Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
P R E M I A 2 . 0
A NEW APPROACH TO DELIVERING DIVERSIFICATION & ALPHA
La Française Investment Solutions
Luc Dumontier: Head of Factor Investing
A P R I L 2 7 , 2 0 1 7
FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL FOR USE OF RECIPIENT ONLY. ONLY FOR PROFESSIONAL CLIENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF MARKETS IN FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS DIRECTIVE 2004/39/CE OR CANADIAN INVESTORS WHO ARE AN “ACCREDITED INVESTOR”, AS DEFINED IN NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 45-106 AND A “PERMITTED CLIENT” AS DEFINED IN
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 31-103. FOR ATTENDEES AT THE CANADIAN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS IN PENSIONS CAIP EAST 2017. NOT FOR ONWARD DISTRIBUTION.
2 -
L A F R A N Ç A I S E G L O B A L I N V E S T M E N T S O L U T I O N SSpeaker: Luc Dumontier – Head of Factor Investing
Luc Dumontier
Head of Factor
Investing and
Senior Portfolio
Manager
Luc joined LFIS in September 2013. Prior to LFIS, he was Head of Absolute Return Management at HSBC
AM. From 2004 to 2011, Luc was in charge of Absolute Return Management at Sinopia where he
developed quantitative strategies including Global Bond Market Neutral, Currency Overlay, Global Tactical
Asset Allocation and Multi Government Bonds. He started his career in 1998 as an equity portfolio
manager. Luc has led a “Portfolio Management” class at the SFAF (French Society of Financial Analysts)
since 2002 and at the AFG (French Asset Management Association) since 2011.
Luc holds a Master’s degree of Economy and a Master’s degree in money, bank and finance from Paris-
Sorbonne University.
3 -
P R E M I A 2 . 0Agenda
The “Death” of Diversification?
Factor Investing: A Different Approach to Capturing Performance
The Principal Challenges
LFIS’ 10 Commandments for Premia Investing
4 -
T H E “ D E A T H ” O F D I V E R S I F I C A T I O N ?The Limits of Traditional Asset Allocation Methods (1/2)
On average, traditional asset allocation approaches have failed to deliver:
DIVERSIFICATION … OR PERFORMANCE
Sophisticated investors are not immune to this “re-correlation trap”:
Research by renowned U.S. academics demonstrated that the investment portfolio of the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund,
Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global carries 99% exposure to a single risk – equities
An inability to deliver uncorrelated performance drove the largest public pension fund in the U.S., the California Public Employees’
Retirement System(“CalPERS”), to instead focus on an index-based approach
Correlation vs. Equity
Betavs. Equity
Sharpe Ratio
Equity Markets 100% 1.00 0.22
Flexible Funds 76% 0.26 0.24
Global Asset Allocation Funds 80% 0.33 0.19
Balanced Funds 81% 0.29 0.18
Alternative Funds 72% 0.25 -0.26
Flexible Funds
Global Asset Allocation Funds
Balanced Funds
Alternative FundsEquity Markets Flexible Funds: BAIF – UCITS / Open-ended / Flexible funds
Global Asset Allocation Funds: BAIF – UCITS / Open-ended / Flexible funds
Balanced Funds: BAIF – UCITS / Open-ended / Flexible funds
Equity Markets: MSCI World
Alternative Funds: HFRX Global
Sources: Bloomberg, La Française Investment Solutions.
All Indices are converted in euros.
5 -
T H E “ D E A T H ” O F D I V E R S I F I C A T I O N ?The Limits of Traditional Asset Allocation Methods (2/2)
Traditional asset allocation approaches have two major flaws:
ALLOCATING BY CAPITAL RATHER THAN RISK OVERRELIANCE ON TRADITIONAL “ALTERNATIVES”
Risk Parity (ERC)
Continental European Model: 30%/70%
equity/bond allocation = Equity Risk Allocation
of 90% to 100%Anglo-Saxon Model: 60%/40%
equity/bond allocation
SINCE 2005, “ALTERNATIVE” ASSET CLASSES HAVE LARGELY
FAILED TO DELIVER DIVERSIFICATION VERSUS EQUITY MARKETS
Average correlation of 80%
Practically systematic simultaneous extreme drawdowns
Sources: Bloomberg, La Française Investment Solutions.
