80
Part I Town of Norwich I–1

Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

Part I

Town of Norwich

I–1

Page 2: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

Elected Officials

SelectboardEd Childs, Chair . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Jack Candon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Alison May . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Gerard Chapdelaine, Vice Chair .2009Suzanne Lupien . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010

Town ClerkBonnie Munday . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Carolyn Clogston, AssistantPhil Dechert, AssistantRoberta Robinson, Assistant

Town TreasurerCheryl Lindberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Neil Fulton, Assistant

Agent to ProsecuteFrank Olmstead . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008

AuditorsHenry Scheier, Chair . . . . . . . . . .2008Karen Kayen (Chair, Fin. Com.) . .2009

Cemetery CommissionFred Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Earl Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Robert Parker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010Ed Janeway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2011Fred Spaulding, Chair . . . . . . . . . .2012

Fence ViewerWatt AlexanderLiz Russell

Finance CommitteeIrv Thomae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Paul Tierney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Al Converse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009

Justices of the PeaceTerry Appleby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Brooke Adler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Susan Dunbar Blum . . . . . . . . . .2009Joyce Childs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Ernie Ciccotelli . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Nancy Dean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Robert Gere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Nancy Hoggson . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Donald Kreis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Fred Smith, Jr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Jay Van Arman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Cleta Wheeler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009

ListersDennis Kaufman . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Jean Essex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Richard Blacklow . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010

ModeratorWarren Thayer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008

Norwich School BoardStanton Williams, Vice Chair . . . .2008Linda Gray . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Geoffrey Vitt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Mary Sachsse, Chair . . . . . . . . . . .2009Carey Callaghan, Secretary . . . . . .2010

Trustees of Trust FundsMarie Elise Young . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Barbara Merrill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Cheryl Lindberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010

Appointed OfficialsTown Manager (serves also as Collector of Delinquent Taxes,Emergency Management Director and SolidWaste Coordinator)

Stephen J. SoaresNancy Kramer, Assistant

Affordable HousingBeth BarrettMary Ann Hankel, Co-ChairNancy HoggsonRalph HybelsPaul ManganielloCreigh Moffatt, Co-ChairKathleen Shepherd

Bugbee Senior Center RepresentativeMartha Drake, Paula Harris

Conservation CommissionDavid Hubbard . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008William Pierce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Liz Blum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Craig Layne, Chair . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Frank Olmstead . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Lee Michaelides . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010Peter Silberfarb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010Brian Kunz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2011Brad Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2011

I–2

Norwich Town Officers & Committees for 2007

Page 3: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

Development Review BoardErnie Ciccotelli . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Nancy Dean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009John Lawe, Chair . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009George Loveland . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010Stanley Teeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010Christopher Ashley, alternate . . . .2008Eric Friets, alternate . . . . . . . . . . .2009Arline Rotman, alternate . . . . . . . .2010

Emergency Management CoordinatorCharlie Hodgdon

Energy CommitteeAlan Berolzheimer, ChairAmes ByrdJamie HessDan KingMark LaserGary Winslow

Finance OfficerRoberta RobinsonAlison McRee, Assistant

Fire ChiefNeil Fulton

Fire WardenNancy LaRowe

GUV Solid Waste Man. DistrictBrion McMullan . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Stephen Soares, Alternate . . . . . . .2009

Health OfficerJohn Lawe, MD . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Bonnie Munday, Deputy . . . . . . . .2010

Milton Frye Nature Area CommitteeGeorge ClarkKaren KniffenLindsay PutnamClayton SimmersWarren Thayer, ChairWendy Thompson

Planning CommissionAdele Fulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Lynn McGrew . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Ralph Hybels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Jaye Pershing Johnson . . . . . . . . .2009Richard Stucker . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010Tom Gray . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2011Daniel Johnson, Chair . . . . . . . . .2011

Police ChiefDouglas Robinson

Public Works (formerly Highway Dept.) Director

Andy Hodgdon

Recreation CouncilKathy Menard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008Doug Kennedy, President . . . . . .2008Kris Strohbehn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Lisa Adams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Lars Blackmore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Kristin Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Stuart Close . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Ann Greenwald . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010Bernard Haskell . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010Hugh Huizenga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010Eric Sachsse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2010

Senior Action CouncilTheda BrighamMartha Drake, ChairPaula Harris, secretaryMary Irene MooreBill OsgoodMary Rassias

Town Service OfficerSuzanne Lupien . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008

Transportation CommitteeRoberta AlexanderBob ChamberlinLucy Gibson, ChairLinda GrayAnn GreenwaldBeth HaneyJamie HessEd JanewayJohn LaweSharon RacusinAlice Worth

Tree WardenJake Blum

Two Rivers-Ottauquechee RC Rep.Nancy Hoggson . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008

Watershed Land Management CouncilSusan McCoy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2008John Currier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2009Clay Adams, Chair . . . . . . . . . . . .2010

Zoning AdministratorPhil Dechert

I–3

Page 4: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

MinutesTown of Norwich, Vermont and Norwich Town School District

March 6, 2007The meeting was called to order at 7:03 by Moderator Warren Thayer.

Article 1. Elect a Moderator of the Town and School District meeting for one year. There was nodiscussion.

Article 2. Elect Town and School District Officers for terms starting in 2007. There was no discussion.

Article 3. Hear and act on the reports of the Officers of the Town and Town School District. Therewas no discussion.

Article 4. Authorize the Board of School Directors to borrow money by issuance of bonds or notes notin excess of anticipated revenues for the next fiscal year in accordance with the provisions of 16VSA § 562(9). There was no discussion.

Article 5. Shall the voters of the Norwich Town School District determine and fix the salaries of theSchool Board members in the sum of $500 each per year in accordance with the provisions of 16VSA § 562(5)? Geoffrey Vitt said that this was self-explanatory. He reminded peopleabout “Get Off Your Duff Day” as an opportunity for look at what people in town gov-ernment do. Also, if someone sees or feels that something is important but not urgent,to please let the board know.

Article 6. Shall the voters of the Norwich Town School District appropriate $4,656,346, necessaryfor the support of its school for the year beginning July 1, 2007, and ending June 30, 2008? StanWilliams gave a presentation relating the tax rate to the budget. He stated that this yearthe school portion of the tax rate will drop just a little even though the budget is up.Education spending is up 4.24%, the Cross budget up 11.30%. The Dresden budget isup 7% though the Norwich share is 1.63%. This year Teacher salaries are up, SocialSecurity is up, transportation is down and Special Education is up. Vitt explained thatthere are intricate federal requirements to provide Special Education in schools. Wehave children with mild needs to children who need a one on one aide. The childrenwe cannot meet the needs of are sent out of district. When this happens the cost isabout $100,000 per child.

