Upload
phamnguyet
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Monday
26 March 2018
P A R L I A M E N T A R Y D E B A T E S
(HANSARD)
HOUSE OF LORDS
WRITTEN STATEMENTS AND
WRITTEN ANSWERS
Written Statements ................................................ 1
Written Answers ..................................................... 5
Session 2017-19
No. 88
[I] indicates that the member concerned has a relevant registered interest. The full register of interests can be found at
http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords-interests/
Members who want a printed copy of Written Answers and Written Statements should notify the Printed Paper Office.
This printed edition is a reproduction of the original text of Answers and Statements, which can be found on the internet
at http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/.
Ministers and others who make Statements or answer Questions are referred to only by name, not their ministerial or
other title. The current list of ministerial and other responsibilities is as follows.
Minister Responsibilities
Baroness Evans of Bowes Park Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal
Earl Howe Minister of State, Ministry of Defence and Deputy Leader of the House of Lords
Lord Agnew of Oulton Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Lord Ashton of Hyde Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Lord Bates Minister of State, Department for International Development
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local
Government and Wales Office
Baroness Buscombe Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions
Lord Callanan Minister of State, Department for Exiting the European Union
Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen Whip
Earl of Courtown Deputy Chief Whip
Lord Duncan of Springbank Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Northern Ireland Office and Scotland Office
Baroness Fairhead Minister of State, Department for International Trade
Lord Gardiner of Kimble Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs
Baroness Goldie Whip
Lord Henley Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial
Strategy
Lord Keen of Elie Advocate-General for Scotland and Ministry of Justice Spokesperson
Lord O'Shaughnessy Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health and Social Care
Baroness Stedman-Scott Whip
Baroness Sugg Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Transport, Whip
Lord Taylor of Holbeach Chief Whip
Baroness Vere of Norbiton Whip
Baroness Williams of Trafford Minister of State, Home Office
Lord Young of Cookham Whip
Viscount Younger of Leckie Whip
© Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords 2018
This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence,
which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/
Written Statements 26 March 2018 Page 1
Written Statements Monday, 26 March 2018
Energy Policy
[HLWS566]
Lord Henley: My hon Friend the Parliamentary Under-
Secretary of State (Richard Harrington) has today made
the following statement.
In a Written Ministerial Statement of 11 January, the
Government set out its two-fold strategy for Euratom
Exit. This strategy included a commitment to put in place
all the necessary measures to ensure that the UK can
operate as an independent and responsible nuclear state
upon the UK’s withdrawal from Euratom, at which point
the UK will be legally responsible for its own nuclear
safeguards regime.
These measures include the negotiation of bilateral
safeguards agreements with the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA). These new agreements – a
Voluntary Offer Agreement and an Additional Protocol –
will replace the current, trilateral, safeguards agreements
between UK, the IAEA and Euratom.
We have made good progress in these negotiations.
Both the UK and IAEA are clear that the new agreements
should follow the same principles and scope as the current
trilateral agreements. We will continue to offer a
comprehensive facilities list to the IAEA, enabling them
to designate and inspect their chosen sites for the
purposes of international verification.
In order to ensure continuity for the nuclear sector, on
22 March the Government notified the IAEA that the UK
will be taking legal responsibility for its own nuclear
safeguards regime in the long term and started the process
of seeking formal IAEA agreement to a new Voluntary
Offer Agreement and accompanying Additional Protocol
for the UK. We expect these agreements to undergo UK
ratification later this year. The agreements will only come
into force once existing agreements no longer apply.
We will continue to seek a close association with
Euratom, including the possibility of future co-operation
on nuclear non-proliferation and safeguards, and any
potential role for Euratom in supporting the establishment
of the UK’s own domestic safeguards regime.
The Written Ministerial Statement of 11 January
included a commitment to report back every three months
about overall progress on Euratom to keep Parliament
updated. I am pleased to confirm that the first such update
has today been provided to Parliament. The paper is being
placed in the Libraries of both Houses. The next update
on progress is scheduled for June 2018.
Fire Reform
[HLWS565]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: My rt hon Friend the
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Amber
Rudd) has today made the following Written Ministerial
Statement:
I am pleased to announce that I have approved
proposals from the Police and Crime Commissioners
(PCC) for Cambridgeshire (Jason Ablewhite),
Staffordshire (Matthew Ellis) and West Mercia (John
Campion) to take on governance of their local fire and
rescue service(s).
I have carefully considered each proposal, taking into
account representations made by the public, police and
fire personnel, and relevant local authorities in response
to each PCC’s local consultation. In each case I obtained
an Independent Assessment of the PCCs’ proposal,
carried out by the Chartered Institute for Public Finance
and Accounting (CIPFA), which I have had regard to and
today publish in the interests of transparency. A copy of
each of the Independent Assessments will be placed in the
House Library and published on Gov.UK shortly.
Having had regard to this material, I am of the view that
in each case, a transfer of fire governance to the PCC is in
the interests of economy, efficiency and effectiveness,
and that there is no adverse effect on public safety.
These PCCs will join Roger Hirst of Essex, who
became the country’s first Police, Fire and Crime
Commissioner in October 2017. My officials will now
prepare the necessary statutory instrument to give effect
to these proposals in the coming months.
As directly accountable leaders overseeing both fire and
policing, each PCC can increase efficiency and
effectiveness, maximise available resources and improve
the service delivered to the public. I look forward to
seeing the benefits this will bring to each area.
High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe)
Bill: Additional Provision
[HLWS562]
Baroness Sugg: My Honourable Friend, the
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport
(Nusrat Ghani) has made the following Ministerial
Statement.
I would like to inform the House about the introduction
of an Additional Provision to the High Speed Rail (West
Midlands – Crewe) Bill, which is currently before the
Select Committee.
The Additional Provision proposes a number of changes
to the powers in the Bill for the Select Committee’s
consideration. Those directly and specially affected by
these changes may petition against them, and once any
petitioners have been heard, the Committee will decide
whether the amendments to the Bill should be made. The
petition period, set by the Chairman of Ways and Means,
finishes on 27 April.
One of the changes in the Additional Provision relates
to a minor change in the alignment of the Phase 2a route
near Stone. Other changes relate to ongoing design
discussions with utility companies, to highway works on
junctions to address traffic and safety issues, and
Page 2 26 March 2018 Written Statements
requirements for additional land for environmental
mitigation works. In some cases, these changes affect land
some distance from the line of route.
Full details are shown in the plans and sections
deposited alongside the Additional Provision. Affected
landowners will receive formal notification this week,
including information on how to petition against the
changes if they should decide to do so.
Standing Orders require that an Estimate of Expense be
prepared, to a prescribed format. This sets out the gross
costs of the land and works in the Additional Provision.
However, the costs of works and land avoided through
these amendments is expected to produce an overall
reduction in the costs of the scheme.
I am also publishing an Environmental Statement
setting out any likely significant effects from the changes
in the Additional Provision, alongside a supplementary
environmental statement reporting new environmental
information relating to the scheme. In accordance with
Standing Orders, there is a public consultation on these
documents which will run until 14 May. The documents
will be put in the libraries of both Houses, and will also
be made available in locations open to the public in all
local authorities and parishes affected by changes.
Justice Update
[HLWS567]
Lord Keen of Elie: My right honourable friend the
Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (David
Gauke) has made the following Written Statement.
"I have today signed a Justice Devolution
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with London
Councils and the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime
(MOPAC).
This agreement will fundamentally change the way the
criminal justice and offender management systems
interact with local partners in London. We are moving
towards a model where greater local influence is seen in a
number of key delivery areas, including victims and
witness services, future probation services, innovative use
of electronic monitoring technologies, and specialist
services for young offenders and women in the criminal
justice system. We have also committed to explore jointly
more ambitious options, such as budget devolution for
certain groups of offenders in custody.
This is a crucial area of focus for the government.
Spending on criminal justice in London is significant,
estimated at £3.3bn per annum across at least 14 different
organisations at a national, regional and local level.
Reoffending costs £2.2bn in criminal justice costs alone.
