24
Co-supervisor Ing. Roberto Bertacin Supervisor Prof. Ing. Fabrizio Ponti Graduate Filippo Facciani Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models

DocumentP1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  1. 1. Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models Graduate Filippo FaccianiSupervisor Prof. Ing. Fabrizio Ponti Co-supervisor Ing. Roberto Bertacin
  2. 2. 1. Introduction: Solid Rocket Motors (SRM) Solid Rocket Motor: Propulsion system based on the generation of thrust from the conversion of Enthalpic Energy to Kinetic EnergyIgniterGrainComponents: Igniter Propellant Grane Case Thermic Protection NozzleCase and Thermal Protections = is specifically related to the Nozzle and gives reason of its performance10/10/2012NozzleStudy, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models2
  3. 3. 1. Introduction: Internal BalisticInternal Balistic: Subject act to study the development of the ducted flow internal to the SRM Combustion Chamber (CC) CC Gas Mixture: Inert filling gasesMass Addition: Combustion hot gases Ablation gases Igniter gasesMass Subtraction: Gases leaving the nozzleGeometric Parameters: CC Volume 10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models3
  4. 4. 1. Introduction: Internal Balistic Phases The operative life of an SRM can be devided in: Ignition transient Quasi steady state Tail off transient Quasi Steady State: Igniter is off Ablation of Thermic Protections is negligible Influencing Parameters: Combustion gases hot flow Nozzle flow = Courtesy of Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Solid Rocket Motors Internal Ballistics, Enrico Cavallini Combustion Ratio: = + = = The Combustion Surface development in time determines the Combustion Gases Mass Flow10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models4
  5. 5. 2. Scope: Deisgn and Realization of a Combustion Simulator Scopo:Realize an SRM Combustion Simulator able to break through the current limitsKey Parameters: CC Pressure Axial Velocity Combustion SurfaceFluid dynamic GeometricStato dellarte: Balistic Models 0-D: parameters are averaged in space and function of time 1-D Stationary: parameters are function of the axial position only 1-D non-Stationary: parameters are function of both the axial position and timeCombustion Surface Regression Models Analytic Based on Simmetry or Periodicity Isotropic Current Limits: Isotropy forbids the use of anisotropic inputs from sofisticaded Balistic ModelsSolution: develop of two cross-linked models, and Internal Balistic Model and a Regression one, interdependent and able to work with Anisotropic geometries 10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models5
  6. 6. 3. Simulator Map Input/Output: Burn Rate Mesh SuperficialeGrain Configuration from CAD modellingSurface Mesh Generation Amplification Factors Combustion Chamber Fluid DynamicssTime StepBurn Rate DistributionGrain Surface RegressionBallistic Models 0-D + 1-DSurface Remeshing ProceduresIgniter Nozzle DynamicsStability ControlGraphical VisualizationThermal Protections Updated Surface Mesh10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models6
  7. 7. 3. 0-D Unsteady Balistic Model Use: L ratios > geometries where can be neglectedIpothesis: Fluid dynamic parameters are function of time only Ideal gasses Heat flux through the propellant grain is negligible No chemical reactions within the control volume Inviscid Fluid Subsonic Flux = + Continuity Equation Energy Equation10/10/2012 1 = + + + 2 = + + + 2Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models7
  8. 8. 3. 0-D Balistic Model: Inputs From the Regression Model: = , = = is calculated through analysis of the intersection between the radius of the Combustion Surface and the Case profile10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models8
  9. 9. 3. 0-D Balistic Model: Application to BARIAs initial Geometry:Analytical Regression:Balistic Prediction: Phase of Interest: Quasi-Steady-State Good Match Tail Off: discrepancy due to the Nozzle Physical Model. Such a model just describes sinic conditions. Qualitative Trend: optimal match with the expected trend .10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models9
  10. 10. 3. 0-D Balistic Model: Zefiro 9 Data Provided by AVIO (Sponsor): Igniter properties () trend (experimental) p() trend (experimental) HUMP e Scale Factor corrective factors10/10/2012Dati Found in Literature Therma Protection CharacteristicsData Calculated from the Mesh every section, in order to calculate intersections with the Case.Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models10
  11. 11. 3. 0-D Balistic Model: Zefiro 9 Geometry: Overall results satisfactory Considerations: the simulation was carried on using an isotropic approach. Therefore, anisotropies in the cobustion velocity direction have been considered using an HUMP factor Errore ~ 4% Two deviations from the reference curve:Regression:10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models11
  12. 12. 3. 0-D Balistic Model: Zefiro 9 Geometry:Error due to remeshingRegression:10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models12
  13. 13. 3. 0-D Balistic Model: Zefiro 9 Geometry: Deviation in the final part of the Steaty State phase due to the lack of knowledge about the Thermal ProtectionsRegression:10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models13
