Overview of 2016 State Accountability,

TELPAS, Graduation Rate, SAT, ACT, Advanced Placement, and

Dual Credit

Dr. Curtis NullOctober 18, 2016

Special Thanks to the Team

Dr. Chris Hines – Deputy Superintendent of Operations

Jim Kacur – Assistant Superintendent of Secondary Education

Dr. Debbie Phillips – Assistant Superintendent of Elementary Education

Shellie Winkler – Director of Elementary Education

Dayren Carlisle – Coordinator of Bilingual and ESL

Denise Cipolla – Coordinator of Guidance and Counseling

Debbie McNeely – Coordinator for Advanced Academic Programs

Dr. Julie English – Director of Assessment and Evaluation

Greg Shipp – Coordinator of Career and Technical Education

Veronica Martin Perkins – College Readiness Specialist

Isabel López – Secretary for the Deputy Superintendent of Schools

Student Achievement

Index I

Student Progress

Index 2

Closing Performance

Gaps

Index 3

Postsecondary Readiness

Index 4

Index 1: Student Achievement provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students.

Subjects: Combined over Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.

Student Groups: All Students and all versions of the test

Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II

Index 1: Student Achievement

Target Score

60

85

75

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

District State

Index 1: Student Achievement

Index 2: Student Progress

Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners.

By Subject Area: Reading and Mathematics for available grades.

Credit based on weighted performance: One point credit given for each percentage of students at the Met growth expectations level. Two point credit given for each percentage of students at the Exceeded growth expectations level.

Index 2 - Student Progress

Target Score

22

4240

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

District State

Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps

Credit based on weighted performance:

One point for each percent of students at the Level II - Satisfactory performance standard.

Two points for each percent of students at the Level III - Advanced performance standard.

By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.

Student Groups

Socioeconomic: Economically Disadvantaged

Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity: Up to two of the lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups on the campus or district (based on prior-year assessment results).

Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and up to the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups.

Index 3- Closing Performance Gaps

46

39

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

District State

Target Score

28

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the importance for students to receive a high school diploma that provides them with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school. Postsecondary Readiness calculates all the following for the All Student group and all students grouped by race/ethnicity, ELL status and special education status.

STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level II on two or more tests (unless only one taken) Graduation Score – Combined performance across the graduation and dropout rates for:

Grade 9-12 Four or Five Year Graduation Ratewhichever contributes the higher number of points to the Index.

Graduation Plan Score – Based on a cohort of students. Two percentages are calculated:The percentage of students graduating under the RHSP or the DAPThe percentage of students graduating under either the RHSP/DAP or the FHSP-E or the DLAwhichever contributes the higher number of points to the Index.

Postsecondary Readiness Component – College and Career Ready Graduates1. Meet TSI Criteria in both ELA and math on the TSI, SAT or ACT; or2. Complete and receive credit for at least TWO advanced/dual enrollment courses; or3. Enroll in a CTE Coherent Sequence of courses as part of a four-year plan of study to take two or more CTE course for three or more credits

Index 4 – Postsecondary Readiness

8075

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

District State

Target Score

60

System Safeguards

Apply Safeguards to Specific Performance Indexes:

Reporting system will disaggregate performance by student group and subject area.

Performance rates are calculated from the assessment results used to calculate performance rates in the performance index (Index 1).

Target for the disaggregated results are:

STAAR performance target corresponds to Index 1 (60%),

STAAR participation target required by federal accountability (95%),

Federal graduation rate targets and improvement calculations for4-year rate (83%) and 5-year rate (88%),

Federal limit on use of alternate assessments (1% and 2%).

System Safeguards

77 of 84 met = 92% Special Education

Performance Reading, Math, Writing, Science, Social Studies

ELL Performance

Writing and Social Studies

District Distinctions

33%

39%

21%

17%

31%

9%

7%

13%

6%

18%

6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

2016 Postsecondary Readiness ResultsPercent of Eligible Measures in Top Quartile

Possible Campus Distinction Designations

Top 25% Student Progress

Top 25% Closing Achievement Gaps

Post-Secondary Readiness

Academic - Reading/English Language Arts, Mathematics, Social Studies and Science

Distinction Designation Targets Elementary, Intermediate and Jr. High school campuses in the top quartile on at least

50% of their eligible measures are qualified to receive a distinction designation for that subject area.

High schools in the top quartile on at least 33% of their eligible measures are qualified to receive a distinction designation for that subject area.

Campus Distinction Designations

Campus Distinction Designations

38%

43%

25%

13%

33%

15%

8%

13% 13%14%

9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Percentage of Eligible Distinctions Earned

Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System - TELPAS

4 language domains Listening

Speaking

Reading

Writing

4 proficiency levels Beginning

Intermediate

Advanced

Advanced High

TELPAS is part of an ESSA accountability system for ELLs. States must show annual increases in the progress ELLs make in learning English and attaining proficiency.

