34
Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles, Juan A. Aguilar [email protected] ( mailto:[email protected] ) Natural Units It is very common to see use of soi-disant natural units in HEP and HEP-Astro where . The correspondence between natural units and physical units can be established by use of and In these units there is then only one fundamental dimension: Energy and momentum, usually expressed in GeV Time and space are GeV In Heaviside-Lorentz convention = c = 1 = 6.58 × GeV ns = 1 1 GeV = 1.52 × 10 16 10 15 ns 1 c = 30.0 cm/ns = 1 30 cm = 1 ns 1 = = = 1 ϵ 0 μ 0 Z 0 α = e = 0.303 e 2 4πϵc 1 137 4πα

Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    15

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2The computational framework: Particle Physics andCosmologyUniversité Libre de Bruxelles,

Juan A. Aguilar

[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

Natural UnitsIt is very common to see use of soi-disant natural units in HEP and HEP-Astro where

. The correspondence between natural units and physical units can beestablished by use of

and

In these units there is then only one fundamental dimension:

Energy and momentum, usually expressed in GeV

Time and space are GeV

In Heaviside-Lorentz convention

ℏ = c = 1

ℏ = 6.58 × GeV ⋅ ns = 1 ⇒ 1 GeV = 1.52 ×10−16 1015 ns−1

c = 30.0 cm/ns = 1 ⇒ 30 cm = 1 ns

−1

= = = 1ϵ0 μ0 Z0

α = ≈ → e = ≈ 0.303e2

4πϵℏc1

1374πα‾ ‾‾‾√

Page 2: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Some DefinitionsThe mass of Earth, Sun, Galaxy, given in kg. For information on how to use units in astropy(http://astropy.readthedocs.org/en/latest/units/)

In [24]: import astropy.units as ufrom astropy import constants as const

M_Earth = 5.97E24 * u.kgM_Sun = 1.99E30 * u.kgM_MW = 1E12 * M_Sun#By adding the quantity u.kg you can print directly the mass in Kgprint "Mass Earth is: %s" %M_Earth

Sizes, note that the Earth is not a perfect sphere but it will not matter here. 1 A.U. is themean distance between the Earth and the Sun

In [25]: R_Earth = 6.371E6 * u.m # metersR_Sun = 6.955E8 * u.m # metersAU = 1.496E11 * u.m # meters

Calculate the mean density of Earth and Sun

In [26]: vol_sphere = lambda r: 4*pi/3*r**3rho_Sun = M_Sun / vol_sphere(R_Sun)rho_Earth = M_Earth / vol_sphere(R_Earth)

#Units are preserved along calculations, a unit can be changed calling the .to(u.unit) methodprint "Density of Earth:", rho_Earth.to(u.g/u.cm**3)print "Density of Sun:", rho_Sun

Some definitions (cont.)Light year:

Mass Earth is: 5.97e+24 kg

Density of Earth: 5.51141236929 g / cm3Density of Sun: 1412.12474755 kg / m3

Page 3: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

In [27]: ly = 1 * u.lyr

print "Number of seconds for light to travel from Sun to Earth:", 1./const.c.to(u.AU/u.s)print "Meters in a light year:", ly.to(u.m)

The Galaxy (CAPS = Milky Way, no caps = any old galaxy) is roughly a disk 50 kpc indiameter and 500 pc thick

In [28]: V_Gal = pi * (25000*u.pc)**2 * 500*u.pc

print "Volume of the Milky Way is approximately: %s " % V_Gal.to(u.m**3)M_Gal = 1E12 * M_Sunrho_Gal = M_Gal / V_Galprint "Average density of Milky Way is %s" % rho_Gal.to(u.g/u.cm**3)

Number of seconds for light to travel from Sun to Earth: 499.004783836 s / AUMeters in a light year: 9.46073047258e+15 m

Volume of the Milky Way is approximately: 2.88437372034e+61 m3 Average density of Milky Way is 6.89924466433e-23 g / cm3

Page 4: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Some GeographyMilky WayThe Sun is 7.6-8.7 kpc from the Galactic Center where there appears to be a supermassiveblack hole of 1 million solar masses ( ) which coincides with a radiosource known as Sagittarius A* .

