Upload
marta-elefterijadis
View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Studio Air Semester 1, 2015 University of Melbourne
Citation preview
AirPArt B marta elefterijadis|Air
marta elefterijadis|Air
geometry
I have chosen to focus on Geometry as my
research field, as this is a field that offers a
look into the constructability of the
designed form, and how this - despite it
being considered to have quite a minimal
surface and rigid form - can influence both
the materiality and sustainability factor of
the overall design. I believe that this is a
fundamental way of not only utilising
computational software for the purposes of
this project, but also of seeing what can be
achieved using digital fabrication
processes.
marta elefterijadis|AirGreen Void
LAVA
Sydney, Australia
2008
This project consists of a 3D lightweightstructure focused on exhibiting minimalsurface tension capabilities within an indoorvoid of 20m in height1. This is particularlyinteresting as it highlights the object’s abilityto be sustainable and use a minimalamount of materials and time forfabrication in order to produce maximumvisual and aesthetic effect within a largespace.
In this case while the form is not quite rigid,the framing and skeletal structure of theobejct gives the main say on the types ofmaterials able to be used, as well as limitingthis to materials that will achieve minimalsurface area and maximal volume. As such,the Green Void is a structure made out ofspecially treated hight-tech Nylon (withlighting elements), giving it a surface areaof 300 sqm, and a total volume of ten timesits surface area, in other words, 3000 cubicm 2.
This achievemnt can be seen to have beenachieved primarily through the use ofparametric modelling and design in thefield of Geometry, and the playing aroundor manipulation of it. c
ase
stu
dy
1.0
speies 1:ExoskeletonSize of nodesRelaxed mesh
species 2:ExoskeletonDifferent geometryNumber of linesRelaxed mesh
species 3:ExoskeletonThicknessSize of nodes
marta elefterijadis|Air
case
study1.0
marta elefterijadis|Airspeies 4:Mesh + Kangaroo meshRest lengthDifferent geometry
species 6:Facet dome + Kangaroo meshDifferent geometryNumber of points
species 5:Voronoi + Kangaroo meshDifferent geometryNumber of points
case
study1.0
marta elefterijadis|Air
4 best iterations
case
study1.0
marta elefterijadis|AirOlympiastadionGunther Behnisch &Frei OttoMunich, Germany1972
The Munich Olympic Stadium, known as the Olympiastadionin German was a revolutionary structure in its day, utilisingalgorythmic geometry along with the use of materials suchas acrylic glass and steel cables for its canopy.The canopy in particular was designed to simulate the formof the Swiss Alps, and to mimic their peaks and undulationsin its geometry.
By using lightweight materials in its design, the canopy wasable to achieve a hierarchy of volumes underneath it as wellas a variation of space amongs the seating sections.Besides providing shelter for spectators, the canopy’s use ofpredominantly transparent materials allows for a connectionwith the outside as well as with the rest of the Olympic parksurrounding the structure.
The canopy was constructed as stated above usinglightweight acrylic glass and steel cables, which weremounted on large steel poles in order to hold the canopy up.Working predominantly with tensile forces, the canopy is anexcellent example of a type of almost rigid mesh relaxationtechnique on a large scale, while the use of the engineerOtto’salgorythmic designs allowed for a more controlled outcomeof the fabrication processes, something that was innovativefor its time.
Such a structure achieves complex and dynamic form in itsdesign, while also creating a new sense of ornamentalismthrough geometric design. ca
sestudy2.0
marta elefterijadis|Air
reverseen
gineering
marta elefterijadis|Air
case
study2.0
marta elefterijadis|Air
case
study2.0
4 best iterations
marta elefterijadis|AirSource: http://www.jeavons.net.au/services.html
0 50 100
Nmetres
source: google maps
2015SITE MAP
chosen site:Clifton Hill railway bridgeSouth bank of Merri Creek at chosen site
KEY REASONS FOR SITE CHOICE:
• Accessible to a wide range of people due
to proximity to main road, housing estates
and train stations.
• Already a widely used skate park on theother side of creek – wide exposure – and
may bring more from different target
audiences.
• Adversely, the specific areas on site to be
used have been underutilised unlike the
skate park.
• Opportunity to hang and anchor design
from many points of both the bridge and
the staircases/supporting structure.
• Opportunity to incorporate the built and
natural environments present on site.
marta elefterijadis|Air
marta elefterijadis|Airunwoven lightsoo sunny park2013Using wire mesh and inset panels of translucent,coloured plexiglas, this design demonstrates thepotential of something as rigid as wire mesh informing quite flowing geometric shapes, whichthen allow for the play of light to occur incombination with the plexiglas as mentioned.
articulated tensionsuniversity of calgary2013Constructed out of a series of panel elements inorder to create a relaxed mesh form, this projectaims to explore the relationships betweengeometry, performance, organization andfabrication of the work as a whole.
marta elefterijadis|Airprototype:Prototype created in a shellgeometry, designed to mimic anopen cocoon shape. Designshould be anchored on threepoints to above bridge trusses.
elements/materiality:Created out of 0.5mm acrylicelements in three differentshapes: an X, a Y and an Ishape. Held together usingsplitter pins, to give rotationalability while still retaining anelement of rigidity givepredominantly from theindividual acrylic pieces.
conceptual inspiration
• Interest: Concept of creating a pliable relaxed mesh surface out of individual and quite rigid elements in order to form the resulting geometry of the project.
• Reasons for choice:
- Durability
- Further play with geometry of individual elements
- Materiality
marta elefterijadis|Air