Upload
roderick-lamb
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Overview
of the KSTAR commissioning
M. Kwon
3 June, 2008
1. To test the components and systems after system integration.
2. To demonstrate that systems are in accordance with the design values and the performance criteria.
3. To identify any defect preventing the device operation and plasma experiments.
Commissioning Objective
1. Vacuum quality in every environment, before & after cool-down.
2. Controlled cryogenic cool-down of all superconducting magnet
system.
3. Status of the SC magnet assembly without individual cool-down
test.
4. Performance of the Nb3Sn magnet system during the 1st plasma
discharge.
Checkpoints during the Commissioning
Commissioning Milestones
1st PlasmaJune 30
Cooled-down
May 02
• Vacuum pumping system operation• VV baking operation• Discharge cleaning• Gas fuelling system operation
• Base pressure of VV
• Target : 5 x 10-7 mbar, achieved < 3 x 10-8 mbar
• Base pressure of cryostat at room temperature
• Target : 1 x 10-4 mbar, achieved < 1 x 10-5 mbar
• VV baking : 100 0C
• DC glow discharge cleaning(H2, He)
• Fueling system operation & testing
Major Operation
Operation Results
Vacuum commissioning
• Gas : He• No. of Electrodes : 1• RF Power : 200 W• DC Bias Voltage : 400 V• DC Current : 4 A• Operation Pressure : 6.0 10-3 mbar
Vacuum vessel pressure (Mar. 08)
Cryostat pressure (Mar. 08)
• Operation & control of the helium refrigeration system & helium distribution system (9 kW @ 4.5 K).
• Controlled cool-down of cold systems: SC magnet, structures, busline, thermal shields, current leads.
• Superconducting phase transition
Major Operation
Control & Monitoring
• Hydraulic parameters • Temperature, pressure & flow distribution
• Mechanical monitoring• Stress & displacement
• Superconductor monitoring• Coil resistance & SC phase transition
• Safety• Vacuum & helium pressure monitoring
Cool-down commissioning
TF coil CS coil PF Coil
conductor Nb3Sn & Incoloy 908 Nb3Sn & Incoloy 908Nb3Sn & Incoloy 908 (PF5)
NbTi & 316 LN (PF6,7)
No. of coil 16 4 pair 3 pair
Total length 10.2 km 3.8 km 11.2 km
Cooling channel of each coil 4 CS1 : 10, CS2 : 8CS3 : 4, CS4 : 6
PF5 : 8 PF6 : 8, PF7 : 6
Length of each channel 160 m 67 mPF5 : 176 m
PF6 : 315 m, PF7 : 285 m
Cold mass 170 ton 60 ton 70 ton
Operating temperature 5 K 5 K 5 K
Coolant4.5 K SHe
P > 5.5 bar Mass flow rate > 300 g/s
4.5 K SHe P > 5.5 bar
Mass flow rate ~150 g/s
4.5 K SHeP > 5.5 bar
Mass flow rate ~ 150 g/s
CS1U
CS2U
CS3UCS4U
CS1L
CS2LCS3LCS4L
KSTAR SC coils
Cool-down of KSTAR
In April 26, KSTAR superconducting coils were successfully cooled-down.
Controlled cool-down (∆T < 50 K)
The maximum temperature difference in the magnet structures was carefully controlled within 50 K during the cool-down.
Mass flow rate• The gaseous helium of maximum 200 g/s was supplied by the clod box.• After cool-down, the SC coils were cooled by the 600 g/s supercritical helium of
cryogenic circulator to its operating temperature.
Temperature distribution in the thermal shields
• The cryostat thermal shields were well cooled below 70 K. • The maximum temperature of the CRTS measured in 180 K on the blank cover plate without
cooling lines. • The temperature of the vacuum vessel shield was distributed in 90 K ~ 120 K
Cryostat vacuum during cool-down• After cool-down, the vacuum pressure of the cryostat reached to 2.6E-8 mbar. • The partial pressure of each gas greatly decreased as coil cooling and the
residual helium gas was kept almost constant pressure level.
SC transition measurement
• The superconducting phase transition of the SC coils was clearly observed during the 1st cool-down.
• The SC transition of Nb3Sn and NbTi coils appeared at 18K and 9K, respectively.
KSTAR Coils
SCstrand
Tc [K]Expected Measured
[K] [K}
TF Nb3Sn 18.3 17.9
PF1PF1U Nb3Sn
18.3 18.2PF1L Nb3Sn
PF2PF2U Nb3Sn
18.3 18PF2L Nb3Sn
PF3PF3U Nb3Sn 18.3 18
PF3L Nb3Sn 18.3 18
PF4PF4U Nb3Sn 18.3 17.9
PF4L Nb3Sn 18.3 18
PF5PF5U Nb3Sn 18.3 18
PF5L Nb3Sn 18.3 18
PF6PF6U NbTi 9.2 10
PF6L NbTi 9.2 9.8
PF7PF7U NbTi 9.2 10
PF7L NbTi 9.2 10
The measured Tc of the 16 TF coils
SC transition measurement
[The results of the measured Tc of SC coils]
Joint Resistance• The voltage drops were measured at each SC bus-line, which consists of several
numbers of electrical joints.• The joint resistances were estimated by linear fitting to the measured V-I curves.• All of the KSTAR lap joint resistances satisfied the design value of 5 nΩ.