FACTOR INVESTING
A Di f fe ren t Approach to Captu r ing Per fo rmance
7 -
A F A C T O R - B A S E D A P P R O A C HAn Established Framework – Newly Relevant Today
Asset classes are comprised of factors which explain most of their risk and return characteristics
The approach to portfolio construction is at fault, rather than an absence of diversification
“Factors are to assets what nutrients are to food”Professors John Cochrane and Andrew Ang
Academics and investment professionals have identified three major types of factors:
Macroeconomic factors: Inflation, growth, etc.
Microeconomic factors: Company size, valuation multiples, etc.
Behavioral Factors: Risk aversion, flows, momentum, regulation, etc.
These factors offer remuneration (a premia) for:
The assumption of an additional structural, non-diversifiable risk “Risk Premia”
The operational capacity to implement strategies that profit from certain behavioral biases of market participants linked to
investment constraints and flows “Style Premia”
8 -
F R O M F A C T O R S T O P R E M I AMacroeconomic Risk Premia
Low or Falling Growth High Growth
High or Rising Inflation High Inflation
Inflation linked Bonds (TIPS) Real AssetsCommodities real estate, timberland,Infrastructure farmland, energy, …
Low Growth High Growth
Low Inflation or Deflation Low Inflation
Cash EquityGovernment Bonds Corporate Debt
Economic Growth
Infl
ati
on
Sources: Callan, La Française Investment Solutions.
RISKY ASSET CLASSES VS. ECONOMIC GROWTH
GOVERNMENT BONDS VS. INFLATION
ASSET CLASSES VS. MACROECONOMIC FACTORS
Traditional asset classes remunerate investors for
bearing macroeconomic risks
As the number of macroeconomic factors is limited, asset
classes tend to be highly correlated
Complementary sources of diversification are
needed
Sources: Bloomberg, La Française Investment Solutions - Based on U.S. data.
9 -
F R O M F A C T O R S T O P R E M I AMicroeconomic Risk Premia
Some securities with common microeconomic characteristics outperform others
Long/short strategies can be created to capture the outperformance, which is independent of market moves
Outperformance remunerates an additional structural, non-diversifiable risk
Market
Undervalued small capswith strong operating profits
Overvalued large caps
Overvalued large capswith low operating profits
Large caps
Small caps
Undervalued small caps
Sources: Database from Kenneth French on the U.S. market, La Française Investment Solutions.
CUMULATIVE PERFORMANCE (%)
GROUPS OF EQUITIES WITH COMMON CHARACTERISTICS SMART BETA VS. RISK PREMIA
10 -
F R O M F A C T O R S T O P R E M I AStyle Premia
Premia linked to behavioral biases:
Ex. the tendency of investors to react only
progressively to new information (anchoring)
creates the momentum phenomenon
Premia linked to flows and investor constraints:
Ex: The volatility premia in U.S. markets, which stems from:
1. Investor risk aversion
2. Structural flows linked to hedging of variable annuity products
Sources: Bloomberg, La Française Investment Solutions.Sources: La Française Investment Solutions proprietary methodology. Series based on a volatility of 1%.
MOMENTUM PREMIA WITHIN MAIN ASSET CLASSESIMPLIED VS. REALIZED VOLATILITY (1-MONTH)
ON THE S&P500 INDEX
11 -
F R O M F A C T O R S T O P R E M I AAcademic Premia Are Embedded in All Asset Classes
Traditional / Long-Short
Equity ApproachPremia / Cross-Asset Approach
Bonds (NGB)Government bond allocation
L/S positions – Overall zero exposure
Implementation via futures, interest rate
swaps
Currencies (FX)FX allocation
Long / short positions
Implementation via exchange forwards,
non-deliverable forwards
Commodities (CDY)Intra-curve allocation
Commodity allocation
Implementation via total return swaps
→ 10-yr nominal yield - 1-yr expected
inflation and GDP growth
→ Relative PPP, productivity
differential
→ Relative slope of the forward
curves (backwardation vs. contango)
→ Current carry: 10-yr - 3-mth slope
→ Expected carry: short-term
dynamic of the slope
→ Current carry: 3-mth interest rate
differential
→ Expected carry: interest rate term
structure, economic surprise index
→ Spread contract depending on the
term structure curvature for each
commodity
→ Price momentum and economic
data momentum
→ Reversal: past week / month
→ Price momentum, order flows,
economic momentum
→ Reversal: past week / month
→ Long short maturities / short long
maturities, country and duration
neutral
→ Carry time spreads ahead and after
the congested traditional roll period
ASSET CLASSES
Equities (EQY)Country allocation and stock selection
Long / short positions - Overall zero
exposure
Implementation via futures, equity swaps
Value→ Price/ER, P/Book Value, P/Sales,
P/Free Cash Flow
Carry
ST Reversal /
MT Momentum
→ Price and earnings momentum
→ Reversal: past week / month
Low Risk /
Quality
→ Long leveraged low risk stocks /
short high risk stocks
→ ROE, CF Margin, earnings growth
Liquidity → Recent trend of most liquid stocks
THE PRINCIPAL CHALLENGES
13 -
T H E P R I N C I P A L C H A L L E N G E SUnder Which Conditions Does A Premia Approach Work?
