Upload
eliezer-pardue
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 1
The Rise of Biofuels: Sustainability Concerns and Impacts on the Oil Industry
Fuad M. F. SialaSenior Alternative Sources of Energy
AdvisorOPEC Secretariat
9th Arab Energy Conference
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 2
Outline
● Definition and types of biofuels
● World developments in biofuels production
● Environmental credentials of biofuels
● Food vs. fuels & Other sustainability issues
● Biofuels projections
● Impacts on the oil industry
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 3
Definition and types of biofuels
● Processed biomass● The output could be gaseous, liquid or solid fuel● Focus is on liquid biofuels in transportation sector● Ethanol and biodiesel account for almost all consumption
in transportation
ROW, 2%
China, 1%
Brazil, 10%
US, 17%
EU, 70%
US, 51%
Brazil, 41%
ROW, 1%China, 3%
EU, 4%
Bioethanol production in 2008 (1.12 mb/d) Biodiesel production in 2008 (0.22 mb/d)
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 4
First generation biofuels
● The feedstock is biomass: biodegradable waste and residues from agriculture, forestry, industry, municipal waste; but also agricultural products
● Biodiesel produced from oilseed crops
● Ethanol produced from high-sugar-content plants, and plants yielding starch and starch-like material
● Most of the world’s ethanol is produced from sugar cane in Brazil and from corn in the United States
● Thus consequences on food security
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 5
Advanced-technology biofuels
● Second-generation biofuels– Follow one of two main pathways:
• gasification using catalysts based on the existing Fischer-Tropsch process, producing diesel-like products
• biochemical reactions using enzymes to produce ethanol
– Use cellulosic biomass instead of agricultural crops
• can substantially expand the supply of biomass available for biofuels
• potential in minimizing issues in first generation biofuels
– R&D and demonstration stage• not commercially available until the latter
part of the current decade
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 6
Advanced-technology biofuels (cont.)
● Algae-based biofuels– Actively pursued as a feedstock for biofuels
– Algae do not require fresh water or arable land for cultivation
– Algae feed on CO2
• biofuels production and CO2 capture
– R&D stages• commercial-scale production is still several
years away
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 7
World developments in biofuels production
● Economic growth cycle from 2001–2008 led to a significant expansion in global demand for petroleum products
● Until mid-2008 the oil price was also on an upward trend
● Some investors began looking at petroleum substitutes
● Biofuels were seen as having greatest potential to substitute oil in transportation
● Biofuels initially viewed as key option to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
● In some countries, biofuels thought of as a means to reduce oil imports
● Thus, both energy and climate policies extended to biofuels
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 8
Rationale for biofuels
● First generation biofuels based on domestic feedstock can only marginally enhance energy security
● In many countries, biofuels industry runs the risk of marginalizing the rural poor and creating higher unemployment – small-scale biodiesel production could
benefit small-scale farmers and help meet local energy demand
– export markets require stricter quality standards
– increasing need for big business
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 9
Environmental credentials of biofuels
● Environmental benefits depend on location, technology and feedstock – Ethanol production in Brazil reduces
greenhouse gas emissions by 80–90 per cent, compared to gasoline
– US corn ethanol production is 10–30 per cent – Ethanol from wheat in Europe could either
increase emissions by 25 per cent, or decrease them by 65 per cent
• depending on whether lignite or wheat straw is used as a heat source in production
– Second generation biofuels typically provide 80–90 per cent greenhouse gas emissions savings
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 10
Other sustainability issues
● Biofuels could lead to competition for water resources, in terms of both physical availability and access to water – projections for 2050 suggest that irrigation
withdrawals may have to increase another 20 per cent to meet future global food demand
– water resource impacts could be large for a number of countries
– unlikely to meet future food, feed and biofuel demand without aggravating water scarcity problems
● Large-scale mono-cropping could have severe negative impacts on biodiversity
● Biotechnology (GM) offers improving crop yields– safety in the food chain remains paramount
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 11
Food vs. fuels
50
100
150
200
250
300
Jan-
80
Jan-
82
Jan-
84
Jan-
86
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
Maize, U.S. No.2 Yellow, FOB Gulf of Mexico
Wheat, No.1 Hard Red Winter, ordinary protein, FOB Gulf ofMexico
Corn and wheat price index, 1980-2008 (January 1980 = 100)
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 12
Policy measures – financial incentives
● A wide range of policies: local, regional, and national – exemptions/reductions in fuel-excise taxes– tax credits to producers/blenders– grants/soft loans for infrastructure– payments to feedstock (crops) growers– import tariffs
• Largest subsidies in the US and the EU– 2008 estimates: ~ $13 billion and $7.5 billion,
respectively– on average: ~0.45 $/lit.