CoilLap Joints
[EA]Total R
[nΩ]Average
[nΩ /joint]Design Value
TF 8 11.1 1.38
< 5 nΩ
PF1 7 15.6 2.23
PF2 7 11.1 1.59
PF3 12 20.3 1.69
PF4 12 17.4 1.45
PF5 12 25.2 2.1
PF6 12 11.2 0.93
PF7 8 4.11 0.51
[The KSTAR lap joint of the SC bus-line]
TR No.
Radial displacements (mm), @ 11K
Sensor indication(Reset at 311 K)
Contractionfrom 293 K
FEManalysis
Deviation
TR 01 -8.59 -7.93 -8.2 -0.27
TR 02 -8.26 -7.67 -8.2 -0.53
TR 03 -8.33 -7.66 -8.2 -0.54
TR 04 -8.26 -7.71 -8.2 -0.49
Radial displacements of the toroidal ring
Reference ; “KSTAR Magnet Structure Stress Analysis”, Efremove, July, 2003
• Radial displacements of the toroidal ring from 293 K to 11 K were measured in the range of 7.66 mm ~ 7.93 mm, which is comparable of the FEM analysis result.
• The maximum deviation of the segments is just 0.006 % as compared with the diameter of the ring, 5780 mm.
• Superconducting joint resistance measurement
• Insulation test at cryogenic temperature
• Magnet power supply control
• TF coil charge & discharge : up to 15 kA (B0 = 1.5 T, Bm = 3.1 T)
• PF coil charge & blip operation
Major Operation
Control & Monitoring
• Coil current & voltage• Field on SC magnet, in vacuum vessel• Coil performance under the dc & pulse field variation• Interlock & safe discharge (quench discharge)
SC Magnet Commissioning
TF magnet SD & FD test
SD & FD test at 5 kA
QD & MD adjust
TF coil charging test (15 kA, 8 hr)
PF Blip Operation
PF1 : 2.7 kA
PF2 : 2.1 kA
PF3 : 2.8 kA
PF5 : 2.1 kA
PF6 : 2.3 kA
PF4 : 2.6 kA
PF7 : -2.3 kA
PF1 coil blip test
TF & PF1 coil charging test
ICRF Discharge test
Cathode voltage (yellow)
Body voltage (green)
Beam current (pink)
Body current (blue)
RF power: ~ 400 kW, 100 ms pulse
Beam current
Forward RF signal
Backward RF signal
Forward RF signal(at the end of transmission line)
Gyrotron operation parameters (80 kV, 18 A, 100 ms)
84 GHz, 500kW CPI Gyrotron(2008. 4. 21)
Gyrotron installation: 2008. 4. 21 Gyrotron Aging: 2008. 4. 28 –
400 kW, 100 ms RF aging Transmission line is under aging
Status of KSTAR ECH commissioning
• Fueling & wall conditioning
• Heating system readiness test
• MPS and BRIS tuning
• ECH pre-ionization
• Plasma start-up and optimization
Major Test
Control & Monitoring
• Coil performance under the dc & pulse field variation• Measurement of plasma parameters (current, density, image, loop voltage, H-alpha etc.)• Change of ECH parameters• Plasma control and monitoring
Plasma Start-up Commissioning
KSTAR SHOT number 586(2008. 05. 30)
00.5
11.5
2
0500
100015002000
00.10.20.30.4
012345
01234
0200004000060000
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
ECH Power (A.U)
PF Current (A)
Line Density (1019 m-2)
H-α Intensity (A.U)
Loop Voltage (V)
Total Current (A)
Time (sec)
KSTAR will be one of the most effective devices for ITER relevant operation and physics for reliable fusion reactor.
Accumulation of the technical know-how for the superconducting tokamak operation
Leading the high performance steady-state plasma experiment
Goal
Phase
•First plasma•SC tokamak operation technology (Bt = 3.5 T)
•D-shaped plasma (Ip >1 MA, D2)
•H -mode achievement
•Collaboration for operation
•Long pulse operation (tpulse> 100 s)
• AT operation Tech. (Pheat< 20 MW)
•ITER pilot device operation
•Collaboration for steady-state operation
•Long pulse operation (tpulse > 300 s)
•Stable AT operation (Pheat > 20 MW)
•ITER satellite operation
•Collaboration for advanced research
•High beta AT mode & long pulse
•Reactor material test (divertor, blanket)
SC Tokamak Operation
Technology
Steady-state Operation
High-beta, AT Operation
Steady-state AT
Activities
1st Plasma D-D Reaction 100 s1MA Ion Temp > 10 keV
Year
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4
08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2507
ITER Construction Start ITER 1st Plasma
Milestone
Long-term operation plan
- 29 -