16
Our current hyperthermal? Future climate, the Paris Agreement and impacts on society Dann Mitchell + the HAPPI team 12 October 2017 1 Dann Mitchell [email protected] ClimateDann

Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Our current hyperthermal?

Future climate, the Paris Agreement and impacts on society Dann Mitchell + the HAPPI team

12 October 2017

1 Dann Mitchell

[email protected] ClimateDann

Page 2: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

The Paris Agreement on Climate Change

2

12 October 2017

“… to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change”

Page 3: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Where are we now?

• It is hard to define GMT.

• Haustein estimates we are ~1C above PI.

• Other studies suggestion 0.9-1.2

3

12 October 2017

(Haustein et al, 2017: in revision)

Page 4: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Where are we now?

• Figure shows current observed warming since preindustrial in HadCRUT4.

• Observations show regions that are warmer than 1.5C already.

4

12 October 2017

Page 5: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

How much longer have we got left?

5

12 October 2017

(Millar et al, 2017)

• Emissions need to peak and decline below current levels before 2030.

• We then need to follow an extremely ambitious mitigation scenario.

• So 1.5C is NOT a geophysical impossibility.

Page 6: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

How do we predict impacts in a future climate?

6

12 October 2017

(adapted from James et al, 2017)

a) Sanderson et al, 2017 b) Mitchell et al, 2017 c) Huntingford et al, 2017 d) King et al, 2017

Examples of who have used these methods:

Page 7: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Does the method make a difference?

7

12 October 2017

Sanderson et al, 2017

Mitchell et al, 2017

Huntingford et al, 2017

King et al, 2017

Page 8: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Half a degree Additional warming; Prognosis and Projected Impacts (HAPPI).

8

12 October 2017

“… to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change”

(Mitchell et al, 2017)

Page 9: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Are global temperature limits a sensible framing of the problem?

9

12 October 2017

(Baker et al, 2017: in review)

If we change the atmospheric composition, but keep the global meant temperature the same, what happens? • 1 scenario with high CO2, 1 scenario with low CO2, both have GMT of 1.5C. • A clear increase in hot days is observed under higher CO2 scenario.

Page 10: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Future changes in extremes

10

12 October 2017

(Shiogama et al, 2017: in review)

Page 11: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Future impacts – human health

11

12 October 2017

(Mitchell et al, 2017: in review)

How would the 2003 European heatwave look like if it occurred in the future? •Combining climate models with health models. •Stabilization of climate at 1.5C over 2C would decrease mortality by ~15-22%.

Page 12: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Future impacts – crops (wheat)

12

12 October 2017

(Guapp et al, 2017: in review)

• The likelihood that none or just 1 breadbasket experiences risk decreases to ~zero.

• The return time of 5 breadbaskets failing together goes from 43 years to 15 years.

Page 13: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Future impacts - flooding

13

12 October 2017

(Uhe et al, 2017: in prep)

• Detectable changes in most of the 10 largest river basins.

Page 14: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Future impacts – North Atlantic storms

14

12 October 2017

(Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol))

• No real change in storm numbers observed.

• No change in storm strength.

• Small shift in storm tracks

• Similar arguments for Atlantic Hurricanes

Page 15: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

The Paris Agreement: Understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels

15

12 October 2017

Page 16: Our current hyperthermal? · (Dan James dissertation (University of Bristol)) • No real change in storm numbers observed. • No change in storm strength. • Small shift in storm

Conclusions • The Paris Agreement on climate change aims for

a 1.5C limit on GMT. • Results of climate impacts are very method

dependent. • Results from HAPPI show detectable changes in

human mortality, crop failure and river flooding, but not storminess. (www.happimip.org)

16

12 October 2017