+0.5"

+0.4"

+0.3"

+0.2"

+0.1"

0.0"

-0.1"

-0.2"

-0.3"

-0.4"

-0.5"

+0.5" +0.4" +0.3" +0.2" +0.1" 0.0" -0.1" -0.2"Right Ascension difference from 17h 45m 40.045s

Dec

linat

ion

diffe

renc

e fro

m -2

9° 0

' 27.

9"S1

S8

S12

S14

S13Orbits of some bodies of the Solar System

(Sedna, Eris, Pluto and Neptune)at the same scale for comparison

S2

However the Milky Way is not considered an Active Galactic Nuclei due to the low mass ofthe black hole. If considered a cylinder it will have a radius of 30 kpc and thickness of 300pc. Its mass is estimated to be .

= 1.99 × kgM⊙ 1030

5.8 × 1011M⊙

Page 5: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Some GeographyLocal GroupThe Milky Way is surrounded by 54 known satellite galaxies (most of them dwarf galaxies) ina group known as the Local Group. (A dwarf galaxy has billion stars compared to ourMilky Ways 200-400 billion stars)

The most notably the Large Magellanic Cloud (50 kpc) and the Small Magellanic Cloud (60kpc). The LMC mass is . Next nearest full-fledged galaxy is Andromeda or M31( ) at a distance of approximately 780 kpc. The group contains also othergalaxies MW, M31, M33 (Triangulum Galaxy) and it has volume of diameter of about 3 Mpc.

Some GeographyVirgo SuperclusterThe Local Group is itself contained within the Virgo Supercluster or Local Supercluster (LC)of galaxies extending out to about 33 Mpc. It has a total mass of

1010M⊙1.5 × 1012M⊙

1015M⊙

Page 6: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

TimeThere are several time standards or ways to specify time. A time standard can affect the rate(ie, how long is a day) or reference or point in time, or both. Some standards are:

Mean solar time (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_time#Mean_solar_time) Thereare two solar times, the aparent one (also called true one) which depends onlatitude and the year and the Mean solar time which the time of mean sun, thedifference between the two is called the equation of time (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_time#mediaviewer/File:Equation_of_time.svg). The length of the meansolar day is slowly increasing due to the tidal acceleration of the Moon by the Earthand the corresponding slowing of Earth's rotation by the Moon.

Universal Time (UT0, UT1) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Time) Is a timescale based on the mean solar day, defined to be as uniform as possible despitevariations in Earth's rotation

International Atomic Time (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Atomic_Time)Is the primary international time standard from which other time standards,including UTC, are calculated. TAI is kept by the BIPM (International Bureau ofWeights and Measures), and is based on the combined input of many atomic clocksaround the world.

Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinated_Universal_Time) is an atomic time scale designed to approximateUniversal Time. UTC differs from TAI by an integral number of seconds. UTC is keptwithin 0.9 second of UT1 by the introduction of one-second steps to UTC. Thedifference with UT1 is known as DUT1.

Page 7: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

TimeJD and MJDThese are not technically standards (or scales), they are just reprentations (formats) of theaforementioned standards typically used in Astronomy:

Julian Date (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_day) Is the count of days elapsedsince Greenwich mean noon on 1 January 4713 B.C., Julian proleptic calendar.Note that this day count conforms with the astronomical convention starting the dayat noon, in contrast with the civil practice where the day starts with midnight (inpopular use the belief is widespread that the day ends with midnight, but this is notthe proper scientific use).

Modified Julian Date (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_day) Is defined as MJD =JD - 2400000.5. The half day is subtracted so that the day starts at midnight inconformance with civil time reckoning. There is a good reason for this modificationand it has to do with how much precision one can represent in a double (IEEE 754)variable. Julian dates can be expressed in UT, TAI, TDT, etc. and so for preciseapplications the timescale should be specified, e.g. MJD 49135.3824 TAI.

TimeIn experimentsPractically speaking, in experiments time comes from one or more of the following sources:

Atomic clocks (Cs, Rb) -They use the microwave signal that electrons in atomsemit when they change energy levels. These have very good short termperformance but a Rb clock left by itself will wander by several ns per day. Csclocks are perhaps better by a factor of 100x.

