Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T
Empowered Families
We believe families are best-
suited to select the right schools
for their children, and we work to
remove barriers, provide families
with information, and raise
awareness of school options.
Equitable Access
We believe that all families,
regardless of race, income,
or neighborhood, deserve the
opportunity to access quality
schools that best fit their
children’s needs.
Efficiency
We believe in simplifying
the school application and
enrollment process in a way
that serves both families and
schools — One application.
One timeline. One match.
Transparency
We believe in building trust by
presenting unbiased results and
communicating honestly with all
of our stakeholders. We believe
our process must be clear,
fair, and stand up to rigorous
independent evaluation.
Community Partnerships
We believe that our community
partners, including schools,
religious organizations,
government entities, and
neighborhood groups are critical
to our success with families.
We rely on these collaborative
efforts to maximize our impact.
OUR VISION
All families in Indianapolis will have equitable access to a diverse
set of school options, and all students will attend high-quality
schools that meet their unique needs.
OUR MISSION
Enroll Indy helps families choose schools that meet their children’s needs by providing a one-stop
enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform
school improvement in Indianapolis.
OUR CORE VALUES
Dear Friends,
Five years ago, a group of Indianapolis teachers called for greater collaboration between Indianapolis Public Schools and the
local charter school community. These teachers – the front lines of our educational ecosystem – recognized something that
many people working in education do not: most families aren’t choosing a school based on whether it’s a charter or traditional
district school. They’re simply looking for a school where their child loves his teachers, feels safe, and is nurtured and valued.
And finding that school can be very challenging for many families.
For too long in Indianapolis, finding the right school for your child has been complicated and opaque. We have lauded choice
as a win for families, but we haven’t managed the process in an equitable, transparent, and efficient way. Information about
options has been hard to find. The rules governing the system have been unclear, so some families have been shut out. School
choice has not meant choice for all families. Enroll Indy is working to change that.
In November 2016, we launched the School Finder to help parents learn about their school options on one centralized platform.
The site includes transportation maps, before- and after-school programs, and information about teaching styles and curriculum.
Schools write their own profiles, and families can evaluate their public school options in one place.
Last year, the OneMatch application empowered more than 8,500 families to apply to up to ten charter and IPS Choice schools on
one application. We worked hard to make sure families knew about this new opportunity by canvassing and phone banking more than
25,000 households from November to June. We worked with more than 60 community partners to bring OneMatch to all parts of the
city. We’ve made great strides in a short time, and we hope to do even more this year.
Enroll Indy represents an unprecedented collaboration between Indianapolis Public Schools, the City of Indianapolis, and the
Indiana Charter School Board. We all believe that every student deserves to find a school where they’ll thrive – regardless of
school type. We are proud of the progress we have made, and we’re looking forward to growing and pursuing our vision for
Indianapolis’ students for years to come.
Sincerely,
Caitlin Hannon
Founder and Executive Director
ABOUT ENROLL INDY
The story of Enroll Indy starts in 2013, when a group of Teach Plus Teaching Policy Fellows recommended a centralized
enrollment system in Indianapolis to help stabilize teacher mobility across the city. Since then, we have worked with
schools and community partners to bring better resources to parents looking for schools for their children.
October 2013
Teach Plus Teaching Policy
Fellows publish Musical
Chairs: Teacher churn and its
impact on Indianapolis Public
Schools. The report calls for a
centralized enrollment platform
to help improve staffing
projections and, therefore,
stabilize the teaching force.
February/March 2016
The Steering Committee visits
New Orleans and Denver
to learn about their unified
enrollment systems and the
community engagement
efforts to ensure families
know about the new system.
June 2015
Teach Plus and IIPSC release the
Current State Assessment of Public
School Enrollment in Indianapolis,
emphasizing the challenges of the
current enrollment process for
families and schools.
October 2015
Enroll Indy launches the Steering
Committee, a group of district
and charter school leaders who
will work together to design a
potential new enrollment solution
for Indianapolis. The Steering
Committee’s work is supported
by a Parent Advisory Committee
and an Executive Committee with
representation from IPS, the City
of Indianapolis and the Indiana
Charter School Board.
Winter 2014
A group of stakeholders including
charter, district, and community
leaders forms to explore the
current enrollment system in
Indianapolis. More than 30
interviews and two parent focus
groups are conducted.
Summer 2016
Enroll Indy brings together
schools and parents to
design the School Finder.
August 2015
Enroll Indy is launched by Caitlin Hannon, an Education Entrepreneur Fellow with The Mind Trust.
