Overview of CERN Activities in 2005 Strategy for CERN Future 12 January 2006 R. Aymar

Overview of CERN Activities Overview of CERN Activities in 2005in 2005

Strategy for CERN Future Strategy for CERN Future

12 January 200612 January 2006

R. AymarR. Aymar

Firstly…

• At the beginning of the New Year, I would like

• to convey my best wishes to all of you, members of CERN and your families for the full satisfaction of your dreams!

• to formulate for CERN and for you all specific wishes and ambitions, led to success by your hard work and commitments

33

Overview of CERN Activities in 2005Overview of CERN Activities in 2005Strategy for CERN futureStrategy for CERN future

ContentsContents 1.1. BRAVO and THANKSBRAVO and THANKS

to each member of CERN staffto each member of CERN staff , , collaborative institutions and industrial firms collaborative institutions and industrial firms• you can be proud of the progress achieved during 2005you can be proud of the progress achieved during 2005• ResultsResults are visible and help to (re) build are visible and help to (re) build confidence for the futureconfidence for the future• StatementsStatements about progress in LHC construction about progress in LHC construction

2.2. Follow up of strategyFollow up of strategy proposed in 2005: proposed in 2005: possible scientific plans possible scientific plans• CERN Council Strategy Group for European Particle PhysicsCERN Council Strategy Group for European Particle Physics

3.3. LHC construction overviewLHC construction overview

4.4. Linear Colliders ILC/CLICLinear Colliders ILC/CLIC

5.5. Human ResourcesHuman Resources• 5 Yearly Review of CERN employment conditions5 Yearly Review of CERN employment conditions• Human Resources policy (plan prepared for MTP 2006)Human Resources policy (plan prepared for MTP 2006)• Pension Fund - Strategy of Management – GovernancePension Fund - Strategy of Management – Governance

6.6. CERN missions besides Research / discoveriesCERN missions besides Research / discoveries• Education / training Education / training • Technology transferTechnology transfer• WSIS (World summit of information society)WSIS (World summit of information society)• Open AccessOpen Access

7.7. ConclusionConclusion


2. Why a new structure ? 2. Why a new structure ?

This loss of confidence in CERN management This loss of confidence in CERN management at at all levelsall levels pushed the MS towards pushed the MS towards micromanagement micromanagement but it never drove them away but it never drove them away from the proper appreciation offrom the proper appreciation of the competence the competence and motivation of the individuals in CERN.and motivation of the individuals in CERN.

We should recover the full confidence of the We should recover the full confidence of the Member States.Member States.

The future of CERN depends on this recovery.The future of CERN depends on this recovery.


3. How should this structure work? 3. How should this structure work?

Our cooperation with European Particle Physics Our cooperation with European Particle Physics Laboratories should be strengthened and Laboratories should be strengthened and deepeneddeepened– more collaboration towards common goals (accelerator more collaboration towards common goals (accelerator

Departments should follow examples of Physics Departments should follow examples of Physics Department)Department)

– more active participation of CERN in ECFAmore active participation of CERN in ECFA

At the Council level a new (old) objective has At the Council level a new (old) objective has been agreed: to steer the European PP activities been agreed: to steer the European PP activities (in addition to supervise the CERN Lab(in addition to supervise the CERN Lab))


4. For which scientific objectives? (1)4. For which scientific objectives? (1)

The following strategic orientations are proposed The following strategic orientations are proposed for CERN activities in 2004-2010:for CERN activities in 2004-2010:– 1. 1. to keep the utmost priority for the completion to keep the utmost priority for the completion

of the LHC project, and strive for a start of of the LHC project, and strive for a start of operations in the summer of 2007operations in the summer of 2007 = machine / = machine / detectors / LCGdetectors / LCG

– 2. to fulfil commitments previously made by CERN: 2. to fulfil commitments previously made by CERN: CNGS, EGEECNGS, EGEE

– 3. after an in-depth risk analysis review, 3. after an in-depth risk analysis review, to mitigate to mitigate the consequences of failure of old equipment that the consequences of failure of old equipment that is necessary for reliable LHC operationis necessary for reliable LHC operation..


5. Conclusions5. Conclusions

– With improvement in the collective interaction throughout the With improvement in the collective interaction throughout the organization, (not only by new tools, but through voluntary human organization, (not only by new tools, but through voluntary human relationship)relationship)

– By strengthening individual leadership and the full exercise of By strengthening individual leadership and the full exercise of individual responsibility to favour the cost-schedule-performance individual responsibility to favour the cost-schedule-performance awareness,awareness,

– With an increase in the voluntary collaboration of CERN with other With an increase in the voluntary collaboration of CERN with other European PP Laboratories.European PP Laboratories.

I am convinced that the challenges ahead of us will be I am convinced that the challenges ahead of us will be overcome:overcome:

– the LHC can be ready in time (within cost) and will be another the LHC can be ready in time (within cost) and will be another success in the large series of CERN prestigious achievements: success in the large series of CERN prestigious achievements: scientific discoveries will not be far ahead,scientific discoveries will not be far ahead,

– the Members States’ confidence in CERN can be fully restored, the Members States’ confidence in CERN can be fully restored, around an agreed European scientific strategy, supported by around an agreed European scientific strategy, supported by appropriate resources, thus providing CERN with a sure future. appropriate resources, thus providing CERN with a sure future. Two milestones: end 2006 and 2009-2010.Two milestones: end 2006 and 2009-2010.