GPS - The GPS gives precision timing too. The system consists of the spacesegment of O(30) satellites each equipped with Caesium atomic clocks and eachconstantly getting corrections from the central control facility. GPS broadcastsnavigation and time messages synchronized to this ultraprecise time from which theuser segment can extract time and space coordinates accurate to O(10) ns andmeters, respectively. GPS time is based on the 86400 second day. It indirectlyaccounts for leap years. There are no leap seconds in GPS time.

Page 8: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

AstropyTime converstions and coordinate conversions are best left to well-tested libraries. SLALIB isa famous set of Fortran libraries that do several transformation. For python I will use Astropy.The Astropy Project (http://www.astropy.org/) is a community effort to develop a single corepackage for Astronomy in Python and foster interoperability between Python astronomypackages. Is included by default in the Anaconda distribution.

In [29]: from astropy.time import Timeimport datetimei = datetime.datetime.now() print ("Today date and time in ISO format: %s" % i.isoformat() )

times = ['1999-01-01T00:00:00.123456789', i.isoformat()]

t = Time(times, format='isot', scale='utc')

print "Todays julian date (UTC) is %.2f" %(t[1].jd)print "Today's modified julian date (UTC) is %.2f" %t[1].mjd

dt = t[1] - t[0]

print "The time difference in mjd is %.2f " %dt.valueprint "The time difference in seconds is %.2f" %dt.sec

Coordinate SystemsLocal coordinatesCoordinate systems are used to map objects position in the sky. They can divided into to:

Local coordinates system. For example the horizontal coordinate system thatuses the observer's local position as reference. It is expressed in terms of altitude(or elevation or zenith) angle and azimuth. Celestials objects change coordinateswith time.

Today date and time in ISO format: 2015-03-09T13:18:24.876097Todays julian date (UTC) is 2457091.05Today's modified julian date (UTC) is 57090.55The time difference in mjd is 5911.55 The time difference in seconds is 510758307.75

Page 9: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Coordinate SystemsCelestial coordinate systems.

Equatorial coordinates: It's defined by an origin at the center of the Earth, afundamental plane consisting of the projection of the Earth's equator onto thecelestial sphere. Coordinates are give by right ascension and declination.

By Tfr000 (talk) 20:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC) [CC BY-SA 3.0](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or [GFDL](http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html), via Wikimedia

Commons

Galactic coordinates: The galactic longitude, is the angular distance Eastward(counterclockwise looking down on the Galaxy from the GNP) from the GalacticCenter and the galactic latitude, , is the angular distance outside of the plane ofthe Galaxy, positive up, negative down. Note that having a large galactic latitude isneither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for an object being extragalactic. Thisis how to get the image of the Galactic plane on the celestial sphere.

Coordinate SystemsCoordinate transformation.Let's do some "representation" of the galactic plane. We generate some random pointsusing numpy following a 2-dimensional gaussian in the : and : space.

b

ℓ −π, +π b −π/2, +π/2

Page 10: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

In [30]: #We call random.multivariate_normal to generate randon normal points at 0 import numpy as np

#For nicer plots (not needed)import seaborn; seaborn.set()

disk = np.random.multivariate_normal(mean=[0,0], cov=np.diag([1,0.001]), size=5000)#disk is a list of pairs [l, b] in radiansprint disk

figure(figsize=(10,8))ax = subplot(111, projection='aitoff')ax.set_title("Galactic Plane in Galactic Coordinates")grid(True)

ll = disk[:,0]bb = disk[:,1]

ax.plot(ll, bb, 'o', markersize=2, alpha=0.3)

Coordinate SystemsCoordinate transformationNow let's plot it in equatorial coordinates (right ascension, declination).

In [31]: from astropy import units as ufrom astropy.coordinates import SkyCoord

c_gal = SkyCoord(l=ll*u.radian, b=bb*u.radian, frame='galactic')c_gal_icrs = c_gal.icrs

[[ 0.93525848 -0.03319237] [ 0.60478049 0.02261375] [ 0.49565221 0.02664023] ..., [-0.5426621 0.01746572] [-0.1462731 -0.01213583] [ 2.88760162 0.00326396]]

Out[30]: [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x10c495510>]

Page 11: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Because matplotlib needs the coordinates in radians and between −π and π, not 0 and 2π,we have to convert them.