Increasing the number of premia in a contemplated portfolio only increases the potential Sharpe ratio if
the premia are decorrelated
Source: La Française Investment Solutions - theoretical calculations provided for illustrative purposes only.
If correlation is not minimized the
Sharpe ratio will level out –
irrespective of the number of
additional premia added
Addition of uncorrelated premia can
allow for steady augmentation of
the Sharpe ratio
Individual Sharpe ratio = 0.4
Paiwise correlation between premia = 0%
Sharpe ratio = 0.6 / Correlation = 30%
Sharpe ratio = 0.6 / Correlation = 70%
Number of premia included in the portfolio
Ove
rall
Sh
arp
e r
ati
o o
f th
e e
qu
alri
sk
we
igh
ted
po
rtfo
lio
14 -
T H E P R I N C I P A L C H A L L E N G E S Recorrelation Risk
Realized contemplated portfolio volatility is a function of the level of effective correlation between underlying
strategies
Source: La Française Investment Solutions.
Theoretical calculations provided for illustrative purposes only;
Re-correlation can dramatically
increase risk levels
and the associated risk of loss
Effective pairwise correlation between premia
Eff
ecti
ve
vo
lati
lity
of
the o
ve
rall
po
rtfo
lio 30 premia
20
5
10
15 -
T H E P R I N C I P A L C H A L L E N G E SPossible Drivers of Recorrelation for Academic Premia
2 Premia may be sensitive to a common risk: Example – Macroeconomic Risk
2 Premia may have the same embedded positons: Example - De-Peg of the Swiss Franc
Sources: Deutsche Bank, La Française Investment Solutions.
Forced selling / de-leveraging: Example –
Equity Factors during the “Quant Crisis” (7-9 Aug. 2007)
Sources: JP Morgan, La Française Investment Solutions.
Re-correlation to the underlying market: Example – Equity Factors in the years 2008 and 2009
Sources: Deutsche Bank, La Française Investment Solutions.
Sources: JP Morgan, La Française Investment Solutions.
LFIS’ 10 COMMANDMENTS
FOR PREMIA INVESTING
17 -
1 0 C O M M A N D M E N T S F O R P R E M I A I N V E S T I N G1. Go Beyond the Academic (1/3)
Efficiently capture a large number of investable premia by taking long and short positions across several
asset classes while avoiding any structural bias
Carry
Value
Carry
Momentum
Volatility
Long assets with the highest carry / Short assets with the lowest carry
Long most undervalued (less overvalued) assets / Short most overvalued (less undervalued)
Long assets that have outperformed (medium-term) / Short assets that have underperformed
Reversal
Quality / Low Risk Long leveraged less risky assets / simultaneously short riskier assets
AcademicPremia
Plain Vanilla
Instruments
Implied
Premia
Derivatives
Relative value strategies between equity index implied dividends and spots
Relative value strategies: buy volatility that is deemed cheap and sell volatility deemed rich (between
assets of the same class and/or different classes)
Correlation
Arbitrage
Strategies
Liquidity / Carry Premia on
Liquid Assets
Cash and Derivative
Instruments
Bond/CDS Basis
Implied Equity Index Repo Rate
Convertible Arbitrage
Long assets that have underperformed (short-term) / Short assets that have outperformed
Dividends
Dispersion strategies: volatility of an index vs. volatilities of index constituents, volatility spread
between customized baskets
18 -
G O B E Y O N D T H E A C A D E M I CCase Study: Silver (XAGUSD) vs. Gold (XAUUSD) (1)
Transaction Details: Volatility spread silver vs. gold(both quoted in USD)
Buy implied volatility spread and receive the realized volatility
spread at maturity (both silver minus gold)
A mean-reversion strategy based on the historically observed
relationship between the implied and realized volatility spreads
Transaction done at the launch of the Fund (Dec. 2013)
Historically attractive entry point (traded spread)
Rationale
Systematic market flows overstate implied volatility of gold:
Continuous purchase of call options on gold by
investors to hedge against potential tail risks
Continuous purchase of put options by gold producers
to hedge their holdings
The relatively expensive implied volatility on gold reduces
the implied volatility spread silver minus gold
Creating an attractive entry point
Historical Observations (December 2006 to May 2016)
Entry at a point of high dislocation makes the expected
mark to market (based on historical observations)
manageable, even during the Global Financial Crisis
Sharpe ratio of 1.8
(1) Historical data – for information only. Past performance is not necessarily an indication of future results. There can be no guarantee that this transaction will generate a comparable Sharpe ratio in the future.