London accounts for almost 20% of offenders and
reoffenders, at 76,000 and 19,000 respectively, and has a
prison population accounting for a similar proportion but
which is spread across 40 institutions nationally. Crime
and the impact of crime is not felt equally across London,
with the most vulnerable wards having three times as
many victims of burglary, robbery and sexual offences as
the least vulnerable wards.
In summary, the MoU covers the following areas:
Victims and witnesses
Work will aim to improve the experience for victims
and witnesses from the point a crime is reported to the
criminal conviction and beyond. Our ambition is to
establish a more integrated service for victims and
witnesses in London where victim support would be
provided by a single person rather than several agencies.
To help ensure a more seamless service for victims and
witnesses before trial, we will devolve commissioning of
support for witnesses at the pre-trial stage to MOPAC by
April 2019.
We will also use the findings from the MOPAC-
commissioned review of compliance with the Victims'
Code of Practice and the provision of victim services in
London to improve accountability and to inform local,
regional and national policy and commissioning.
Reducing reoffending
This section of the MoU commits my department to
working with local partners to ensure that the right
interventions are in place to reduce reoffending in the
capital. This will include delivery of a joint review of
probation services in London, and testing the co-
commissioning of ‘Through the Gate’ services.
Further to this, the MoJ, MOPAC and London Councils
will undertake a joint programme of work around robust
community sentence options, including considering
opportunities to co-commission and better integrate
services for the most complex, violent and persistent
offenders, and developing a London strategy to make the
most effective use of electronic monitoring.
A new approach to managing vulnerable cohorts
More women are sentenced to short custodial sentences
in London than in the rest of the country, and the overall
London youth reoffending rate of 47.5% remains
stubbornly higher than the rate for England and Wales,
which is currently 42.6%. This section sets out how we
will work in partnership to address the complex needs of
these vulnerable cohorts.
The MoU sets out a specific commitment to work
collaboratively to align priorities and budgets on female
offenders within London, exploring the scope for co-
designing credible alternatives to custody. On young
offenders, the MoJ will facilitate joint analysis with an
aim of improving outcomes, with particular focus on
addressing BAME disproportionality across the system.
MoJ, MOPAC and London boroughs will pursue joint
work programmes in relation to resettlement provision,
transition to the adult estate, and the opportunities to co-
commission a Secure School for London.
Financial devolution
Finally, we are seeking, in the longer term, to foster a
whole-system approach to offender management where
powers, resources and decisions are better aligned and
early intervention and prevention is incentivised. The
MoU sets out our intention to work with MOPAC and
London Councils to explore ways in which financial
Written Statements 26 March 2018 Page 3
models can incentivise greater investment in preventative
services which reduce demand on the CJS, particularly
considering opportunities with specific cohorts, including
female offenders and 18-25-year-old offenders.
This summary covers the main commitments of the
MoU, which is available in full at
https://www.london.gov.uk/mopac-publications-
0/memorandum-understanding-london-cjs. Work will
begin now to ensure we jointly deliver these commitments
as quickly as possible."
Local Plan Intervention
[HLWS561]
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth: My Rt Hon. Friend, the
Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local
Government (Sajid Javid) has today made the following
Written Ministerial Statement.
On 16 November 2017 I made a statement to the House
with an update on local plan progress. Up to date plans,
including local plans, are essential because they provide
clarity to communities and developers about where homes
should be built and where not, so that development is
planned rather than the result of speculative applications.
I made clear that a lack of progress will no longer be
tolerated.
The Government has abolished top-down regional
planning. But a locally-led planning system requires
elected local representatives to take the lead, listen to
local residents and business, and set out a clear
framework to build new homes, support the local
economy and protect the environment. Local Plans also
provide the framework within which groups can prepare
Neighbourhood Plans to shape development at local level.
Most councils have seized the opportunity that localism
provides; a small minority have not.
I wrote to fifteen local planning authorities to
commence the formal process of intervention in areas that
had either recently failed the duty to cooperate or failed to
meet the deadline set out in their Local Development
Schemes, the public timetable that all local planning
authorities are required to put in place.
Local Authorities had until 31 January 2018 to put
forward any exceptional circumstances, which, in their
view, justifies their failure to produce a Local Plan under
the local planning regime, as amended by the Localism
Act 2011 and Housing and Planning Act 2016.
I have now considered these responses. I am pleased
that since my letter of 16 November, four Local
Authorities, Liverpool, North East Derbyshire,
Runnymede, and York have published their draft Local
Plans. In Basildon, Bolsover, Brentwood, Calderdale,
Eastleigh, Mansfield, St Albans whilst I have not been
persuaded that there are exceptional circumstances to
justify the failure to get a plan in place, I note some
progress has been made to get their plans in place and at
this time do not consider that intervention would have the
greatest impact in accelerating their plan production. We
will monitor these areas closely and any further
significant delays in meeting their published timetables
will inevitably give rise to considerable doubt over the
ability of these authorities to make the necessary progress
on their local plans. If there are further significant delays I
will reconsider my decision not to intervene. In
Northumberland I am asking the Council to produce a
clearer timetable and to accelerate plan production.
In three areas, Castle Point, Thanet and Wirral, I am
now particularly concerned at the consistent failure and
lack of progress to get a plan in place and have not been
persuaded by the exceptional circumstances set out by the
Council or the proposals they have put forward to get a
plan in place. We will therefore step up the intervention
process in these three areas. I will be sending in a team of
planning experts, led by the Government’s Chief Planner,
into these three areas to advise me on the next steps in my
intervention.
I have a number of intervention options available to me
which I will now actively examine. As it may prove
necessary to take over plan production, subject to
decisions taken after the expert advice I have
commissioned, my Department has started the
procurement process to secure planning consultants and
specialists to undertake that work so it can commence as
quickly as possible. My Department will also be speaking
to the County Councils and Combined authority with a
view to inviting those bodies to prepare the local plan in
these three areas as well as exploring the possibility with
neighbouring authorities of directing the preparation of
joint plans.
Maritime and Coastguard Agency Business
Plan 2018-19
[HLWS564]
Baroness Sugg: My Honourable Friend, the
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport
(Nusrat Ghani) has made the following Ministerial
Statement.
I am proud to announce the publication of the Maritime
and Coastguard Agency’s (MCA) business plan for 2018-
19. The MCA does vital work to save lives at sea,
regulate ship standards and protect the marine
environment. The Agency affects not just those working
on the coast or at sea, it upholds the legacy of our great
maritime nation.
The business plan sets out:
i) the services that the agency will deliver and any
significant changes it plans to make;
ii) the resources the agency requires; and
iii) the key performance indicators, by which its
performance will be assessed.
This plan allows service users and members of the
public to assess how the agency is performing in
operating its key services, managing reforms and the
agency finances.
Page 4 26 March 2018 Written Statements
The business plan will be available electronically on
GOV.UK and copies will be placed in the libraries of both
houses.
Motoring Agency Business Plans 2018-19
[HLWS563]
Baroness Sugg: My Honourable Friend, the
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport
(Jesse Norman), has made the following Ministerial
Statement.
I am pleased to announce the publication of the 2018-19
business plans for the Department for Transport’s
Motoring Agencies - the Driver and Vehicle Licensing
Agency (DVLA), the Driver and Vehicle Standards
Agency (DVSA) and the Vehicle Certification Agency
(VCA).
The business plans set out:
1) the services each agency will deliver and any
significant changes they plan to make;
2) the resources they require; and,
3) the key performance indicators, by which their
performance will be assessed.
These plans allow service users and members of the
public to assess how the agencies are performing in
operating their key services, managing reforms and the
agency finances.
The business plans will be available electronically on
GOV.UK and copies will be placed in the libraries of both
Houses.
Written Answers 26 March 2018 Page 5
Written Answers Monday, 26 March 2018
Air Pollution: Brighton
Asked by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
To ask Her Majesty's Government why the national
monitor for air pollution in the Brighton and Hove area
is placed in Preston Park, rather than near the more
polluting city centre roads; and whether they will
consider using the data collected by Brighton and Hove
City Council when assessing pollution levels in the area
in future. [HL6245]
Lord Gardiner of Kimble: The Preston Park
monitoring site was chosen to measure background
pollution concentrations within reporting zone 10
(Brighton, Worthing and Littlehampton) and is sited in
accordance with EU requirements for compliance
purposes.
