Organizational Behavior & Leadership

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Organizational Behavior & Leadership

    1/5

    In 1959, social psychologists John French and Bertram Raven identified 5 bases of

    power and can be separated into two distinct groups, positional and personal.

    Positional power includes:

    Legitimate In each of these cases, organizational structure

    provides the basis of legitimate power. mplo!ee 1"s mar#eting

    manager, mplo!ee $"s accounting manager and mplo!ee %"s

    sales manager all have legitimate power a&orded them via their

    positions in the corporation.

    Reward 'he abilit! of o&er another something tangible in

    e(change for something wanted )*ind'ools, 1999+$1-.

    (ercising the legitimate power a&orded him/her b! position,

    mplo!ee 1"s manager is using the !earl! bonus for receiving a

    superior rating on their ne(t evaluation as a reward for wor#ing

    overtime. 0ther e(amples of reward power include raises,

    promotions, and even compliments.

    Coercive egative in nature, coercive power generall!

    involves the use of threats and punishments when a goal or

    directive is not met. 2arel! is this form of power appropriate in

    an organizational structure. 3owever, it could be inferred that

    mplo!ee 1"s mar#eting manager"s reminder of the !earl! bonus

  • 8/11/2019 Organizational Behavior & Leadership

    2/5

    for superior ratings is an e(ample of economic coercive power.

    Personal power includes:

    Referent+ 2eferent power is the power of charisma. 2eferent

    power is most often seen in a charismatic individual who e(cels

    in ma#ing others feel comfortable in his or her presence and is

    dependant upon the inclination of others to wor# harder for

    someone the! admire. 4 classic e(ample, mplo!ee % is well

    li#ed, charismatic, positive and people appear to be drawn to

    his/her personalit!. mplo!ee % uses this power to convince

    others with more e(perience, not onl! to run with his/her new

    idea, but that he/she should lead this new program despite

    his/her short tenure and lac# of team lead e(perience )*4.org,

    .6..

    Expert+ (pert power is the power of s#ill and #nowledge. If

    !ou have s#ills and #nowledge that enable !ou to outperform

    others or do a tas# that no one else can, it"s li#el! people in

    authorit! are going to listen to what !ou have to sa!. In this case,

  • 8/11/2019 Organizational Behavior & Leadership

    3/5

    being the onl! certi7ed public accountant )the degree of

    dependanc! in the accounting department gives mplo!ee $ the

    abilit! to essentiall! write his/her own schedule )the power

    relationship. sing the legitimate power

    a&orded the accounting department"s manager position, this

    re8uest is granted.

    'hus, one not need to be in a position of authorit! to have power

    )Petress, , .6..

    In 19%, 2ichard merson made the determination that dependanc! is

    the basis of power )2. merson, 19$. ;ollowing his logic, power has

    a inherentl! reciprocal relationship with dependanc!. In each of these

    sceanarios, the situation is uni8ue. ;or e(ample, mplo!ee 1 is

    motivated not b! the mar#eting manager )legitimate but rather b!

    the bonus )reward which, once received, satis7es a want )vacation.

    mplo!ee $"s s#ill set and

  • 8/11/2019 Organizational Behavior & Leadership

    4/5

    him/her to, not onl! to succeed in the adoption of his/her new wa! of

    doing things but also, to ta#e the lead in adopting his/her new idea.

    =iven that each of these situations is uni8ue to each individual, this

    would suggest that the degree of dependanc! does indeed pla! a role

    in the creation of the nature of the power relationship.

    >ibliograph!

    *ind'ools )1999+$1- ;rench and 2aven"s ;ive ;orms of Power,

    2etrieved ?/%/1- from:

    http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/[email protected]

    Petress, ).6. Power: 6e7nition, '!polog!, 6escription, (amples,

    and Implications, 2etrieved ?/%/1- from:

    http://uthscsa.edu/gme/documents/Power6e7nitions'!polog!(amples

    .pdf

    http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_56.htmhttp://uthscsa.edu/gme/documents/PowerDefinitionsTypologyExamples.pdfhttp://uthscsa.edu/gme/documents/PowerDefinitionsTypologyExamples.pdfhttp://uthscsa.edu/gme/documents/PowerDefinitionsTypologyExamples.pdfhttp://uthscsa.edu/gme/documents/PowerDefinitionsTypologyExamples.pdfhttp://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_56.htm
  • 8/11/2019 Organizational Behavior & Leadership

    5/5

    *4.org )6. '!pes of Power, 2etrieved ?/%/1- from:

    http://c.!mcdn.com/sites/www.uuma.org/resource/collection/9B6+%$+-?+41;9%;1/'!pesofPower0rgsA.pdf

    http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.uuma.org/resource/collection/09E8DC6B-0E32-4E67-AC19-AE44B1F93EF1/TypesofPowerOrgs_.pdfhttp://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.uuma.org/resource/collection/09E8DC6B-0E32-4E67-AC19-AE44B1F93EF1/TypesofPowerOrgs_.pdfhttp://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.uuma.org/resource/collection/09E8DC6B-0E32-4E67-AC19-AE44B1F93EF1/TypesofPowerOrgs_.pdfhttp://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.uuma.org/resource/collection/09E8DC6B-0E32-4E67-AC19-AE44B1F93EF1/TypesofPowerOrgs_.pdf