Understandable
Attractive
Investable
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1Y HV Spread 1Y IV Spread Entry Level
Entry Point
19 -
1 0 C O M M A N D M E N T S F O R P R E M I A I N V E S T I N G2. Do not Invent Factors
Cochrane, 2011 Premia Selection Process
Sourcing
On-going sourcing of premia
Selection
Strict qualification criteria
Attractive (after transaction
costs)
Understandable
Investable
Robust
Orthogonal / Diversifying
Internal Research
Market Research
Universe of Premia Opportunities
Eligible Premia
Sources: Campbell R. Harvey, Yann Liu and Heqing Zhu.
“Now we have a zoo of factors”
20 -
1 0 C O M M A N D M E N T S F O R P R E M I A I N V E S T I N G3. Understand the Underlying Rationale
Sources of Premia
Rational / Economic
Compensation for bearing systematic risk
Behavioral
Compensation for processing information better
Institutional / Market Microstructure
Compensation for having fewer constraints
Value Remuneration of the “value trap” risk Lottery golden ticket effect: Investors overestimate
the capacity of “glamour” assets to generate profits
Investors’ VAR constraints lead them to avoid
poorly performing investments
Reversal (ST) /
Momentum (MT)
Momentum premia remunerates the risk of a
severe turn in the economic cycle
Short-term reversal due to the disposition effect
Medium-term momentum due to anchoring
Indexed and portfolio insurance strategies
mechanically reinforce price momentum
Low Risk Volatility is the greatest opposing force to
compound returns
Riskier assets are overpaid due to a preference for
lotteries and representativeness
Certain constraints (leverage, capital,
benchmark) reinforce demand for risky assets
which have become expensive
Carry Compensation for negative skew / crash risk Investors minimize the probability of potential losses
on uncertain parts of transactions
Remuneration for being a provider of liquidity in
stressed periods
Volatility /
Correlation
The volatility premia remunerates for the
asymmetric nature of realized volatility
Investors tend to skew towards purchasing
protection against spikes in volatility
Volatility: Demand/supply imbalances create
distortions
Correlation: Index protection makes the index
volatility expensive vs. its components, etc.
Carry / Liquidity Compensation for the risk of realizing a negative
mark-to-market if a strategy is unwound early
Stop loss behavior, especially in times of crisis,
tends to increase the volatility of liquidity-based
positions but accentuate the opportunities
Primary flows may create distortions that
arbitrageurs are now unable to capture due to
regulatory uncertainties
21 -
1 0 C O M M A N D M E N T S F O R P R E M I A I N V E S T I N G4. Avoid Data Mining or Over-Fitting
Simulated Performance ≠ Actual Performance Verify that premia are resilient when
parameters change:
Source: La Française Investment Solutions.
Sources: A. Suhonen, M. Lennkh and F. Perez.
