OVERVIEW CURRENT PROJECT OUTLINE IDEAS - … · · 2015-05-04OVERVIEW CURRENT PROJECT OUTLINE IDEAS . ... supply chain) • Tool support for ... (MDH) No answer yet • Partners

Paulweber, Armengaud AVL List GesmbH

OVERVIEW CURRENT PROJECT OUTLINE IDEAS

ECSEL CALL 2015

Where to find information for ECSEL Call 2015

ECSEL Consortium Building Event April 14th / 15th, 2015 - Brussels

2

ECSEL 2015 CALL(s)


3

TRL (Technology Readiness Level) Definitions: see ECSEL 2015 Work Plan


4

Milestones in ECSEL 2015 Call


5

EU + Austrian Reimbursement Rates (“Funding”)


6

Unified overhead rate: 1.25

25% + 25%

40% + 40% 40% + 40%

30% + 30% 25% + 25%

15% + 15% Potentially 20% + 20%

ECSEL CONSORTIUM BUILDING EVENT Apr 14th, 2015 – Brussels

http://www.ecsel.eu/web/events/partner_presentations.php


7




8




9

Michael Paulweber [email protected] [email protected]

ECSEL Proposal Outline draft

ENABLE-S3

European Initiative to Enable Validation for Highly Automated Safe and Secure Systems

mailto:[email protected]


Facts and Milestones

Type of Proposal: Innovation Action (IA) Target TRL of proposal : 5 – 6 Total IA funding in ECSEL call: 90 M€ EU, 90 M€ national funding 2 Phase call (PO mandatory):

– Deadline for Project outline: May 12th, 2015 17:00 (Brussel time)

– Result from PO Evaluation: Beginning of June 2015

– Full project proposal: Sep 08th, 2015 17:00 (Brussel time)


11

European Initiative to Enable Validation for Highly Automated Safe and Secure Systems ENABLE-S3

Highly automated systems will help to solve many societal challenges

– Automatic vehicles gives mobility to the aging society, enable fatality free mobility and CO2 reductions

– Unmanned aerial vehicles help to protect the environment in identifying problems

– Automated ground traffic for airports enable efficiency improvements and help to prevent accidents

– Automated surgery allows to heal new diseases – Higher automation in buildings will increase safety and security – …


2

Unsolved problems: - Automated systems have to work safely in uncountable environmental conditions and

scenarios - Validation in real-world too time consuming - Validation in real-world too dangerous (e.g. automated operations)

Project Summary of Innovation Action ENABLE-S3

• Drastically reduction of validation of highly automated systems

• Safety and security validation using virtual environments

• OEM use case driven project • Demonstrators from

– Aerospace, – Maritime, – Rail, – Automotive, – Health

ECSEL Consortium Building Event

April 14th / 15th, 2015 - Brussels 13

Expected impacts ENABLE-S3

– Validation in virtual environments removes one important blocker of industrialization

– Enable hugh ECS market for automated systems (automotive: 50 B€)

– Decreases validation time of automated system by 60 % – European industry trained to new validation platform by

use cases

– Cooperation with validation competence centers to help SMEs enter new business domain

– Cooperation with standardization bodies to stimulate attractive tool market (reduce tool costs by 50 %)


14

Consortium ENABLE-S3

• Present consortium in brief – Approx. # of partner: 70 – Coordinator: AVL – Countries: 14

• Partners needed to complete consortium: – SMEs


15

Huáscar Espinoza, Ph.D. TECNALIA

ECSEL Proposal Outline draft

AMASS

Architecture-driven, Multi-concern and Seamless

Assurance and Certification of Cyber-Physical Systems


16

Project objectives refinement

17

Inputs Received TECNALIA

FBK AIT

UC3M TRC

Intecs TAS-E MDH

HONEYWELL GMV

Eclipse Foundation Europe (EFE)

1. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE-DRIVEN ASSURANCE • Architectural patterns for Assurance (AUTOSAR, IMA) • Seamless link to System Modeling (Behavior, Safety, Timing,…) • Reinforce Contract-based Approach, including requirements refinement,

safety analysis, and verification based on formal methods. • Formalize behavioral & safety requirements to enable automatic validation • Assurance of Specific Technology: NoC, Multicore, Reconfigurable

