Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
Center for Technology in Learning
SRI International
NSF Showcase 2014 SIGCSE Conference
Atlanta, GA
Eric Snow & Marie Bienkowski Principal Investigators
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
How can we improve CS teaching, learning, and
adoption through evidence-centered assessment?
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
PACT Project Goals I
§ Develop valid and reliable assessments of computational thinking practices
§ Aid in the adoption of high school computer science courses through assessments that stakeholders recognize as useful boundary objects
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
PACT Project Goals II
§ Create design patterns for computational thinking practices that can be used to develop new assessments as curriculum evolves
§ Create and field test assessments for Exploring Computer Science (ECS)
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
Evidence-Centered Assessment Design (ECD)
§ What complex of knowledge, skills, or other attributes should be assessed?
§ What behaviors or performances should reveal those constructs?
§ What tasks or situations should elicit those behaviors?
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
§ From Mislevy & Riconscente, 2006
Assessment Delivery Students interact with tasks, performances evaluated, feedback created. Four-process delivery architecture.
Assessment Implementation
Conceptual Assessment Framework
Domain Modeling
Domain Analysis What is important about this domain? What work and situations are central in this domain? What KRs are central to this domain?
How do we represent key aspects of the domain in terms of assessment argument. Conceptualization.
Design structures: Student, evidence, and task models. Generativity.
Manufacturing “nuts & bolts”: authoring tasks, automated scoring details, statistical models. Reusability.
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
Computational Thinking Practices
Non-Cognitive
Skills
Inquiry Skills
CS Concepts
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
Computational Thinking Practices
Example CS Concepts
Example Inquiry Skills
Example Non-Cognitive Skills
Algorithms Evaluate Communication
Programming Explore Teamwork/collaboration
Recursion Analyze Leadership
Abstraction Explain Self-efficacy
Debugging / Testing Elaborate Persistence
Variables Model Organization
Integration
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
PACT Project Accomplishments I
§ Aligned Exploring Computer Science lesson objectives to CSTA, NETS, Common Core, and state science and CTE standards
§ Defined computational thinking practices (CTP) and focal knowledge, skills, and abilities (FKSAs) that constitute them
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
PACT Project Accomplishments II
§ Developed and applied CTP design patterns to guide the development of assessments for ECS
§ Field testing assessments for ECS Units 1-4, and a summative assessment
§ Conducting think aloud interviews with ECS students
© 2013 SRI Interna/onal -‐ Company Confiden/al and Proprietary Informa/on
Menlo Park Headquarters SRI International 333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park, CA 94025-3493 650.859.2000 Washington, D.C.
SRI International 1100 Wilson Blvd., Suite 2800 Arlington, VA 22209-3915 703.524.2053 Addi$onal U.S. and interna$onal loca$ons www.sri.com
Thank You! © 2012 Principled Assessment of Computational Thinking (PACT). Produced by the Center for Technology in Learning at SRI International with support from the National Science Foundation under contract numbers, CNS-1132232 and CNS-1240625 and CNS-0943507 to the University of Oregon. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.