Upload
giordano-sosa
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Paging Indicator in Fading Environment 01264288
1/5
The 14* IEEE 2003 International Symposium on Persona1,lndoor and Mobile Radio Communication Proceedings
Performance of WCDMA Downlink Access and Paging Indicators in
Multipath Rayleigh Fading Channels
V i er i V angh i and S and i p S a r ka r
QUALCOMM Incorporated,
5775 Morehouse Drive, San Diego, CA
92 12 1
E-mai
I: {
vvanghi,ssarkar] 6ilqualcomm..com
Abstract - n WCDM.4 [ I ] , downlink channel indicators are
iised in (I varieiy ojprocedirr-es related to access
arid
paging. 4
binar,v
indicator is sent
on
the Paging Indicator Channel PICH)
when n
iiiobile
station (MS)
is
paged.
A
ternary indicator is sent on
the .Access
Indicator Channel AICH) when
the
MS attempts to access
(he i i e n v o i k While iinderlyirig inotivations for iising paging and
nccess indicators nre ddferent, t1ie.v both share same key
perjorniuiice nspects: detection
reliabilit?
at the cel l edge and
dowiilit ik capacity consiiinption. This paper details a finmework for
PICI-I ai ic l ICH p e
forniance
antilysis.
Results
are derived that are
of
pructicul interesl to the network operrrtor f o r downlink transinit
power b
id,yet ng.
1 Introduction
I n
UMTS radio access networks (UTRAN), the use of
indicator channels is key to the enhanced performance of the
paging and access procedures [ ] - in particular, for mobile
stations, stand-by time and uplink random access latency.
MS
stand-by time increases when battery consumption in idle
state is reduced. When idle, the M S must perform periodic
supervision procedures that require powering on its circuitry,
e.g., cell reselection, monitoring control channels to obtain
updated overhead information, and monitoring paging channel
to receive a call. When performing these periodic tasks, the
M S is awake and its circuitry is partly enabled.
In
between
such periods, the
M S
goes asleep and most of its circuitry is
disabled. When awake, the current drawn is significantly
larger (100 times or larger) than when asleep, so that it is
desirable to keep the awake period to
a
minimum. One
method is the use of paging indicators. The paging indicators
are binary and are sent periodically once per slot cycle on the
paging indicator channel
(PICH).
If set to
ON,
the MS is to
demodulate the next paging channel slot. Otherwise, the MS
can immediately go to sleep, dramatically reducing its battery
consumption [2].
Indicators are also used to support access procedures. When
attempting to access the radio network, the MS sends probes
on the uplink. Within each probe interval, the M S waits for
an
acknowledgment from the serving cell. If the acknowledgment
is received within a predetermined timeout period, the
M S
proceeds with sending the Layer
3
message on the random
access channel, otherwise it transmits another probe at higher
power. If the probe and the acknowledgment were based on
Layer
3
signaling, the access latency may be large
as a
result
of message processing, queuing, and transmission times.
Obviously. the access time can be reduced if the probe
duration and the base station
(BS)
turnaround time
in
sending
the acknowledgment are reduced. The solution adopted by
UTRAN is the use of access channel indicators that are sent on
the access indicator channel (AICH) by the
BS
in response to
a probe detected on the uplink. The indicators are very short in
duration and are sent within a few milliseconds of the receipt
of the probe, resulting in very fast uplink access protocol.
The caveat is that these channels must be transmitted at
a
rather high power, as the BS does not know the MS location
and no mechanism for open loop power control exists. The
transinit power must be set to
a
level high enough to guarantee
re1 iable detection at the cell edg e, thereb y consuming
downlink capacity.
The scope of this paper is to estimate the detection
performance of the paging and ac cess indicators in fading
channels and to assess the transmit power needed for these
channels. The paper is organized
as
follows. In Section 2 the
structure o f the PICH and the A ICH are outlined.
In
Section
3,
the received signal to noise ratio required to achieve target
probabilities of false alarm and detection are computed.
Section 4 provides a transmit power budget for the PICH and
AICH. Conclusions are drawn
in
Section 5.
2 The
Indicator Channels
This section describes the two indicator channels of our
interest used on the WCDMA downlink. For more details, the
reader is referred to
[ I ]
Note that SF means Spreading Factor,
i.e. the number of chips per bit.
