Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
COMPARISON OF AIR TEMPERATURE TRENDS BASED ON REANALYSIS DATA, MODEL SIMULATIONS DATA AND AEROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS V.M. Khan, K.G. Rubinshtain, Hydrometeorological Center of Russia (e-mail: [email protected]) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
COMPARISON OF AIR TEMPERATURE TRENDS BASED ON REANALYSIS DATA, MODEL SIMULATIONS DATA AND AEROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS V.M. Khan, K.G. Rubinshtain, Hydrometeorological Center of Russia (e-mail: [email protected])А.М. Sterin, Russian Institute of Hydrometeorological Information – World Data Center (e-mail: [email protected])
Intercomparison of the decadal linear trend [°C (10 yr)1] in zonalaverage temperature anomaly during ERA-15 period Jan 1979–Feb 1994 (From: Kistler et al., BAMS, 2001, no.2)
Other sources:
L. Bengtsson, S.Hagemann, and K.Hodges, 2004: Can climate trends be calculated from re-analysis data ? Max- Planck Inst. For Meteorology, Report No. 351, January 2004
Objectives ● Estimate applicability of reanalysis data (NCAR/NCEP and ECMWF) to investigating long-term upper air temperature trends
● Estimate how consistent are trends of U/A temperature based on climate model simulations (RHMC and INM) and U/A dataData used:
1. Monthly temperature of NCAR/NCEP reanalysis (1951-2000) 17- Levels 1000, 925, 850, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 70, 50, 30, 20, 10] hPa. 2.5 x 2.5 .
2. Monthly temperature of ECMWF reanalysis 17- Levels 1000, 925, 850, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 70, 50, 30, 20, 10] hPa. 2.5 x 2.5 .
3. Agrological data (CARDS) MONADS – monthly mean temperature on standard levels 15 – levels [SURF, 1000, 850, 700, 500, 400, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 70, 50, 30, 20] hPa
4. Institute of Numerical Mathematics (INM) and Hydrometeorological Center of Russia (RHMC )- temperature of results of AMIP experiments (1979-1996 ) 15 levels 1000, 850, 700, 500, 400, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 70, 50, 30, 20,10] hPa 2,5 x 2,5
Мethodology
The analysis of linear correlations between reanalysis NCEP/NCAR and ECMWF for different isobaric levels was performed
The air temperature trends and their statistical characteristics for the monthly values from the CARDS data set and the corresponding interpolated values from reanalysis (NCAR/NCEP and ECMWF) and model (INM - model of Institute of Numerical Mathematics, RHMC - model of Hydrometeorological Center of Russia) data at the grid points closest to the station were calculated.
Vertical profiles of air temperature trends are analyzed for both entire year and for different seasons using reanalysis and aerological data.
A special criterion is applied to evaluate the degree of coincidence by sign between the air temperature trends derived from the two types of data.
Z=(nc-nd)/N, Vertical sections of the linear trend averaged over the 2.5-
degrees zones for the both hemispheres are analyzed. Estimates of monthly-mean troposphere and stratospheric
temperature trends over the past twenty years, from different hydrodynamical models are compared both with each other and with the observed trend analyses using aerological observations.
1
2
3
45
6 7
8
-1 5 0 -1 0 0 -5 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0
-5 0
0
5 091 0
LOCATION OF SELECTED U/A STATIONS FOR TREND PROFILE ANALYSIS
(NCAR/NCEP vs U/A DATA)
Period 1979-19981, Lat=14.68, Long=342.57
Aerol. data Reanal. data-3,0 -2,5 -2,0 -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0
Coef. of trend
925
700
500
300
200
100
50
20
Lev
el,
hP
a
Period 1964-1998,1, Lat=14.68, Long=342.57