Defra uses pollution data from this monitoring site to
report compliance to the EU against the air quality limit
values. Monitoring data is supplemented by national
modelling which ‘fills the gaps’ between monitoring
stations.
Data collected by Brighton and Hove Council will not
be used for compliance purposes, as it does not meet the
strict requirements of the air quality directive. The data is
used to measure progress for local air quality management
purposes and supports the actions Brighton and Hove
Council is taking to reduce emissions and improve air
quality.
Alcoholic Drinks: Misuse
Asked by Lord Chadlington
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment
they have made of (1) the extent to which people aged
55 or over are increasingly experiencing harm caused
by alcohol, and (2) the need to introduce a different
intervention strategy to address the needs of those
people. [HL6227]
Lord O'Shaughnessy: Data on those experiencing
alcohol harm, broken down by age, is not collected
centrally. However, national estimates of the number of
alcohol dependent adults in 2014-15 were published by
the University of Sheffield in March 2017. They
estimated that the number of adults aged 55 or over
dependent on alcohol was 73,280.
The Government has no plans to introduce a different
intervention strategy aimed at older people. Local
authorities are responsible for commissioning effective
drug and alcohol prevention and treatment services based
on an assessment of local need. Public Health England
(PHE) supports local authorities in this work, by
providing bespoke data, value for money tools, topical
briefings, and advice on good practice to help local
authorities meet the needs of their local population,
including older people.
PHE is engaged in a series of work programmes which
aim to reduce the incidence of substance addiction and
help provide support to older people, such as advocating
the national roll out of an alcohol misuse screening
question that has been part of the NHS Health Check
since 2013. The NHS Health Check is offered to around
three million 40-74 year olds per year.
In addition, the United Kingdom Chief Medical
Officers have produced new low risk drinking guidelines
which provide the public with the latest information about
the health risks of different levels and patterns of
drinking. The guidelines enable people to make informed
choices about their drinking. The UK Chief Medical
Officers’ Low Risk Drinking Guidelines are attached.
The Answer includes the following attached material:
UK Chief Medical Officers Low Drinking Guidelines
[UK_CMOs__report.pdf]
The material can be viewed online at:
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Lords/2018-03-12/HL6227
Asylum
Asked by Lord Roberts of Llandudno
To ask Her Majesty's Government which local
authorities have accepted asylum seekers in each of the
last five years. [HL6264]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: I refer the noble Lord
to the response I gave to him on 24 January 2018, UIN
HL5042.
Asked by Lord Roberts of Llandudno
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment
they have made of the number of qualified staff
required to ensure that asylum seekers' claims are
properly assessed; and how many qualified staff are
currently employed to make such assessments.
[HL6268]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: The Home Office
currently has a published service standard to make an
asylum decision on 98% of straightforward claims within
6 months of the date of the claim being lodged.
The Home Office has rolling recruitment campaigns to
maintain the number of Decision Makers at levels which
allow cases to be progressed in line with service
standards.
Asylum: Appeals
Asked by Lord Roberts of Llandudno
To ask Her Majesty's Government what percentage of
asylum appeals were successful in each of the years
2005 to 2015. [HL6263]
Page 6 26 March 2018 Written Answers
Baroness Williams of Trafford: The Home Office
publishes data on the number of Asylum appeal
applications and determinations, in the quarterly
Immigration Statistics release. The latest figures are
available at the following link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-
statistics-october-to-december-2017-data-tables.
Table as_14 in the Asylum tables (volume 4) contains
annual breakdowns of the number of appeals; figures for
the years 2007 to 2017 are available.
Data prior to 2007 can be found in the national
archives:
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/2011021814
3229/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hosbarchive.html
Year % allowed appeals
2005 17%
2006 22%
2007 22%
2008 23%
2009 29%
2010 27%
2011 26%
2012 27%
2013 25%
2014 28%
2015 35%
2016 40%
2017 35%
Asylum: Calais
Asked by Lord Roberts of Llandudno
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they
intend to establish an asylum processing centre in
Calais. [HL6267]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: The UK has a strong
track record of cooperating with France to manage illegal
migration and to protect our shared border. However, the
primary responsibility for asylum seekers lies with the
authorities of the Member State in which they are present;
the UK Government does not have the authority to
operate on the territory of another sovereign state without
permission. We are also under no obligation to consider
asylum claims lodged outside UK territory.
As part of the Sandhurst Treaty, signed between the UK
and France on 18 January 2018, both parties agreed to
further enhance cooperation in a number of areas,
including illegal migration and asylum. This includes a
number of measures in respect of unaccompanied asylum-
seeking and children, and a commitment to support
France in its provision of accommodation facilities
located outside the Calais and Dunkirk areas. Further
information on the treaty can be found here:
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-
questions-answers-statements/written-
statement/Commons/2018-01-19/HCWS415/.
Asylum: Interviews
Asked by Lord Roberts of Llandudno
To ask Her Majesty's Government what support they
provide to asylum seekers to ensure that those
individuals can travel to their immigration interviews.
[HL6265]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: Asylum seekers who
are supported by the Home Office under Section 95 or
Section 98 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 may
apply for travel tickets when they need to travel to certain
appointments. For those required to attend a substantive
asylum interview travel tickets are normally sent to the
asylum seeker with details of the interview.
Asylum: Pregnancy
Asked by Lord Roberts of Llandudno
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will
consider extending the period during which pregnant
asylum seekers cannot be moved before their due date
from six to 12 weeks. [HL6321]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: Asylum seekers who
are destitute and have an immediate need for
accommodation can apply to be admitted to an initial
accommodation centre. In normal circumstances, they
remain in the centre for only such time as it takes to
arrange longer term “dispersal” accommodation.
If, however, the asylum seeker is heavily pregnant the
move to the dispersal accommodation is usually deferred
until around 6 weeks after the birth of the child or until
the clinician has signed off the postnatal checks.
There are no plans to change these arrangements.
Average Earnings
Asked by Baroness Primarolo
To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the
percentage change in average earnings between (1)
1987 and 1992, (2) 1992 and 1997, (3) 1998 and 2003,
and (4) 2004 and 2009. [HL6310]
Lord Young of Cookham: The information requested
falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics
Authority. I have asked the Authority to reply.
Letter from John Pullinger CB, National Statistician, to
Baroness Primarolo, dated 20 March 2018
Dear Baroness Primarolo,
As National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK
Statistics Authority, I am replying to your Parliamentary
Written Answers 26 March 2018 Page 7
Question asking what was the percentage change in
average earnings between (1) 1987 and 1992, (2) 1992
and 1997, (3) 1998 and 2003, and (4) 2004 and 2009
(HL6310 ).
Table 1 provides estimates of median gross weekly
earnings for adult full time employees in Great Britain for
April each year. The estimates from 1997 onwards are
drawn from the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings
and prior to that from its predecessor, the New Earnings
Survey. Although the methodologies between the two
surveys created some discontinuities in the published
results, the differences are tolerable and the resulting
series will be of benefit to those interested in changes in
earnings statistics over a long period.
Table 1: Median gross weekly earnings, full time
employees in Great Britain whose pay was unaffected
during the reference period [1], [2], [3], [4]
Median gross weekly earnings,
April of each years
Percentage change in gross weekly
earnings between the two quoted years
1987 - £175.1 1992 - £264.6 51.1%
1992 - £264.6 1997 - £321.5 21.5%
1998 - £335.8 2003 - £405.2 20.7%
2004 - £420.3 2009 - £489.9 16.6%
Yours sincerely,
John Pullinger
[1] Estimates prior to 1997 are drawn from the New Earnings Survey
[2] From 2004 there was improved coverage added to the Annual Survey for Hours and Earnings. This had some impact on estimates: the
median gross weekly earnings estimate for 2004 excluding that
improved coverage was £424.2 (compared with £420.3 including it).
