68
Organization and Administration We are born in organizations, educated by organizations, and most of us spend much of our lives working for organizations. We spend much of our leisure time paying, playing, and praying in organizations. Most of us will die in an organization, and when the time comes for burial, the largest organization of all—the state—must grant official permission. —AMITAI ETZIONI CHAPTER TWO Principles and Practices

Organization and Administration We are born in organizations, educated by organizations, and most of us spend much of our lives working for organizations

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Organization and Administration

We are born in organizations, educated by organizations, and most of us spend much of our lives working for organizations.

We spend much of our leisure time paying, playing, and praying in organizations. Most of us will die in an organization, and when the time comes for burial, the largest organization

of all—the state—must grant official permission.

—AMITAI ETZIONI

CHAPTER TWO

Principles and Practices

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.2

LEARNING OBJECTIVES At the conclusion of this chapter, the student will:

be able to define organizations and be familiar with their elements

know the evolution of organizational theory, including scientific, human relations, systems,and bureaucratic management

understand the major components of organizational structure, such as span of control and unity of command

comprehend the primary leadership theories and skills, including the characteristics and skills of America's best leaders

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.3

LEARNING OBJECTIVES At the conclusion of this chapter, the student will:

comprehend the primary leadership theories and skills, including the characteristics and skills of America's best leaders

be familiar with the components of communication, including its process, barriers, role, cultural cues, and the uniqueness of communication withinpolice organizations

know the kind of world and related challenges and organizational implications of persons of three younger generations who are now in, or willsoon be entering, the workplace

(cont.)

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.4

LEARNING OBJECTIVES At the conclusion of this chapter, the student will:

know the kind of world and related challenges and organizational implications of persons of three younger generations who are now in, or willsoon be entering, the workplace

understand the impact of the socialization and lifestyle of the three younger generations now entering the workplace

describe the rights and interests --& legal aspects--concerning both employees and employers regarding employees' personal appearanceat the workplace

(cont.)

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.5

Defining Organizations

The word organization has a number of meanings and interpretations that have evolved over the years.

We think of organizations as entities of two or more people who cooperate to achieve an objective(s).

The first were likely primitive hunting parties. Organization and a high degree of coordination

were required to bring down huge animals. revealed in fossils from as early as 40,000 years ago

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.6

Defining Organizations

The word organization may be defined as “a consciously coordinated social entity, with a relative identifiable boundary, that functions on a relatively continuous basis to achieve a common goal or setof goals.”

Social entity refers to the fact that Organizations are composed of people who interact with one another & people in other organizations.

Relatively identifiable boundary alludes to the organization’s goals and the public served.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.7

Defining Organizations

Four different types of formal organizations have been identified by asking “Who benefits?” mutual benefit associations, (police labor unions) business concerns, (General Motors) service organizations, such as community mental

health centers commonweal organizations, such as criminal justice

agencies, where beneficiaries are the public at large

It is important to note that no two organizations are exactly alike. nor is there one best way to run an organization

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.8

Evolution of Organizational Theory

Organizational theory studies organizational designs & structures, relationship of organizations with their external environment, and behavior of administrators and managers within organizations.

The history of management can be divided into three approaches and time periods: scientific management (1900–1940) human relations management (1930–1970) systems management (1965–present)

Another important element may be added: bureaucratic management.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.9

Evolution of Organizational TheoryScientific Management

Frederick W. Taylor is known today as the father of scientific management.

He became interested in methods for getting greater productivity from workers.

Taylor recommended giving workers hourly breaks, going to a piecework system and other adjustments.

Productivity soared, the number of employees needed dropped, worker earnings increased, and production costs were reduced.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.10

Evolution of Organizational TheoryScientific Management

Taylor was highly criticized by unions for his management-oriented views. but proved administrators must know their employees

His views, published in The Principles of Scientific Management in 1911, caught on. soon, emphasis was placed entirely on the formal

administrative structure Terms such as authority, chain of command, span

of control, and division of labor were coined.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.11

Evolution of Organizational TheoryScientific Management

In 1935, Luther Gulick formulated POSDCORB, an acronym for planning, organizing, staffing, directing, coordinating, reporting, and budgeting.

Application of scientific management to criminal justice agencies was heavily criticized.

It viewed employees as passive instruments whose feelings were completely disregarded. in addition, employees were considered to be

motivated by money alone

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.12

Figure 2.1 Gulick’s POSDCORB. Source: Luther Gulick and Lyndall Urwick, Papers on the Science of Administration (New York: Institute of Public Administration, 1937).

