59

Outline: What is a miracle? What is Naturalism? David Hume’s Argument Responses to David Hume Evidence Against Naturalism Conclusion

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion
Page 2: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Outline:

What is a miracle? What is Naturalism? David Hume’s Argument Responses to David Hume Evidence Against Naturalism Conclusion

Page 3: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

“Miracle” Defined:

A miracle is a special act of God that interrupts the normal course of events.

More specifically, a miracle is an act of God to confirm the word of God through a messenger of God.

Page 4: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Naturalism:

Materialistic naturalism teaches that only physical things exist.

There is no spiritual realm or immaterial realm of existence.

Page 5: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

David Hume (1711-1776) Argued: 1) Natural law is by definition a

description of a regular occurrence. 2) A miracle is by definition a rare

occurrence. 3) The evidence for the regular is always

greater than that for the rare. 4) A wise person always bases his or her

belief on the greater evidence. 5) Therefore, a wise person should never

believe in miracles.

Page 6: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Response:

Premise 3 is not necessarily true. The evidence for the regular is not

always greater than that for the rare.

Page 7: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Counterexamples:

The origin of the universe happened only once.

The origin of the first life happened only once.

The origin of new life forms happened only once.

Historians preserve records of many events that only happened once.

Page 8: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

The Issue:

Therefore, “the issue is not whether an event is regular or rare—the issue is whether we have good evidence for the event.”—Norman Geisler and Frank Turek, I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist (2004), 207.

Page 9: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

“Natural Law”?

“This popular idea does not fit particularly well into modern scientific understandings of nature, to the extent that scientists today are less confident of the entire category of ‘natural law’ than they were, say, in the nineteenth century…

Page 10: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

“Natural Law”? Continued

…For this reason, it is probably better to think of miracles, not as supernatural violations of natural laws, but as events that contradict the normal workings of nature in such a way as to be virtually beyond belief and to require an acknowledgement that supernatural forces have been at work.”—Bart Ehrman, The New Testament. Fourth Edition (2008), 241.

Page 11: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Hume Uses Circular Reasoning

“Now of course we must agree with Hume that if there is absolutely ‘uniform experience’ against miracles, if in other words they have never happened, why then they never have….

Page 12: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Hume Uses Circular Reasoning …Unfortunately we know the

experience against them to be uniform only if we know that all the reports of them are false. And we can know all the reports to be false only if we know already that miracles have never occurred. In fact, we are arguing in a circle.”—C.S. Lewis, Miracles, 105.

Page 13: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Hume’s Assumption

How does Hume know that no miracles have ever occurred anywhere or at any time during humans’ experience?

He cannot know this for certain, so he presupposes it.

Page 14: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

If God Exists…

Miracles are possible. The largest miracle has already

occurred: creation out of nothing!

Page 15: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

C.S. Lewis Wrote:

“But if we admit God, must we admit Miracle? Indeed, indeed, you have no security against it. That is the bargain.”

It is possible that some humans may have witnessed miracles inthe past.

Page 16: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Evidence Against Naturalism:

Near-Death Experiences (NDEs) indicate that humans continue to exist consciously in some immaterial form after they die.

Page 18: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Near-Death-Experiences (NDEs):

NDEs challenge the naturalistic assumption that the mind is a mere product of the brain.

Dr. Raymond Moody coined the term "near-death experiences" in his book Life after Life.

Page 19: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Times NDEs Occur

Close to clinical death Clinically dead with no heartbeat (no

EKG readings) Clinically dead with no brain activity (no

EEG readings)

Page 20: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Ancient Near Death Experiences

Anthropologist James McClenon reports that ancient NDE accounts share common features with modern NDE accounts.

Page 21: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Anthropologist James McClenon Writes:

“Near-death experience accounts from preliterate cultures reveal the same universal features, suggesting that Paleolithic out-of-body and near-death experiences followed the ‘universal laws’ and had features in common with modern episodes…

Page 22: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

…Although culturally shaped features exist within near-death episodes, recurring elements probably contributed to convergence in concepts of heaven and hell in medieval Christian and Buddhist thought…

Page 23: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

…Medieval accounts from Europe, China, and Japan are remarkably similar and often include narrative features that do not coincide with the prevailing theologies of their time.” –James McClenon, Wondrous Healing: Shamanism, Human Evolution, and the Origin of Religion, 126-127.

