Part 28. A Resurrection of Life & of Judgement

8/7/2019 Part 28. A Resurrection of Life & of Judgement.

1/12

''Christ the Antidote Regarding Death''

CHRIST THE ANTIDOTE REGARDING DEATH

Part 28.

A Resurrection Of Life, And Of Judgement!

Some of our many readers were querying a statement that we made in our last article Part 27 as regardsthe resurrection in !ohn "#28$2%. & wish now with the hel of the Sirit of (od to gi)e you the *hird

Realm understanding of what we were stating we ha)e touched on this +efore. & would li,e to say at the

outset of this discourse - as many of us are aware of - that in the translating of many words - )erses the

emhasis has +een on the ercetion of the translators at their way of seeing things at that time. /or

instance the word DA01A*&1 at the end of the 2%th)erse in the 3!4 is not only o)er$stressed for in the

light of the original conte5t it is out of conte5t. n my comuter & ha)e access to 62 translations - only

two of them render the word DA01A*&1 - that is the 3!4 - e+ster's the maority render

!9D(:0:1*hy; fields treasures storehouses shee

goats mountains seas fo5es - so it goes on all to show us ictures or illustrations. ?et us now loo, at

the (ree, literal word translation of these two )erses.

!ohn "#28$2%. (3. ''Not wonder you this; because comes an hour, in which all those in the tombs,

shall hear the voice of him, 2% and shall come forth, those the good things having done, to a

resurrection of life; those and the evil things having done, to a resurrection of udgement'' ?et us see

if we can cast some *A


2/12


death. A reco"ery o# on%er#u$ spiritu$ trut)


3/12


/ithin Ourselves!

*he resurrection is actually in the 3ingdom of (od &*=&1 it is +oth theRA&S&1( 9Pof our *rue

&dentity - the !9D(:0:1* of our 0ista,en &dentity. e ha)e +een sharing the truth of the 0an of our

0ista,en &dentity +eing in the *emle in the lace where he ought not to +e. &n this resurrection it is a

coming out of the dead lace or in other words the tombs - coming into a li)ely lace of Resurrection

life. hen we sea, of the o$% mn dying two things are haening. . &t is a ceding or surrendering ofour to date self will which entails +oth the mind - soul which is our mista,en self$identity. 2. &t is at the

same time a merging of ourfalse or mistaen selvesinto the *rue Christ &dentity which is at the same

time as dying it is also +eing recreated - new life +eing a+sor+ed a !ouble e!"e! swor! if you lie. 1ow

& am going to share something quite wonderful with you. &f anything has the ring of truth to it & will

always search it out. hen & left the organisation connected to the in prtre$m & determined that &

would ne)er again +e +ound +y man's idea or tradition. /or a while now & ha)e +ecome )ery interested in

Te Gospe$ o# Toms) &f we recall !esus aid secial attention to *homas - & +elie)e that he came

through wonderfully. *here are some amaHing dee *hird Day gems in this unadulterated +oo,. & will not

go into the history of it for it would ta,e to much time +ut & will let it sea, for itself. &t was first written

in (ree, it was then written in Cotic an :gytian language influenced +y (ree,. *homas inaugurated a

Church in &ndia - is suosedly still in e5istence today. Please ,ee in mind that when we read the

translation of any other language the grammar the idiom - the way of hrasing is always different to our

:nglish way of thin,ing - sea,ing. Plus this was written almost two centuries ago. *he oint that &

wish to ma,e is that +ecause of our ast :nglish estern way of thin,ing which was influenced +y the

fallen Church of the dar, ages a lot of the original thin,ing of the day of !esus has +een lost +ut raise

the ?ord we ha)e +een romised a C0P?:*: R:S*RA*&1 / A?? *=&1(S. And this & +elie)e is one

of the many hels. 1ow you may disagree - that is your rerogati)e +ut lease allow me the same

ri)ilege that & am granting you.

*he *wo 9ecoming One

According to *he 9oo of *homas

,esus si%- ''ON THE DA. .O/ 0ERE ONE .O/ CREATED THE T0O& B/T THEN BEING

T0O 0HAT 0I11 .O/ DO2'' *homas. #E$6.

