Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs and standardmodules of coherent configurations
Akihide Hanaki
Shinshu University
June 2, 2014, Villanova University.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 1 / 22
1 Motivation and definition
2 Adjacency algebras
3 Standard modules
4 Characteristic 3, 5, and 7 for 2-(15, 3, 1)-designs
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 2 / 22
Motivation and definition
Let C be an incidence matrix of a combinatorial design.
The p-ranks, the ranks of matrices in characteristic p > 0, of designswith same parameters are not constant, in general.
We want to know what is p-ranks from a view point of representationtheory.
For 80 nonisomorphic 2-(15, 3, 1)-designs, the 2-ranks of incidencematrices are 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15.
We will focus on the 2-(15, 3, 1)-designs and p = 2.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 3 / 22
Motivation and definition
A combinatorial design is said to be quasi-symmetric if there areintegers a and b (a > b) such that two blocks are incident with eithera or b points.
For example, 2-(v, `, 1)-designs are quasi-symmetric for a = 1 andb = 0.
By a quasi-symmetric design, we can construct a coherentconfiguration of type (2, 2; 3).
Let (P,B) be a quasi-symmetric design, where P is the set of pointsand B is the set of blocks.
For b, b′ ∈ B, b 6= b′, we can see that |b ∩ b′| = a or b.
We can define a graph with point set B and b is adjacent to b′ iff|b ∩ b′| = a.
Then the graph is strongly regular.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 4 / 22
Motivation and definition
Now we can define a coherent configuration (X,S) of type (2, 2; 3).
complete graph quasi-symmetric designrelations : s1, s3 relations : s6, s7
tquasi-symmetric design strongly regular graphrelations : s8, s9 relations : s2, s4, s5
Put X = X1 ∪X2, X1 = P , and X2 = B.
The configuration has two fibers X1 and X2.
Put S11 = {s1, s3}, S12 = {s6, s7}, S21 = {s8, s9}, andS22 = {s2, s4, s5}.We denote by σi the adjacency matrix of si.
Then FS =⊕9
i=1 Fσi ⊂ MatX(F ) is the adjacency algebra of(X,S) over a field F .
We will consider representations of FS.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 5 / 22
Motivation and definition
The parameters of a 2-(v, `, 1)-design and strongly regular graphdefined by the design are :
r =v − 1
`− 1,
b =v(v − 1)
`(`− 1),
n = b,
k = `
(v − 1
`− 1− 1
),
a =v − 1
`− 1− 2 + (`− 1)2,
c = `2.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 6 / 22
Motivation and definition
We can compute the table of multiplications :
σ1 σ3 σ6 σ7
σ1 σ1 σ3 σ6 σ7σ3 σ3 (v − 1)σ1 (`− 1)σ6 (v − `)σ6
+(v − 2)σ3 +`σ7 +(v − `− 1)σ7
σ8 σ8 (`− 1)σ8 `σ2+`σ9 +σ4 (`− 1)σ4
+`σ5σ9 (v − `)σ8 (v − `)σ2
σ9 +(v − `− 1)σ9 (`− 1)σ4 +(v − 2`+ 1)σ4+`σ5 +(v − 2`)σ5
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 7 / 22
Motivation and definition
σ2 σ4 σ5 σ8 σ9
σ2 σ2 σ4 σ5 σ8 σ9σ4 kσ2 (r − 1)σ8 (k − r + 1)σ8
σ4 +aσ4 (k − a− 1)σ4 +`σ9 +(k − `)σ9+`2σ5 +(k − `2)σ5
σ5 (b− k − 1)σ2 (b− k − 1)σ8(k − a− 1)σ4 +(b + a− 2k)σ4 (r − `)σ9 +(b− r − k + `− 1)σ9
σ5 +(k − `2)σ5 +(b− 2k − 2 + `2)σ5
σ6 σ6 (r − 1)σ6 rσ1+`σ7 (r − `)σ7 +σ3 (r − 1)σ3
σ7 (k − r + 1)σ6 (b− k − 1)σ6 (b− r)σ1σ7 +(k − `)σ7 +(b− r − k + `− 1)σ7 (r − 1)σ3 +(b− 2r + 1)σ3
We remark that the coefficients are polynomial of v, `, k, a, r, and b.
