Upload
conley
View
46
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Air and water based normalization of single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy measurements: How is it comparing to normalization based on diffuse reflectance standards?. Nigar Sultana 1 , Kenneth E. Bartels 2 , G. Reed Holyoak 2 , Daqing Piao 1 and Jerry W. Ritchey 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Air and water based normalization of single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy measurements: How is it comparing to normalization based
on diffuse reflectance standards?
Nigar Sultana1, Kenneth E. Bartels2, G. Reed Holyoak 2 , Daqing Piao1 and Jerry W. Ritchey 3
1School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA2Depertment of Veterinary Clinical Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA3Depertment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
Overview• Background
• Motivation
• System configuration
• Calibration method
• Results
• Summery
Background• Reflectance spectroscopy using single fiber has great implication on in
vivo studies to determine tissue optical properties
• Single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy (SfRS) generally requires a normalization of the spectral measurements in order to isolate the medium-related light scattering and absorption
• For normalization procedure to conduct, two samples of known optical properties are required
• In recent times, diffuse reflectance standards are used for normalization process and 2%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 99% reflactance standards are available from spectralon
Motivation• When measuring optical properties of tisse in vivo, fiber tip becomes
contaminated by tissue contact which affects the measurement
• For several set of normalized data collection from each sample tissue, fiber tip must have to be very cleaned before every measurement
• Due to damping of source, the source condition vary with time and data taken long before is no longer usable to conduct normalization with in time taken data
• It is exteremly hard to maintain same fiber condition for in time measurement with reflectance standard
Motivation• To reduce backscattering, fiber tip to be angle polished, which
makes it even more complicated to make fiber tip in contact with the flat surface of reflectance standards
• Without proper allignment and dark condition maitained, the measurement cannot be accurate
• A convenint, available and repeatitively used samples for normalization process is needed to overcome the challenges of reflactance standard
Objective
• The objective of this study is to determine samples (air and water) other than reflectance standard that is compatible to normalization process
• If normalization using air and water could provide better performance than normalized with reflection standards
7
System configuration
Computer
Light Source Spectrometer
The experimental setup includes:
Halogen -Deuterium Source
Spectrometer
Bifurcated fiber bundle
320μm single fiber with 15°
angle polished tip
Computer
150 angle polished fiber
Schematic of Single fiber reflectance spectroscopy setup
single fiber
Bifurcated fiber bundle
15°
System configuration
Angular and vertical-horizontal moveable setup to take measurements from calibration standard
single fiber
Calibration standard
Calibration Method
Rair ( λ ) = ηc· ηfib/airS(λ ) + ηintS ( λ )
Rwater ( λ ) = ηc· ηfib/waterS(λ ) + ηintS ( λ )
Rair = Reflectance spectra of airRwater = Reflectance spectra of waterS = System level native spectral profileηc = collection efficiency of fiberηfib/x = fresnel reflection at fiber/medium
Calibration Method
Rtissue ( λ ) = ηc{ exp[-(λ)⟨L⟩] S ( λ ) +ηfib/tissueS(λ )} + ηintS ( λ )
Rtissue = Reflectance spectra of air = reduced scattering coefficient = absorption coefficientL = path length
= fiber diameter, fitting parameter
Calibration Method= Normalized spectrum of tissue with respect to air and water
Rtissue ( λ ) =
Neglecting due to closeness of refractive index, and denoting ,
Rtissue ( λ ) =
Rx%= Reflectance spectra of x% reflectance standard
Calibration Method
Results• Reflectance standards of 10%, 20%,
40%, 60%, 80% and 99% are normalized with respect to 5% and 2% reflectance and again with respect to air and water
• Normalized result for 650nm wavelength is presented against percentage of reflectance
• Normalization result for calibration standards are the same for normalized with air and water, with only difference in scaling factor 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Relectance Standard (%)
Nor
mal
ized
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
Norm with standardNorm with air & water
Results• Intralipid test is performed for 0.02% to
1% concentrated intralipid
• 50 sets of Single fiber reflectance spectroscopy (SfRS) data was taken by varying intralipid concentration with each time increase in concentration to 0.02%
• 50 data points of Normalized scattering intensity with respect to calibration standards of 80% and 2% at 632.8 nm plotted against the known value of
• While fitted with test data, it gives a coefficient of determination 0.9970 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
µs’ (mm-1)
Spe
ctra
l Int
ensity
R2=0.9970
Normalized intensity reach 0 when is 0 NO
Results• Same intralipid test is performed by
normalizing with respect to air and water
• Normalized scattering intensity at 632.8 nm plotted against the known value of
• While fitted with simple geometric model, it gives a coefficient of determination 0.9963
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.20
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
µs’ (mm-1)
Spe
ctra
l Int
ensity
R2=0.9963
Normalized intensity reach 0 when is 0 YES
Summery• To identify other samples rather than calibration standard, this study was
performed
• Normalization related to Single fiber reflectance spectroscopy with respect to air and water is compared with normalization with respect to reflectance standard
• At a certain wavelength of 650 nm, the normalized intensity using air and water reflects the same result as with reflectance standards
• Spectral intensity of intralipid normalized with respect to air and water shows a correct trend to reach zero, while normalized with respect to reflectance standard not reachable to zero