Global views and strategy (2) Global views and strategy (2)

2005 is going to be a year without beams (except the 2005 is going to be a year without beams (except the Booster and Isolde) but not a "dull year".Booster and Isolde) but not a "dull year".2005 (and 2006) are absolutely crucial years2005 (and 2006) are absolutely crucial years to plan, to plan, carry out, and improve everything needed to:carry out, and improve everything needed to:– Ensure that our priority challenge will be achieved successfully, Ensure that our priority challenge will be achieved successfully,

i.e. i.e. first LHC collisions in the summer of 2007 and a rapid first LHC collisions in the summer of 2007 and a rapid and safe start of operations with useful luminosity and and safe start of operations with useful luminosity and associated resultsassociated results..

– Prepare opportunities and essentials for the future research Prepare opportunities and essentials for the future research programme in HEPprogramme in HEP in coordinated collaboration with the in coordinated collaboration with the European Laboratories, and clarify the future role of CERN European Laboratories, and clarify the future role of CERN (CERN Council’s responsibility, EU 7th Framework Programme)(CERN Council’s responsibility, EU 7th Framework Programme)

– Promote the recognition of CERN’s other missionsPromote the recognition of CERN’s other missions:: technology transfer, education and training (including fellows)technology transfer, education and training (including fellows)


Global views and strategy (3) Global views and strategy (3)

CERN’s resources, human and financial, are scarce to face CERN’s resources, human and financial, are scarce to face all these challenges, nevertheless all these challenges, nevertheless we should pursue a we should pursue a fundamental goalfundamental goal to recover the full confidence of to recover the full confidence of Member States in CERN’s capacitiesMember States in CERN’s capacities (not competences) (not competences) as a whole, by completing the LHC in time and, as a whole, by completing the LHC in time and,

therefore benefiting from this success to obtain appropriate therefore benefiting from this success to obtain appropriate resources to support future scientific objectives,resources to support future scientific objectives,

2005 will also be a crucial year2005 will also be a crucial year for the 5-Yearly Review of for the 5-Yearly Review of employment conditionsemployment conditions.. This is neither the time nor the This is neither the time nor the place to enter into possible details, but in my mind, place to enter into possible details, but in my mind, the the results of the 5-Yearly Review should provide the best results of the 5-Yearly Review should provide the best support to achieving the previous goalssupport to achieving the previous goals.. This will enable This will enable the recruitment of the best staff, to maintain high motivation the recruitment of the best staff, to maintain high motivation and efficiency, and in return, an appropriate recognition of and efficiency, and in return, an appropriate recognition of their contributions, merits and individual responsibilities.their contributions, merits and individual responsibilities.


International Cost and Schedule Review CommitteeInternational Cost and Schedule Review CommitteeReport of December 2005Report of December 2005

When the Committee met one year ago the LHC Project Leader was not When the Committee met one year ago the LHC Project Leader was not able to present the Committee with a revised installation plan that met the able to present the Committee with a revised installation plan that met the February 2007 installation completion date due to:February 2007 installation completion date due to:– the underground construction problems at the CMS cavern at point 5the underground construction problems at the CMS cavern at point 5– the installation of the QRL suspendedthe installation of the QRL suspended– the design of the Distribution Feedboxes (DFBs) significantly behind schedulethe design of the Distribution Feedboxes (DFBs) significantly behind schedule

Today:Today:– magnet installation is underway in sectors 7-8, 8-1, and 4-5magnet installation is underway in sectors 7-8, 8-1, and 4-5

We, the Committee, are impressed with the degree of recovery from the We, the Committee, are impressed with the degree of recovery from the nearly three year delay in the installation.nearly three year delay in the installation.We applaud the Director General and the Project Leader for their complete We applaud the Director General and the Project Leader for their complete commitment to meet the Feb 2007 Milestone and the start of beam commitment to meet the Feb 2007 Milestone and the start of beam commissioning in July 2007, we support the plan.commissioning in July 2007, we support the plan.

Afterwards the Council made the following statement:Afterwards the Council made the following statement:The Council took note of the status report by the Director-General and congratulated the CERN The Council took note of the status report by the Director-General and congratulated the CERN Staff and Management, together with the staff of partner institutions and industrial firms for their Staff and Management, together with the staff of partner institutions and industrial firms for their achievements in 2005. The Council also expresses appreciation to the Director-General for his achievements in 2005. The Council also expresses appreciation to the Director-General for his vision and leadership.vision and leadership.

Bravo and heartfelt thanks to all for your actions and your dedicationBravo and heartfelt thanks to all for your actions and your dedication ..


Strategic plans for the future Strategic plans for the future

After recognized evidence of the Laboratory’s successful After recognized evidence of the Laboratory’s successful achievements (in 2007), we should be entitled to come back to the achievements (in 2007), we should be entitled to come back to the MS and request approval of new scientific objectives and to provide MS and request approval of new scientific objectives and to provide coherent resources;coherent resources;

Therefore, we have to Therefore, we have to prepare the future scientific programmeprepare the future scientific programme,, and to show the motivations of the Laboratory and its individuals;and to show the motivations of the Laboratory and its individuals;

Even if we are heavily concentrated on the LHC, Even if we are heavily concentrated on the LHC, we should be we should be engaged in a minimal programme of R&D and design,engaged in a minimal programme of R&D and design, to reap to reap the benefit of an increased cooperation with European Laboratories the benefit of an increased cooperation with European Laboratories (new programmes have been launched independently of CERN);(new programmes have been launched independently of CERN);

Staff members involved in this R&D programme should feel obliged Staff members involved in this R&D programme should feel obliged to deliver more, being privileged and suffering less pressure for to deliver more, being privileged and suffering less pressure for procurement and installation of LHC components;procurement and installation of LHC components;

LHC completion is an indisputable priority.LHC completion is an indisputable priority.