Linda Gray gave a tax presentation showing that the education tax rate, which was orig-inally set at $1.10 last year, will drop to .89 for this year for residential property. Non-Residential rate will be $1.38. This is the reason that although our spending is up, thetax rate will be lower this year.

Article 7. Transact any other business that may legally come before the annual meeting of the NorwichTown School Board. Mary Sachsse introduced the School Administrators. Henry Scheierspoke on behalf of the Finance Committee saying that the Finance Committee votedunanimously to support the School Budget.

Deb Kaplan, Chair of the PTO congratulated and thanked the School Board for put-ting forward a prudent budget.

Article 8. Approve a gross spending General Town Budget of $3,785,194 plus unanticipated stateand federal grants and gifts consistent with budgeted programs for the period July 1, 2007 to June30, 2008. Town Manager Stephen Soares spoke to this article. He noted that we nowhave a Public Works Dept., which is comprised of the Road Maintenance and PublicSafety. Soares went through the departments starting with the Fire Department statingthat this department is up 83%, this rise represents the prospect of hiring a full timeFire Chief, also for apparatus, maintenance, miscellaneous tools and equipment.Health Insurance is up 18%, which is lower than the 36% projection, we went with theVLCT in changing our policy from BCBS to CIGNA insurance. Public Works is up8.5%. This recognizes the need to do paving and retreat some of the roads. Grant

I–4

Page 5: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–5

expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge grants andthe language of the grant. Human Services is up 7%, which is a cost shift fromHanover Ambulance. Support Group is up due to our share owed to the VermontLeague of Cities and Towns. Windsor County Taxes are up 8% for Norwich’s share.Town Clerk is down 5.51% due to a shift of GUVSWD coupons into the solid wastebudget. Recreation is up 21% due to a reduction in programs such as the Circus Camprunning from 6 weeks down to two weeks. Reserve Funds are down 11% due to areduced request of funds. The Police Department is down 5.51% as a result in a reduc-tion of wages and in the capitol reserve fund.

Irv Thomae from the Norwich Finance Committee stated the on a vote of four to two,the Finance Committee endorses this budget with a 2.17% net increase.

Article 9. Pursuant to 32 VSA § 3845, shall the voters of the Town of Norwich exempt from taxa-tion that portion of a property’s assessment, which is devoted to qualifying alternative energy gen-eration? Dennis Kaufman spoke to this article, first reminding people to make sure theyfill out their HS122 forms. Kaufman is asking people to vote against this article, notalternative energy, because of the loss of funds by such a vote in the education portionof our taxes. On all voted exemptions, the town has to make up the loss of educationfunding portion of the exemption.

Charlotte Metcalf stated that it is inappropriate to tax methods of alternative energyand is asking the Town to support this article.

Article 10. (ADVISORY ONLY) Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich advise the Selectboard toconsider a reduction of the Norwich Police Department from five officers to four officers recog-nizing that such a reduction will likely result in a reduction in the level of services and hours ofcoverage provided by that Department? Candon spoke to this article state that currently wehave a five-member police force. This is a compromise to break the dead lock of theboard and let them know how the Town feels about this.

There was discussion about having a separate meeting to talk about what the people inNorwich would like to see in their Police Department. Should we reduce the size ofour force, go from patrolling twenty hours a day to sixteen hours a day. Can they chargefor some of their services such as property checks when people are out of town?

Another concern is the relationship that the Police Department has with the people ofthe Town, and how the younger people of this town are treated.

May stated that the Police do more than patrol the roads, they respond to motor vehi-cle accidents, fire calls, and ambulance calls.

Article 11. Pursuant to 32 VSA § 3802, shall the Town of Norwich raise the veteran’s tax exemp-tion from $20,000 to $40,000 of assessed value? There was no discussion.

Article 12. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich authorize the transfer of $4,938 (plus interest)remaining in the Highway – VT Route 132 Bridge Designated Fund to the General Fund budg-et? There was no discussion.

Article 13. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich instruct the Selectboard to present separate arti-cles for the budgets of the Police, Fire/Fast, Public Works and General Administration for votingat Town meeting? Brion McMullan spoke to this article saying that this will allow votersto voice certain concerns in regards to a department rather than to vote down thewhole budget.

Article 14. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $457,453 for the operating expens-es of the Police Department? The Selectboard urges the voters to vote yes. Even if this arti-cle is voted down, the money is still in the budget to run the department.

Article 15. (ADVISORY ONLY) Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich advise the Selectboard toappoint a committee to consider the appropriate form of government for the Town of Norwich?

Page 6: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–6

Watt Alexander spoke saying that he was on the original committee regarding havinga Town Administrator versus a Town Manager form of government and would not liketo put another committee through that.

This article started as a petitioned article, the Selectboard obtained independent legalcouncil that said that it should be in a specific format, and not the format that the peti-tion was turned in as. The original petition stated a transition period allowing the dateof the change to be September 1, 2007 if passed. Vermont statue states that whenchanging the form of government the change has to take place within thirty (30) days.

Rob Edson stated that for the process to work, the elected Board hires and needs tooversee people in an effective way.

Liz Russell agrees with Rob and Watt but feels that the only people who could serveare people who are retired, wealthy or unemployed.

Terry Boone said that the new Selectboard needs to go back and re read the report,and do a better job overseeing the manager and make it clear in what is expected ofthat person.

Article 16. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $500 to the Senior Action Council?There was no discussion.

Article 17. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $1,250 to the Norwich AmericanLegion? There was no discussion.

Article 18. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $141,000 for the operating expensesof the Norwich Public Library Association? Lucinda Walker spoke to this article saying theyhad a great year. The number of visits is up. They are partnering with local organiza-tions and are encouraging people to come in. She would like to thank the volunteerswho help keep the Library open for forty-four (44) hours per week.

Article 19. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $2,000 to ACORN (A CommunityResource Network)? Kim Woods spoke hoping the Town will support this article. Testinghas expanded out to include Hepatitis C.

Article 20. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $9,082 to Advance Transit? SharonRacusin and Van Chestnut spoke saying that this year Norwich reported 9,391 ridersin FY 2006. They stated that one of the ways to fight Global Warming is to get on thebus. This is the first time in two years they have asked for an increase which is 8%increase, but they have had a 28% increase in riders.

Article 21. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $1,284 to The Family Place? Therewas no discussion.

Article 22. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $2,500 to Headrest? There was nodiscussion.

Article 23. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $1,750 to SEVCA (SoutheasternVermont Community Action)? There was no discussion.

Article 24. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $5,300 to the White River Councilon Aging? There was no discussion.