  14. 14. 4. 1-D Non-Stationary Balistic Model Use:geometries where can not be neglected H ratios < Ip: Properties of the gas mixture are uniform in a given motor section Velocity components normals to the motor axis are neglectable Inviscid ideal fluids The only thermic flux is through exposed PT surfaces No chemical reactions inside the Control Volume Subsonic flux No abrupt discontinuities in combustion chamber geometryContinuity Equation Momentum Equation( ) ( ) + = + + 3 ( ) [(2 + ) ] + = + =1Energy Equation10/10/2012( ) [ + ] + = + Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models14
  15. 15. 4. 1-D Balistic Model: Inputs From the Triangular Mesh: To calculate the mean radius the sart shape is approximated to the circonference of equivalent area. When the Case surface is exposed, will be equivalent to the Case radius will be calculated the same way as per the 0-D case is found by redistributing on the calculation nodes of 1/3 of the triangular elements adjacent to every vertex assigned to every specific node10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models15
  16. 16. 4. 1-D Balistic Model: Cilindrical Geometry Geometry: Reference curve: results from the 0-D model Analytic regression Thermic Protection Small size motors Ablation is Short combustion time neglegible C Qualitative trend in agreement with Expectations 10/10/2012Quantitative values converging to the 0-D model ones for = 0.01LStudy, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models16
  17. 17. 4. 1-D Balistic Model: Star-Aft Geometry Reference values: results from the 0-D model Inputs: geometry, nozzle throat diameter evolution in time. The match between the 1-D and the 0-D model is not good.10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models17
  18. 18. 4. 1-D Balistic Model: Star-Aft Geometry Complexive trend: the blue line trend agrees with the one of a cilindric geometry. Cause: the star-shaped section are reconducted to geometric shapes with equivalent area10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models18
  19. 19. 4. 1-D Balistic Model: Star-Aft Geometry Complexive trend: the blue line trend agrees with the one of a cilindric geometry. Cause: the star-shaped section are reconducted to geometric shapes with equivalent area Use of circular sections determines an underestimation of in the first part of the Quasi Steady State, an overextimation in the second one.10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models19
  20. 20. 4. 1-D Balistic Model: Star-Aft Geometry Effect of the remeshing: 1-D response is delayed compared to the 0-D Late and incomplete damping10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models20
  21. 21. 4. 1-D Balistic Model: Star-Aft Geometry Effect of the remeshing: 1-D response is delayed compared to the 0-D Late and incomplete damping Cause: the damping factor is artificial and embedded withing the MacCormack integration method.The artificial viscosity is triggered by the pressure gradient10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models21
  22. 22. 4. 1-D Balistic Model: Star-Aft Geometry Effect of the remeshing: 1-D response is delayed compared to the 0-D Late and incomplete damping Cause: the damping factor is artificial and embedded withing the MacCormack integration method.The artificial viscosity is triggered by the pressure gradient The damping factor is not reacting to the geometric perturbations, but only to the pressure gradients induced by it. When these gradiants become low again, the damping ends indipendently from the permanence of geometric stimuli. 10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models22
  23. 23. 5. Conclusions and Future Developments 0-D model: Results are generally satisfactory Influence of remeshing is localised Solutions: Improve Remeshing techniques Higher Triangular Mesh density Filtering of the numeric noise introduced by the geometric parameters.1-D non-Stationary Model: Good results with analytic geometries Results are not good with complex geometries due to the interface and the dynamic behaviour. Solutions: 1. Develop of algorithms to reorder the sections point cloud: this will allow to avoid errors introduced by evaluating geometric parameters using equivalent circular shapes. 2. Modify the Damping term in order to have it triggered directly from the geometric perturbations introduced by the remeshing10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models23
  24. 24. 5. Conclusions and Future Developments Observations: The 1-D non-stationary model highlighted unexpected consequences of using the Anisotropic Regression Model: the effect of the geometric noise on the model were not expected, nor met in literature. They can be bypassed developing an hybrid model, mixin the 0-D and a 1-D Stationary model. This model will get advantage form the 0-D fast response and the capability of the 1-D model to calculate axial distribution along the motor axis for the relevant parameters. At every iteration, the results from the 0-D model will initialised the 1-D stationary model. 0-D Model1-D Stationary Model distributionsThis will allow to limit the remeshin effects while still being able to achieve distributions for the fluid dynamic quantities of interest and, therefore, of the combustion ratio10/10/2012Study, Development and Application of Solid Rocket Balistic Models24