Evolution of Organizational TheoryScientific Management

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.13

Evolution of Organizational TheoryHuman Relations Management

Beginning in 1930, people began to see negative effects of scientific management on the worker.

Movement toward human relations management began with studies by the Harvard Business School at the Hawthorne plant of Western Electric Co.

In the 1940s & 50s, police departments recognized effects of the informal structure on the organization. democratic/participatory management appeared

Many police managers saw this trend as unrealistic. employees began to give less & expect more in return

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.14

Evolution of Organizational TheorySystems Management

In the 60s, human relations & scientific management combined in the systems management approach.

This approach recognized it was still necessary to have hierarchical arrangement for coordination. authority & responsibility were essential overall organization was required

Systems management combined the work of Abraham Maslow, Douglas McGregor, andRobert Blake & Jane Mouton.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.15

Evolution of Organizational TheorySystems Management

The approach holds that to be effective, the manager must be interdependent with other individuals & groups and have the ability to recognize and deal with conflict and change.

Managers require knowledge of people, money, time, and equipment team cooperation is required to achieve these goals

Several theories of leadership also have evolved over the past several decades. trait theory, leadership styles, and situational

approaches

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.16

Evolution of Organizational TheoryBureaucratic Management

Criminal justice agencies fit the description of an organization.

They are managed by being organized into a number of specialized units.

Administrators, managers, and supervisors exist to ensure that these units work toward a common goal.

They agencies consist of people who interact within the organization and with external organizations, and they exist to serve the public.

Criminal justice organizations are bureaucracies, as are nearly all large organizations in modern society.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.17

Evolution of Organizational TheoryBureaucratic Management

Idea of pure bureaucracy was developed by Max Weber, German sociologist & “father of sociology”.

Weber argued that if a bureaucratic structure is to function efficiently, it must have these elements:

Rulification and routinization rules save effort by eliminating need for deriving

a new solution for every problem facilitate standard, equal treatment of similar situations

Division of labor performance of functions by parts of an organization

along with authority to carry out these functions

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.18

Evolution of Organizational TheoryBureaucratic Management

Hierarchy of authority each lower office is under control & supervision

of a higher one Expertise

specialized training is necessary Written rules

administrative acts, decisions, & rulesare formulated and recorded in writing

Most police & prison organizations are based on traditional, pyramidal, quasi-military organizational structure containing elements of a bureaucracy.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.19

Evolution of Organizational TheoryBureaucratic Management

Bureaucracies are often criticized on two grounds. they are said to be inflexible, inefficient, and

unresponsive to changing needs and times also said to stifle the individual freedom, spontaneity,

and self-realization of their employees James Q. Wilson referred to this discontent as the

“bureaucracy problem,” where the key issue is “getting the frontline worker . . . to do ‘the right thing.’”

In short, bureaucracies themselves can create problems.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.20

Figure 2.2The organizationas an input–outputmodel.

Another way to view organizations is as systems that take inputs, process them, and produce outputs.

Evolution of Organizational TheoryOrganizational Inputs/Outputs

A police agency processes reports of crimes and attempts to satisfy the customer (crime victim).

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.21

Organizational Structure

All organizations have an organizational structureor table of organization. written or unwritten, very basic or highly complex

The size of the organization depends on demands placed on it and resources available to it.

Growth precipitates need for more personnel, greater division of labor, specialization, writtenrules, and other such elements.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.22

Organizational Structure

In building the organizational structure, the following principles should be kept in mind:

Principle of the objective every part of every organization must be an

expression of the purpose of the undertaking Principle of specialization

activities of every member should be confinedto performance of a single function

Principle of authority there should be a clear line of authority to every

person in the group

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.23

Organizational Structure

Principle of responsibility responsibility of the superior for the acts of his/her

subordinates is absolute Principle of definition

content of each position, duties involved, authority and responsibility contemplated, and relationships with other positions should be clearly defined

Principle of correspondence responsibility & authority should correspond

Span of control no person should supervise more than six direct

subordinates

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.24

Organizational Structure

A major principle of hierarchy of authority isunity of command, placing one superior officer in command/control of every situation and employee.

The unity-of-command principle ensures that multiple and/or conflicting orders are not issued.

Every person in the organization should report to one and only one superior officer.