Page 24: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Dialogues of Gregory the Great, (6th Century A.D.):

“…a certain soldier being also brought to the point of death, his soul was in such sort carried out of his body, that he lay void of all sense and feeling, but coming quickly again to himself, he told them that were present, what strange things he had seen. For he said (as many report that know it very well) that he saw a bridge, under which a black and smoky river did run, that had a filthy and intolerable smell:…

Page 25: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

…but upon the farther side thereof there were pleasant green meadows full of sweet flowers, in which also there were divers companies of men appareled in white: and such a delicate savor there was, that the fragrant odor thereof did give wonderful content to all them that dwelt and walked in that place…

Page 26: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

…Divers particular mansions also there were, all shining with brightness and light, and especially one magnificent and sumptuous house which was a building, the brick whereof seemed to be of gold, but whose it was that he knew not.”

Page 27: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

A Vision of Heaven and Hell (9th Century A.D.) A character named Viraz receives a

tour of heaven and hell. The first part of chapter 3 states,

“The soul of Viraz went from his body to the Peak of the Law and the Chinvat Bridge; and after seven days and nights it returned and entered his body again.”

Page 28: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

A Vision of Heaven and Hell (9th Century A.D.) Mary Boyce, Professor of Iranian

Studies in the University of London, explains that the Peak of the Law is also known as the Peak of Mount Hara, the location where departed souls are judged.

Page 29: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

A Vision of Heaven and Hell (9th Century A.D.) Viraz claims that two spiritual

entities guided him and showed him human souls in heaven and in hell.

These creatures claim they came to show Viraz “ the light and ease and comfort and happiness of heaven” and “the darkness and distress and discomfort and evil. . . in hell.”

Page 30: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

A Vision of Heaven and Hell (9th Century A.D.) Viraz continues, “The fourth step I

took up to the light of heaven, which is all bliss. And the souls of the departed came to meet us, and saluted and blessed us.”

Page 31: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Tibetan Buddhist Lingza Chokyi (16th Century A.D.) “The entire earth and ground were

filled with fire, and I felt the pain of my body burning within the blaze of a great thunderous roar. After that there appeared red, white, and yellow paths; it seemed like late evening just before midnight, and great roaring sounds occurred. A reality that wasn’t real…

Page 32: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Tibetan Buddhist Lingza Chokyi (16th Century A.D.) Then, for a brief moment, I felt as

though I arrived inside a sack of butter. Lights of five colors shined above my head, and emanating from [this] radiant halo were many rays of light. At the tips of each light ray were human bodies and many different heads…

Page 33: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Tibetan Buddhist Lingza Chokyi (16th Century A.D.) Their eyes were wide open like the

sun and the moon, and in their hands they carried many different types of weapons. Then there came the resounding roar of a thousand thunderclaps, calling out, ‘Ha! Ha! Hum! Hum! Kill! Kill! Strike! Strike!’ I was filled with inconceivable terror.”

Page 34: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Modern Near Death Experiences Many people who have NDEs

accurately relay information that they typically would not have access to while unconscious, or close to death.

Occurrences in hospital operating rooms.

Observations of people down the hall from operating rooms.

Page 35: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

“Near-Death Experiences with Meningococcal Disease” Daniel Shears, M.R.C.P.  Sarah Elison, M.Sc.  M. Elena Garralda, M.D.  Academic Unit of Child and

Adolescent Psychiatry, Imperial College London

 Simon Nadel, M.R.C.P.  Department of Pediatrics, Imperial

College London

Page 36: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

“Near-Death Experiences with Meningococcal Disease”: “We report NDEs during

meningococcal disease in three 16-year-old children, elicited during research interviews that were part of a 9- to 12-month follow-up study of psychiatric sequelae (Shears et al., 2004)….

Page 37: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

…NDEs included an out-of-body experiences (a 7-year-old girl claimed to have stood at the end of her bed while unconscious and accurately described the work carried out on her bedded self by medical staff);”

“Near-Death Experiences with Meningococcal Disease,” in Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry. Volume 44(7), July 2005, pp 630-631.

Page 38: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Cardiologist Dr. Michael Sabom Reports: “Mr. O (I-57) was a 60-year-old retired

laborer when I first interviewed him in August 1977. In July 1976, he had suffered a heart attack associated with a cardiac arrest and a combined NDE. The autoscopic portion of this combined NDE was described as follows:…”—Michael Sabom, Recollections of Death: A Medical Investigation (1982), 111.

Page 39: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Cardiologist Dr. Michael Sabom Reports: “I didn’t feel rejected or any remorse or

nothing…And I saw them stick the needle in there almost in the center of the chest but on the left side…They just plunged it in and gave me whatever that fluid was…I could see things very clear, very vivid…They put that needle in me and nothing happened so they started crawling all over me again, beating on my chest, pushing on my chest, banging with their fist on my chest…

Page 40: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Cardiologist Dr. Michael Sabom Reports: …And I remember seeing them down the

hall just as plain as could be.  The three of them were standing there-my wife, my oldest son and my oldest daughter and the doctor…There was no way, being out, that I could have seen anybody…I knew damn well they were there…I didn’t know what was going on.  I didn’t know why they were crying…And then I went further…I went to a different world…”—Michael Sabom, Recollections of Death, 111-112.