Photo of
Musical
Chairs
November 2017
OneMatch opens for the 2018-19
school year. With the launch of
the application, Enroll Indy begins
a campaign to reach more than
25,000 households through door
knocking and phone banking.
February 2018
Round One OneMatch
results are released.
May 2018
Round Two OneMatch
results are released.
June 2018
Round Three OneMatch
results are released. Enroll
Indy launches the Year One
Parent Survey.
July-August 2018
Enroll Indy serves
more than 4,000 families
during Late Enrollment.
November 2018
OneMatch Year Two
launches and Enroll
Indy releases first
annual report.
March-May 2017
Enroll Indy hosts focus
groups to gather feedback
on School Finder to plan
upgrades for Year Two.
July 2017
Enroll Indy reaches goal
of 80% charter school
participation in OneMatch.
November 2016
Enroll Indy launches the School
Finder with more than 110 school
profiles and transportation maps,
giving parents the ability to build a
list of “favorite” schools.
IPS Board of School Commissioners
agrees to join the unified enrollment
system in November 2017, pending
80% participation by Indianapolis
charter schools.
Enroll Indy Family Resource Center
opens with a hotline and Enrollment
Guide team to help families learn
about and apply for school options.
PROVIDING SCHOOL INFORMATION THAT IS RELEVANT AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND
Enroll Indy believes that families are best-suited to select schools for their children, and we
work to empower them to make those choices. Prior to Enroll Indy, one of the biggest barriers
to finding the perfect school was a lack of centralized information about available schools
and their admissions policies. To address these barriers, we launched the School Finder and
OneMatch to ensure that families knew they had the opportunity to find and access the right
schools for their students. This meant spending countless hours in the community with our
partner organizations, partner schools, and knocking doors in neighborhoods.
Spring Into Education
School and Community
Fairs across Indianapolis
households canvassed
or phone banked
community partner
organizations
attendees at
community events
community events since
November 2017
million delivered
impressions in our digital
advertising campaign
pop-up enrollment
sessions with partner
organizations and schools
Enrollment Guides
on staff (English/
Spanish speaking)
4 +25K61 +29K64 6.796 5
Year One Outreach
CLOSING THE GAPBased on analysis by Enroll Indy and
Indianapolis Public Schools, Enroll Indy is
working to close the income gap between
early and late applicants. This analysis is
based on the median household income of an
applicant’s census tract, as Enroll Indy does
not collect income data from applicants.
78% of families surveyed said
it was easy to complete
the OneMatch application
Year One Successes
Visitors to our website
and School Finder since
November 2017+123K
Social media impressions
since November 2017+87K
More applicants to IPS
K-8 Choice Programs than
in 2016-17987
Media pieces with
over 8 million views14
82% of families surveyed
used the School
Finder to learn about
school options
EARLY APPLICANTS LATE APPLICANTS2016-172017-18
$53,000
$38,000
$30,000
$35,000
ONEMATCH: THE ONE-STOP APPLICATION PROCESS
Enroll Indy believes in simplifying the school application and enrollment process in a way that serves both families and schools.
Prior to Enroll Indy, there were dozens of applications and deadlines for more than 40 public schools in Indianapolis. With OneMatch,
families can apply to up to ten public schools on one simple application. During 2017-18, there were three application rounds from
November 15th through June 15th. Enroll Indy hosted late enrollment during the month of July and early August, helping families
claim seats prior to the start of the school year.
The 2018-19 school year represents the first year of the new IPS High School Choice program. In previous years, families
could apply to select choice high school programs or charter schools, or they could attend their boundary high schools.
Year One of OneMatch required that all incoming high school students use the application to rank their choices as there
are no longer neighborhood high schools.
This report provides high-level data
about Year One OneMatch results.
To view more detailed school-by-school
information, please visit
www.enrollindy.org/about/annual-reports
to view the Appendix.
ROUND 1
Nov 15–Jan 16
Results: Feb 15
ROUND 2
Jan 17–Apr 15
Results: May 10
ROUND 3
Apr 16–Jun 15
Results: Jun 26
LATE ENROLLMENT
Jul 1–Aug 10
Timeline of OneMatch in Year 1
Applications
Round 1: 3797
Round 2: 2936
Round 3: 2935
Total: 9668
Unique Applicants
Round 1: 3797
Round 2: 2431
Round 3: 2274
Total: 8502
Our role as a community
partner with Enroll Indy
is really focused on raising
awareness for families of school
aged students to best navigate
the Enroll Indy site and offerings
in the effort to make the ideal
school choice for their child. We
have hosted family meetings and
an enrollment fair as part of that
effort at both sites. EMCC is well
positioned to do so as our school
partnerships are quite expansive
and all but one is on the Enroll
Indy site.”