When the unity-of-command principle is followed, everyone involved is aware of the actions initiatedby superiors and subordinates.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.25

Figure 2.3  Chain of command.

A simple structureindicating the directline of authority in achain of command

OrganizationalStructure

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.26

Figure 2.4  Organization pyramid. Source: Adapted R. Human Behavior in Organizations, p. 349. © 1966. Reproduced by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

The classic pyramidal design, shown here, has the following characteristics:

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.27

Organizational StructurePyramidal Design

Nearly all contacts take the form of orders going down and reports of results going up the pyramid.

Each subordinate must receive instructions and orders from only one boss.

Important decisions are made at the pyramid top. Superiors have a specific span of control,

supervising only a limited number of people. Personnel at all levels except at the top and bottom

have contact only with their boss above them and their subordinates below them.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.28

Communication in the OrganizationImport and Consequences

Communication is very important in our society. People consider language an index of culture,

breeding, personality, intelligence, integrity. Ignorance or improper use of language can easily

interfere with your success and advancement. Communication becomes exceedingly important

and sensitive in criminal justice organizations, as practitioners often see people at their worst, when they are in embarrassing, compromising situations.

To communicate what is known could be devastating to parties concerned.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.29

Communication in the OrganizationDefinition and Characteristics

Today we communicate via e-mail, fax, video, cell phones, satellite dishes, and many other forms. also written letters and memos, body language,

TV & radio, newspapers and meetings

Studies have shown communication is the primary problem in administration. lack of communication is employees’ primary

complaint about their immediate supervisors Estimates vary, but all studies emphasize the

importance of communications in everyday law enforcement operations.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.30

Communication in the OrganizationCommunication Process Elements

Encoding to convey an experience or idea, we translate,

or encode, that experience into symbols Transmission

translation of the encoded symbols into some behavior that another person can observe

Medium communication must be conveyed through

some channel or medium

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.31

Communication in the OrganizationCommunication Process Elements

Reception verbal & nonverbal symbols reach the senses of the

receiver and conveyed to the brain for interpretation Decoding

the individual who receives the stimuli develops some meaning for the verbal and nonverbal symbols and decodes the stimuli

Feedback after decoding transmitted symbols, the receiver

usually provides response or feedback to the sender

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.32

Communication in the OrganizationDefinition and Characteristics

Systems of communication are usually created with formal areas of responsibility & delegation of duties.

Most criminal justice administrators prefer a formal system.

Several human factors affect communication. employees typically communicate with those persons

who can help them to achieve their aims they avoid communicating with those who do not

Communication within a criminal justice organization may be downward, upward, or horizontal.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.33

Communication in the OrganizationFive Types of Downward Communication

Job instruction relating to the performance of a certain task

Job rationale relating a certain task to organizational tasks

Procedures and practice organizational policies, procedures, rules & regulations

Feedback appraising how an individual performs assigned tasks

Indoctrination designed to motivate the employee

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.34

Communication in the OrganizationUpward Communication

Communication is often difficult and infrequent when superiors are isolated and seldom seen or spoken to.

In large organizations, administrators may be located in headquarters far from operations personnel. complexity of the organization may also cause

prolonged delays of communication Communication delays are inherent in bureaucracy.

the more levels the communication passes through, the more it is filtered and diluted in its accuracy

Many problems could be minimized or eliminatedif superiors took time to listen to employees.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.35

Communication in the OrganizationHorizontal Communication

Thrives when formal communication channels arenot open.

A disadvantage is that it is easier and more natural, and often replaces vertical channels.

It is essential if subsystems within a criminal justice organization are to function in an effective and coordinated manner.

Horizontal communication may also provide emotional and social bonds that build moraleand feelings of teamwork among employees.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.36

Communicating in Police OrganizationsConsequence, Jargon and the Grapevine

Officers must possess the ability to communicate internally and externally regarding policies and procedures that affect daily operations.

Like people in other occupations, police have their own jargon, dialect, and slang used on a daily basis. they help officers to communicate among themselves

The police also communicate with one another by listening and talking on the squad car radio. generally with codes in use since the 1920s

The police also use of a phonetic alphabet, designed to avoid confusion between letters that sound alike.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.37

Communicating in Police OrganizationsConsequence, Jargon and the Grapevine

Added to other barriers to effective communication, the grapevine can hinder communications.

It is fast, operates mostly at the workplace & supplements regular, formal communication.

