120
Outline Globalization Video “Winners and Losers” Social Stratification Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers” Distribution of Income & Wealth… Krugman on “Winners and Losers”

Outline Globalization Video “Winners and Losers” Social Stratification Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers” Distribution of Income

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Outline

Globalization Video “Winners and Losers”

Social Stratification Thinking Systematically

about “Winners and Losers”

Distribution of Income & Wealth… Krugman on “Winners and

Losers”

Page 2: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Now Video on Globalization and PA PASTOR FRED CRAWFORD:

“Everybody can't own the company. So some people have to get very rich for other people to make a decent living. And we just don't... we're not those folks.”

He’s a Pastor…but he sounds like a sociologist

Page 3: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Class in America

HARTFORD, Conn. — A 36-year-old Swedish countess divorcing a former CEO says she cannot live on $43 million.

Marie Douglas-David, a former investment banker, says she has no income and needs her 67-year-old husband, George David, to pay her more than $53,000 a week _ more than most U.S. households make in a year _ to cover her expenses.

David stepped down last year as chief executive at Hartford-based United Technologies Corp. but is still chairman of the board and has an estimated net worth of $329 million...

Douglas-David has filed court papers showing she has more than $53,800 in weekly expenses, including for maintaining a Park Avenue apartment and three residences in Sweden. Her weekly expenses also include $700 for limousine service, $4,500 for clothes, $1,000 for hair and skin treatments, $1,500 for restaurants and entertainment, and $8,000 for travel.

At that rate, Douglas-David would burn through $43 million in less than 16 years. The Census Bureau estimates that the median U.S. household income in 2007 was just over $50,000. (HP March 19 2009)

Page 4: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Class in America

THE tale of Lisa Bonder Kerkorian, the 36-year-old former tennis pro who is demanding $320,000 a month in child support from her former husband, the 84-year-old billionaire Kirk Kerkorian, has caused a stir among hard-working Americans. Mrs. Kerkorian, who was married to Mr. Kerkorian for one month in 1998, filed court papers on Jan. 7 seeking support for their daughter, Kira, 3. Among other things, she wants $14,000 a month for parties and play dates; $5,900 for eating out; $4,300 for eating in; $2,500 for movies and other outings; $7,000 for charitable donations; $1,400 for laundry and cleaning; $1,000 for toys, books and videos; $436 for the care of Kira's bunny rabbit and other pets; and $144,000 for travel on private jets. Sure, that sounds like a lot of Taco Bell for a 3-year-old, but Mrs. Kerkorian will need every penny. (NTY 2002)

Page 5: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Class in America

Katie and Todd Clarke of Parkersburg know the feeling. The paycheck Katie earns on $10.90 an hour as a secretary isn't enough to cover all of the family's expenses. Food takes priority; money left over goes to whichever bill collectors threaten to cut off services first.

"There's no way to pay it all," said Katie Clarke. A mental illness keeps Todd from working.

The Clarkes and Bergers are like thousands of Iowans who work hard without getting ahead. Many of these families will cover their basic monthly expenses and have little, often nothing, left over. Most are white, between 19 and 64 years old. Many have a high level of education, and they're often single women. http://www.wcfcourier.com/articles/2005/04/04/news/top_story/bd7b5d0be02b283386256fd9004ea9b2.txt

Page 6: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Why/How Does This Happen?

Social Stratification- study of systematic inequalities between groups of people that arise in a society. (D) Inequalities not simply due to differences in talent or effort

Stratification is universal, but variable Age, Race, Class, Gender…For example:

Native Americans, no income inequality, but elders had more power… South up until the1960s, inequality based on race Saudi Arabia today, inequality based on gender America today…inequality between the classes

People who study social stratification address the basic question: Who, gets what, and why? What? = Prestige, respect, income, wealth, education, land, etc. Why?= Requires analysis of social structure…norms & institutions

Page 7: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Social Stratification

Consider stratification and the Titanic…1,600 people died

Was it random? Or were certain people more likely to be saved?

Page 8: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Social Stratification and Death

Consider the Titanic…1,600 people died 60% of first class passengers were saved 36% of second class passengers were saved 24% of third class passengers were saved

Did 1st Class passengers survive at higher rates because of talent, skill or effort?

Page 9: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Social Stratification and Death

Consider the Titanic…1,600 people died 60% of first class passengers were saved 36% of second class passengers were saved 24% of third class passengers were saved

Did 1st Class passengers survive at higher rates because of talent, skill or effort?