In [32]: ra_rad = c_gal_icrs.ra.wrap_at(180 * u.deg).radiandec_rad = c_gal_icrs.dec.radian

figure(figsize=(10,10))ax = subplot(111, projection="mollweide")ax.set_title("Galactic plane in equatorial coordinates")grid(True)ax.plot(ra_rad, dec_rad, 'o', markersize=2, alpha=0.3)#NOTE: Normally right ascension is plotted from right (0 deg.) to left (360 deg.)

Out[32]: [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x105ae3a10>]

Page 12: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Special RelativityWhy is it important?

Jets emitted by supermassive black holes have:

Electrons spiraling in B-field lines of pulsars have:

Lorentz factors of protons of eV:

Two principles:

The Principle of Relativity – The laws by which the states of physical systemsundergo change are not affected, whether these changes of state be referred to theone or the other of two systems in uniform translatory motion relative to each other

1.

The Principle of Invariant Light Speed– "... light is always propagated in emptyspace with a definite velocity [speed] c which is independent of the state of motionof the emitting body."

2.

γ = , β =1

1 − β2

‾ ‾‾‾‾‾‾

√ vc

γ ≈ 30 → β = 0.9984

γ ∼ 107

1020 γ = = =Em0

pc21020

1×109 1011

Page 13: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Lorentz TransformationsAs a simple case, consider a reference frame O and and observer in another frame O'moving at constant speed along the axis:

A Lorentz transformation or boost is the transformation from one inertial reference frame toanother. In general it is a matrix which encapsulates the system of equationsdescribing the transformation (in natural units).

β x

(4 × 4)

t ′

x′

y′

z′

= γ(t − βx)= γ(x − βt)= y= z

Page 14: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Lorentz transformationThe matrix form of this transformation is

This is just a particular case of a Lorentz transformation (there is nothing special on thex-axis) and a variable invariant under a Lorentz transformation is called Lorentz invariant orscalar.

The line element is a Lorentz invariant:

This can be rewritten as the inner product of a 4-vector :

where metric tensor is:

is called the Minkowski space

= , =x′μ Λμνxν Λμ

ν

⎜⎜⎜⎜

γ−βγ

00

−βγγ00

0010

0001

⎟⎟⎟⎟

Δs2

Δ = Δ − Δ − Δ − Δs2 t2 x2 y2 z2

Δ = ≡ =s2 x2 xμxμ gμνxμxν

gμν= +1, = = = −1, = 0, for μ ≠ νg00 g11 g22 g33 gμν

Page 15: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Consequences of Lorentztransformations

Relativity of simultaneity. in doesn't imply in :

Time dilatation. If i.e. the ticks of one clock:

Length contraction. For events satisfying :

Equivalence of mass and energy.

...

Equivalence mass and energyIn [33]: from IPython.display import YouTubeVideo

# Video credit: Minute PhysicsYouTubeVideo('hW7DW9NIO9M')

Δ = 0t ′ O′ Δt = 0 OΔ = γ(Δt − βΔx)t ′

Δx = 0Δ = γΔtt ′

Δ = 0t ′

Δ =x′ Δxγ

Out[33]:

Page 16: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Relativistic kinematicsFour-vectorsWe saw that position vectors in Minkowski space become 4-vectors with zeroth component.

, identified with time. Likewise momentum 4-vector has :

We saw that the inner product in Minkowski space is invariant under Lorentztransformations. In this case, the Lorentz invariant is:

which is the relativistic energy-momentum relationship.

