PAF Indicators Performance Family Group Comparison Report 2007/8 k to add title

Adults & Older People

Information Produced by Research and Information Section Community, Health and Social Care Directorate Crompton House

A80 – Participation on drug treatment programmes (interface) – The percentage year on year change in the number of problem drug misusers accessing treatment services. (BVPI 198)

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l- <90 90<99.99 100 - - - - -

Low High

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00

Plymouth UAOldham

Sandw ellWalsall

CoventryNorth Tyneside

SalfordRochdale

WolverhamptonNew castle upon Tyne

Bristol UAGateshead

Kingston upon Hull UASheff ield

Darlington UA

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 97.14 103.99Metropolitan 97.67 104.26Family 69.89 104.68SALFORD 97.89 104.43

B11 – Intensive Home Care as a percentage of Intensive Residential Care – The number of households receiving intensive home help/care as a percentage of all adults and older people in residential and nursing care and households receiving intensive home help/care.

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<10 10<16 16<20 20<27 27<45 45<59 59<73 73<100 -

Low High

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Kingston upon Hull UANorth Tyneside

Plymouth UABristol UA

Darlington UAWolverhampton

GatesheadWalsall

RochdaleSandw ellSheff ieldTameside

OldhamCoventry

New castle upon TyneSalford

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 23.60 25.20 26.87 28.07 29.33Metropolitan 26.10 27.40 28.75 29.36 29.33Family 23.70 25.60 27.16 28.14 29.34SALFORD 36.50 33.70 36.68 37.76 39.26

B12 – Cost of Intensive Social Care for Adults and Older People – Average gross weekly expenditure per person on supporting adults and older people in residential and nursing care and providing intensive home care. (BVPI 52)

ll lll llll lll ll0<319 319<342 342<455 455<487 >=487

Low High

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

CoventryBristol UA

GatesheadSandw ell

Plymouth UAWolverhampton

WalsallSalford

New castle upon TyneKingston upon Hull

RochdaleNorth Tyneside

SheffieldDarlington UA

OldhamTameside Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8

England 44.29 478.00 514.73 540.39 559.70Metropolitan 405.92 437.00 481.87 506.11 526.25Family 417.51 438.90 444.94 476.57 530.70SALFORD 421.72 469.00 494.88 534.73 541.98

Group 2 bandings

Note: Darlington, Gateshead, Kingston upon Hull, Newcastle upon Tyne, North Tyneside, Plymouth and Sheffield are Group 1 Authorities

B17 – Unit cost of home care for Adults and Older People – Average gross hourly cost for home help/care.

ll lll llll lll ll0<9.77 9.77<10.48 10.486<13.96 13.96>15.58 >=15.58

Low High

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00

Bristol UAWolverhampton

Plymouth UAWalsall

GatesheadNorth Tyneside

RochdaleNew castle upon Tyne

Sheff ieldTameside

CoventrySalford

OldhamDarlington UA

Sandw ellKingston upon Hull UA

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 12.93 13.59 14.47 14.57 14.50Metropolitan 12.43 12.58 13.82 13.97 14.37Family 14.45 13.60 13.92 14.15 14.35SALFORD 14.86 11.64 11.24 12.07 12.71

Group 2 bandings

Note: Darlington, Gateshead, Kingston upon Hull, Newcastle upon Tyne, North Tyneside, Plymouth and Sheffield are Group 1 Authorities

C28 – Intensive Home Care – Households receiving intensive home care per 1,000 population aged 65 or over. (BVPI 53) – Key Threshold

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<4 4<8 8<12 12<16 16+ - - - -

Low High

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

North TynesideWolverhampton

Bristol UAKingston upon Hull

Plymouth UAWalsall

CoventrySandw ell

Darlington UAGateshead

RochdaleSheff ieldTameside

OldhamNew castle upon Tyne

Salford

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 11.10 11.50 12.19 12.47 12.75Metropolitan 14.50 14.08 15.21 15.11 15.24Family 14.10 14.90 15.62 15.64 15.95SALFORD 25.20 24.00 22.98 22.27 22.93

C29 – Adults with physical disabilities helped to live at home – Adults with physical disabilities helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 18-64.