– Barato Britt, Executive Director of the Edna Martin Christian Center Leadership and Legacy Academy
GRASSROOTS OUTREACH FOR APPLICATIONS
From November 2017 to June 2018, Enroll Indy contacted more than 25,000 households with
school-aged children to inform them about the OneMatch application process. How do we know
that outreach worked? We found a strong correlation between the neighborhoods where we
canvassed and phone banked and neighborhoods from which we received applications.
The map below shows the top ten zip codes from which Enroll Indy received
applications. The color depth indicates the numbers of households reached
through canvassing and phone banking.
9
6
2
5
4
7
1
38
10
Those who were new to the Indianapolis choice landscape found that
using Enroll Indy made the process of finding great schools for their
students significantly easier. Monique Anderson, mother of four, is
originally from out-of-state, and her children had previously been
enrolled in local private schools.
“I have two 9th graders, a 3rd grader, and a 5th grader, and I made
the decision to enroll them in public school late in the year. I
learned about Enroll Indy at an education workshop, and in the
course of that meeting found out that the third OneMatch round
had closed the previous day. I was near tears.”
Despite the timing, Lauren Peterson (Manager of Community
Engagement and Outreach) assured Monique that it was not too
late to enroll in school.
“Lauren told me to use the School Finder, and I searched for schools
that would have transportation and were in proximity, since those
were important for us. Then I used the Open Seat Report and
talked to the staff to identify which schools still had seats available
during late enrollment. My little ones now go to Butler Lab 55
together, and my freshmen are at Arsenal Tech—one in the Law and
Public Policy program, the other in STEM. Enroll Indy was a great
help to me and my family.”
EXPLORING THE ALGORITHM: HOW ARE STUDENTS MATCHED?
Enroll Indy uses a deferred acceptance algorithm to match students to
schools. Everything that is done through the algorithm could be done with
pencil and paper for a small group of students and schools, but because
the Enroll Indy system has more than 40,000 students and 100 schools, we
use a computer so that matches are faster and more reliable. The algorithm
factors in a school’s priority policies, a student’s preferences, and the
student’s random lottery number. Students can only be matched to schools to
which they apply. By using this algorithm, Enroll Indy can promise families that
they are receiving the school they want the most that they can actually get
into, based on their priorities.
Monique Anderson works with an Enrollment Guide to enroll her students
⊲ Geographic Priority (IPS and some charters)
⊲ Sibling Priority (IPS and charters)
⊲ Displaced Student Priority (IPS only)
⊲ Child of IPS Employee (IPS only)
⊲ Child of Charter School Staff/Board Member (charter only)
⊲ Child of Butler University Staff (IPS only)
⊲ Affiliated Pre-K Program (charter only)
⊲ IPS Loyal Applicants (IPS only)
We had a great first-year
experience working with Enroll
Indy, and I couldn’t be more pleased
with the team’s responsiveness and
support throughout the process, as
well as their openness to feedback.
I’m very excited about the data that the system
is able to provide—we’re able to better anticipate
enrollment and adjust our targets.”
– Kelly Herron, Executive Director, United Schools of Indianapolis
Year One Priorities
Overall Match Rate
Top Choice Match Rate
Top 3 Match Rate
ROUND 1 94% 83% 93%
ROUND 2 81% 71% 77%
ROUND 3 75% 66% 72%
OVERALL 85% 74% 82%
Kindergarten Match Rate
7th Grade Match Rate
9th Grade Match Rate
ROUND 1 85% 96% 100%
ROUND 2 77% 86% 79%
ROUND 3 86% 81% 64%
OVERALL 82% 89% 93%
MATCH RATES
One way Enroll Indy and our school partners can measure whether
Indianapolis is meeting the demands of families is by reviewing how many
families matched to a school they wanted to attend. While Enroll Indy
wants all families to attend the school of their choice, right now, there are
not enough seats at high-demand programs. As more families learn about
their options and apply, match rates may actually go down, if supply isn’t
keeping up with demand. We will measure this on an annual basis and
share it with decision makers who are opening and closing schools.
Percentage of Students Who Successfully Matched with One of Their Choices
TRANSITION GRADE MATCH RATES
Some students at certain grade levels need a new school.
Enroll Indy calls these “transition grades” because the
student is attending school for the first time or transitioning
from one school to the next. We pay attention to match rates
at these grades, because they are the grades where we
receive the highest number of applications. Students who
had a guaranteed 7th or 9th grade seat in a feeder school
are not included in this table.