For which scientific objectives? (6)For which scientific objectives? (6)

7.7. in 2006-2007, to decide on the implementation of in 2006-2007, to decide on the implementation of the Linac 4 and any increased R&D programme, the Linac 4 and any increased R&D programme, depending on new funds made available and on a depending on new funds made available and on a new HR policynew HR policy

8.8. in 2009-2010, to review and redefine the strategy in 2009-2010, to review and redefine the strategy for CERN activities in the next decade 2011-2020 in for CERN activities in the next decade 2011-2020 in the light of the first results from LHC and of the light of the first results from LHC and of progress and results from the previous actions. The progress and results from the previous actions. The possible choices are at present quite open. The possible choices are at present quite open. The future role of CERN will depend on these choices future role of CERN will depend on these choices and their effective funding.and their effective funding.


Possible Scientific Plan Possible Scientific Plan

R&D pursuedR&D pursued– CARE Joint Research Activities (PHIN, HIPPI, NED)CARE Joint Research Activities (PHIN, HIPPI, NED)– CLIC/CTF3 CLIC/CTF3 – IPHI / test for LINAC 4 to be prepared for 2006IPHI / test for LINAC 4 to be prepared for 2006

collaboration with CEA-Saclay (0-3 MeV)collaboration with CEA-Saclay (0-3 MeV)collaboration with ITEP and BINP and previous military Russian Labs through INTC (for 3-collaboration with ITEP and BINP and previous military Russian Labs through INTC (for 3-10 and 10-40 MeV)10 and 10-40 MeV)

Studies launched or confirmedStudies launched or confirmed– Design StudiesDesign Studies

CARE Network (BENE, ELAN, HHH)CARE Network (BENE, ELAN, HHH)EUROTEV - EURISOL - EUDETEUROTEV - EURISOL - EUDETNeutrinos Physics (scoping study)Neutrinos Physics (scoping study)

– CERN Working GroupsCERN Working GroupsPAFPAF (Proton Accelerators for the Future) (Proton Accelerators for the Future) to define a preferred scenario for up-grading the CERN accelerator complex (staging, to define a preferred scenario for up-grading the CERN accelerator complex (staging, schedule, resources needed for R&D and design, estimated cost) to best fit the needs of schedule, resources needed for R&D and design, estimated cost) to best fit the needs of LHC up-grades, fixed target proposals (SPSC and INTC), and neutrino physicsLHC up-grades, fixed target proposals (SPSC and INTC), and neutrino physicsPOFPAPOFPA (Physics opportunities with Future Proton Accelerators) (Physics opportunities with Future Proton Accelerators)to assess likely physics objectives of LHC up grades and non collider experiments, to assess likely physics objectives of LHC up grades and non collider experiments, neutrino physics, heavy-ion physics in close liaison with PAF.neutrino physics, heavy-ion physics in close liaison with PAF.Joint Study GroupJoint Study Group

– LHC-HERALHC-HERA– LHC-ILCLHC-ILC– CLIC PhysicsCLIC Physics


CERN CouncilCERN CouncilEuropean Strategy Group for Particle PhysicsEuropean Strategy Group for Particle Physics

1 b) New plans for the future scientific programme1 b) New plans for the future scientific programme

In June 2005, the CERN Council In June 2005, the CERN Council unanimously decidedunanimously decided to take up the task of defining the strategy for European to take up the task of defining the strategy for European particle physics. In order to achieve that goal, the Council particle physics. In order to achieve that goal, the Council further unanimously decidedfurther unanimously decided to set up an to set up an ad ad hochoc scientific advisory group with the remit of making a scientific advisory group with the remit of making a proposal that will enable the Council to produce a strategy proposal that will enable the Council to produce a strategy document, approved by all Member States.document, approved by all Member States.

The Group will hold a workshop for one week in Berlin to The Group will hold a workshop for one week in Berlin to finalise the strategy document; preparatory work will be led finalise the strategy document; preparatory work will be led by SPC/ECFA members.by SPC/ECFA members.


CERN CouncilCERN CouncilEuropean Strategy Group for Particle PhysicsEuropean Strategy Group for Particle Physics

To that end, To that end, it was agreedit was agreed that the Strategy Group should that the Strategy Group should comprise:comprise:

– one scientist proposed by each Delegation;one scientist proposed by each Delegation;

– the Chairman of the SPC and the Chairman ECFA, to act as co-the Chairman of the SPC and the Chairman ECFA, to act as co-chairs of the Strategy Group;chairs of the Strategy Group;

– some SPC and ECFA members, who would also act as the some SPC and ECFA members, who would also act as the steering group;steering group;

– the CERN Director-General and Chief Scientific Officer, and the the CERN Director-General and Chief Scientific Officer, and the Directors of Europe's other main particle physics laboratories, Directors of Europe's other main particle physics laboratories, namely DESY, RAL, Orsay, DAPNIA, PSI, Frascati and Gran namely DESY, RAL, Orsay, DAPNIA, PSI, Frascati and Gran Sasso.Sasso.

Special meeting of the Council in Lisbon 14 July 2006 Special meeting of the Council in Lisbon 14 July 2006 to draw conclusions on the European strategy.to draw conclusions on the European strategy.

1616










1717

SafetySafety Safety is an indispensable frame for working conditions, without Safety is an indispensable frame for working conditions, without compromisecompromise Two serious accidents happened last year (25/10 and 16/11 2005), one Two serious accidents happened last year (25/10 and 16/11 2005), one with fatal consequencewith fatal consequenceOur thoughts are with the victim's familyOur thoughts are with the victim's family Internal procedures to investigate the cases did not show any failure to Internal procedures to investigate the cases did not show any failure to observe safety rules and proceduresobserve safety rules and proceduresNevertheless, these events have raised the awareness of risks and the Nevertheless, these events have raised the awareness of risks and the necessity of safety rules, safety training, safety organisation to be a necessity of safety rules, safety training, safety organisation to be a permanent concern. permanent concern.