System of stratification existed on ship “Class was a matter of life and death.” (Macionis)

1st Class warned first…cabins closer to life boats…put on boats first

It had nothing to do with talent, skills, effort & merit

Page 10: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Stratification as a Trait of Society

Think of society as a parking lot at the supermarket with 100 spots and 100 people looking for spots…

No matter what, some won’t get spots near the door; it’s just not possible No matter how talented, how hard they try, how

much personal responsibility is taken…some will not be near the door

Sociologists who study stratification examine this process

Page 11: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Stratification as a Trait of Society

Stratification is about more than personal responsibility, talent, merit and effort…it is systemic.

Imagine an Ambition pill that all Americans took every morning…the pill made provided unlimited effort and talent

Could everyone have a high status, high skill job? Doctor, Manager, Business Owner, Judge, etc.

Page 12: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Stratification as a Trait of Society

Stratification is about more than personal responsibility, talent, merit and effort…

Could everyone have a high status, high skill job? Doctor, Business Owner, Principal Judge, etc.

Stratification would still exist… society will always need someone to nurse the patients, bake the bread, teach the children, clean the offices, police the streets, etc.

Page 13: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Who gets what and why…

PASTOR FRED CRAWFORD: “Everybody can't own the company. So some people have to get very rich for other people to make a decent living. And we just don't... we're not those folks.”

In this new globalized world of ours, “Who gets what”

“The arguments are fiercest where the facts are fewest.” William James…famous dead psychologist and

philosopher

Page 14: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Income & Wealth

Income-money, wages, and payments that are periodically received from investments (D) For most people a paycheck

Income is primary source of survival for most 80% of us are production and non-supervisory

workers who depend primarily on a paycheck to make ends meet Factory workers, cops, construction workers, teachers,

cashiers, nurses, secretaries, cooks, janitors, computer technicians, social workers, engineers etc.

Page 15: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Income & Wealth

Wealth-assets, particularly those that are income producing. (D) For most people their home…

But for some people a second home in the Hamptons or Virgin Islands, an apartment in London, a Van Gogh, race horses, shopping malls, hotels, ships, sports teams, bonds, stocks, cash reserves, etc.

Page 16: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Income and Wealth

So how are income and wealth distributed among a society’s population… How do we divide the pie?

Page 17: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

This American life…

Income…

10 Volunteers Up Front…

Page 18: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Ten people…one person gets 50% of the pay on payday…

Page 19: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

The “Middle Class Squeeze”

Trends like this…along with the data on mobility have given rise to a concept

Middle class squeeze

tendency of those of the middle or intermediate classes to be pushed either upward, or more commonly, downward in terms of wages, salaries and family income (D)(p.119,384)

Let’s explore…

Page 20: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Winners and Losers

Income Inequality Today

Page 21: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Outline

Distribution of Income & Wealth… Paul Krugman, “The Great Divergence” Median income

Explaining the trends Norms and Institutions

A note on statistics… Videos should be on line next week…will

keep you posted Always posting new readings so be sure to

hit refresh when you visit the reading page

Page 22: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Quiz

1. The chapter written by Paul Krugman titled “The Great Divergence”described research showing that the economic gap between:

A. the rich and all other classes in America has increased dramatically over the past several decades

B. the middle class and rich in the US is shrinking as middle class families grow richer

C. America and Latin America has increased dramatically due to globalization

D. America and Latin America has decreased dramatically due to globalization

Page 23: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Bonus

In the reading by Paul Krugman he discussed the “Great Compression” that America experienced. This concept refers to:

A. the substantial reduction in inequality during the New Deal

B. the substantial reduction in inequality during the presidency of Ronald Reagan

C. the pressure being put on middle class families by changes in the economy

D. the increased concentration of wealth in the hands of the upper class

Page 24: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

The “Middle Class Squeeze”

Trends like this…along with the data on mobility have given rise to a concept

Middle class squeeze

tendency of those of the middle or intermediate classes to be pushed either upward, or more commonly, downward in terms of wages, salaries and family income (D)(p.119,384)

Let’s explore…

Page 25: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

US Government Occupational Outlook Projections: Top 10 Largest Job Growth

How many require a college education?