Percentage of Students Who Successfully Matched with One of Their Choices1
1Transition Grade Capacity at IPS Choice, Charter and Innovation Schools
Transition Grade Participation
Choice Across School Type
2Students who chose to attend their new boundary middle school did not have to complete a OneMatch application
Families Who Ranked At Least One…
8TH GRADE83%
6TH GRADE2
47%
Families Who Ranked a Combination of IPS Choice, Charter and/or Innovation Schools23%
There have been many wins
for IPS choice programs
since the launch of the OneMatch
application. The level of data accuracy
and transparency—both for schools
and for families—has dramatically
increased. In the past it was possible
for a student to receive seats from IPS
as well as one or more other schools.
This created uncertainty for all schools, including
IPS, as to whether or not a student would actually
show up at the start of the school year. Enroll Indy
has also led to the formalization and distribution
of enrollment policies and procedures that were
previous more difficult for families to navigate. We
also now have much more data about how families
decide which schools to attend, and what types of
programs do they prefer.
IPS has always wanted to spend more time
focusing on outreach. Enroll Indy conducted
significant outreach, and that outreach was
aligned with our desire for equity and for all
families to have access to the wide range of
schools IPS offers. As a result, we saw a 33% jump
in the number of choice applications this year,
and we saw a dramatic increase in the number of
families from low-income communities applying.”
– Patrick Herrel, Director of Enrollment and Options, Indianapolis Public Schools
31% Innovation School32% Charter
School65% IPS Choice School
LATE ENROLLMENT
Enroll Indy’s job isn’t finished after the OneMatch lottery. During the summer, families
can visit the Enroll Indy office to enroll in open seats in IPS Choice, Innovation and
Charter schools. This is called Late Enrollment. During Late Enrollment, Enroll Indy
publishes an Open Seat Report daily that shows availability across all schools.
Our goal is to encourage families to participate in the enrollment process earlier in
the year. We recognize, however, that this isn’t possible for all families and we aim
to provide a good experience during late enrollment as well. Families can also enroll
onsite at participating charter schools during late enrollment.
3This number represents total transfers. Some students may have transferred multiple times. 4These numbers exclude students enrolling in their neighborhood school.
first-time enrollments in during late enrollment
transfers during late enrollment3
total students served during late enrollment4
2,0613,5134,685
Enroll Indy has led
to unprecedented
collaboration between IPS
and the charter sector in
Indianapolis. In concert
with our partners, we will
help ensure that a strong
focus remains on high
quality options and equity
for all families.”
– Dr. Lewis D. Ferebee, Superintendent, Indianapolis Public Schools
SPOTLIGHT ON WAITLISTS
As schools moved to the Enroll Indy system, waitlists were eliminated.
There are a number of reasons waitlists don’t serve families well:
FALSE HOPE: Some waitlists move very quickly and some waitlists don’t move at all.
Families sitting on waitlists have no way of knowing whether they have a chance of
getting in and have to make alternative plans.
INSTABILITY: When a school year begins and individual schools start calling students on
their waitlists, those students may leave the school they’re attending. Then the school they’re
leaving must begin calling from their waitlist. This creates a shuffle of students across the city
during the beginning of the school year which is difficult on students and teachers.
INFLATED DEMAND: For many years, schools have used their waitlists to justify
expansion or replication. However, many families sitting on a waitlist won’t actually
move when they are called, because they’ve already started school somewhere else
and they’re happy. This means schools are using inflated demand to justify the creation
of more seats, which aren’t always needed.
So how does getting rid of waitlists fix these problems?
Enroll Indy works with schools to predict student attrition and to make offers
to families anticipating some of that attrition. In the first year of OneMatch, it
was challenging to predict attrition, because there was little historical data to
inform match targets. Every year, we will have better data to support schools
in setting their match targets. Under this system, students who would have
gotten in from the waitlist receive offers during the lottery instead of having
to wait. Attrition rates can be viewed in the Appendix of this report at
www.enrollindy.org/about/annual-reports.
For too long, we’ve expected families to navigate a really complicated
enrollment process to find the right schools for their children. Enroll Indy will change that. All families will have an equitable and transparent opportunity to find a school that meets their needs.”
– Patrick McAlister, Director, Office of Education Innovation, City of Indianapolis
DATA TO INFORM SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
For many years, Indianapolis Public Schools and local charter schools did not collaborate despite
serving many of the same families across the city. Enroll Indy, along with other developments such
as the implementation of Innovation Schools, has led to unprecedented collaboration across the
two sectors. Enroll Indy is a collaboration between the district and the two charter authorizers in
Indianapolis. Enroll Indy gathers data about demand for schools and school models in different
neighborhoods, and we’re working to help decision makers use that data to help inform changes
they make to the education landscape in Indianapolis. Over time, we hope this data will ensure that
the landscape of schools in Indianapolis is meeting the demands of families—reaching our vision
where every child attends a school that meets his or her unique needs.