[3] Estimates in Table 1 are drawn from:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/ear
ningsandworkinghours/adhocs/006302annualsurveyofhoursandearningsashetimeseriesofmediangrossweeklyearningsfrom1968to2016
[4] Percentage changes are calculated from the median gross weekly
earnings figures in the table, which are rounded to one decimal place. This may result in percentage changes being under or overstated, by up
to one decimal % point.
Borders: Northern Ireland
Asked by Lord Taylor of Warwick
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment
they have made of the comments by Donald Tusk that
the Irish border issue must be addressed before the
Brexit negotiations can address other issues; and
whether this will affect the progress of the negotiations.
[HL6274]
Lord Callanan: The Prime Minister reaffirmed her
commitments to the Northern Ireland and Ireland border
in her speech at Mansion House, recognising the unique
circumstances in Northern Ireland, and our shared
commitments to avoiding a hard border.
The UK and the EU negotiating teams reached another
important milestone in the Brexit process by agreeing the
terms of a time-limited implementation period.
Significant progress has also been made to turn the Joint
Report from December into the legal text of the
Withdrawal Agreement, which we will conclude in full by
October.
The negotiating teams remain committed to the Joint
Report in its entirety including guaranteeing the future
integrity of the United Kingdom’s internal market. In this
context, we are agreed on the need to include a legally
operative version of the "backstop" solution for the border
between Northern Ireland and Ireland in the Withdrawal
Agreement that is acceptable to both sides while
continuing to work up the other options.
The UK has always seen Northern Ireland issues as a
key priority for the UK Government and we remain
firmly committed to that objective. We have always been
clear from the outset that the best way to achieve this is
through the overall relationship between the UK and the
EU.
Brexit
Asked by Viscount Waverley
To ask Her Majesty's Government how much time
they expect there will be between the publication of the
final Brexit agreement and the vote in the House of
Commons. [HL6473]
Asked by Viscount Waverley
To ask Her Majesty's Government when they intend
to present the final Brexit agreement to select
committees of Parliament; and how long they expect
that to be before a vote in either House of Parliament.
[HL6474]
Asked by Viscount Waverley
To ask Her Majesty's Government how much time
they expect there will be between the vote in the House
of Commons on the Brexit agreement and exit day.
[HL6475]
Lord Callanan: It is our intention to conclude the
Withdrawal Agreement and the terms for our future
relationship in good time before we leave the EU in
March 2019. It remains our shared aim with the EU to
reach agreement on the Withdrawal Agreement by
October. This would allow both the UK Parliament and
the European Parliament time to scrutinise and debate the
agreement reached between both sides. We expect and
intend that the vote will take place before the European
Parliament debates and votes on the final agreement.
Asked by Viscount Waverley
To ask Her Majesty's Government how the resolution
presented to the House on the final Brexit agreement
will be worded. [HL6477]
Lord Callanan: The Government has committed to
hold a vote on the final deal in Parliament as soon as
possible after the negotiations have concluded. This vote
Page 8 26 March 2018 Written Answers
will take the form of a resolution in both Houses of
Parliament and will cover both the Withdrawal
Agreement and the terms for our future relationship. We
have been clear that Parliament will be able to vote to
accept the deal, or move forward without one.
The exact wording of any motion is yet to be
determined.
Asked by Lord Pearson of Rannoch
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the
Written Answer by Lord Callanan on 20 February
(HL5494), whether they will now answer the question
asked, namely whether, prior to the Prime Minister’s
letter of 29 March 2017 notifying the European
Council, in accordance with Article 50(2) of the Treaty
on European Union, of the UK’s intention to withdraw
from the EU, they gave any consideration to the
possibility of withdrawing from the EU in accordance
with Article 50(1) without being bound by Articles
50(2) and 50(3); and if not, why not. [HL6551]
Lord Callanan: As stated in the answer to HL5494, the
UK is a law abiding country and remains a Member State,
with full rights and obligations under the Treaties. We do
not want or expect to leave without a deal. Negotiating
and concluding a Withdrawal Agreement with the EU is
in the interests of both sides.
Burma: Arms Trade
Asked by Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead
To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are
taking, if any, to build international support for a UN
mandated global arms embargo against Burma.
[HL6253]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: Regardless of broader
international support, a UN arms embargo would require
majority support in the Security Council and the absence
of a veto from any Permanent Members. It is our
assessment that there is insufficient support among
Permanent Members for such a measure at this time.
Asked by Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead
To ask Her Majesty's Government what discussions
they have had with other EU governments on
expanding the EU arms embargo to cover the sale of all
equipment to the military in Burma. [HL6255]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: The UK continues to
support and comply with the EU arms embargo, which
prohibits the supply of equipment or the provision of any
training that might strengthen the Burmese military's
combat capability. At the EU Foreign Affairs Council on
26 February Council conclusions were adopted on Burma.
The UK was instrumental in securing agreement that the
embargo should be renewed and strengthened.
Burma: International Criminal Court
Asked by Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead
To ask Her Majesty's Government what discussions
they have had with other members of the UN Security
Council regarding support, in principle, for a referral of
the situation in Burma to the International Criminal
Court. [HL6254]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: We will work to ensure
the UN Security Council remains focused on the
Rohingya crisis and will consider how best to use the
various tools, including resolutions, at the Council's
disposal. This involves regular discussions with all
Security Council members. There is no consensus within
the UN Security Council at this time to refer Burma to the
International Criminal Court.
Bus Services: Brighton
Asked by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will
reconsider the rejection of a grant application to deliver
buses with lower emissions in Brighton and Hove,
given that City Council’s evidence of high
concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and airborne fine
particles in the city centre. [HL6246]
Baroness Sugg: The Government recently announced
the allocation of £40m from the Clean Bus Technology
Fund and does not plan to reconsider that decision. As the
volume of bids received exceeded the available budget we
had to prioritise those projects expected to make the
greatest contribution to bringing local NO2 concentrations
within statutory limits within the shortest possible time.
Channel Four Television: Location
Asked by Lord Storey
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the
decision to establish a second headquarters for Channel
Four outside London was taken solely by the
broadcaster; if not, what input Government ministers
and officials had into that decision; whether Channel
Four will be solely responsible for the decision where to
establish that new headquarters; and if not, whether that
decision must be signed off by a minister, and by
whom. [HL6331]
Lord Ashton of Hyde: The government has long been
committed to Channel 4 moving outside of London, and
has worked closely with Channel 4 to find a solution that
worked for Channel 4 and the country that owns it.
Channel 4's proposal was put forward by Channel 4, and
will be implemented by Channel 4. Channel 4 will launch
a process in April in which cities and regions across the
UK can pitch to become the home of Channel 4's new
National HQ and creative hubs. The decision on location
will be taken by Channel 4 not by government, and
Channel 4 has said it will take this decision in Q3 2018.
Written Answers 26 March 2018 Page 9
Asked by Lord Storey
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment
they have made of the opportunity arising from the
establishment by Channel Four of a second
headquarters outside London to develop their regional
policy and to promote less affluent parts of the UK; and
what discussions they have had with Channel Four in
this regard. [HL6332]
Lord Ashton of Hyde: We are committed to spreading
jobs, prosperity and opportunity around the UK, and
Channel 4, as a publicly-owned public service
broadcaster, can play an important part in this. The
government commissioned external economic analysis
which found that there could be significant regional
economic benefits from Channel 4 relocating staff and
moving spending out of London. The government
welcomes Channel 4's agreement to increase its regional
impact, and in doing so it will better reflect and provide
for the country that owns it.
