Page 1 C GH FGH gH H kLMN KLMO M R R R R R TU C gH DFGH H ... · e e m S S OK 262 60 46 33 119 63 88 111 187 76 103 159 98 164 176 83 131 131 47 32 143 29% 31% 37% 25% 28% 32% 35%

Page 1Fielding Period: September 14 - 16, 2020INT/WillWeighted To The U.S. General Adult Population - Propensity

16 Sep 2020Table 1Q1A Before the COVID-19 pandemic hit in early March, did you ever attend any in-person trade shows, expos, business

conventions or conferences? Please select all that apply.

Base: All Respondents

Gender Age Male Age Female Age Region

North- Mid-Total Male Female 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 18-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ east South west West

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V)

2049 998 1051 623 343 343 310 430 287 180 190 153 188 336 163 153 157 242 396 815 404 434Unweighted Base2049 989 1060 596 342 334 347 430 298 169 167 165* 190 298 173* 167* 182 240 366 785 419 480Weighted Base

890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 21443% 53% 35% 51% 58% 46% 37% 26% 63% 71% 51% 40% 34% 39% 45% 40% 34% 19% 51% 42% 38% 45%

C GH FGH gH H kLMN KLMO M R R R R R TU

Yes (Net)

631 394 238 199 149 112 91 80 134 95 68 49 47 65 54 44 42 33 137 220 108 16731% 40% 22% 33% 44% 33% 26% 19% 45% 56% 41% 30% 25% 22% 31% 26% 23% 14% 38% 28% 26% 35%

C gH DFGH H H LMN iKLMO lMP R r nR R R TU tU

Yes, and I travelled outside of my city to attend

475 280 195 174 114 75 56 56 106 67 38 33 36 68 47 37 23 20 104 178 85 10823% 28% 18% 29% 33% 22% 16% 13% 36% 40% 23% 20% 19% 23% 27% 22% 13% 8% 28% 23% 20% 23%

C fGH FGH H KLMN KLMo R QR QR qR tU

Yes, and I attended within my city

1159 465 694 293 144 182 220 320 111 49 81 99 125 182 95 100 121 196 178 453 262 26657% 47% 65% 49% 42% 54% 63% 74% 37% 29% 49% 60% 66% 61% 55% 60% 66% 81% 49% 58% 62% 55%

B E DEf DEFG iJ IJ IJK I J NOPQM S S

No

2265 1138 1127 665 408 369 367 456 350 211 188 181 208 315 197 181 186 248 419 851 454 541111% 115% 106% 112% 119% 110% 106% 106% 118% 125% 112% 110% 109% 106% 114% 108% 102% 103% 115% 108% 108% 113%

Sigma

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5%, 10% risk level) - B/C - D/E/F/G/H - I/J/K/L/M - N/O/P/Q/R - I/N - J/O - K/P - L/Q - M/R - S/T/U/VOverlap formulae used. * small base





Parent of ChildHousehold Income Education Employed Children in HH Under 18 Home Ownership Marital Status Race/Ethnicity

Less $50K $75K Black WhiteThan - - HS or Some College Not (Not His- (Not His-

Total $50K $74.9K $99.9K $100K+ less College Grad+ Yes No Yes No Yes No Homeowner Renter Married married Hispanic panic) panic)

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (O) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U)

2049 819 409 275 457 613 615 821 1166 883 773 1276 685 1364 1373 605 995 1054 205 189 1460Unweighted Base2049 633 338 274 718 679 678 692 1169 880 789 1260 677 1372 1427 546 977 1072 315 237 1247Weighted Base

890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 49243% 31% 37% 47% 59% 29% 37% 64% 57% 25% 58% 34% 65% 33% 47% 38% 49% 38% 51% 51% 39%

BC BCD F FG J L N P R U U

Yes (Net)

631 126 79 95 321 121 173 337 484 147 312 319 313 318 497 131 351 280 129 66 35431% 20% 23% 35% 45% 18% 26% 49% 41% 17% 40% 25% 46% 23% 35% 24% 36% 26% 41% 28% 28%

BC BCD F FG J L N P R TU


475 93 70 62 244 110 119 246 363 112 274 201 252 223 361 108 267 208 81 79 25123% 15% 21% 23% 34% 16% 18% 35% 31% 13% 35% 16% 37% 16% 25% 20% 27% 19% 26% 33% 20%

B B BCD FG J L N P R U


1159 437 213 145 292 481 427 251 500 659 328 830 235 924 752 339 497 662 153 117 75657% 69% 63% 53% 41% 71% 63% 36% 43% 75% 42% 66% 35% 67% 53% 62% 51% 62% 49% 49% 61%

DE DE E GH H I K M O Q ST

No

2265 655 362 302 857 713 719 833 1347 918 914 1351 801 1464 1611 578 1114 1150 363 262 1361111% 104% 107% 110% 119% 105% 106% 120% 115% 104% 116% 107% 118% 107% 113% 106% 114% 107% 115% 110% 109%

Sigma

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5%, 10% risk level) - B/C/D/E - F/G/H - I/J - K/L - M/N - O/P - Q/R - S/T/UOverlap formulae used.





# of in-person trade shows,expos, business conventionsor conferences attended in

a typical year

Traveled Out-side Their

City To Att-end in-persontrade shows,expos, busi-ness conven-tions or con-

Total 1-5 6+ ferences

(A) (B) (C) (D)

2049 675 119 639Unweighted Base2049 650 128* 631Weighted Base

890 650 128 63143% 100% 100% 100%

Yes (Net)

631 446 108 63131% 69% 84% 100%

B


475 353 77 21623% 54% 60% 34%


1159 - - -57% - - -

No

2265 799 185 847111% 123% 145% 134%

Sigma

____________________________________________________________Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5%, 10% risk level) - B/COverlap formulae used. * small base


16 Sep 2020Table 4Q1 Before the COVID-19 pandemic hit in early March, approximately how many in-person trade shows, expos, business

conventions or conferences did you attend in a typical year? If less than one a year, please enter ’0’.

Base: Ever Attended In-Person Trade Show/Expo/Conference/Convention Prior To Pandemic




924 551 373 319 210 162 111 122 184 137 102 58 70 135 73 60 53 52 215 357 159 193Unweighted Base890 524 366 303 198 153* 127* 110* 187* 120* 86* 66* 65* 116* 78* 67* 61* 45* 188 332 157* 214Weighted Base

112 70 42 44 26 18 8 17 25 19 12 4 9 18 6 5 4 7 23 41 18 3013% 13% 11% 14% 13% 12% 6% 15% 14% 16% 15% 6% 14% 16% 8% 8% 7% 17% 12% 12% 12% 14%

g g

Less than 1 (0)

650 365 286 207 129 114 108 92 119 69 61 60 55 88 60 52 48 37 133 249 120 14873% 70% 78% 68% 65% 75% 85% 84% 64% 58% 72% 91% 84% 76% 78% 78% 79% 83% 71% 75% 77% 69%

B DEf DE j IJK IJ i J

1-5

84 51 33 37 21 17 8 1 28 12 8 2 1 8 9 9 6 - 23 30 10 209% 10% 9% 12% 11% 11% 6% 1% 15% 10% 10% 2% 2% 7% 12% 13% 10% - 12% 9% 7% 9%

H H H LM m R R r

6-10

44 38 6 16 21 4 3 - 15 19 4 * - 1 2 - 3 - 8 12 8 165% 7% 2% 5% 11% 2% 3% - 8% 16% 4% 1% - 1% 2% - 5% - 4% 4% 5% 8%

C h dFGH mN iKLMO

11+

3.4 3.8 2.8 3.7 4.6 2.9 2.7 1.7 4.3 5.3 3.1 2.4 1.8 2.6 3.4 2.7 3.0 1.7 3.5 3.2 2.9 3.9C gH dFGH H H kLMN KLMo M m R R r r u

Mean

4.00 4.48 3.10 4.11 5.29 3.25 3.01 1.24 4.71 5.91 3.61 1.80 1.27 2.59 3.90 2.75 3.92 1.20 3.96 3.91 3.19 4.62Std. Dev.0.13 0.19 0.16 0.23 0.36 0.26 0.29 0.11 0.35 0.51 0.36 0.24 0.15 0.22 0.46 0.35 0.54 0.17 0.27 0.21 0.25 0.33Std. Err.

