery Program
Statewide Imagery Program Solution – Develop a sustainable statewide imagery program for Ohio – Develop a deliverable based specification that supports state
and local government requirements– Ensure QA/QC and Acceptance program is in place – Garner multiple State Agency and Federal support (funding)
Imagery Provisioning through GIServOhio– Gather existing county imagery– Acquire US Agriculture’s NAIP Photography– MOU with Counties with clearly defined access and distribution
restrictions – Create a Imagery Repository – discovery, access and distribution
of Imagery
Statewide Imagery SolutionStatewide Imagery Solution
Coordinated Statewide Imagery Program – Finalizing Statewide Plan and RFP– Deliverable based requirements that
meet state and local government needs– Leverage existing QA/QC processes in
state and federal government– State and Local government
participation– Continue to identify funding sources
Parcel Based Initiatives and Derivative Parcel Based Initiatives and Derivative ProductsProducts
• Zip code doesn’t get us close enoughZip code doesn’t get us close enough• Address geocoding doesn’t provide the necessary Address geocoding doesn’t provide the necessary
relationships to other datarelationships to other data• New pressures for Location Determination and AnalysisNew pressures for Location Determination and Analysis
– Sex offenders Sex offenders – Foreign Animal DiseaseForeign Animal Disease– Public SafetyPublic Safety– Emergency management, Mitigation, damage Emergency management, Mitigation, damage
determination, etc.determination, etc.Cultural boundaries – derived from Parcel BoundariesCultural boundaries – derived from Parcel Boundaries– Jurisdictional boundariesJurisdictional boundaries– School district boundariesSchool district boundaries– Tax districts, etc.Tax districts, etc.
Agriculture Premise ID Project
• Federal Initiative - Compliance• Ohio Department of Agriculture (ODA) is
developing a system to identify individual animals, the premise where they are located and the date of entry to this premise.
• Establish a trace-back system that can identify all animals and premises potentially exposed to an animal with a Foreign Animal Disease (FAD) within 48 hours of discovery
Ag Premise ID
Premise ID System be implemented in 3 phases:
1) Premise Identification
2) Individual or group/lot identification of animals for interstate and intrastate commerce
3) Retrofit processing plants and markets with appropriate technology enhancing ability to track animals through the livestock marketing chain
40
17
17
Bureau of Motor Vehicles
• License Plates – capturing address at the point of entry
• Cleaning Existing Address File
• Standardizing and geocoding address
• Ensuring the associated fees are distributed to the appropriate Jurisdiction
Data Discovery, Access and DistributionData Discovery, Access and Distribution
• GIServOhio – a GIS portal for OhioGIServOhio – a GIS portal for Ohio• MetadataMetadata• Spatial AssetsSpatial Assets
– VectorVector– RasterRaster– AttributesAttributes– Profiles – description of county activities as well as a statewide Profiles – description of county activities as well as a statewide
indicatorindicator– Link to RAMONALink to RAMONA
• Potential Disaster Recovery Site for CountiesPotential Disaster Recovery Site for Counties
GIServeOhioGIServeOhioSpatial Data PortalSpatial Data Portal
EmergencyManagement
City County
Regional State
Federal Private
GIServe OHIOSpatial Data Clearinghouse
LBRS
Imagery Centerlines
Site Addresses Structures
Contours Floodplain
EMA MARCS ODH
Local Government Public DOD
Internet Mapping FTP Data Access Business Applications
Boundaries Facilities
Metadata Infrastructure
Working Together for a Better Tomorrow
• Partnership – mutually beneficial and critical to the success of spatial data development
• Vertical Integration of:– Data (interoperability)– Data Development Funding (drilling down)
– Sustainable Funding • Communication• Coordination• Cooperation• Collaboration
A better future through Partnerships
Questions
Stu DavisLane WoodJeff Smith
Enterprise Shared ServicesService Delivery Division
Ohio Office of Information Technology77 South High Street, Room 1990
Columbus, Ohio 43215614-466-4747
![Welcome to Partnerships BC - Partnerships BC - Project ...... email: partnerships@partnershipsbc.ca [6/5/2013] page 1 of 10 Project Status Overview, May 2013 Partnerships BC serves](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/5ff89c92da369a230f0396fa/welcome-to-partnerships-bc-partnerships-bc-project-email-partnerships.jpg)