Crimes against Humanity: Prosecutions
Asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to
the Written Answer by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon on
9 March (HL5861), how many years elapsed between
the atrocities committed by Ratko Mladić and his
conviction; and what assessment they have made of the
options for introducing more expeditious and timely
ways of bring to justice those who perpetrate genocide
or crimes against humanity. [HL6219]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: After 16 years as a
fugitive from justice, Ratko Mladić was arrested in May
2011 for crimes committed in Bosnia and Herzegovina
from 1992 until 1995. His trial commenced a year later
and considered testimony from almost 600 witnesses and
just under 10,000 exhibits. He was convicted and
sentenced to life in prison for genocide, crimes against
humanity and violations of the laws or customs of war in
November 2017, six and a half years after his arrest. We
agree that justice should be dispensed as expeditiously as
possible while ensuring defendants' receive a fair trial.
The UK participates in regular meetings of the Security
Council's Informal Working Group on International
Tribunals, which deals with a range of issues relating to
the functioning of the UN Tribunals, including
considering evaluation reports, exchanging views with
Tribunal Principals and reviewing potential efficiencies in
the operation of the Tribunals.
Devolution
Asked by Lord Taylor of Warwick
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment
they have made of how the competences currently held
at the EU level will be distributed between the various
countries in the UK after Brexit; and what impact this
will have on the management of the devolution
settlement and on relations between those countries.
[HL6275]
Lord Young of Cookham: The Government has
committed that EU exit will result in a significant increase
in the decision making powers of each of the devolved
legislatures. The Government’s provisional frameworks
analysis, published on 9 March, sets out where
frameworks may and may not be needed in respect of the
153 policy areas where EU law intersects with devolved
competence. It indicates that legislative frameworks will
only be needed in a minority of areas. Moreover, our
ongoing discussions with the devolved administrations
suggest that within these areas, legislation may only be
required in relation to specific elements, rather than the
entire policy area. Constructive discussions with the
devolved administrations continue.
Doctors and Nurses: Disciplinary
Proceedings
Asked by Lord Dobbs
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many doctors
employed by the NHS were (1) suspended for, and (2)
convicted of, malpractice, in each year between 2007
and 2017. [HL6230]
Asked by Lord Dobbs
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many nurses
employed by the NHS were (1) suspended for, and (2)
convicted of, malpractice, in each year between 2007
and 2017. [HL6231]
Lord O'Shaughnessy: The information is not available
in the format requested. NHS Digital publishes data on
dismissals under reasons for leaving. These include
capability, conduct, statutory and for some other
substantial reason. However, NHS Digital does not
specifically record data on convictions or suspensions as a
result of malpractice.
Europol
Asked by Lord Taylor of Warwick
To ask Her Majesty's Government what consideration
they have given to the comments by the Executive
Director of Europol that the UK will face
“impediments” to receiving high-quality information
after Brexit; and how they will ensure that high levels
of cooperation with EU law enforcement are
maintained. [HL6273]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: The Government’s
future partnership paper on security, law enforcement and
criminal justice published on 18 September 2017 set out
how the UK is seeking a future relationship with the EU
and its Member States that provides for practical
operational cooperation; facilitates data driven law
enforcement; and supports multilateral cooperation
through EU agencies.
Page 10 26 March 2018 Written Answers
We continue to value our cooperation and information
sharing through measures such as the European Arrest
Warrant (EAW), Europol, the European Criminal Record
Information System (ECRIS) and the Schengen
Information System (SIS II) in our efforts to fight cross-
border crime and terrorism.
The UK has been instrumental in developing the tools
which the EU now has at its disposal and in working
together with international partners on these issues. We
want this to continue in a way that works for the UK and
for Europe.
We are confident that continued, practical cooperation
between the UK and EU on law enforcement and security
is in the interests of both sides. This includes cooperation
through Europol, and is consistent with the Europol
Executive Director’s observation that the UK is in the top
three Member States that contribute intelligence each day
to the different Europol databases, and exchanges five
times as much information with Europol as the US, and
seven times more than Denmark.
We therefore approach negotiations anticipating that an
agreement in this area can be reached, and agree with the
Executive Director of Europol as regards the desirability
of preserving as much operational cooperation as
possible.
First4Adoption
Asked by Lord Watson of Invergowrie
To ask Her Majesty's Government what
assessment they have made of the impact on the
statutory provision of adoption of the closure of
First4Adoption on 31 March; and how they plan to fund
adoption services thereafter. [HL6277]
Lord Agnew of Oulton: First4Adoption has operated
under the department’s National Gateway for Adoption
contract since its launch in 2012. The contract ends on 31
March 2018.
First4Adoption is an information service for
prospective adopters. The government does not expect the
contract’s end to impact the statutory provision of
adoption. The department intends to ensure that materials
developed under the contract remain accessible and free
to access so that prospective adopters can still benefit
from this information.
Local authorities, Regional Adoption Agencies (RAAs)
and Voluntary Adoption Agencies will continue to
provide further advice and information to prospective
adopters.
The government funds local authority children’s
services, including adoption, through the local
government finance settlement. In addition, the
government continues to invest in adoption through the
development of RAAs, the funding of 16 new Practice
Improvement Fund projects and the Adoption Support
Fund, which has provided more than £66 million to
support thousands of families since launching in May
2015.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Russian
Language
Asked by The Marquess of Lothian
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many fluent
Russian speakers have been trained or recruited by
the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) since
November 2016; and how many fluent Russian
speakers are employed by the FCO. [HL6307]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: Russian is a priority
language for the FCO. Where required, officers undertake
up to 14 months full time language training to reach C1
Operational level as defined in the Common European
Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), an
international standard to describe language ability. Since
November 2016 a total of 64 officers have undertaken or
are undergoing Russian language training. The FCO has
212 employees registered with some level of Russian, 83
of which have reached C1 or above (as of December
2017).
Hate Crime
Asked by Baroness Deech
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment
they have made of the strategy of the Equality and
Human Rights Commission in combating rising levels
of antisemitism and hate crime. [HL6443]
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth: The Government
deplores all forms of hate crime and is committed to
tackling it. We treat all hate crime with equal seriousness;
there is no place for treating victims differently regardless
of their race, religion, age, gender identity, sexuality or
disability.
Our response to anti-Semitism has been built on the
solid work of the Cross-Government working group on
tackling anti-Semitism which includes Jewish communal
stakeholders, ensuring that we are alive to any issues and
concerns of the Jewish community and can respond
quickly. The Government supports the Community
Security Trust (CST) to provide security for Jewish
communal buildings, as well as a range of projects to
tackle anti-Semitism on campus such as the Union of
Jewish Student's Bridges Not Boycotts programme, and
the Holocaust Educational Trust's Lessons From
Auschwitz.
In 2016, the Government published the Hate Crime
Action Plan. The Plan includes a range of actions,
including funding for security for places of worship, and
the disaggregation of religion-based hate crime data. We
have taken further action in education, equipping teachers
to have difficult conversations and funding programmes
through the Anne Frank Trust and Streetwise. The Plan
also brings together the work of a wider range of
departments and agencies, including Fire and Rescue
Services for the first time. We are now refreshing the plan
to ensure that we remain able to respond to all forms of
hatred effectively and appropriately.
Written Answers 26 March 2018 Page 11
The Equality and Human Rights Commission is an
independent public body. I have therefore asked the
Commission’s Chief Executive Officer to write to the
Hon Member with the information requested. I will place
a copy of the letter in the libraries of both Houses.
Hinkley Point C Power Station
Asked by Lord German
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the
expected total number of tons of waste material arising
from the construction of the new Hinkley Point power
station to be deposited in the Cardiff Grounds.
[HL6235]
Lord Henley: The amount of dredge material requested
by the applicant in the marine licence application is for a
maximum of 280,000 tonnes. The original figure was
higher than this, however the licence holder now requires
dredging from a smaller area.
Asked by Lord German
To ask Her Majesty's Government why Cardiff
Grounds was chosen for the deposit of waste material
arising from the construction of the new Hinkley Point
power station. [HL6236]
Lord Henley: We understand that in pre-application
discussions, it was recommended to the applicant by
English and Welsh Statutory Nature Conservation Bodies
that the sediment from the proposed dredging site should
remain within the Severn Estuary Special Area of
Conservation (SAC) so as not to affect the overall
sediment amounts of the SAC. It was decided that
disposal in the immediate vicinity of the dredge site may
adversely affect some of the SAC feature in the wider
area and so it was considered that an established disposal
site within the same estuary would be preferential. Cardiff
Grounds was chosen as the preferred site. The Licence
application was presented with this location as the
applicant’s choice and the application was assessed by the
licensing authority on this basis.