2.1
The PICH
is
a fixed rate
(SF
= 256) physical channel used to
carry paging indicators (PI). Figure illustrates the structure
of the PICH. One IO-ms PlCH frame consists of
300
bits (bo,
b , , ... b299).Of these, 288 bits
bo,
b, ,
...
bZ8,) are used
to
carry paging indicators, and 12 bits are not transmitted.
The Paging Indicator Channel (PICH)
12 bi t s
( i iansmissiun
orn
88
b i ts fo r
paging
ind ica t ion
4
- -
b
bo bi h a 7 b i a a
b o
m
One
r a d io f r a m e ( I O ms)
Figure 1: Structure
of
PlCH
In each PlCH frame, N paging indicators {Po,
...,
PNp- , )are
transmitted, where Np=1 8,
36,
72, or 144. T he
PI
to be used by
a certain M S, is associated to the paging indicator P,
[ I ] .
If a
0-7803-7822-9/03/ 17.00
003
IEEE.
331 *
http://6ilqualcomm..com/http://6ilqualcomm..com/8/9/2019 Paging Indicator in Fading Environment 01264288
2/5
8/9/2019 Paging Indicator in Fading Environment 01264288
3/5
The 1
4m
EEE 2003 International Symposium on Persona1 lndoor and Mobile Radio Communication Proceedings
freedom and non-equal variances. When the paths energies are
identical,
The received indicator's
SNR
expressed as in Eq.(9) is a
central Chi-square random variable with 2L degrees of
freedom, whose distribution is known [4] and is
mathematically tractable.
r
(12)
The detector attempts to achieve a given target
PFA
by
decreasing the parameter 5 as the SNR increases, and vice-
versa. Note that the range of
5
is selected such
that qI, 5 = ) =
f/-
{ = -1) = 0.5 for any given S NR.
PICH
4
wo-palhs. Pf
= 10%
I --.-
wo-paths. Pf 20
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - -
...
...
.. ,.,
i __ __
~
I
.. *..
,
F i gur e
3:
P e r f o r m a n c e
of
the
PICH
in
Fading Channels
Figure
3
illustrates the performance of the PICH
corresponding to PFA equal to 10% or
20%. In
order to,
achieve a reasonably low PM ay,
I%,
the required received
indicator's SNR is between 5.5 to
I O
dB, for the single path
and two-path channels, respectively.
3.2
The Acquisition Indicator Channel
Hereafter, w e use similar mode l as that used for the PICH, but
we account for the AICH temary decision as the AICH is
either gated-off or is BPSK modulated. The AICH filter is
matched to the signature used in the probe's preamble.
Assuming a noiseless phase reference for coherent
demodulation, the matched filter sampled outputs after de-
spreading, de-scrambling, and maxim um ratio comb ining give
rise to the same decision variable as in Eq.(l), where the
indicator
b
can now take one of three values,
+ I , -1,
or
0,
corresponding to a positive acknowledgment, negative
acknowledgment, or no transmission respectively. The
detector must select on e of three hypotheses:
HI
: r = Ebcai v
L
k=l
H , :
r = v 13)
H - ,
: r = - E ~ Z ~ :
V
A
biased MAP detector can be used that compares the
matched filter output with two thresho lds given by
z ( , , E b c a i 0
I ,,
1
z A
-( ,E, ,cai 0I
/
1
Like the PICH, the AICH detection threshold is proportional
to the estimated received
SNR,
which is obtained from the
estimated received CPICH energy. The detector selects
hypotheses H I
i f r > z,,, Ho i fz , 5 r
IT
r H.1 i f r
z/l16
= 01=
e 5, )
(15)
p+I/-I C A ,
rb)
= Pr[r >
b
= I] = e[&%('
{ h ) ) (16)
Th e subscript x / y stands for hypotheses x being selected when
y is the correct one. The e rror events 0/+1 and
- I / + ]
are nearly
equivalent in terms of cost (in both cases the
M S
misses a
333
8/9/2019 Paging Indicator in Fading Environment 01264288
4/5
The
14th
EEE
2003
International Symposium on Persona1,lndoor and Mobile Radio Communication Proceedings
valid oppoi-tunity to transmit the Layer 3 message) and
therefore the PM s defined as
PF,.\ can be defined a s the event +1/ 0on ly, as the cost
associated with even t -1/O is relatively small, i.e.,
f
P+O t>Y,) (22)
Com paring Eq.(2 1)-(22) with (5)-(6), the AICH detection
performance is
6
dB worse than that of the PICH. That can
also be seen by letting(,
= 4,
=
0.5
and
6 =
0,
in
which case,
er r ( 0.5.y,,)=p, 5,)
= 0 . 5 , Y , ) = Q ( m ) or the AICH,
and
e),( =
0,y,
= f 4 = 0, y , , ) =
e(&) for the PICH.