Article 25. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $1,000 to Windsor County Partners?Nancy Dean spoke to this article stating the Windsor County Partners began in 1975matching adult volunteers with children the ages of ten to seventeen. This has alwaysbeen strong in Norwich and many children need an adult in their lives. She hopes theTown will support this article.

Article 26. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $2,500 to WISE (Women’sInformation Service)? There was no discussion.

Page 7: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–7

Article 27. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $6,000 to Youth-In-Action? Thankswere extended to Youth in Action for childcare in the past.

Article 28. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $15,000 to the CemeteryCommission under 18 VSA § 5361 to supplement the interest from the Perpetual Care TrustFund for maintenance of the Town Cemeteries? Robert Parker spoke to this article sayingthere are 12 cemeteries, which the commission cares for. Seven we mow and take careof the grounds and repairs and we will be taking care of the Union Village Cemetery.There is less money coming in from Trust Fund Interest. Also, this year they will bestarting the expansion in Hillside Cemetery.

Article 29. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $2,500 to the Upper Valley TrailsAlliance? There was no discussion

Article 30. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $1,906 to Windsor County CourtDiversion Program? There was no discussion.

Article 31. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $8,000 to the Norwich HistoricalSociety and Community Center to assist with general operations? Nancy Osgood thanks theTown for their endorsement last year. This money helps pay for the administration andevents that take place at the Historical Society. They have had the sill and roof repairedand had a fire alarm installed. She noted upcoming Spring Events.

Article 32. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $13,070 to the Visiting NurseAssociation & Hospice of VT and NH in support of various programs? Jim Wooster who is amember of the Board said they serve all who qualify without regard of ability to pay.They are asking 86 Towns and cities for their support.

Article 33. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $3,093 to the Health Care andRehabilitation Services of Southeast Vermont in support of community services provided toNorwich? Ed Piper thanks the Town for its continued support and hopes for our sup-port again this year. This money goes towards support for people with substance abuse,instability and employment problems.

Article 34. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $1,344 to The Child Care Centerfor a one-year income sensitive scholarship? There was no discussion.

Article 35. Shall the voters of the Town of Norwich appropriate $500 to the Green Mountain RSVP& Volunteer Center of Windsor County to develop opportunities for people age 55 and older topositively impact the quality of life in the community through volunteer service? Beth Barrettexplained that this is for seniors and elder care. This would be used to begin programswith seniors in the Town. They have enlisted the help of seven organizations.

Article 36. Require that taxes be paid in U.S. funds in two installments. The first installment will bedue and accepted at the Town of Norwich Finance Office on or before 4:30 pm August 17, 2007and the balance will be due at the same location on or before 4:30 pm February 15, 2008. Anofficial United States Post Office postmark/cancellation (not a postage machine date) will deter-mine the payment date for all mailed payments. Interest on overdue taxes will be charged at 1%per month for the first three months and 1.5% per month thereafter. All delinquent taxes will besubject to an 8% collection fee in accordance with Vermont Statutes after February 15, 2008.All taxes, interest and collection fees will be paid into the Town Treasury. There was no dis-cussion.

Article 37. Transact any other business that may legally come before the annual Norwich TownMeeting. Cheryl Lindberg thanked the Auditors and Henry Scheier for their work onthe Town Report.

Meeting adjourned at 10:09 PM.

Respectfully Submitted,Bonnie J. Munday, Norwich Town Clerk

Page 8: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–8

Ballot ResultsArticles 1 & 2, March 6, 2007

Moderator (1 year) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Warren Thayer . . . . . . . . . . . . .900

Dresden-Norwich School Director (3 years) . . . . . . . . .Andrew Carey Callaghan . . . . .835

Lister (3 years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Richard Blacklow . . . . . . . . . . .790

Selectman (3 years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Brooke Adler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .411 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Suzanne Lupien . . . . . . . . . . . . .613

Selectman (2 years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Gerard Chapdelaine . . . . . . . . .786

Auditor (3 years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .write-in not sufficient to elect

Grand Juror (1 year) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .write-in not sufficient to elect

Finance Committee (3 years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .write-in not sufficient to elect

Finance Committee (2 year unexpired term) . . . . . . . .Alvin Converse . . . . . . . . . . . . .774

Agent to Prosecute & Defend Suits (1 year) . . . . . . . .write-in not sufficient to elect

Cemetery Commissioner (5 years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Fred Spaulding . . . . . . . . . . . . .883

Cemetery Commissioner (1 year unexpired term) . . . .Fred Smith, Jr . . . . . . . . . . . . . .893

Trustee of Trust Funds (3 years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cheryl Lindberg . . . . . . . . . . . .848

Page 9: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–9

Norwich Finance Committee Budget StatementThe Finance Committee voted to support the proposed FY 2009 gross spending town

budget of $3,880,754 by a vote of 5 to 1. This is 2.52% above the FY 2008 budget of$3,785,194. Please note that this gross spending town budget does not include the separatemonetary articles to be voted at Town Meeting.

During its deliberations on the budget, the Committee looked at spending informationand changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) over 10 years. Those supporting the motionnoted that the increase of 2.52% over the FY 2008 budget compared favorably with theincrease in the CPI. The member opposed to the budget stated that while the percentage ofincrease appears reasonable, it merely entombs past increases at approximately three timesthe rate of inflation, which he views as excessive.

The Finance Committee included Articles 6, 7, 8 and 9 in its budget deliberations. TheCommittee makes a practice of never opining on the special monetary articles for outsideagencies. Articles 6 through 9 are of a different nature and we felt they deserved our consid-eration.

Article 6 asks the voters to approve increasing the General Fund by $45,033 for paving tobe paid for by a FEMA grant reimbursement. To provide some context, the HighwayDepartment had to use part of its 2008 budget to pay for cleanup after a storm.Reimbursement for most, if not all, of this unanticipated expenditure will be received dur-ing FY 2008. However, the Highway Department will not be paving until FY 2009 andwould like to be able to do the paving it had to delay. Had the expense, the reimbursementand the delayed paving occurred in the same fiscal year, no vote would have been necessary.That did not happen and a vote is required. The Finance Committee voted unanimously tosupport Article 6.

Article 7 asks the voters to approve an expenditure of $72,266 for the purchase of a vehi-cle exhaust system for the Norwich Fire Department. This expenditure is regarded as neces-sary for the health and safety of the firefighters. The Finance Committee voted unanimous-ly to support Article 7.

Article 8 asks voters to extend for three years the appropriation of $45,000 for a revolv-ing fund to initiate contracts and acquire land suitable for affordable housing. This item isoffset by a Transfer in from Designated Fund of $46,796 in the Revenue Report. TheFinance Committee voted unanimously to support Article 8.

