Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Overcoming Barriers to Low Vision Rehabilitation Alexis G. Malkin, OD, FAAO
12 May 2020
No relevant disclosures
Setting the Stage• General shortage of low vision (LV) rehabilitation
services • Growing need with increasing incidence/prevalence of
LV• Challenges to providing LV: aging population with
reduced insurance reimbursement rates, long chair time and historically high no-show rates.
• Additional challenges: practitioner comfort level with integrating low vision
• Goal is to create a LV rehabilitation model that can be adapted for every community
Defining Low Vision• Permanently impaired vision in both eyes that causes
functional limitations• Can be defined in terms of visual acuity in the better
seeing eye (may also be defined in terms of visual field loss)
• Can be congenital or acquired
35/13/2020
International Definition of LV• Mild – presenting visual acuity worse than 6/12• Moderate – presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18• Severe – presenting visual acuity worse than 6/60• Blindness – presenting visual acuity worse than 3/60
45/13/2020
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment
Defining LVR• Low Vision: Vision loss which cannot be corrected by
medical treatment, surgical treatment or conventional eyeglasses(American Academy of Ophthalmology)
• Low Vision Rehabilitation: A multidisciplinary approach to improving visual function and maintaining independence– Team members may include:
• Optometrist, low vision therapist, occupational therapist, orientation and mobility specialist, teacher of the visually impaired, primary care physician, psychologist/psychiatrist, local agencies
55/13/2020
Preferred Practice Patterns• Provide low vision services or refer for low vision
services if a patient has reduced BCVA of 20/40 or worse, central scotoma/metamorphopsia, reduced contrast sensitivity, visual field loss or functional vision difficulties
• American Academy of Ophthalmology
65/13/2020
Defining the Problem
6/12 6/18 6/60
Prevalence Rates of LV in the US
Massof, OVS, 2002
Defining the Problem: LV provider shortage
• Providers are only serving 15-20% of low vision patient need in the regions that have been studied (MD/DC/DE, MA and TN)
• Providers include:– optometrists– ophthalmologists– occupational therapists– orientation and mobility specialists– others
Defining the Problem: Who are the LV Patients?
Most cases of low vision in the United States are caused by age-related eye diseases:– Macular degeneration (59%)– Diabetic Retinopathy and
other retinal vascular diseases (11%)
– Glaucoma (10%)– Cataract (5%)
Defining the Problem: Who are the LV Patients?
Goldstein, Arch Ophthal, 2012
Visual Acuity of LV Patients
Goldstein, Arch Ophthal, 2012
Self-reported Vision Status vs. Visual Acuity
Goldstein, Arch Ophthal, 2012
145/13/2020
Prevalence rates of LV in India• Dandona et al (2002) studied prevalence rates in
Southern India• Prevalence was ~1%• Most common causes: retinal disease (1/3), amblyopia,
optic atrophy, glaucoma, and corneal diseases• Higher prevalence with increasing age• Higher prevalence with decreasing socioeconomic status• Higher prevalance has been noted when studies report
on both treatable and untreatable causes
155/13/2020
Prevalence rates of LV in India
165/13/2020
Prevalence rates by age
175/13/2020
Pediatric Low Vision• Accounts for larger number of years per patient of vision
impairment• Common causes: toxoplasmosis, optic atrophy, cerebral visual
impairment, optic nerve hypoplasia, retinal dystrophies, dominant optic atrophy
• A multidisciplinary and collaborative approach is essential. Including members such as:
• TVI- Teacher of the Visually Impaired• OT- Occupational Therapist• O&M Specialist – Orientation and Mobility
Pediatric Low Vision in India• Cross-sectional Study from LVP reviewed records of 220
pediatric patients presenting for LVR• 49% were moderately impaired, 31% severely impaired,
and 20% were blind• Causes were: congenital glaucoma, hereditary macular
degeneration, RP and albinism• Refraction played a significant role in these cases• Would likely show different etiologies if analyzed now
given the greater understanding of CVI
195/13/2020
Pediatric Low Vision:• Multiple studies show improved visual function
with low vision aids in the pediatric population• Adaptive exams assist in determining visual
function and appropriate interventions
Low Vision TiersPrimary Care• Spectacle solutions (i.e.