Page 26: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

An Hourglass Economy: 2010

Four of the ten do not pay enough to lift a family of four out of poverty

One just barely pays enough…

Winners and Losers: you can only work the jobs that a society provides

7

$406

$701

$862

$473

$1 ,901

$338

$257

$278

$321

$261

$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000

Week ly P ay for the T en Oc c upations T hat Will A dd the M os t J obs T hrough 2010

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Based on hourly earn ings and a 40-hour week.

U.S. Median Weekly Wages in 2000

$336 = 4-person family poverty line$336 = 4-person family poverty line1. Food preparation &

serving (includes fast food).2. Customer service

representatives.

3. Registered nurses.

4. Retail salespersons.5. Computer support

specialists.

6. Cashiers (except gaming).

7. Office clerks, general.

8. Security guards.9. Computer software

engineers, applications.

10. Waiters and waitresses.

Page 27: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Reading this Week

“Recession's toll: Most recent college grads working…”

What was this article about?

Page 28: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Sociological Imagination

“When coupled with heavy student loan obligations, it's no wonder that 40 percent of seniors surveyed by NACE said they expect to need financial help from their parents after college” (Pugh 2009: 2)

Sociological Imagination ability grasp the way the social

structure shapes individual lives(D)

1 college graduate mal-employed and moving back home…maybe something is up with them

Most college grads are mal-employed and moving back home… maybe we need to examine the social structure

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/06/25/70788/recessions-toll-most-recent-college.html

Page 29: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Sociological Imagination

Lower wage jobs have a lingering effect: “The Curse of the Class of 2009”

details how college graduates who enter the job market during the current recession will likely suffer lower wages for years to come.

For each percentage point increase in the unemployment rate, those who graduated during the recession earned 6 to 8% less in their first year of employment compared to their more fortunate counterparts. The effect decreased in magnitude by approximately a quarter of a percentage point each year after graduation.

However, even 15 years out of school, the recession graduates earned 2.5% less.

http://mba.yale.edu/news_events/CMS/Articles/6841.shtml

Page 30: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Winners and Losers

Page 31: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Video Clip

Video addresses who gets what and why in the US “Why is the middle class

shrinking?”

From Now, a weekly show on PBS hosted by Bill Moyers

Based on research in the chapter you were assigned this week…

Note…the clip takes place in the early 2000s…prior to the current economic collapse

Page 32: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Pastors and Painters and Sociologists

PASTOR FRED CRAWFORD: “Everybody can't own the company. So some people have to get very rich for other people to make a decent living. And we just don't... we're not those folks.”

Ron Caputo: “You know, their argument will be, well, nobody told you to be a painter and have so many kids. You know, you could have went to college, you could get grants, you could do this, you could do that. They're right, to an extent, okay? They are. But you know, look at the other aspect of it. Well, then who's going to do the painting?”

Page 33: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Somebody has to do the painting: 1)Who has gained the most…?

Year Hourly earnings

1947 $7.78

1967 $12.30

1973 $13.91

1979 $13.87

1989 $12.98

1995 $12.50

1999 $13.24

Page 34: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Wages Since 2000

Page 35: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Increasing Inequality in America…The “Super Rich” have gained the most…

Last 30 years have witnessed an “astonishing concentration of income and wealth in just a few hands.” (Krugman, NYT p.2)

Top 1% of families have seen after tax income rise 157%…

Most income gains since the 1970s were to the top 1%… those people making more than $230,000

And 60% of those gains went to the top .1%, those who make more than $790,000

And almost half of those gains went to the top .01%, those with income of at least $3.6 million

Page 36: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Growing Inequality

“…Top 10%, top 1% and fractions of the top 1 percent enjoyed their greatest share of income since 1928 and 1929” (Johnston 2007:1)

Page 37: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Income Distribution Over Time: The Great Compression When Income inequality declined dramatically

Why?

Page 38: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

From The Great Compression to “The growing economy is mostly going to benefit those who are not middle class.”

Page 39: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

The hope of some…the fear of others…Doubtful either way…

Page 40: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Now and Krugman

2. Relationship of top gains to other’s position?

Page 41: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

America’s Middle Class…

What does the data show about the distribution of income in America?

Page 42: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Winners and Losers Simple Math tells us… “if the rich get

more, that leaves less for everyone else.” (Krugman p. 9)

The richest 13,000 families have almost as much income as the 20 million poorest…

Page 43: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

CEO Pay

What has the trend for CEO pay in the US been?

Page 44: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Winners and Losers

Page 45: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Business Week, Fall 2004

Page 46: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

CEO Pay Compared….