Article 9 is similar to Article 6 in that it addresses an expenditure timing issue that nowrequires a vote. It requests authorization to spend $32,000 originally appropriated in the FY2007 budget to complete work on the Kendall Station Road project. The FinanceCommittee voted unanimously to support Article 9.

Throughout the budget process, the Finance Committee found the Town’s lack of bothstrategic and capital plans to be significant hindrances to evaluating the budget. We urge theSelectboard to move forward on both of these fronts as soon as possible. The Committeealso suggests that the Selectboard set its budget guidelines early and clearly by providing atarget percentage of change in the budget.

Karen Kayen (Chair), Alvin Converse, Cheryl Lindberg, Henry Scheier, Irv Thomae, and Paul Tierney

Page 10: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–10

Income-Based School TaxOn or before April 15, 2008 every resident homeowner is required to file Vermont Form

HS-122, the “Homestead Declaration”, which is contained in the state’s Income Tax ReturnBooklet. If your 2007 “household income” is less than $90,000, completing the second halfof HS-122 may reduce your net school tax this year to 3.16% of your “household income”.If “household income” is between $90,000 and $97,000, the resulting reduction will bemore limited.

“Household Income” is calculated using Form HI-144, and it is often less than Federal“Adjusted Gross Income” (AGI). A few minutes spent with Form HI-144 may be richlyrewarded, even when AGI is as high as $105,000. Statewide about two-thirds of Vermonthomeowners pay at least part of their school taxes based on income rather than on proper-ty value. If you qualify, do not hesitate to file.

Note: Even if your income tax filing deadline is extended, Form HS-122 must be filedby April 15, 2008 to avoid a reduction in your property tax adjustment, as well as otherpenalties. If you don’t know your exact income by April 15, then file Form HS-122 ontime, using estimated numbers, and be sure to amend your filing before September 1,2008 at the latest.

Growth in Norwich Income And ExpendituresAdjusted for Inflation: 1996 = 100

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

1996-

97

1997-

98

1998-

99

1999-

00

2000-

01

2001-

02

2002-

03

2003-

04

2004-

05

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

2008-

09Year

Perc

en

t o

f 19

96

-97

Marion Cross Expenditures per Pupil

Dresden Expenditures per Pupil

Town expenditures per Capita

Norwich Per Capita Income

Prepared by Paul Tierney

Page 11: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–11

FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY08-FY09

Actual Budget Proposed % Increase

Town (including Articles) 3,735,160$ 4,004,773$ 4,277,583$ 6.81%

Marion Cross School 4,297,269 4,656,346 4,922,258 5.71%

Dresden Assessment 5,617,637 5,699,712 5,474,552 -3.95%

Total School 9,914,906 10,356,058 10,396,810 0.39%

Total Expenditures 13,650,066$ 14,360,831$ 14,674,393$ 2.18%

FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY08-FY09

Actual Actual Projected* % Increase

Town Rate without Articles 0.4418$ 0.4387$ 0.4378$ -0.20%

Town Rate for Articles 0.0357 0.0323 0.0584$ 80.94%

Local Agreement Rate 0.0015 0.0018 0.0038$ 113.55%

Total Town Rate 0.4790 0.4790 0.5001 4.40%

School Homestead** 1.4550 1.4580 1.4550 -0.21%

School Non-residential** 1.3364 1.2981 1.3364 2.95%

Total Tax Rate

Homestead 1.9340$ 1.9308$ 1.9551$ 1.26%

Non-residential 1.8154$ 1.7709$ 1.8365$ 3.70%

FY2007

Actual

FY2008

Estimated

FY2009

Projected*

FY08-FY09

% IncreaseTown 3,081,306$ 3,236,297$ 3,369,639$ 4.1%

Combined School*** 8,856,169$ 9,533,865$ 9,637,655$ 1.1%

Total taxes to be raised 11,937,475$ 12,770,162$ 13,007,294$ 1.9%

*** In August of 2007 the Vermont Department of Education estimated that $549,037 of the FY08 tax

collected was payable to the Education Fund. Based on December 2007 information from the Vermont

Tax Department, 490 Norwich taxpayers received the following Property Tax Adjustments and Rebates:

451 received school property tax adjustments totalling $1,211,208 (of these 163 also received circuit

breaker tax adjustments totalling $136,506), and 39 received renter rebates totaling $31,189

LOCAL GROSS EXPENDITURES SUMMARY

AMOUNTS TO BE RAISED BY TAXES

** Under the school funding system there are two different tax rates: one for homestead property and one

for non-residential property. A homestead is the principal dwelling owned and occupied by a resident

individual as the individual's domicile. All non-homestead property is classified as non-residential.

TOTAL TAX RATE (Per $100 of Assessed Value)

* Assumes an estimated Town Grand List on April 1, 2008 of $679,000,000

Town of Norwich and Norwich School District Summary

Page 12: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–12

Norwich School District2008-2009 School Year Tax Rate Calculation

$0

$2,000,000

$4,000,000

$6,000,000

$8,000,000

$10,000,000

$12,000,000

$14,000,000

$16,000,000

1996-

97

1997-

98

1998-

99

1999-

00

2000-

01

2001-

02

2002-

03

2003-

04

2004-

05

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

2008-

09

Year

Exp

end

itu

res

Dresden

Marion Cross

Town

Dresden

Town

Marion Cross

Norwich Town & School ExpendituresGross Budgeted Expenditures as Proposed to Voters

Estimated Estimated

Item 2008-09 2007-08 Chg % Chg

1 Marion Cross School $4,922,258 $4,656,346 265,912 5.71%

2 plus Dresden Assessment 5,474,552 5,699,712 -225,160 -3.95%

3 less Revenues and Fund Balance (excl

Voc Aid)1,390,984 1,409,332 -18,348 -1.30%

4 equals Education Spending $9,005,826 $8,946,726 59,100 0.66%

5 Estimated equalized pupils 654.13 658.71 -4.58 -0.70%

6 Adjusted ES/Eq Pupil $13,768 $13,582 $185 1.37%

6a Debt per pupil $1,045 $1,062

7 Adjusted ES/Eq Pupil for purposes of

Excess Spending$12,722 $12,520

8 Excess Spending Threshold $13,330 $12,575 $755 6.00%

9 Per pupil Spending above/(below)

Threshold(607) (55)

10 Per pupil figure for Calculating District

Adjustment$13,768 $13,582

11 Base Amount $8,210 $7,736 $474 6.13%

12 District Spending Adjustment 167.694% 175.571% -7.877% -4.49%

13 Statewide Ed Tax Rate $0.87 $0.87

13a Equalized Homestead Tax $1.4589 $1.5275 -0.0685 -4.49%

14 Common level of appraisal 100.27% 104.77% -4.5% -4.30%

15 Estimated nominal tax rate $1.4550 $1.4579 (0.0029) -0.20%

16 Income Sensitivity Percentage 3.02% 3.16% -0.14% -4.49%

17 Non Residential Tax Rate $1.34 $1.39 (0.05) -3.60%

18 Divide by CLA 100.27% 104.77% -4.50% -4.30%

19 Nominal Non-Residential Tax Rate $1.3364 $1.3267 0.0097 0.73%

Note: Tax rate info preliminary and subject to state legislative changes.

