5
8/10/2019 OSS_853032 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oss853032 1/5  BBPCOBL1_470 out of sync with structure BBP_COBL_47A in ECC ( 853032 / 2011 ) Print Action Log Incident Administration  Classification Message 853032 / 2011  created 13.10.2011 - 02:09:28 CET Reporter Diana Jan Customer Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (132729) Last change 16.03.2012 - 23:17:34 CET by unknown Status Confirmed Automatically La nguage Eng lish Component SRM-EBP-CA-ACC Priority Medium Business operations are affected.   Aff ect ed Sy st em System ID / Name EBX / SRM 4.0 Prototype System Installation No. / Name 0020090605 / Enterprise Buyer Installation System Type Development system Product Version SAP SRM 4.0 Operating System AIX_64 6.1 Database DB2/CS 09.07.0004 Technical Usage Type No technical usage types available Changed on 22.02.2013 by SAP EarlyWatch Alert Service Connection Status  Access Data Missing / Connection Closed Show All System Data  Maintain Access Data  Maintain Service Connection Problem Details: BBPCOBL1_470 out of sync with structure BBP_COBL_47A in ECC  Short Text BBPCOBL1_470 out of sync with structure BBP_COBL_47A in ECC Long Text We just upgraded our system EBX from SRM 4.0 with SRM server 500 to SRM 7.01 (SRM 7.0 EHP1 SP5). During upgrade from SRM 4.0 to SRM 7.01, structure BBPCOBL1_470 was reset to original. In a previous version of SRM, we implemented custom account assignment fields in include CI_BBP_ACC. We are deployed in a Classic scenario with an ECC 6.0 Ehp5 back-end. While creating/approving shopping carts in our upgraded SRM 7.01 environment, we encounter errors and inconsistencies whenever we adjust any account assignment details. This is a result of structure BBPCOBL1_470 being out of sync with structure BBP_COBL_47A in ECC. We have encountered similar issues in the past and implemented the changes to structure BBPCOBL1_470 as indicated by OSS note 1081297 and related notes. However, this note is not listed as relevant for SRM 7.01. How should we proceed to get the coding block structure in SRM 7.01 in synch with ECC. The OSS note 1081297 is vallid for SRM server 500 and 550, not valid for SRM 7.01. If we implement OSS note 1081297, would it cause issue for other areas in SRM 7.01 upgraded system? Thanks, Diana  Steps for Reconstruction  Error Message Number Screen Number Transaction Program Table Incident Wizard https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp 10/27/2014 1

OSS_853032

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: OSS_853032

8/10/2019 OSS_853032

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oss853032 1/5

 BBPCOBL1_470 out of sync with structure BBP_COBL_47A in ECC ( 853032 / 2011 )

Print Action Log

Incident Administration 

Classification

Message 853032 / 2011

  created 13.10.2011 - 02:09:28 CET

Reporter Diana Jan

Customer Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (132729)

Last change 16.03.2012 - 23:17:34 CET by unknown

Status Confirmed Automatically

Language English

Component SRM-EBP-CA-ACC

Priority Medium

Business operations are affected.

 

 Aff ected System

System ID / Name EBX / SRM 4.0 Prototype SystemInstallation No. / Name 0020090605 / Enterprise Buyer Installation

System Type Development system

Product Version SAP SRM 4.0

Operating System AIX_64 6.1

Database DB2/CS 09.07.0004

Technical Usage Type No technical usage types available

Changed on 22.02.2013 by SAP EarlyWatch Alert Service

Connection Status   Access Data Missing / Connection Closed

Show All System Data   Maintain Access Data   Maintain Service Connection

Problem Details: BBPCOBL1_470 out o f sync with str uctur e BBP_COBL_47A in ECC Short Text

BBPCOBL1_470 out of sync with structure BBP_COBL_47A in ECC

Long Text

We just upgraded our system EBX from SRM 4.0 with SRM server 500

to

SRM 7.01 (SRM 7.0 EHP1 SP5).