Asked by Lord German
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the precise
nature of the waste material to be removed from the
construction site for the new Hinkley Point power
station; what contaminants are expected to be found
within that material; and whether they have evidence
that that material might include irradiated material.
[HL6237]
Lord Henley: The material to be removed from the
dredge site is sediment, consisting of clay, silt, sand and
gravel. A range of chemical and radiological materials
were tested for, which included gamma emitting
radionuclides and chemicals. These tests, carried out by
an accredited laboratory, showed that the levels of
chemicals and radionuclides were within acceptable levels
under international guidelines and considered to be safe.
Asked by Lord German
To ask Her Majesty's Government when they expect
the process of depositing waste material arising from
the construction of the new Hinkley Point power station
in the Cardiff Grounds to begin. [HL6238]
Lord Henley: The dredge disposal will not commence
until permission has been granted by the licencing
authority. It is expected that work will begin summer
2018, once the permission has been granted.
Asked by Lord German
To ask Her Majesty's Government what checks will
be undertaken to ensure that no contaminated waste
material arising from the construction of the new
Hinkley Point power station will be shipped for
depositing in the Cardiff Grounds; and who will
conduct those checks. [HL6239]
Lord Henley: The sediment has been sampled and
tested for chemical and radiological substances. An
accredited laboratory, Centre for Environment, Fisheries
and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), has undertaken the
testing and analysis in accordance with international
guidelines. Permission is only granted to dispose of
material that is deemed safe according to these
internationally established guidelines.
Immigration Controls: Republic of Ireland
Asked by Lord Bowness
To ask Her Majesty's Government where non-UK
citizens travelling to the UK from the Republic of
Ireland will have their travel documents checked after
the UK leaves the EU; whether citizens of the Republic
of Ireland will be subject to the same checks; and what
effect such checks will have on (1) the Common Travel
Area, and (2) control of the UK's border. [HL6288]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: The Common Travel
Area (CTA) is an existing special travel area which
facilitates the long-standing principle of free movement
for British and Irish nationals and the enjoyment of
reciprocal rights enjoyed in the UK and Ireland.
The CTA arrangements mean there are no routine
immigration controls on journeys from Ireland to the UK,
including over the land border. The Government is
committed to maintaining these arrangements with Ireland
after the UK leaves the EU, protecting the ability to move
freely between Ireland and the UK. The December Joint
Report includes recognition from the EU that the CTA
with Ireland is protected after the UK has left the EU. As
will all the commitments made in the December Joint
Report we are determined to ensure that this is turned into
legally binding text in the Withdrawal Agreement.
Maintaining these arrangements also means the protection
of Irish citizens’ rights to enter and remain in the UK.
Immigration control is not, and never has been, solely
about the ability to prevent and control entry at the UK’s
physical border. There is a high level of collaboration
Page 12 26 March 2018 Written Answers
between the UK and Ireland on border security, with a
joint programme of work focused on strengthening the
external border of the CTA.
Immigration Officers
Asked by Lord Roberts of Llandudno
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many staff
were employed as immigration officers on 1 May in (1)
2006, (2) 2012, and (3) 2016. [HL6266]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: Security of the border
cannot be measured by numbers of staff. Border Force
uses a sophisticated combination of experienced officers,
intelligence, data, technology and partnership working.
People employed in Border Force for 2012 and 2016
can be found in the Annual Report and Accounts, links to
which are shown below. Border Force was established in
its current form in March 2012 and since that time the
workforce has ranged from approximately 7800 – 8100 in
full-time equivalents.
16-17 Page 66 -
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/
attachment_data/file/627853/ho_annual_report_and_acco
unts_2016_2017.pdf
12-13 Page 125 -
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/
attachment_data/file/210660/Annual_Report_and_A
The ‘Comparative’ figures in the table for 2012/13 and
2013/14 do not include IT and Estates budgets, which
were included in previously released figures. The IT and
Estates budgets were taken under central Home Office
control after 2013/14.
The figures are not available for 2006 UKBA staffing
or Immigration staffing as in 2006 Home Office HQ and
UKBA employment statistics were reported as one figure.
The Answer includes the following attached material:
Annual Report
[Annual_Report_and_Accounts_FINAL_updated_logo.pdf]
HO Annual Report and Accounts 2016-17
[ho_annual_report_and_accounts_2016_2017.pdf]
The material can be viewed online at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-
answers-statements/written-question/Lords/2018-03-12/HL6266
India: Religious Freedom
Asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment
they have made of (1) reported restrictions on the
ability to celebrate Christian holidays in India, and (2)
the diminution of religious freedom in India; and what
representations they have made to the government of
India on those matters. [HL6283]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: India has a strong
democratic framework, which guarantees human rights
within its constitution. However, it also faces numerous
challenges relating to its size, social and economic
development.
The British Government remains committed to
promoting and defending freedom of religion or belief
(FoRB) for Christians, and indeed individuals of all faiths
or beliefs, and to support this we engage with the Indian
government to build capacity and share expertise to tackle
challenges, including the promotion and protection of
human rights. Our High Commission in New Delhi, our
network of Deputy High Commissions, as well as Foreign
and Commonwealth Office officials in London, maintain
a continuous assessment of the human rights situation
across India, including with civil society groups in India.
Officials regularly meet with minority representatives to
discuss minority issues and freedom of religious belief.
More widely our project work has benefited a variety of
minority groups in India, including promoting minority
rights.
Local Government: Buckinghamshire
Asked by Lord Kennedy of Southwark
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the
timescale for the proposed changes to local government
structures in Buckinghamshire. [HL6407]
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth: In his written statement
(HCWS535) the Secretary of State explained that before
he takes his final decision on the Buckinghamshire
unitary proposals, there is a period until 25 May 2018
during which those interested may make further
representations. Thereafter having regard to all relevant
information then available to him, he intends as soon as
practicable to take his final decision, and if that decision
is to implement one of the proposals, to seek
Parliamentary approval to the necessary secondary
legislation. If Parliament were to approve any such
legislation, the expectation is that the earliest any new
unitary authorities could be established is April 2020.
Local Government: Northamptonshire
Asked by Lord Kennedy of Southwark
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they
intend to take any steps to reorganise local government
in Northamptonshire. [HL6366]
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth: The Secretary of State
is now considering the report of the independent
inspection of Northamptonshire County Council,
including the proposals it makes for the future of local
government in Northamptonshire. He has undertaken to
make a statement in due course in the Other Place setting
out his proposals for next steps.
Mental Health Services: Homelessness
Asked by Lord Bird
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the
Written Answer by Lord O'Shaughnessy on 18
December 2017 (HL3813), what assessment, if any,
Written Answers 26 March 2018 Page 13
they have made of the impact of cuts by clinical
commissioning groups to homeless and rough sleeping
mental health teams, including the decision by Camden
NHS Clinical Commissioning Group to reduce its
financial support for the Focus Homeless Outreach.
[HL6222]
Lord O'Shaughnessy: The Department has not made
any such assessment. It is the responsibility of
commissioners and health and wellbeing boards to ensure
services meet local need as part of the Joint Service Needs
Assessments.
The Government has set an aim to halve rough sleeping
by 2022 and eliminate it entirely by 2027. The
Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 introduces new duties
for specified public services, including the National
Health Service, to refer service users they consider may
be homeless or threatened with homelessness to a local
housing authority.
Muslim Council of Britain
Asked by Lord Blencathra
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the
Written Answer by Baroness Williams of Trafford on
12 March (HL6001), who were the representatives from
the Muslim Council of Britain who attended the most
recent meeting with Home Office officials. [HL6285]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: Pursuant to our
Written Answer of 12 March (HL6001), the Government
will not comment on the private meetings it holds or the
participants of these meetings.