2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Median890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 214100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma










924 273 179 137 315 188 226 510 680 244 480 444 458 466 670 244 530 394 126 100 616Unweighted Base890 196 125* 129* 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162* 120* 492Weighted Base

112 35 11 17 45 37 31 44 69 43 59 54 54 58 70 37 48 64 26 18 5313% 18% 9% 13% 11% 19% 12% 10% 10% 20% 13% 12% 12% 13% 10% 18% 10% 16% 16% 15% 11%

cE H I O Q

Less than 1 (0)

650 150 102 96 291 143 199 307 484 166 304 346 290 360 502 146 353 297 99 87 36973% 76% 81% 75% 68% 72% 79% 70% 72% 75% 66% 80% 66% 80% 74% 70% 74% 72% 61% 73% 75%

e E H K M S

1-5

84 6 8 10 60 11 10 63 76 8 59 25 62 21 70 14 49 35 22 13 439% 3% 6% 8% 14% 5% 4% 14% 11% 4% 13% 6% 14% 5% 10% 7% 10% 8% 13% 11% 9%

b BC FG J L N

6-10

44 5 4 6 29 7 11 26 40 4 38 6 35 9 33 10 30 14 15 2 265% 3% 3% 4% 7% 4% 4% 6% 6% 2% 8% 1% 8% 2% 5% 5% 6% 3% 9% 1% 5%

b J L N t

11+

3.4 2.4 3.3 2.8 4.0 2.8 2.8 3.9 3.8 2.1 4.3 2.4 4.4 2.4 3.4 3.2 3.7 2.9 4.3 3.1 3.4B BD FG J L N R tu

Mean

4.00 2.91 3.68 3.27 4.61 3.30 3.85 4.28 4.26 2.73 4.84 2.49 4.76 2.72 3.94 4.04 4.41 3.41 4.50 3.15 4.21Std. Dev.0.13 0.18 0.27 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.26 0.19 0.16 0.17 0.22 0.12 0.22 0.13 0.15 0.26 0.19 0.17 0.40 0.32 0.17Std. Err.

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2Median890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 492100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5%, 10% risk level) - B/C/D/E - F/G/H - I/J - K/L - M/N - O/P - Q/R - S/T/UOverlap formulae used. * small base






a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


112 - - 7813% - - 12%

Less than 1 (0)

650 650 - 44673% 100% - 71%

C

1-5

84 - 84 719% - 65% 11%

B

6-10

44 - 44 375% - 35% 6%

B

11+

3.4 2.4 11.1 3.6B

Mean

4.00 1.21 5.37 4.20Std. Dev.0.13 0.05 0.49 0.17Std. Err.

2 2 10 2Median890 650 128 631100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma



16 Sep 2020Table 7Q2 What would it take for you to feel comfortable returning to an in-person trade show, expo, business convention or

conference if they were allowed to take place right now? Please select all that apply.






729 456 273 268 185 127 79 70 171 116 74 47 48 98 69 52 32 21 167 264 124 17482% 87% 74% 88% 93% 83% 62% 63% 91% 97% 87% 71% 74% 84% 89% 78% 53% 47% 89% 80% 79% 82%

C GH FGH GH LM KLMo l R QR QR QR Tu

Would Feel ComfortableUnder CertainCircumstances (Net)

478 309 169 164 126 91 52 45 110 82 51 33 34 55 44 41 19 11 99 170 88 12154% 59% 46% 54% 64% 60% 41% 41% 59% 68% 59% 50% 52% 47% 57% 61% 31% 25% 53% 51% 56% 57%

C gh GH GH lm R R QR QR

On-premise safety requirements (e.g., temperature screening, mask requirements, social distancing, enhanced air ventilation)

351 231 120 93 105 64 42 47 67 67 37 27 33 26 39 27 15 14 85 122 47 9839% 44% 33% 31% 53% 42% 33% 43% 36% 55% 43% 41% 51% 22% 50% 40% 24% 31% 46% 37% 30% 46%

C DfG d d n I r NQr N tU U

Widely available vaccine

273 194 79 95 76 46 32 24 69 59 29 19 18 26 17 17 13 6 64 93 30 8731% 37% 22% 31% 38% 30% 25% 22% 37% 49% 34% 29% 27% 23% 22% 25% 21% 13% 34% 28% 19% 41%

C gH n ikLMO U TU

Accurate and widely available on-site rapid tests

209 139 70 103 58 23 18 7 66 41 18 12 3 37 17 6 6 4 57 65 38 5023% 26% 19% 34% 29% 15% 14% 6% 35% 34% 20% 18% 4% 32% 22% 9% 11% 9% 30% 19% 24% 23%

C FGH FGH h kLM klM M m PQR T

An NBA-style bubble, with no excursions allowed beyond convention-site hotels/restaurants and no non-registered outside visitors

141 95 46 69 36 17 15 4 43 27 12 8 4 26 9 5 7 - 35 47 24 3516% 18% 13% 23% 18% 11% 12% 4% 23% 23% 14% 13% 6% 22% 12% 7% 11% - 19% 14% 15% 16%

c FGH H h h M M PR r r

Boss’s orders

57 30 28 26 15 2 10 5 14 6 1 6 2 12 8 * 4 3 20 14 13 106% 6% 8% 9% 8% 1% 8% 4% 7% 5% 2% 10% 2% 10% 11% 1% 6% 7% 11% 4% 8% 5%

F F F k p p Tv

Other

162 68 93 35 13 26 48 40 17 4 11 19 17 18 9 14 29 24 21 68 33 4018% 13% 26% 12% 7% 17% 38% 37% 9% 3% 13% 29% 26% 16% 11% 22% 47% 53% 11% 20% 21% 18%

B E DEF DEF J IJk IJ j NOP NOPM S s

Nothing - I would not feelcomfortable returning tothese types of in-personevents if they were allowedto take place right now

1672 1065 606 585 430 269 216 171 385 286 160 124 110 200 143 110 92 62 381 579 272 440188% 203% 166% 193% 217% 177% 170% 156% 206% 238% 186% 188% 169% 172% 185% 164% 151% 137% 203% 174% 173% 206%

Sigma











729 148 101 106 365 152 199 378 580 149 418 310 399 330 555 169 388 341 144 102 38482% 75% 81% 82% 86% 77% 79% 86% 87% 67% 91% 72% 90% 74% 82% 82% 81% 83% 89% 84% 78%

B Fg J L N U


478 95 63 64 250 85 137 257 388 90 276 202 268 210 369 105 258 221 95 65 25954% 49% 50% 50% 59% 43% 54% 58% 58% 41% 60% 47% 61% 47% 55% 51% 54% 54% 59% 54% 53%

B f F J L N


351 64 40 55 189 55 87 210 281 70 192 160 183 168 283 68 211 140 69 35 19539% 33% 32% 42% 44% 28% 34% 48% 42% 32% 42% 37% 41% 38% 42% 33% 44% 34% 43% 29% 40%

BC FG J p R


273 51 32 35 152 36 63 175 219 54 161 112 159 114 216 55 159 115 51 37 14631% 26% 25% 27% 36% 18% 25% 40% 33% 25% 35% 26% 36% 25% 32% 26% 33% 28% 32% 31% 30%

Bc FG j L N


209 38 23 37 110 34 64 111 172 37 140 69 147 62 165 44 113 96 71 34 9523% 19% 18% 29% 26% 17% 26% 25% 26% 17% 30% 16% 33% 14% 24% 21% 23% 23% 44% 28% 19%

bc f f J L N tU


141 31 12 11 86 21 30 90 129 12 97 45 93 48 113 28 82 60 41 16 6716% 16% 10% 9% 20% 11% 12% 20% 19% 6% 21% 10% 21% 11% 17% 13% 17% 15% 26% 13% 14%

CD FG J L N tU

Boss’s orders

57 13 11 12 21 23 14 21 41 17 30 27 25 33 45 12 20 38 13 10 246% 7% 9% 10% 5% 11% 6% 5% 6% 8% 7% 6% 6% 7% 7% 6% 4% 9% 8% 9% 5%

gH Q

Other

162 48 24 23 60 47 52 63 89 73 42 120 43 119 121 38 92 69 18 19 10818% 25% 19% 18% 14% 23% 21% 14% 13% 33% 9% 28% 10% 26% 18% 18% 19% 17% 11% 16% 22%

E H h I K M S


1672 340 203 238 868 299 446 927 1318 353 938 734 918 754 1312 349 934 738 359 216 893188% 174% 163% 185% 204% 151% 178% 210% 197% 160% 204% 171% 208% 168% 194% 169% 194% 180% 222% 179% 182%

Sigma







a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


729 523 119 51682% 80% 93% 82%

B


478 353 79 35954% 54% 62% 57%


351 251 61 25539% 39% 48% 40%


273 188 54 21631% 29% 42% 34%

B


209 119 65 17023% 18% 51% 27%

B


141 83 44 10916% 13% 35% 17%

B

Boss’s orders

57 42 9 386% 6% 7% 6%

Other

162 127 9 11518% 20% 7% 18%

C


1672 1163 322 1262188% 179% 251% 200%

Sigma



16 Sep 2020Table 10Q3 What size trade show, expo, business convention or conference would you feel comfortable attending in person as soon as they are permitted to be held?






