Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Overview of Waste Management Techniques for Fuels and Power in Europe and in the USA
L.F. Diaz, G.M. Savage, and L.L. Eggerth CalRecovery, Inc.Concord, California USA
California Biomass Collaborative 4th Annual Forum Sacramento, California (March 27-28, 2007)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
OutlineIntroduction
General Types of Technologies
OverviewEU
USA
Conclusions
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
IntroductionManagement of MSW:
has undergone substantial changes in the past 50 years
now, fractions of solid waste and biomass are viewed as important sources of fuel and energy
Focus of presentation:deals with some techniques that have been demonstrated and some that are under development in the EU and in the US
broad, expansive topic; will only provide an overview
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
General Types of TechnologiesThermal
Physical-chemical
Biological
Sources: Diaz, L.F., G.M. Savage, and C.G. Golueke, Resource Recovery from Municipal Solid Wastes, Volume II, CRC Press, Inc., 1982Bilitewski, B., et al., Waste Management, Springer, Berlin, 1994
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Thermal ProcessesCombustion
Gasification (sub-stoichiometric air)
Pyrolysis (absence of air, temp, pressure)
Plasma
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Thermal Processes (Combustion)Concentration of oxygen:
stoichiometricexcess air
Degree of treatment:mass fired:
– types of grates:travelingreciprocatingrotating drum
fluidized bed (FBC)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Thermal Processes (Gasification)Sub-stoichiometric air
Vertical fixed bed
Horizontal fixed bed
Fluidized bed
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Physical-Chemical ProcessesSeveral unit processes used to produce:
RDF/SRF
dRDF
liquid fuels
Hydrolysis (acid)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Biological ProcessesAnaerobic digestion:
in landfills
in reactors:– wet (5 to 10% dry solid matter)– dry (>30% dry solid matter)
Hydrolysis (enzymatic)
Hydrogen production
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
European UnionPrior to 2004, the EU consisted of 15 member states (EU-15)
Between 2002 and 2003, the EU-15 produced about 200 million tons of MSW
One of the most recent significant pieces of legislation regarding SWM – the Landfill Directive:
bans disposal of untreated organic materials into landfills
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Targets for Biodegradable Waste Diversion (Landfill Directive) in the EU
35%2016 (2020)50%2009 (2013)75%2006 (2010)
% of Biodegradable Waste Allowed to Landfill (% of quantities in 1995)
Target Date *
* The directive allows for a 4-year derogation for Member States that were landfilling more than 80% of the biodegradable waste in 1995
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
EU Framework Directive on Waste (75/442/EEC)
Establishment of sustainable waste management
Requirements to protect human health and the environment
Defines waste types
Principles of waste hierarchy
REDUCEREUSE
RECOVERYRecycling
COMPOSTINGWaste-to-energy
DISPOSALLandfill
Incineration
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Management of MSW in Some European Countries (2002)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Denmark
Netherlan
ds
Austria
Belgium
Sweden
France
Finlan
d
Spain
Italy
United King
dom
Portug
alGreec
e
Perc
ent o
f MSW Landfilling
Composting
Incineration
Recycling
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Type of Treatment of MSW in Europe (2004)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
WTE in the EU
50 million tons of MSW thermally treated in 420 plants produced:
- 20 million MWh of electricity
- 50 million MWh of heatIn 2005, 13 countries produced 12.7 million tons of RDF or SRF
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
filte
r
Recovery ofCl, Br, Hg,
gypsum
Inertizationdisposal(storage)
Utilization
Energyrecovery
(24 % power,
>50% CHP)low dioxin
Segregation ofpollutants
HClHBrHgSO2
Fly ash
Volume reductionand inertization
Controlledfeeding
Optimizedcombustion
control
Fundamentals of Modern Waste Incineration
Source: Vehlow, J. Germany
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Waste-to-Energy Facilities Operating in Europe in 2004
1.14Other3.1829Sweden0.5421Norway3.430Denmark0.43Czech Republic
13.8861Germany1.47Austria
4.2252Italy3.1429Switzerland5.3612Netherlands2.318Belgium2.614UK1.063Portugal1.7811Spain12130France
Treated Waste (million tonnes)No. of PlantsNation
Source: CEWEP
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Management of Boiler and Filter Ash in Europe