Distribution of Sharpe ratios
Distribution of correlations
Investment banking strategy performance
Ensuring the robustness of the equity low risk premia strategy
22 -
1 0 C O M M A N D M E N T S F O R P R E M I A I N V E S T I N G5. Control Exposure to Underlying Asset Classes
Factorial Approach to Portfolio Construction
Source: La Française Investment Solutions - Principal Component Analysis (“PCA”) is run on a monthly basis using 1-year rolling weekly data since 2001. As of December 31, 2016.
PCA WITHIN ASSET CLASSES
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
Government Bonds (G10)
Currencies (G10)
Equities (OECD countries)
Commodities(BCOM)
Firs
t P
CA
Ris
k Fa
cto
r
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
Government Bonds (G10)
Currencies (G10)
Equities (OECD countries)
Commodities(BCOM)
Seco
nd
PC
A R
isk
Fact
or
PCA AMONG G10 CURRENCIES
23 -
1 0 C O M M A N D M E N T S F O R P R E M I A I N V E S T I N G6. Control Exposure to Other Alternative Premia in the Portfolio
VOLATILITY BUDGET MANAGEMENT
Manage the volatility budget to maintain room
in the event that premia generally re-correlate
0%
7%
Target
Typical Initial
Volatility Budget
Source: La Française Investment Solutions.
PORTFOLIO ORTHOGONALISATION OF THE LOW RISK PREMIA
24 -
1 0 C O M M A N D M E N T S F O R P R E M I A I N V E S T I N G7. Minimize Idiosyncratic Risks
Source: La Française Investment Solutions.
LFIS LOW RISK SIMULATIONS BY GEOGRAPHIC ZONE: 2000 to 2015
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
Euro Zone
US
UK
25 -
1 0 C O M M A N D M E N T S F O R P R E M I A I N V E S T I N G8. Monitor Correlations in Specific Situations
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15
Carry / Implied Carry / Academic Implied / Academic
ROLLING CORRELATION BETWEEN THE THREE PREMIA FAMILIES
Source: La Française Investment Solutions.
Past performance is not indicative or constitutes a representation or guarantee as to future results or performance. The historical investment results and performance data described in this material are not an
indicator nor a guide of future investment results. Such simulations are intended only to give recipients information concerning the general experience of LFIS and is not intended as a representation or warranty by
LFIS, or any other person or entity as to the actual composition of or performance of any future investments. No statement in this document is intended to be nor may be construed as a profit forecast and there can
be no assurance that the assumptions described herein, the returns and targets indicated herein will be achieved.
26 -
1 0 C O M M A N D M E N T S F O R P R E M I A I N V E S T I N G9. Beware of the Temptation to Time Factors
ILLUSTRATION OF THE SHORTFALL IN DIVERSIFICATION WITH 5 UNCORRELATED FACTORS
CONSERVATIVE TACTICAL ALLOCATION
Conservative versus the strategic allocation to preserve
the diversification power of the strategy
For illustration purposes only.
27 -
1 0 C O M M A N D M E N T S F O R P R E M I A I N V E S T I N G10. Invest in People and Infrastructure (High Barriers to Entry)
LFIS’ Unique
Investment
Infrastructure
Efficient Implementation
while Minimizing
Transaction Costs
Robust network of counterparties
and agreements
Wide panel of agreements from
supervisory authorities
Numerous ISDAs
Direct access to listed instruments
Low negotiated transaction costs
Attractive refinancing facilities
28 -
L F I S P R E M I A F U N D SResearch Focus
Luc Dumontier
Head of Factor
Investing, Senior
Portfolio Manager
Guillaume Garchery
Head of Quantitative
Research and
Development, Senior
Portfolio Manager
Find the latest LFIS research on our website:
https://www.lafrancaise-gis.com
The persons referenced herein may not necessarily continue to be employed by LFIS and may not perform or continue to perform services for LFIS, the premia team or the teams mentioned above.
APPENDIX
30 -
L F I S P R E M I A S T R A T E G I E S T E A MPortfolio Management Team (1)
(1) Information regarding the background and experience of LFIS personnel is provided for information purposes only. Such persons may not necessarily continue to be employed by LFIS and may not continue to
perform services for the teams mentioned above.
(2) New employees identified and to be announced shortly.