An effort has started to review our overall safety rules to see if we can An effort has started to review our overall safety rules to see if we can make them shorter and clearermake them shorter and clearer

Another large effort, as a crash programmeAnother large effort, as a crash programme,, concerns the concerns the preparation of the preparation of the ""Dossier de Sûreté" for the INBDossier de Sûreté" for the INB (LHC/SPS/CNGS) (LHC/SPS/CNGS) to be available in Feb 2006 for a review by the Safety Authorities and to to be available in Feb 2006 for a review by the Safety Authorities and to get their approval for the start of LHC operation. get their approval for the start of LHC operation.

Safety is the duty of everybody

L.R. Evans – EDMS Document No. 689326

SPC

1812 January 2006

Superconducting cable 1 (dipole inner layer)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

01-Jan-01 01-Jan-02 01-Jan-03 01-Jan-04 01-Jan-05 01-Jan-06 01-Jan-07

Equ

ival

ent

dipo

les

Contractual Accepted strands Delivered Just in time


SPC

1912 January 2006

Cryodipole overview

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000


Equ

ival

ent

dipo

les

Cold masses delivered Cryodipoles assembled

Cryodipoles cold tests passed Cryodipoles assigned to position in ring

Cryodipoles prepared for installation Cryodipoles installed


SPC

2012 January 2006

Preparation for installation in SMI2

Hall SMI2


SPC

2112 January 2006

Transport in the tunnel is very tight!


SPC

2212 January 2006

Transfer on jacks


SPC

2312 January 2006

Cryomagnets interconnect in the tunnel


SPC

2412 January 2006

Cryogenic distribution line

One sector

Two sectors

Three sectors

Four sectors

Five sectors

Six sectors

Seven sectors

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280


Equ

ival

ent

cells

Pipe elements delivered Service modules delivered Installed Interconnected

12 January 2006 25

QRL installation status


SPC

2612 January 2006

Cryogenics overview


SPC

2712 January 2006

24h endurance test of all power converters in 8-left (13-14 October 2005)

81 power converters in UA83

3 x 13 kA power converters

18 x 4 to 7 kA power converters

31 x 600 A power converters

29 x 120 A power converters

156 kA and 1.2 MW dissipated: PCs and Cables (estimation)


SPC

2812 January 2006

THANKS for help provided by MS and non-MS for LHC commissioning (~90 Project Associates during 18 months)

New Control Room in Prévessin (to be inaugurated in March 2006) unique for all needs of CERN

Appointment of M. FERRO-LUZZI as LHC Programme Coordinator


SPC

2912 January 2006

Conclusions

• All key objectives have been reached for the end of 2005.

• End of repair of QRL, reinstallation of sector 7-8 and cold test of

sub-sectors A and B.

• Cool-down of full sector 8-1.

• Pressure test of sector 4-5.

• Endurance test of full octant of power converters.

• Magnet installation rate is now close to 20/week, with more than

200 installed. This, together with interconnect work, will remain the

main bottleneck until the end of installation.


ATLAS Barrel Toroid installation statusThe mechanical installation is complete, electrical and cryogenic connections are being made now, for a first in-situ cool-down and excitation test in spring 2006


End-Cap Toroids

The picture shows a successfultrial assembly of the full coldmass in front of the vacuumvessel for the first ECT (side A)

The final assembly is planned tobe completed in the coming weeks

ATLASATLAS


ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT)

All four barrel cylinders are complete and at CERN

Assembly of the four barrel cylinders is complete (left),and the SCT barrel is now being prepared for insertion into the TRT barrel


ATLAS Barrel Muon MDTs

Installation of barrel muon station

A major effort is spent in the preparation andtesting of the barrel muon stations (MDTs andRPCs for the middle and outer stations) beforetheir installation in-situ

The electronics and alignment system fabrications for all MDTs are on schedule

MDT Chamber Production (w/o EE)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07Time

No

. Ch

amb

ers

Bare MDT

Plan Bare MDT

Integrated MDT

Tested MDT

Installed MDT

Plan Installation

12 January 200612 January 2006 3434

The CMS DetectorThe CMS Detector

MUON BARREL

Silicon MicrostripsPixels

ECAL Scintillating PbWO4 crystals

Drift Tube Chambers

Resistive Plate Chambers

SUPERCONDUCTINGCOIL

IRON YOKE

TRACKER

MUONENDCAPS

Total weight : 12,500 tOverall diameter : 15 mOverall length : 21.6 mMagnetic field : 4 Tesla

HCAL Plastic scintillator/brasssandwich

CALORIMETERSSpokesperson: M. Della Negra


CMS Solenoid ‘Construction’CMS Solenoid ‘Construction’

Coil in between the inner and outer vac-tank cylinders

Preliminary end-weld of tank followed by vac-test.

Final tank closure (deep penetration weld) by 20-Jan 06

Cool-down can then start.


DT/RPC Installation and Commissioning DT/RPC Installation and Commissioning

Barrel Yoke wheels YB+2 and YB+1: 80 (out of 210) DT/RPC Ch. Installed; 40 Ch. commissioned

37

ALICE ALICE DetectorDetector

TPCTPC

PHOSPHOS

Muon armMuon arm

TOFTOF

TRDTRDHMPIDHMPID

PMDPMD

ITSITS

ACCORDEACCORDE

Spokesperson J. Schukraft


ALICE Magnet field mappingALICE Magnet field mapping


ALICE TPC ROC InstallationALICE TPC ROC Installation


LHCb Spectrometer

VELO

RICH1

TT

Magnet

OTand IT

RICH2 Calo. System

Muon System

Spokesperson: T. Nakada

12 January 2006 41

LHCb RICH-2 transport to IP8


43

LCG

Full physicsrun

First physics

First beams

cosmics

2007

2005

2008

2006

Building the ServiceSC1 - Nov04-Jan05 - data transfer between CERN and three Tier-1s (FNAL, NIKHEF, FZK)