• Some countries started to shift away from exemptions to mandates
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 13
Policy measures - mandates
Country Mandate Time frame
Argentina E5 and B5 by 2010Bolivia B2.5 by 2007 B20 by 2015Brazil E22 to E25 on going
B3 by 2008
B5 by 2013
Canada E5 by 2010
B2 by 2012
China E10 on going
Colombia E10 and B10 on going
Germany E5.25 and B5.25 in 2009
E6.25 and B6.26 2010 through 2014
India E5 by 2008
E20 by 2018
US 36 b gallons by 2022
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 14
Extraordinary expansion
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Glo
bal b
iofu
els pr
oduc
tion,
tb/d Ethanol Biodiesel
Global biofuels production, 2000-2008
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 15
Impact of the global financial crisis
● Since the fourth quarter of 2008 biofuel expansion slowed down – tight credit– lower profitability – less demand for energy
● Most large producing countries affected
● Projects delayed or cancelled
● Idle capacity
● Companies went bankrupt
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 16
Biofuels projections
●World Oil Outlook
●Reference case assumptions:– global supply growth will slow in the
medium term:• concerns about sustainability• impact on food prices• impact of GFC
– policy targets are not fully met:• 66% in the EU by 2020• 52% in the US by 2022• second generation biofuels contribute
modestly after 2015
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 17
OPEC reference case projections
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2015 2020 2025 2030
mb/ d
MiddleEast &AfricaAsia
China
WesternEurope
LatinAmerica
US &Canada
medium term long term
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 18
Impacts on the oil industry
● In the upstream sector:
● A higher biofuels supply scenario would assume full implementation of announced energy policies
● The ambitious announced targets are based on very large volumes from advanced biofuels
● Biofuels legislation in the EU and the US contain escape clauses
● Uncertainty over biofuels supply translates into large uncertainties over the amount of oil that OPEC Member Countries need to supply
● This signifies a heavy burden of risk:– investment requirements are very large– subject to considerably long lead-times and
pay-back periods
● Security of demand is a major concern for producers
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 19
• In the downstream sector:
• Further increase in biofuels production would eat into refinery throughputs and margins – policy initiatives may discourage investing in
needed capacity expansion
• If biofuels fail to meet the stated targets, the result could be downstream tightness– significant impact on prices, margins and volatility
• How is the complex downstream sector to be structured to withstand major disruptions– chances of losing capacity for longer periods and
over a larger area– should refiners hold sufficient spare capacity to
cover potential losses?
Impacts on the oil industry
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 20
Concluding remarks
● The economic viability of biofuels is subject to uncertainties stemming from possible changes in government policy and energy prices– Expansion over the past few years sustained by
public sector support – The economics of the biofuels industry are highly
dependent upon crude oil prices
● Changes in agricultural practices and land-use patterns are crucial to realizing large biofuels potentials – Insights into regional and local conditions and
impacts of large-scale production and use are lacking
● The biggest concern is the diversion of food crops to manufacturing fuels
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 21
Concluding remarks (cont.)
● A positive contribution from biofuels to reducing greenhouse gas emissions questioned
● Long-term biofuels targets assume very large volumes of advanced biofuels– Considerable research effort, but questions remain
whether these can be achieved technically or commercially
● This uncertainty over future biofuels supply is transmitted directly to the oil industry – Producers, in particular OPEC Member Countries,
face large uncertainties over the amount of oil that they need to supply
– Failure of biofuels to meet the announced targets could lead to tightness if refiners are discouraged from investing in the needed capacity expansion
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries 22
Thank you