*his is no dou+t referring to :)e eating from the tree of (ood - :)il - then gi)ing it to Adam.

here is this di)ision of the two; ithin us of courseF hen man,ind first went into duality he thought

that he was lost. hat was the answer; *he answer of course is that he needs to +ecome 1: again. *he

duality is not ust an eating from the tree of - "oo! & evil +ut within us are two trees or two identities

-eepin" in min! that the ori"inal 56V containe! a foot note to the effect that the first three chapters of

,enesis were myths or as we woul! say to!ay metaphors & were not factual-the conflict lies in the fact

that the @tree of "oo! & evil or our mista,en $oer i%entityis at loggerheads with the @tree of life

our true iger Crist i%entity & &*=&1 9S. ':ou are a gardenenclosed' Song of Sol. #2 #6. &sa "8#. !er 6#2. ?et us comare this with the following )erse.

''/hoever finds his 6lower7 life will lose it 6the higher life7, and whoever loses his 6lower7 life on

&y account will find it 6the higher life7'' 0at E#6%. A0P. *his )erse is self e5lanatory when

comaring it with the a+o)e )erse.

,esus si%- ''0HEN .O/ MA3E THE T0O ONE& AND .O/ MA3E THE INNER AS THE

O/TER& AND THE O/TER AS THE INNER& AND THE ABO+E AS BE1O0& SO THAT .O/

0I11 MA3E THE MA1E 4 THE 5EMA1E INTO A SING1E ONE& IN ORDER THAT THE

MA1E IS NOT MADE MA1E NOR THE 5EMA1E MADE 5EMA1E-'' *homas. 22#%$.

*his & +elie)e is referring to our true Christ self - the 0ista,en self the inner - the outer. *he Christ

Spirit is - male- - the soul pneum- female- are to +ecome merged until they are one - the same. *he

6


4/12


5/12


1I+E)'' *homas. #$6.

=ere we see again the two one will die or +e a+sor+ed into the other. *he following )erse is from the

1ew *estament.

''> am saying to you, in this night there will be */O on one couch; the one shall be taen along

and the other shall be left? ?u,e 7#6.C?4.

''> say to you3 >n this the night will be two on bed one; one will be taen, and the other will be left''?u,e 7#6(3.

1otice that the original does not mention a man or woman or erson. *he 3!4- se)eral other

translations ha)e also +een tamered with +ut in most of the more recent translations they are now

,eeing to the original descrition.... * =A*; &dentities> our =igher - our ?ower self. *shall

+e in the one erson on one couchFF *he one shall +e ta,en comaring it with the a+o)e )erse. 9sually

this has +een interreted to fit into the rature theory - thought to mean that there were two eole in a

+ed the good one flies u into the air for a eriod of time while the other is left to face the music - ha)e

a terri+le time - those who ha)e +een floating away u in the clouds somewhere return when it is all

o)er to reoice. & want to say to all that this is a terri+le error if e)er there was a time when the sons o#

Go%will +e needed in this world it will +e in the soon dar, times. *his is where we will see in action

''/here sin abounds grace does abound much, much more'' *he true interretation of the a+o)e

assage - & I am not the only one that believes this either - is this. *his is actually referring to our two

entities +oth our @true $hrist i!entity & our mistaen or lower self in one erson. 1:identity will +e

ta,en a+sor+ed changed - in this soon time when those who ha)e +een 'waling in the light as )e is

in the light' the culmination of what (od has +een saying to many of us will ta,e effect - there will +e a

catchin" away - many will +e '%aught u"' into a higher e5erience - it will +e the time that the

mistaen i!entity will +e fully merged into the $hrist i!entity - in so doing in this merging the o$% mn

D&:S - in the dying will also ut on incorruti+ility as we ha)e +een romised. 1ow what many find

hard to understand is that if the mistaen i!entitydies how can it li)e; *he answer of course is that in

the dying to itself it is a+sor+ed into the Christ self - gains a =igher realm of change a =?G (D?G

D&4&1:e5erience.) thou"ht for my precious brothers & sisters who hol! to other un!erstan!in"s of scripture this is not

meant to be conclusive as truth is ever revealin". 9ith respect & without bein" too simplistic on comple:

issues I woul! submit this biblical point of view as a le"itimate ible base! un!erstan!in" worthy of

open & impartial consi!eration. Even thou"h we may have to a"ree to !isa"ree this interpretation

cannot be !iscounte! as not havin" scriptural cre!ibility & inte"rity.