Aerol. data Reanal. data-1,8 -1,4 -1,0 -0,6 -0,2 0,2 0,6 1,0
Coef. of trend
925
700
500
300
200
100
50
20
Leve
l, hP
a
Dakar, Senegal
VERTICAL PROFILES OF LINEAR TRENDS
Period 1979-1998,2, Lat=-1.3 , Long=36.75
Aerol. data Reanal. data-2,0 -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0
Coef. of trend
925
700
500
300
200
100
50
20
Leve
l, hP
a
Period 1964-1998,2, Lat=-1.3, Long=36.75
Aerol. data Reanal. data-1,0 -0,6 -0,2 0,2 0,6 1,0
Coef. of trend
925
700
500
300
200
100
50
20
Leve
l, hP
a
Nairobi, KenyaVERTICAL PROFILES OF LINEAR
TRENDS
Period 1979-1998,4, Lat=-17.55, Long=210.39
Aerol. data Reanal. data-2,5 -2,0 -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0
Coef. of trend
925
700
500
300
200
100
50
20
Leve
l, hP
a
Period 1964-19984, Lat=-17.55, Long=210.39
Aerol. data Reanal. data-2,5 -2,0 -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5
Coef. of trend
925
700
500
300
200
100
50
20
Leve
l, hP
a
Tahiti, France
VERTICAL PROFILES OF LINEAR TRENDS
Long=220.3, Lat=59.5, 1964-1998
Rean. Aerol.-0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8
Coef. of trend
1000
850
700
500
400
300
250
200
150
100
70
50
30
20
Leve
l, hP
a
long=220.3, Lat=59.5, 1979-1998
Rean. Aerol.-1,4 -1,2 -1,0 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0
Coef. of trend
1000
850
700
500
400
300
250
200
150
100
70
50
30
20
Leve
l, hP
a
Yakutat, USA
VERTICAL PROFILES OF LINEAR TRENDS
Long=5.6, Lat=58.9, 1964-1998
Rean. Aerol.-1,2 -1,0 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6
Coef. of trend
1000
850
700
500
400
300
250
200
150
100
70
50
30
20
Leve
l, hP
a
Long=5.6, Lat=58.9, 1979-1998
Rean. Aerol.-1,4 -1,2 -1,0 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0
Coef. of trend
1000
850
700
500
400
300
250
200
150
100
70
50
30
20
Leve
l, hP
a
Stavanger, Norway
VERTICAL PROFILES OF LINEAR TRENDS
The degree of coincidence by sign (criterion Z) between the air temperature trends derived from the two types of data (NCAR/NCEP and aerological data) for different regions of the world
-1 5 0 -1 0 0 -5 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0
L o n g itu d e
P e rio d o f o b se rv a tio n 1 9 6 4 -1 9 9 8
-7 0
-4 0
-1 0
2 0
5 0
Lat
itude
-0 .9 0 to -0 .4 1
-0 .4 0 to -0 .1 1
-0 .1 0 to 0 .5 0
0 .5 1 to 0 .8 0
0 .8 1 to 1 .0 0
-1 5 0 -1 0 0 -5 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0
L o n g itu d e
P e rio d o f o b se rv a tio n 1 9 7 9 -1 9 9 8
-7 0
-4 0
-1 0
2 0
5 0
Lat
itude
-0 .5 7 to -0 .4 1
-0 .4 0 to -0 .1 1
-0 .1 0 to 0 .5 0
0 .5 1 to 0 .8 0
0 .8 1 to 1 .0 0
Trends sections from U/A data (right) and NCAR/NCEP (left), 1979-1998
Trends sections from U/A data (right) and NCAR/NCEP (left), 1979-1998
T ren d s fro m N C A R /N C E P rean a ly s is d a ta , p e rio d 1 9 7 9 -1 9 9 8
1 0 0 0
8 5 0
7 0 0
5 0 0
4 0 0
3 0 0
2 5 0
2 0 0
1 5 0
1 0 0
7 0
5 0
3 0
2 0
Lev
els,
hP
a
-6 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0
L a titu d e
1 0 0 0
8 5 0
7 0 0
5 0 0
4 0 0
3 0 0
2 5 0
2 0 0
1 5 0
1 0 0
7 0
5 0
3 0
2 0
T ren d s fro m ae ro lo g ica l d a ta , p e rio d 1 9 7 9 -1 9 9 8
Lev
els,
hP
a
-6 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0
L a titu d e
Trends sections from ECMWF (left) and NCAR/NCEP (right), 1958-2000
9 2 5
8 5 0
7 0 0
5 0 0
4 0 0
3 0 0
2 5 0
2 0 0
1 5 0
1 0 0
7 0
3 0
2 0
6 0 0
1 0 0 0
5 0
1 0
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
Latitude
Trends from EC M W F reanalysis data, period 1958-2000
Leve
ls, h
Pa
9 2 5
8 5 0
7 0 0
5 0 0
4 0 0
3 0 0
2 5 0
2 0 0
1 5 0
1 0 0
7 0
3 0
2 0
6 0 0
1 0 0 0
5 0
1 0
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
Latitude
Trends from N C AR /N C EP reanalysis data , period 1958-2000
Leve
ls, h
Pa
Range of criterium Z
% Quantity of st.
% Quantity of st.
