Part 2 Physical Chemical Phosphorous Removal Compatibility M

7/22/2019 Part 2 Physical Chemical Phosphorous Removal Compatibility M

1/50

2P C P


2/50

C

() /( )

P B, FL 2003 20 0.1

L, MI 2004 4 0.07

, N 2005 126 0.12 (0.02)

D , OH 2005 4 0.8I, N 2006 13 0.2

, MA 2010 15 0.2 (0.05)

L, MA 2010 28 0.2 (0.05)

J, NH 2010 4 0.1

, MA 2011 38 0.1 (0.05)


3/50

C A C P

(CP)

Effluent

C

(Influent) A B

O D

A

B P

P

P

Return Activated SludgeRAS Pump Station

0.3 1 L

0.3 /L,


4/50

P

> 0.3 /: BP / C

0.2 0.5 /: F

0.1 0.3 /:

< 0.1 /C/ H C/M M


5/50

C P

A: A2(O4)3*14H2O

F C: FC3

1 /L PO4P

.

5.2 /L F C

0.5 15

C A(OH)3 F(OH)3

C

F P

M


6/50

C D


7/50

C D: D

10

12

14

16

18

liedperMole

emoved

0

2

4

6

8

0,04 0,05 0,06 0,07 0,08 0,09 0,10 0,11 0,12 0,13

Effluent TP (mg/L)

MolesofFeap

ofOrthoP

1 : 1


8/50

P

1 A 0.4

1 FCL3 0.6


9/50

P

1. C PO43

2. C/

3. A PO43 F(OH)3& A(OH)3


10/50

P


11/50

N PP P /.

< 0.01 0.02 /L

0.05 0.07 /L.

C 0.1 /L


12/50

P P L PC M F /

K H

H C/F

K A

I AD

CMM F

BP

P D

O

12


13/50

P :

>0.5: C0.3 /:

. .

/

< 0.1 /:

A

( D / P < 0.5)

D B M P < 0.5


14/50


15/50

C C

Polymer

Rapid orinline Filtered

Solids

VFDVFDCoagulant

ClarifierEffluent Discfilter

Effluent

C P


16/50

C M F

16


17/50

Outletweir

Access platformelevation

Inlettrough

Bypassweir

Emergency

bypasschannel

C

Filter effluentchannel

Influent

channel

FLOW


18/50

H D: P < 0.1 /

P ( 3.8 /), FC3

< 0.5 /L P

A 515 / FC3 D

, (2008)

.

NOH D

H (7)


19/50

H P

Ferric Dose Influent Effluent % Removal

10 0.174 0.0415 76%

15 0.178 0.0269 85%

Total Phosphorous

19

Ferric Dose Influent Effluent % Removal

10 0.105 0.0141 87%

15 0.108 0.0081 93%

Ortho Phosphorous


20/50

P / I

0.30

0.40

0.50

(/)

0.00

0.10

0.20

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

+3

(/)


21/50

M C

A C P (CIP) H


22/50

CA A C C(AC)

NO OHE FILE HA HI OPION C N P

C K D


23/50

A ( 0.05 0.1 /)


24/50

,

A D F: 1.5 MGD

P F: 3 MGD

ACIFLO AP / BP

E. P L

.

0.20 /L

ACIFLO


25/50

South Lyon, MI Wastewater Treatment Plant

ACTIFLO Tertiary Treatment Performance Data (3 x 1.35 MGD Package Plants)

0.50

0.60

0.70

e

(mg/l)

Influent Total Phosphorus Effluent Total Phosphorus

Avg Inf TP = 0.35 mg/lAvg Eff TP = 0.09 mg/l

Activated Sludge with Bio-P

Single Point Alum = 40-50 mg/l

Polymer dose = 0.2- 0.3 mg/l

UV Disinfection

,

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Aug-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Mar-08 Jun-08 Aug-08 Nov-08

Month / Year

MonthlyAve

ra

TotalPhosphorus


26/50

1979

C / O

P F: 126 MGD

1997 C O N EPA CO & A P:

,

NH3, 30 (2005):

J : 1.2 /

O J: 2.4 /

P , 12 :

2006: 0.12 /

2012: 0.02 /


27/50

J & 2000

BAF P 0.75 / < 0.12 /.

