Upload
krzysztof
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Orientation Imaging Microscopy Applied to Zirconia Ceramics
Marek Faryna1;�, Jerzy Jura2, and Krzysztof Sztwiertnia2
1 Jagiellonian University, Regional Laboratory of Physicochemical Analyses and Structure Research, Ingardena 3, 30-060Krak�ow, Poland; Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Reymonta 25, 30-059 Krak�ow, Poland
2 Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Reymonta 25, 300-59 Krak�ow, Poland
Abstract. Measurements of crystallographic orienta-
tions along with microscopic observations are the basis
of quantitative investigations of the microstructure of
crystalline materials. The technique that applies auto-
matic orientation measurements in the transmission or
scanning electron microscope is known as orientation
imaging microscopy (OIM) [1]. In this paper the
measurements and analyses of sets of single orienta-
tions gained from electron backscattered diffraction
(EBSD) registered in a scanning electron microscope
are presented. A quantitative description of microstruc-
ture of two polymorphs of zirconia, based on measure-
ments of single orientations, is also given.
Key words: Tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (TZP); orientationimaging microscopy (OIM); orientation distribution function(ODF).
The discovery that the stress-induced martensitic
tetragonal (t) to monoclinic (m) phase transformation
in ®ne ZrO2 precipitates, particles or grains can occur
in the vicinity of a propagating crack has lead to a new
class of strong and tough ceramic materials. This
transformation greatly enhances the mechanical
properties of ZrO2 ceramics [2]. Additionally, the
incorporation of hard carbide inclusions into the
polycrystalline tetragonal zirconia matrix (TZP)
proved to be an effective way of further improving
its mechanical properties [3 ± 5]. In the authors'
opinion the nature of such a toughening may be
better understood by establishing the crystallographic
relationships between several adjacent grains. Such
measurements are possible in the transmission
electron microscope (TEM). However, in the case
of TEM several limitations still exist making the
experiment dif®cult and time-consuming. Only very
thin ®lms transparent to electrons with high energies
can be analysed. Moreover, the observed area is
limited to several grains, which may lead to false
conclusions. In such a case orientation imaging
microscopy (OIM) in a scanning electron microscope
(SEM) can be very helpful as automatic measure-
ments of single orientations of thousands of grains
together with microscopic observations are realised
during one experiment.
Orientation imaging microscopy in the SEM is a
microtexture facility for obtaining electron diffraction
data from bulk samples. This technique known also as
electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) provides a
wide range of information about the orientation of
crystals with a spatial resolution in the range of few
tens of micrometers, depending on the acceleration
voltage as well as the density of specimen. Although
the technique is known for at least two decades (®rstly
used by Venables and Harland in 1973 [6]), the
complexity of data and equipment has prevented
EBSD from becoming a standard technique. However,
recent developments in camera technology, together
with the availability of PC-driven scanning electron
microscopes, have made possible to apply this
technique to microtexture analysis of specimens
containing small grains and subgrains.
The principle of the EBSD technique is that a
phosphorus screen collects backscattered electrons
diffracted in a systematic manner and satisfying the
Bragg law. To produce an optimum EBSD signal in
Mikrochim. Acta 132, 517±520 (2000)
� To whom correspondence should be addressed
the SEM, the specimen has to be highly tilted towards
the electron beam. Information from EBSD appears as
bright bands, geometrically arranged on the phos-
phorus screen. The arrangements of these bands are
unique to a certain crystallographic orientation and
crystal symmetry. Each crystal of similar composition
will thus show a different pattern when oriented
differently.