During upgrade from SRM 4.0 to SRM 7.01, structure BBPCOBL1_470

was

reset to original. In a previous version of SRM, we implemented custom

account assignment fields in include CI_BBP_ACC. We are deployed

in a

Classic scenario with an ECC 6.0 Ehp5 back-end. Whilecreating/approving shopping carts in our upgraded SRM 7.01

environment,

we encounter errors and inconsistencies whenever we adjust any

account

assignment details. This is a result of structure BBPCOBL1_470 being

out of sync with structure BBP_COBL_47A in ECC.

We have encountered similar issues in the past and implemented the

changes to structure BBPCOBL1_470 as indicated by OSS note

1081297 and

related notes. However, this note is not listed as relevant for SRM

7.01. How should we proceed to get the coding block structure in SRM

7.01 in synch with ECC.

The OSS note 1081297 is vallid for SRM server 500 and 550, not validfor SRM 7.01. If we implement OSS note 1081297, would it cause

issue

for other areas in SRM 7.01 upgraded system?

Thanks,

Diana

 

Steps for Reconstruction

 

Error Message Number Screen Number Transaction Program Table

Incident Wizard https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp

10/27/2014 1

Page 2: OSS_853032

8/10/2019 OSS_853032

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oss853032 2/5

Questions Specific to the selected application area (component)

Please first check our SRM forums for possible solutions. The largest number of SRM experts is available here. Https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn

/forums -> SRM - General

"No answer"

Please indicate in your message: - SRM release and support pack level Please provide all steps to reproduce the issue, including screenshots, in

the form of a word or similar document. Kindly enter logon details in the secure customer logon area.

"No answer"

Please ensure that you provide your contact details i.e. name and phone number. Answering these questions will speed up the processing of your 

message.

"No answer"

Communication 

31.01.2012 - 19:54:47 CET - Reply b y SAP  

Hi Diana!

I compare those two structures BBPCOBL1_470 (SRM) and

BBP_COBL_47A

(backend). and the structure BBPCOBL1_470 has 124 entries and the

BBP_COBL_47A has 121 entries.

In the note 1405246 this two structres has to be equal in all the

fields, same size, same order. Those structures has to combine.

Make sure they are in the same order. Please adjust the SRM structure

asnecessary.

Kind regards,

Moacir Goelzer 

SRM Support Engineer MS

31.01.2012 - 00:26:25 CET - Info for SAP by Diana Jan

 We have opened the ECC system: SBX client 100, SRM system: EBX client

100 and portal: P3X. The login ID and password are in the logon data.

Please log in and let us know i fany issue.

Thanks,

Diana

31.01.2012 - 00:09:11 CET - Info f or SAP by Diana Jan  

We have opened the SRM system EBX and portal P3X. The login ID and

password are in the logon data. Please log in and let us know. If you

want the ECC system login. We will try to get that too.

Thanks,

Diana

27.01.2012 - 12:57:49 CET - Reply b y SAP  

Hi Diana!

The connection with the P3X is remains closed.

I check you attachment files and I observe the structure and some

fields in the same structure are diferents.

Incident Wizard https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp

10/27/2014 1

Page 3: OSS_853032

8/10/2019 OSS_853032

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oss853032 3/5

Recommended field sequence in structures can also be taken from notes:

1081297 read

1405246 read

Where same manual SE11 field sequence in SMR/ERP must be hold,

because it cannot be imported using SNOTE.

Please open the SRM and ECC systems and update in the secure area the

users and passwords for the both systems and clients.

Kind regards,

Moacir Goelzer SRM Support Engineer MS

26.01.2012 - 19:57:21 CET - Info for SAP by Diana Jan  Hi,

Due to year end support so we did not get back to you. We will try to

get P3X open for you to log in. Please give us some time.

Thanks,

Diana

15.12.2011 - 18:59:34 CET - Reply by SAP  

Hi Steve!

Thank you for the attachment and sorry for this delay in updated your 

message.

I tried accessed the P3X system through the portal but I have this

error "permission denied". Please check my attachment.

Kind regards,

Moacir Goelzer 

Support Engineer SRM

13.12.2011 - 01:06:28 CET - Info for SAP by Steven Whi te  

Moacir--

Our coding block structure in our upgraded SRM 7 system is out of synch

with the coding block structure in ECC 6. When creating a shopping

cart, the commitment item field is displayed in one our custm fields.