SC2 – Apr05 - data distribution from CERN to 7 Tier-1s – 600 MB/sec sustained for 10 days (one third of final nominal rate)

SC3 – Sep-Dec05 - demonstrate reliable basic service – most Tier-1s, some Tier-2s; push up Tier-1 data rates to 150 MB/sec (60 MB/sec to tape)

SC4 – May-Aug06 - demonstrate full service – all Tier-1s, major Tier-2s; full set of baseline services; data distribution and recording at nominal LHC rate (1.6 GB/sec)

LHC Service in operation – Sep06 – over following six months ramp up to full operational capacity & performance

LHC service commissioned – Apr07

today

LCG


EGEE EGEE

After EU DATA Grid, the EU Commission has recognised the After EU DATA Grid, the EU Commission has recognised the interest of grids for many sciences (later industries) and the interest of grids for many sciences (later industries) and the leadership of CERN facing the needs of LHC data storage and leadership of CERN facing the needs of LHC data storage and analysis computing → large EU support to CERN for the Grid analysis computing → large EU support to CERN for the Grid development.development.

Support to LCG from EGEE is important, conversely EGEE Support to LCG from EGEE is important, conversely EGEE developed software should be used by LCG to insure prolonged developed software should be used by LCG to insure prolonged supportsupport

lst phase of EGEE (April 2004-2006) is considered a large successlst phase of EGEE (April 2004-2006) is considered a large success

2nd phase of 2006-2008 has been approved and more EU support 2nd phase of 2006-2008 has been approved and more EU support grantedgranted

Next Step will require an organisation, called "EGO", to insure a Next Step will require an organisation, called "EGO", to insure a permanent, qualified and secure infrastructure to be available to all permanent, qualified and secure infrastructure to be available to all sciences (services will be paid by users). sciences (services will be paid by users).











J.P.Delahaye 12 January 2006 46

Participants: 22Duration: January 2004 – December

2008Total expenditures: 35.14 MEurosTotal E.U. support: 15.20 MEuros

The main objective of the CARE project is to generate a structured and integrated European area in the field of accelerator research and related R&D. The program includes the most advanced scientific and technological developments relevant to accelerator research for Particle Physics. It is articulated around 3 Networking Activities and 4 Joint Research Activities:

- ELAN (Electron Linear Accelerator Network)

- BENE (Beam for European Neutrino Experiments)

- HHH (High intensity High brightness Hadron Beams)

- SRF (Superconducting RF)- PHIN (PHoto-INjector)- HIPPI (High Intensity Proton Pulsed

Injectors)- NED (Next European Dipole)

Initiated:- EUROTeV- Beta beam task in EURISOL- EUDET

Considered:- LHC luminosity upgrade- Neutrino factory- Light quark and Phi factory

Initiated:- None yet

Considered:- None yet

E.U

. p

rog

ram

mes

: [2

/12]


CERN council Restricted session (Rome July 04)

•Encourages efforts towards the design and development of a Linear Collider as a unique opportunity at the precision frontier complementary to LHC

•Confirms its endorsement of accelerated R&D activities for CLIC

•Recognises the overall value for the world Particle Physics community of a decision to construct a TeV Linear Collider (ILC) and encourages the efforts of the leading players in that direction

•Takes the view that, in the course of this process, it will be appropriate to take stock of the LHC and accelerator R&D results and produce a new assessment of the Physics and technology by 2010.

•Is in the opinion that, in the initial phase (2004-2007), the organisational structure of the global initiative, in particular the ILC Central Design Team, should be light


Strategy to address key issues

•Key issues common to all Linear Collider studies independently of the chosen technology in close collaboration with:

•International Linear Collider (ILC) study•The Accelerator Test Facility (ATF@KEK)•European Laboratories in the frame of the

Coordinated Accelerator Research in Europe (CARE) and of a “Design Study” (EUROTeV) funded by EU Framework Programme (FP6)

•Key issues specific to CLIC technology:•Focus of the CLIC study•All R1 (feasibility) and R2 (design finalisation) key

issues addressed in test facilities: CTF@CERN except the Multi-Beam Klystron (MBK) which does not

require R&D but development by industry (feasibility study already done)


CERN contribution to ILC(B.Foster @ 1rst ILC workshop/KEK)

•R&D on generic key issues independent of technology:•Participation in EUROTeV design study, CARE project and ELAN network

•R&D on Beam diagnostics, Beam Delivery System (BDS), Beam dynamics...

•Resources: 2.3 MEur. material, 25 staff-y, 20 fellows-y = 6.75 MEur. total

•Tests with beam in CTF3 Test facility:•Beam instrumentation and beam simulations benchmarking

•Beam combination for DR injection/extraction with RF transv. cavities

•Participation to R&D on Low Emittance generation @ ATF/KEK

•Available expertise on Super-Conducting technology;•Nb coated Copper SC cavities (LEP2 352 MHz and 1.5 GHz high gradient

R&D)

•Large scale cryogenics systems (8*18kW @ 4.5K and 8*2.4kW @ 1.8K in LHC) comparable to ILC


CERN additional participation to ILC

•CERN proposed as a possible European site for ILC

•Participation to the site specific cost of ILC•Civil engineer: J.L.Baldy/CERN•Strong collaboration with DESY (Costing engineer)

taking advantage of TESLA cost study and CERN specific technology experts (Cryogenics, civil engineering, infrastructure….)

•Task force ILC-CLIC cost study (identical methods, identify cost drivers and differences,….)