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<1.7 1.7<3.4 3.4<4.2 4.2<5 5+ - - - -

Low High

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

CoventryPlymouth UA

WolverhamptonBristol UASandw ell

WalsallNew castle upon Tyne

SheffieldRochdale

North TynesideOldham

Darlington UASalford

GatesheadTameside

Kingston upon Hull

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 4.20 4.20 4.47 4.54 4.68Metropolitan 4.90 4.40 4.62 4.48 4.48Family 5.40 4.90 4.64 5.15 5.30SALFORD 4.20 11.80 8.00 9.49 6.65

C30 – Adults with learning disabilities helped to live at home – Adults with learning disabilities helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 18-64.

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<1 1<2 2<2.5 2.5<3 3+ - - - -

Low High

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Bristol UASandw ell

Wolverhampton

Kingston upon Hull UASheff ield

CoventryPlymouth UA

North Tyneside

GatesheadWalsall

Rochdale

New castle upon TyneDarlington UA

SalfordOldham

Tameside

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 2.70 2.70 2.79 2.87 2.95Metropolitan 3.00 3.10 3.21 3.29 3.36Family 3.30 3.10 3.19 3.23 3.25SALFORD 4.10 4.30 4.37 4.41 4.08

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<0.3 0.3<1.3 1.3<1.8 1.8<2.3 2.3+ - - - -

Low High

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0

North TynesideKingston upon Hull UA

GatesheadNew castle upon Tyne

Sandw ellWolverhampton

SalfordCoventry

SheffieldBristol UA

WalsallDarlington UA

Plymouth UARochdale

TamesideOldham

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 3.40 3.70 3.80 4.28 4.54Metropolitan 3.80 3.80 3.72 4.20 4.17Family 3.70 4.10 4.22 5.06 5.40SALFORD 1.80 2.50 2.63 4.84 3.95

C31 – Adults with mental health problems helped to live at home – Adults with mental health problems helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 18-64.

C32 – Older people helped to live at home – Older people helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 65 or over. (BVPI 54)

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<55 55<80 80<90 90<100 100+ - - - -

Low High

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Plymouth UACoventry

WalsallOldham

Sandw ellWolverhampton

Darlington UARochdaleSheffield

Bristol UANew castle upon Tyne

North TynesideTameside

SalfordKingston upon Hull UA

Gateshead

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 3.40 3.70 80.94 80.13 81.79Metropolitan 3.80 3.80 91.65 88.57 87.03Family 3.70 4.10 88.66 90.83 89.98SALFORD 1.80 2.50 119.98 120.77 105.78

C51 – Direct payments – Adults and Older People receiving direct payments at 31st March per 100,000 population aged 18 or over (age standardised). – (BVPI 201) - Key Threshold

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<15 15<30 30<90 90<150 150+ - - - -

Low High

0 50 100 150 200 250

Oldham

Kingston upon Hull UA

Bristol UA

Tameside

Rochdale

Walsall

Plymouth UA

Gateshead

Wolverhampton

Sandw ell

Darlington UA

New castle upon Tyne

North Tyneside

Coventry

Sheffield

Salford

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 36.30 56.70 81.36 103.10 140.68Metropolitan 33.20 53.20 77.00 98.30 130.91Family 35.10 53.40 84.79 99.72 126.68SALFORD 38.40 68.00 108.03 152.16 203.17

C62 – Services for Carers – The number of carers receiving a specific carer’s service as a percentage of clients receiving community based services.

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<3 3<6 6<9 9<12 12+

Low High

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

Plymouth UAOldham

RochdaleSandw ell

WalsallSheff ieldCoventry

Kingston upon HullGateshead

Darlington UANorth TynesideWolverhampton

Bristol UATameside

New castle upon TyneSalford

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 9.00 9.51 11.65 13.60Metropolitan 6.90 8.12 10.89 13.46Family 6.00 8.29 9.96 13.03SALFORD 2.50 7.53 9.30 19.26

C72 – Admissions of supported residents aged 65 or over to residential/nursing care (KT) – The number of Older people aged 65 or over admitted on a permanent basis in the year to residential or nursing care

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - - - - <90 90<100 100<110 110<120 120+

Low High

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Kingston upon Hull UATameside

OldhamRochdale

New castle upon TyneDarlington UA

GatesheadWalsall

Bristol UASalford

Sheff ieldWolverhamptonNorth Tyneside

Plymouth UASandw ellCoventry Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8

England 97.60 90.50 85.96 79.91 74.48Metropolitan 108.80 100.80 93.11 91.17 81.51Family 112.30 103.30 97.07 94.56 85.36SALFORD 112.30 104.50 98.70 114.61 84.37

C73 – Admissions of supported residents aged 18-64 to residential/nursing care - Adults aged 18-64 admitted on a permanent basis in the year to residential or nursing care per 10,000 population aged 18-64.