Nuclear Weapons: Treaties
Asked by Lord Judd
To ask Her Majesty's Government what discussions
they have had with the government of the United States
on (1) extending or negotiating a successor treaty to
New START, and (2) attempting to resolve existing
disputes with Russia over the Intermediate-range
Nuclear Force Treaty. [HL6252]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: Ministers and senior
officials discuss nuclear issues often with US
counterparts. The US set out in the Nuclear Posture
Review published on 1 February its continuing
commitment to implement New START. We support
dialogue between the US and other signatories about the
possibility of extending the Treaty. The Intermediate-
range Nuclear Force Treaty has made a valuable
contribution to Euro-Atlantic security for over 30 years.
We welcome US efforts to preserve the Treaty and
continue to encourage Russia to resolve the serious
concern of the UK and other NATO Allies about their
new missile systems.
Occupational Pensions
Asked by Baroness Drake
To ask Her Majesty's Government what estimate they
have made of the number of small pension savings pots
held by individuals; whether that number has increased
in the last five years and by how much; what
assessment they have made of the problems arising
from any such increase; what plans they have to address
those problems; and what assessment they have made
of the impact of that increase on workers in low paid
high turnover jobs. [HL6292]
Baroness Buscombe: So far, the Government’s
automatic enrolment (AE) programme has led to more
than 9.4 million employees being automatically enrolled
in a workplace pension, with more than 1.1 million
employers meeting their duties as of the end of February.
We do not routinely collect data on the number or size of
individuals’ pension pots, but it is clear that many of these
pots will be small at this early stage. However, the
proposals announced in the 2017 Review of Automatic
Enrolment will mean pension saving starting from a
younger age, which we know makes a real difference. A
National Minimum Wage earner who starts saving from
22 could build a pot of £82,000 (in today’s earnings
terms) by state pension age. Had they started saving at 18,
that pot could be £92,000 (12 per cent larger). We will
keep the issue of small pots under review now that the
roll-out of AE is almost complete.
As of March 2017, 94 per cent of eligible jobholders
automatically enrolled in an occupational defined
contribution scheme were enrolled in a Master Trust. The
authorisation and supervision regime introduced by the
Pension Schemes Act 2017 will ensure that members of
Master Trust schemes, who will often have small pension
pots, have equivalent protection to people saving in other
types of pension schemes.
Dormant pots can be eroded over time by costs and
charges, and the smaller the dormant pot, the greater the
impact. Members have the right to know all the costs and
charges they are paying. The Government consulted last
year on regulations requiring charges and transaction
costs to be given to defined contribution occupational
pension scheme members and to be published. We laid
regulations to achieve this on 26 February, and they will
come into force on 6 April. The Financial Conduct
Authority plan to consult on corresponding rules for
workplace personal pension schemes in the second
quarter of this year.
Members could also benefit from the introduction of the
pensions dashboard, which should make it easier to see all
their pots in one place when they choose to do so. This
would enable them to feel in control and take ownership
of their pensions. We are currently conducting a
feasibility study looking at how we can make the pensions
dashboard a reality, and will publish our findings later in
the spring.
Page 14 26 March 2018 Written Answers
Patients: Death
Asked by Lord Dobbs
To ask Her Majesty's Government how
many avoidable deaths occurred in NHS hospitals in
each year between 2007 and 2017. [HL6233]
Lord O'Shaughnessy: This information is not
collected centrally. However, in 2017-18, the National
Health Service became the first healthcare system to
publish estimates by individual trusts of how many of
their patients may have died because of problems in their
care. Trusts have begun to publish their estimates on a
quarterly basis and must include evidence of learning and
improvements made to prevent such deaths in their
Quality Accounts from June 2018. This new level of
transparency is fundamentally about generating learning
to ensure the safety of NHS services.
Pupils: Walking
Asked by Lord Lucas
To ask Her Majesty's Government which primary
schools have used their PE and Sport Premium to
successfully encourage substantially more children to
walk to school. [HL6256]
Lord Agnew of Oulton: The information requested is
not held centrally.
Through the primary PE and sport premium, the
government has invested over £600 million of cross-
government ring-fenced funding direct to primary schools
to be spent on the improvement of PE and sport for all
pupils. The government has doubled the premium to £320
million a year from September 2017 using revenue from
the Soft Drinks Industry Levy. Head teachers have the
freedom to decide how the funding should best be used to
improve their PE and sports. The department’s guidance
to schools on the use of the premium indicates that they
can use it to embed physical activity into the school day
through active travel to and from school. Schools need to
publish how they spend the funding and report the impact
on their website by 4 April 2018.
National Walk to School Week takes place from 21-25
May, and the department expects schools will use this
opportunity to further promote active lifestyles outside of
school.
Russia: Nuclear Weapons
Asked by Lord Judd
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment
they have made of whether Russia's threshold for the
use of nuclear weapons has been lowered, following the
speech by President Putin to the Russian Federal
Assembly on 1 March. [HL6302]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: We regret President
Putin's decision to develop new types of destabilising
nuclear weapons systems, rather than working towards
strategic stability. Russia's aggressive nuclear strategy
poses a challenge to the UK and NATO Allies, which is
why we will continue to keep our nuclear posture under
constant review. We remain confident in our ability to
deter all threats.
Russia: Sanctions
Asked by Baroness Deech
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment
they have made of the effectiveness of current EU
sanctions against Russia. [HL6290]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: The UK plays a leading
role in continuing EU sanctions against Russia to effect a
change in its Ukraine policy and end its illegal annexation
of Crimea. Sanctions have demonstrated a clear united
Western position and will remain in place until Russia
fully meets its commitments under the Minsk
Agreements. Beyond the Kremlin’s bravado, sanctions are
biting in Russia. Of Russia’s 3.7 percent overall Gross
Domestic Product decline in 2015, Citibank assess
sanctions caused nearly 0.4 percent. Financial sanctions
are particularly effective, making it expensive and hard
for Russia to secure western finance.
Slaughterhouses
Asked by Baroness Byford
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many small
and medium-sized abattoirs were in operation in the UK
in each year from 2001 to 2017. [HL6224]
Lord Gardiner of Kimble: For each year between
2001 and 2017 the number of small and medium sized
abattoirs fell. The data provided only covers Great Britain
which account for the majority of abattoirs.
Abattoir numbers by size in Great Britain
Small Medium Large Total Total
Small and
medium
2001 264 199 32 495 463
2002 249 189 33 471 438
2003 253 178 35 466 431
2004 241 176 35 452 417
2005 231 166 34 431 397
2006 217 154 39 410 371
2007 209 146 37 392 355
2008 199 139 41 379 338
2009 208 126 37 371 334
2010 199 126 35 360 325
2011 192 123 40 355 315
2012 192 126 36 354 318
2013 188 120 36 344 308
Written Answers 26 March 2018 Page 15
Small Medium Large Total Total
Small and
medium
2014 176 117 39 332 293
2015 174 115 38 327 289
2016 182 110 39 331 292
2017 174 102 44 320 276
Source: Food Standards Agency
The data was sourced from the Food Standards Agency.
The number of abattoirs in Scotland and Northern Ireland
are held by Food Standards Scotland and the Food
Standards Agency Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland do
not hold data prior to 2008 so the figures provided are just
for Great Britain.
Sri Lanka: Religious Freedom
Asked by The Lord Bishop of Coventry
To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are
taking to safeguard religious pluralism and to defend
and promote freedom of religion or belief in Sri Lanka.
[HL6228]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: We are currently
funding a range of projects through a multi-year Conflict
Stability and Security Fund programme to promote inter-
faith and inter-communal dialogue and dispute resolution
at local level in eastern Sri Lanka, one of the most diverse
regions. Our High Commission regularly raise issues of
concern with their Sri Lankan counterparts.