NCAR/NCEP data and INM model data Aerol.data and INM model data -1 - 0 46 % 207 38.3% 159 0 - 0.5 23.3% 103 29.3% 122 0.5 - 1 30.7% 137 34.6% 135 NCAR/NCEP data and RHMC model data Aerol.data and RHMC model data -1 - 0 64.8% 287 55.1% 194 0 - 0.5 20.5% 91 26.4% 93 0.5 - 1 15.7% 65 18.5% 65 NCAR/NCEP data and aerol. data Aerol.data and ECMWF data -1 - 0 6.4% 28 5.1% 22 0 - 0.5 20.9% 91 15.6% 68 0.5 - 1 72.7% 317 79.3% 345
Main results:
• Linear correlation analysis between NCAR/NCEP and ECMWF reanalysis temperature of free atmosphere for period 1958-2000 demonstrates good coincidence of data.• The results of trend comparisons demonstrate what ECMWF reanalysis of air temperature data represent trend values in the observational data better than NCAR/NCEP reanalysis data. • Significant differences of the air temperature trend values are observed near the land surface and in the tropopause layer.
• A comparative analysis of the trends for the both periods of observation: 1964 through 1998, and 1979 through 1998, - shows that introducing satellite information in the reanalysis data resulted in an increase of the number of stations where the signs of the trend derived from the two sets of data coincide.• Analysis of vertical profiles of air temperature trends using the NCAR/NCEP and aerologcal data for different seasons shows that in general, the seasonal variability of vertical distributions of the trend is slim, except in the southeastern part of Asia where winter values of the low troposphere trend differ significantly from those in the other seasons.
Main results:
•The period for trend comparisons (1979-1996) with the models is not very good! But: •Results of the comparison of time temperature trends of two GCM models: RHMC and INM demonstrate reasonable coincidence between RHMC data and aerological observations for the northwestern part of North America, Central America, and northwestern part of Eurasia. •The air temperature trends were good simulated by RHMC model in the tropical belt of the world. •The INM model demonstrates good coincidence in air temperature trends in the belts from ~55°N to ~80°N and from ~10°N to ~25°S.
THANK YOU!
Широтное осреднение трендов для разных уровней
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
9 0 0
1 0 0 0
Lev
el, h
PaR ean a ly s is d a ta , p e rio d 1 9 6 4 -1 9 9 8
-6 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0
L a ttitu d e
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
9 0 0
1 0 0 0
Lev
el, h
Pa
A ero lo g ica l d a ta , p e rio d 1 9 6 4 -1 9 9 8
-6 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0
L a titu d e
-1 .0 -0 .8 -0 .6 -0 .4 -0 .2 0 .0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 1 .0
Широтное осреднение трендов для разных уровней
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
9 0 0
1 0 0 0
Leve
ls, h
Pa
A ero lo g ica l d a ta , p e rio d 1 9 7 9 -1 9 9 8
-6 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0
L a titu d e
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
9 0 0
1 0 0 0
Leve
l, hP
a
R ean a ly s is d a ta , p e rio d 1 9 7 9 -1 9 9 8
-6 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0
L atitu d e
-1 .3 -1 .1 -0 .9 -0 .7 -0 .5 -0 .3 -0 .1 0 .1 0 .3 0 .5 0 .7 0 .9
Невязки трендов
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
9 0 0
1 0 0 0
Lev
el, h
Pa-6 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0
M isfit o f tren d s , 1 9 6 4 -1 9 9 8
-6 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0
L a titu d e
-1 .5 -1 .1 -0 .7 -0 .3 0 .1 0 .5 0 .9 1 .3
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
9 0 0
1 0 0 0
Leve
l, hP
a
-6 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0
M isfit o f tren d s , 1 9 7 9 -1 9 9 8
-6 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0
L a titu d e
Сравнительный анализ месячных данных ре-анализаNCAR/NCEP и аэрологических наблюдений по южному полушарию.
100mb
500mb
850mb
Temperature, January, mean
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
2.4
2.8
3.2
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
South America Africa Australia
100mb
500mb
850mb
Temperature, July, mean
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
South America Africa Australia
Methodology The analysis of linear correlations between reanalysis NCEP/NCAR and ECMWF for isobaric levels was performed The air temperature trends and their statistical characteristics for the monthly values from the CARDS data set and the corresponding interpolated values from reanalysis and models data at the grid points closest to the station were calculated. Vertical profiles of air temperature trends are analyzed for both entire year and for different seasons. A special criterion is applied to evaluate the degree of coincidence by sign between air temperature trends derived from the two types of data. Z=(nc-nd)/N, Vertical sections of the linear trend averaged over the 2.5-degrees zones for the both hemispheres are analyzed. Estimates of monthly - mean free atmosphere temperature trends over the twenty years, from hydrodynamical models experiments are compared both with each other and with the observed trend analyses using aerological observations.
nn
nn
N
XX i
2' )(