On the positive side, the grapevine can be a tool for management to gauge employees’ attitudes, spread useful information, and help employees vent frustrations. it can also carry untruths and be malicious

Without a doubt, the grapevine is a force for administrators to reckon with on a daily basis.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.38

Oral and Written Communications

Our society tends to place considerable confidence in the written word within complex organizations.

Often, in spite of the writer’s best efforts, information is not conveyed clearly.

Criminal justice organizations seem to rely increasingly on written communication, with tendency toward written rules, policies & procedures has been caused by three developments: the requirement for administrative due process civil liability the accreditation movement

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.39

Oral and Written Communications

In recent years e-mail has proliferated as a communication medium in criminal justice organizations. easy-to-use, almost instantaneous, in upward,

downward, or horizontal directions E-mail messages can lack security and can be

ambiguous—not only with respect to content meaning but also with regard to what theyrepresent.

Are such messages, in fact, mail, to be given thefull weight of an office letter or memo, or shouldthey be treated more as offhand comments?

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.40

Other Barriers to Effective Communication

Several other potential barriers to effective communication exist.

Some people, for example, are not good listeners. Other things obstruct communication, including time

constraints, inadequate or excessive information, prejudices, strained sender–receiver relationships.

Subordinates do not always have the same “big picture” viewpoint that superiors possess and do not always communicate well with someone in a higher position who is perhaps more fluent and persuasive than they are.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.41

Other Barriers to Effective CommunicationCultural Cues

At least 90 percent of communication is nonverbalin nature, involving posture, expressions, gestures, tone of voice.

People learn to interpret these nonverbal messages by growing up in a particular culture, but not every culture interprets nonverbal cues in the same way.

Criminal justice practitioners must possess cultural empathy and understand the cultural cues ofcitizens from other nations.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.42

Primary Leadership TheoriesWhat is Leadership?

Probably since the dawn of time administrators have received advice on how to do their jobs from those around them.

To understand leadership, the term must first be defined, an important & fairly complex undertaking.

Perhaps the simplest definition is to say leading is “getting things done through people.”

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.43

Primary Leadership TheoriesOther Definitions of Leadership

“Influencing activities of an individual or group in efforts toward goal achievement in a given situation”

“Working with and through individuals & groups to accomplish organizational goals”

“The activity of influencing people to strive willingly for group objectives”

“The exercise of influence” In criminal justice organizations, the role might be

defined as “influencing organizational members to use their energies willingly and appropriately to facilitate the achievement of the [agency’s] goals.”

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.44

Primary Leadership TheoriesTrait Theory

Popular until the 1950s, based on the contention that good leaders possessed certain charactertraits that poor leaders did not.

Has lost much support since the 1950s, partly because of the basic assumption of the theorythat leadership cannot be taught.

Quantifiable means to test trait theory were limited, and inability to measure these factors was the real flaw in and reason for the decline of trait theory.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.45

Figure 2.5  Traits and skills commonly associated with leadership effectiveness. Source: Adapted from Gary A. Yukl, Leadership in Organizations, pp. 70, 121–125, Table 3-6. © 1981. Reproduced by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Primary Leadership TheoriesTrait Theory

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.46

Primary Leadership TheoriesStyle Theory

A study investigated how leaders motivated individuals/groups to achieve organizational goals.

Three principles of leadership behavior emerged: leaders must give task direction to their followers Closeness of supervision directly affects employee

production leaders must be employee oriented

The major focus of style theory is the adoption of a single managerial style by a manager based on his or her position in regard to initiating structure and consideration.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.47

Primary Leadership TheoriesStyle Theory

Autocratic leaders are leader centered and have a high initiating structure.

A democratic leader tends to focus on working within the group and strives to attain cooperation from group members by eliciting their ideas and support.

Laissez-faire is a hands-off approach in which the leader is actually a nonleader. this may not be a leadership style at all it may be an abdication of administrative duties

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.48

Figure 2.6  Style theory. Source: Richard N. Holden, Modern Police Management (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986), p. 40.

Three pure leadership styles were thought tobe the basis forall managers: autocratic, democratic, laissez-faire.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.49

Situational Leadership®

Recognizes that the workplace is a complex setting subject to rapid changes. states the best way to lead depends on the situation

The model emphasizes the leader’s behavior in relationship to followers’ behavior and requires that the leader evaluate follower readiness in two ways. willingness (motivation) and ability (competence)

Situational Leadership® takes into account worker readiness; readiness is defined as the capacity to set high but attainable goals, the willingness to take responsibility, and the education and/or experience of the individual or the group.

c

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.50

Situational Leadership® R1 followers are neither willing nor

able to take responsibility for taskaccomplishment.