Like the PICH, the A ICH detector attempts to achieve a given
PI:-\ by varying
4,
as the SN R varies.
AICH
10 15 20
'
SNR [ d B ]
Figure
4:
Performance of the AICH
in
Fading Channels
Performance of the AICH
i s
depicted
in Figure
4 for PFA
equal to
5%
or 10%. I n order to achieve PMof 5 and PFA
=
WO,he received indicator's SNR must be
9.5
to 12 dB for the
single path and two-path channels, respectively.
4
Transmit
Power
Budg et at BS
The indicator channels need to be transmitted at a constant
power level such that they can be reliably demodulated at the
cell edge. Let i e power spectral density received at the
M S
from the cell where the M S is located. The interference power
spectral density due other cells' interference is denoted by
1
.
The ratio
i,,,
I,, is referred to as cell geometry
[ 5 ] .
The
indicator channel (either PICH or AIC H) received SN R, x s
related to the CPICH chip transmit en ergy, E, ; he total cell's
transmit power spectral density,
I,,,
; he cell geometry and the
processing gain, G,, as
in
Y*
= PG,,
l o r
(23)
where pis the indicator channel transmit power relative to the
common pilot power, or indicator channel's offset.
Note
that
the ratio CPlCH E, / l , )?s a measu re of downlin k cell loading.
The ratio is at its minimum, typically -10 dB, for a fully
loaded cell. Solving for the required indicator c hannel's offset,
p = y ,
/ '+I--
G , (24)
,,r ;)
cpl;,H 1
and
CPICH
Combining
Eq.(23)
with
(25)
and solving for
b,
P =
(25)
Eq.(26)
represents the transmit power budget used to
configure the cell. It represents the minimum required
indicator channel's offset to achieve the target SNR with a
confidence level represented by the minimum
received CPICH( E,
/ I , ,
) typically expected at the cell edge.
4.1 The Paging Indicator Channel
The PICH processing gain depends on the number of paging
indicators per fram e, N,,, the paging indicator bit rate,
Rl, =
30
kbps, the spreading chip
rate, R,,
as in
R,
16.18
G =--
I Rh N,'
Using the results from Section 3.1, the required PICH offset
resulting from Eq.(26), is plotted i n Figure 5.
s,
CPlCH
EcIlor
= -10
dB.
Eb/Nt = 5.5
dB
s , CPlCH Ec/lor= -4 d B, Eb/Nt = 5 5 dB
~-
.- . .
- -
. . .
8 -
,
7
-
- 1 0 -
-12
-14
Figure 5: PICH offset vs. CPICH E f l o for N , = 18
334
8/9/2019 Paging Indicator in Fading Environment 01264288
5/5
The I
m
EEE
2003
International Symposium on Persona1,lndoor and Mobile Radio Communication Proceedings
The two-path channel is more benign than the single path
channel. as the diversity gain outweighs the partial
loss
of
orthogonality among downlink code channels. For a
given C131~1- 1 ( ~c/,,), a smaller offset is required for a fully
loaded cell than for a lightly loaded cell. Setting the PlCH
offset to -7 dB allows the BS to obtain same coverage
provided that N,,=
18
andC PiCI-I(L '//,) is no less than
approximately -16 dB. When N,, is varied. the required PICH
offset changes linearly i n dB's.
Results i n Figure
5
show that reliable detection cannot be
guaranteed for very low cell geometry unless a
disproportionate amount of power is allocated to the indicator
channel. The WCDMA standard prescribes that the MS
demodulate the common pilot as weak as -20 dB, but that
would require an indicator's offset equal to -3 d B (more than
5 of total downlink ca pacity). A practical solution is to
'erase' the indicator channel bit whenever the common pilot,
strength falls below a threshold [6]. When the PlCH is erased,
the M S always demodulates the assigned paging channel slot,
thus negating the battery power saving advantages provided
by the PICH. But this i s preferable to missing valid page
messages. The optimum setting of the erasure threshold,
A,,,,,,,,.
can be derived by solving Eq.(26) for the minimum
ci'lcl-l(E~//(,):
'
I ) L
Although the MS is unaware of the cell loading, the error
caused by the approximation on the right hand side of
Eq.(28)
is only a fraction of a dB. Eq.(28) is also of practical use, as
the resulting erasure threshold does not depend on the
multipath profile.