761 462 300 284 184 132 91 71 177 116 77 49 43 107 68 55 42 28 171 266 130 19486% 88% 82% 94% 93% 86% 71% 64% 95% 97% 89% 74% 66% 92% 88% 83% 68% 62% 91% 80% 83% 91%

C FGH fGH GH LM kLMo lM QR QR R Tu Tu

Would Feel ComfortableAttending As Soon AsThey Are Permitted (Net)

214 112 102 73 44 35 28 34 44 24 14 12 18 29 20 21 16 16 49 76 30 5924% 21% 28% 24% 22% 23% 22% 31% 23% 20% 16% 18% 28% 25% 25% 31% 26% 36% 26% 23% 19% 28%

b k

Less than 50 people

127 75 52 50 27 30 12 8 26 19 16 7 6 24 8 13 5 2 28 40 30 3014% 14% 14% 17% 14% 19% 9% 7% 14% 16% 19% 10% 9% 21% 10% 20% 8% 5% 15% 12% 19% 14%

h gH qR r

50 to 99 people

173 109 65 69 44 32 16 11 46 25 21 9 8 24 19 11 8 3 32 65 35 4119% 21% 18% 23% 22% 21% 13% 10% 24% 21% 24% 13% 12% 21% 25% 17% 12% 7% 17% 19% 22% 19%

gH gH h r R

100 to 499 people

119 85 34 53 27 15 16 8 36 21 11 12 4 17 6 4 4 4 33 43 15 2913% 16% 9% 17% 14% 10% 13% 7% 19% 18% 13% 19% 6% 14% 7% 6% 6% 8% 17% 13% 9% 13%

C H m m u

500 to 999 people

66 47 19 17 19 13 12 5 11 14 11 7 3 6 5 2 5 2 9 27 15 157% 9% 5% 6% 10% 8% 9% 4% 6% 12% 13% 11% 5% 5% 6% 2% 8% 4% 5% 8% 9% 7%

c p

1,000 to 9,999 people

62 34 28 20 23 7 7 5 14 12 3 2 4 7 11 5 5 1 20 16 6 207% 6% 8% 7% 12% 5% 5% 4% 7% 10% 3% 3% 6% 6% 14% 7% 8% 2% 11% 5% 4% 10%

fh r Tu t

10,000+ people

129 62 67 19 13 21 37 39 10 4 9 17 22 9 10 12 19 17 17 66 27 1914% 12% 18% 6% 7% 14% 29% 36% 5% 3% 11% 26% 34% 8% 12% 17% 32% 38% 9% 20% 17% 9%

B De DEF DEF j IJk IJK j NO NOP SV sv

None - I would not becomfortable attendingthese types of in-personevents when they arepermitted

890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 214100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma










761 167 113 107 366 170 207 384 605 156 430 331 415 346 575 181 397 364 158 104 39786% 85% 91% 83% 86% 86% 82% 87% 90% 71% 93% 77% 94% 77% 85% 87% 83% 89% 97% 86% 81%

J L N Q TU


214 66 33 20 92 59 62 93 155 58 91 122 89 124 149 63 89 125 32 35 11824% 34% 26% 15% 22% 30% 25% 21% 23% 26% 20% 28% 20% 28% 22% 31% 18% 30% 20% 29% 24%

DE d h K M O Q

Less than 50 people

127 38 29 18 41 36 34 58 102 25 73 55 62 65 85 41 68 60 25 15 6714% 19% 23% 14% 10% 18% 14% 13% 15% 12% 16% 13% 14% 15% 13% 20% 14% 15% 15% 13% 14%

E dE O

50 to 99 people

173 29 24 31 87 33 41 99 144 29 114 59 109 64 145 28 101 72 41 26 8919% 15% 19% 24% 20% 17% 16% 22% 22% 13% 25% 14% 25% 14% 21% 14% 21% 18% 26% 21% 18%

b J L N P

100 to 499 people

119 18 13 23 65 25 30 65 102 18 81 39 83 36 98 20 67 53 31 20 5913% 9% 10% 18% 15% 12% 12% 15% 15% 8% 18% 9% 19% 8% 14% 10% 14% 13% 19% 17% 12%

B b J L N

500 to 999 people

66 6 8 9 41 6 28 33 52 14 36 30 34 32 54 12 46 19 8 5 427% 3% 7% 7% 10% 3% 11% 7% 8% 6% 8% 7% 8% 7% 8% 6% 10% 5% 5% 4% 9%

B F f R

1,000 to 9,999 people

62 10 6 6 40 12 12 38 51 12 36 27 38 24 44 16 26 36 21 2 227% 5% 5% 5% 9% 6% 5% 9% 8% 5% 8% 6% 9% 5% 7% 8% 5% 9% 13% 2% 5%

TU

10,000+ people

129 29 12 21 59 28 45 56 64 65 30 99 27 102 100 26 83 46 4 17 9514% 15% 9% 17% 14% 14% 18% 13% 10% 29% 7% 23% 6% 23% 15% 13% 17% 11% 3% 14% 19%

I K M R S S


890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 492100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma






a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


761 548 124 54486% 84% 97% 86%

B


214 164 24 13824% 25% 19% 22%

Less than 50 people

127 103 13 9014% 16% 10% 14%

50 to 99 people

173 129 28 12719% 20% 22% 20%

100 to 499 people

119 69 28 8413% 11% 22% 13%

B

500 to 999 people

66 49 9 577% 8% 7% 9%

1,000 to 9,999 people

62 34 22 487% 5% 17% 8%

B

10,000+ people

129 103 4 8714% 16% 3% 14%

C


890 650 128 631100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma



16 Sep 2020Table 13Q4_1 When do you foresee flying or driving to another city to attend one of these in-person events again?

Driving






322 209 114 130 87 55 34 17 87 61 30 16 14 42 26 25 18 3 66 107 57 9136% 40% 31% 43% 44% 36% 27% 16% 47% 51% 35% 25% 21% 36% 33% 37% 29% 8% 35% 32% 36% 43%

C GH GH H LM kLMo R R R R t

Immediately

218 136 82 69 63 46 24 16 46 37 33 10 9 23 26 13 14 7 52 77 46 4325% 26% 22% 23% 32% 30% 19% 14% 25% 31% 39% 16% 13% 20% 33% 19% 23% 15% 28% 23% 29% 20%

dGH gH lM iLMP nr

Within 6 months

161 80 81 41 33 20 34 33 20 12 9 20 19 21 21 11 14 13 38 71 21 3018% 15% 22% 14% 17% 13% 27% 30% 11% 10% 10% 30% 30% 18% 27% 17% 23% 30% 20% 21% 13% 14%

B DeF DEF IJK IJK J

7 months to 1 year

98 52 46 25 9 20 19 25 14 4 8 11 15 11 5 12 8 10 18 39 15 2611% 10% 13% 8% 5% 13% 15% 23% 8% 4% 9% 16% 24% 9% 6% 18% 14% 22% 10% 12% 9% 12%

E E DEf J IJK o nO

More than 1 year-2 years

45 26 19 20 3 5 8 9 11 3 - 7 5 10 - 5 1 4 6 18 13 85% 5% 5% 7% 2% 3% 6% 9% 6% 3% - 10% 8% 8% - 7% 1% 9% 3% 5% 8% 4%

E E k K K o ok O

More than 2 years

26 12 13 8 2 4 4 8 5 2 3 2 1 3 - 1 2 7 4 8 3 113% 2% 4% 3% 1% 2% 3% 7% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% - 1% 4% 15% 2% 3% 2% 5%

dE NOPqM

Never

21 9 11 10 1 3 5 2 4 * 3 1 1 6 1 1 4 * 3 11 3 42% 2% 3% 3% * 2% 4% 1% 2% * 3% 2% 2% 5% 1% 1% 6% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2%

e

N/A - I never used thisform of transportation toattend

890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 214100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Driving







322 68 42 34 174 71 83 168 258 65 192 130 186 136 243 75 168 154 72 42 17636% 34% 34% 26% 41% 36% 33% 38% 38% 29% 42% 30% 42% 30% 36% 36% 35% 37% 44% 35% 36%