Lemma 1.1
If ` and r = (v − 1)/(`− 1) are odd, then v, a, and b are odd and k iseven.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 8 / 22
Motivation and definition
Theorem 1.2
Let F be a field of characteristic 2. Let A be the adjacency algebra of acoherent configuration defined by a 2-(15, 3, 1)-design over F . Supposethat ` and r = (v − 1)/(`− 1) are odd. Then the adjacency algebra of acoherent configuration defined by a 2-(v, `, 1)-design over F is isomorphicto A.
Let FX be the standard module of (X,S). Namely, FX is a rightFS-module defined by a natural action of FS ⊂ MatX(F ).
We will determine the structure of adjacency algebras and standardmodules of coherent configuration defined by 2-(v, `, 1)-designs suchthat ` and r are odd.
Also we will consider what is 2-ranks of the designs.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 9 / 22
Adjacency algebras
Let F be a field of characteristic 2.
Let (X,S) be a coherent configuration defined by a 2-(v, `, 1)-design.
Suppose that ` and r = (v − 1)/(`− 1) are odd.
The modular character table of FS is :
s1 s3 s2 s4 s5 multiplicity
A 1 0 1 0 0 1B 1 1 0 0 0 v − 1C 0 0 1 1 0 b− 1
We will see that A, B, and C are simple FS-modules. Remark thatdimA = 2 and dimB = dimC = 1.
The multiplicity is the cardinality of the simple module in FX assimple components.
Note that A is in a simple block B1 ∼= Mat2(F ) and B and C are inthe same block B2.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 10 / 22
Adjacency algebras
Let Q be the following quiver
x•α //
•yβ
oo
and consider the quiver algebra FQ.
Theorem 2.1
Let F be a field of characteristic 2. Let (X,S) be a coherent configurationdefined by a 2-(v, `, 1)-design. Suppose that ` and r = (v − 1)/(`− 1) areodd. Then
FS ∼= Mat2(F )⊕ FQ/(αβ).
The projective covers of simple modules are :
P (A) = [A], P (B) =
[BC
], P (C) =
CBC
.A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 11 / 22
Standard modules
Again, let F be a field of characteristic 2 and let (X,S) be a coherentconfiguration defined by a 2-(v, `, 1)-design with odd ` and r.
SoFS ∼= Mat2(F )⊕ FQ/(αβ).
Easily, we can see that the algebra has finite representation type.Namely there are finitely many isomorphism classes ofindecomposable FS-modules.
[A] ,[C],
[CB
],
CBC
, [B],
[BC
].
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 12 / 22
Standard modules
Since A has multiplicity one, we can write
FX ∼= [A]⊕ g1 [C]⊕ g2[CB
]⊕ g3
CBC
⊕ h1 [ B ]⊕ h2
[BC
].
By the multiplicities, we have
g1 + g2 + 2g3 + h2 = b− 1,
g2 + g3 + h1 + h2 = v − 1.
Since the standard module is self-contragredient, we have
g2 = h2.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 13 / 22
Standard modules
Since β in the quiver goes to σ7 and βα goes to σ5, we puts = rank(σ7) and t = rank(σ5).
We can see that rank(σ7) = g2 + g3 and rank(σ5) = g3.
We have
(g1, g2, g3, h1, h2) = (b− 2s− 1, s− t, t, v − 2s+ t− 1, s− t).
So the parameters s and t determine the structure of standardmodule FX.
