Outlook for American Natural Gas_sieminski_11112014

8/10/2019 Outlook for American Natural Gas_sieminski_11112014

1/27

www.eia.govU.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis

Outlook for North American Natural Gas

For LDC Natural Gas Forum November 11, 2014 | Toronto, Ontario, Canada

By

Adam Sieminski, AdministratorU.S. Energy Information Administration


2/27

The Americas are the second largest region in natural gasreserves and resources

regional natural gas reserves and resources, 2012trillion cubic feet

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Oil and Gas Journal, U.S. Geological Survey, EIA/ARI World ShaleGas and Shale Oil Resource Assessment

LDC Natural Gas ForumNovember 11, 2014 2

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000

Middle East and North Africa

Americas

Former Soviet Union

Asia and Pacific

Sub-Saharan Africa

Europe

South Asia

Proved Reserves

Estimated Reservoired Accumulations of Undiscovered

Technically Recoverable Gas ResourcesEstimated Technically Recoverable Shale Gas Resource


3/27

The Americas hold an abundance of shale gas resources,undeveloped except in the U.S. and Canada

Americas natural gas reserves and resources, 2012trillion cubic feet

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Oil and Gas Journal, U.S. Geological Survey, EIA/ARI World ShaleGas and Shale Oil Resource Assessment.


0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

UnitedStates

Argentina Canada Brazil Mexico Venezuela Colombia Bolivia

Estimated technically recoverable shale gasresources

Estimated reservoired accumulations of undiscoveredtechnically recoverable gas resources

Proved natural gas reserves


4/27


5/27

Americas natural gas production is pulling away from other regions

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Middle East

Americas

Former Soviet Union

Asia and Oceania

Africa

Europe

dry natural gas production by regiontrillion cubic feet

Source: EIA, International Energy Statistics



6/27

Total dry natural gas production in the Americas is outpacingconsumption, largely driven by U.S. shale gas production



United States

CanadaMexicoTrinidad & Tobago

ArgentinaVenezuelaBrazilOther Americas0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

production of Americas dry natural gastrillion cubic feet

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

consumption of Americas dry natural gastrillion cubic feet


7/277

LDC Natural Gas ForumNovember 11, 2014

These seven regions accounted for 95% of U.S. oil productiongrowth and all U.S. natural gas production growth from 2011-2013

Source: EIA, Drilling Productivity Report


8/27

The U.S. has experienced a rapid increase in natural gas and oil production from shale and other tight resources

8

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Eagle Ford (TX)

Bakken (MT & ND)

Spraberry (TX & NM Permian)

Bonespr ing (TX & NM Permian)

Wolfcamp (TX & NM Permian)

Delaware (TX & NM Permian)

Yeso-Glorieta (TX & NM Permian)Niobrara-Codell (CO, WY)

Haynesville

Utica (OH, PA & WV)

Marcellus

Woodford (OK)

Granite Wash (OK & TX)

Au st in Chalk (LA & TX)

Monterey (CA)

U.S. tight oil productionmillion barrels of oil per day

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Marcellus (PA & WV)

Haynesville (LA & TX)

Eagle Ford (TX)

Fayetteville (AR)

Barnett (TX)

Woodford (OK)

Bakken (ND)

Antrim (MI, IN, & OH)

Utica (OH, PA & WV)

Rest of US 'shale'

U.S. dry shale gas productionbillion cubic feet per day

Sources: EIA derived from state administrative data collected by DrillingInfo Inc. Data are through August 2014 andrepresent EIAs official tight oil & shale gas estimates, but are not survey data. State abbreviations indicate primary state(s).



9/27

U.S. shale gas leads growth in total gas production through 2040,when production exceeds 100 billion cubic feet per day

9

U.S. dry natural gas productiontrillion cubic feet

Source: EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2014, Reference case

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Associated with oilCoalbed methane

Tight gas

Shale gas

AlaskaNon-associated offshore

Non-associated onshore

projectionshistory2012


billion cubic feet per day


10/27

10

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

2005 2012 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

U.S. dry gas consumptiontrillion cubic feet

Source: EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2014, Reference case

projectionshistory

industrial*

electricpower

commercial

residential

transportation **

11.2

4.1

1.7

11.0

3.6

9.1

4.2

0.7

8.5

2.9

*Includes combined heat-and-power and lease and plant fuel**Includes pipeline fuel

Natural gas consumption growth is driven by electric power,industrial, and transportation use



11/27

U.S. becomes a net exporter of natural gas in the near future

11

U.S. dry natural gastrillion cubic feet per year

Source: EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2014 Reference case


-10

0

10

20

30

40

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

projectionshistory 2012

Consumption

Domestic supply

Net exports

100

75

50

25

0

-25

billion cubic feet per day


12/27


13/27


Currently, most of the US exports are via pipeline, but liquefied naturalgas export projects have been proposed.Proposed non-FTA LNG export facilities as of March 2014 Potential export-oriented natural gas liquefaction facilities