One can derive the expresions for relativistic 3-momentum and kinetic energy:

= tx0 = Ep0

p = (E, )p x = (t, )x

s = = = − ⋅ → = ⋅ +pμpμ m20 E2 p p E2 p p m2

0

E = m = γm0

| | = βEp ≡ E − = (γ − 1)Ekin m0 m0

Page 17: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Relativistic kinematicsTransformation to the Center-of-Momentum System(CMS)As a concrete example of how 4-vectors aid real calculations, let's take the classic case of atransformation to the center-of-momentum system (CMS), that is, a coordinate frame wherethe total three-momentum . In this case the invariant square of a system is equal to thetotal CMS energy square or:

In the case of colliding particles, A and B, with energies and , and 3-momenta and :

The energy available for new particle creation is . If and then

Relativistic kinematicsFixed-target experimentIf the target particle B is at rest in the laboratory system (as is the case in accelerator fixed-target experiments or UHE cosmic rays striking nucleons in the atmosphere, or ...) then

and . In this case,

which in the ultra-relativistic limit where energies are much higher than the masses simplifies to

Equivalently, the threshold energy of the beam particle A needed to produce a particle ofmass at rest in the boosted frame is $$\begin{align} E{A,\mathrm{thresh}} = \frac{m*^2}{2m_B} \end{align}$$

= 0p

=s√ ECMS

( )EA ( )EB ( )p A( )p B

s = p2 = ( + − ( +EA EB)2 p A p B)2

= + + 2 − 2( ⋅ )m2A m2

B EAEB p A p B= + + 2 (1 − cos θ)m2

A m2B EAEB βAβB

= E2cms

ϵ = − −s√ mB mA ≫EA mA≫EB mB

≈ 2( − )ϵ2 EAEB p Ap B

( = )EB mB ( = 0)p B= + + 2E2

cms m2A m2

B EAmB

(E ≫ m)

ϵ = ≃Ecms 2mBEA‾ ‾‾‾‾‾‾√

( )m∗

Page 18: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Relativistic kinematicsExample 1: production. Considering the photoproduction of pion on a targetproton at rest mass:

4-vector Calculations in CMSCollider experimentIn the case of a collider experiment where beam particles A and B are counter-circulating inan accelerator and collide head-on, then

and the equation of the 3-momenta becomes

in the relativistic limit where mass can be ignored. This in turn has the consequence that in acollider experiment the energy available in the CMS to produce new particles rises linearlywith beam energy when .

Nevertheless, it is still the case that the CMS energies probed by astroparticles exceeds theLHC's reach by a factor of 10: consider an UHECR proton at interactingwith a proton ( ) at rest in the atmosphere.

In [34]: m_A = m_B = 1. #GeVE_A = 1e10 #GeVE_cms = sqrt(m_A*m_A + m_B*m_B + 2*(E_A*m_B))/1.e3print 'E_cms = %.1f TeV' % E_cms

π0

γ + p → p + π0

=s√ + 2m2p Eγmp

‾ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾√+ 2m2

p Eγmp

≥ +mp mπ 0

≥ + + 2m2p m2

π 0 m2pm2

π 0

≥ + ≈ 145 MeVEγ mπ 0m2

π 0

2mp

⋅ = −| || |p A p B p A p B

p As = = + + 2( + | || |) → ≃ 4E2

cms m2A m2

B EAEB p A p B ϵ2 EAEB

=EA EB

= GeVEA 1010

= 1GeVmB

E_cms = 141.4 TeV

Page 19: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Two-body decay in CMSThe CMS is also useful to estimate the energy of two particles from the decay of a particlewith mass . If a particle A decays into 1 and 2, , we have that in the CMS theparticle A has . Then the invariant is given by:

where . It can be proved that the energies in the CMS are given by:

and the momentum:

Energies and momentums are fixed, the only unknowns are the angles.

CosmologyRed-shiftRed-shift is the shift (towards red) in the electromagnetic spectrum and is defined as:

If a source of the light is moving away from an observer, then redshift (z > 0) occurs; if thesource moves towards the observer, then blueshift (z < 0) occurs. This is true for allelectromagnetic waves and is explained by the Doppler effect. Consequently, this type ofredshift is called the Doppler redshift.

M m1 m2= = 0p A p CMS

s = = ( + − ( +M2 E1 E2)2 p 1 p 2)2

= −p 1 p 2= ( + − )E1

12M

M2 m21 m2

2

= ( + − )E21

2MM2 m2

2 m21

| = − = ( − 2 ( + ) + ( + ) = |p 1 |2 E21 m2

11

4M2 M4 M2 m21 m2

2 m21 m2

2)2 p 2 |2

z =−λobs λemit

λemit

Page 20: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,
Page 21: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Relativistic RedshiftThe wavefront moves with velocity , but at the same time the source moves away withvelocity , so . The period in the reference system of the source is given by:

Remember that when a reference was moving at speed from a another reference ,the time relatiom was:

Since (we are just measuring when the crest of the waves arrive), then the timeobserved in the reference system O is given:

,

The corresponding observed frequency is

The ratio

is called the Doppler factor of the source relative to the observer. The correspondingwavelengths are related by

and the resulting redshift

can be written as

In the non-relativistic limit (when ) this redshift can be approximated by corresponding to the classical Doppler effect.