2. MULTICONCERN ASSURANCE • Multi-concerns Assurance Cases (dependability, costs, etc.) • Security+Safety holistic approach for risk levels • Process-based + product based assurance • Combine Product lines w/ safety-oriented process lines and safety case lines • Extension of Compositional approach for multi-concern assurance • Methodological support and guidelines • Standard’s text analysis for compliance management

3. SEAMLESS INTEROPERABILITY • Tool Integration (e.g. OSLC). Consider Crystal as basis • Integration with CHESS • Collaborative work (seamless support for tool stakeholders from the whole

supply chain) • Tool support for Impact Analysis (safety analyses what ifs, etc.)

Non-technical objectives refinement

18

Industry R&D

Assessment Entities,

Standards

OPENCOSS + SafeCer

Long-lasting channel for technology transfer, users involvement

Case Studies (Real Environment)

Standardization Actions

Reference Architecture

Community Building

(Polarsys)

A common infrastructure and methodology (conceptual and

implementation) to handle safety assurance artifacts

An open community to facilitate innovation acceptance and industrial consensus building

Pre-normative activities

App Domains: • Aerospace

• Space • Automotive

• Railway • Health?

Consortium

19

Participant no. * Participant organisation name Part. short name

Country

1 TECNALIA TEC Spain 2 Honeywell (Aerospace) HON Czech Republic 3 Siemens (Automotive) SIE Germany 4 ikv++ Technologies AG IKV Germany 5 MDH (University) MDH Sweden 6 Eclipse Foundation ECL Germany 7 Infineon (Automotive) IFX Germany 8 AIT AIT Austria 9 Fondazione Bruno Kessler FBK Italy 10 Intecs INT Italy 11 Berner&Mattner BAM Germany 12 GMV GMV Spain 13 RINA RIN Italy 14 Thales Alenia Space (Space) TAS Spain 15 Universidad Carlos III UC3 Spain 16 Rapita Systems RAS UK 17 REUSE Company TRC Spain 18 Safety Integrity SIS Sweden 19 Masaryk University UOM Czech Republic

Potential Partners

20

• Thales Alenia Space – France (TASE Spain in charge) • Thales Railway – Austria (AIT) Waiting approval • AVL – Austria (AIT) Waiting approval • Thales RT + Avionics – France (TEC) TRT interested • Magnetti Marelli – Italy (INT in charge) • CRF – Italy (INT) Interested • Rapita – UK (TEC in charge) DONE • ULMA – Spain (TEC in charge) No, for the moment • Certif company – Spain (AIT) No, for the moment • VOLVO Trucks (MDH) No answer yet • Partners from Nuclear domain (MDH) Cancelled • Bombardier (MDH will explore) No answer yet • Partners from Health (TEC to explore). Philips interested, asking management • Airbus Aircraft: Pierre Gaufillet ([email protected]) / Laurent Duffau

([email protected]) • Airbus Defence and Space: Alain Rossignol ([email protected])/ David Lessens

([email protected]) • Thales: ([email protected]) for integration with Capella (in this context, they are

more techno providers) • Philippe BAUFRETON, Research Program Manager, Sagem - SAFRAN Electronics

Lead Partner Country Status TEC Spain Closed? HON Czech Republic Closed IKV Germany ? MDH Sweden Ongoing AIT Austria Ongoing INT Italy Ongoing RAS UK Ongoing PHI The Netherlands Ongoing X France -

21.04.2015 Tbd Alois Knoll [email protected]

EMCROSS European Multicore Cross-Domain Architecture

Proposal for an ECSEL IA-Project Core Team WebEx


Key partners to get started

WP Title Leader/ Co-ordinator Co-Leader E-Mails Key Participants Leader Co-leader Industry Unis / RTOs

1 Project management and control fortiss [email protected] Thales, ST, Sagem

2

Requirements and use case definition incl. Certification SAAB / Valeo ? Offis [email protected]

[email protected] [email protected]

e

2.1 Automotive Domain VALEO ? VIF [email protected] Renault, VIF,

2.2 Avionics Domain Thales / SAAB / Honeywell [email protected]

[email protected]