•Contribution to ILC workshops:•KEK: Nov 13-15, 2004•Snowmass: August 14-27, 2005

•ILC- MoU


•High acceleration gradient (150 MV/m)

•“Compact” collider-overall length33 km

•Normal conducting accelerating structures

•High acceleration frequency (30 GHz)

•Two-Beam Acceleration Scheme

•RF power generation at high frequency•Cost-effective & efficient (~ 10%

overall)•Simple tunnel, no active elements•“modular” design, can be built in

stages•Easily expendable in energy

Overall layout for a center of mass energy of 3 TeV/c

CLIC technology for Multi-TeV Linear Colliders

33.2 km

5.2 km


Work packages

Relevant linac

subunit

Two-beam test stand

Test Beam Line

WP 3CLEX Building

WP 5 WP 2.2WP 6

WP 2.130 GHz

High GradientTest Stand

Probe Beam

WP 4Combiner Ring and Transfer

Lines

WP 1

WP 7 WP 9

Structures 30 GHz power sourceCTF3 Operation

WP 8


MoU of CTF3 collaboration

•Institutes presently invited to sign the MoU

•Multi-lateral collaboration between institutions and funding agencies similar to collaboration on physics detectors

•Addendum for each institute describing its contribution including resources

•CTF3 project managed by CTF3 collaboration committee with one representative of each collaborating Institute and a vote weighted to its contribution

•Chairman of committee and Collaboration spokesperson elected by members of CTF3 collaboration committee

•CERN similar to other institutes except for duties as host laboratory


Conclusion

•CERN participating to both ILC and CLIC

•Strong collaboration with Linear Collider community

•Number of synergies and complementary of the two studies

•CTF3 project to demonstrate feasibility of CLIC technology before 2010 presently on schedule

•CTF3 multi-lateral collaboration building-up

•Expression of interest from a large number of Institutes

•Laboratories and institutes invited to sign the collaboration MoU and annex describing contribution

•Necessary resources being presently identified

•Program of work in 2005 and 2006 well covered


The GDE Plan and ScheduleThe GDE Plan and Schedule

2 December 2005 CNGS status report to J. Engelen 56Installation of horn in the CNGS target chamber (3 Nov. 2005)

2 December 2005 CNGS status report to J. Engelen 57CNGS Target magazine installation











12 January 2006 59

5-Y Review of CERN employment conditions

Aim : maintain competitiveness of CERN on the employment market

Provide better long-term career perspectives by increasing salary maxima in most career paths

Optimize possibilities of rewarding performance by increasing the amounts available for merit awards

Enhance family policy, in particular in order to be attractive to young recruits

12 January 2006 60

Analysis of Data (CERN/FC/4824) Background

“For the analysis and use of the remuneration data collected, the Management proposes to determine the Organization’s main staff recruitment pool and to focus on the conditions in the Member States offering the most competitive employment terms in that area.

Determination of that main source of recruitment will be on the basis of the report drawn up on staff recruitment and retention”.

12 January 2006 61

Salary Levels - Data Collected

Report on recruitment and retention shows that CERN’s main recruitment pool is private industry(2/3 of CERN staff recruited)

Member State offering most competitive conditions in industry for most benchmarks is Switzerland

=> Comparator retained is Swiss industry

12 January 2006 62

Career Evolution Data collected

Merit orientation and modulation firmly established in the private sector and progressively adopted in the public sector

Reflects the increase in expertise with experience and hence market value: faster progression at beginning of career, flattening out with time

12 January 2006 63

Given the diversity of the data collected, CERN will apply its own family policy

It is proposed to:

maintain lump-sum payment for all CP

increase the CERN family & child allowancesby 20%-30% respectively

ProposalFamily & Child Allowance Management proposal

12 January 2006 64

Summary Management proposal

Increase of salary maxima in most career paths

Periodicity of advancement maintained (up to CP F)

Elimination of “Orange Zone”

Increased possibility to reward merit annually

Introduction of International Allowance

Increase of family & child allowances

Creation of a Creche facility

Introduction of a new definition of family

Improvement of family leave

12 January 2006 65

PENSION FUND

Following the discussions at the Finance Committee, the Governing Board and TREF and within the on-going effort set out in 2004 to study and implement “a comprehensive package of measures…. relating to all parties to the Pension Fund, namely the active staff, the beneficiaries and the Organization, in order to improve the capacity of the Fund to meet its long-term liabilities,” the Council unanimously decided:

to approve Recommendations 1 to 4 and 6 to 11 by the Governing Board; to approve a limited increase in the contributions of the Organization and active

members to the Pension Fund, corresponding to a total of 0.63% of basic salary with effect from 1st January 2006;

to collect the following information: a comparison with other comparable European pension funds, which should be done in

2006; the triennial actuarial review, which must be scheduled for the end of 2006 to be

available in 2007; a comprehensive review of the current Rule and Regulations of the Pension Fund;

in order to examine the position of the Pension Fund in 2007 and take a decision on Recommendation 5 and on any other potential measures by the end of 2007.












Education/TrainingEducation/Training

CERN SchoolsCERN Schools (Physics/Accelerators/Computing) are highly regarded – large (Physics/Accelerators/Computing) are highly regarded – large competition to attend –competition to attend –New schools established : - physics in Latin America, (2New schools established : - physics in Latin America, (2ndnd in 2005/Argentina) in 2005/Argentina)

- physics in India- physics in India- LHC physics (CERN-FERMILAB)- LHC physics (CERN-FERMILAB)- Linear collider (joint EU-JA-USA)- Linear collider (joint EU-JA-USA)

Students programme at CERN highly competitiveStudents programme at CERN highly competitive- large number of Marie Curie European grants to CERN (less for fellows)- large number of Marie Curie European grants to CERN (less for fellows)HELENHELEN : EU programme to increase the relationship and exchange of scientists from : EU programme to increase the relationship and exchange of scientists from Latin America Universities with European labs in Particle-PhysicsLatin America Universities with European labs in Particle-PhysicsCERN will receive Fellows/Professors / 250 man-months / per year for 3 yearsCERN will receive Fellows/Professors / 250 man-months / per year for 3 yearsApproximately 75 individuals for about 3 months Approximately 75 individuals for about 3 months (FP7 will probably allow partial support for Students/Fellows from developing (FP7 will probably allow partial support for Students/Fellows from developing countries??)countries??)Introduction in 2005 of Introduction in 2005 of Physics Teachers Programme for various language Physics Teachers Programme for various language groupsgroups (nationally supported) (nationally supported)Science on StageScience on Stage