Canada

Mexico

Kitimat: 0.7 Bcf/d proposed

Corpus Christi : 2.1 Bcf/d

Gulf Coast: 2.8 Bcf/d

Jordon Cove: 1.2 Bcf/d

Cove Point:1.0 Bcf/d

Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company:1.5 Bcf/d

Oregon L NG: 1.25 Bcf/d

Alaska

Kenai: 0.3 Bcf/d

LNG Facili ties Approved for exportsProposedOperatingCanadian Facilities

LNG Facilit y Capacity (Bcf /d)

2 to 31 to 20 to 1

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration based on information from the Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy and the Canadas NationalEnergy Board. Note: Capacity estimated from larger of FTA or non FTA capacity proposals.

Elba Island: 0.5 Bcf/d

Lavaca Bay, TX: 1.38 Bcf/dInglesi de, TX: 1.09Bcf/d

CE FLNG: 1.07Bcf /d

Main Pass Energy Hub :3.2 Bcf/d

Douglas Island: 0.25 Bcf/d

Prince Rupert Island: 1.0 Bcf/d

Kitimat: 2.0 Bcf/d potential

Goldboro: 0.67 Bcf/d potential

Melford: 1.8 Bcf/d potential

EOS FLNG: 1.6 Bcf/dBarca FLNG:1.6 Bcf /d

Texas Louisiana

LakeCharles2.0 Bcf /d

Sabine Pass:2.2 Bcf/d approved0.9 Bcf/d pro posed

Golden Pass:2.6 Bcf /d

Cam eron: 1.7 Bcf/dVenture Global: 0.7 Bcf/d

Freeport:2.8 Bcf/d approved

Delfin1.8 Bcf /d

Magnolia1.08 Bcf/d

13


14/27

Most liquefaction projects are in North America and will increasethe regions total capacity 8-fold by 2019


Liquefaction (bcf/d)Country Operating Construction Engineering

Peru 0.6Trinidad and Tobago 2.0Colombia 0.1United States 1.2 13.1Brazil 0.4Canada 3.3

Total 2.6 1.3 16.8Regasification (bcf/d)Country Operating Construction Engineering

Argentina 0.9Brazil 1.2 0.8Canada 1.0Chile 0.6Dominican Republic 0.2Mexico 2.3Puerto Rico 0.4United States 10.2Total 16.8 0.8 0

Source: IHS EDINNote: Displays larger import/export facilities only

Liquefaction, operatingLiquefaction, constructionLiquefaction, engineeringRegasification, operatingRegasification, construction
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/America-blank-map-01.svghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/America-blank-map-01.svghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/America-blank-map-01.svghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/America-blank-map-01.svghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/America-blank-map-01.svghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/America-blank-map-01.svghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/America-blank-map-01.svghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/America-blank-map-01.svg


15/27

Currently, the Panama Canal can accommodate only 9% of theworlds LNG carrier fleet; after the expansion, it will be able toaccommodate 88% of currently active carriers The Panama Canal and the Trans-Panama Pipeline are not

currently used for significant volumes of petroleum trade andno LNG trade

The Panama Canal expansion project will open the canal routeto Aframax tankers and 80% of the current global LNG carrierfleet, resulting in increased regional petroleum and LNG trade

By 2019, liquefaction capacity in the Americas is expected toincrease eight-fold, with most of the projects in the United

States EIA anticipates increased LNG trade between countries in the

Americas, but traffic from the Americas to Asia (the largest LNGimport market) through the Panama Canal will also increase



16/27

Shale gas in eastern Canada

16

Source: Advanced Resources International, TechnicallyRecoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An

Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 CountriesOutside the United States


Of the four shale plays in Eastern Canada, twohave been assessed by ARI

Utica in Quebec has 31.1 Tcf of technicallyrecoverable resources Horton Bluff in Nova Scotia has 3.4 Tcf of

technically recoverable resources

These shale resource volumes are not included inNEBs 2013 estimates

Quebec enacted a hydraulic fracturing moratoriumin 2012 pending further research

New Brunswick permits hydraulic fracturing, buthas imposed strict rules surrounding it

Nova Scotia, similar to Quebec, will not permithydraulic fracturing until the completion of areview, due mid-2014


17/27

LNG export projects in eastern Canada

17

Source: Company websites


Goldboro LNG Terminal H-Energy LNG Terminal

Planned year in service 2019 2020Liquefaction capacity 1.3 Bcf/d 0.6 Bcf/dStorage capacity 14.6 Bcf N/AContract 20 year supply deal with E. On AG N/ASupply sources Marcellus, eastern Canada N/ANEB approval Under review N/A

Maine


18/27

Resources in eastern Canada are modest compared with theCanada national total

Note: WCSB stands for Western Canada Sedimentary Basin . All Territories are included under Northern Canada.Source: National Energy Board, Canadas Energy Future 2013