Extraction/sintering
Fusion/vitrification
Stabilization
Filler in asphalt (NL)
‘Utilization‘ in salt mine (D)
Storage for future use
Source: Vehlow, J., 2006
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
200 kg
FilterBoiler
Scru
bber
DEN
OX
Scru
bber
Polis
hing
MSW(1000 kg)
Bottom Ash
160kg
Utilizationin construction
20 kg metals
20 kg to disposal
15 kgfly ash
12 kgsalts
Solid Residues of MSW Incineration
Source: Vehlow, J. Germany
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
United StatesUndergone major changes in the last 50 years
Several important laws:Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Clean Air Act
Clean Water Act
Occupational Safety and Health Act
Superfund and Toxic Substances Control Act
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
United States (cont.)In 2003, generated about 240 million tons per year of MSW
Spend about US$40 billion per year to manage the wastes
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
MSW Management in the United States (2003)
Land disposal, 55.4%Recovery, 30.6%
Combustion, 14.0%
Source: US EPA
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Waste-to-Energy Facilities Operating in the US (2005)
84,20830,73889Total
1,9487059Modular
17,4836,38016RDF
64,77723,65364Mass combustion
Capacity (tons/day)
Capacity(tons/yr x 1000)
No. of Facilities
Type of Unit
Source: 2005-2006 Municipal Waste Combustion in the United States, 8th Edition, E.B. Berenyi
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Number of Waste-to-Energy Facilities in the United States (1982 to 2004)
59
103111
129
112
10092
89
75
136
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1993 1996 1998 2001 2004
Year
Num
ber o
f Fac
ilitie
s
Source: 2005-2006 Municipal Waste Combustion in the United States, 8th Edition, E.B. Berenyi
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Options for Optimizing Thermal Processes
Increase energy efficiencyReduce flow of flue gasMinimize development of polluting and toxic substances such as dioxins, CO and NOx
Reduce or avoid corrosionImprove ash management
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Current Developments in Optimization
Water-cooled grates
Recirculation of flue gas
Enrichment of primary air with oxygen
Cladding of boiler tubes
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Gasification
Discovered at outset of 19th century
Conversion of the organic fraction of waste or biomass into a mixture of combustible gases through partial oxidation at high temperatures (400 to 1500 °C)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
GasificationCarbon in waste or biomass reacts with steam and oxygen (from air) at sub-stoichiometric conditionsPrimary reactions:
C + O2 -> CO2 (exothermic)C + H2O -> CO + H2 (endothermic, water gas)C + CO2 -> 2 CO (endothermic)CO + H2O -> CO2 + H2 (exothermic, generator gas)
Resulting synthesis gas (syngas) can be used for:energy production in IC engines or turbinessynthesis of chemicalshydrogen production
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
IC Engine Firing Pyrolysis Gas
Engine and DynamometerGasifier (rt) and Gas Conditioner (lt)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Engine Cylinder and Valves After Test Run
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
IC Engine Firing Pyrolysis Gas
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Thermoselect
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Gasification as Front-end Plant
Source: Bilitewski, B., 2006
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
PyrolysisEndothermic reaction of organic fraction of waste, biomass, or liquid waste in the absence of oxygen at high temperature and pressure
Organic matter is transformed to a gas, liquid, and a solid (char)
Temperature and pressure levels affect the relative ratios of gas, liquid, and solid
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Thermal Gasification – System Schematic
PyrolysisReactor
Organic Feed
Char (e.g., carbon black)
Pyrolysis (syn) gas
Pyrolytic Oil
Heat
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
PyrolysisSeveral pilot plants have been operated
Reliability and maturity of the technology has not been demonstrated at full-scale
Major issues deal with solid residues produced, gas clean-up, quality of liquid fuel, and air emissions
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Pyrolysis (or Gasification) and Melting System in Japan
Gasification
Melting
Slag
Source:Matsuto, T
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Slag and Metal in Japan
About 150 melting systems in operation in 2002 in Japan
Source: Matsuto, T.
