Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Organization and structure of
preparedness and response
(TEIA CONVENTION)
Ministry of Environmental
And Nature Protection Republic of Croatia
HRVOJE BULJAN, M.Sc.
CHISINAU, 18.-19.09.2013.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial
Accidents (ratified 1999)
Environmental protection act (official gazette no. 110/07,
80/13)
Regulation on the prevention of major accidents involving
dangerous substances (Official Gazette no. 114/2008)
Ordinance on the register of installations in which
dangerous substances have been identified and on the
register of reported major accidents (official gazette no.
No.113/08)
Regulation on the manner of establishing environmental
damage(og 139/08)
Ordinance on measures for environmental damage
remediation and remediation programmers (og 145/08)
Agreement on Cooperation of Inspection
Services in Environmental Sector - revised
Agreement signed on 5th June 2008
Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction
Ministry of Culture
Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure
Ministry of Regional Development, Forestry and Water Management
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development
Ministry of the Interior
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare
State Inspectorate
MC
MSTI
MRDFWM
MAFRD
MI
MHSW
SI
MEPPPC
Ozone layer protection
Fuel quality
Safety reports (SEVESO)
Air protection
Waste management
Agriculture soil protection
Animal waste
GMO
Sea protection
Nature protection
Biodiversity
GMO
GMO
Noise protection
REACH
Ionisation and non-
ionisation radiation
Nuclear safety Forestry protection
Water management
Safety and occupational
Electroenergy
High-pressure pots
Mining MC
MSTI
MRDFWM
MAFRD
MI
MHSW
SI
MEPPPC
Fire protection
General environment policy – sustainable development
Sea and soil protection
Climate changes
Responsibilities -Environment
NPRD - Responsibilities
The tasks of the NPRD in particular are:
Performing risk assessment regarding disaster and bigger disaster
Estimation and threat protection plans
Coordinate, manage and direct operational command of forces in disasters and major accidents and in the protection and rescue
Performing regular duties of 112
Performing tasks of informing and alerting the population and coordinating unique alarm system in the Republic of Croatia
Cooperation with the competent authorities of other countries and international organizations in the protection and rescue in order to provide international assistance and joint action
Providing information to the public
Development and implementation of
Inspection programme
General provisions of Environmental protection Act (EPA)
– only for EPI
Articles
from 182 up to 197 from 202 up to 213
Specific provisions of EPA for coordinated inspections
– for all line inspectors
Articles
from 198 up to 201
Article 214
Agreement on
Cooperation, Article 2.
The Parties to the
Agreement agree to co-
operate, each within the
scope of their activities, in
the implementation of co-
ordinated inspection
controls related to the
environment, or individual
environmental components
and and burdens.
Clearer role of competent
authorities • In the amended text of the existing “Regulation on the prevention of
major accidents involving dangerous substances” there is no
specific definition of the “competent authority”, but different tasks of
different competent authorities are defined in the text, for example:
• Receipt of information submitted by the operators depending on the
administrative position prescribed by the regulation (upper tier, lower
tier or below threshold);
• Verification of completeness and correctness of those information;
• Management of data and of the registers/databases.
• Instead of giving the definition of the “competent authority” in
the draft proposal of the Regulation as suggested by the
comments received from the Croatian Environmental Agency
(CEA), since there is no single authority as said before,
appropriate articles with more detailed descriptions of tasks of
different authorities involved should be introduced.
• Some competences it is now clear and to be
defined in a better way. For example, the body
competent for verifications of SMS for upper-tier
and lower-tier establishments before 2008. was
unclear.
• The necessity for a better coordination between
competent authorities now is very good
• We have a COMMITTEE which is formed with
representatives from various bodies concerned and
chaired by the Ministry of Environment
IMPROVING NATIONAL
LEGISLATIONS
New legislations as Environmental protection Act, the
Regulation on the transboundary effect of Industrial
accidents and prevention of major accidents involving
dangerous substances and other laws and regulations
Facilitating documents
• SR
• SMS
• MAPP
• LUP
Major accident prevention policy
The operator to draw up a document setting
out his major-accident prevention policy and
to ensure that it is properly implemented.
The major-accident prevention policy
established by the operator shall be
designed to guarantee a high level of
protection for man and the environment by
appropriate means, structures and
management systems especially for the
tansboundary effects.
Presentation of the environment of the
establishment
• description of the site and its environment
including the geographical location,
meteorological, geological, hydro graphic
conditions and, if necessary, its history;
• identification of installations and other
activities of the establishment which could
present a major-accident hazard;
• description of areas where a major accident
may occur.
Description of the
installation
• description of the main activities and products of the parts of the establishment which are important from the point of view of safety, sources of major-accident risks and conditions under which such a major accident could happen, together with a description of proposed preventive measures;
• description of processes, in particular the operating methods;
• Description of dangerous substances:
1. inventory of dangerous substances including:
- the identification of dangerous substances: chemical name, CAS number, name according to IUPAC nomenclature,
- the maximum quantity of dangerous substances present or likely to be present;
2. physical, chemical, toxicological characteristics and indication of the hazards, both immediate and delayed for man and the environment;
3. physical and chemical behaviour under normal conditions of use or under foreseeable accidental condition
Identification and accidental risks analysis and
prevention methods
1. detailed description of the possible major-
accident scenarios and their probability or the
conditions under which they occur including a
summary of the events which may play a role in
triggering each of these scenarios, the causes
being internal or external to the installation;
2. assessment of the extent and severity of the
consequences of identified major accidents;
3. description of technical parameters and
equipment used for the safety of installations.