P & :

D (P) ()

H (F)

D D

,

ACIFLO (K I.ACIFLO P :

I. P: 0.38 1.06 /L

E. P: 0.04 0.12 /L

C: 2030 /L (F) P: 0.4 0.6 /L


28/50

Syracuse, NY Wastewater Treatment Plant

ACTIFLO Tertiary Treatment Performance (4 x 31 MGD Trains)

0.80

0.90

1.00

1.10

e

mg/l)

Influent Total Phosphorus Effluent Total Phosphorus

Avg Inf TP = 0.45 mg/lAvg Eff TP = 0.10 mg/l

Avg FeCl3 Dose = 28 mg/l

Avg Polymer Dose = 0.6 mg/l

Fixed Film (BAF) Bilogical Treatment Upstream

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

Apr-06 Aug-06 Jan-07 Jun-07 Nov-07 Apr-08 Sep-08 Feb-09

Month / Year

MonthlyAverag

T

otalPhosphoru

s( .


29/50

A F: 6 MLD

D . : 8 MLD

D . : 16 MLD :

P I P: 5 /

, A

P: 2 /

P . P: 0.65 / ( )

C : 0.75 / P


30/50

4 3 :

B P (B )

CM (C C)

AD (D)

ACIFLO

C E

, A

:

1: O

2: O &

3: ( P & .)


31/50

P :

I P: 0.83 1.76 /

ACIFLO P 0.04 / ( 97% )

CM P 0.02 /L

C :

ACIFLO

, A

CM

H :

ADAF ACIFLO . BP & CM .

A , , .


32/50

3CO O


33/50

Wet

Polymer

Rapid Filtered

Solids

VFDVFDCoagulant

P/CO/O D

Flow DiscfilterCoagulation

inlineMixer FlocculationEffluent

90% 50 70% BOD


34/50

(PI + )

P/CO/O / C

(O) P


35/50

(O) P M,

. 40

&

40

50

/

80

100

0

10

20

30

0 200 400 600 800 1000

I /

O

0

20

40

60

(O) P


36/50

(O) P M,

SSO treatment 40- 60 micron Inlet 150-600 mg SS/l (4-10 mg P/l)

coag. + flocc. polymer only no chemicals

SS-reduction, % 85 - 95 80 - 90 45 - 60

BOD-reduction%

Total-P reduction, %

Coagulant (Fe), mg/l

- coagulation time

Flocculant (polymer), ppm

- flocculation time

-

-

-

-

-

-

2-4

2-4 min

10

2-4

4 min

2-4 min

65 - 75 - -

approx 60 - -


37/50

N O O

E F

ACIFLO O

AC AC

M

F P

M


38/50

Plant Location Start-

up

Total Capacity

MGD

No. of

Trains

Application

1 St. Bernard, LA 2001 10 1 Primary and SSO

2 E. Bremerton, WA 2001 10 1 CSO

3 Lawrence, KS 2003 40 2 SSO4 Ft. Smith, AR 2004 31 1 SSO

5 Port Clinton, OH 2004 25 2 CSO

6 Fort Worth, TX 2005 80 2 SSO

ACIFLO CO/O F

*Under construction

** Under contract

,

8 Port Orchard, WA 2006 6.7 1 CSO9 Cincinnati SSO 700, OH 2006 15 1 SSO

10 *Cincinnati Sycamore Creek,

OH

2007 32 2 SSO

11 *Heart of the Valley MSD,

Kaukauna, WI

2007 60 2 SSO

12 **Tacoma, WA 2007 80 2 CSO

13 **Salem, OR 2007 50 2 SSO

14 *Nashua, NH 2008 60 2 CSO


39/50

D B C O D

P/

E / (.. ACIFLO)

EPA (NACA/NDC)


40/50

E

P (BOD, BOD, )