R2 followers are willing but are notable to take responsibility for taskaccomplishment.

R3 followers are not willing but areable to take responsibility for taskaccomplishment.

R4 followers are willing and ableto take responsibility for taskaccomplishment.

Figure 2.7a Situational Leadership®. Source: Copyright 2006. Reprinted with permission of the Center for Leadership Studies, Inc., Escondido. CA, 92025. All rights reserved.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.51

Situational Leadership® S1-Telling. High task/low relationship

one-way communicationleader defines roles of followers

S2-Selling. High task/high relationshipTwo-way communicationSocioemotional support to getfollowers to accept decisions

S3-Participating.High relationship/low task styleindicates that both the leader andfollowers have the ability andknowledge to complete the task.

S4-Delegating.Low relationship/low task stylefollowers “run their own show”

Figure 2.7b Situational Leadership®. Source: Copyright 2006. Reprinted with permission of the Center for Leadership Studies, Inc., Escondido. CA, 92025. All rights reserved.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.52

Situational Leadership®

The style-of-leader portion of Fig 2.7 means that, as the readiness level of followers develops, the appropriate style of leadership moves correspondingly. a police supervisor who has a subordinate whose

maturity is in the R3 range (able but unwilling) would be most effective when employing an S3 (participating) style of leadership

Hersey and Blanchard asserted that leaders could reduce their close supervision and direction of individuals and increase delegation as followers’ readiness to complete tasks increased.

c

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.53

The Managerial Grid

In 1964, Blake and Mouton developed their managerial grid from the studies done by Edwin Fleishman and others at Ohio State University.

The Ohio team used two variables, focus on task (initiating structure) and focus on relationships (consideration), to develop a managementquadrant describing leadership behavior.

The managerial grid (Figure 2.8) includes five leadership styles based on concern for output (production) and concern for people.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.54

Figure 2.8  Managerial grid. Source: Reprinted by permission of Harvard Business Review. Exhibit from “Breakthrough in Organizational Development” by Robert R. Blake, Jane S. Mouton, Louis B. Barnes, and Larry E. Greiner, Harvard Business Review, November–December 1964. Copyright © 1964 by the Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation; all rights reserved.

Authority–compliancemanagement (9,1)

Country clubmanagement (1,9)

Middle-of-the-roadmanagement (5,5)

Impoverishedmanagement (1,1)

Teammanagement (9,9)

The five leadership styles can be summarized as:

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.55

Characteristics and Skills of America’sBest Leaders

Given today’s skepticism and distrust of leaders, it may seem there is a dearth of leadership.

A survey found that twenty-first-century authentic leaders know who they are; they do not feel a need to impress or please others. they inspire those around them & bring people

together around shared purposes & common values Usually authentic leaders demonstrate five traits:

pursuing their purpose with passion; practicing solid values; leading with hearts as well as heads; establishing connected relationships; self-discipline

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.56

Characteristics and Skills of America’sBest Leaders

Robert Katz identified three skills leaders should possess, each resulting in the achievement of objectives and goals, the primary management task.

Technical skill - those a manager needs to ensure specific tasks are performed correctly.

Human skill - involve working with people, including being thoroughly familiar with what motivates employees and how to utilize group processes.

Conceptual skill - “coordinating & integrating activities and interests of the organization towarda common objective.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.57

Motivating Employees

Some have sought to do so through justice (Plato), others through psychoanalysis (Freud), some through conditioning (Pavlov), some through incentives (Taylor), and still others through fear(any number of dictators and despots).

From the Industrial Revolution to the present, managers have been trying to get a full day’swork from their subordinates.

Many theories have attempted to explain motivation.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.58

Motivating EmployeesThe Hawthorne Studies

An important theory that criminal justice leaders must comprehend is that of the Hawthorne effect. which essentially means that employees’ behavior

may be altered if they know they are being studied The Hawthorne studies revealed people work for

many reasons, not just for money and subsistence. for the first time, clear evidence was gathered to

support workers’ social and esteem needs At least three major new areas of inquiry evolved:

what motivates workers leadership organizations as behavioral systems.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.59

Motivating EmployeesMaslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

Abraham H. Maslow (1908–1970), founder of the humanistic school of psychology, conducted research on human behavior at the Air University, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, during the 1940s.