Measures of protection and
intervention to limit the
consequences of an accident
- Description of the equipment installed in the plant to limit the consequences of major accidents;
- organization of alert and intervention;
- description of mobilizable resources, internal or external;
- summary of elements described in three points above necessary for drawing up the internal emergency plan prepared in compliance with manuels and instructions.
• Croatian Environment Agency is
responsible for establishment,
development, maintenance and
coordination of a REGISTER of
installations with dangerous
substances for Croatia
Identification and evaluation of major hazards
• adoption and implementation of procedures for
systematically identifying major hazards arising
from normal and abnormal operation and the
assessment of their likelihood and severity;
Major Chemical Accidents
• Before
• the Event •During the
Event •After
•the Event
SMS Safety Managament System
1. Organization and personnel
2. Identification and evaluation of major
hazards
3. Operational control
4. Management of change
5. Planning for emergencies
6. Monitoring performance
7. Audit and review
Planning and emergencis
• Adoption and implementation of procedures
to identify foreseeable emergencies by
systematic analysis and to prepare, test and
review emergency plans to respond to such
emergencies;
Planning and emergenciss
• procedures for a systematic identification of
emergency situations.
• analysis of hazards and undesirable events
leading to major accidents
• an emergency response plan
• regular practice of the emergency response plan
• procedure for evaluating the internal emergency
response plan
• match with external emergency services
• Communication about the emergency response
plan
Monitoring performance
• Procedures for a permanent systematic assessment
of safety performance related to MAPP
• Safety performances indicators (SPI) or key
performance indicators (KPI) both on the proactive
and repressive side of the bow tie
• Procedure for reporting failures, incidents and near-
misses
• Procedure for analysis of failures, incidents and
near-misses
• If necessary take corrective and preventive
measures
• Communication to management and organization
Official register: procedure
•documents from
industrial site
•check by Ministry of
Environmental er on
substances, plant’s
referent •official register
•IN
•OUT •check by MENP
•Lower tier
•Upper tier
Way to Prepare for industrial accidents
Included provisions Seveso II Directive in all laws for which
jurisdiction NPRD
Rules on methodology for risk assessment and protection and
rescue plans
Risk Assessment of the Croatian from natural and
technological disasters and major accidents:
Local and regional level
The task is therefore local and territorial (regional) self-government,
based on collected data and actualized at the local level, taking into
account the type and amount of dangerous substances, methods of
storage, type of hazard (explosion, fire, emission and dispersion of
toxic gas leak ), distance from the resort and the maximum range
performance for the worst case ("worst case") and other available
information, a detailed risk assessment of local people, material
goods and the environment.
The general conclusion would be that the Republic of Croatia is not a
high-risk areas in terms of technological disasters and major
accidents in the economy, but any major accidents associated with a
natural disaster (earthquake, flood, etc.) greatly increases the
negative consequences population, property and the environment.
Responsibilities for decisionmaking
NPRD has jurisdiction:
- Control of making external protection and rescue plans in
case of major accidents involving dangerous substances
(NPRD made instruction in the making and content of external
plan)
- Coordination and command the activities of protection and
rescue (headquarters of protection and rescue, civil defense
headquarters and the commanders of the locations) and
search and rescue forces (troops and MTS corporate, civil
defense, fire brigade, operators, etc.)
- Informing and warning received by the reported decision of
such treatment
Who has the lead for the response
in case of an industrial accident?
External emergencies plans Plans -
HQ protection and rescue led by boss
of municipality / city / county / Deputy
Director NPRD (according to the
principle of subsidiarity)
Cooperation between local,
regional and national level
Action NPRD or operational and
rescue forces, which include the
protection and rescue headquarters of
the municipal to the national level,
based on the principles of subsidiarity
and solidarity.
Are there official arrangements for cooperation
between authorities?
There is a general agreement on
cooperation MENP - NPRD with SOPs
How does it work during an
industrial accident (case)?
There were no major industrial
accidents in the our border
Best practices and advices to other participants
Many projects under the UN, EU, G2G
and the other and other opportunities
for the application of the obligations of
the UN Convention and the EU
Directive
Lessons identified and lessons learned from a specific
case
There have been problems with the following cross-
border accidents:
- The case of causing garbage to our shores by sea
from Albania (the issue of financing and garbage
disposal)
- The case of air pollution in Slavonski Brod refinery
in Bosanski Brod (the problem of measuring the
parameter values, the critical values of the
parameters for that period of time when to activate
the system response and alerting the population, the
problem of communication with the government debt
that is not a signatory of the Convention)
Development and implementation of
Inspection programme
The environmental inspection work plan is aligned with:
- National Environmental Strategy and Action Plan (NEAP) and international commitments undertaken by Croatia, and is based on:
Analysed problems from previous annual reports
Databases of Directorate for Inspection, Emission Cadastre and other sources (Croatian Chamber of Economy, Chamber of Trades and Crafts, statistics...)