high adds, single vision Rx)
• Trial frame refractions• Magnification• Education• Referrals for additional
services (i.e. O+M, OT)
Advanced Low Vision Care• Primary care plus:
– Higher power magnification (digital)
– Telescopic solutions– Technology
assessments (OCR, computer accessibility)
– Vocational Rehab– Sensory substitution
Levels of Visual Acuity• 20/20 normal
• 20/40 drive without restrictions• 20/60 read ordinary newsprint• 20/70 eligible for Medicare coverage of low vision
rehabilitation services• 20/125 eligible for blindness-related benefits
Mild low vision (20/40-20/60): 2.5 millionModerate low vision (20/70-20/200): 750,000Severe low vision (20/200 or worse): 1.25 million
Image Courtesy of Dr. Richard Jamara and Dr. Nissa C ll
Low Vision Decision Tree
Research on perceived barriers in the US and India
245/13/2020
Perceived Barriers in the US• Practitioners who do no low vision also don’t integrate
primary low vision strategies (high add, low mag, etc)• Reported barriers for providing low vision care included:
– Cost of exam/devices– Patients are not interested/would not go– Not feasible to stock devices in office
255/13/2020
Perceived Barriers in India• Reporter barriers:
– Lack of training– Lack of awareness/availability of services– Lack of access to LV devices– Lack of motivation was also noted
265/13/2020
Barriers to providing LV service
• Low vision is “slow”
• Low vision is “no show“
• Low vision requires “devices”
• Low vision requires a “store”
• Low vision requires “follow-up”
Breaking Through Barriers to Serving LV Patients
– Community outreach programs to education eye providers, patients, and the public about low vision and low vision rehabilitation
– Community eye and vision screening and education programs for seniors
– Increased training of primary eye care providers to perform low vision care in the mildly to moderately impaired population
Poor referral rates for low vision rehabilitation
Improve Care Delivery
• Measure patient reported outcomes and provide continuous professional education to improve the quality and effectiveness of low vision rehabilitation services
• Develop best practices to educate providers in the future
Improve Show Rate• Staff/Volunteers can provide or coordinate:
• Transportation• In home follow-up/support• Phone histories and confirmation calls
– Once a patient has completed a phone history, they will have a better understanding of what to expect from the visit and be more confident in the importance of coming in for the appt
Reduce Chair Time• Histories prior to the visit reduce the time the patient will
spend in the clinic• Setting up a telemedicine follow up visit will reduce the
burden on the patient returning for additional clinic visits
John Public03/22/1938
Considerations for your clinic
LV Inventory to Consider for Your Clinic
Basic LV Aid Diagnostics•Lighted Hand Held Magnifiers:
– +6D, +8D, +10D, +12D, +20D•Lighted Stand Magnifiers: +10D, +12D •Prism Half Eyes:
– +4 w/ 6Δ BI, +6 w/ 8Δ BI, +8 w/ 10Δ BI•Telescope:
– 2X Binocular System/low powered monoculars•Fit Over Filters:
• Yellow, Amber, Gray, Plum•Electronic Magnification: Portable or desktop unit
Role of Lions (Volunteers)• Community Outreach
– Ophthalmologist outreach program (patient referrals)– Public education– Vision and eye health screening – Resources for people with low vision
• Direct Service to People with Low Vision– Transportation– In home follow up
• Computer-assisted telephone interview before and after provision of clinical services
• Volunteer staffing of LOVRNET administration• Program Sustainability/National Expansion
Research and Best Practices
• Utilize outcome measures to provide real-time provider feedback on patient successes/additional goals
Massachusetts Expansion of Services• Recruited community volunteers and trained
these community members to present at retirement communities, departments of aging and other organizations
• Community members serve a key role in providing information about low vision services and they can assist with setting up appointments, transportation and other needs
Massachusetts Expansion of Services• Completed the 2nd annual 2-day low vision training for
providers this spring• Total of 50+ providers trained in both primary and
advanced low vision skills• Providers can now reach out to the existing network of
advanced care through the NECO clinical system when they run into difficult or challenging cases
435/13/2020
New initiatives• Will be setting up telemedicine consultation services to
assist new providers• A doctor at the NECO clinic will be available via video
chat while the provider has a patient• The NECO clinician will be able to provide insight into
potential device solutions, community resources and additional history questions
445/13/2020
Barriers to Providing LV Service Lions LOVRNET Solutions
Low vision is “slow” Patient histories taken ahead by staff/students/volunteers
Low vision is “no show“ Prior histories plus transportation resources and telemed will improve access
Low vision requires “devices” A limited supply of devices can be a good starting point for services
Low vision requires “follow-up” Telemedicine allows for troubleshooting and f/u in the patient’s home
Take Home Message• Access to low vision care is an increasing
challenge • There is an increased incidence and prevalence of
age-related eye disease in the aging population. • Optometrists and other eye care providers are
best suited to provide LV care, but require a different model of practice than has previously been used.
References• Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M, Giridhar P, Nutheti R, Rao GN. Planning low vision services
in India : a population-based perspective. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(10):1871-1878• https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment• Khan SA, Shamanna B, Nuthethi R. Perceived Barriers to the Provision of Low Vision Services
among Ophthalmologists in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53:69-75• Malkin AG, Ross NC, Chan TL, Protosow K, Bittner AK. U.S. Optometrists’ Reported Practices
and Perceived Barriers for Low Vision Care for Mild Visual Loss. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2020;97(1):45-51
• Gothwal VK, Herse P. Characteristics of a paediatric low vision population in a private eye hospital in India. Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 2000;20(3):212-219
Special thanks to Dr. Tiffany Chan and Dr. Bob Massof for their assistance with some of the slides and materials!
475/13/2020