20
PAMS XXVIII SYNDICATE 3 PRESENTATION THEME: REGIONAL COOPERATION IN CHANGING SECURITY ENVIRONMENT 10 SEP 04

PAMS XXVIII SYNDICATE 3 PRESENTATION THEME: REGIONAL COOPERATION IN CHANGING SECURITY ENVIRONMENT 10 SEP 04

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

PAMS XXVIII SYNDICATE 3 PRESENTATION

THEME: REGIONAL COOPERATION IN CHANGING SECURITY ENVIRONMENT

10 SEP 04

SYNDICATE 3 MEMBERS

• SYNDICATE LEADERBRIG KELLY JUSTIN AUSTRALIA

• ASST LEADERBRIG GEN SOOROOJEBALLY R MAURITIUS

• DELEGATESLT COL SIKDER M S A BANGLADESHMAJ GEN TENNAKOON S D SRI LANKACOLONEL LI JI CHINA (PRC)COLONEL LAHIRI SK INDIALT COL IWANA SEIICHI JAPANCOL ONODERA YASUSHI JAPAN BRIG GEN GOH AH BAH MALAYSIA

• DELEGATES BRIG SOUTHWELL PAUL NEW ZEALANDCOL KATEBUROME PISIT THAILANDCOMMANDER FONOKALAFI TONI TONGACOL SHANAHAN DAVID UNITED STATES

• OBSERVERSCOL SUKUMA SUPOT THAILANDCOL PIPITHKUL NIRAN THAILANDMAJOR LEE S J (STEVE) UNITED STATES

• RECORDERS LT COL A HALIM JALAL MALAYSIA MAJOR SINGH NAGENDRA INDIA

OVERVIEW

• SECURITY ENVIRONMENT IN COMING DECADE

• PRINCIPLE OF COOPERATION.PRINCIPLE OF COOPERATION.

• COOPERATIVE RESPONSE OPTIONS.COOPERATIVE RESPONSE OPTIONS.

• PREPARING ARMIES FOR PREPARING ARMIES FOR COOPERATION.COOPERATION.

SECURITY ENVIRONMENT IN COMING DECADE

SECURITY ENVIRONMENT IN COMING DECADE

• NATIONAL SECURITY: FUNCTION OF INTERWOVEN FACTORS.

• THREATS: NON-TRADITIONAL AND TRANS-NATIONAL.• GREATER ROLE OF NON-STATE ACTORS .• TRADITIONAL STATE-TO-STATE CONFLICTS GIVING

WAY TO SUB-NATIONAL CONFLICTS.• GLOBALIZATION HAS FACILITATED THE SURFACING OF

TRANSNATIONAL ADVERSARIAL ELEMENTS: – AVAILABILITY OF MEANS TO REACH TARGET AREA

WITH EXPLOSIVES W/O DETECTION.– USE OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA TO MANIPULATE

PUBLIC OPINION. – FACILITY OF CAUSING MASS CASUALTIES OR LARGE

SCALE DESTRUCTION.

KEY AREAS OF CONFLICT

• SUB-NATIONAL CONFLICTS PRINCIPALLY LINKED TO STATE FAILURES

• HUMANITARIAN CONCERNS HAVE BECOME PART OF INTERNATIONAL SECURITY POLICIES

• TRANS-NATIONAL CHALLENGES- TERRORISM, PROLIFERATION OF WMD, ORGANIZED CRIME HAVE BECOME KEY THREATS.

• DISPROPORTIONATE EFFECT.

• STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE.

• UNDERMINING OF WILL.

CHARACTERISTICS OF ASYMMETRIC WARFARE

EMPLOYING COOPERATION TO ADDRESS COMMON SECURITY

CHALLENGES

• INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM. • TRANS NATIONAL CRIMES LIKE FISHERY PROTECTION.• SECURITY OF SEA LANES OF COMMUNICATION.• TRAFFICKING OF DRUGS. • MONEY LAUNDERING.• DISEASE.• DEMOGRAPHIC DRIFT. • THREATS TO GROWING WORLD ECONOMY.• DESTRUCTION OF THE SUBSISTENCE ECONOMY.• CYBER CRIMES. • WMD PROLIFERATION.• ILLEGAL ARMS SMUGGLING.• ETHNIC/RELIGIOUS CONFLICTS.• ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION.