''(o let those 6of us7 who are s"iritually mature and full.grown have this mind and hold these

convictions; and if in any res"ect you have a different attitude of mind, +od will mae that clear to

you also'' Phil 6#". A0P.

@welling >n *he (ecret 1lace!

As we ha)e mentioned +efore that there are three Realms - also three le)els of interretation in the

scriture let us consider once again the highest or *he 0ost =oly Place asect of this te5t.

'')e that dwells in the secret "lace of the most )igh shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty''

Psa %# 3!4. *he first thing that & want to say is that this wonderful e5erience is a)aila+le only

through - +y the grce of (od =e is the ne that leads us to disco)er this 2ecret (lace. *he second

thing that & wish to share is that there is a choiceFF =e that dwellsF =e that li)es> he that wishes to li)e

there or to dwell if we dwell on something we ,ee our mind on it. Someone said +ut we cannot li)e in

this lace unless (od calls us into it yes assuredly so +ut we do ha)e a choice if we wish to stay there.

'&any are called but few are chosen' hy is this so; & do ha)e a choice as to where & li)e stay$dwell

in. =e that wishes to dwell in thesecret place of Te Most Hig or Ho$y) e ha)e a conundrum on

one hand we ha)e some in a low realm are saying the de)il made me do it or ''whatever'' - on the other

"


6/12


hand many in a higher realm are saying that (od didn't ma,e me do it or ma!e me able to !well in the

2ecret (lace.


7/12


hen we read Scriture - ha)e a greater confidence in our own understanding of Scriture than in

the Scriture itself we ,now that the man of our @mistaen i!entity is sitting on the throne.*his tye

of resumtion needs to +e re)ealed in us where we are own lords rather than !esus Christ. *his needs to

+e re)ealed +y *he Sirit. &t is no use me seeing it in you you need to see it for yourself. e also need to

ha)e re)ealed to us in that we are deri)ing our consciences from the eating of the tree of good - e)il

which is the source of death in all of man,ind. &t is also a tra of our carnal mind to ha)e a greater

confidence in our own understanding of (od than in (od =imself. ur faith in (od must must out weighour concet of =im. 0any sincere searchers who go no further than trying to access Christ solely within

themsel)es are lost in an elite form of searation - self$ism. ''>f we wal in the light as )e is in the

light we have fellowshi" with one another # the blood of Jesus %hrist cleanses us from all sin'' !n

#7. 03!4.

%laiming to be a god!

:He 28#2.C:4.''Beiel, son of man, tell the ing of *yre that > am saying3 :ou are so arrogant that

you thin you're a god and that the city of *yre is your throne :ou may claim to be a god, though

you're nothing but a mere human''

Another thin line of danger is intellectualism this also can +e mista,en for sirituality +ecause we are

fast intellectually - more learned - ha)e all the answers at out finger tis does not necessarily denote

sirituality. & am reminded of the words of Paul not many mighty not many no+le +ut he has chosen the

wea, desised - foolish. *he 3ing of *yre really had tic,ets on himself +ut =is Creator quic,ly ulled

him down to siHe. ':ou may claim to be a god but you are very, very human' e need to +e reminded

that in scriture that there are two tye of gods - once again there is a seemingly )ery fine line +etween

the two. ne is wonderful - the other is far far from wonderful.

9e are to humble ourselves un!er the %i"hty han! of ,o! & if we !o He will e:alt us in !ue time. &n

these articles it is not so much in the winning of any oint or argument +ut are we heling each other to

draw closer to (od - =is urose. *here is seemingly a )ery good reason for doing away with the

efficacy of the did not ee" bac from declaring to you all the counsel of +od 28 *hen tae heed to

yourselves and to all the floc, in which the )oly ("irit "laced you as overseers, to she"herd the

assembly of +od which )e "urchased through )is own blood 2% $or > now this, that after my

de"arture grievous wolves will come in among you, not s"aring the floc; 6E and out of you

yourselves will rise u" men s"eaing "erverted things, in order to draw away the disci"les after

themselves'' +r their own particular way of thinin". Acts 2E#27$6E. ?&*4.