Technology TransferTechnology Transfer

2005 shows an increase in activities and results2005 shows an increase in activities and results

Re-establishment in 2005 of an external network with Re-establishment in 2005 of an external network with representatives from all representatives from all Member StatesMember States to increase dissemination to increase dissemination

Creation in 2005 of a Technology Transfer newsletterCreation in 2005 of a Technology Transfer newsletter

Improvement of Technology Transfer databaseImprovement of Technology Transfer database

A vital programmeA vital programme to improve support from Member Statesto improve support from Member States – –

the present (small) increase of external resources allow an increase the present (small) increase of external resources allow an increase of the number of cases of possible transfer to market – of patents -of the number of cases of possible transfer to market – of patents -

More Revenue will (should) come later.More Revenue will (should) come later.


World Summit on Information Society (WSIS)World Summit on Information Society (WSIS)

The World Summit on the Information Society, WSIS, was organised by the The World Summit on the Information Society, WSIS, was organised by the International Telecommunications Union under the patronage of United International Telecommunications Union under the patronage of United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan. The first phase took place in Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan. The first phase took place in Geneva, Switzerland, in December 2003, and the second phase in Tunis in Geneva, Switzerland, in December 2003, and the second phase in Tunis in mid November 2005.mid November 2005.

In CERN/SPC/840, CERN/2551 the participation of CERN to the first phase In CERN/SPC/840, CERN/2551 the participation of CERN to the first phase of WSIS with the of WSIS with the Summit Event named “Role of Science in the Information Summit Event named “Role of Science in the Information Society”Society”and possible derived action items for WSIS II in Tunis were and possible derived action items for WSIS II in Tunis were described:described:

Participation in the Participation in the Working Group of Internet-governanceWorking Group of Internet-governance(in particular to pay attention to the GRID governance)(in particular to pay attention to the GRID governance)

Organisation (with ITU and UNU Sept 25-27 2005) of a Organisation (with ITU and UNU Sept 25-27 2005) of a Workshop on African Workshop on African Research and Education NetworkingResearch and Education Networking

Extending the reach of GEANTExtending the reach of GEANT Africa@homeAfrica@home=spreading software BOINC worldwide. ex.= large computing =spreading software BOINC worldwide. ex.= large computing

power to investigate Malaria treatment developed by the Swiss Tropical power to investigate Malaria treatment developed by the Swiss Tropical Institute (Basel)Institute (Basel)

Open Access – e-science infrastructureOpen Access – e-science infrastructure


““Science On Stage” Festival at CERNScience On Stage” Festival at CERN21 – 25 November21 – 25 November

The “Science On Stage” festival at CERN took place from 21-25 November, The “Science On Stage” festival at CERN took place from 21-25 November, and had more than and had more than 450 participants450 participants from 27 European countries,from 27 European countries, mostly mostly secondary school teachers in physics, chemistry, and biology. Science On secondary school teachers in physics, chemistry, and biology. Science On Stage is part of the EIROForum programme called Stage is part of the EIROForum programme called “European Science “European Science Teacher Initiative (ESTI)”,Teacher Initiative (ESTI)”, which is co-funded by EIROForum and the EC (from which is co-funded by EIROForum and the EC (from 2005-2008) in the framework of the NUCLEUS project within FP6.2005-2008) in the framework of the NUCLEUS project within FP6.

The “SoS” participants had been selected by winning their respective national The “SoS” participants had been selected by winning their respective national competitions. The SoS festival had three main components: competitions. The SoS festival had three main components: the “science the “science teaching fair”, workshops, and on-stage performancesteaching fair”, workshops, and on-stage performances (including new opera (including new opera “KOSMOS – Opera of the Light”).“KOSMOS – Opera of the Light”).

The next step, in January 2006, will be the launch of the national competitions The next step, in January 2006, will be the launch of the national competitions for “Science On Stage 2”. This 2for “Science On Stage 2”. This 2ndnd festival in the ESTI programme will take festival in the ESTI programme will take place in Grenoble (2-6 April 2007), and will be organised jointly by ESRF and place in Grenoble (2-6 April 2007), and will be organised jointly by ESRF and ILL.ILL.


Open AccessOpen Access

The future of scientific communication,The future of scientific communication, in particular for particle physics in particular for particle physicsRole of CERN = Convention du CERNRole of CERN = Convention du CERN

CERN server = preprints – “yellow reports”CERN server = preprints – “yellow reports” Signature of “Berlin Declaration”Signature of “Berlin Declaration”

CERN Initiative for a tripartite colloquiumCERN Initiative for a tripartite colloquium (7-8 Dec. 2005) (7-8 Dec. 2005) ( Publishers-Funding Agencies-Laboratories)( Publishers-Funding Agencies-Laboratories)

General move to General move to “Open Access”“Open Access”

– (move out of “readers pay” towards “authors pay”, as laboratory (move out of “readers pay” towards “authors pay”, as laboratory sponsorship)sponsorship)

– interest for science spreading, in particular in developing world.interest for science spreading, in particular in developing world.– too large increased cost of publicationtoo large increased cost of publication– how to replace the service given by the present editors (peer how to replace the service given by the present editors (peer

review, archiving)review, archiving)– in particular, public accountability and “accreditation”in particular, public accountability and “accreditation”