The behavior patterns analyzed were those of motivated, happy, and production-oriented people—achievers, not underachievers.

He studied biographies of historical and public figures and also observed and his contemporaries—none of whom showed psychological problems or signs of neurotic behavior.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.60

Figure 2.9  Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs. Source: A. H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality, 2nd ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1970).

Maslow’s observations coalesced into a hierarchy of needs

He suggested needs shouldbe filled in sequential orderto prevent frustration

Maslow’s research indicatedthat once a person reaches ahigh state of motivation, he/shewill remain highly motivated,will have a positive attitudetoward the organization, andwill adopt a “pitch in and help” philosophy

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.61

Motivating EmployeesExpectancy and Contingency Theories

The 1960s, expectancy theory, states employees will do what managers or organizations want if: the task appears to be possible the reward (outcome) offered is seen as desirable employees believe performing the task will bring

the desired outcome there is a good chance that better performance

will bring greater rewards The theory will work for an organization that specifies

behaviors it expects the rewards or outcomes for those who exhibit such behaviors.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.62

Motivating EmployeesExpectancy and Contingency Theories

In the 70s, Morse & Lorsch described their contingency theory, with these basic components: among people’s needs is a central need to achieve a

sense of competence ways in which people fulfill this need will vary competence motivation is most likely to be achieved

when there is a fit between task and organization, an a sense of competence continues to motivate people

even after competence is achieved This tells managers to tailor jobs to people or give

people skills, knowledge, and attitudes they need.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.63

Gamers, Tattoos, and AttitudesGenerations X, Y, and Next Employees

Many articles and books are being written about understanding and motivating those persons of four younger generations who are now entering or will soon enter the workplace.

Generation X - persons born between 1965 & 1975 Generation Y - between 1976 & 1980. The Next generation - between 1990 &1995 Millennials - also termed Generation 2.0––

extremely tech-savvy and digitally literate 20-somethings preparing to enter the workplace

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.64

Gamers, Tattoos, and AttitudesGenerations X, Y, and Next Employees

These generations grew up amid rising crime rates, violence & terrorism; structured lives; multicultural society & resurgence of the “American hero”. police officers & firefighters commonly in the news

Almost 90 percent have use the Internet; more than half send text messages daily and use social networking sites, have a tattoo or body piercing,or have dyed their hair a nontraditional color.

They have an emerging sense of patriotism and political interest, feel special, connected, confident, hopeful, goal/achievement oriented, and inclusive.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.65

Gamers, Tattoos, and AttitudesGenerations X, Y, and Next Employees

Their television viewing habits are unique as well. Dragnet vs CSI; Starsky and Hutch vs 24; &

Three’s Company vs The Simpsons An entire generation grew up in a game world––

where reward is everywhere. gaming offers everyone the opportunity to be in

charge, succeed, and be a star With respect to tattooing, while a member of these

generations might not look twice at exposed ink or metal, administrators of the baby boomer generation might find it offensive.

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.66

Implications for the Criminal Justice Workplace

How might criminal justice integrate such individuals into a work environment with a strong hierarchy and no reset button?

The American workplace will increasingly becomea playing field of competing viewpoints and values.

The implications for criminal justice administrators are several. they should think of ways in which they can take

advantage of the motivations of these younger generations as they enter the field

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.67

Implications for the Criminal Justice Workplace

It is also recommended these leaders attempt to understand the younger employee’s preferred work environment.

Such leaders should avoid judging those whose work ethic is slightly different from theirs.

Regarding tattooing, administrators are given some control over their employees’ appearance––andmay find guidance in that arena––in a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Kelley v. Johnson. the Court said appearance regulations are generally

valid unless so irrational that they are arbitrary

Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management, 6/eKenneth J. Peak

© 2010 Pearson Higher Education,Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. • All Rights Reserved.68

SUMMARY

Most young people entering the labor force would probably like to retain their individuality, feel free to express themselves, have a sense of being an important part of the team, and realize both extrinsic and intrinsic rewards from their work.

In reality, a majority of people will work within and organization that will not meet all of their needs.

Many organizations have a highly refined bureaucracy. Whether an organization will meet an employee’s

needs depends largely on its administrative philosophy.