Page 41: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Pam Reynolds and “Operation Standstill” (August 1991)

Dr. Robert Spetzler, Director of Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix, Arizona operated to deal with a brain aneurysm

Flattened brainwaves Stop the breathing Stop the heart

Page 42: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Pam’s Condition During Surgery “Her eyes were lubricated to prevent

drying and then taped shut.” Standard EEG electrodes taped to her

head

—Michael Sabom, Light and Death (1998), 37, 38, 39.

Page 43: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

A “Flat” EEG:

“A ‘flat’ EEG denotes nonfunction of the cerebral cortex—the outer shell of the cerebrum. Second, auditory evoked potentials, similar to those elicited by the ear speakers in Pam’s surgery, measure brain-stem viability.”—Michael Sabom, Light and Death, 49.

Page 44: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Pam’s Brain’s Condition:

“But during ‘standstill,’ Pam’s brain was found ‘dead’ by all three clinical tests—her electroencephalogram was silent, her brain-stem response was absent, and no blood flowed through her brain. Interestingly, while in this state, she encountered the ‘deepest’ near-death experience of all Atlanta Study participants.”—Michael Sabom, Light and Death, 49.

Page 45: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Documentation

“In Pam’s case, this documentation far exceeds any recorded before and provides us with our most complete scientific glimpse yet into the near-death experience.”—Dr. Michael Sabom, Light and Death, 38.

Page 46: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

What Pam Saw:

“The saw thing that I hated the sound of looked like an electric toothbrush and it had a dent in it, a groove at the top where the saw appeared to join the handle, but it didn’t…The saw had interchangeable blades, too, but these blades were in what looked like a socket wrench case.”—Michael Sabom, Light and Death, 41.

Page 47: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

What Pam Heard:

“Someone said something about my veins and arteries being very small. I believe it was a female voice and that it was Dr. Murray, but I’m not sure.”—Michael Sabom, Light and Death, 42.

Page 48: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion
Page 49: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Why Don’t We See Biblical Miracles Today?

First, miracles reportedly occurred in small windows of time during ancient times.

There are huge gaps in time throughout the Bible’s history when God does not perform miracles.

There was no new revelation from God during those gaps in time.

Page 50: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Why Don’t We See Biblical Miracles Today?

Miracles served as confirmations for God’s revelations to humanity, according to the Bible.

The Bible, according to the Christian worldview, contains complete revelation from God, so there is no reason for God to perform grand-scale miracles like those in the Bible today.

Page 51: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Conclusion

If God exists, miracles are possible. NDEs challenge Naturalism by

showing there is evidence for some form of an afterlife.

Page 52: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Q&A

Page 53: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Hellish NDEs:

o Researcher P.M.H. Atwater reported 105 out of 700 people described their near-death experiences as being unpleasant.

o Cardiologist Maurice Rawlings recounted dozens of stories of people hearing screams and moans and witnessing violent scenes of gruesome torture at the hands of grotesque animal-human forms.

Page 54: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Dr. Maurice Rawlings

Page 55: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

The NDE that Ultimately Led Dr. Rawlings to Jesus Christ

He said, ‘Don’t you understand? I am in hell. Each time you quit I go back to hell! Don’t let me go back to hell!’…After several death episodes he finally asked me, ‘How do I stay out of hell?’ I told him I guessed it was the same principle learned in Sunday school—that I guessed Jesus Christ would be the one whom you would ask to save you.

Page 56: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Near Death Experiences and Christianity

Page 57: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

“To Be Absent from the Body…”

“Yes, we do have confidence, and we would rather be away from the body and at home with the Lord.”—2 Corinthians 5:8

Christians will be with the Lord when they are not in their groaning physical earthly bodies.

Page 58: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

Paul’s Trip to the “Third Heaven”

“I know a person in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven—whether in the body or out of the body I do not know; God knows. And I know that such a person—whether in the body or out of the body I do not know; God knows— was caught up into Paradise and heard things that are not to be told, that no mortal is permitted to repeat.” (2 Corinthians 12:2-4)

Page 59: Outline:  What is a miracle?  What is Naturalism?  David Hume’s Argument  Responses to David Hume  Evidence Against Naturalism  Conclusion

When Could Paul Have Gone to the “Third Heaven”?

“Are they ministers of Christ? I am talking like a madman—I am a better one: with far greater labours, far more imprisonments, with countless floggings, often in death. Five times I have received from the Jews the forty lashes minus one. Three times I was beaten with rods. Once I received a stoning. Three times I was shipwrecked; for a night and a day I was adrift at sea;” (2 Corinthians 11:23-25)