When interpreted as a relativistic Doppler shift from object receeding at velocity , this is:

cv λ + vt = ct

= = = ,tsλ

c − vc

(c − v)fs1

(1 − β)fs

Os β Oobs

Δt = γ(Δ − βΔ )tobs xobs

Δ = 0xobstobs

=totγ

= = γ(1 − β) =fo1to

fs1 − β1 + β‾ ‾‾‾‾‾

√ fs

=fsfo

1 + β1 − β‾ ‾‾‾‾‾

= =λo

λs

fsfo

1 + β1 − β‾ ‾‾‾‾‾

√z = =

−λo λs

λs

−fs fofo

z = − 1.1 + β1 − β‾ ‾‾‾‾‾

√v ≪ c z ≃ β = v

c

β

Page 22: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Hubble expansionWhen ploting their redshift (ie speed) as function of distance (measured with the techniqueswe saw, parallax, etc.) Hubble found a correlation between redshift and radial distance fromEarth:

Note that has only units of time we explicitely write the other dimensions to betterunderstand its meaning.

But Doppler redshift does not depends on distance! so there is also a Cosmologicalredshift. In this case the redshift is not due to relative velocities, the photons insteadincrease in wavelength and redshift because the spacetime through which they are travelingis expanding.

v = r, = 72 km/s/MpcH0 H0

H0−1

Page 23: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Hubble expansionBut we said that for midly relativistic objects (and galaxies are moving at midly relativisticspeeds) we can approximate so we can use to estimate distances!:

However is bit tricky, is it the distance when light was emitted or when ligth arrived?

If we assume that the rate of expansion (ie H) is essentially constant (it is not!) the age of theUniverse can be estimated to increase by a factor every which is the Hubble time.

The common interpretation of the expansion is that we are living in a Universe that can bethought of lying on the surface of a balloon. Distances between objects (points on the ballon)on this manifold are expressed as:

where is a scale factor, depending on the time, and is a comoving coordinate withouttime dependence or current distance if we assume , but sometimes its better toexplicitelly use a normalized scale factor as

Brooklyn is not expanding! (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U1-OmAICpU) Annie Hall

Are we expanding with the Universe?

z ≈ β zr ≃ z ≃ 4000 Mpc ⋅ z

cH0

e = = 14 × yrtHubble1

H0109

r(t) = R(t)r0

R(t) r0R(0) = 1

a(t) = R(t)/R(0)

= r → ∫ dr = ∫ dtdrdt

H01r

H0

Inr = t → r =H0 e tH0

Page 24: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Cosmological principleThe cosmological principle is the notion that the distribution of matter in the Universe ishomogeneous and isotropic when viewed on a large enough scale.

Homogeneity states that the distribution of matter is even in each epoch.

Isotropy states that there are no prefered directions in the distribution of matter inspace.

The End of Greatness (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe#End_of_Greatness)is an observational scale discovered at roughly 100 Mpc where the lumpiness seen in thelarge-scale structure of the universe is homogenized and isotropized, this together with theisotropy of the CMB reinforced the idea of the Cosmological Principle.

However, in 2013 a new structure 3 Gpc wide has been discovered, the Hercules–CoronaBorealis Great Wall (http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.1104), which puts doubt on the validity of thecosmological principle...

Page 25: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Friedmann–Lemaître-Robertson-WalkerSo we are looking for a Universe that is isotropic, homogeneous and it is expanding. Themetric that describes such a Universe is given by the Friedmann–Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric:

where refers to the spatial 3-dimentional metric depending on the curvature parameter which takes the values +1, 0, -1, and we used the normalized form of the scale factor

.