Prepared by Paul Tierney

Page 13: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–13

FY

- 2007

FY

- 2007

FY

- 2008

FY

- 2009

FY

- 08/09

FIN

AL

ES

T.*

AC

TU

AL

ES

TIM

AT

EE

ST

IMA

TE

%

CH

AN

GE

RE

DU

CT

ION

IN

FU

ND

BA

LA

NC

E14

,252

$

33

,64

8$

13

6.0

9%

PR

OP

ER

TY

TA

X R

EV

EN

UE

S

TO

WN

PR

OP

ER

TY

TA

X

2,8

81,6

16$

2,9

01,1

29

$

2,9

85

,64

5$

2,9

72

,810

$

-0

.43

%

PR

OP

ER

TY

TA

X F

OR

OT

HE

R M

ON

ET

AR

Y A

RT

206,6

80

231

,18

021

9,5

79

396,8

29

80.7

2%

RA

ILR

OA

D T

AX

-

1,445

--

VT

LA

ND

US

E T

AX

62,0

00

71,1

26

71,0

00

75,0

00

PR

OP

ER

TY

TA

X I

NT

ER

ES

T10

,000

23,0

00

15,0

00

20,0

00

PR

OP

ER

TY

TA

X C

OL

LE

CT

ION

FE

E

12,0

00

16,3

62

12,0

00

15

,000

TO

TA

L P

RO

PE

RT

Y T

AX

RE

VE

NU

E3

,17

2,2

96

$

3,2

44

,24

3$

3,3

03

,224

$

3,4

79

,63

9$

5

.34

%

LIC

EN

SE

& P

ER

MIT

RE

VE

NU

E

LIQ

UO

R L

ICE

NS

E

550

650

550

650

DO

G L

ICE

NS

E

2,8

00

2,9

60

2,8

00

2,8

00

HU

NT

ING

& F

ISH

ING

LIC

EN

SE

S

12,5

00

8,7

78

12,5

00

45

0

PE

DD

LE

R L

ICE

NS

E

15

05

050

50

FL

EE

T P

ER

MIT

750

--

-

BU

ILD

ING

/D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

PE

RM

ITS

13,0

00

15

,370

13,0

00

13

,000

LA

ND

PO

ST

ING

PE

RM

IT

250

260

250

250

TO

TA

L L

IC

EN

SE

& P

ER

MIT

RE

VE

NU

E

30

,00

0$

28

,06

8$

29

,15

0$

17,2

00

$

-40

.99

%

IN

TE

RG

OV

ER

NM

EN

TA

L R

EV

EN

UE

VT

HIW

AY

GA

S T

AX

14

8,6

30

$

14

8,3

92

$

148

,39

2$

14

8,0

00

$

VT

AC

T 6

0

15,0

00

15

,077

15,0

00

15

,000

ST

. O

F V

T. L

IST

ER

TR

AIN

ING

-3

98

-4

00

PIL

OT

Pay

men

ts17

,400

22,6

6118

,870

18,8

70

VT

NA

TU

RA

L R

ES

RC

S

4,7

82

-4

,130

4,1

30

ED

UC

AT

ION

TA

X

RE

TA

INE

R12

,100

11,5

28

11,5

55

18,0

00

TO

TA

L I

NT

ER

GO

VE

RN

ME

NT

AL

RE

VE

NU

E

197,9

12$

19

8,0

56

$

19

7,9

47$

2

04

,40

0$

3

.26

%

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich R

eve

nue R

eport

– F

Y 2

008

Page 14: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–14

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich R

eve

nue R

eport

– F

Y 2

008

FY

- 2007

FY

- 2007

FY

- 2008

FY

- 2009

FY

- 08/09

FIN

AL

ES

T.*

AC

TU

AL

ES

TIM

AT

EE

ST

IMA

TE

% C

HA

NG

E

SE

RV

IC

E F

EE

RE

VE

NU

E

RE

CO

RD

ING

FE

E

25,0

00

$

21,2

03

$

2

2,0

00

$

24

,00

0$

RE

ST

OR

AT

ION

4,0

00

3,5

35

3,7

50

6,0

00

DO

CU

ME

NT

CO

PY

FE

E

2,0

00

2,1

312,0

00

2,0

00

US

E O

F R

EC

RD

S F

EE

350

426

350

400

VIT

AL

ST

AT

IST

IC F

EE

1,

200

1,136

1,200

400

MO

TO

R V

EH

ICL

E R

EN

EW

AL

FE

E

550

378

550

400

PH

OT

OC

OP

YIN

G F

EE

200

726

400

400

PAS

SP

OR

T

65

02

,04

01,

00

05

00

TR

AC

Y H

AL

L R

EN

TA

L F

EE

7,0

00

6,9

56

7,0

00

7,7

00

PO

LIC

E R

EP

OR

T F

EE

500

611

500

500

PO

LIC

E A

LA

RM

RE

SP

ON

SE

FE

E

300

-700

700

SP

EC

IAL

PO

LIC

E D

UT

Y F

EE

S1,

000

1,67

21,

000

1,000

PL

AN

NIN

G D

OC

CO

PY

FE

E

150

69

150

150

RE

CR

EA

TIO

N P

RO

GR

AM

FE

ES

17

7,0

00

133,2

60

115,0

00

135,0

00

TR

AN

SF

ER

ST

AT

ION

ST

ICK

ER

S-

139

150

150

HA

RT

FO

RD

SO

LID

WA

ST

E S

TIC

KE

R

2,0

00

1,993

2,0

00

-

RE

CY

CL

ING

SO

LID

WA

ST

E F

EE

S1,

000

23,9

1822,5

00

22,5

00

TR

AS

H C

OU

PO

N

60,0

00

63,8

89

55,0

00

100,0

00

HA

RT

FO

RD

SO

LID

WA

ST

E C

OU

PO

NS

9,0

00

7,2

98

9,0

00

-

TO

TA

L S

ER

VIC

E F

EE

RE

VE

NU

E2

91,9

00

$

271,

378

$

24

4,2

50

$

301

,80

0$

2

3.5

6%

GR

AN

T R

EV

EN

UE

HIG

HW

AY

BR

IDG

E G

RA

NT

151

,20

0$

151

,20

0$

120

,00

0$

122

,40

0$

FE

MA

MIT

IGA

TIO

N G

RA

NT

-6,8

57-

-

PL

AN

NIN

G G

RA

NT

8,0

00

5,4

00

--

ST

OF

VT

-BIK

E &

PE

DE

GR

AN

T-

5,0

60

--

INF

RA

ST

RU

CT

UR

E S

UR

VE

Y G

RA

NT

-6,5

00

--

CO

NS

ER

V C

OM

M G

RA

NT

5,0

00

--

-

05 S

T. O

F V

T L

AW

EN

FO

RC

E G

RA

NT

-1,

991

--

06 H

ML

ND

SE

CU

RIT

Y G

RA

NT

5,4

00

5,1

76-

-

TO

TA

L G

RA

NT

RE

VE

NU

E16

9,6

00

$

18

2,1

83

$

120

,00

0$

122

,40

0$

2

.00

%

Page 15: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–15

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich R

eve

nue R

eport

– F

Y 2

008

FY

- 2007

FY

- 2007

FY

- 2008

FY

- 2009

FY

- 08/09

FIN

AL

ES

T.*

AC

TU

AL

ES

TIM

AT

EE

ST

IMA

TE

% C

HA

NG

E

OT

HE

R T

OW

N R

EV

EN

UE

S

TO

WN

RE

PO

RT

1,500

1,394

1,500

1,500

BA

NK

IN

TE

RE

ST

32,0

00

80,1

05

80,0

00

60,0

00

TR

AN

SF

ER

IN

FR

OM

DE

SIG

NA

TE

D F

UN

D-

-5,0

00

46,7

96

AT

HL

ET

IC F

IEL

D R

EN

TA

L

8,3

00

10,2

25

10,0

00

9,0

00

TO

TA

L O

TH

ER

TO

