Upload
wcet
View
148
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
WCET Annual Meeting Presentation
Citation preview
WCET 2012: Partnering for Performance –
Faculty Peer Review
Session 9:30-10:45
Nancy Lindfors, Harrison College (In)Andrew Shean, Ashford University (Ca)
Moderator: Kathi Baldwin, University of Alaska, SE Sitka
WCET: Partnering for Performance –Faculty Peer Review
Leveraging a Critical Friend Model
History:
Raising the Bar for Faculty• New Tools• New Infrastructure• New Expectations• New Roles for Deans• New Definitions• New Process
Where are we?
Rollout Implementation Evaluation and Revisions
Baseline Data
Leadership Adaptability Communication
Professional/Technical Expertise
Service Orientation
Overall Rating
2.73 2.66 2.58 2.91 2.82 2.74
Leadership
Adaptbiltiy
Communication
Professional / Technical Expertise
Service Orientation
Overall Rating 7.12
2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3
Next Steps
Continue to:• promote and train critical friends• promote value of critical friends as
peer evaluators• develop deans as instructional coaches• edit and refine tools • Leverage as needs assessment to
address training and development deficits
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2.9
1.9
3.1
2.4
Round 1 Round 2
Change Comparison0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.3
0.4
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2.7
2.1
3.2
2.5
Round 1 Round 2
Change Comparison0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.450.4 0.4
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2.7
1.9
3.2
2.4
Round 1 Round 2
Change Comparison0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.4
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
3.1
2.3
3.4
2.5
Round 1 Round 2
Change Comparison0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.3
0.2
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.53.1
2.2
3.3
2.6
Round 1 Round 2
Change Comparison0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.1
0.4
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2.9
2.1
3.2
2.5
Round 1 Round 2
Change Comparison0
0.050.1
0.150.2
0.250.3
0.350.4
0.45
0.3
0.4
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Mean Score0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.53.1
2.3
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Mean Score0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 2.7
All Instructors In All Areas
All Instructors In All Areas
Targeted Professional Development
QUESTIONS/COMMENTS