Orinda Union School District

Board of Education: Facilities Master Plan Process

August 30, 2017

LPA firm overview

proposed team members

FMP components & process goals

school site & community stakeholders engagement

proposed schedule

final deliverables

LPA FMP guiding principles

presentation agenda

LPA San Diego

LPA Irvine

LPA Sacramento

51 years

355+ people

50% staff dedicated to education

San JoseSan DiegoSacramento Irvine

firm overview

Orinda USD

3

LPA San Jose

firm philosophy

integrated design a new approach for project delivery

development of high-performance learning

environments and integrated services

to transform existing school sites

small-firm service large-firm size resources

technical expertise with educational vision team knowledge

planningengineeringarchitecture graphicsinteriorslandscape architecture

4

meet your team

5

SacramentoSan DiegoSan Jose Irvine

Andrea Pippin

LEED GA

Educational Planning

Specialist

Jim Kisel

AIA, LEED AP

Principal

Dir. of School Planning

Helen Pierce

LEED GA

Project Designer

Arash Izadi

Associate

ASLA, LEED AP BD+C

Landscape Architect

developed $18.5 b facility master plan improvements in the last 22 years

envisioned 1000+ school facilities master plan sites

designed $6.5 b 350 school facilities projects

completed 60 LEED certified projects in California

completed 10 CHPS certified projects in California

dedicated K-12 team that works predominantly on the planning & design of

Next Generation High-Performance Learning Environments

experience / record of success

LPA has:

6

experience / facilities master plans

La Cañada USD

Chino Valley USD

Hesperia USD

Placentia-Yorba Linda USD

Anaheim UHSD

Norwalk-La Mirada USD

Downey USD

Paramount USD

Grossmont UHSD

Sweetwater UHSD

Long Beach USD

Los Angeles USD

Azusa USD

Arcadia USD

Temple City USD

Irvine USD

Huntington Beach UHSD

San Marcos USD

Tahoe Truckee USD

Lake Tahoe USD

Western Placer USD

Eureka City SD

Lucia Mar USD

Santa Barbara USD

Anaheim ESD

Centralia SD

Del Mar Union SD

Hawthorne SD

Norris SD

Oxnard SD

Westminster SD

Fountain Valley SD

Burbank USD

Beverly Hills USD

Centinela Valley UHSD

Colton JUSD

Dublin USD

Pleasanton USD

Redwood City SD

Burlingame SD

Sequoia UHSD

Carmel USD

Tamalpais UHSD

Fremont USD

Milpitas USD

Alameda USD

Fairfield-Suisun USD

Morgan Hill USD

Gilroy USD

Lodi USD

Modesto City SD

Galt JUESD

Merced City SD

Davis USD

50+ facilities master plans and local bond implementation programs

$18.5 b facilities improvements / $6.55 b in local bond elections

7

culture of quality | our approach

8

integrated design process

• FMP is first step in facilities improvement process

• recommended every 3-5 years by CDE and to apply for state funding

• important to engage district and local community stakeholders

• data driven decision making

• sustainable focus facilitates good stewardship

• development of high performance learning environments

• building upon Orinda Union School District mission and strategic vision

a holistic approach to problem solving

that places the client in the center

fostering participation and direct interaction

with the multidisciplinary team of specialists

client-inclusive & stakeholder drivenengineering

furniture

landscape

architecture

single-point

LPAcontact

architecture

interior

design

technology

educational

facility

planning

9

type 1 – focused – facilities needs assessment / modernization

• maintenance & repair driven

• proposed scopes managed to an available funding budget

• school & community expectations tempered

type 2 – visionary – academic quality mission & goals / facilities master plan

• starts with educational vision for how students will learn in the future

• discovers the impact of program to facilities & technology needs

• long-term phased implementation approach

defining success – “implementable road map”

approach / FMP process goals

10

Final

Facilities Master Plan

Recommendations

Facilities

Condition

Assessments

• Campus Overview

• Existing Conditions

• Health/Life Safety Issues

• Code/ADA Compliance

• Building Systems

• Visual Observations

• Local Revenue

• State Eligibility

• Voter Approved

Options

• Funding Plan

Scenarios

Financial

Analysis

• Enrollment Trends

• Site Capacities

• Student Loading

Standards

• Attendance Boundaries

• New Development

Demographics

Review

• District Mission Statements

• Guiding Principals

• Student Learning

Methodologies

• Program Standards

• Technology Integration

• Increased Student Outcomes

& Achievement

Educational Vision

& Goals

• Community Stakeholders

• District Staff & Teachers

• Parents & Students

• Communicate Needs

• Campus Master Plan Concepts

• Build Support for District Goals

Collaboration

Cost Estimates &

Prioritization

Community Outreach

approach / FMP process

11

Orinda USD in numbers:

2,500+ students

4 elementary schools

1 intermediate school

1 district office

building on good work done-to-date:

• previous master plans (2008 & 2013)

• solar projects

• measure A parcel tax (2003)