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - - - - <1.5 1.5<2.5 2.5<3.5 3.5<4.5 4.5+

Low High

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

RochdaleWalsall

New castle upon TynePlymouth UA

Bristol UASheffield

Darlington UAWolverhampton

SalfordNorth Tyneside

Kingston upon Hull UASandw ellCoventryTameside

GatesheadOldham Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8

England 1.96 1.75 1.51Metropolitan 1.78 1.78 1.56Family 2.24 1.89 1.74SALFORD 2.58 1.62 1.60

D37 – Availability of single rooms – The percentage of single adults and older people going into permanent residential and nursing care who were allocated single rooms.

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<80 80<85 85<90 90<95 95<100 - - - -

Low High

91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101

WalsallCoventry

Bristol UA

SalfordSandw ellSheff ield

WolverhamptonPlymouth UA

TamesideKingston upon Hull UA

RochdaleNew castle upon Tyne

Darlington UA

North TynesideGateshead

Oldham

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 92.50 94.10 95.27 96.24 97.27Metropolitan 93.90 94.90 95.73 96.98 97.35Family 97.20 96.50 97.44 97.91 98.30SALFORD 92.50 94.00 96.06 95.70 96.08

D39 – Percentage of people receiving a statement of their needs and how they will be met – The percentage of adults and older people receiving a statement of their needs and how they will be met. (BVPI 58)

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<80 80<90.85 90.85<96 96<100 100 - - - -

Low High

86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102

Kingston upon Hull UADarlington UA

North TynesideSandw ellSheff ieldTamesideCoventry

New castle upon TyneBristol UARochdale

OldhamWolverhampton

Plymouth UAWalsallSalford

Gateshead

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 88.60 91.10 94.11 96.36 97.45Metropolitan 91.80 92.70 95.02 96.41 97.18Family 88.90 89.30 95.57 96.12 97.32SALFORD 99.60 99.80 99.89 99.81 99.88

D40 – Clients receiving a review – Adult and older clients receiving a review as a percentage of those receiving a service.

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<55 55<65 65<75 75+ - - - - -

Low High

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

WolverhamptonBristol UA

Plymouth UAKingston upon Hull

New castle upon TyneRochdale

GatesheadCoventryTameside

WalsallSalford

SheffieldOldham

Sandw ellNorth Tyneside

Darlington UA

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 58.80 63.10 66.43 70.83 75.73Metropolitan 59.10 59.70 62.33 65.35 72.37Family 60.20 60.80 62.84 67.27 72.00SALFORD 38.00 34.50 66.19 66.00 72.85

D41 – Delayed Transfers of Care – The number of delayed transfers of care per 100,000 population aged 65 or over

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - - - - 0<20.12 20.12<39.78 39.78<73.28 73.28<106.48 106.48+

Low High

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

TamesideCoventry

Plymouth UAKingston upon Hull UA

WolverhamptonSandw ellSheffield

North TynesideWalsallSalford

GatesheadRochdaleBristol UA

New castle upon TyneOldham

Darlington UA Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 46.20 33.30 29.86 29.25 27.02Metropolitan 40.60 29.70 29.11 24.94 24.94Family 44.20 27.50 23.88 25.32 28.56SALFORD 30.40 15.30 14.05 16.60 25.00

D54 – % of items of equipment delivered within 7 working days – Percentage of items of equipment and adaptations delivered within 7 working days (BVPI 56) – Key Threshold

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<55 55<65 65<75 75<85 85<=100 - - - -

Low High

80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100

WalsallSandw ellBristol UA

Kingston upon Hull UAPlymouth UA

OldhamSheffield

WolverhamptonTameside

GatesheadDarlington UA

North TynesideSalford

RochdaleCoventry

New castle upon Tyne

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 77.00 81.70 86.52 89.51 91.22Metropolitan 81.40 85.40 87.97 89.47 92.21Family 78.40 82.60 86.23 88.54 92.24SALFORD 87.70 91.30 94.83 97.32 96.11

D55 – Acceptable waiting times for 1 average of (I) the percentage where the time from first contact to beginning of assessment is less than or equal to 48 hours, and (ii) the percentage where the time from first contact to completion of assessment is less than or equal to four weeks. (BVPI 195) – Key Threshold

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<70 70<80 80<85 85<90 90<=100