Key Features of Each Proficiency Level

Beginning Little or no English ability

Intermediate Limited ability, simple language structures,

high-frequency vocabulary, routine contexts

Advanced Grade appropriate, with second language acquisition support

Advanced High Grade appropriate, with minimal second language acquisition

support

Year Grade Level/

Number of Students

Conroe ISD TELPAS Composite Rating Spring 2016 Results Percent of students in each rating

Beginning Intermediate Advanced Advanced High

K / 850 51 34 11 4

1st / 1001 17 37 30 16

2nd / 991 11 34 38 18

3rd / 905 7 22 44 27

4th / 836 6 15 45 34

5th / 703 5 13 40 41

6th / 552 5 14 50 31

7th / 459 5 9 44 41

8th / 342 6 17 41 35

9th / 289 10 22 49 19

10th / 242 17 17 44 23

11th / 151 2 16 42 40

12th / 127 2 15 44 39

Conroe ISD TELPAS Comparison% of students who progressed from 1 or more proficiency levels

2014-2015 2015-2016

Kinder to 1st Grade 61 54.2

1st to 2nd Grade 26 29.9

2nd to 3rd Grade 28 27.4

3rd to 4th Grade 20 23

4th to 5th Grade 20 32

5th to 6th Grade 15 17

6th to 7th Grade 13 19.4

7th to 8th Grade 19 20.5

8th to 9th Grade 8 16.7

9th to 10th Grade 13 16.9

10 to 11th Grade 19 17

11th to 12th Grade 3 20.5

Grade Level

Conroe ISD STAAR Spanish Spring 2016 Results

Reading % Met Standard Level

II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested

Writing% Met Standard Level

II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested

Math% Met Standard Level

II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested

Science% Met Standard Level

II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested

3rd 56% / 227 46% / 127

4th 57% / 138 58% / 142 60% / 119

5th 66% / 65 37% / 59 46% / 56

Grade Level

STATE STAAR Spanish Spring 2016 Results

Reading % Met Standard Level

II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested

Writing% Met Standard Level

II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested

Math% Met Standard Level

II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested

Science% Met Standard Level

II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested

3rd 64% / 36, 396 63% / 17, 330

4th 57% / 24, 270 66% / 25, 192 56% / 9,384

5th 63% / 12, 991 47% / 4, 610 50% / 7, 287

STAAR Performance of Reclassified Students Spring 2016

Grade Reading Math Science Writing

3rd 99% 98%

4th 100% 95% 89%

5th 96% 91% 92%

6th 87% 91%

7th 86% 65% 78%

8th 93% 76%

Grades 9-12 STAAR EOC Performance Satisfactory (Met Level II) Monitor Year 1

Algebra I Biology English I English II US History

82% 97% 62% 73% 100%

Grades 3-8 STAAR Performance Satisfactory (Met Level II) of Monitor Year 1

Grades 3-8 STAAR Performance Satisfactory (Met Level II) of Monitor Year 2

Grade Reading Math Writing

3rd 97% 96%

4th 99% 97% 92%

5th 96% 96% 100%

6th 91% 84%

7th 92% 73% 81%

8th 79% 85%

Grades 9-12 STAAR EOC Performance Satisfactory (Met Level II) Monitor Year 2

Algebra I Biology English I English II US History

77% 85% 63% 58% 100%

STAAR Performance of Reclassified Students Spring 2016

Graduation Rate Trend

86.30%

89.30%

93.20%92.30% 92.50%

94.20%95.50% 95.10% 94.70%

95.70%

80.40%

78%79.10%

80.60%

84.30%85.90%

87.70% 88% 88.30% 89.00%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

CISD Texas

Class of 2014

94.70%

1.00%

2.90%

1.40%

Conroe ISD

Graduated Received GED Continued Dropped Out

88.30%

0.80%

4.30%

6.60%

Texas

Graduated Received GED Continued Dropped Out

Graduation Plans

4.63% 5.07% 4.56% 4.90%1.60% 3.39% 4.01% 6.31% 7.31%

69.18% 71.30% 71.94%75.73% 80.76% 79.40%

81.61%83.08% 82.00%

26.19% 23.62% 23.50%19.37% 17.64% 17.20% 14.39%

10.60% 10.69%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

CISD 10-Year Trend: Percentage of Graduation Plans

Minimum Program Recommended High School Program Distinguished Achievement Program