It hasn’t always been like this… It’s not like this elsewhere… This is a big issue right now…

Stakeholders in conflict

Page 47: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Now and Krugman

3. Home prices vs. income…

Page 48: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

New Home Prices Up, Income Flat New Home Prices

Up 120%

Income for Middle up 10%

Page 49: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Shifting Pension Risks

What happened to the teacher’s retirement nest egg?

Page 50: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

“The Great Risk Shift”

When you’re too old to work but too young to die…

Half of America's private sector workforce are not covered by any retirement savings plan; their retirement will be anchored only by Social Security and whatever they have managed to save on their own.

The other 50 percent have one of the two main employer-sponsored retirement savings strategies: a traditional lifetime pension or a 401(k)-style investment plan. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/retirement/need/#1

What happened to the teacher’s retirement nest egg?

Page 51: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Bottom line: American Exceptionalism… “No other advanced country has seen the kind of surge in inequality that has taken place here” (Krugman p.137)

Ratio of Top 10% to Bottom 10%

Page 52: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

So what does a typical person earn…

When studying income, median is better than mean (average)

What do we mean by median income?

Page 53: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

When studying income, median is better than mean…

What do we mean by median income?

The midpoint of a distribution

Why do we look at Median Income instead of Mean….”Bill Gates walks into a bar…”

Imagine 5 people… $25,000; $30,000; $35,000; $50,000, $10,000,000

Mean vs. Median???

Page 54: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

When studying income, median is better than mean…

Why do we look at Median Income instead of Avg….Imagine 5 people… $25,000; $30,000; $35,000; $50,000, $10,000,000

Average. vs. Median???

Note the difference Average = $2,028,000…doesn’t really reflect reality Median=$35,000…better representation of reality

So what was the Median Household Income, 2009

Page 55: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Median Income

2007 2009

US $50,233 $49,777

NJ $62,594 $65,777

PA $50,107 $48,172

Page 56: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Wages Since 2000

Page 57: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

So what do people earn…

Some typical incomes?

US Bureau of Labor Statistics gathers this data annually

Page 58: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Percentage of Households by Income, 2005

Income % of Population

Under $10,000 8.3 72% of American households earn less than $75,000 a year

$10-14,999 6.4

$15-$24,999 12.4

$25-$34,999 11.4

$35-$49,999 14.9

$50-$74,999 18.4

$75-$99,000 11.1

More than $100,000 17.2

Census Bureau: Marger, p.63 In 2009, around 1 percent made more than $500,000

Page 59: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Inequality in America 2009David Cay Johnston | Oct. 25, 2010 http://www.tax.com/taxcom/taxblog.nsf/Permalink/UBEN-8AGMUZ

Page 60: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Outline

Distribution of Income & Wealth…

Krugman on “Winners and Losers”

Poverty in America Social Mobility

Esping Anderson

Stuff…movies, tests, etc.

Page 61: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Quiz

1. Research presented by Gosta Esping Anderson presented in “Equal Opportunities” and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development as discussed in the New York Times editorial, reported that mobility (movement up the class structure) in the United States is:

A. lower than in most other industrial countries. B. Higher than in most other industrial countriesC. About the same as in most other industrial

countriesD. Can no longer be measured accurately do to

changes made by the IRS

Page 62: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Quiz 2. Gosta Esping Andersen’s article titled “Equal

Opportunities and the Welfare State” suggested that:

A. that universal high quality child care can increase social mobility for low income children

B. providing families with tax credits for vocational schools can help increase social mobility for low income children

C. that welfare state really can not increase social mobility for low income children

D. that low income children in the US are more likely to make it to the middle class than low income children in Scandinavia.

Page 63: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Income & Wealth

Wealth-assets, particularly those that are income producing. For most people their home…

But for some people a second home in the Hamptons or Virgin Islands, an apartment in London, a Van Gogh, race horses, shopping malls, hotels, ships, sports teams, bonds, stocks, cash reserves, etc.

Page 64: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

This American life…

Wealth…

10 Volunteers Up Front…

Page 65: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

65

Fewer People Own More Wealth

Source: Edward N. Wolff, “Recent Trends in Wealth Ownership”

2007: richest 10% of the U.S. population owned 73% of all wealth.

1976: richest 10% of the U.S. population owned 50% of all wealth.

