Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PAPER DE LA BARRERA HEMATOENCEFÀLICA EN LES MALALTIESHEMATOENCEFÀLICA EN LES MALALTIES
NEURODEGENERATIVESJ d l V ll i M iàJaume del Valle i Macià
Grup de Barrera HematoencefàlicaDepartament de FisiologiaFacultat de Farmàcia, UB
0‐ Introduction
0a‐ The blood‐brain barrier
•The BBB
•Components
•Role
0‐ Introduction
0b‐ BBB and neurodegenerative diseases
Vascular origin
1‐ Circulating neurotoxins
1‐ Proinflammatory signals from the
vascular cellsvascular cells
1‐ Reduced capillary blood flow
2‐ Activation of microglia, endothelium
and astrocytes by neurons
3‐ Activated endothelium, microglia, and
astrocytes aggravate the injuryastrocytes aggravate the injury
0‐ Introduction
0c‐ BBB and neurodegenerative diseases
Neuronal origin
1‐ Activation of microglia, endothelium
and astrocytes by neurons
2‐ Activated endothelium, microglia, and
astrocytes signal back to neurons
3‐ Circulating neurotoxins
3‐ Proinflammatory signals from the
vascular cells
3‐ Reduced capillary blood flow3 Reduced capillary blood flow
BBB group’s projects
Alzheimer’sDisease
Huntington’sDisease
BBB substancedeliverydelivery
BBB
Senescence Cell Death
BLOOD‐BRAIN BARRIER ALTERATIONS AND BRAIN AMYLOID PATHOLOGYAND BRAIN AMYLOID PATHOLOGY
IN SAMP8 MICE
Summary
1‐ Introduction: The SAMP8 mice
2‐ Objectives
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, article 1
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice article 3
4‐Method for determining BBB integrity, article 2
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice, article 3
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
7‐ Cerebral amyloid angiopathy, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8, article 5
1‐ The SAMP8 mice
1a‐ The SAMP8 mice
Accelerated senescence+ activity loss+ hair loss & lack of glossiness+ periophthalmic lesions+ periophthalmic lesions+ increased lordokyphosis+ early death
Most ‘‘age‐dependent’’ geriatric disorders in humans, described as ‘‘a direct consequence of physiologic senescence’’ are included in the pathobiological phenotypes in the SAMP model: ‐Osteoporosis‐OsteoarthritisOsteoarthritis‐Cataracts‐Hearing impairment‐Hyperinflation of the lungs
1‐ The SAMP8 mice
1b‐ Characteristics and neuropathology of the SAMP8 mice
Behavioral changes‐Learning and memory deficits‐Reduced anxiety‐like behavior‐Alterations in circadian rhythms
Neuropathological and neurochemical changes‐Reduction of dendritic spines in the hippocampusp pp p‐Astrogliosis‐Increase of β‐amyloid protein‐Cerebellar degeneration‐Microglial cell proliferationg p‐Spongyform degeneration‐Local accumulation of excitatory amino acids ‐Increased oxidative stress‐Phosphorylation of tau and Cdk5 expression
Neurovascular hypothesis
p y p‐Mitochondrial dysfunction‐Blood‐brain barrier alterations (BBB)‐…
Alzheimer’sAlzheimer sdisease
Auguste D.
1‐ The SAMP8 mice
1c‐ Neurovascular hypothesis in SAMP8
‐Increase of β‐amyloid protein
Very few, unclear and Takemura et al., 1993
Fukunari et al 1994
‐BBB alterations
contradictory dataFukunari et al., 1994
Morley et al., 2000
Contradictory data
Takemura et al., 1993
Banks et al 2000
Moinuddin et al., 2000
Contradictory dataBanks et al., 2000
Ueno et al., 1993
Hosokawa i Ueno, 1999
Summary
1‐ Introduction: the SAMP8 mice
2‐ Objectives
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, article 1
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice article 3
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity, article 2
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice, article 3
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
7‐ Cerebral amyloid angiopathy, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8, article 5
2‐ Objectives
2‐Main objectives
1. To determine the existence and temporal progression of any changes in thepermeability of the BBB in the hippocampus and the cerebral cortex of SAMP8 mice.
2. To characterize the Aβ presence and its temporal progression in the hippocampus andb i t f SAMP8 ibrain cortex of SAMP8 mice.
3 To study the possible spatial and temporal relationship between an increase in Aβ and3. To study the possible spatial and temporal relationship between an increase in Aβ andthe BBB disruption in SAMP8 mice.
Summary
1‐ Introduction: the SAMP8 mice
2‐ Objectives
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, article 1
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice article 3
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity, article 2
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice, article 3
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
7‐ Cerebral amyloid angiopathy, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8, article 5
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, study 1.