WN

RE

VE

NU

ES

41,8

00

$

91,7

24

$

9

6,5

00

$

117

,29

6$

21

.55

%

PU

BL

IC

SA

FE

TY

RE

VE

NU

ES

PO

LIC

E F

INE

31

,000

20,4

79

20,0

00

22,0

00

PAR

KIN

G F

INE

300

125

750

500

DO

G F

INE

2

00

54

20

02

00

TO

TA

L P

UB

LIC

SA

FE

TY

RE

VE

NU

ES

31,5

00

$

20

,65

8$

20

,95

0$

22

,70

0$

8.3

5%

MISC

EL

LA

NE

OU

S R

EV

EN

UE

DA

ILY

OV

ER

/S

HO

RT

-

$

(8

4)

$

-$

-

$

AM

BU

LA

NC

E R

EF

UN

D

-458

--

DO

NA

TIO

NS

-KE

EP

ING

TR

AC

K-

(936)

--

TO

WN

CL

ER

K

-50

--

FIN

AN

CE

DE

PT

-

2-

-

LIS

TE

R D

EP

T-

1-

-

PO

LIC

E D

EP

T

-2,2

69

--

CO

NS

ER

VA

TIO

N C

OM

M.

--

--

MIS

CE

LL

AN

EO

US

3,5

00

4,3

73

3,5

00

3,5

00

TO

TA

L M

ISC

EL

LA

NE

OU

S R

EV

EN

UE

3,5

00

$

6

,134

$

3,5

00

$

3

,50

0$

0

.00

%

TO

TA

L F

EE

S &

SE

RV

IC

ES

766,2

12$

79

8,2

00

$

712

,297

$

78

9,2

96

$

10

.81

%

AL

LO

WA

NC

E F

OR

TA

X A

DJU

ST

ME

NT

S*

(25,0

00)

(25,0

00)

(25,0

00)

TO

TA

L T

OW

N R

EV

EN

UE

S3,9

13,5

08

4,0

42,4

43

4,0

04,7

73

4,2

77,5

83

6.8

1%

* A

dju

sted

at

tim

e o

f se

ttin

g ta

x ra

te o

r w

hen

rec

eivi

ng

un

anti

cip

ated

gra

nts

; se

e E

xhib

it G

of

Ind

epen

den

t A

ud

ito

r's

Rep

ort

.

Page 16: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–16

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 17: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–17

Page 18: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–18

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 19: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–19

Page 20: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–20

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 21: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–21

Page 22: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–22

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 23: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–23

Page 24: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–24

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 25: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–25

Page 26: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–26

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 27: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–27

Page 28: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–28

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 29: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–29

Page 30: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–30

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 31: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–31

Page 32: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–32

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 33: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–33

Page 34: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–34

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 35: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–35

Page 36: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–36

Tow

n o

f N

orw

ich E

xpendit

ure

Budget

Report

– F

Y 2

008

Page 37: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–37

Page 38: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–38

Fu

nd

Nam

eB

alan

ceIn

tere

stT

ow

nD

on

atio

ns

&E

xp

ense

Exp

ense

Des

crip

tio

n B

alan

ceA

dd

itio

ns

Pro

po

sed

7/1

/06

Inco

me

Ap

pro

pri

atio

nO

ther

In

com

e 6

/30/2

007

FY

07/0

8A

dd

itio

ns

08-0

9

Aff

ord

able

Ho

usi

ng

45,2

10$

72

2$

-$

250

$

-$

46,1

82

$

-$

-$

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Co

mm

.99,9

73

5,2

95

4,2

70

109,5

38

-

Co

rrid

or

En

han

cem

ent

27,3

24

415

2,1

65

Co

nsu

ltan

ts25,5

74-

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

s P

roje

ct15,0

00

Fir

e A

pp

arat

us

(51,

30

2)

194

95

,00

05

,55

0F

ix U

p F

ore

stry

Un

it3

8,3

42

95

,00

09

5,0

00

Fir

e E

qu

ipm

ent

-68

10,0

00

10,0

68

20,0

00

20,0

00

Fir

e S

tati

on

60

7,5

00

3,9

91C

on

sult

ants

Pu

bli

c S

afet

y F

acil

ity

3,5

69

-

Fir

e T

rain

ing

Fac

ilit

y12

,361

261

5,5

50

Pay

men

t o

f lo

an t

o F

ire

Ap

par

atu

s F

un

d18

,172

-

Gaz

ebo

Fu

nd

5,0

00

1,500

6,5

00

5,0

00

-

Gen

eral

Ad

min

istr

atio

n2

,221

511,

00

027

Ch

ecks

3,2

45

1,0

00

-

Hig

hw

ay E

qu

ipm

ent

146,9

86

1,74

290,0

00

194,9

60

Ch

evro

let

Tru

ck &

Cab

, F

reig

htl

iner

Tru

ck &

Cab

43,7

68

115,0

00

119,0

00

Hig

hw

ay G

arag

e80,9

39

1,269

82,2

08

-

Kid

s &

Co

ps

Fu

nd

863

2865

-

Lan

d M

anag

emen

t C

ou

nci

l1,

764

148

00

977

Gra

vel

for

Tra

il P

arkin

g L

ot

1,602

-

Lo

ng

Ter

m F

acil

ity

Stu

dy

10,0

00

-

Po

lice

Cru

iser

1610

115

,00

03

00

15

,417

25

,00

0

Po

lice

Sp

ecia

l E

qu

ip.