Asked by The Lord Bishop of Coventry
To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are
taking to work with the government of Sri Lanka to
ensure that (1) a thorough investigation is conducted
into the recent communal violence between Buddhist
nationalists and the Muslim community in Digana and
Teldeniya, in Kandy administrative district, Sri Lanka,
and (2) the perpetrators are bought to justice. [HL6229]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: I am concerned by the
recent inter-communal violence in Sri Lanka and the
Minister for Asia and the Pacific, the Rt Hon Mark Field
MP, wrote to his counter-part Foreign Minister Marapana
on 7 March setting out UK views. We support the
Government of Sri Lanka's action in swiftly bringing the
violence to an end and urge it to hold the perpetrators to
account. It is vital that all leaders in Sri Lanka condemn
violence and hate, and make every effort to promote
harmony.
Undocumented Migrants: Commonwealth
Asked by Lord Ouseley
To ask Her Majesty's Government what
representations they have received, including those
from Commonwealth Caribbean countries, about
children who arrived and settled in the UK before 1971
as British subjects on their parents' passports but are
now being deported as undocumented illegal
Commonwealth Caribbean migrants; and what were
their responses. [HL6257]
Asked by Lord Ouseley
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their
estimate of the number of people born in a
Commonwealth country who have settled in the UK,
having arrived before 1971, and are now vulnerable to
deportation as they have never regularised their status
as UK citizens. [HL6258]
Asked by Lord Ouseley
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many
undocumented Commonwealth immigrants who were
settled in the UK before 1971 have been deported in the
past 24 months; and to which countries. [HL6259]
Asked by Lord Ouseley
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment
they have made of the impact of deportation on the
lives of those deported residents who settled in the UK
before 1971 but now find themselves effectively
stateless. [HL6260]
Asked by Lord Ouseley
To ask Her Majesty's Government what are the
differences in processes to consider (1) undocumented
Commonwealth Caribbean migrants settled in the UK
before 1971 for removal, and (2) EU citizens seeking
permanent residence in the UK. [HL6261]
Asked by Lord Ouseley
To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are
taking to assist undocumented Commonwealth
Caribbean migrants who settled in Britain before 1971,
having arrived as British subjects on their parents'
passports, to regularise their status as British citizens.
[HL6262]
Baroness Williams of Trafford: Different legislation
applies to those who were settled in the UK prior to 1 st
January 1973 – when the Immigration Act 1971 came in
to force - and EU citizens seeking confirmation of
permanent residence. Under the EU Free Movement
Directive, EU citizens and their family members
automatically attain permanent residence having
exercised free movement rights for a continuous period of
five years in the UK. If they wish to document this they
can apply for a permanent residence document.
A non-EU national with settled status, including those
settled here on 1 January 1973, is able to apply for this to
be confirmed in a biometric residence permit. To do so
they must be able to show they have acquired settled
status and that they have continued to reside in the UK so
as not to lose that status.
No estimate has been made of how many of those who
arrived prior to the 1971 Act’s commencement are unable
Page 16 26 March 2018 Written Answers
to evidence their status in the UK. However, the majority
of people making such applications are able to provide the
documentation required to demonstrate their legal status
in the UK. Where someone struggles to provide
documents, efforts are made to assist them to demonstrate
their continued residence, such as working with other
government departments to establish this. We have not
received any official representations from Commonwealth
countries about their citizens who claim to be settled
under the 1971 Act but have been subject to removal
action.
We expect those with no legal right to remain here to
leave and we provide a number of assistance programmes
to support them to return. We will seek to enforce the
return of anyone with no right to remain who refuses to
leave voluntarily. However, we do operate a stateless
leave policy for those who are unable to return to their
country of former habitual residence because they are
stateless and have no right to reside in any other country.
The Home Office publishes data on returns by
destination as part of the quarterly Immigration statistics
release. The data does not break these down by the date
an individual claims to have arrived the UK.
USA: Nuclear Weapons
Asked by Lord Judd
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their
assessment of the statement by the German Minister for
Foreign Affairs, Sigmar Gabriel, that the "US
administration decision to develop new tactical nuclear
weapons shows that the spiral of a new nuclear arms
race has already been set in motion". [HL6249]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: This is not our analysis.
The US Nuclear Posture Review, published on 1
February, makes clear that the US has continued to reduce
the number and salience of nuclear weapons, while others,
including Russia and China, have moved in the opposite
direction. The Review also makes clear that US decisions
to modify a small number of existing warheads to provide
a low yield option and, in the longer term, to pursue a new
sea-launched cruise missile, are intended to enhance
deterrence and to counter any perception of an exploitable
gap in US capabilities.
Asked by Lord Judd
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their
assessment of the proposal by the United States
Congress to pursue research into a new ground
launched cruise missile; and what is their assessment
of the implications of that proposal for the requirements
of the Intermediate-range Nuclear Force Treaty.
[HL6251]
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: We welcome the US
Government's desire to preserve the Intermediate-range
Nuclear Force (INF) Treaty and to encourage full
compliance by Russia. The Administration's approach is
outlined in their 'Integrated INF Strategy', published in
December 2017. Proposals by Congress are for the
Administration to consider.
Warships: Repairs and Maintenance
Asked by Lord West of Spithead
To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the average
cost of items cannibalised from (1) submarines in build,
and (2) surface ships in build, for use in operational
submarines and surface ships. [HL6340]
Earl Howe: The information is not held in the format
requested.
Weather
Asked by Lord Birt
To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they
have to review the preparedness of the UK to deal with
severe cold weather conditions. [HL6223]
Lord Young of Cookham: The Government constantly
reviews preparedness for the risks facing the UK, drawing
on the National Risk Assessment (NRA) and Resilience
Capabilities Programme (RCP). This includes
preparedness to respond to and recover from severe cold
weather. In addition, following any major event, debriefs
are undertaken by relevant Departments and agencies to
identify any lessons learned and improve future
responses. This is the case with respect to the recent
period of cold weather, where the Water Services
Regulation Authority (Ofwat) is considering the recent
water supply issue, identifying the causes of the problems
and reviewing the response of the water companies. The
results will be published by 15 June.
Index to Statements and Answers
Written Statements ................................................. 1
Energy Policy ....................................................... 1
Fire Reform .......................................................... 1
High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill:
Additional Provision ............................................. 1
Justice Update ....................................................... 2
Local Plan Intervention ........................................ 3
Maritime and Coastguard Agency Business Plan
2018-19 ................................................................. 3
Motoring Agency Business Plans 2018-19 .......... 4
Written Answers ..................................................... 5
Air Pollution: Brighton ......................................... 5
Alcoholic Drinks: Misuse ..................................... 5
Asylum ................................................................. 5
Asylum: Appeals .................................................. 5
Asylum: Calais ..................................................... 6
Asylum: Interviews .............................................. 6
Asylum: Pregnancy .............................................. 6
Average Earnings ................................................. 6
Borders: Northern Ireland ..................................... 7
Brexit .................................................................... 7
Burma: Arms Trade .............................................. 8
Burma: International Criminal Court ................... 8
Bus Services: Brighton ......................................... 8
Channel Four Television: Location ...................... 8
Crimes against Humanity: Prosecutions ............... 9
Devolution ............................................................ 9
Doctors and Nurses: Disciplinary Proceedings .... 9
Europol ................................................................. 9
First4Adoption .................................................... 10
Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Russian
Language ............................................................ 10
Hate Crime ......................................................... 10
Hinkley Point C Power Station ........................... 11
Immigration Controls: Republic of Ireland ........ 11
Immigration Officers .......................................... 12
India: Religious Freedom .................................. 12
Local Government: Buckinghamshire ............... 12
Local Government: Northamptonshire .............. 12
Mental Health Services: Homelessness ............. 12
Muslim Council of Britain ................................. 13
Nuclear Weapons: Treaties ................................ 13
Occupational Pensions ....................................... 13
Patients: Death ................................................... 14
Pupils: Walking ................................................. 14
Russia: Nuclear Weapons .................................. 14
Russia: Sanctions ............................................... 14
Slaughterhouses ................................................. 14
Sri Lanka: Religious Freedom ........................... 15
Undocumented Migrants: Commonwealth ........ 15
USA: Nuclear Weapons ..................................... 16
Warships: Repairs and Maintenance ................. 16
Weather .............................................................. 16