As with any error those who are under a decetion are totally con)inced that they are right - ofcourse their )ery con)incing ways does not in any way alter the su+tleness or insidiousness @that which

is more !an"erous than seems evi!ent of that which they ha)e em+raced. &n essence what some are

inferring is that we might as well throw away the


8/12


''9ut if we wal in the light, as )e is in the light, we have fellowshi" with one another, and the

blood of Jesus %hrist )is (on cleanses us from all sin'' !n #7. Remem+er how (od ga)e 0oses

secific instructions of how to +uild the *a+ernacle - how to enter it. ith this new way of thin,ing it

is really saying that (od did not gi)e 0oses instructions as the +lood sacrifice came from other cultures.

&t comletely undermines the word - ta,es away any confidence in it. And so to ma,e it fit it now

denigrates - infiltrates into the 1ew *estament. So if we do this where does that lea)e the truth as

regarding our ?ord !esus - =is sacrifice. 1o my +elo)ed friends we must ta,e a stand against thisinfiltration of terri+le error. /urthermore we read ''who serve the e8am"le and shadow of heavenly

things, as &oses was warned of +od when he was about to mae the tabernacle $or, )e says ?(ee

that you mae all things according to the "attern shown to you in the mountain? =e+ 8#". e are

told that what 0oses was gi)en was a S=AD or tye of the hea)enly things. here; in us. 1ow my

question is. Do we +elie)e that 0oses was warned of (od; &f we say that the +lood sacrifices were not

ordained of (od we are saying that what we are reading right now is a lie - that 0oses was not warned

of (od - if that is a fact then most e)erything that we read in the 1ew *estament is not to +e trusted.

A+solute ru++ishFF & say this with a care to all those who ha)e +een smeared with this teaching - also to

rotect those who may in the future ru+ u against it.

'')e was o""ressed, 6yet when7 )e was afflicted, )e was submissive and o"ened not )is mouth; lie

a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and as a shee" before her shearers is dumb, so )e o"ened not )is

mouth'' &sa "6#7 A0P. A lam+ denoting a +lood sacrifice. Isi+elie)ed it.

''*he ne8t day John saw Jesus coming to him and said, Loo! *here is the Lamb of +od, /ho taes

away the sin of the world!'' !ohn #2% A0P. 68od C43D;7 Also ,on te Bptistis of the same

oinion a lam+ which denotes a +lood sacrifice.

''And )e 6that same Jesus )imself7 is the "ro"itiation


9/12


''*hen Abraham too the wood for the burnt offering and laid it on 6the shoulders of7 >saac his

son, and he too the fire have

sworn by &yself, says the Lord, that since you have done this and have not withheld 6from &e7 or

begrudged 6giving &e7 your son, your only son,'' r +eing willing to offer him as a +urnt offering. *his

whole circumstance was instituted +y (od =imself. &f we thin, otherwise then we are really off course in

Chater 6# we see that A+raham had an altar from way +ac,. At that Altar he called on the name of the

?ord. &f we are still not con)inced then let us go right +ac, to the thchater of (enesis.

/ithout *he (hedding Of 9lood *here >s No Remission!

=e+.%#22.

>f we do not believe this then we are a follower of %ain!

e wonder why there are differences of oinion o)er this su+ect> hy; *he first murder was o)er this

)ery thing. hy;


10/12


glory of the Lord 6the (heinah cloud7 a""eared to all the "eo"le 6as "romised7 L?e). %#.M 2 *hen

there came a fire out from before the Lord and consumed the burnt offering and the fat on the altar;

and when all the "eo"le saw it, they shouted and fell on their faces'' Please do not try - tell me that

(od did not aro)e of the +lood sacrifices.

A (eeming %ontradiction!