Animals Age ExperimentAnimals Age Experiment
SAMP8 3, 7 and 12
Analysis of cerebral IgG extravasationmonths
Analysis of cerebral IgG extravasation
SAMR1
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, study 1.
PECAMIgG
Pelegrí et al., 2007. Mech. Ag. Dev. 128, 522‐8
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, study 1.
Pelegrí et al., 2007. Mech. Ag. Dev. 128, 522‐8
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, study 1.
*
Pelegrí et al., 2007. Mech. Ag. Dev. 128, 522‐8
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, study 1.
3‐Conclusions
•Neither SAMP8 nor SAMR1 mice aged 3 and 7 months showed alterations in thepermeability of BBB to IgG.
•No differences can be seen between strains in the vessel diameter.
•12‐month‐old SAMP8 mice show significantly higher levels of IgG extravasation in thehippocampus than SAMR1 animals.
Pelegrí et al., 2007. Mech. Ag. Dev. 128, 522‐8
Summary
1‐ Introduction: the SAMP8 mice
2‐ Objectives
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, article 1
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice article 3
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity, article 2
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice, article 3
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
7‐ Cerebral amyloid angiopathy, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8, article 5
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity
Group1Anesthesia Cryolesion PBS Perfusion Cocktail Perfusion Brain extraction
p
PerfusionCryolesion
1 Anesthesia
Cocktail
1 EB 1%1. Anesthesia
2. Right frontoparietal
cranial exposure
3. Lesion with a 5mm dry
1. EB 1%
2. Hoechst 0,01%.
3. P‐Formaldehid 4%
4. PBS 50 ml
ice (‐78ºC) pellet.
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity
EB Hoechst
Scale Bar = 750µm
del Valle et al., 2009. J. Neurosci. Meth. 174, 42‐9
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity
Nucleus Peripheral ring Peripheral ring
Lesion
Lesion
Scale bar= 150µm
del Valle et al., 2009. J. Neurosci. Meth. 174, 42‐9
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity
PECAM EB
GFAP
EB
CD11b
NeuN
EBCD11b EB
Scale bar = 50µm
del Valle et al., 2009. J. Neurosci. Meth. 174, 42‐9
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity
4‐Conclusions
•Intracardiac cocktail administration allows BBB disruption localization by EB and Hoechst
fluorescence visualization.
• Cocktail perfusion method also allows immunohystochemical studies to characterize
different processes in the BBB disruption.
del Valle et al., 2009. J. Neurosci. Meth. 174, 42‐9
Summary
1‐ Introduction: the SAMP8 mice
2‐ Objectives
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, article 1
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice article 3
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity, article 2
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice, article 3
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
7‐ Cerebral amyloid angiopathy, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8, article 5
5‐ Time‐course of BBB disruption in SAMP8 mice
Animals Age ExperimentAnimals Age Experiment
SAMP8
3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months
Analysis of cerebral cocktailextravasation
SAMR1
ICR‐CD1
5‐ Time‐course of BBB disruption in SAMP8 mice
**
* **
*
**
*
While in ICR‐CD1 EB extravasation values remain stable, in both SAMP8 and SAMR1 theyincrease in CA1While in ICR‐CD1 EB extravasation values remain stable, in both SAMP8 and SAMR1 theyincrease in CA1 and hippocampal fissure.While in ICR‐CD1 EB extravasation values remain stable, in both SAMP8 and SAMR1 theyincrease in CA1, hippocampal fissure and cortex.
Both SAMP8 and SAMR1 mice show higher extravasation values in CA1 and hippocampalfissure than ICR‐CD1
del Valle et al., 2009. Int. J. Devl. Neuroscience. 27, 47‐52
5‐ Time‐course of BBB disruption in SAMP8 mice
5‐Conclusions
•While BBB integrity remains stable throughout the life of ICR‐CD1 mice, SAMP8 andSAMR1 show a progressive increase of disruption from 6 to 15 months of age in cortex, CA1SAMR1 show a progressive increase of disruption from 6 to 15 months of age in cortex, CA1and hippocampal fissure.