Article 9. Agreement on Cooperation:
- Annual Work Plan and Programme- Co-ordinated
inspection controls shall be carried out on the basis of a
mutually co-ordinated annual work plan for the following
year to be published at the web site of the Ministry of
Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and
Construction, as well as a work programme.
Development and implementation of
Inspection programme
Routine inspections
– Coordinated inspection
– Thematic inspection with
developed procedures and
guidelines for industry
sectors or other activities
Coordinator - instruction
for inspection
Non–routine inspection
– Controls related to different
complaints
– Emergency inspection
control
Development and implementation of
Inspection programme
Environmental Protection
Inspection Plans
Annually – available to
the public through web
page of MENP
(EPA Art.182)
www.mzoip.hr
Monthly
Review of Annual
inspection plan – made
by head inspector
Planning, performing and reporting Inspections
Priorities
– Environmental impact within operator’s
activity regarding Air pollution and waste generation
Production capacity
Complexity of technological process
– Risks / dangereous substances
– Compliance with existing regulations’
requirements
– Implementation of new regulations
Planning, performing and
reporting Inspections
Complex installations (LCP, refineries, petrochemicals and chemical industry, - once per year
Planning, performing and
reporting Inspections
EPI is coordinator of the inspection control on behalf of the entire inspection team (person for coordination – present during first few days of inspection control).
Coordinator organises short meeting with operator’s responsible person and informs operator about the purpose of coordinated inspection control
Planning, performing and
reporting Inspections
General information about operator
Documentation (relevant for e.p.)
Description of technological process
Input of raw materials, energy
RISKS
preparing and delivering of prescribed documentation,
Planning, performing and
reporting Inspections
Contents SR
planning inspection
activities
site visits
analysis, follow up and
reporting
accidents
report evaluation
key problems
ALWAYS IN MIND-The philosophy of
Seveso II Directive
TEIA – Performing Inspections
SMS
1. Organization and
personnel
2. Identification and
evaluation of major
hazards
3. Operational control
4. Management of
change
5. Planning for
emergencies
6. Monitoring
performance
7. Audit and review
MAPP
43
Documentreview
Interview
Site visit
Topic
Finding
Finding
Crite
rium
Suitable
Judgement
Conclusion
Follow Up
documented
Implemented
Good
Moderate
Poor
Bad
Facts
Performing Inspections
QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR SUPERVISION OF THE SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN
THE INSTALLATIONS
Performing Inspections
EXAMPLE
ASSESSING SAFETY FACTORS or
MINIMUM DATA AND INFORMATION TO BE
CONSIDERED IN THE DOCUMENTATIONS
I.Information on the management system and on the
organization of the establishment with a view to major
accident prevention
II. Presentation of the environment of the establishment
III. Description of the installation
IV.Identification and accidental risks analysis and prevention
methods
V. Measures of protection and intervention to limit the
consequences of an accident
SITE VISIT-
Performing and reporting
Inspections- Site visits
A copy of the minutes is promptly delivered to the operator
After each control a decision is taken on further proceeding
(official notification, criminal charges, decision on execution permit...)
Information on single findings are forwarded to other inspectorates and responsible bodies
Minutes are kept of each inspection control
Each inspector from the inspection team, in accordance with his/her minutes, creates report and within one week sends that report to the coordinator. Coordinator then creates final report, sends it to each inspector for approval and to operator for possible comments
Findings after each control are
stored pursuant to the
prescribed procedure.
Performing Inspections - a process
flow diagram (PFD) : Tank Storage
Safety Report must show
Linkage
Identification of Major Accident Hazards
Accident Prevention
Limiting the Consequences
Mitigation & Evacuation
Assessment of the Acceptability of the Risks
RISK ASSESSMENT
RISK ASSESSMENT
Assessment of the entire
measurement process
Non–routine inspection
investigtions of accident
Non–routine inspection
investigations of accident
Cause: Result
NEAR MISS
Proposed follow-up and
corrective measures
Routine inspections
Coordinated inspections – 42 installations obligated to obtain
integrated environmental protection requirements
Reporting Inspections
Inspectors’ reports
– Personal monthly reports
– Personal annual reports
– Reports related to thematic on-
site visits (different industry
sectors and activities)
– Reports related to accidents and
incidents
– Reports on proceedings and
findings are available to the
public on request
Inspection Directorate reports
Reporting of coordinated inspection
Public information on specific coordinated inspection shall be carried out through the web site of the MENP
The Parties to the Agreement shall prepare joint annual reports on the performed coordinated inspections and on other activities within the framework of joint co-operation
In the future
1, In the future we need to work more on
coordination, communication and
collaboration beetwen CA s, industries and
local and regional poeple.
and
2. Achieving the knowledge and
experience
Thank You for Your attention