The evolution of the scale parameter as in the case of wavelength (to be proved):

d = d − R(t dΣ(k = d − (t) [ + (d + si θd )]s2 t2 )2 )2 t2 a2 R20

dr2

1 − kr2 r2 θ2 n2 ϕ2

dΣ(k)ka(t) = R(t)/R0

a(t) =1

1 + z

Page 26: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Friedman equationsEinstein's oringanl field equations are:

In Newtonian gravity, the source is mass. In special relativity, is a more general conceptcalled the energy-momemtum tensor, which may be modeled as a perfect fluid:

were is the fluid four-velocity. The FLRW metric solution to the Einstein equations can bereduced to the two Friedmann equations:

and

The cosmological constantEinstein was interested in finding (ie static) solutions. This can be achieved if and is appropriately tuned.But will not vanish in this case. Einstein therefore modified hisequations to:

and with this modification the Friedmann equations are:

The discovery by Hubble that the Universe is expanding eliminated the empirical need for astatic world. However, we believe that is actually nonzero, so Einstein was right after all.Assuming that cosmological constant is due to the vacuum energy, most quantum fieldtheories predict a that is 120 orders of magnitude larger than the observational values! thisis so-called cosmological constant problem.

− R = 8πGRμν12

gμν Tμν

= (ρ + p) + pTμν UμUν gμν

≡ = ρ −H 2 ( )aa

2 8πG3

kc2

a2R20

= − (ρ + 3p)aa

4πG3

= 0a k = +1ρ a

− R + Λ = 8πGRμν12

gμν gμν Tμν

H 2

aa

= = ρ + −( )aa

2 8πG3

Λ3

kc2

a2R20

= − (ρ + 3p) +4πG

3Λ3

Λ

Λ

Page 27: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Cosmological ConstantsFor any value of there is a critical density such as the geometry is flat ( ):

It is convenient to measure the the total energy density in terms of critical density byintroducing the density parameters:

In general the energy density will have contributions of distinct components so whe candefined:

where stands for matter (or dust) and radiation.

For t = 0

H k = 0

=ρcrit3H 2

8πG

Ω ≡ = ( ) ρρ

ρcrit

8πG3H 2

≡ = ( )Ωiρo

ρcrit

8πG3H 2 ρi

i

=H 20 Ω0

8πG3

ρ0

Page 28: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Evolution of the CosmologicalConstantsIn general the energy density will have contributions of distinct components which will evolvedifferently with the Universe expansion:

Massive particles with negligible velocities are known in cosmology as dust orsimply matter. Their density scales as the number density times their rest mass.Their number density scales as the inverse of the volume while the rest mass isconstant:

Relativistic particles are known as radiation (although it is not only photons) andtheir energy density is the number density times the particle energy, the latter isproportional to (as they redshift with expansion) and so:

Vacuum energy does not change as universe expand so we can define a

It is useful to pretend that represents an effective curvature energydensity defining .

Given this evolution it is possible to write:

∝ρM a−3

a−1 ∝ρr a−4

≡ ∝ρΛΛ

8πG a0

−ka−2R−20

≡ −(3k/8πG )ρk R20 a−2

(t) = [ (1 + z + (1 + z + (1 + z + ]H 2 H 20 ΩM )3 Ωr )4 Ωk )2 ΩΛ

Page 29: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Observational resultsThere are good reasons to believe that the energy density of radiation is much lessthan matter, as photon contrinute only to mostly in the CMB.Therefore is useful to parametrize the universe today as .

Direct measures of the Hubble constant.. The most reliable result on the Hubbleconstant comes from the Hubble Space Telecope Key Project(http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/553/1/47). They use the Cepheids to obtaindistances to 31 galaxies (They also use Type Ia Supernovae). A recent study withover 600 Cepheids yileded the number . Theindirect measurement from Planck Collaboration gives somehow a lowe value (thisdiscreptancy as well as the comic distance-ladder method are under investigation).

Supernovae. Two major studies, the Supernova Cosmology Project and the High-Supernova Search Team, found evidence for an accelerating Universe. Whencombined with the CMB data indicating flatness (ie ),the best-fit values were and )

Cosmic Microwave Background. See next.