Low High

70 75 80 85 90 95 100

GatesheadNorth Tyneside

Sheff ieldOldham

WolverhamptonPlymouth UA

New castle upon TyneKingston upon Hull UA

SalfordWalsall

CoventryBristol UARochdaleSandw ell

Darlington UATameside

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 61.50 71.70 78.75 84.16 87.45Metropolitan 62.80 67.10 75.77 81.16 84.86Family 60.40 69.90 79.25 83.07 86.59SALFORD 75.00 87.00 87.37 86.75 86.06

D56 – Acceptable waiting times for care packages – For new older clients, the percentage for whom the time from completion of assessment to provision of all services in the care package is less than or equal to 4 weeks. (BVPI 196) – Key Threshold

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<70 70<80 80<85 85<90 90<=100

Low High

70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Sheffield

North Tyneside

Bristol UA

Coventry

Wolverhampton

Gateshead

Plymouth UA

Salford

Kingston upon Hull UA

Darlington UA

Walsall

Sandw ell

Oldham

New castle upon Tyne

Rochdale

Tameside

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 81.40 84.00 87.27 89.29 90.94Metropolitan 83.10 84.60 88.06 88.09 89.90Family 79.50 82.50 87.02 88.29 90.20SALFORD 76.50 85.40 90.07 90.17 90.10

D83 – Improvement to quality of life from equipment/minor adaptations – For older service users all respondents to Q10 in the 2008 survey answering “it has

made it much better” or “it has made it a little better”

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - <75 75-82 >=82 - - - - -

89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100

CoventryWalsall

SheffieldSalford

TamesideNorth Tyneside

OldhamNew castle upon Tyne

GatesheadPlymouth UA

Sandw ellBristol UA

RochdaleKingston upon Hull UA

WolverhamptonDarlington UA

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 95.17Metropolitan 94.66Family 95.46SALFORD 94.51

MRD75 – Practice learning – The number of assessed social work practice learning days per whole time equivalent social worker.

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0 (>0)<5 5<11 11<17 17+ - - - -

Low High

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0

TamesideNew castle upon Tyne

GatesheadOldham

RochdaleSheffield

WalsallNorth Tyneside

WolverhamptonSalford

Bristol UADarlington UA

Plymouth UASandw ell

CoventryKingston upon Hull UA

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 15.95 17.72Metropolitan 15.97 17.59Family 17.88 18.40SALFORD 18.03 19.29

E47 – Ethnicity of older people receiving assessment – The percentage of older service users receiving an assessment or review that are from minority ethnic groups, divided by the percentage of older people in the local population that are from minority ethnic groups.

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - 0<1 1<2 - - - - 2+ -

Low High

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Kingston upon Hull UA

Darlington UA

Sheffield

New castle upon Tyne

Wolverhampton

Plymouth UA

Rochdale

Coventry

North Tyneside

Walsall

Salford

Sandw ell

Oldham

Tameside

Bristol UA

Gateshead

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.35Metropolitan 1.00 1.10 1.12 1.34 1.35Family 0.80 0.90 1.09 1.13 1.25SALFORD 1.10 0.70 0.89 0.93 1.27

E48 – Ethnicity of older people receiving services following an assessment – The percentage of older service users receiving services following an assessment or review that are from a minority ethnic group, divided by the percentage of older service users assessed or reviewed that are from a minority ethnic group.

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l- <0.9 0.9<1.1 - - - - 1.1+

Low High

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20

Plymouth UA

New castle upon Tyne

Tameside

Wolverhampton

Gateshead

North Tyneside

Salford

Sandw ell

Rochdale

Walsall

Kingston upon Hull UA

Bristol UA

Sheff ield

Oldham

Coventry

Darlington UA

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Metropolitan 0.90 1.00 0.87 0.96 0.96Family 1.10 1.10 0.88 0.96 0.97SALFORD 1.00 0.90 0.73 0.91 0.96

Darlington did not supply data for 3rd year

E82 – Assessments of adults and older people leading to provision of service – The percentage of assessments which lead to service being provided

l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - <58 58<63 63<68 68<77 77<82 82<87 87+ -

Low High

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

New castle upon TyneOldham

WolverhamptonPlymouth UA

Gateshead

CoventryBristol UA

Darlington UASheffield

North TynesideTameside

Kingston upon Hull UASalford

Rochdale

Sandw ellWalsall

Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 69.57 71.6 75.22Metropolitan 66.06 70.90 73.39Family 69.35 70.61 76.25SALFORD 78.4 80.38 82.67