• measure B parcel tax (2009)

exp

lore

vis

ion

research

ou

treach

co

nfir

m

12

LAFAYETTE

ALBANY

BERKELEY

EL SOBRANTE

24

580

RICHMOND

CANYON

242

WALNUT

CREEK

exp

lore

vis

ion

research

ou

treach

co

nfir

m

13

research / school site condition assessments

Recent Improvements (partial list)

• Exterior paint (all sites)

• New Gen7 Classrooms (Glorietta & Del Rey)

• Minor modernization to restrooms (Del Rey)

• Wireless Technology refresh (in-progress)

• Drinking fountain / water bottle filling station upgrades (all sites)

Sleepy Hollow

Del Rey

Wagner Ranch

exp

lore

vis

ion

research

ou

treach

co

nfir

m

14

research / school site condition assessments

Common Themes of Site Needs (partial list)

• Rubberized surfacing at play structures

• Natural lighting in classrooms

• Air conditioning upgrade/system replacement

• Enhanced outdoor spaces as learning environments

• Enhanced building envelope (insulation, windows, doors)

• Upgrades to Fire Alarm and Intercom/Clock/Bell systems

• Restroom modernizations (where needed)

• Identified areas of poor drainage

• Identified buildings needing roof replacement

• Dedicated performing arts space (OIS)

• Consolidated Maintenance & Operations facility with yard, offices, storage, workshop(s)

Sleepy Hollow

Glorietta

Orinda Intermediate School

exp

lore

vis

ion

research

ou

treach

co

nfir

m

15

Orinda USD Mission Statement

“Building on a tradition of educational excellence and strong community support, we will inspire and challenge each

student through strong academics and continuously improving programs that will develop the character and abilities

needed to shape an ever-changing world.”

Strategic Directions

• Inspire Innovators and Problem Solvers

• Create Resourceful Collaborators and Critical Thinkers

• Cultivate Ethical and Respectful Citizens

• Nurture Emotional, Social, and Physical Well-Being

/ c o m m u n i t y

school site

school site visits

students

principal interviews

online staff surveys

school site

community meetings

District F

ocu

s G

ro

up

s

community

outreach

communication plan

town hall forum

voter opinion survey

district focus

groups

elementary programs

secondary programs

specialized support

programs

special

services

maintenance &

operations

athletics (OIS)

food service (OIS)

technology

school site input

community outreach

district focus groups

board of

education

facility

master plan

committee

district

leadership

exp

lore

vis

ion

research

ou

treach

co

nfir

m

16/ c o m m u n i t y o u t r e a c h

inter+act / stakeholder groups

completed

5/31/17

6/20/17

9/14/17

6/20/17

9/14/17

9/14/17

6/19-20/17

9/14/17 &

9/26-27/17

9/15/17

6/20/17 &

9/14/17

6/19-20/17

12/6/17

Facilities Master Plan Committee (FMPC)

(30-45 Committee Members Total – Meets Monthly)

District Participants

• Board of Trustees Member(s)

• Superintendent

• Business Services Personnel

• Director & Staff of Curriculum & Instruction

• Director & Staff of Facilities & Maintenance

• (6-8) Teachers & Administrators Representatives (Cross Section of Roles)

• Certificated/Classified Employee Representatives

• Parent Clubs Representatives (1/Community)

• Student Representatives

• Director of Technology

• Athletics Coaches

Community Members

• (4-6) Community Leader Representatives

• (4-6) Business Community Representatives

• Engaged Orinda USD Parents

• 2yr/4yr College Representatives

• Senior Community Representative

• Tax Group Representative

• Chamber of Commerce Representative

• Real-estate Organizations Representative

• Civic / Non-Profit Groups Representatives

inter+act / FMPC members

exp

lore

vis

ion

research

ou

treach

co

nfir

m

(Purpose is to develop District wide master plan

program/facilities vision and standards with a goal

to equally weight the total number of Orinda USD

and local community participants on the FMPC.)

18

approach / process schedule

9/13/17 10/11/17 11/8/17 12/6/17 1/23/18

prove it / the FMP “digital deliverable”

2. facilities needs assessments

1. educational program vision

3. implementation planning

• executive summary

• guiding principles vision

• educational program standards – new and existing schools

• technology readiness

• sq. ft. and physical characteristics

• campus overview

• code, health and student / staff safety issues

• classroom capacity and space utilization

• maintenance and operational efficiency

• building materials and systems condition

• school site master plan diagrams

• cost estimates

• funding source analysis and financial plan scenarios

• scope prioritization to match dollars

• communication of recommendations facilitating process transparency

19

• people driven

• research informed

• learner centered

• exploratory

• transparent

• implement-able

• long range

district stakeholder groups engaged

facilitating increased student outcomes and achievement

sustainable high performance learning environments goal

options and alternatives analysis

consensus building process

prioritized projects tied to funding

forward looking recommendations

we believe that a sustainable master plan is…

creating sustainable places and spaces that enrich the lives of those who use them

20