2.3 Rail Domain Thales Austria IESE [email protected] [email protected]

er.de

2.4 Space Domain TAS [email protected]

3 Multicore Concept and System ST-Microelectronics IMEC ? [email protected] Tobias.Gemmeke@imec-

nl.nl

4 Hardware Approach SAFRAN KIT [email protected] [email protected]

[email protected]

4.1 MC Chip ST

4.2 FPGA

4.3

5 Software Approach Thales TRT TU Vienna [email protected]

[email protected]

Honeywell, SYSGO,AVL, ISEP

6 Processes, methods, tool support

incl. RTP implementation OFFIS PTC ? [email protected] [email protected]

7 Demonstrators and Testbeds AVL (E. Armangaud) VIF [email protected] [email protected]

7.1 Automotive

7.2 Avionics Thales Avionics /SAAB/

7.3 Rail Thales Austria

7.4 Space TAS [email protected]

8 Dissemination, Exploitation,

Standardisation HUA George Dimitrakopoulos, <[email protected]> [email protected]

EMCROSS Project Building V6 22









MISSION STATEMENT EMCROSS • Certifiable systems based on multicore technology are on the critical path of any

future highly automated systems. • Degree of automation will directly depend on embedded computing power. • The basic technologies are available, but far from a format sufficient to address

certifiability requirements, as defined for the different application domains. • Based on results of former projects, the intention of the EMCROSS project is to

define a set of agreed requirements for certifiability, leading to reference architectures, processes, and tools with the objective of obtaining an industrially exploitable/useable solution.

• Interleaved goals of this project: One chip for dedicated solution to demonstrate certifiability. Framework of seamlessly integrated processes, tool chains, and devices

that are supporting the use of multicore technology for operational industrial and safety critical applications.

• Demonstrators: The results shall be demonstrated through practical examples from industrial use cases.


HW solution: New or modified Multicore processor Implementing certifiable architecture

Implementation of proven architecture in FPGA, using performant cores

Software support Build on state-of-the-art

to support use of MC

Certifiable multicore processor approach for mixed criticality applications

Overview Proposed Project

Based on existing results of former projects: 2 work streams in parallel


Updated Project Organization: V6 (21.04.2015)


Governing board: make project wide decision. Is composed with key sponsors of the project-> program representatives Technical comittee: follow-up project technical work, propose decision to governing board -> WP leaders and TPC leader Certification authorities link: In charge of diffusing certification constraints and spirit towards project WPs (highly transverse) -> technical experts representatives from their companies to certif authorities Advisory Committee: Representatives of key OEMs, Tier-1s, FPGA suppliers

WP2: Requirements and use case definition

WP 3: Multi-core HW / SW concept for certification and trade-off

WP6 :

Methodology and tools for certification;

tool support

WP7: Demonstrators and Test beds: Platform integration & domain evaluation

WP8:

Communication, Dissemination, Exploitation,

Standardization

WP1: Management and Control governing board, technical committee, link to certification authorities link,

2.1 Automotive 2.2 Avionic 2.3 Rail 2.4 Space

7.1 Automotive 7.2 Avionic 7.3 Rail 7.4 Space

WP4 : HW reference

architecture definition for certification &

prototype

WP5 : SW reference

architecture definition for certification &

prototype

Advisory Committee

Certification Authorities

Context, Time Line and Next Steps

• Project to be submitted as Innovation Action (IA) in next ECSEL Call 2015; Submission under “Technologies”

• Project Leader: To be identified • ECSEL call open: 17.03.2015 (WP2015

available) • Submission of Project Outline: May 12th, 2015

17h (Brussels time) • Results of PO review to coordinators: 15.06.2015 • Submission of Full Proposal: Sep 8th, 2015 17h • Results of FP review: ca. 12/2015 • Start of project: ca. 03/2016








Documents

OVERVIEW CURRENT PROJECT OUTLINE IDEAS - … · · 2015-05-04OVERVIEW CURRENT PROJECT OUTLINE IDEAS . ... supply chain) • Tool support for ... (MDH) No answer yet • Partners