4.2 Acquisition Indicator Channel
Using similar analysis like the PICH, using
Eq.(26)
the results
for the required AICH offset ar e plotted
in Figure 6 .
I 1
m a t h ,
CPICH Ec/lor
= -10 dB.
E b / h
12 dB
I - pat h .
CPICH Ec/lor =
B,
Eb/Nt
= 12 dB
2-paths,
CPICH Ecilor =
-10dB,
Eb/Nt =
9
5
dB
2-paths, CPICH Ec/lor = B. Eb/Nt = 9.5 dB
- - ~ - /- ~ - - - - - .. . l-
- _ ~ _ _
- 2 ,
.
c j
i
- 4
~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _
-6;.
.. I 1 I I
CPICH Ec/lo [ d B]
I n case of weak coininon pilot, the AlCH can also be erased.
When the AlCH is erased, the MS should proceed with
transmission of another preamble unless the preamble is the
last
in
the sequence, in which case the MS proceeds with
AlCH detection. The AlCH erasure threshold can be
determined using Eq.(28) The processing gain for the AlCH
is 36.12 dB as there are 4,096 chips per AICH slot. That IS
exactly 3 dB larger than the processing gain of the PlCH
operated with N,, = 18. The AICH detection performance is 6
d B worse than that of the PICH as the decision is ternary
rather than binary. However, the AICH can tolerate a slightly
larger probability of erro r, as the cost incurred is smaller than
that for the PICH. Then, differences above tend to mutually
cancel and the required A lCH offset is similar to that of the
PICH. Unlike the PICH. however, the AlCH is operated in
DTX mode, and therefore its contribution to downlink
capacity consumption is smaller. A nominal AlCH offset
value could then be -6 dB.
I
5
Conclusions
Typically, the PICH is operated to achieve
PM
=
1
and PI =
10%. This can be obtained when the indicat6r's received SNR
is I O dB for
a
single path, and 5.5 dB f or two' equal strength
paths respectively. Perform ance o f an ideal AICH detecto r,
due to its ternary symbol source, is 6 dB worse than that of the
PICH. Typical performance targets are Pbl =
5%
and PTA=
5 . This can be achieved when the indicator's received
SN R
is 12 dB for a single path, and 9.5 dB for two equal strength
paths respectively.
Based on the above, the operator should budget the cell 's
downlink transmit pow er by setting the offset
of
the PlCH and
the AlCH to be -7 dB and -6 dB relative
to
the common pilot
respectively. This provides adequate performance at or near
the cell edge, provided the received corninon pilot strength IS
no less than -16 dB, corresponding to most of the cell area for
a typical network layout [7]. When the pilot
IS
weaker than
that threshold, the
M S
i s aware that it cannot meet the
reliability requirement and therefore inay disregard, or 'era se',
the indicator. The
M S
can determine the erasure threshold as a
function of known UTRAN configuration parameters.
. ,
References
3GPP G. T.
25.21
1.
Teclinical Speciticatioii
Group
hdio Access
S . Sarkar
and
E.
G .
Tiedemaiiii
Jr.. T o m m o n
Channel
Soft Flandolf.
Network:
Physical cliaiiiiels and mapping
of
transpor t cllaniiels. . I990
iii
cdma2000 ,
IEEE Trans. On
Microwave Theory and
Tech..
vol. 48.
no.
6, pp 938-950, June 2000.
S. Sarkar, B. K . Butler and E. G. Tiedemann Jr . , Phone Standby
Time
iii
cdma2000: Tlie Quick Paging Cliannel
in
Soft handoff'.
IEEE
Trans. On Veh. Tech. ,
pp
1240-1249, vol.
50,110. 5,
September 2001.
J. G. Proakis, Digital Cortirllzn?icat~or?s.
' Ed.,
Mc Graw Hill, 200
I.
S .
Sarkar
and
E.
G .
Tiedemann
Jr.,
Acquisition Scheines
in
Third
Generation Wireless Systems . Journal
o f
Communications
and
Networks, vol.
3,
no. 2, pp 120-13
.
June 2001.
S
Sarkar and
E.
G . Tiedemanp Jr.. The Paging
Channel
i n
cdtna2000 , Proceedings
of
ICON,
pp.
257-264. September I999
W.
C . Y .
Lee. Mobile
Cellulak
~l'elecom milliication s 2nd Ed..
McCraw
Hill, 1995.
Figure 6:
AICH
offset vs.
CPICH
Ec/Io
5