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Fischer-Tropsch (FT) Process
Proven technology, originally invented in Germany in 1920s
Catalyzed chemical reaction where hydrogen and carbon monoxide are converted to liquid hydrocarbons
Typical catalysts based on Fe and Co
Main objective is to produce a synthetic substitute to petroleum
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Plasma
It is an ionized gas
Considered by some as the “fourth state of matter”
For example – water molecules:below 0°C ---------------------- Solid (i.e., ice)above 0°C ---------------------- Liquid (water)above 100°C -------------------- Gas (steam)above 5,000 to 10,000°C ----- Plasma (ionized
gas)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
PlasmaEnergy that is added causes neutral atoms of gas to split
As atoms split a plasma of positively and negatively charged atoms and electrons is formed
Need high voltage to generate electric arc, two electrodes (cathode and anode) and gas (helium, air)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Plasma – Commercial ApplicationsWelding and cutting
Steel melting furnaces
Some hazardous and radioactive wastes treated
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Plasma – Application to SWSmall unit operating in a cruise ship for about 3 years
Some propose to “gasify” the waste and use gas to generate electricity
Several “start-up” companies during the last few years, most operate pilot plants
Concerns about gas cleaning and solid residue produced
Unproven on commercial scale in United States
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Biogasification – System Schematic
Bioreactor(high/low moisture)
Organic Feed
Organic Residue
Biogas(medium- to high-Btu)
Heat
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Process Rate Limiting FactorsTwo-stage, biological process
The final stage (methane formation) is the slowest, and thus the rate-limiting one
Successful acceleration of processing rate will decrease cost
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Organic Waste Management in Europe
Potential organic waste in EU15:15 million tons/year
Treatment (2004):11 million tons biowaste and 7 million tons of greenwaste
3.5 million tons A/D
All plants process:about 42% (+2% to 2002)
8.5 million tons of compost
Source: European Composting Network (ECN)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Status of Anaerobic Digestion of Organics in Europe (2005)
About 87 industrial plants with a capacity of about 3.0 million tons/year:
• smaller space requirements compared to windrow composting• easier emission/odor management• about 46% are dry, 54% are wet digestion systems• better removal of impurities (plastics, metals)• recovery of energy (subsidies 0.1 €/KWh) and fuel-> 5000 on-farm co-digestion plants (Germany, Austria)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Mechanical-Biological Treatment MBT (2005)
=> Pre-treatment of rest waste after separate collection (or of mixed MSW) by mechanical processes followed by composting or digestion to stabilize the material before landfilling
Italy 94 plants - 7.5 million tons/yearGermany 60 plants - 5.0 million tons/yearAustria 15 plants - around 0.5 million tons/yearSpain 15 plants - 1.1 million tons/yearFrance 77 old MSW plants – 1.9 million tons/year
First plants in the Netherlands, UK, and Belgium
Goal: production of residue with very low organic matter content that is suitable for landfilling
Source: European Composting Network (ECN)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
A/D Plants in Europe as of 2004
2,910,20087Totals
943,50029Others
786,70011VALORGA
517,00012LINDE/BRV
234,50010OWS/DRANCO
215,50016KOGAS
213,0009MAT/BAT
Capacity (Mg/a)No. of PlantsSystem
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Pilot Food Waste Digester in Richmond, California (1984)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
New Tunnel Anaerobic Digester Digester (Dry Fermentation)
Bunkers for Feedstock Digesters in Enclosure (insulation being installed)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Discontinuous Dry Fermentation with Percolation
substrate
fermenter
garage door
wheel loader
waste gas
biogas
perkolation tank
Source: Weiland, P. FAL, Germany
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Continuous Dry Fermentation withPlug-Flow Feeding
biogas
digestate
substrate fermenter
mixer
solidsseparation
solids
processwater
M
M
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Biogas Plants for Co-Digestion of Cattle Manure and Other Biomass (UTS)
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Growth of Biogas Plants in Germany
Source: Weiland, P. FAL, Germany
Number of plants has increased substantially:100 in 1990
1050 in 2000
2800 in 2005
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Relevant Financial IncentivesAward “Green Certificates” (GC):