Experimental
In this report two polymorphs of zirconia stabilised by Y2O3 werestudied using the EBSD technique. The cubic polymorph of ZrO2
stabilised by 8 mol.% Y2O3 is isostructural with mineral ¯uorite(CaF2), and has the m3m Laue group symmetry (three-fold axiswith two mirror plane) with lattice parameter a� 5.1437 AÊ . Thetetragonal form of ZrO2 stabilised by 2.9 mol.% Y2O3 has the4=mmm Laue group symmetry (four-fold axis with threeperpendicular mirror planes) and lattice parameters a� 5.1023 AÊ
and c� 5.1817 AÊ .Two discs of 30 mm diameter and 10 mm thickness, made from
both cubic and tetragonal zirconia were pressureless sintered in airin a furnace with Superkanthal heating elements at 1500 �C for 2 h.A detailed description of the sample preparation can be foundelsewhere [6]. The sintered samples were subsequently polished inthe conventional way. As the Bragg diffraction of electrons at allatomic planes in the crystal lattice occurs in a very thin layer(< 50 nm) in the subsurface of the specimen, it has to be free ofany mechanical damage produced by grinding and polishing. Toremove stresses introduced during polishing the samples wereadditionally heated at 1350 �C for 30 min (thermal etching). Basedon the assumption that the high tilt of the specimen surface withrespect to the incident electron beam reduces the amount ofcharging to a tolerable level [7], the specimens were normallyviewed without any coating. Nevertheless, several attempts weremade to collect electron backscattered diffraction images from thesamples covered with a thin carbon film to eliminate completely
the charging effect. However, it was found that due to the coating,the quality of Kikuchi pattern formed on the phosphorus screendeteriorated markedly making indexing almost impossible.
The measurements were carried out in a PHILIPS XL30 SEM atan acceleration voltage of 20 kV, tilt angle 72� and workingdistance 22 mm. The backscattered images were analysed andindexed with a NORDIF EBSD1 hardware and CHAN-NEL�EBSD software for fully automated pattern indexing. Aschematic diagram representing the NORDIF EBSD1 hardwareconfiguration is shown in Fig. 1.
Orientation measurements were performed over an area in theplan of the sample surface with grid nodes: X-direction� 200,Y-direction� 150 for cubic zirconia and X-direction� 150,Y-direction� 150 for tetragonal zirconia. The grid step was fixedat 1 mm for both cases, which corresponds to the mean graindiameter in the sample with the smaller grain size, i.e., tetragonalZrO2.
Results and Discussion
The measured sets of single orientations for both
polymorphs of zirconia have the form of orientation
maps describing the orientation topography, that is
topographical distribution of local crystallographic
orientations in the de®ned sample section. Examples
of such maps, one for cubic and one for tetragonal
zirconia, are shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The
correspondence between the colours seen in these
maps and the texture components is given in Tables 1
and 2.
The orientation topographies show that the mean
grain diameter in the cubic sample is about 3 ± 4 mm,
being much higher than in the tetragonal sample,
where the diameter does not exceed 1 mm. In both
samples a rather wide spectrum of orientations is
Fig. 1. Orientation Imaging Micros-copy NORDIF EBSD1 hardwarecon®guration [9]
518 M. Faryna et al.
observed, which are randomly distributed in the
sample space.
The manufacturing process may induce its speci®c,
statistical symmetry to the texture. In such a case,
each texture component is represented by its process
symmetry related variants. In order to check whether
these variants are present, the statistical triclinic
symmetry for the above process was assumed.
Using the orientation data from the sets of single
orientations the orientation distribution functions
(ODFs) were calculated by the method of Fourier
series expansion, assuming cubic and tetragonal
crystal symmetry for zirconia polymorphs. The ODFs
are shown in the Euler space ('1, �,'2) in cross-
section '2� constant.
The calculated ODFs are presented in the Figs. 4
and 5. The detailed analysis of these functions
con®rms the assumption of the lack of statistically
meaningful symmetry in both samples. There are only
few low local maxima observed on background of
wide scattered orientations. It is stressed that due to
the fact that analysed samples were discs the choice of
the X direction in the sample plane is chosen
arbitrarily. As a result, the '1 angle (the angle of
rotation around the sample normal) is also a free
parameter in this case. The '1 angles of all
orientations are changed by the same value with the
rotation around the normal. As a consequence, the
directions huvwi (parallel to the X direction) are
modi®ed into the other ones, also lying in the distinct
crystallographic planes (hkl).