Chairman, CEO and CIO of LFISSofiene Haj-Taieb
Quant. Research & DevelopmentGuillaume Garchery 4 Professionals (+1) (2)
Absolute ReturnGuillaume Dupin
Guillaume Garchery
22 years of experience
Last position: Deputy Head of Global Markets at
Société Générale Corporate and Investment Banking
10 years of experience
Last Position:
Quantitative Portfolio Manager
at Avenir Finance Investment
Managers
Yann Yeramian
9 years of experience
Last Position:
Credit and Convertible Bond
Trader at BRED Banque
Populaire
Yann Le Her
12 years of experience
Last Position:
Head of Equity Derivatives
Trading - Americas at HSBC
Implied and Liquidity / Carry Premia
Guillaume Dupin
Factor InvestingLuc Dumontier
Simon Lepine
4 years of experience
Last Position:
Portfolio Manager – Fund
Solutions at LFIS
Academic Premia
Luc Dumontier
To Be Announced (2)
To Be Announced
16 years of experience
Last position: Global Head of Equity Derivatives Structured and Flow Trading at Crédit Agricole Corporate
and Investment Banking
19 years of experience
Last position: Head of Absolute Return Management at HSBC Asset
Management - France
31 -
I M P O R T A N T N O T I C E
This material (the “Material”) is being provided by La Française Investment Solutions in good faith on a strictly confidential and non-reliance basis, solely at the recipient’s request for information and for discussion purposes
only. It may not be copied or circulated, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of La Française Investment Solutions or any of its affiliates (“LFGIS”). This Material is solely for the use of the recipient who has
received it directly from LFGIS. It is not for use by retail customers under any circumstances. This Material does not constitute an offer or solicitation, nor is it the basis for any contract for the purchase or sale of any
investment, security or product or for participating in any investment strategy. LFGIS disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this Material.
This Material has not been reviewed, approved or disapproved by any federal or state securities commission, state administrator or any other regulatory authority in any jurisdiction. The distribution of this Material in certain
jurisdictions may be restricted by law. The recipient represents that it is able to receive this Material without contravention of any applicable legal or regulatory restrictions in the jurisdiction in which it resides or conducts
business. LFGIS does not accept any responsibility for ensuring that a recipient complies with applicable laws and regulations. The Material does not constitute, and may not be used for or in connection with, an offer or
solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.
Due to its simplification, this Material is partial and thus the information can be subjective. The information set forth herein does not purport to be complete and is subject to change without notice. This Material does not take
into account the recipient’s objectives, financial situation or needs. This Material shall not be deemed to constitute investment advice and/or tax, accounting, regulatory, legal or other advice and it should not be relied upon
as the basis for a decision to enter into a transaction or as the basis for an investment decision. The recipient should make its own appraisal of the risks. The recipient is urged to consult with its own advisers with respect to
legal, tax, regulatory, financial, accounting and other matters concerning any investment decision. Investments in any fund or product managed and/or advised by LFGIS are accepted from eligible investors only, on the
basis of the relevant current prospectus, information memorandum or final documentation (as amended or supplemented from time to time). Potential investors should be aware that any direct or indirect investment in any
investment vehicle described herein is subject to significant risks, including total loss of capital, such investments may be highly volatile, and there are significant restrictions on transferability and redemption of an interest in
such investment vehicle. Liquidity of an investment described herein is not guaranteed and there are circumstances under which such liquidity may be restricted or may not be possible. Investors should be able to bear the
financial risks and limited liquidity of this investment. Alternative investments such are suitable only for sophisticated investors who are able to sustain a loss of their entire investment. No assurance can be given that the
investment objectives of the investment vehicles presented herein will be achieved or that an investor will not lose all or substantially all of his or her investment. Investment managers may use investment strategies and
financial instruments that, while affording the opportunity to generate positive returns, also provide the opportunity for increased volatility and significant risk of loss. The investments described herein are also subject to the
risk of counterparty or issuer default. This brief statement does not disclose all the risks and other significant aspects in connection with transactions of the type described in the Material. Any decision to enter into any
transaction should be made after reviewing carefully and rely solely on the relevant prospectus or information memorandum (in particular, for further explanation of the risks and conflicts of interest associated with the types
of investments illustrated herein), conducting such diligence and investigations as the investor deems necessary and consulting the investor’s own legal, accounting and tax advisors in order to make an independent
determination of the suitability and consequences of any investment.