European Directive 2001/77/CE
promotes production of energy from renewable sources
provides financial incentive to producer (time period and amount vary from country to country)
one GC = 50 MWh of energy
in Italy, financial incentive is 0.115 €/kWhe per year (~.138 US$/kWhe year)
in Italy, incentive is valid for 8 years from startup of plant – can be extended 4 more years (financial incentive reduced to 60%)
in Germany, incentives last over 20 years
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Renewable Sources of Energy Act(2006) -- Germany
Technology bonus: € 0.02/kWhe (e.g. dry fermentation)
KW-Bonus: € 0.02/kWhe for external heat utilization
4,08,64501 - 5.000
6,09,60151 - 500
6,011,16150
Energy crops bonus
[€ 0.01/kWhe]
Compensation
[€ 0.01/kWhe]
Electricalcapacity
[kW]
Source: Weiland, P. FAL, Germany
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
HydrogenHydrogen is considered a clean energy source
Hydrogen has a high energy yield (122 kJ/g) --about 2.75 higher than fossil fuels
Current methods for the production of hydrogen mainly use fossil fuels as energy source, are energy-intensive and not always environment friendly
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Hydrogen in NatureAll processes that produce hydrogen biologically depend upon the presence of a hydrogen-producing enzyme
Hydrogen-producing enzymes catalyze the “simple”chemical reaction
2 H+ + 2 e- H2
Currently three enzymes are known: Nitrogenase
Fe-Hydrogenase
NiFe-Hydrogenase
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Biological Hydrogen ProductionBiological hydrogen production processes can be classified as follows:
biophotolysis of water using algae and cyanobacteria
photodecomposition of organic compounds by photosynthetic bacteria
fermentative hydrogen production from organic compounds (“dark” fermentation)
hybrid systems using photosynthetic and fermentative bacteria
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Enzymatic HydrolysisMicrobial conversion of cellulose into glucose
Most common microorganisms are Trichodermaviridae
Demonstrated at pilot scale
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Enzymatic Hydrolysis (cont.)Processing involves several steps:
feed preparation (addition of nutrients and sterilization to microorganisms)
treatment of organic residues (cellulose)
hydrolysis of cellulose
glucose separation
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
General -- Operations and Maintenance
O&M associated with commercial-scale processing of waste mixtures is oftentimes substantially underestimated
Lack of independent, reliable estimates of O&M costs for commercial-scale processing alternatives
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
General -- Unscheduled O&M Problems
Valve clogged with contamination; even
very low concentrations of
undesirable materials can bring a system to a halt
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
General -- Operations and Maintenance (cont.)
Reliability, availability, and maintainability of equipment can result in very low overall system processing efficiency:
pre-processing/feedstock preparation
conversion subsystem
residue handling subsystem
pollution control subsystem
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Conclusions Inefficiency of collection and transportation of organic wastes is a serious impediment to these wastes, contributing substantially to energy generationR&D needed to improve efficiency of waste-to-energy conversion processes, thereby reducing cost of energy generation
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Conclusions (cont.)Legislative mandates and financial incentives are encouraging the growth of biotreatment in Europe
Many plants now operating in Europe of varying sizes; most are small, relative to needs of US
Financial incentives promoting A/D mostly as an investment
Return on investment may be 5 years or less
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
Conclusions (cont.)Limited or conflicting information to make sound management decisions
Need reliable, scientifically based information
Optimization of bioreactor designs and quick removal and purification of gases offer good possibilities for bio-hydrogen systems
Biological hydrogen production processes are mostly operated at ambient temperatures and pressure; thus, less energy-intensive than the current production processes
CalRecoveryCalRecoveryCalRecovery
20th Anniversary of Sardinia SymposiumTo be held at the Forte Village Complex at S. Margheritadi Pula (Cagliari, Sardinia), Italy – October 1-5, 2007One of the most important conferences in the world, dealing with many issues in waste managementTopics include:
policy and educationrecycling, minimizationtreatment of different fractionslifecycle assessment
Additional information at www.sardiniasymposium.it