What Do Families Want?
Enroll Indy sent a Year One survey to participating families. More than 1,200 families
responded in both English and Spanish. One question we asked was what factors were
important to families when selecting their schools.
Important Factors% of Families who said this was very important
The school’s test scores/letter grade 64%
The school’s special programs (STEM, Montessori, dual language, etc.) 63%
The school’s reputation/word of mouth 59%
I visited the school for a tour/open house 47%
The school is near where I live 45%
I can get transportation to the school 43%
The school’s demographics (ethnicity and socioeconomics) 37%
Recommendations from teachers at my child’s current school 35%
The school has before or after care 32%
52016-17 letter grades were used for this analysis.6This includes new or restarted schools that did not have a 2016-17 letter grade
Nearly 65% of families said that a school’s test
scores or letter grade5 was very important in
helping them make a choice, and this played
out in application data. Families want quality
options and both the district and authorizers
should focus on improving access to quality
throughout the city.
24% applicants ranked an A school first
16% applicants ranked an B school first
25% applicants ranked an C school first
15% applicants ranked an D school first
5% applicants ranked an F school first
15% applicants ranked a school without a letter grade first.6
OneMatch Kindergarten Applicants by IPS Boundary of Residence8
Number of K-8 Choices In Boundary
0 6
Where Do Applicants Live?
Enroll Indy is not only interested in
what schools families choose, but
also where applicants live. This will
help determine what neighborhoods
have access to choice and what
neighborhoods may be limited on
their choices due to distance or
transportation issues. This information
can also help the district determine
what neighborhood schools are highly
demanded and which neighborhood
schools are not.
The map displays two data points. First,
IPS Neighborhood School boundaries
are shaded based on the number of IPS
Choice and Charter Schools geographically
located within that boundary.7 The
darker the boundary, the more choices it
contains. The number overlayed on the
boundary is the number of OneMatch
Kindergarten applicants who reside in that
boundary. It is important to remember that
population sizes vary across boundaries,
so some boundaries may have a higher
number of applicants simply because they
have a higher number of students overall.
7This includes Christel House Academy South, Christel House Academy West, Emma Donnan Elementary, and Phalen Leadership Academy, none of which participate in Enroll Indy.
8This map does not include 337 Kindergarten applicants who reside outside of the IPS district.
248
67
69
11
19
48
36
4227
2542
1592
40
12
27
346
18
64
98
3930
34
34
23 68
32
28 23
34
10 8
30
Does Indianapolis Have Enough Seats?
With the implementation of OneMatch, grade level capacity and demand across
the IPS district and charter schools can be tracked in one place for the first time.
Enroll Indy works with schools to identify their target enrollment by grade level, so
we can track capacity at different grades throughout the school year. This data
will help the district and charter authorizers determine what neighborhoods need
additional capacity at specific grade levels, and which neighborhoods have an
oversaturation of seats. Based on Year One data, while there are a substantial
number of Kindergarten and 9th grade IPS Choice, Charter and Innovation seats
available, there may be a need for additional 7th grade seats in the coming years.
Transition Grade Capacity at IPS Choice, Charter and Innovation Schools9
The data in this report only scratches the surface of the kinds of information Enroll
Indy will be able to collect and analyze in coming years, we look forward to look with
our school partners and board leadership to determine how the data can be used to
inform school improvement across Indianapolis.
9This data is updated as of September 20, 2018 and does not include neighborhood schools.
Transition Grade % of Seats Occupied % of Seats Vacant
Kindergarten 79% 21%
7th Grade 93% 7%
9th Grade 70% 30%
Neighborhood Analysis
Enroll Indy has created a baseline analysis of each IPS Neighborhood Boundary to
determine which neighborhoods have the highest and lowest populations of students
“opting out” of their boundary schools. This analysis can be used to consider the
impact a new school may have on a neighborhood. Over time, Enroll Indy will be able
to track student movement and demand across all types of schools.
Enroll
Indy is
an essential
part of the
fabric of
Indianapolis’
evolving education system. Their
work ensures families have
accurate information, promotes
an equitable enrollment process,
and provides policymakers with
invaluable information on
how families are making
school choices.”
– Brandon Brown, CEO, The Mind Trust
WHAT’S NEXT?