89.03%

2.56%

8.41%

2014

Minimum Program

Foundations Program

Recommended/ DAP

2016 SAT Performance

494

508

482

466

478

449

521

535

500

420

440

460

480

500

520

540

560

Critical Reading Math Writing

National

Texas

Conroe ISD

SAT Trend

1084 1082 1084

1069 1069

10511061 1065

1075

1056

999993 988 987

981973 976 972

956

934

1017 1017 1013 1015 1011 1010 1010 1010 1006 1002

850

900

950

1000

1050

1100

1150

SAT Combined Critical Reading and Math Trend

Conroe ISD

State

National

SAT Participation

16521708

1515

1812

1959

2129 2109

2202

21292165

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2200

2400

SAT Number of Students Tested Trend

National Merit Competition

16

23

27

2018

3231

23

27

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35National Merit Semifinalists 2007-2015

20.1 20.6

21.3 20.8 20.8

19.4

20.721 20.7 20.6

22.123.3 23.7 23.1 23.2

0

5

10

15

20

25

English Math Reading Science Composite

2016 ACT Results

National

Texas

Conroe ISD

2016 ACT

ACT Trend

22.9

23.3

23.2 23.2

23.4

23.7

22.9

23.3

23.5

24.1

23.2

22.2

22.4

22.6

22.8

23

23.2

23.4

23.6

23.8

24

24.2

Act Composite Test Trend

14% increase in number of test takers

22.3

22.622.5 22.5 22.5

22.9

22

22.4

22.6

23.3

22.1

22.6

23.823.9

24.1 24.1

24.3

23.7

23.924

24.3

23.3

23

23.4

23.223.1

23.5

23.8

23

23.6

23.8

24.4

23.7

22.2

22.8

22.6 22.6

23

23.3

22.6

22.8

23.2

23.8

23.1

20.5

21

21.5

22

22.5

23

23.5

24

24.5

25ACT Subjet Test Trend

English

Math

Reading

Science

ACT Trend

ACT College Readiness

19 2022

24 24 2426 26 27 26

3735 36

4143

3842 43

51

44

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

ACT College Readiness Trend: Percent Meeting All Four Subjects

TX Meeting All Four CISD Meeting All Four

Advanced Placement Exams

4046

5167 53245538

6094

6525

7588

8009

91559386

1960

2410 24322604 2735

30043324

3633

41214377

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

CISD Ten Year AP Trend: Students and Tests

Number of test Number of Students

2016 AP Mean Scores

2.87

2.51

2.85

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

CISD Texas National

Top Advanced Placement Exams TakenSubject Number of Tests Taken

Human Geography 918

U.S. Government and Politics 822

World History 806

U.S. History 679

Psychology 565

English Language and Composition 557

Macroeconomics 526

English Literature and Composition 490

Physics 1 474

Biology 457

Statistics 422

Calculus AB 380

Environmental Science 348

Spanish Language 340

Dual Credit with Lone Star College

English1301

English 1302

English2332

English2333

History1301

History1302

Math 1314Spring Only

Govt. 2305Speech

1315

Campus TotalsF/S

Total 786 760 335 252 493 440 73 128 15

1742/1540

3282

Lone Star College Fall Dual Credit Enrollment Trend

950

842 842

729

957 959

1807

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Lone Star College Work Force Programs

Program Welding Phlebotomy

Computer Numeric Controls

Operation and Programming

Auto

Technology

Emergency

Medical

Technician

Enrollment 13 27 5 5 15

CTE Certifications EarnedCertification Number of certs. Certification Number of certs.

MOS Office Word 2013 260 Pharmacy Tech 9

MOS Office Excel 2013 119 SolidWorks Associate 6

MOS Office One Note 4 Cosmetology Operator License 28

MOS Office Power Point 2013 35 CPR/First Aid/AED 75

MOS Office Outlook 2013 5Early Childhood AAFCS National

Certificate3

MOS Office Access 2013 13 NCCER Level 1 Welding 6

MOS Office Word 2013 Expert Pt 1 35 OSHA 10 HR 221

MOS Office Word 2013 Expert Pt 2 25 Pre-PAC Education Fundamentals 4

MOS Office Excel 2013 Expert Pt1 19 ServeSafe Food Handlers 203

MOS Office Excel 2013 Expert Pt2 13 ServSafeManagers 1

AutoCAD Certified User 19 Tx Park & Wildlife Hunter Education 25

Autodesk Inventor Certified User 1 TSFA Floral 4

CCEI Child Care Education 10

TVMA Certified Veterinary Assistant Level 1

7

CGSP – Certified Guest Services Professional 3 Total Certifications 1153

Plans After Graduation from High School: (Students can provide more than one response.)

2%

3%

7%

8%

1%

26%

53%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Other

Military

Work part time

Work full time

Voc/Tech School

2 Year College

4 Year College

4-Year Universities

53

98

22

181

12

50

57

75

28

11

107

21

74

10

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Baylor

Sam Houston State University

Stephen F. Austin University

Texas A&M

Teas Christian University

Texas State University

Texas Tech

University of Houston

University of Oklahoma

University of Texas-Arlington

University of Texas-Austin

University of Texas- Dallas

University of Texas-San Antonio

Louisiana State University

Class of 2015 College Attended