FUTURE SECURITY CHALLENGES

PRINCIPLES OF COOPERATION

• CLEAR IDENTIFICATION OF COMMON AIM/OBJECTIVE/MISSION AND TERMS OF REFERENCES.

• ACCEPT TEMPORARY DILUTION OF CONTROL FOR LONG TERM BENEFITS.

• TRANSPARENCY.

• INTERDEPENDENCE AND INTERVULNERABILITY.

• MUTUAL RESPECT FOR EACH OTHER.

• INTEROPERABILITY/COMPLEMENTARITY:

– SHARED INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENCE.

– SHARED PLANNING.

– COMMON DOCTRINES.

COOPERATIVE RESPONSE OPTIONS FOR FUTURE SECURITY CHALLENGES

COOPERATIVE RESPONSE OPTIONS FOR FUTURE

SECURITY CHALLENGES

• INFORMATION EXCHANGE MECHANISM.

• CONTINGENCY PLANS/KEY TARGET

PROTECTION.

• SEMINARS AND TRAINING COURSES.

• COMBINED MULTILATERAL AND INTER-

AGENCY EXERCISES.

PRE-EMERGENCY ACTIONS

COOPERATIVE RESPONSE OPTIONS FOR FUTURE

SECURITY CHALLENGES

• REGIONAL COOPERATIVE RESPONSE.

• DEVELOP SPECIFIC SOLUTIONS TO UNIQUE

REGIONAL ISSUES.

• INVOLVEMENT OF UN IN LEGITIMISING AND

G-8 IN SUPPORTING REGIONAL INITIATIVES.

OPERATIONAL RESPONSE

HOW DO WE PREPARE OUR ARMIES?

HOW DO WE PREPARE OUR ARMIES?

ABILITIES REQUIRED BY THE MODERN ARMIES

• CULTURAL CHALLENGES IN PICTURING WHAT A “GOOD” ARMY LOOKS LIKE. A CULTURAL SHIFT TO SUPPORT CREATION OF JOINT INTERAGENCY COMBINED TASK FORCES – PERHAPS WITH OTHER AGENCIES HAVING PRIMACY.

• EDUCATE THE TROOPS RATHER THAN JUST TRAIN THEM. (HOW TO THINK – NOT WHAT TO THINK)

• IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNICATION SKILLS AND MEDIA INTERACTION OF JUNIOR LEADERS - NEED TO BE “ON-MESSAGE”.

• REDESIGN FORCE STRUCTURE TO INCREASE MODULARITY IN ORDER TO ENABLE CREATION OF SCALABLE, TASK-CONFIGURED, INTER-AGENCY COMBINED ARMS TEAMS.

• LIC IS NO LONGER ‘LOW-INTENSITY’ – WE MUST SEEK EXCELLENCE IN CLOSE COMBAT. THIS APPLIES TO ALL ARMS AND SERVICES.

• THE DEVELOPMENT OF JUNIOR LEADERS L/CPL, CPL, LT AND CAPT IS CRITICAL AND THE HIGHEST PAY-OFF. THIS MAY BEST BE DONE BY MENTORING/ DEVELOPMENT THROUGHOUT THE CHAIN OF COMMAND.

• ADAPTIVE DIVERSE THREATS REQUIRE ADAPTIVE DOCTRINE THAT TAKES OPERATIONAL LESSONS AND INCULCATES THEM INTO THE INSTITUTION IN REAL TIME.

• A LEARNING ORGANIZATION REQUIRES LIVING DOCTRINE. DOCTRINAL EDIFICES NEED TO BE REDUCED.

• WE NEED TO LEARN FROM OTHER COUNTRIES’ EXPERIENCE AS WELL AS FROM OUR OWN. PERHAPS A MECHANISM FOR THE RAPID DISTRIBUTION OF INSIGHTS AND LESSONS.

• A FEW UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED AND PRACTICED PRINCIPLES CAN BE EFFECTIVE IN ACCULTURATING YOUNG MEN TO DANGEROUS AND COMPLEX CIRCUMSTANCES.

• NEED TO INSTILL EMPATHY FOR TARGET POPULATION IN OUR SOLDIERS AND LEADERS.

DOCTRINE AND INDIVIDUAL PREPARATION

QUESTIONS?