Remark that the usual 2-rank of the design is rank(σ6) and
rank(σ6) = 1 + rank(σ7) = 1 + s.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 14 / 22
Standard modules
Theorem 3.1
Let F be a field of characteristic 2. Let (X,S) be a coherent configurationdefined by a 2-(v, `, 1)-design. Suppose that ` and r = (v − 1)/(`− 1) areodd. Put s = rank(σ7) and t = rank(σ5). Then
FX ∼= [A]⊕ g1 [C]⊕ g2[CB
]⊕ g3
CBC
⊕ h1 [ B ]⊕ h2
[BC
],
where (g1, g2, g3, h1, h2) = (b− 2s− 1, s− t, t, v − 2s+ t− 1, s− t).
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 15 / 22
Standard modules
Example 3.2
For 80 nonisomorphic 2-(15, 3, 1)-designs, we have following parameters(by computation) :
] rank(σ7) rank(σ5) g1 g2 g3 h1 h2 rank(σ6)
1 10 6 14 4 6 0 4 111 11 8 12 3 8 0 3 125 12 10 10 2 10 0 2 1315 13 12 8 1 12 0 1 1458 14 14 6 0 14 0 0 15
I do not know why h1 = 0. If this is true in general, then thestructure is determined only by the 2-rank of the design.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 16 / 22
Standard modules
Remark 3.3
All 80 strongly-regular graphs obtained by 2-(15, 3, 1)-designs arenonisomorphic to each other. The structures of standard modules of thegraphs are
(FX2)FS22∼= [A]⊕ (g1 + g2 + h2) [C]⊕ g3
[CC
].
This is just obtained by
FX ∼= [A]⊕ g1 [C]⊕ g2[CB
]⊕ g3
CBC
⊕ h1 [ B ]⊕ h2
[BC
].
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 17 / 22
Standard modules
Example 3.4
In [The CRC Handbook of Combinatorial Designs], we can find a list ofdesigns with odd ` and r :
No. v b r ` ]
14 15 35 7 3 80
29 19 57 9 3 ≥ 1.1× 109
57 45 99 11 5 ≥ 16
86 27 117 13 3 ≥ 1011
114 31 155 15 3 ≥ 6× 1016
120 61 183 15 5 ≥ 10
129 91 195 15 7 ≥ 2
I want to compute p-ranks of them. But I do not have data.
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 18 / 22
Characteristic 3, 5, and 7 for 2-(15, 3, 1)-designs
Theorem 4.1
Let F be a field of characteristic 3. There are three simple FS-modules A,B, and C with dimF A = dimF B = dimF C = 1. The Loewy series ofthe projective covers of simple FS-modules are
P (A) =
AB CA
, P (B) =
[BA
], P (C) =
CAC
and the structures of standard FS-modules are
FX ∼=
AB CA
⊕ 13
CAC
⊕ 7 [C]
for all 80 designs. (By computation)
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 19 / 22
Characteristic 3, 5, and 7 for 2-(15, 3, 1)-designs
Theorem 4.2
Let F be a field of characteristic 5. There are two simple FS-modules Aand B with dimF A = 2 and dimF B = 1. The Loewy series of theprojective covers of simple FS-modules are
P (A) =
[AA
], P (B) = [B]
and the structure of the standard FS-module is
FX ∼=[AA
]⊕ 13 [A]⊕ 20 [B] .
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 20 / 22
Characteristic 3, 5, and 7 for 2-(15, 3, 1)-designs
Theorem 4.3
Let F be a field of characteristic 7. There are three simple FS-modules A,B, and C with dimF A = dimF B = 1 and dimF C = 2. The Loewy seriesof the projective covers of simple FS-modules are
P (A) =
[AB
], P (B) =
BAB
, P (C) = [C]
and the structure of the standard FS-module is
FX ∼=
BAB
⊕ 19 [B]⊕ 14 [C] .
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 21 / 22
Thank you very much !
A. Hanaki (Shinshu Univ.) p-Ranks of quasi-symmetric designs June 2, 2014 22 / 22