While we’re proud of our Year One results, we’re constantly trying to improve the
enrollment process for both families and schools. As we launch Year Two, we’re using
feedback we’ve received over the last year to make changes. Some challenges are easy
to address immediately, and others will take more time and collaboration to solve.
Two Rounds and Claiming Seats
Both families and schools felt the third round of the lottery was too late to be helpful to families who needed
to make decisions about where to send their children. We heard this feedback and have eliminated the third
round. We’ve also added a “Decline” button where families can give up a seat and we’re working with schools
to streamline the registration process once a family is matched.
Enroll Indy takes on IPS Pre-K
While gathering feedback from families, there was often confusion about the two systems used for pre-K and K-12
schools. This year, IPS has asked us to take on pre-K so that families have one seamless experience.
Targeting Outreach
In Year One, we targeted families in high-need zip codes for our canvassing and phone banking efforts. This year, we
will primarily target families of students in transition grades so that they know how to find their next school. We’re
also working closely with our pre-K partners to identify students who will be going to Kindergarten for the first time.
Using Data to Improve Seat Targets
In Year One, some schools rejected students and then ended up having available seats in late enrollment.
We understand how frustrating that can be for families who aren’t able to monitor the Open Seat Report on
a daily basis. This year, we will use data to help schools maximize their matches so that more families get a
seat in a school they want.
Ongoing Collaboration on Cross-Sector Challenges
The annual enrollment cycle presents challenges across all schools, including IPS Neighborhood, Choice, Innovation
and Charters. These challenges include student transfers after Count Day, backfilling available seats throughout the
year, discipline and safety related transfers, and closing schools and programs. We are working with school partners
and families to try to come up with long-term solutions that improve equity and access for all students.
OUR BOARD
James Betley, Indiana Charter School Board
Dr. Lewis Ferebee, Indianapolis Public Schools
Joe Gramelspacher, Indianapolis Public Schools
Aleesia Johnson, Indianapolis Public Schools
Patrick McAlister, Indianapolis Mayor’s Office of Education Innovation
Tim Mulherin, Irvington Community Schools
Al White, Eli Lilly and Company
OUR TEAM
Caitlin Hannon, Founder and Executive Director
Dan Clerget, Director of Enrollment
Lauren Peterson, Manager of Community Engagement and Outreach
Jakob Fischer, Manager of Technology
Karen Hensley, Manager of Communications and Events
Meredith Sauter, Manager of Enrollment Services
ENROLLMENT GUIDES
Keyla Aviles
Shekinah Calderon-Sojo
Miriam Condor
Cristina Gonzalez
Amber Young
For additional information, including the Appendix
with school-level application data, please visit
http://enrollindy.org/about/annual-reports
New Updates for Year Two
1
2
3
4
5
SCHOOL NAME ENTRY GRADE 4 TOTAL ENTRY GRADE
ONEMATCH APPLICATIONS (ALL ROUNDS)
ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3STUDENTS
MATCHED DURING ONEMATCH
POST LOTTERY ENROLLMENT
ATTRITION RATE
ACE Preparatory Academy K 52 4 2 4 100% 100% 100% - - - 12 14 31%
Advanced Manufacturing, Engineering, & Logistics Academy At George Washington
9 262 76 4 7 100% 100% 100% - - - 82 33 15%
Allegiant Preparatory Academy
K 42 - 4 22 n/a 100% 100% - - - 26 15 39%
Andrew J Brown Academy K 97 10 34 17 100% 100% 100% - - - 63 42 26%
Avondale Meadows Academy K 136 15 32 17 100% 100% 100% - - - 64 29 26%
Avondale Meadows Middle School
6 33 1 6 7 100% 100% 100% - - - 17 10 26%
Business & Finance Academy At George Washington High School
9 254 51 3 6 100% 100% 100% - - - 63 28 10%