266

11,

000

925

Cro

ssw

alk S

ign

s342

1,500

1,200

Po

lice

Sta

tio

n6,0

1416

210

,000

1,632

New

Ch

ief

Off

ice

14,5

45

5,0

00

2,5

00

Rec

reat

ion

76,1

48

1,11

41,

125

7,4

42

Pla

ygro

un

d C

abin

, S

ign

s70,9

46

-

Ro

ute

132 R

eser

ve

4,9

148

04,9

94

-

Sid

ewal

k F

un

d16

625,0

00

25,1

66

25,0

00

14,0

00

So

lid

Was

te

8,3

59

220

17,0

00

1,835

Ele

ctri

cal

Wo

rk &

New

Hea

ter

23,7

45

2,5

00

-

Ten

nis

Co

urt

s1,

812

48

2,0

00

3,8

60

2,0

00

2,0

00

Tow

n C

lerk

Eq

uip

men

t5,0

63

92

1,000

6,1

55

1,000

-

Tow

n M

anag

er V

ehic

le6

,25

06

,25

0

Tow

n P

oo

l F

un

d6,4

5796

6,5

53

5,0

00

4,5

00

Tow

n R

eap

pra

isal

19,8

32

476

25

,00

045,3

08

25,0

00

15,0

00

Tra

cy H

all

6,7

6718

76

4,2

00

53,6

16Pai

nti

ng,

Gym

Flo

or,

Tel

eph

on

e S

yste

m17

,538

10,0

00

-

Tota

l47

5,3

88

$

12,1

74$

368,7

00

$

13,7

95

$

273,1

19

$

62

4,2

00

$

32

9,2

50

$

319

,45

0$

Desi

gnate

d &

Specia

l P

urp

ose

Funds

Page 39: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–39

Norwich Trust FundsBalances

Balances July 1, 2006 June 30, 2007

Perpetual Care 67,993.39$ 107,009.06$

Sales of Cemetery Lots 71,284.87 81,814.04

Union Village Cemetery Perpetual Care - 31,000.00

New Boston Cemetery 762.13 762.13

Beaver Meadow Cemetery 53.93 53.93

Minister Gospel Lease Land 600.00 600.00

School Lease Land 465.00 465.00

Emma Hatch 900.00 900.00

Arlura Grant Memorial 100.00 100.44

WCTU Fountain 906.68 957.54

Land Management Council 2,278.56 2,311.16

Corridor Tree Fund 75.10 125.54

Main Street Flags 453.20 445.62

Total 145,872.86$ 226,544.46$

RECONCILIATION STATEMENT

Balance - July 1, 2006 145,872.86$

Additions:

Interest on Cemetery(TRUST) Funds 7,915.74

Sale of Cemetery Lots 10,500.00

Union Village Cemetery Association Funds 31,000.00

Return of Hillside Expansion Funds for investment 35,000.00

Corridor Tree Fund Donations 50.00

Interest on WCTU Fountain 50.86

Interest on Land Management Council Funds 32.60

Interest on Main Street Flag Fund 1.81

Interest on Corridor Tree/Alura Grant Funds 0.88

Sub-total 84,551.89

Payments:

Norwich Cemetery Commissioners-Interest on PC 3,870.90

Main Street Flags - Repairs & Maintenance 9.39

Sub-total (3,880.29)

Balance - June 30, 2007 226,544.46$

INVESTMENTS

Perpetual Care, Savings Account, Mascoma Savings Bank 446.80$

Sale of Lots, Savings Account, Mascoma Savings Bank 312.48

Corridor Tree Fund/Alura Grant Savings Acct Mascoma Savings Bank 225.98

Perpetual Care, Certificate of Deposit, 5.4%,Lake Sunapee Bank 106,300.86

Sale of Lots, Certificate of Deposit, 5.4%,Lake Sunapee Bank 116,501.56

Land Management Council, Public Funds Acct, Citizens Bank 2,311.16

Main Street Flags Savings Acct, Mascoma Savings Bank 445.62$

Total Investments 226,544.46$

Cheryl A. Lindberg, Barbara C. Merrill, Marie Elise Young - Trustees

Page 40: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

Town of Norwich Financial StatementsJune 30, 2007

Town Auditors’ ReportOnce again, the entire report of our independent auditor, Fothergill, Segale & Valley, is

printed in the Town Report on the following pages. We have determined that the report rep-resents a fair presentation of the finances of the Town of Norwich.

Henry Scheier (Chair), and Karen Kayen

Town Treasurer’s ReportThe Town Treasurer statutory duties include: paying orders authorized by the

Selectboard, School Board, and Cemetery Commissioners; investing moneys with theapproval of the legislative body; appointing an Assistant Treasurer; serving on the Board ofAbatement; and, in our Town, being a member of the Norwich and Dresden FinanceCommittees. The Town Manager and Treasurer work together to ensure that the financialresponsibilities of the Town are met.

The General Fund of the Town ended FY07 with a surplus of revenues over expenditures.Exhibit G of the Independent Auditor’s Report (pg. I-57) identifies the categories that wereover and under budget for the year. The “Budget Amendments” column reflects an unantic-ipated grant approved by the Selectboard during the fiscal year. Revenues that were signifi-cantly under budget were Public Service Fees, and the one significantly over budget wasInvestment Income. In total, Revenues were $96,779 over budget. Actual expenditures wereunder budget in all the Town departments. Total Expenditures were under budget by$210,504. When added to the favorable variance in total revenues, the year ended with anexcess of Revenues over Expenditures of $307,283. The GAAP version of this informationis Exhibit E (pg. I-55).

During the past year I have attended many Town/School/Dresden board meetings,Finance Committee meetings and Vermont Treasurer events. I am serving the second yearof a two-year term as Chair of the Dresden Finance Committee. I continue to serve on theExecutive Board of the Vermont Government Financial Officers Association (GFOA). andin September of 2007 Vermont hosted the New England GFOA Annual Meeting. I waselected Treasurer of the Dresden School District in March 2007 and became the firstVermonter to hold this position.

I would like to express my appreciation to those elected officials who serve our Town andthank the residents of Norwich for your continued involvement in our Town government.