Open Access - Next steps for CERN Open Access - Next steps for CERN

We need a clear way forwardWe need a clear way forward– before the end of next yearbefore the end of next year– ready for the LHCready for the LHC

CERN should take a leadCERN should take a lead– for the LHCfor the LHC– for particle physicsfor particle physics

in Europe and world widein Europe and world wide

Two stages towards the new scientific communicationTwo stages towards the new scientific communication– establish a working group (3 months)establish a working group (3 months)

Analysis of the issues with the changeAnalysis of the issues with the changeOptions for the future business modelOptions for the future business model

– Table a “position paper” to ICFATable a “position paper” to ICFACommunity actionCommunity action

7373

ConclusionsConclusions

1.1. You can be proud of progress achieved during 2005. Big You can be proud of progress achieved during 2005. Big challenges remain ahead of us, which will require hard work and challenges remain ahead of us, which will require hard work and full dedication.full dedication.

2.2. CERN Council and Member States (MS) officials have CERN Council and Member States (MS) officials have acknowledged our successful efforts.acknowledged our successful efforts.

• This is the first step to recover their full confidence in CERN which This is the first step to recover their full confidence in CERN which should remain their flagship in fundamental research and the should remain their flagship in fundamental research and the paradigm for European scientific cooperation (FP7).paradigm for European scientific cooperation (FP7).

3.3. In the process of defining a strategy for Particle Physics in In the process of defining a strategy for Particle Physics in Europe, we should encourage the MS to recognize their interest Europe, we should encourage the MS to recognize their interest in defining themselves the future role of CERN, this is:in defining themselves the future role of CERN, this is:

• the logical base for their continuous support and for the benefit of the logical base for their continuous support and for the benefit of the whole communitythe whole community

• a better case than always requesting more resources for our a better case than always requesting more resources for our programme.programme.

4.4. Already, the progress in 2005 has led the MS to agree : Already, the progress in 2005 has led the MS to agree : • on providing the full indexation in their financial contributionson providing the full indexation in their financial contributions• on spending more resources in CERN and providing extra manpower on spending more resources in CERN and providing extra manpower

for LHC commissioning to maintain the schedule in 2007for LHC commissioning to maintain the schedule in 2007

7474

ConclusionsConclusions

5.5. Nevertheless, Nevertheless, the financial situation of CERN is the financial situation of CERN is “incredibly “incredibly critical”critical”

• by the end of 2006, all debts on CERN budget are 1.5 x annual by the end of 2006, all debts on CERN budget are 1.5 x annual budgetbudget............a level not acceptable to any Firm or Statea level not acceptable to any Firm or State

• planned large debt reimbursement between 2008 and 2011 will not planned large debt reimbursement between 2008 and 2011 will not allow allow any new developmentany new development in CERN to prepare for future in CERN to prepare for future programme after 2010programme after 2010..............a situation not reasonable in anybody’s eyesa situation not reasonable in anybody’s eyes

• full recovery of MS confidence should allow a plea for extra resources full recovery of MS confidence should allow a plea for extra resources … Research Ministers will be personally contacted… Research Ministers will be personally contacted

6.6. In matter of scientific strategyIn matter of scientific strategy, we will have clear views in , we will have clear views in summer 2006 on summer 2006 on our preferred optionsour preferred options to prepare for the future to prepare for the future

• it will be nice if the Community and the MS just instruct us to work it will be nice if the Community and the MS just instruct us to work precisely in these directions and the Council provides the needed precisely in these directions and the Council provides the needed resourcesresources

• irreversible decisionsirreversible decisions on new large investments for a future on new large investments for a future programme programme should wait for convincing results from LHC should wait for convincing results from LHC operationoperation

7575

ConclusionsConclusions7.7. LHC construction and consolidation remain the undisputable priorityLHC construction and consolidation remain the undisputable priority

• technical issues have been resolvedtechnical issues have been resolved• logistics will continue to provide everyday challengeslogistics will continue to provide everyday challenges• preparation of commissioning is ongoingpreparation of commissioning is ongoing• (always a little concern about the reliability of our old equipment!)(always a little concern about the reliability of our old equipment!)

• No show stopper in principle to prevent the schedule of first beam collisions in summer 2007No show stopper in principle to prevent the schedule of first beam collisions in summer 2007• We should make all efforts to maintain this scheduleWe should make all efforts to maintain this schedule . . • After implementation of all planned improvements, we will review the planning and schedule for After implementation of all planned improvements, we will review the planning and schedule for

the summer 2006the summer 2006

8.8. In 2006, conclusion of the 5-Yearly Review and the new Human Resources Plan will In 2006, conclusion of the 5-Yearly Review and the new Human Resources Plan will prepare CERN to be ready for a successful future : LHC operation and a new prepare CERN to be ready for a successful future : LHC operation and a new programme planprogramme planIn 2006, the Pension Fund issues should be clearedIn 2006, the Pension Fund issues should be cleared

1.1. Comparisons with similar Pension FundsComparisons with similar Pension Funds should provide examples for solutions of similar should provide examples for solutions of similar structural difficultiesstructural difficulties

2.2. New accepted rules should confirm the employer's duty to support social contributions New accepted rules should confirm the employer's duty to support social contributions simultaneously with salaries (no more debt) – and give everyone confidence in a simultaneously with salaries (no more debt) – and give everyone confidence in a realistic future realistic future for his/her pensionfor his/her pension

9.9. Activities in CERN which complement research are highly valued and praised by MS. We Activities in CERN which complement research are highly valued and praised by MS. We should “sell” them efficiently…more benefits expected … from only a small fraction of our should “sell” them efficiently…more benefits expected … from only a small fraction of our resources.resources.

10.10. Bon courage!Bon courage!

Documents

Overview of CERN Activities in 2005 Strategy for CERN Future 12 January 2006 R. Aymar