Analysis and conclusions express the views of LFGIS and may be subject to change without notice. All information, analysis and conclusions herein present LFGIS’s current knowledge and market estimation at the time of
its production. Nevertheless it can come to unintended erroneous statements or presentations and the information may change at any time without previous announcements and/or notices to the recipient of this Material.
Thus, a liability or guarantee for the up-to-datedness, correctness and completeness of the allocated information, estimation and opinion cannot be assumed. Information contained herein may vary from previous or future
published versions of this Material. Information regarding the background and experience of personnel of LFGIS are provided for information purposes only. Such persons may not necessarily continue to be employed by
LFGIS and may not perform or continue to perform services for LFGIS. The reference to league tables and awards are not an indicator of the futures places in league tables or awards. Unless otherwise noted, information
provided herein is current as of the date of this Material.
The data including but not limited to scenarios and investment guidelines set forth in this Material are presented for illustrative purposes only and such data could vary significantly from the final investment policy and/or
actual results. Where past performance, past experience and track record information is provided, this is not necessarily representative of future results: performance is not constant over time and the value of investments
may fall as well as rise. No representation is made that any results or other figures indicated in this Material will be achieved and that investments will achieve comparable results that targeted returns. Investment may be
subject to gearing and should be considered higher risk than a similar ungeared investment. Investment returns may be subject to foreign currency exchange risks. Actual results on unrealized investments described herein
will depend on, among other factors, future operating results, the value of the assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, legal and contractual restrictions on transfer that may limit the liquidity, any related
transactions costs and the timing and manner of sale, all of which may differ materially from the assumptions and circumstances on which the valuations used in the prior performance data contained herein are based.
Some statements and analysis in this Material and some examples provided are based upon or derived from the hypothetical performance of models developed by LFGIS and/or third parties. In particular, in connection with
certain investments for which no external pricing information is available, LFGIS will rely on internal pricing models, using certain modeling and data assumptions. Such valuations may vary from valuations performed by
other parties for similar types of investments. Models are inherently imperfect and there is no assurance that any returns or other figures indicated in this Material and derived from such models will be achieved. LFGIS
expressly disclaims any responsibility for (i) the accuracy of the models or estimates used in deriving the analyses; (ii) any errors or omissions in computing or disseminating the analyses; or (iii) any uses to which the
analyses are put.
32 -
I M P O R T A N T N O T I C E
Any hypothetical illustrations, forecasts and estimates contained in this Material are forward looking statements and are based upon assumptions. Hypothetical illustrations are necessarily speculative in nature and it can be
expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the hypothetical illustrations will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Accordingly, the hypothetical illustrations are only an estimate and LFGIS
assumes no duty to update any forward looking statement. This Material may also contain historical market data; however, historical market trends are not reliable indicators of future market behavior.
Any forward looking information and past performance information contained in this Material was prepared without a view necessarily towards public disclosure or compliance or conformity with published guidelines of the
US Securities and Exchange Commission or the Institute of Certified Public Accountants or with generally accepted accounting principles, in each case whether relating to historical, pro forma or other financial or statistical
information or data. LFGIS makes no representation or warranty (express or implied) of any nature nor is responsible or liable in any way with respect to the truthfulness, completeness or accuracy of any information,
projection, representation or warranty (express or implied) in, or omission from, this information.
Although some information has been provided by LFGIS, the information is based on information furnished by third parties the accuracy and completeness of which has not been verified by LFGIS or any person. All
information and data in this Material is established on the accounting information, on market data basis or has been sourced from a number of recognized industry providers. All accounting information, except otherwise
specified, is un-audited. While such sources are believed to be reliable and accurate, none of LFGIS or its respective affiliates, directors, officers, employees, partners, members or shareholders assumes any responsibility
for the accuracy or completeness of such information. Details of these sources are available upon request. Any pictures, plans, drawings, diagrams or schedules set forth in this Material are provided for information
purposes only. LFGIS makes no representation or warranty (express or implied) of any nature nor is responsible or liable in any way with respect to the truthfulness, completeness or accuracy of any information, projection,
representation or warranty (express or implied) in, or omission from, this information. All names, trademarks, logos and slogans identifying the La Française group’s products and/or services are exclusive property of the La
Française group and are restricted from use of any kind unless prior written consent is provided for by the La Française group or the relevant entities within the La Française group.