41/50

BAC

Activated Sludge SystemInfluent

Effluent

Return Activated Slud e

Solids

Contact TankACTIFLO

Influent Effluent


42/50

BACIFLO D Solids Contact Tank

Hydraulic Retention Time 20-30 min. 20

MLSS Concentration 800-1000 mg/L 800

Dissolved Oxygen Level 2 4 mg/L 2

High Rate Clarifier

Hydraulic Retention Time 10-15 min. 1/1/3 min ( C/I/M)

Overflow Rate 30-60 m/ft2 45

Microsand Recirculation Rate 15% 15

Sludge Production 12% 12

Estimated Performance

Effluent TSS


43/50

HeadworksScreeningGrit

PrimaryClarifier

AerationBasins SecondaryClarifier Disinfection Effluent To

Outfall

Sludge

ACTIFLOBallasted Clarification

Flow to ActivatedSludge

Flow to

RAS

PlantInfluent

P

Maturation Settling

BiologicalSolids Contact

Tank

Solids Contact

C

I

Coagulant Polymer


44/50

F , AF P

P 1

P 2


45/50

F , A

F

P P 1

P 2

F A O F 1 31 MGD


46/50

B % %

/ / / /6/10/2004 /A /A /A 912 17 98

6/19/2004 65 11 83 255 18 93

F. , A O F 1 31 MGDF O D

6/22/2004 81 17 79 190 15 97

:

8 19

2 4 . : 30 / B, 30 / A

45 / B, 45 /


47/50

P 1: N 15, 2004 J 21, 2005Test Conditions

MLSS: 100, 200, 300, 400, and 800 mg/LContact Basin HRT: 20 and 30 min.

Flow Rate: 200 gpm

Retention Times: Coagulation: 1.5 minInjection: 1.4 minMaturation: 4.2 min

Rise Rate: 30 gpm/sf

Coagulant (Ferric Sulfate): Wet Weather: 70 90 mg/LDry Weather: 100 135 mg/L

Polymer: 2.0 mg/L


48/50

1

MLSSConc.

ContactTank HRT

Turbidity% Removal

TSS% Removal

BOD% Removal

SBOD %Removal

SCOD %Removal

800 mg/L 30 min 99% 80-95% 70-90% 55-85% 60-85%

800 mg/L 20 min 99% 80-95% 65-85% 50-90% 60-75%

400 mg/L 20 min 99% 40-60% 30-50% 35-60% 75-95%

300 mg/L 30 min 99% 90-95% 50-70% 10-60% 50-65%

200 mg/L 30 min 99% 85-95% 60-80% 45-75% 50-80%

100 mg/L 30 min 98% 70-95% 40-75% 25-50% 40-80%


49/50

P 2: N 15, 2004 J 21, 2005Test Conditions

MLSS: 250, 400, 600, 800, 1000, and 1200 mg/LContact Basin HRT: 3.9 21.7 min.

Rise Rate: 30, 40, 45, and 50 gpm/sf

Coagulant (Ferric Sulfate): 175 200 mg/L

Polymer: 2.0 - 4.0 mg/L

2


50/50

2

Primary

Effluent

Ballasted

Floculation

Effluent

Primary

Effluent

Ballasted

Floculation

Effluent

Primary

Effluent

Ballasted

Floculation

Effluent

30 800 59.4 9.9 83.8 20.1 6.7 66.4 64.6 6.2 89.4

Contact

Time

(min)

MLSS

(mg/l)

Percent

Removal

Total BOD(mg/l) Soluble BOD(mg/l)

Percent

Removal

TSS(mg/l)

Percent

Removal

20 800 61.7 16.4 73.1 31.2 11.3 62.9 62.7 7.2 87.5

20 400 114.6 56.7 50.9 81.0 48.0 40.9 60.4 6.6 88.430 200 46.7 15.3 70.5 26.4 15.6 52.5 52.3 5.2 89.2

30 300 76.1 29.4 59.8 41.6 25.3 34.3 80.0 5.2 93.3

Documents

Part 2 Physical Chemical Phosphorous Removal Compatibility M