Career Technology Center At Arsenal Technical High School
9 607 199 21 19 100% 100% 100% - - - 238 60 10%
Center For Inquiry 2 K 296 76 43 17 34% 19% 45% In-Zone In-Zone In-Zone 52 0 12%
Center For Inquiry 27 K 210 35 14 5 56% 69% 100% In-District In-Zone - 65 8 26%
Center For Inquiry 70 K 463 78 38 14 24% 25% 11% Proximity In-District In-District 54 5 22%
Center For Inquiry 84 K 417 103 46 30 22% 18% 14% Proximity In-Zone In-Zone 52 3 16%
A PPENDIX : EN T RY GR A DE ONEM AT CH DATAIPS Choice and Charter Schools1
1ST CHOICE APPLICANTS MATCH RATES 2 LOTTERY CUTOFF 3 ENROLLMENT AND ATTRITION
7 6 5
SCHOOL NAME ENTRY GRADE 4 TOTAL ENTRY GRADE
ONEMATCH APPLICATIONS (ALL ROUNDS)
ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3STUDENTS
MATCHED DURING ONEMATCH
POST LOTTERY ENROLLMENT
ATTRITION RATE
Charles A Tindley Accelerated School
9 44 2 4 10 100% 100% 100% - - - 17 10 56%
Circle City Preparatory Charter School
K 66 4 9 12 100% 100% 100% - - - 24 36 27%
Cold Spring School K 161 16 22 13 100% 100% 64% - - In-District 57 5 29%
Construction, Engineering, & Design Academy At Arsenal Technical High School
9 425 125 5 6 100% 100% 100% - - - 140 37 16%
Edison School Of The Arts School 47
K 89 19 15 5 100% 100% 100% - - - 37 24 23%
Enlace Academy K 75 4 24 15 100% 100% 100% - - - 38 27 12%
Ernie Pyle School 90 K 76 20 16 7 100% 100% 100% - - - 43 11 26%
Francis W Parker Montessori School 56
K 134 14 10 10 100% 100% 100% - - - 37 18 31%
Frederick Douglass Super School 19
K 71 17 18 6 100% 100% 83% - - In-District 39 18 12%
George Washington Carver Montessori School 87
K 157 43 13 11 100% 100% 100% - - - 73 1 23%
Harshman Magnet Middle School Spanish Immersion
7 209 23 15 10 100% 100% 100% - - - 51 8 24%
Harshman Magnet Middle School Stem Program
7 398 116 60 19 100% 100% 100% - - - 196 4 19%
Harshman Magnet Middle School World Languages
7 234 29 8 4 100% 100% 100% - - - 44 9 9%
Health Sciences Academy At Crispus Attucks High School
9 509 165 31 31 100% 16% 11% - In-District In-District 176 11 11%
Herron High School 9 498 269 43 27 100% 100% 91% - - RLN8 349 7 33%
Herron-Riverside High School 9 284 37 49 36 100% 100% 100% - - - 128 52 23%
1ST CHOICE APPLICANTS MATCH RATES 2 LOTTERY CUTOFF 3 ENROLLMENT AND ATTRITION
7 6 5
SCHOOL NAME ENTRY GRADE 4 TOTAL ENTRY GRADE
ONEMATCH APPLICATIONS (ALL ROUNDS)
ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3STUDENTS
MATCHED DURING ONEMATCH
POST LOTTERY ENROLLMENT
ATTRITION RATE
Indiana Math & Science Academy - North
K 79 2 24 11 100% 100% 100% - - - 32 25 30%
Indiana Math & Science Academy- West
K 96 6 24 18 100% 100% 100% - - - 45 31 26%
Indianapolis Academy Of Excellence
K 58 1 3 2 100% 100% 100% - - - 5 17 14%
Indianapolis Lighthouse Charter School
K 80 0 20 12 n/a 100% 100% - - - 30 30 17%
Indianapolis Lighthouse East 7 53 4 6 12 100% 100% 100% - - - 24 36 42%
Indianapolis Metropolitan High School
9 32 0 5 5 n/a 100% 100% - - - 14 38 48%
Information Technology Academy At George Washington High School
9 187 33 3 5 100% 100% 100% - - - 44 21 18%
International Baccalaureate Programme At Shortridge High School
9 420 137 23 16 76% 0% 0% In-District - - 106 6 30%
IPS/Butler University Laboratory School 55
K 307 36 20 10 32% 36% 50% In-Zone In-District In-District 63 4 36%
IPS/Butler University Laboratory School 60
K 394 81 35 15 25% 18% 27% Proximity Proximity In-Zone 53 1 9%
Irvington Community Elementary School
K 119 38 27 11 100% 100% 100% - - - 73 18 19%
Irvington Community Middle School
6 22 2 6 6 100% 100% 100% - - - 14 8 36%
Irvington Preparatory Academy
9 74 9 8 6 100% 100% 100% - - - 23 16 33%
KIPP Indy College Prep Middle 6 53 7 6 17 100% 100% 100% - - - 37 36 26%
KIPP Indy Unite Elementary K 123 28 24 30 100% 100% 100% - - - 79 21 13%
1ST CHOICE APPLICANTS MATCH RATES 2 LOTTERY CUTOFF 3 ENROLLMENT AND ATTRITION
7 6 5
SCHOOL NAME ENTRY GRADE 4 TOTAL ENTRY GRADE
ONEMATCH APPLICATIONS (ALL ROUNDS)
ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3STUDENTS
MATCHED DURING ONEMATCH
POST LOTTERY ENROLLMENT
ATTRITION RATE
Law & Public Policy Program At Arsenal Technical High School
9 313 91 4 1 100% 100% 100% - - - 103 18 17%
Longfellow STEM/Medical Magnet Middle School
7 451 121 99 44 100% 100% 100% - - - 277 1 10%
Math & Science Program At Arsenal Technical High School
9 363 72 5 1 100% 100% 100% - - - 83 16 9%
New Tech Program At Arsenal Technical High School
9 392 101 3 8 100% 100% 100% - - - 115 22 13%
Paramount Brookside K 199 32 47 22 100% 100% 79% - - RLN 94 30 32%
Paramount Community Heights
K 52 - 1 28 n/a 100% 82% - - RLN 25 5 23%
PilotED Schools: Bethel Park K 40 0 4 30 100% 100% 100% - - - 35 33 49%
Purdue Polytechnic High School - Indianapolis
9 266 111 34 15 100% 100% 100% - - - 161 14 41%
Rousseau McClellan Montessori School 91
K 295 48 28 13 70% 68% 100% In-Zone RLN - 111 0 30%
Sidener Academy For High Ability Students
2 72 32 12 6 100% 100% 75% - - In-District 35 7 12%
Southeast Neighborhood School Of Excellence (SENSE)
K 60 3 21 11 100% 100% 100% - - - 29 29 19%
Teaching, Learning, & Leading Academy At Crispus Attucks High School
9 317 38 9 11 100% 36% 20% - In-District In-District 52 4 11%
Theodore Potter School 74 K 112 32 17 8 100% 100% 100% - - - 61 6 15%
Thrival Academy Indy 11 30 - 2 24 n/a 100% 100% - - - 24 5 31%
Tindley Collegiate Academy 6 33 0 5 8 n/a 100% 100% - - - 14 23 41%
1ST CHOICE APPLICANTS MATCH RATES 2 LOTTERY CUTOFF 3 ENROLLMENT AND ATTRITION
7 6 5
SCHOOL NAME ENTRY GRADE 4 TOTAL ENTRY GRADE
ONEMATCH APPLICATIONS (ALL ROUNDS)
ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3STUDENTS
MATCHED DURING ONEMATCH
POST LOTTERY ENROLLMENT
ATTRITION RATE
Tindley Genesis Academy K 88 5 17 11 100% 100% 100% - - - 33 25 36%
Tindley Renaissance Academy
K 105 4 15 25 100% 100% 100% - - - 43 44 29%
Tindley Summit Academy K 77 3 7 11 100% 100% 100% - - - 24 33 32%
Vanguard Collegiate 5 8 - 1 7 n/a 100% 100% - - - 8 21 17%
Vision Academy K 91 5 14 7 100% 100% 100% - - - 28 24 27%
Visual & Performing Arts And Humanities Program At Shortridge High School
9 552 166 25 14 76% 12% 42% In-District In-District In-District 141 12 24%
1ST CHOICE APPLICANTS MATCH RATES 2 LOTTERY CUTOFF 3 ENROLLMENT AND ATTRITION
7 6 5
1 This chart excludes all neighborhood boundary schools, including Innovation neighborhood schools.
2 The Match Rate is calculated by taking the number of students accepted in a round divided by the number of students who were considered in that round. Students who were accepted to a higher choice school, rejected due to Family Match, and/or rejected due to ineligibility (i.e., birthdate, Sidener testing, or 3rd round transfers for IPS Choice High School programs, etc.) were not considered and are therefore excluded from match rates.
3 The Lottery Cutoff is the priority group of the last student admitted. For example, if the Lottery Cutoff is “In-Zone,” that means all In-District Siblings were admitted, all In-Proximity students were admitted, and some In-Zone students were admitted.
4 Data is only for the “entry grade” of each school. For example, for a K-8 school, only Kindergarten data is included.
5 As a reminder, students can rank up to 10 schools and are matched to the school they want the most that still has space based on their priorities. Therefore, “Students Matched During OneMatch” is inclusive of any student who was matched to the school during a OneMatch round—not just students who ranked the school first.
6 Post-Lottery Enrollment is enrollment that happened from July 2nd through September 25th.
7 The attrition rate of a school is figured by dividing the number of students who were enrolled but did not attend by the total students who were enrolled in that school at any point, beginning with OneMatch Round 1 and ending September 25th.
8 Random Lottery Number
(317) 426-3234
120 E Walnut Street, Indianapolis, IN 46204
W W W . E N R O L L I N D Y . O R G