Page 66: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Try this with a pizza tonight…

Page 67: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

New York Magazine

Mind the Income Gap: Manhattan has the highest wealth disparity in the country. How does that make you feel? By Henry Blodget (11/06)

The richest New Yorker, David Koch, is worth an estimated $12 billion. The poorest New Yorkers, 1.5 million people with incomes below the poverty line, are collectively worth nothing—or less. David Koch, in other words, is worth $12 billion more than a fifth of the city’s residents combined.

Page 68: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Interesting to note changes over time: Great Compression

Year Pct. Of Wealth Held by Top 1%

1922 32

1929 36

1939 31

1949 21

1958 24

1969 20

1989 38

1998 38

2007 34

Page 69: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

US has highest rate of inequality in Wealth Distribution (Gini Index: closer to 100 the > inequality)

Japan 24.9

Sweden 25

Germany 30

UK 36

US 40

Page 70: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Concentration of Income and Wealth

BOTTOM LINE: Top 10% take most of the income and

wealth The rest of America splits what left

Thus the widespread discussion of the new inequality

Page 71: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Explanations for Rise in Inequality…

What does Krugman thinks explain the surge in inequality?

Hint: It’s very sociological…concepts from start of the class

Page 72: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Institutions Have Changed: In particular Unions have become much weaker

1) “Treaty of Detroit” between corporations and unions tied wages to productivity…all stakeholders benefited

Translation: 1947 Joe produced 100 widgets a day and was paid $100 1975 Joe produced 200 widgets a day and was paid $200

Page 73: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Institutional Changes: Unions are Weak and Workers Are No Longer Sharing In Economy’s Productivity Gains

Translation: 1975 Joe produced 200 widgets a day and was paid $200 2003 Joe produced 400 widgets a day and was paid $205

Page 74: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

The New Inequality: Stakeholders and Compensation

Page 75: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Institutional Change leads to Change in Norms

2) Decline of unions results in changed norms about fairness and equality

“Outrage Constraint” has lessened

In 1950 a CEO would no more take 500 times more than worker than he would fart in the middle of a meeting

Now he simply takes the money…

Page 76: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Different Institutions, Different Norms, Outcomes

General Motors, 1969

Salary in today’s dollars, $4.3 million

Workers salary, $40,000 + health care and

pension A Middle Class Wage

Walmart, 2005

Salary in 2005, $23 million 5 times what GM CEO

took

Workers salary, approximately $18,000 Most lack health care

and pensions A Poverty Wage

Page 77: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Norms Changes and Tax Changes

Page 78: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income
Page 79: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Quiz

So what about those on the bottom of our society’s system of startification

“The arguments are fiercest where the facts are fewest.” William James…famous dead psychologist

and philosopher

Page 80: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

US Poverty in Perspective, 1870-2004…Trends??? Note next slide

Page 81: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

U.S. Poverty by Age, 1959-2009: Trends?

Page 82: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

US Poverty in Perspective, 1870-2004…Government Policies and Programs have reduced poverty

Page 83: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Ok…But How Do We Figure Out Who is Poor?

Page 84: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Recession Raises Poverty Rate to a 15-Year HighBy ERIK ECKHOLM

September 16, 2010

The percentage of Americans struggling below the poverty line in 2009 was the highest it has been in 15 years, the Census Bureau reported Thursday, and interviews with poverty experts and aid groups said the increase appeared to be continuing this year.

With the country in its worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, four million additional Americans found themselves in poverty in 2009, with the total reaching 44 million, or one in seven residents. Millions more were surviving only because of expanded unemployment insurance and other assistance.

Page 85: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Determining Who is Poor? Origins of Measure: Molly Orshansky of Social Security Administration

uses “Economy Food Plan”

1955: Cost of food estimated to be 1/3 of after tax income

Took this cost and multiplied it by 3 to account for other expenses (clothes, heat, etc) Adjusted it for family size

Threshold adjusted annually for inflation using Consumer Price Index (CPI)

Today: Government adds up before tax cash income from all sources: earnings, pensions, interest, rental income, asset income, cash welfare…if below threshold…household is considered poor.

Most Sociologists consider measure crude and outdated Food budget times 3…no longer adequate formula There are actually more poor people than government statistics

suggest Catholic Church Perspective on this : tour-audio

Page 86: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Family of Two…$14,000 or $41,000

Page 87: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Poverty in America

How does the US rank when compared to other industrial nations with regard to the percentage of their population in poverty?