Fig. 2. Orientation maps for the sample of cubic ZrO2, areascanned 200� 150 mm in the sample plane. (a) Orientationtopography, (b) distribution of the orientations a, b, c from theTable 1
Fig. 3. Orientation maps for the sample of tetragonal ZrO2, areascanned 150� 150 mm in the sample plane. (a) Orientationtopography, (b) distribution of the orientations a, b, c � � � h fromthe Table 2
Orientation Imaging Microscopy Applied to Zirconia Ceramics 519
Conclusions
Electron Backscattered Diffraction technique has been
successfully applied to obtain electron backscattered
patterns from zirconia ceramics, both from cubic and
tetragonal polymorphs. Due to high tilt of the
specimen surface with respect to the incident
electrons, the samples could be examined in the
scanning electron microscope without carbon coating.
In both zirconia polymorphs only certain orienta-
tions are present. Several crystallographic planes lying
parallel to the sample plane can be identi®ed in both
cubic and tetragonal samples.
At the present stage of investigations it is not
possible to judge whether these orientations are related
in some way to the sintering process.
Acknowledgements. Mr. Krzysztof Pawlik is gratefully acknowl-edged for the assistance with dedicated software for plotting theOrientation Distribution Function and Mr. Tomasz Rostek for com-piling orientation data. The experiments were performed on theequipment generously sponsored by the Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation, Bonn-Bad Godesberg, Federal Republic of Germany.
This work was ®nancially supported by the Polish Committee ofScienti®c Research under Grant 7 T08D 003 17.
References
[1] B. L. Adams, S. I. Wright, K. Kunze, Metallurgical Transac-tions A 1993, 24, No. 4, 819.
[2] A. H. Heuer, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 1987, 70, 689.[3] Zh. Dingh, R. Oberacker, F. Thummler, J. Europ. Ceram. Soc.
1993, 12, 377.[4] K. Haberko, Z. PeÎdzich, G. R�og, M. M. Bu�cko, M. Faryna,
Europ. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 1995, 32, 593.[5] M. Faryna, L. Lity�nska, K. Haberko, Z. PeÎdzich, J. Babiarz,
Mikrochim. Acta Suppl. 1998, 15, 83.[6] J. A. Venables, C. J. Harland, Phil. Mag. 1973, 27, 1193.[7] Z. PeÎdzich, K. Haberko, Ceramics International 1994, 20, 85.[8] D. J. Dingley, K. Baba-Kishi, Micro. Analys. 1990, 5, 29.[9] HKL Technology, Channel 4, Revealing Microstructure
(Manuals), 1999.
Table 1. The texture components for cubic zirconia
'1 � '2 hkl uvw Coloursattributed toorientations
a 260� 30� 10� � (159) [095] redb 170� 20 25� � (261) [3112] greenc 210� 20� 45� � (227) [3102] blue
Table 2. The texture components for tetragonal zirconia
'1 � '2 hkl uvw Coloursattributed toorientations
a 7.5� 75� 0� � (041) [100] redb 80� 60� 10� � (164) [023] yellowc 10� 85� 20� � (130) [310] greend 50� 65� 35� � (221) [122] bluee 60� 85� 35� � (681) [112] violetf 85 85 35� � (230) [001] blackg 45� 55� 60� � (211) [011] whiteh 30� 80� 75� � (721) [153] grey
Fig. 4. The ODF calculated from 30000 single orientationsmeasured on the cubic ZrO2
Fig. 5. The ODF calculated from 22500 single orientationsmeasured on the tetragonal ZrO2
520 Orientation Imaging Microscopy Applied to Zirconia Ceramics