D J L N

Immediately

218 50 36 35 96 42 59 118 183 35 138 80 134 84 170 47 133 86 44 23 12225% 26% 29% 27% 23% 21% 23% 27% 27% 16% 30% 19% 30% 19% 25% 23% 28% 21% 27% 19% 25%

J L N r

Within 6 months

161 27 24 27 80 32 50 78 122 38 65 96 57 104 127 34 83 77 15 19 10118% 14% 19% 21% 19% 16% 20% 18% 18% 17% 14% 22% 13% 23% 19% 16% 17% 19% 9% 16% 21%

K M S

7 months to 1 year

98 26 11 13 44 23 26 49 59 39 30 68 35 64 74 25 52 46 16 21 4511% 13% 9% 10% 10% 12% 10% 11% 9% 18% 7% 16% 8% 14% 11% 12% 11% 11% 10% 18% 9%

I K M U


45 9 5 14 15 17 15 13 25 20 20 25 16 29 34 11 25 20 6 11 205% 4% 4% 11% 4% 8% 6% 3% 4% 9% 4% 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 4% 9% 4%

BcE H I u

More than 2 years

26 9 3 3 10 7 14 5 9 16 7 19 6 19 18 6 12 14 6 2 173% 5% 3% 2% 2% 4% 5% 1% 1% 7% 1% 4% 1% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3%

H I K M

Never

21 8 3 3 6 6 5 10 13 8 8 12 8 13 10 9 7 14 3 2 112% 4% 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 4% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2%

e O


890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 492100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Driving



a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


322 219 66 22736% 34% 51% 36%

B

Immediately

218 168 30 15925% 26% 23% 25%

Within 6 months

161 129 16 10918% 20% 13% 17%

7 months to 1 year

98 76 10 7311% 12% 8% 12%


45 33 1 325% 5% 1% 5%

More than 2 years

26 13 4 183% 2% 3% 3%

Never

21 12 * 142% 2% * 2%


890 650 128 631100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Flying






126 81 45 58 44 14 8 3 36 33 5 4 3 22 11 8 4 * 24 44 19 3914% 15% 12% 19% 22% 9% 6% 3% 19% 27% 6% 6% 5% 19% 14% 12% 6% 1% 13% 13% 12% 18%

FGH FGH KlM KLMo qR R r

Immediately

235 152 83 87 63 55 18 11 55 46 38 5 7 32 17 18 13 3 57 78 47 5326% 29% 23% 29% 32% 36% 14% 10% 30% 38% 44% 7% 11% 28% 22% 26% 22% 8% 30% 23% 30% 25%

GH GH GH LM LMo iLMp R r R rl

Within 6 months

198 122 76 61 41 22 47 26 38 23 19 26 16 23 19 3 22 10 49 74 34 4122% 23% 21% 20% 21% 15% 37% 24% 20% 19% 22% 39% 25% 19% 24% 5% 35% 23% 26% 22% 22% 19%

DEFh P IJk P P nP P

7 months to 1 year

167 90 77 52 22 39 25 29 36 11 11 14 18 16 11 27 11 12 31 58 27 5119% 17% 21% 17% 11% 26% 20% 27% 19% 9% 13% 21% 27% 13% 14% 41% 18% 26% 16% 17% 17% 24%

dE e dE j j Jk NOQK n


57 32 24 17 7 9 12 13 6 1 6 8 11 11 6 2 4 2 4 25 10 176% 6% 7% 6% 3% 6% 9% 12% 3% 1% 7% 12% 17% 9% 8% 4% 6% 4% 2% 8% 6% 8%

e dE J IJ IJr i J S s

More than 2 years

37 19 18 16 4 2 5 10 12 2 - 2 2 4 2 2 3 7 8 13 8 74% 4% 5% 5% 2% 1% 4% 9% 6% 2% - 4% 3% 4% 2% 3% 4% 16% 4% 4% 5% 3%

EF k NOPqM

Never

70 29 41 13 17 11 12 18 5 5 6 7 8 8 12 6 5 10 14 39 11 68% 6% 11% 4% 8% 7% 9% 16% 3% 4% 6% 10% 12% 7% 16% 9% 8% 22% 7% 12% 7% 3%

B Df i I J Npq V


890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 214100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Flying







126 23 20 12 71 24 30 72 112 15 83 43 87 40 100 22 72 54 39 10 6414% 12% 16% 9% 17% 12% 12% 16% 17% 7% 18% 10% 20% 9% 15% 11% 15% 13% 24% 8% 13%

J L N TU

Immediately

235 38 25 32 139 43 54 138 194 41 159 76 157 78 185 50 156 79 42 30 13526% 19% 20% 25% 33% 22% 22% 31% 29% 18% 35% 18% 35% 17% 27% 24% 32% 19% 26% 25% 28%

BC fG J L N R

Within 6 months

198 35 34 32 93 37 60 101 154 44 99 99 95 103 144 54 101 97 36 27 10622% 18% 28% 25% 22% 19% 24% 23% 23% 20% 21% 23% 22% 23% 21% 26% 21% 24% 22% 22% 22%

b

7 months to 1 year

167 36 22 24 81 31 50 85 120 47 74 93 62 104 123 43 77 89 27 27 8519% 19% 18% 18% 19% 16% 20% 19% 18% 21% 16% 22% 14% 23% 18% 21% 16% 22% 17% 22% 17%

k M q


57 16 5 9 26 18 16 23 42 15 13 44 13 44 45 12 34 23 10 10 306% 8% 4% 7% 6% 9% 6% 5% 6% 7% 3% 10% 3% 10% 7% 6% 7% 6% 6% 8% 6%

K M

More than 2 years

37 17 5 4 9 15 17 5 16 21 14 23 12 25 26 9 14 22 4 5 264% 9% 4% 3% 2% 7% 7% 1% 2% 9% 3% 5% 3% 6% 4% 5% 3% 5% 3% 4% 5%

dE H H I m

Never

70 31 13 17 6 30 24 16 31 39 19 52 16 54 52 16 26 45 3 13 468% 16% 10% 13% 1% 15% 10% 4% 5% 18% 4% 12% 4% 12% 8% 8% 5% 11% 2% 11% 9%

E E E H H I K M Q S S


890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 492100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Flying



a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


126 76 35 9714% 12% 27% 15%

B

Immediately

235 173 39 16326% 27% 31% 26%

Within 6 months

198 152 24 14422% 23% 19% 23%

7 months to 1 year

167 125 21 12019% 19% 16% 19%


57 47 3 406% 7% 2% 6%

More than 2 years

37 18 7 244% 3% 5% 4%

Never

70 60 - 448% 9% - 7%

C


890 650 128 631100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma



16 Sep 2020Table 19Q6 Do you believe virtual trade shows/expos/business conventions or conferences are better, worse, or equal to in-person trade shows/expos/business

conventions or conferences, overall (e.g., productive, efficient, experience, convenience, benefits)?

Virtual trade shows/expos/business conventions or conferences are...






203 142 61 63 79 31 16 14 47 61 25 4 5 17 18 6 12 9 53 76 27 4723% 27% 17% 21% 40% 21% 12% 13% 25% 51% 29% 5% 8% 14% 23% 9% 20% 20% 28% 23% 17% 22%

C DFGH LMn IKLMO LMP l u

Much/Somewhat Better(Net)

81 55 26 22 39 6 7 6 13 34 5 1 2 9 6 1 6 4 22 27 9 229% 10% 7% 7% 20% 4% 6% 6% 7% 28% 6% 1% 3% 7% 7% 1% 10% 9% 12% 8% 6% 10%

DFGH IKLMO pl p

Much better

122 87 36 41 39 25 8 8 33 27 20 3 3 8 12 5 6 5 31 48 18 2514% 17% 10% 14% 20% 16% 7% 7% 18% 23% 23% 4% 5% 7% 15% 8% 9% 11% 17% 15% 12% 11%

C GH gh LmN LM LMp

Somewhat better

205 107 98 89 31 37 29 20 50 16 17 12 13 39 15 20 17 7 48 73 36 4823% 20% 27% 29% 16% 24% 23% 18% 27% 13% 20% 19% 20% 33% 19% 30% 28% 16% 25% 22% 23% 23%

b Eh J r

Equal

483 275 207 151 88 85 83 76 91 43 44 50 47 60 45 41 32 29 87 184 94 11954% 53% 57% 50% 45% 55% 65% 69% 49% 36% 51% 76% 73% 52% 58% 61% 53% 64% 46% 55% 60% 56%