Cheryl A. Lindberg, Treasurer (649-1678)

I–40

Page 41: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–41

Independent Auditor’s Report

Page 42: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–42

Page 43: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–43

Page 44: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–44

Page 45: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–45

Page 46: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–46

Page 47: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–47

Page 48: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–48

Page 49: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–49

Page 50: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–50

Page 51: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–51

Page 52: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–52

Page 53: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–53

Page 54: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–54

Page 55: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–55

Page 56: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–56

Page 57: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–57

Page 58: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–58

Page 59: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–59

Page 60: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–60

Page 61: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–61

Page 62: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–62

Page 63: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–63

Page 64: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–64

Page 65: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–65

Page 66: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–66

Page 67: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–67

Page 68: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–68

Page 69: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–69

Page 70: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–70

Page 71: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–71

Page 72: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–72

Page 73: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–73

Page 74: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–74

Page 75: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–75

Page 76: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–76

Page 77: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–77

Page 78: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–78

Page 79: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–79

Page 80: Part I - Norwich, Vermontnorwich.vt.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fiscal2007... · 2014. 10. 22. · I–5 expense is up 500%, which is up from last years $30,000. This is for bridge

I–80

1 Norwich School District . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8,503,202.00 51 Atlantic Broom Service Inc . . . . . . . . .8,687.79 2 Vermont State Treasurer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .726,423.00 52 State of Vermont (Fish & Wildlife) . . .8,430.00 3 Town of Norwich Designated Funds . . . . .363,700.00 53 DesMeules Olmstead & Ostler . . . . . .8,292.75 4 Winterset Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .179,000.00 54 Regina Anne Owens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8,113.08 5 Bank of New York Trust Co, NA . . . . . . . .140,291.98 55 Sabil & Sons Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8,107.28 6 Norwich Public Library Association . . . . . .135,000.00 56 Norwich Historical Society . . . . . . . . .8,000.00 7 All States Asphalt, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .123,160.50 57 Gateway Motors Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7,971.21 8 CGLIC - Hookset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .119,063.12 58 Vaughn Floors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7,750.00 9 Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Vermont . . . . . .104,370.40 59 Countrywide Financial . . . . . . . . . . . .7,653.70 10 Northeast Waste Services Ltd . . . . . . . . . . . .98,194.23 60 RJ Turner Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7,649.00 11 Blaktop Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .87,776.61 61 Northland Specialties, Inc. . . . . . . . . .7,550.00 12 Vmers DB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79,408.64 62 Advance Transit Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7,311.00 13 Freightliner of New Hampshire, Inc. . . . . . .64,896.57 63 Key Communications Inc. . . . . . . . . . .7,295.80 14 Windsor County Treasurer . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54,006.22 64 ARC Mechanical Contractors Inc. . . .7,088.36 15 American Rock Salt Co., LLC . . . . . . . . . . .53,344.54 65 Fred M. Spaulding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7,010.00 16 VLCT Property & Casualty Inter Fund . . . .52,286.22 66 Bergeron Protective Clothing . . . . . . . .6,533.57 17 Vermont League of Cities and Towns (VLCT)51,112.50 67 U I Insurance Services . . . . . . . . . . . . .6,083.00 18 Town of Hanover Parking Division . . . . . . . .49,983.00 68 Youth In Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6,000.00 19 Evans Motor Fuels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47,842.34 69 LHS Associates Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5,641.30 20 Cody Chevrolet Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47,543.70 70 Resource Systems Group . . . . . . . . . . .5,622.04 21 Towle Excavating Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46,346.15 71 Staples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5,475.37 22 Twin State Sand & Gravel . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45,628.07 72 White River Council on Aging . . . . . .5,300.00 23 Town of Hartford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41,166.25 73 K.R. Nott Trucking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5,280.00 24 Ledgeworks, Inc. dba Home Partners . . . . . .40,007.59 74 Glenn Gurman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5,124.00 25 Vermont Dept. of Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33,480.84 75 A C Lawnmowing & Snowplowing . . .5,120.00 26 Tenco New England Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32,892.52 76 Kibby Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5,075.13 27 Grtr Uppr Vlly Solid Waste Mgt Dist . . . . . .30,514.00 77 Marcon Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5,000.00 28 Daniel S. Clay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28,538.86 78 Landvest, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5,000.00 29 Green Mountain Power Corp . . . . . . . . . . . .26,832.59 79 Fred Smith Lawn Service . . . . . . . . . . .4,926.78 30 Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A. . . . . . . .25,000.00 80 Fire Tech & Safety of New England . .4,888.23 31 Office of Child Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18,645.36 81 Leo Maslan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4,595.50 32 Southworth-Milton Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18,513.69 82 Unicel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4,396.20 33 Hanover Ambulance Service . . . . . . . . . . . . .17,694.98 83 Unifirst Corp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4,379.38 34 Irving Oil Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15,559.16 84 Fogg’s True Value Hardware . . . . . . . . .4,182.31 35 Nicom Coatings Corp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15,000.00 85 Pitney Bowes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4,141.91 36 The Radio North Group Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . .13,829.74 86 Monte Verde Gardening . . . . . . . . . . . .4,121.00 37 Unum Life Insurance Co. of America . . . . . .13,210.35 87 Christina Gelsone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4,000.00 38 Verizon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12,875.13 88 Black River Design Architects, PLC . . .3,991.38 39 Visiting Nurse Alliance of VT/NH . . . . . . . .12,213.00 89 Two Rivers - Ottauquechee . . . . . . . . .3,916.00 40 Norwich Cemetery Commission . . . . . . . . . .12,200.00 90 Valley News . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3,835.83 41 Pike Industries Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12,052.25 91 Lettie Arnold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3,807.30 42 Pete’s Tire Barns, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11,916.97 92 Saf T Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3,802.00 43 Totally Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11,052.00 93 Elevator Sales & Service . . . . . . . . . . .3,780.06 44 Sullivan Powers & Co . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11,012.00 94 Staples Business Advantage . . . . . . . . .3,677.61 45 Giddings Mfg Co Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10,636.10 95 Mascoma Savings Bank . . . . . . . . . . . .3,567.48 46 Slapstick Science Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10,350.00 96 River Road Veterinary . . . . . . . . . . . . .3,368.94 47 Norwich Fire District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10,323.66 97 Sigma Systems Technology Inc . . . . . .3,350.00 48 B & R’s Garage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8,754.12 98 The Ryvnine School of Fencing . . . . . .3,338.00 49 Suburban Energy Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8,745.94 99 Whitman Communications Inc . . . . . .3,310.56 50 Vmers DC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8,738.98 100 Brady & Callahan, P.C. . . . . . . . . . . . .3,237.50

Top Payees Fiscal Year 2007 Paid at least $3,200 during the fiscal year • Prepared by Norwich Town Auditors