18

Canada marketable resources in trillion cubic feetas of 12/31/12


861

116

91

17

8

WCSB*

Northern Canada

East coast

West coast

Ontario and Quebec

0 500 1000

BC AB

YKNT

SK MB

ONQC

NSNB

NL

NU


19/27

Key Takeaways from Updated EIA Study of added LNG exportsPrices: Projected average natural gas prices at the producer level average 4% to 11% abovethe Reference case projection across export scenarios over 2015-40, while residential natural

gas prices in the export scenarios average 2% to 5% above their base projectionNatural gas production: With the exception of one baseline/scenario pairing, higher naturalgas production satisfies 60% to 80% of the increase in natural gas demand from LNG exportsover 2015-40

Natural gas consumption: The electric power sector accounts for most of the decrease indelivered natural gas. The electric generation mix shifts towards other generation sources,including coal and renewables, with some decrease in total generation as electricity prices rise

CO 2 emissions: Higher coal use leads to higher carbon dioxide output

Expenditures: On average, from 2015 to 2040, natural gas bills paid by end-use consumers inthe residential, commercial and industrial sectors combined increase 1% to 8% across pairingsof export scenarios and baselines. Increases in electricity bills paid by end-use customersrange from 0% to 3%

Economic gains: Changes in the level of GDP relative to baseline range from 0.05% to 0.17%and generally increase with the amount of added LNG exports required to fulfill an exportscenario; EIAs NEMS model may understate the economic benefits



20/27

Areas of uncertainty in the outlook

Oil and natural gas prices

Chinas energy demand growth; particularly in transportation

Increasing global trade of natural gas and hydrocarbon gasliquids in addition to oil

Global development of tight oil and shale gas resources

Policy decisions on crude oil exports and pipeline permits

Impact of geopolitical tensions on energy supply Constraints on CO 2



21/27

For more information


U.S. Energy Information Administration home page | www.eia.gov

Annual Energy Outlook | www.eia.gov/aeo

Short-Term Energy Outlook | www.eia.gov/steo

International Energy Outlook | www.eia.gov/ieo

Monthly Energy Review | www.eia.gov/mer

Today in Energy | www.eia.gov/todayinenergy

State Energy Portal | www.eia.gov/state Drilling Productivity Report | www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/
http://www.eia.gov/http://www.eia.gov/aeohttp://www.eia.gov/steohttp://www.eia.gov/ieohttp://www.eia.gov/merhttp://www.eia.gov/todayinenergyhttp://www.eia.gov/statehttp://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/http://www.eia.gov/statehttp://www.eia.gov/todayinenergyhttp://www.eia.gov/merhttp://www.eia.gov/ieohttp://www.eia.gov/steohttp://www.eia.gov/aeohttp://www.eia.gov/


22/27

22

Supplemental Slides



23/27

23LDC Natural Gas ForumNovember 11, 2014

marketed gasproduction

non-marketed gas

production

A larger share of new wells produce both oil and natural gas

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 YTD

Share of new wells by production type

natural gas only

oil only

oil and natural gas

Note: 2014 figure represents averages from January to September 2014Source: EIA based on DrillingInfo


24/27

Resource and technology assumptions have major implications for projected U.S. crude oil production beyond the next few years

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1990 2000 2010 20200

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1990 2000 2010 2020

24

Source: EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2014; Short Term Energy Outlook, October 2014

Alaska

tight oil

other lower 48states onshore

lower 48 statesoffshore

STEO October 2014 U.S. crude oil projection

2012projectionshistory projectionshistory

2012

Alaska

tight oil

other lower 48states onshore

Reference casemillion barrels per day

High Oil and Gas Resource casemillion barrels per day

lower 48 statesoffshore



25/27

Most significant contributors to non-OPEC crude and leasecondensate production: Canada, Brazil, U.S., Kazakhstan, Russia

0

6

12

18

24

Canada United States Mexico Brazil Kazakhstan Russia Other

2010 2025 2040

non-OPEC crude and lease condensate production, Reference casemillion barrels per day

Source: EIA, International Energy Outlook 2014



26/27

In the Americas, recent gains in oil production are concentratedin countries with open investment structurescrude oil production by select Americas countrymillion barrels per day



0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

United States

Canada

MexicoVenezuelaBrazil

Colombia ArgentinaEcuador


27/27

Tight oil production will spread to nations outside of the UnitedStates and Canada over the projection

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

United States Canada Mexico Russia Argentina China Rest of world

2010 2025 2040

tight oil production, Reference casemillion barrels per day

Source: EIA, International Energy Outlook 2014

LDC Natural Gas ForumN b 11 2014 27

2.9 MMbbl/d in 2013

3.9 MMbbl/d in 2014 (STEO)

AEO2014 High Resource case

5.0 MMbbl/d in 2015 (STEO)

Documents

Outlook for American Natural Gas_sieminski_11112014