DE DEf j j IJKQ IJK J s s

Much/Somewhat Worse(Net)

316 175 141 92 67 58 52 47 55 30 29 33 29 38 37 30 18 18 54 126 63 7436% 33% 39% 30% 34% 38% 41% 43% 29% 25% 34% 51% 44% 33% 48% 44% 30% 40% 29% 38% 40% 35%

d IJq iJ J s s

Somewhat worse

166 100 66 59 21 26 31 29 36 14 15 17 18 23 8 11 14 11 32 58 31 4519% 19% 18% 19% 11% 17% 24% 27% 19% 11% 17% 26% 28% 19% 10% 17% 23% 24% 17% 18% 20% 21%

E E E j J o

Much worse

890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 214100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma












203 34 17 22 126 28 49 126 173 29 144 59 142 61 174 28 145 58 41 25 12123% 18% 14% 17% 30% 14% 19% 29% 26% 13% 31% 14% 32% 14% 26% 14% 30% 14% 25% 21% 25%

BCD FG J L N P R


81 9 4 6 62 7 21 52 68 13 58 23 61 19 72 8 62 19 18 8 529% 4% 4% 5% 15% 4% 8% 12% 10% 6% 13% 5% 14% 4% 11% 4% 13% 5% 11% 7% 11%

BCD F L N P R

Much better

122 26 13 16 64 21 28 74 106 17 86 37 80 42 102 20 84 39 23 17 6914% 13% 10% 13% 15% 11% 11% 17% 16% 7% 19% 9% 18% 9% 15% 10% 17% 9% 14% 14% 14%

J L N R

Somewhat better

205 58 32 25 84 60 63 81 144 61 112 93 103 102 145 58 80 125 39 37 10323% 30% 26% 19% 20% 30% 25% 18% 22% 28% 24% 22% 23% 23% 21% 28% 17% 30% 24% 31% 21%

dE H o Q u

Equal

483 104 76 82 216 110 140 233 352 131 205 278 197 285 357 120 255 228 82 58 26854% 53% 61% 64% 51% 55% 56% 53% 53% 59% 45% 65% 45% 64% 53% 58% 53% 56% 51% 48% 54%

E K M


316 68 41 62 140 62 94 160 236 80 147 169 135 181 242 73 169 147 42 49 17536% 35% 33% 48% 33% 31% 37% 36% 35% 36% 32% 39% 31% 40% 36% 35% 35% 36% 26% 40% 36%

BCE k M s

Somewhat worse

166 35 34 20 76 47 45 74 116 51 58 109 62 104 114 47 86 80 40 9 9219% 18% 27% 16% 18% 24% 18% 17% 17% 23% 13% 25% 14% 23% 17% 23% 18% 20% 25% 8% 19%

bde K M T T

Much worse

890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 492100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma








a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


203 129 56 14223% 20% 44% 22%

B


81 48 26 599% 7% 20% 9%

B

Much better

122 80 30 8314% 12% 24% 13%

B

Somewhat better

205 145 30 13823% 22% 23% 22%

Equal

483 377 42 35154% 58% 33% 56%

C


316 240 31 21736% 37% 24% 34%

C

Somewhat worse

166 137 11 13519% 21% 9% 21%

C

Much worse

890 650 128 631100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma



16 Sep 2020Table 22Q7 Which of the following are among the things you miss most about attending in-person trade shows/expos/business

conventions or conferences since the COVID-19 pandemic hit? Please select all that apply.






867 515 353 297 193 149 123 105 186 116 82 66 64 111 77 66 58 41 183 321 154 21097% 98% 96% 98% 98% 97% 97% 96% 99% 97% 96% 99% 99% 96% 99% 99% 94% 91% 98% 97% 98% 98%

kn r r

Miss Something (Net)

521 312 209 181 119 90 75 56 115 75 46 43 33 66 44 44 32 23 108 193 94 12659% 60% 57% 60% 60% 59% 59% 51% 62% 62% 54% 65% 51% 57% 57% 66% 52% 52% 57% 58% 60% 59%

Socializing/entertaining

521 299 222 138 104 103 101 75 81 63 56 56 44 57 40 48 46 31 96 195 95 13559% 57% 61% 45% 52% 68% 80% 68% 43% 53% 65% 84% 67% 49% 52% 71% 75% 70% 51% 59% 60% 63%

DE DEf DE I IJKm I No NO N s

Trying out new products

468 302 166 147 118 72 75 56 102 78 38 44 40 45 40 34 31 16 115 158 74 12153% 58% 45% 48% 60% 47% 59% 51% 54% 65% 45% 67% 61% 39% 52% 51% 51% 36% 61% 48% 47% 56%

C df N K K R TU

Networking

448 268 180 136 108 73 75 56 88 63 45 40 33 48 46 29 35 23 97 172 67 11250% 51% 49% 45% 55% 48% 59% 51% 47% 52% 52% 61% 50% 41% 59% 43% 57% 51% 52% 52% 43% 53%

d D n

Sharing knowledge

295 193 103 102 74 55 35 29 71 51 29 23 20 31 23 27 12 9 62 105 50 7933% 37% 28% 34% 37% 36% 28% 26% 38% 42% 33% 35% 30% 27% 30% 40% 20% 20% 33% 31% 32% 37%

C qr

Sales/supplier leads

49 29 20 17 9 9 9 5 10 5 7 4 3 7 4 2 5 2 14 19 10 65% 6% 5% 6% 4% 6% 7% 5% 6% 4% 8% 6% 5% 6% 5% 4% 8% 4% 7% 6% 6% 3%

Other

23 10 14 6 4 4 4 5 1 4 4 * 1 5 1 * 4 4 5 11 3 43% 2% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4% 1% 3% 4% 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 6% 9% 2% 3% 2% 2%

i i op

Nothing

2326 1413 913 727 537 407 374 281 469 338 223 210 173 258 199 184 164 108 496 854 393 583261% 270% 249% 240% 271% 267% 294% 256% 250% 281% 261% 318% 266% 223% 256% 275% 268% 241% 264% 257% 250% 273%

Sigma











867 186 123 124 419 186 247 435 663 204 452 415 433 434 660 201 468 399 158 118 47597% 95% 99% 96% 98% 94% 98% 99% 99% 92% 98% 97% 98% 97% 98% 97% 97% 97% 98% 98% 97%

b B f F J


521 108 72 72 262 101 154 267 411 110 268 253 266 255 395 122 280 241 92 72 29559% 55% 57% 56% 62% 51% 61% 61% 61% 50% 58% 59% 60% 57% 59% 59% 58% 59% 57% 60% 60%

f f J


521 114 77 75 246 107 165 249 380 141 241 280 233 288 391 127 284 237 74 67 30759% 58% 62% 59% 58% 54% 66% 56% 57% 64% 52% 65% 53% 64% 58% 62% 59% 58% 46% 56% 62%

fh K M S


468 72 66 64 261 63 123 283 381 88 237 231 227 241 360 106 266 203 79 52 25953% 37% 53% 49% 61% 32% 49% 64% 57% 40% 51% 54% 51% 54% 53% 51% 55% 49% 49% 43% 53%

B b Bd F FG J

Networking

448 84 59 63 237 77 125 246 359 90 235 214 227 221 346 100 254 195 87 55 24550% 43% 47% 49% 56% 39% 50% 56% 54% 41% 51% 50% 51% 49% 51% 48% 53% 47% 54% 46% 50%

B f F J

Sharing knowledge

295 59 33 40 161 55 88 153 245 51 178 118 178 118 234 61 176 119 77 31 14833% 30% 26% 31% 38% 28% 35% 35% 37% 23% 39% 27% 40% 26% 35% 29% 37% 29% 47% 25% 30%

c J L N r TU


49 12 5 12 17 21 11 17 35 13 19 30 13 36 36 12 16 33 3 10 225% 6% 4% 10% 4% 10% 4% 4% 5% 6% 4% 7% 3% 8% 5% 6% 3% 8% 2% 9% 4%

E gH M Q s

Other

23 10 2 5 7 12 5 6 6 17 9 15 9 14 15 6 12 11 3 2 163% 5% 1% 4% 2% 6% 2% 1% 1% 8% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3%

cE gH I

Nothing

2326 459 314 331 1189 436 670 1220 1817 509 1186 1141 1153 1173 1778 535 1287 1039 416 288 1292261% 234% 251% 257% 280% 220% 267% 277% 271% 230% 257% 265% 261% 262% 263% 258% 268% 253% 257% 239% 263%

Sigma







a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


867 641 127 61897% 99% 100% 98%


521 400 77 37659% 62% 60% 60%


521 426 55 37459% 65% 43% 59%

C


468 337 87 35953% 52% 68% 57%

B

Networking

448 336 72 32750% 52% 56% 52%

Sharing knowledge

295 199 66 22133% 31% 51% 35%

B


49 37 3 325% 6% 3% 5%

Other

23 9 1 143% 1% * 2%

Nothing

2326 1744 361 1702261% 268% 282% 270%

Sigma



16 Sep 2020Table 25Q8 Overall, how well do you believe local governments in each of the following top convention cities managed the COVID-19 pandemic so far?