Notice to European investors: Any potential investment in any securities or financial instruments described herein may not be suitable for all investors. Any prospective investment will require you to represent that you are a
“professional client”, as defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive “MiFID”. The securities and financial instruments described herein may not be available in all jurisdictions. Investments in or linked to hedge
funds are highly speculative and may be adversely affected by the unregulated nature of hedge funds and the use of trading strategies and techniques. Also, hedge funds are typically less transparent in terms of information
and pricing and have much higher fees than registered funds. Investors in hedge funds may not be afforded the same protections as “retail investors” as defined in the MiFID.
Notice to U.S. investors: any potential investment in any securities of financial instruments described herein may not be suitable for all investors. The shares of the Fund (the “Shares”) have not been registered under the
United States Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act"), and the Fund has not been registered under the United States Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"). The Shares may not be offered, sold, transferred or
delivered, directly or indirectly, in the United States, its territories or possessions or to US Persons except to certain qualified US institutions in reliance on certain exemptions from the registration requirements of the 1933
Act and the 1940 Act and with the consent of the Fund. Investments in or linked to hedge funds are highly speculative and may be adversely affected by the unregulated nature of hedge funds and the use of trading
strategies and techniques that are typically prohibited for funds registered under the ‘40 Act. Also, hedge funds are typically less transparent in terms of information and pricing and have much higher fees than registered
funds. Investors in hedge funds may not be afforded the same protections as investors in funds registered under the ’40 Act including limitations on fees, controls over investment policies and reporting requirements.
Notice to Canadian investors: any potential investment in any securities or financial instruments described herein may not be suitable for all investors. Any prospective investment will require you to represent that you are an
“accredited investor”, as defined in National Instrument 45-106. The securities and financial instruments described herein may not be available in all jurisdictions of Canada. Investment vehicles described herein will not be
offered by prospectus in Canada and will not be subject to National Instrument 81-102 and National Instrument 81-106. In addition, investments in or linked to hedge funds are highly speculative and may be adversely
affected by the unregulated nature of hedge funds and the use of trading strategies and techniques that are typically prohibited for prospectus offered funds. Also, hedge funds are typically less transparent in terms of
information and pricing and have much higher fees than registered funds. Investors in hedge funds may not be afforded the same protections as investors in funds registered under the ’40 Act including limitations on fees,
controls over investment policies and reporting requirements.
Notice to Canadian investors: any potential investment in any securities or financial instruments described herein may not be suitable for all investors. Any prospective investment will require you to represent that you are an
“accredited investor”, as defined in National Instrument 45-106 and a “permitted client” as defined in National Instrument 31-103. The securities and financial instruments described herein may not be available in all
jurisdictions of Canada. Investment vehicles described herein will not be offered by prospectus in Canada and will not be subject to National Instrument 81-102 and National Instrument 81-106. Investment vehicles
described herein are offered only on the basis of the relevant current prospectus (from another jurisdiction), offering memorandum of final documentation (as amended or supplemented) (the “Offering Document”) and the
information contained herein is qualified in its entirety by the information to be contained in the Offering Document. In addition, investments in or linked to hedge funds are highly speculative and may be adversely affected
by the unregulated nature of hedge funds and the use of trading strategies and techniques that are typically prohibited for prospectus offered funds. Also, hedge funds are typically less transparent in terms of information
and pricing and have much higher fees than registered funds. Investors in hedge funds may not be afforded the same protections as investors in funds registered under the ’40 Act including limitations on fees, controls over
investment policies and reporting requirements.
This Material is not subject to the Autorité des Marchés Financiers’ (“AMF”) approval and was not submitted for approval to the AMF.
© 2017 La Française Investment Solutions and its Affiliated Companies. All rights reserved.
For forty years, La Française has been developing core competencies in third party asset management.
La Française has a multi-affiliate business model organized around four core activities: securities, real estate, investment
solutions and direct financing. The group caters to institutional and private clients throughout the world.
With 559 professionals and offices in Paris, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, London, Luxembourg, Madrid and Milan. La Française
manages close to 60 billion euros in assets.
La Française has a unique and solid shareholder structure that associates a well-known bank, Crédit Mutuel Nord Europe, with
company employees and directors and grants the group total independence in the daily exercise of its business activity.