Reveals A +odly 1rinci"le

Psa E#A0P. ''(acrifice and offering :ou do not desire, nor have :ou delight in them; :ou have

given me the ca"acity to hear and obey 6:our law, a more valuable service than7 burnt offerings and

sin offerings 6which7 :ou do not reuire''

Psa E#. C?4. ''(acrifice and a""roach "resent :ou do not desire, :et a body have :ou "re"aredfor me *he ascent a""roach and sin offering :ou do not as for? Get in seeming contradiction in the

following we read.

&sa "6#"$2. C?4. '':et )e was wounded because of our transgressions, and crushed because of our

de"ravities *he disci"line for our welfare was on )im, and by )is welts there is healing for us All

of us, as a floc.ling, have strayed; each man to his own way, we face, yet :ahweh, in )im, intercedesbecause of all our de"ravity? 7 )ard "ressed is )e and being humbled, yet )e is not o"ening )is

mouth As a floc.ling to slaughter is )e fetched, and as a ewe before her shearers is mute, so )e is

not o"ening )is mouth? 8$rom restraint and from udgement is )e taen, and on )is generation,

who shall meditateE $or )e was severed from the land of the living; because of the transgression of

&y "eo"le was )e touched by death %And )e is given )is tomb with the wiced, a cave from the

rich, in )is death $or )e does no wrong, and no deceit is in )is mouth, Eyet :ahweh desires to

crush )im, and )e causes )im to be wounded (hould you "lace )is soul for a guilt a""roach, )e

shall see a seed )e shall lengthen )is days, and the desire of :ahweh shall "ros"er in )is hand

$rom the toil of )is soul shall )e see light And )e shall be satisfied by )is nowledge &y righteous

(ervant shall ustify many, and with their de"ravities shall )e be burdened? 2 *herefore > will

a""ortion to )im among many, and to the staunch will )e a""ortion the loot, insomuch that )e givesu" )is soul unto death, and with transgressors was counted; and )e bore the sin of many, and for

transgressors is maing intercession?

1o true lo)ing father li,es to ma,e it hard on his son +ut of course disciline is a necessary thing

we ha)e to +e taught to learn. &n my oinion this is one of the main reasons that we ha)e so much

disresect among the resent generation. /irst Dr Soc, - now the welfare eole who condemn any

hands on disciline whatsoe)er. &n the nature of (od is +oth life - death we ha)e not yet fully

understood that death is a necessary e)il for out of death comes life. '8ce"t a grain of wheat is "lanted

# dies it abides alone' (od - from who the true lovin" father inherits his nature - realises that the

sacrifices that =e instigated himself are a thing that is needful - this is why read ''(acrifice and

a""roach "resent :ou do not desire, :et a body have :ou "re"ared for me'' ?et us read thiscontradictory )erse )ery closely e)en though (od did not desire sacrifice '':* @ a seemin"

contra!iction a body :ou have "re"ared for me *he ascent a""roach and sin offering :ou do not as

for? *he corresonding ne5t )erse which is found in =e+ e5lains the whole question erfectly.

*he %ontradiction %larified!

=e+ E#"$E.A0P. '')ence, when )e 6%hrist7 entered into the world, )e said, (acrifices and offerings

:ou have not desired, 'but instead' :ou have made ready a body for &e 6to offer7; >n burnt

offerings and sin offerings :ou have taen no delight 7 *hen > said, 9ehold, here > am, coming

to do ':our will, O +od'..6to fulfill7 what is written of &e in the volume of the 9ooLPs. E#$8.M8/hen )e said ust before, :ou have neither desired, nor have :ou taen delight in sacrifices and

offerings and burnt offerings and sin offerings..all of which are offered according to the Law.. %)e

then went on to say, 9ehold, 6here7 > am, coming to do :our will *hus )e does away with and

E


11/12


annuls the first trusted


12/12


he wrote about &e 6"ersonally7 7 9ut if you do not believe and trust his writings, how then will you

believe and trust &y teachingsE 6)ow shall you cleave to and rely on &y wordsE7''

9oth *he Jewish # +ree Attitudes!

Co #22$2". A0P. ''$or while Jews 6demandingly7 as for signs and miracles and +rees "ursue

"hiloso"hy and wisdom, 26 /e "reach %hrist

Documents

Part 28. A Resurrection of Life & of Judgement