•Results obtained at 3 months of age are unexpected, as all strains show higher EBextravasation values than those obtained at 6 months of age.
del Valle et al., 2009. Int. J. Devl. Neuroscience. 27, 47‐52
Summary
1‐ Introduction: the SAMP8 mice
2‐ Objectives
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, article 1
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice article 3
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity, article 2
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice, article 3
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
7‐ Cerebral amyloid angiopathy, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8, article 5
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
Animals Age Experiment
SAMP8SAMP8
3, 6, 9, 12 and 15
hAnalysis of A depositionSAMR1
months
ICR‐CD1
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
Py OrRad
3m 6m 9m 12 m 15m
C
P
R
del Valle et al., 2010. J. Alz. Dis. 27, 47‐52
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
del Valle et al., 2010. J. Alz. Dis. 27, 47‐52
In SAMP8 there is a progressive increase in the number of amyloid
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
‐In SAMP8, there is a progressive increase in the number of amyloid clusters in the hippocampus from 3 months onwards.
‐ In the other two strains, the number of amyloid clusters keep low y pand stable up to 15 months of age, when numbers increase; although they do not reach the levels shown by SAMP8 mice.
‐In SAMP8, there is a progressive increase in the number of β42clusters in the hippocampus from 3 months onwards.
I th th t t i th b f β l t i l d‐ In the other two strains, the number of β42 clusters remain low and stable up to 15 months of age, when numbers increase; although they do not reach the levels shown by SAMP8 mice.
‐ In SAMP8, there is an increase in the hippocampus in the number of β40 clusters compared to the other two strains from 6 months β40 ponwards.
del Valle et al., 2010. J. Alz. Dis. 27, 47‐52
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
SAMP8 i h k d l id d iti f 6 th d d ith
6‐Conclusions
•SAMP8 mice show a marked amyloid deposition from 6 months onwards compared withSAMR1 and ICR‐CD1 control strains.
•SAMP8 mice become a useful tool to study the mechanisms involved in the formation ofAβ deposition in spontaneous Alzheimer’s disease.
del Valle et al., 2010. J. Alz. Dis. 27, 47‐52
Summary
1‐ Introduction: the SAMP8 mice
2‐ Objectives
3‐ BBB status in SAMP8 mice, article 1
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice article 3
4‐ A new method for determining BBB integrity, article 2
5‐ Time‐course of blood–brain barrier disruption in SAMP8 mice, article 3
6‐ Early amyloid accumulation in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice, article 4
7‐ Cerebral amyloid angiopathy, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8, article 5
7‐ CAA, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8
Animals Age Experiment
SAMP8 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Analysis of vessels with CAA, BBB disruption and A40 aggregation
ICR CD1ICR‐CD1
7‐ CAA, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8
Amyloid positive vessels (CAA)
14161820
y p ( )vessels
**
*
*
†
†
468
101214
ICR
SAMP8
†
024
3 6 9 12 months
‐SAMP8 mice exhibit higher levels of CA1 amyloid positive vessels than age‐matched ICR mice. ‐Old mice of 12 months show more amyloid vessels than younger, say 3 months, or d lt f 6 t 9 th i b th t iadult ages from 6 to 9 months in both strains
del Valle et al., pendent
7‐ CAA, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8
IgG positive vessels
35
40
45
g pvessels
†
†*
10
15
20
25
30ICR
SAMP8
†
0
5
10
3 6 9 12 months
‐At 12 months of age, IgG positive vessels appear in a regular pattern in both strains and very few IgG positive vessels are seen in the CA1 subzone of the hippocampus at 3, 6 y g p pp p ,and 9 months of age.‐Old mice of 12 months show more IgG positive vessels than young and adult mice.‐At 12 months of age old SAMP8 mice seem to have a more disrupted BBB with more I G iti l th ld ICR i (P 0 075)IgG positive vessels than old ICR mice (P=0,075).
del Valle et al., pendent
βPECAM
7‐ CAA, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8
β40IgG
PECAMβ40
β40IgG
PECAMβ40
del Valle et al., pendent
7‐ CAA, amyloid deposition and BBB disruption in SAMP8
F 3 th d SAMP8 i t hi h l l f β l id iti l
7‐Conclusions
•From 3 months onwards, SAMP8 mice present higher levels of β40 amyloid positive vesselsthan age‐matched ICR mice.
•Both SAMP8 and ICR strains show an increase of CAA at 12 months of age compared toyoung and adult mice.
•There is no direct association between the location amyloid clusters and:• blood vesselsblood vessels• BBB disrupted vessels• Amyloid positive vessels
•All the vessels with amyloid deposition show a disruption in the BBB with IgG deposition.In addition, several capillaries with IgG deposition can be found with no amyloidaccumulation within their walls.
BLOOD‐BRAIN BARRIER ALTERATIONS AND BRAIN AMYLOID PATHOLOGYAND BRAIN AMYLOID PATHOLOGY
IN SAMP8 MICE
Jaume del Valle i Macià
Grup de Barrera HematoencefàlicaDepartament de FisiologiaFacultat de Farmàcia, UB