Upload
rina-guthrie
View
35
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Tools for Bridging the Research to Practice Gap Mary Wagner, Ph.D. SRI International. OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Washington, DC July 21, 2008. Today’s agenda. Introduce two Department of Education activities to bridge the research to practice gap - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Washington, DC
July 21, 2008
Tools for Bridging the Research to Practice Gap
Mary Wagner, Ph.D.SRI International
2
Today’s agenda
Introduce two Department of Education activities to bridge the research to practice gapWhat Works Clearinghouse practice
guides (WWC—Institute of Education Sciences)
Doing What Works website (DWW—ED Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development)
The information presented here does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Education or Institute of Education Sciencesnor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. government.
3
What is a practice guide?
Purpose: provide practical recommendations to help educators address the everyday challenges they face in their classrooms and schools.
Developed by a panel of nationally recognized experts
Contents:Actionable recommendations Implementation steps to put recommendations into
practiceStrategies for overcoming potential roadblocks Indication of the strength of evidence supporting each
recommendation Subjected to rigorous external peer review
4
WWC standards of evidenceStrong = consistent and generalizable evidence that an
intervention strategy or program causes an improvement in outcomes (randomized control trial)*
Moderate = evidence from studies that:allow strong causal conclusions but cannot be
generalized with assurance to the population on which a recommendation is focused
or are generalizable but have more causal ambiguity than
offered by experimental designs (e.g., statistical models of correlational data or nonequivalent control group design)
Low = expert opinion based on reasonable extrapolations from research and theory on other topics and evidence from studies that do not meet the standards for moderate or strong evidence.
*WWC guidelines consider a positive, statistically significant effect or large
(i.e., greater than 0.25) effect size as an indicator of positive effects.
5
Available practice guides
Effective Literacy and English Language Instruction for English Learners in the Elementary Grades
Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning
Encouraging Girls in Math and ScienceTurning Around Chronically Low-Performing
Schools
6
Example: Effective Literacy and English Language Instruction for English Learners in the Elementary Grades
Recommendations:Screen for reading problems
and monitor progress (strong evidence)Provide intensive small-group reading
interventions (strong evidence)Provide extensive, varied vocabulary
instruction (strong evidence)Develop academic English (low evidence)Schedule regular peer-assisted learning
opportunities (strong evidence)
7
Example: Effective Literacy and English Language Instruction for English Learners in the Elementary Grades
Expanded description of Recommendation 1“Conduct formative assessments with English
learners using English language measures of
phonological processing, letter knowledge, and word and text reading.
Use these data to identify English learners who require additional instructional support
and to monitor their reading progress over time.”
8
Example: Effective Literacy and English Language Instruction for English Learners in the Elementary Grades
Summary of evidence to supporta rating of strong evidence21studies demonstrate measures of
phonological processing, letter and alphabet knowledge, and reading words or text are valid ways to determine which English learners will need more intensive reading instruction
Measures meet standards of the American Psychological Association for valid screening instruments.
9
Example: Effective Literacy and English Language Instruction for English Learners in the Elementary Grades
Implementation steps: Districts should have procedures
and provide training on screening English learners for reading problems
If resources allow, collect progress monitoring (PM) data three times/year for those at risk of reading problems—weekly or biweekly for those at high risk
Use screening and PM data to make decisions about instructional support to help English learners learn to read
Use same benchmarks/standards for English learners and native English speakers.
Provide training on how teachers are to use formative assessment data to guide instruction
10
Example: Effective Literacy and English Language Instruction for English Learners in the Elementary Grades
Example roadblock:Some teachers believe reading problems
may resolve themselves when English learners become proficient in oral English, so hesitate to refer students for additional help or to provide intensive instructional support in foundational areas of beginning reading.
Example of possible solution:Districts should develop/disseminate
information asserting that no evidence supports this assumption. Principals and reading coaches can examine school data to see link between kindergarten/first grade measures and later scores on state accountability tests.
11
Practice guides in development
Reducing Behavior Problems in the Elementary School Classroom
Response to Intervention and Multi-Tiered Intervention for Reading in the Primary Grades
Adolescent LiteracyDropout Prevention
12
Doing What Works website
Purpose: to help educators identify and make use of effective teaching practices.Disseminates IES practice guides and intervention reports on effective teaching practices
Has examples from real schools and teachers (video, slides) of ways practice guide recommendations may be implementedMust have evidence of positive outcomes Implementation strategy aligns with research
13
Doing What Works websiteOffers “Planning Templates”—Tools for TA
providers to use in engaging educators and policymakers with the practices recommended by the WWC. They:Translate information in reviews into practical
policy/ program options appropriate to implementation by state, district, and school leaders
Facilitate TA providers and others having a comprehensive conversation on what it takes to implement the coherent set of practices in a Practice Guide, not partial approaches
Encourage systematic consideration of options, identifying what is in place, what new strategies might be good options, and what ideas are not likely to be feasible
Cross-reference existing DWW resources to the specific needs of TA providers and other clients
14
How these tools can be used
Professional development—what teachers and other school leaders need to know (and aren’t learning in preservice programs)
Dissemination—OSEP channels can help “spread the word”
Technical assistance—align with the best knowledge of “what works”
15
For more…
Visit the What Works Clearinghouse and Doing What Works websites
www.whatworks.ed.govwww.dww.ed.gov