Summary Of Well






206 147 59 94 61 31 10 10 62 49 22 6 8 32 12 9 4 2 50 58 34 6323% 28% 16% 31% 31% 20% 8% 9% 33% 41% 25% 8% 13% 28% 15% 13% 7% 4% 27% 18% 22% 30%

C fGH fGH GH LM kLMO L pQR T T

Las Vegas

172 115 57 55 68 23 17 10 31 49 19 7 8 24 19 4 9 2 42 58 31 4219% 22% 16% 18% 34% 15% 13% 9% 17% 41% 23% 11% 12% 21% 24% 5% 15% 4% 22% 17% 20% 20%

c h DFGH IKLMo P PR PR

Orlando

160 114 46 63 62 21 10 4 43 47 17 5 2 20 15 4 5 2 49 51 24 3518% 22% 13% 21% 32% 14% 8% 3% 23% 39% 20% 7% 3% 17% 20% 7% 8% 4% 26% 15% 15% 16%

C GH DFGH H LM IKLMO Mp r pr Tuv

Chicago

158 109 49 64 52 27 9 6 39 38 22 8 4 25 15 5 2 2 44 52 24 3718% 21% 13% 21% 26% 18% 7% 5% 21% 31% 25% 11% 6% 21% 19% 8% 3% 5% 24% 16% 16% 17%

C GH GH GH M LM lMP pQR Qr t

Dallas

158 113 45 67 51 25 12 3 43 40 20 8 1 24 11 4 4 2 37 50 28 4318% 22% 12% 22% 26% 16% 10% 3% 23% 33% 24% 13% 1% 21% 14% 6% 7% 4% 20% 15% 18% 20%

C GH fGH H h M LMO MP m pqR

Atlanta




Summary Of Well







206 33 25 26 122 41 42 123 171 35 150 56 151 54 180 26 132 74 59 24 10423% 17% 20% 20% 29% 21% 17% 28% 26% 16% 33% 13% 34% 12% 27% 12% 27% 18% 36% 20% 21%

B G J L N P R tU

Las Vegas

172 24 26 23 99 38 37 97 149 23 117 55 121 50 145 26 116 56 42 22 8919% 12% 20% 18% 23% 19% 15% 22% 22% 10% 25% 13% 27% 11% 22% 12% 24% 14% 26% 19% 18%

b B g J L N P R

Orlando

160 27 16 17 99 19 33 107 144 15 114 45 115 45 134 25 102 57 40 20 8918% 14% 13% 13% 23% 10% 13% 24% 22% 7% 25% 11% 26% 10% 20% 12% 21% 14% 25% 17% 18%

BCd FG J L N P R

Chicago

158 22 22 14 99 27 27 104 145 13 121 37 121 37 141 17 102 56 44 29 7518% 11% 18% 11% 23% 14% 11% 24% 22% 6% 26% 9% 27% 8% 21% 8% 21% 14% 27% 24% 15%

BD FG J L N P R U

Dallas

158 28 20 15 93 41 23 94 143 15 117 41 121 36 125 32 98 59 51 19 8418% 15% 16% 12% 22% 21% 9% 21% 21% 7% 25% 10% 27% 8% 18% 15% 20% 14% 32% 16% 17%

bd G G J L N r TU

Atlanta




Summary Of Well



a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


206 126 59 15123% 19% 46% 24%

B

Las Vegas

172 110 42 12619% 17% 33% 20%

B

Orlando

160 88 56 12418% 14% 43% 20%

B

Chicago

158 94 43 10118% 14% 34% 16%

B

Dallas

158 84 49 10618% 13% 39% 17%

B

Atlanta




Summary Of OK






459 267 192 162 95 86 60 55 107 55 45 29 31 55 41 41 31 25 83 185 82 10952% 51% 52% 53% 48% 56% 47% 50% 57% 46% 53% 44% 47% 47% 52% 61% 51% 56% 44% 56% 52% 51%

S

Dallas

441 265 176 161 89 76 56 60 105 50 43 29 38 56 38 33 27 22 79 175 82 10550% 51% 48% 53% 45% 50% 44% 54% 56% 42% 51% 43% 59% 48% 50% 49% 44% 48% 42% 53% 52% 49%

j j s

Atlanta

422 225 198 139 86 70 73 55 79 41 38 37 30 60 44 32 36 25 81 173 82 8747% 43% 54% 46% 43% 46% 58% 50% 42% 34% 44% 56% 45% 52% 57% 48% 59% 56% 43% 52% 52% 41%

B de J J v

Las Vegas

411 234 177 156 83 66 56 50 91 49 34 31 30 65 34 33 26 19 85 153 71 10146% 45% 48% 51% 42% 44% 44% 45% 49% 40% 39% 46% 47% 56% 44% 49% 42% 43% 45% 46% 45% 47%

Chicago

402 240 162 163 72 71 51 45 107 45 37 26 25 56 26 34 25 20 79 147 72 10445% 46% 44% 54% 36% 47% 40% 41% 57% 38% 43% 40% 38% 48% 34% 51% 41% 46% 42% 44% 46% 49%

Egh JklM

Orlando




Summary Of OK







459 105 61 65 222 109 134 216 336 122 245 213 233 226 342 111 227 232 71 67 25952% 54% 49% 51% 52% 55% 53% 49% 50% 55% 53% 50% 53% 50% 51% 53% 47% 57% 44% 56% 53%

Q

Dallas

441 106 61 64 204 87 129 225 317 124 230 211 213 228 343 93 220 221 74 65 24150% 54% 49% 49% 48% 44% 51% 51% 47% 56% 50% 49% 48% 51% 51% 45% 46% 54% 46% 54% 49%

i q

Atlanta

422 103 54 70 185 94 121 207 312 111 207 215 192 230 319 98 217 205 56 64 24547% 53% 44% 54% 43% 48% 48% 47% 47% 50% 45% 50% 43% 51% 47% 47% 45% 50% 35% 53% 50%

e e m S S

Las Vegas

411 102 51 61 187 84 103 224 306 105 213 198 210 201 308 98 208 203 79 60 22246% 52% 40% 48% 44% 42% 41% 51% 46% 47% 46% 46% 48% 45% 46% 47% 43% 49% 49% 50% 45%

c g

Chicago

402 87 48 61 200 100 104 199 296 106 227 176 216 186 320 78 216 186 75 56 21945% 45% 39% 47% 47% 50% 41% 45% 44% 48% 49% 41% 49% 41% 47% 38% 45% 45% 46% 47% 45%

l n p

Orlando




Summary Of OK



a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


459 340 60 33052% 52% 47% 52%

Dallas

441 332 61 31250% 51% 48% 49%

Atlanta

422 327 53 30347% 50% 41% 48%

Las Vegas

411 296 55 28846% 46% 43% 46%

Chicago

402 290 69 29245% 45% 54% 46%

Orlando




Summary Of Poorly






320 176 144 85 53 65 61 57 53 24 35 31 33 32 28 29 31 24 53 128 62 7736% 34% 39% 28% 27% 43% 48% 52% 28% 20% 41% 46% 51% 27% 36% 44% 50% 53% 28% 38% 39% 36%

DE DE DE iJ IJ IJ j n N N s

Chicago

316 169 147 85 58 58 59 55 49 26 29 33 32 36 33 29 27 22 67 127 54 6836% 32% 40% 28% 30% 38% 47% 50% 26% 21% 34% 49% 50% 31% 42% 44% 44% 50% 36% 38% 35% 32%

b d DE DE j IJ IJ J n

Orlando

292 146 146 75 59 51 59 47 39 30 22 29 26 36 29 30 30 21 71 107 48 6633% 28% 40% 25% 30% 34% 47% 43% 21% 25% 25% 44% 40% 31% 37% 44% 49% 48% 38% 32% 30% 31%

B DEf De IJk Ij k n n

Atlanta

274 149 125 78 50 40 58 49 41 28 19 30 31 37 22 21 28 18 61 95 51 6731% 28% 34% 26% 25% 26% 46% 44% 22% 23% 22% 45% 47% 32% 29% 31% 46% 39% 32% 29% 32% 31%

DEF DEF IJK IJK

Dallas

262 152 110 70 51 52 44 45 46 29 26 24 27 24 21 26 20 18 57 101 41 6429% 29% 30% 23% 26% 34% 35% 41% 25% 24% 30% 36% 42% 21% 28% 39% 33% 40% 30% 30% 26% 30%

d d DE Ij N N

Las Vegas




Summary Of Poorly







320 67 58 50 139 96 115 109 219 101 133 187 117 203 233 83 170 150 42 41 18136% 34% 47% 39% 33% 48% 46% 25% 33% 46% 29% 43% 27% 45% 35% 40% 35% 37% 26% 34% 37%

BE H H I K M s

Chicago

316 84 51 45 127 60 110 145 224 92 117 199 104 212 210 103 148 169 45 42 18436% 43% 41% 35% 30% 30% 44% 33% 34% 42% 25% 46% 24% 47% 31% 50% 31% 41% 28% 35% 37%

E e FH i K M O Q

Orlando

292 62 43 50 128 70 100 122 209 83 114 178 108 184 207 82 162 130 36 36 16733% 32% 35% 39% 30% 35% 40% 28% 31% 37% 25% 41% 24% 41% 31% 40% 34% 32% 22% 30% 34%

H K M O s

Atlanta

274 69 42 50 104 62 91 120 188 86 94 180 89 185 192 79 152 122 47 25 15731% 35% 34% 39% 25% 32% 36% 27% 28% 39% 20% 42% 20% 41% 28% 38% 32% 30% 29% 21% 32%

E e E h I K M O t

Dallas

262 60 46 33 119 63 88 111 187 76 103 159 98 164 176 83 131 131 47 32 14329% 31% 37% 25% 28% 32% 35% 25% 28% 34% 22% 37% 22% 37% 26% 40% 27% 32% 29% 26% 29%

H K M O

Las Vegas




Summary Of Poorly



a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


320 266 18 21936% 41% 14% 35%

C

Chicago

316 250 16 21336% 38% 12% 34%

C

Orlando

292 234 17 21433% 36% 14% 34%

C

Atlanta

274 216 25 20031% 33% 19% 32%

C

Dallas

262 198 16 17729% 30% 13% 28%

C

Las Vegas



16 Sep 2020Table 34Q8_1 Overall, how well do you believe local governments in each of the following top convention cities managed the COVID-19 pandemic so far?

Chicago






160 114 46 63 62 21 10 4 43 47 17 5 2 20 15 4 5 2 49 51 24 3518% 22% 13% 21% 32% 14% 8% 3% 23% 39% 20% 7% 3% 17% 20% 7% 8% 4% 26% 15% 15% 16%

C GH DFGH H LM IKLMO Mp r pr Tuv

Well

411 234 177 156 83 66 56 50 91 49 34 31 30 65 34 33 26 19 85 153 71 10146% 45% 48% 51% 42% 44% 44% 45% 49% 40% 39% 46% 47% 56% 44% 49% 42% 43% 45% 46% 45% 47%

OK

320 176 144 85 53 65 61 57 53 24 35 31 33 32 28 29 31 24 53 128 62 7736% 34% 39% 28% 27% 43% 48% 52% 28% 20% 41% 46% 51% 27% 36% 44% 50% 53% 28% 38% 39% 36%

DE DE DE iJ IJ IJ j n N N s

Poorly

890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 214100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Chicago







160 27 16 17 99 19 33 107 144 15 114 45 115 45 134 25 102 57 40 20 8918% 14% 13% 13% 23% 10% 13% 24% 22% 7% 25% 11% 26% 10% 20% 12% 21% 14% 25% 17% 18%

BCd FG J L N P R

Well

411 102 51 61 187 84 103 224 306 105 213 198 210 201 308 98 208 203 79 60 22246% 52% 40% 48% 44% 42% 41% 51% 46% 47% 46% 46% 48% 45% 46% 47% 43% 49% 49% 50% 45%

c g

OK

320 67 58 50 139 96 115 109 219 101 133 187 117 203 233 83 170 150 42 41 18136% 34% 47% 39% 33% 48% 46% 25% 33% 46% 29% 43% 27% 45% 35% 40% 35% 37% 26% 34% 37%

BE H H I K M s

Poorly

890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 492100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Chicago



a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


160 88 56 12418% 14% 43% 20%

B

Well

411 296 55 28846% 46% 43% 46%

OK

320 266 18 21936% 41% 14% 35%

C

Poorly

890 650 128 631100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Orlando






172 115 57 55 68 23 17 10 31 49 19 7 8 24 19 4 9 2 42 58 31 4219% 22% 16% 18% 34% 15% 13% 9% 17% 41% 23% 11% 12% 21% 24% 5% 15% 4% 22% 17% 20% 20%

c h DFGH IKLMo P PR PR

Well

402 240 162 163 72 71 51 45 107 45 37 26 25 56 26 34 25 20 79 147 72 10445% 46% 44% 54% 36% 47% 40% 41% 57% 38% 43% 40% 38% 48% 34% 51% 41% 46% 42% 44% 46% 49%

Egh JklM

OK

316 169 147 85 58 58 59 55 49 26 29 33 32 36 33 29 27 22 67 127 54 6836% 32% 40% 28% 30% 38% 47% 50% 26% 21% 34% 49% 50% 31% 42% 44% 44% 50% 36% 38% 35% 32%

b d DE DE j IJ IJ J n

Poorly

890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 214100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Orlando







172 24 26 23 99 38 37 97 149 23 117 55 121 50 145 26 116 56 42 22 8919% 12% 20% 18% 23% 19% 15% 22% 22% 10% 25% 13% 27% 11% 22% 12% 24% 14% 26% 19% 18%

b B g J L N P R

Well

402 87 48 61 200 100 104 199 296 106 227 176 216 186 320 78 216 186 75 56 21945% 45% 39% 47% 47% 50% 41% 45% 44% 48% 49% 41% 49% 41% 47% 38% 45% 45% 46% 47% 45%

l n p

OK

316 84 51 45 127 60 110 145 224 92 117 199 104 212 210 103 148 169 45 42 18436% 43% 41% 35% 30% 30% 44% 33% 34% 42% 25% 46% 24% 47% 31% 50% 31% 41% 28% 35% 37%

E e FH i K M O Q

Poorly

890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 492100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Orlando



a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


172 110 42 12619% 17% 33% 20%

B

Well

402 290 69 29245% 45% 54% 46%

OK

316 250 16 21336% 38% 12% 34%

C

Poorly

890 650 128 631100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Las Vegas






206 147 59 94 61 31 10 10 62 49 22 6 8 32 12 9 4 2 50 58 34 6323% 28% 16% 31% 31% 20% 8% 9% 33% 41% 25% 8% 13% 28% 15% 13% 7% 4% 27% 18% 22% 30%

C fGH fGH GH LM kLMO L pQR T T

Well

422 225 198 139 86 70 73 55 79 41 38 37 30 60 44 32 36 25 81 173 82 8747% 43% 54% 46% 43% 46% 58% 50% 42% 34% 44% 56% 45% 52% 57% 48% 59% 56% 43% 52% 52% 41%

B de J J v

OK

262 152 110 70 51 52 44 45 46 29 26 24 27 24 21 26 20 18 57 101 41 6429% 29% 30% 23% 26% 34% 35% 41% 25% 24% 30% 36% 42% 21% 28% 39% 33% 40% 30% 30% 26% 30%

d d DE Ij N N

Poorly

890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 214100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Las Vegas







206 33 25 26 122 41 42 123 171 35 150 56 151 54 180 26 132 74 59 24 10423% 17% 20% 20% 29% 21% 17% 28% 26% 16% 33% 13% 34% 12% 27% 12% 27% 18% 36% 20% 21%

B G J L N P R tU

Well

422 103 54 70 185 94 121 207 312 111 207 215 192 230 319 98 217 205 56 64 24547% 53% 44% 54% 43% 48% 48% 47% 47% 50% 45% 50% 43% 51% 47% 47% 45% 50% 35% 53% 50%

e e m S S

OK

262 60 46 33 119 63 88 111 187 76 103 159 98 164 176 83 131 131 47 32 14329% 31% 37% 25% 28% 32% 35% 25% 28% 34% 22% 37% 22% 37% 26% 40% 27% 32% 29% 26% 29%

H K M O

Poorly

890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 492100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Las Vegas



a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


206 126 59 15123% 19% 46% 24%

B

Well

422 327 53 30347% 50% 41% 48%

OK

262 198 16 17729% 30% 13% 28%

C

Poorly

890 650 128 631100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Atlanta






158 113 45 67 51 25 12 3 43 40 20 8 1 24 11 4 4 2 37 50 28 4318% 22% 12% 22% 26% 16% 10% 3% 23% 33% 24% 13% 1% 21% 14% 6% 7% 4% 20% 15% 18% 20%

C GH fGH H h M LMO MP m pqR

Well

441 265 176 161 89 76 56 60 105 50 43 29 38 56 38 33 27 22 79 175 82 10550% 51% 48% 53% 45% 50% 44% 54% 56% 42% 51% 43% 59% 48% 50% 49% 44% 48% 42% 53% 52% 49%

j j s

OK

292 146 146 75 59 51 59 47 39 30 22 29 26 36 29 30 30 21 71 107 48 6633% 28% 40% 25% 30% 34% 47% 43% 21% 25% 25% 44% 40% 31% 37% 44% 49% 48% 38% 32% 30% 31%

B DEf De IJk Ij k n n

Poorly

890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 214100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Atlanta







158 28 20 15 93 41 23 94 143 15 117 41 121 36 125 32 98 59 51 19 8418% 15% 16% 12% 22% 21% 9% 21% 21% 7% 25% 10% 27% 8% 18% 15% 20% 14% 32% 16% 17%

bd G G J L N r TU

Well

441 106 61 64 204 87 129 225 317 124 230 211 213 228 343 93 220 221 74 65 24150% 54% 49% 49% 48% 44% 51% 51% 47% 56% 50% 49% 48% 51% 51% 45% 46% 54% 46% 54% 49%

i q

OK

292 62 43 50 128 70 100 122 209 83 114 178 108 184 207 82 162 130 36 36 16733% 32% 35% 39% 30% 35% 40% 28% 31% 37% 25% 41% 24% 41% 31% 40% 34% 32% 22% 30% 34%

H K M O s

Poorly

890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 492100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Atlanta



a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


158 84 49 10618% 13% 39% 17%

B

Well

441 332 61 31250% 51% 48% 49%

OK

292 234 17 21433% 36% 14% 34%

C

Poorly

890 650 128 631100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Dallas






158 109 49 64 52 27 9 6 39 38 22 8 4 25 15 5 2 2 44 52 24 3718% 21% 13% 21% 26% 18% 7% 5% 21% 31% 25% 11% 6% 21% 19% 8% 3% 5% 24% 16% 16% 17%

C GH GH GH M LM lMP pQR Qr t

Well

459 267 192 162 95 86 60 55 107 55 45 29 31 55 41 41 31 25 83 185 82 10952% 51% 52% 53% 48% 56% 47% 50% 57% 46% 53% 44% 47% 47% 52% 61% 51% 56% 44% 56% 52% 51%

S

OK

274 149 125 78 50 40 58 49 41 28 19 30 31 37 22 21 28 18 61 95 51 6731% 28% 34% 26% 25% 26% 46% 44% 22% 23% 22% 45% 47% 32% 29% 31% 46% 39% 32% 29% 32% 31%

DEF DEF IJK IJK

Poorly

890 524 366 303 198 153 127 110 187 120 86 66 65 116 78 67 61 45 188 332 157 214100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Dallas







158 22 22 14 99 27 27 104 145 13 121 37 121 37 141 17 102 56 44 29 7518% 11% 18% 11% 23% 14% 11% 24% 22% 6% 26% 9% 27% 8% 21% 8% 21% 14% 27% 24% 15%

BD FG J L N P R U

Well

459 105 61 65 222 109 134 216 336 122 245 213 233 226 342 111 227 232 71 67 25952% 54% 49% 51% 52% 55% 53% 49% 50% 55% 53% 50% 53% 50% 51% 53% 47% 57% 44% 56% 53%

Q

OK

274 69 42 50 104 62 91 120 188 86 94 180 89 185 192 79 152 122 47 25 15731% 35% 34% 39% 25% 32% 36% 27% 28% 39% 20% 42% 20% 41% 28% 38% 32% 30% 29% 21% 32%

E e E h I K M O t

Poorly

890 196 125 129 425 198 251 441 669 221 461 430 442 449 676 207 480 410 162 120 492100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma




Dallas



a typical year




(A) (B) (C) (D)


158 94 43 10118% 14% 34% 16%

B

Well

459 340 60 33052% 52% 47% 52%

OK

274 216 25 20031% 33% 19% 32%

C

Poorly

890 650 128 631100% 100% 100% 100%

Sigma


16 September 2020

Fielding Period: September 14 - 16, 2020INT/WillWeighted To The U.S. General Adult Population - Propensity

TitleTablePage

1 1 Q1A Before the COVID-19 pandemic hit in early March, did you ever attend any in-person trade shows, expos, businessconventions or conferences? Please select all that apply.



4 4 Q1 Before the COVID-19 pandemic hit in early March, approximately how many in-person trade shows, expos, businessconventions or conferences did you attend in a typical year? If less than one a year, please enter ’0’.



7 7 Q2 What would it take for you to feel comfortable returning to an in-person trade show, expo, business convention orconference if they were allowed to take place right now? Please select all that apply.



10 10 Q3 What size trade show, expo, business convention or conference would you feel comfortable attending in person as soon as they are permitted to be held?11 11 Q3 What size trade show, expo, business convention or conference would you feel comfortable attending in person as soon as they are permitted to be held?12 12 Q3 What size trade show, expo, business convention or conference would you feel comfortable attending in person as soon as they are permitted to be held?13 13 Q4_1 When do you foresee flying or driving to another city to attend one of these in-person events again?

Driving14 14 Q4_1 When do you foresee flying or driving to another city to attend one of these in-person events again?



Flying17 17 Q4_2 When do you foresee flying or driving to another city to attend one of these in-person events again?

Flying18 18 Q4_2 When do you foresee flying or driving to another city to attend one of these in-person events again?

Flying19 19 Q6 Do you believe virtual trade shows/expos/business conventions or conferences are better, worse, or equal to in-person trade shows/expos/business

conventions or conferences, overall (e.g., productive, efficient, experience, convenience, benefits)?Virtual trade shows/expos/business conventions or conferences are...

20 20 Q6 Do you believe virtual trade shows/expos/business conventions or conferences are better, worse, or equal to in-person trade shows/expos/businessconventions or conferences, overall (e.g., productive, efficient, experience, convenience, benefits)?Virtual trade shows/expos/business conventions or conferences are...

21 21 Q6 Do you believe virtual trade shows/expos/business conventions or conferences are better, worse, or equal to in-person trade shows/expos/businessconventions or conferences, overall (e.g., productive, efficient, experience, convenience, benefits)?Virtual trade shows/expos/business conventions or conferences are...

22 22 Q7 Which of the following are among the things you miss most about attending in-person trade shows/expos/businessconventions or conferences since the COVID-19 pandemic hit? Please select all that apply.



25 25 Q8 Overall, how well do you believe local governments in each of the following top convention cities managed the COVID-19 pandemic so far?Summary Of Well



28 28 Q8 Overall, how well do you believe local governments in each of the following top convention cities managed the COVID-19 pandemic so far?Summary Of OK



31 31 Q8 Overall, how well do you believe local governments in each of the following top convention cities managed the COVID-19 pandemic so far?Summary Of Poorly


16 September 2020

Fielding Period: September 14 - 16, 2020INT/WillWeighted To The U.S. General Adult Population - Propensity

TitleTablePage


34 34 Q8_1 Overall, how well do you believe local governments in each of the following top convention cities managed the COVID-19 pandemic so far?Chicago



37 37 Q8_2 Overall, how well do you believe local governments in each of the following top convention cities managed the COVID-19 pandemic so far?Orlando



40 40 Q8_3 Overall, how well do you believe local governments in each of the following top convention cities managed the COVID-19 pandemic so far?Las Vegas



43 43 Q8_4 Overall, how well do you believe local governments in each of the following top convention cities managed the COVID-19 pandemic so far?Atlanta



46 46 Q8_5 Overall, how well do you believe local governments in each of the following top convention cities managed the COVID-19 pandemic so far?Dallas



Documents

Page 1 C GH FGH gH H kLMN KLMO M R R R R R TU C gH DFGH H ... · e e m S S OK 262 60 46 33 119 63 88 111 187 76 103 159 98 164 176 83 131 131 47 32 143 29% 31% 37% 25% 28% 32% 35%