Upload
chet
View
21
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Strategy Research: Governance and Competence Perspectives Oliver E. Williamson, 199 9, SMJ Presented by Wenting ( C hristy) ZHU. Outline. Research q uestion Six key moves through which the governance perspective works The same six key moves through which the competence perspective works - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Strategy Research: Governance and Competence Perspectives
Oliver E. Williamson, 1999, SMJ
Presented by Wenting (Christy) ZHU
1
Outline
• Research question
• Six key moves through which the governance perspective works
• The same six key moves through which the competence perspective works
• Challenges posed by the competence perspective for TCE (mistaken critiques and research opportunities)
• Conclusion
• Discussion
Research question
• Strategy is interdisciplinary (TCE, organization theory, contract law)
• How do perspectives of governance and competence work in the study of strategy?
Both combine economic reasoning with organization theory
Governance perspective values economics (TCE) more, whereas the competence perspective values the organization theory (process)
Six moves to operationalize TCE
• Human actors Bounded rationality, which leads to incomplete contracting Foresight (to build in dispute settling to incomplete contract) Self-interest Adverse selection, moral hazard and opportunism
• Unit of analysis Commons: the transaction TCE variables: frequency, uncertainty, and asset specificity
• Describing the firm In organizational terms as a governance structure rather than
technological term Incentive intensity, administrative controls and legal rules regime To deal with Coasean puzzle: “replication,” “selective intervention,”
and bureaucratic costs
Six moves to operationalize TCE
• Purposes served Discriminating alignment hypothesis between
transactions and governance
Six moves to operationalize TCE
• Empirical
The theory and evidence display a remarkable congruity
• Efficiency criterion
No feasible superior alternative More conceptual rather than operationalRebuttable
Six moves to operationalize competence
• Human actors Bounded rationality (implicit) e.g., learning and incomplete
contractingMyopia (fire department)Emphasize elusive notion of trust instead of opportunism
• Unit of analysisResource in the resource-based approachRoutine for evolutionary economics theory
• Describing the firmEmphasizes management and organization features and rejects
that firm is a production function
Six moves to operationalize competence
• Purposes served When to learn and develop interpersonal relations in a single, combined
firm rather than in two separate firms? Which firms are more and which are less competent in deploying their
institutional capabilities to protect their knowledge?
• Empirical Entails ex post rationalizations for success and has been remiss in
predictive respects View TCE as feeding into the competence perspective in much the same
way as organization theory is grist for the study of governance.
• Efficiency criterion Competence deals with dynamic efficiency (learning and innovation) A feasible criterion for judging dynamic efficiency is never proposed Path dependency
Mistaken critiques from “competence perspective” for TCE
• Opportunism does not have the organizational consequences that have been ascribed to it.Opportunism absent: two ideal forms of organization; incentive,
control, and contract law differences vanish; no conflict and bargaining/haggling
Initial conditions can be more consequential
• Transaction cost is a static concept and needs to be made dynamicTimely adaptation and timely convergence
• Governance does not engage the issues of managementUnderdeveloped cognitive specialization, imperfect
understanding of bureaucracy and entrepreneurship
Research opportunities from “competence perspective” for TCE
• Beyond piecemealRedefine the transaction to consider interaction effectsThe firm as a whole is larger than the sum of parts (e.g. informal
organization)
• Beyond generic governance: strategy (see table 1)
• LearningRelate learning to foresight and examine the myopic tendencies
of learning. Call for the lens of both TCE and competence to uncover the
myopic biases
Research opportunities from “competence perspective” for TCE
Conclusion
• Governance and competence are both rival and complementary (more complementary).
• Both can answer the key questions of existence, structure, and boundaries of firms.For the competence perspective, the principal factor explaining
the existence, structure, and boundaries of firms is the capacity of such an organization to protect and develop the competences of groups and individuals contained within it
For TCE, the principal factor is transaction cost.
• TCE informs the generic decision to make-or-buy while competence brings in particulars (learning, path dependences, technological opportunities, and complementary assets)
Discussion
• Geoffrey Hodgson holds that the ‘contractual approach’ is preoccupied with monitoring and metering. That is more the focus of the agency perspective (Alchian and Demsetz, 1972) rather than the governance perspective. However, transaction cost is engendered because of opportunism and metering difficulties, and contract is one of formal governance. What is the difference between contract perspective and governance perspective?
• Barnard held that adaptation was the central problem of economic organization and emphasized cooperative adaptation of a ‘conscious, deliberate, purposeful’ kind, working through administration. Also, strategic management is about coordination and resource allocation inside the firm (Rumelt et al., 1991). The firm’s capacity of adaptation and coordination, which one plays a more important role in achieving distinctive competence?
Discussion
• Given organization theory feeds into the study of governance, will adapting to uncertain environment influence the firm’s transaction cost?
• What is the definition of transaction cost?
• What are the components of transaction cost?