More poverty, about the same, less?

Page 88: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Relative Poverty, 2005

Page 89: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Child Poverty, March 2005

Page 90: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Children in Single Mother Families: Percent Poor, 2003

Page 91: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Explanations?

Page 92: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Explaining the Difference in Poverty Rates 1) US has a weaker social safety net

Less money spent on reducing poverty

Page 93: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Explaining the Difference in Poverty Rates

2)Our low status, low skill jobs pay less

“America’s bottom end workers fare worse than their counterparts in other industrialized countries. Comparable German workers earn more than twice as much” (Iceland, 2003)

Bottom 10% of US workers earn 37% of US median wage

Other industrialized countries earn 60-76% of median wage

Unions are weaker in the United States so low wage workers have less bargaining power

Page 94: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Remember the Hourglass

Occupations Adding the Most Jobs Projected increase Weekly Pay

  1) Systems Analysts 577,000 $1,008

  2) Retail Salespersons 563,000 $329

  3) Cashiers 556,000 $280

  4) General Managers 551,000 $797

  5) Truck Drivers 493,000 $299

  6) Office Clerks 463,000 $419

  7) Registered Nurses 451,000 $750

  8) Computer Support Specialists 439,000 $983

  9) Personal Care and Home Health Aides 333,000 $321

10) Teaching Assistants 375,000 $315

11) Janitors, Cleaners and Maids 365,000 $324

12) Nursing Aides and Orderlies 325,000 $322

Source: 1999 BLS data; the 1999 poverty line for a family of four is $327/week. 7

$406

$701

$862

$473

$1 ,901

$338

$257

$278

$321

$261

$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000

Week ly P ay for the T en Oc c upations T hat Will A dd the M os t J obs T hrough 2010

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Based on hourly earnings and a 40-hour week.

U.S. Median Weekly Wages in 2000

$336 = 4-person family poverty line$336 = 4-person family poverty line1. Food preparation &

serving (includes fast food).2. Customer service

representatives.

3. Registered nurses.

4. Retail salespersons.5. Computer support

specialists.

6. Cashiers (except gaming).

7. Office clerks, general.

8. Security guards.9. Computer software

engineers, applications.

10. Waiters and waitresses.

Page 95: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Poverty Quiz

The majority of poor people come from this racial or ethnic group?

A) White C) HispanicB) Black D) Asian

Page 96: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Who are the Poor?

White 56 percent African American 21 Latino 19 Asian 3 Native American 1

Source: Henslin, ch.7, 2006

Page 97: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

2007: Poverty By Race

8.2

24.5

21.5

9.8

0

5

10

15

20

25

White Black Hisp Asians

Poverty

Page 98: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Quiz

Most poor families consist of able bodied people who can work, but simply refuse to? (True or False)

Page 99: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

False…Working but poor

The Work History of Families in Poverty, 2000

Source: US Census; Poverty in the US, 2000 (2001: Table C) in Kerbo, p.259

Work History 2000

No full time worker 46.1%

1 full time worker 44.5%

2 or more full time workers 9.4%

Page 100: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Quiz…

Most poor people live in inner cities.

A. TrueB. False

Page 102: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Some Other Common Misconceptions

Typical family on “welfare” had an average of 1.8 recipient children.

One in two recipient families had only one child.

One in 10 families had more than three children.

Nearly one in two closed case families had one child,

Only six percent had more than three children.” http://www.acf.hhs.gov/pros/ofa/data-reports/annualreport8/chapter10/chap10.htm#1

People Are Poor Because they have Too Many Kids

Poverty Only Happens to Other People

Page 103: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Social Mobility

O.K…immense inequality…but if people in the bottom 90% don’t like it, they can always work harder and join the top 10%…

Work hard and you’ll get ahead…Rags to riches..

Of the poorest 20 percent of Americans in 1989, what percent were still in the poorest 20 percent in 1998?

Page 104: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income
Page 105: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income
Page 106: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Family Mobility

Page 107: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Social Class is sticky: If I know your parents class I pretty accurately predict what your class will be

Page 108: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Class Matters…

Studies of Social Mobility pose a serious challenge to the idea that is primarily talent and hard work, not inherited social advantage that separates the classes… Hard for some to accept…but mountains of research

demonstrate

What would help explain why most people don’t move very far from the class in which they where born?

Put another way… What keeps the low income people and their kids low income? What keeps middle class people and their kids middle class? What keep the rich people and their kids rich?

Page 109: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Gosta Esping Andersen & Early Childhood Development

Parents of different classes can invest in their children differently

“What is now becoming clear is that the seeds of inequality are sown prior to school age on a host of crucial attributes such as health, cognitive and noncognitive abilities, motivation to learn, and, more generally, school preparedness”(23)

Income inequality Quality of Preschools…impacted by class (Baby Ivies @ $18,000 yr) Quality of schools…Camden or Cherry Hill… Extracurricular activities…impacted by class

Cultural Resources Number of books in the house…class impacts… Parents vocabulary…note next slide…

Page 110: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Class and Early Childhood

Child in professional home exposed to 2,000 words an hour vs. child in a working class home who his exposed to 1,300 words vs. child in a welfare mother’s home who is exposed to 600

By age three Professional kids vocabulary 50% large

Class Words an Hour

Professional 2000

Working Class 1300

Welfare Mother 600

Page 111: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Investment in Kids and Higher Education

Parents of different classes can invest in their children differently

Anyone remember how the US compares to Scandinavian nations when it comes to the rate at which its poorest citizens attend college?

Page 112: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Comparing Higher Education

“This contrasts unfavorably with all the Nordic countries, where the likelihood of post-secondary education for the least privileged has risen significantly over time. For the oldest group of children, the odds of attaining higher education were not much greater than in the United States. But for the youngest Scandinavian generation, born in the 1970s, we detect a significant equalization of opportunities. In Sweden, the youngest generation of the underprivileged is now three times more likely than its American counterpart to reach the post-secondary level. Denmark and Norway have done even better: underprivileged Danes are four times and Norwegians six times as likely as their American peers to go beyond high school” (p.25)

Page 113: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

More than just aptitude, talent, effort and merit…

“The very rich can protect their less-gifted offspring from descending the social ladder. Likewise, there is far less upward mobility from the bottom than we would expect.”(p.24)

Graph says???

Page 114: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Social Stratification in America

“The very rich can protect their less-gifted offspring from descending the social ladder. Likewise, there is far less upward mobility from the bottom than we would expect.”(p.24)

Raises many questions…first of which might be do we care?

What does Esping Andersen suggest could make things more equal?

Page 115: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Comparing Higher Education

“This contrasts unfavorably with all the Nordic countries, where the likelihood of post-secondary education for the least privileged has risen significantly over time. For the oldest group of children, the odds of attaining higher education were not much greater than in the United States. But for the youngest Scandinavian generation, born in the 1970s, we detect a significant equalization of opportunities. In Sweden, the youngest generation of the underprivileged is now three times more likely than its American counterpart to reach the post-secondary level. Denmark and Norway have done even better: underprivileged Danes are four times and Norwegians six times as likely as their American peers to go beyond high school” (p.25)

Andeson attributes this to universal high quality child care that narrows the gap between rich and everyone else

Page 116: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Quiz 2. Gosta Esping Andersen’s article titled “Equal

Opportunities and the Welfare State” suggested that:

A. that universal high quality child care can increase social mobility for low income children

B. providing families with tax credits for vocational schools can help increase social mobility for low income children

C. that welfare state really can not increase social mobility for low income children

D. that low income children in the US are more likely to make it to the middle class than low income children in Scandinavia.

Page 117: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Government Redistribution of Income and Early Intervention…Fairness or Robbery?

Page 118: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Social Stratification Bottom Line

Gap between the very wealthy and everyone else has grown enormously in the past three decades

Middle class share of society’s pie is no longer expanding, and has shrunk since the 1960s

US has greater inequality, lower wages, lower life expectancy, more poverty and poorer poor people than most of our European peers

Class system in US is open, but there is not as much mobility as many believe…

Page 119: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Global Inequality

Three Richest people in the world have assets that exceed the combined Gross Domestic Product of the 48 poorest countries

The wealth of the 225 richest people is equal to the annual incomes of the poorest 47% of the worlds population (>2.5 billion)

Almost half (47%) of the people on Earth live on $2 a day or less.

Up to 2.5 billion people lack adequate food, clean water, sanitation, housing, medical care, education, transportation, and energy sources.

As much as one-third of the global workforce is unemployed or underemployed.

Page 120: Outline  Globalization Video  “Winners and Losers”  Social Stratification  Thinking Systematically about “Winners and Losers”  Distribution of Income

Next…

Inequality and Labor