And the amount of anisotropy at the multipole moment via the power spectrum

,

∼ 5 ×Ωr 10−5

= 1 − −Ωk ΩM ΩΛ

= 73.8 ± 2.4 km MpH0 s−1 c−1

z

= 0 → + = 1Ωk ΩM ΩΛ≈ 0.3ΩM ≈ 0.7ΩΛ

= (θ, ϕ)ΔTT ∑

ℓmaℓmYℓm

ℓ= ⟨| ⟩Cℓ aℓm |2

θ =180∘

Page 30: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Observational resultsCosmic Microwave Background

The power spectrum of the CMB represents the anisotropies of the CMB as a function of theangular scale. The typical spectrum features a plateu at large angular scales (small )followed by some oscillatory features (aka acoustic peaks or Doppler peak). These peaksrepresent the oscillation of photon-baryon fuild around the decoupling. The first peak at

probes the spatial geometry, while the relative heights probe the baryon density.The position of the first peak constrains the spatial geometry in a way consistent with a flatUniverse ( )

ℓ ∼ 200

∼ 0Ωk

Page 31: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Observational resultsBefore Planck

Observational resultsAfter Planck

Planck showed that the amount of dark energy in the Universe is appreciably less than wehad previously thought, while the amount of dark-and-normal matter is appreciably greaterthan we thought.

Page 32: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

Age of UniverseWe have shown the evolution of the Hubble expansion as a function of the redshift using theclousure parameters. We know that

Astropy also has some built-in cosmologies using the values extracted from experiments.And so the age of the universe can be calculated as (where corresponds to today ):

Assuming a flat Universe and ignoring the radiation the integral getssimplified to:

where we used

H(z) = = − ( ) → dt = −aa

dz/dt(1 + z)

dz(1 + z)H(z)

z = 0 t0

dt = =∫t0

0t0

1H0 ∫

0

dz(1 + z + (1 + z + (1 + z + (1 + z)]ΩM )4 Ωr )5 Ωk )3 ΩΛ

= 0Ωk ≪Ωr ΩM

= In ( )H0t01

3 1 − ΩM‾ ‾‾‾‾‾‾√1 + 1 − ΩM‾ ‾‾‾‾‾‾√1 − 1 − ΩM‾ ‾‾‾‾‾‾√

1 = +ΩΛ ΩM

Page 33: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

In [35]: def H0T0(omega): return 1/(3*np.sqrt(1-omega))*np.log((1 + np.sqrt(1-omega))/(1 - np.sqrt(1-omega)))

omega = np.arange(0, 1.0, 0.01)

ax = subplot(111)ax.plot(omega, H0T0(omega))ax.set_xlabel("$\Omega_M$", fontsize=20)ax.set_ylabel("$H_0 t_0$", fontsize=20)ax.set_title("Age for a Flat Universe")

print " For Omega_M = 0.7 the value of H0T0 is: %.3f" %H0T0(0.3)

For and one finds so that Gyr. Larger than the assumption we did with a constant .

In [36]: #Now lets use the cosmology built in astropyfrom astropy.cosmology import Planck13, WMAP7print Planck13.age(0)print WMAP7.age(0)

For Omega_M = 0.7 the value of H0T0 is: 0.964

= 0.70ΩM = (1 − ) = 0.70ΩΛ ΩM = 0.964H0t0≈= 0.96/ = 13.5t0 H0 H0

13.7962923156 Gyr13.7536294693 Gyr

Page 34: Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2aguilar/PHYS-467/PA2.pdf · Particle Astrophysics Lecture 2 The computational framework: Particle Physics and Cosmology Université Libre de Bruxelles,

In [54]: #We are going to plot the H "constant" to verify that is not a constant

z = np.arange(0.001, 2, 0.01)ax = subplot(111)#Let's assume midly relativistic ie z ~ v: so d = z* c/Hax.plot(z, z*const.c.to(u.km/u.s).value/Planck13.H(0).value, label="H_0")ax.plot(z, z*const.c.to(u.km/u.s).value/Planck13.H(z).value, label="H(z)")legend()ax.set_xscale("log")ax.set_yscale("log")ax.set_xlabel("$z$", fontsize="20")ax.set_ylabel("D (Mpc)", fontsize="20")

Out[54]: <matplotlib.text.Text at 0x10de31310>