When validating the account assignment in ECC 6, we are receiving

errors due to the invalid value.

To reproduce the issue, please follow the instructions provided in

the "Coding Block Issue.docx" document attached to this customer 

message.

Thanks.

Steven White

09.12.2011 - 00:34:51 CET - Reply by SAP  

Dear Steven!

Thank you for your updated.

So, I couldn't see any attachment with the steps with screen shot, user,and

system.

However, according to the SAP Policy, I have to tell you to describe

one issue in this customer message.

Kind regards,

Incident Wizard https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp

10/27/2014 1

Page 4: OSS_853032

8/10/2019 OSS_853032

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oss853032 4/5

Moacir Goelzer 

Support Engineer SRM

SAP Active Global Support

Contact Information: note 560499

08.12.2011 - 20:29:10 CET - Info for SAP by Steven Whit e  Moacir--

 All connections have been activated and provied under Access data.

Please refer to attached document on how to replicate the issue. If you

have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks.

Steven White

08.11.2011 - 17:15:13 CET - Reply by SAP  

Dear customer!

I am Moacir Goelzer and I was assigned to work in your message.

I saw then you EBX connection is closed. Can you follow this steps?

1)Please provide us the information needed for our analysis:

-SRM and ECC Systems ID and Client where we can reproduce this issue(test systems, if available)

-User capable to reproduce the issue

-Example documents where this issue happened. This is happening only

with old documents, or it is reproduceable with new documents

as well?

2)Please update the Secure Area with logon info for a user capable of 

reproduce this issue, debug permission and access the transactions

bbp_pd, se18, se37, se38, se80, se95, snote, and sm30.

Please refer to note 508140 for sending the logon data securely.

3)In order to investigate this issue, we would like to connect in your SRM system using SAP GUI. Please kindly open a R/3 Support Connection

and inform the logon data following the procedure described in SAP

Note 508140.

4)Also, we will need to connect to your SRM Portal as well.

 Add a system connection: HTTPConnect - URL Access and open it.

Then maintain a URL (Icon below menu create URL'): Enter a description

and enter the complete URL. Please refer to the note 592085.

Kind regards,

Moacir Goelzer 

Support Engineer SRM

SAP Active Global Support

Contact Information: note 560499

25.10.2011 - 20:38:08 CET - Info for SAP by Steven Whi te  Cassius--

We have two issues that occur:

1. The account assignment CUF fields are being populated with the

Commitment Item when displaying the shopping cart account assignment

detail.

2. When verifying the account assignment details in back-end ECC

environment (fm B470_ACCSERV_CHECKACCASSIGNMT), the validation

Incident Wizard https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp

10/27/2014 1

Page 5: OSS_853032

8/10/2019 OSS_853032

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oss853032 5/5

fails

due to wrong value being passed.

Please refer to attached Word document for additional details on the

issues and how to reproduce.

If you require more detail, please let me know.

Thanks.

Steven White

18.10.2011 - 00:16:50 CET - Reply by SAP  Hi Diana,

Note 1081297 is valid up to SRM 5.0 only.

Note 1235193 corrected SRM structure BBPCOBL1_470 for SRM 6.0 and

7.0

and is already included in SRM 7.0 SP01.

Note 1431527 is not valid if ERP is on SAP_APPL 604 SP05 and higher 

resp. SRM 7.0 lower than SP05.

Manual steps of longtext of note 1431527 are incl. in SAP_APPL 604 SP05.

Please provide the errors you are facing and the situations they are

occurring I can help you to fix them.

Kind regards,

Cassius Guimaraes

SRM Support Engineer MS

 AGS Primary Support, Business Suite & Technology

For office contact please check note 560499.

==========================================================

DID YOU KNOW? You can find details of common issues, fixes,

patches and much more by visiting SAP moderated forums on:

http://forums.sdn.sap.com/

Contacts & Notifications 

 Att achments 

Description File Name Created from Date Time -

Coding Block Issue Coding Block Issue.docx Steven White 25.10.2011 20:37

Enter unique file description Coding Block Issue.docx Steven White 13.12.2011 01:06

P3X_permission_denied P3X_permission_denied.jpg SAP 15.12.2011 19:02

Print Action Log

Incident Wizard https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp