Upload
trinhthien
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Although stress is a concept that has interested
psychologisrs for many years, early studies on stress were
resmcted to the field of medicine.
P h y s ~ o l o ~ s t . Walter Canon (1914), had used the term stress
to describe emotional states that had detr~mental physical results
on organisms In 1935. he modified the use of the term to
descnbe the physlcal stimuli and used the term s t r a n to mean the
organism s response
Ho\\ever, rhc work of Hans Sel!e (19361 is generally
cons~dercd to bc the first major discussion on stress a s a n
exclus~ve phenomenon Sevle absented a phenomenon called the
General Adnptation Syndrome (GAS1 It was described a s the bodlly
response to prolonged stressful curumstances m the form of
p h y ~ ~ o l o p c d . psycholo@cal and behavloural responses.
The modern theonst who has conmbuted moat on stress u
L.nrur 11966 and 1971). who pomts out. that both the
85
environmental stimulus and the reacting individual are vital
ckments, in the stress process.
In thls chapter ~t 1s auned to renew the earher studies m
stress to find out some of the ways by which stress rntght anse, to
consrdcr tts out come and low stress IS resolved The renew 1s
dindcd Into lour pans, b u
S h r d ~ r s on mprnq styles of stress, and
Shrdles on stress tn dtfferent s e c o n tncludlng banks.
tnchanng bank
A.K. Snuasmm (1985) obtalned data from 400 first line
techntul .upenvwra. Role stress x a l e of Ruzo, House and
86
Lr tanrrn (1970) war employed to a r e a s the subjects' role stress.
The J o b Anxiety S c d e atandardised by Sriycrstam (1974) was
used. One of the seven subscales of the Employee's Motivation
Schedule standardized by Snuastatm (1984) was administered to
the Ss to assess h e i r lwel of work related need for achievement.
f h e results md~cated that the employee's 11-Ach markedly
moderates the role stress-job anxtety relat~onship.
Moms and Snyder (1980) ~n theu study on 262 public sector
employees, found that need for achlevemcnt and need for
autonomv la~led to pronde convincing emdence of penCasive linear
mudrrattng ellecrs between role stress variables. role confl~ct and
role ambigu~ty and thc outcomes organlsatlonal commitment, job
~nvolvcment, psvrhosomatlc complaints and propenslp to leave
the organ~sa t~on
In order to understand the moderating effects of need for
ach~wement . the charactenst~cs of ind~vlduals who are high m
nerd for ach~cvcmetn should be examined In terms of the
tnsrrument used in t h ~ s study [Fnes and Knox. 19721, htgh-need-
for-ach~evement md~v~dualn possess the fo l lomg charactensttcs
(a) they are mom goal-onented; (bl thev p l a n w a t e r e rnphas~s on
accompliahmg udcs a r qu~ckly a s possible (c) thq plece p e t e r
emphasis on exerttng theu best effort and (d) they p l a a more
emphasls on success than on bang self-contented. These
charactenst~cs show that, when h~gh-need-for-achiwement
mdivlduals ncelve conflicting demands from theu role c ~ t , they
face greater obstacles m efficient task accomphshment Thus. it
also seems reawnable that h~gh-need-for-ach~evement mdtvlduals
are more dmsatlsfied w t h lntersender role confl~ct
Hangopal (1980) obtalned data from 100 supervisors
working In a publtc sector undertaking and ~nvestigated the
p.rsonal~t\ factors ego strength and dornlnance vs
subm~sstvrriess a s moderators of the reiat~onsh~p between role
srrrss var~ables and companx sat~sfact~on and job ~nvolvement
Thc results suggested that htgh ego strength subjects reported less
of role confltct than thc low ego strength subjects
Snuasrata (1984) obtalned data from 120 male Indian
managera [age 35-51 years) on ego strength, job ~nvolvement and
occupottonal stress Subjects uith h ~ g h ego strength expencnced
mtld a m 8 8 a n s m g from role confltct relative to that expencnced by
SubJecta w t h low or moderate ego strength S~rndarly Subjects
wth hgher job r n ~ l v e m e n t also experienced lower a m s a than
88
those with low or moderate job involvement. The results indicated
that ego strength and job involvement interacted to moderate the
effects of atrear.
Abdel- HaLm ( 198 1) INvestlgated whether employees ability
acts a s a moderating factor on the rclaaonship between role
confict and mmnsic - aatlsfact~on. He collected data from 89, (30-
65 years old) m~ddle-lower managenal personnel from a large
manufacrunng company The results faled to mdlcate any
moderat~ng effects
Olpcn (1963) colltctcd data from 91 mtddlc- managers on
mle stress pcrsonallh. and measures of psychological and physical
straln The rr la t~ons be twen role confllct and psycholog.lcal stram
were stgn~flcantlv positive and hlgher among type A than type B
pcrbonal~ties Results highhght the role of penonahcy factors in
detemunmg how people react to d~fferent kurds of smss
Dhadda (1990) s tud~cd the mlatlonshlp of role a t m a , job
tnvolmmr and p m o n a l ~ t y ~ p e s in awation and railway o f f i d .
The umplc conmeted of 50 mlway and 50 aviation offianla. For
the purpose of the study, the ORS scale (Pareek, 1983~). the Job
lnvolvemetn Scale (Lodahl and Kejner, 1965) and the Type-A /
w - B Scale (Bortner, 1969) were administered to the
respondents.
M~nal (19921 studied role stresses in relation to coping
styles. locus of control and personal~ty type using a sample of 147
doctors belonging to both private and government hospital
scttlngs
P A' Sntasrola and $1 M S ~ n h n 119831 ~nvestlgated the effect
of c m p l o ~ c r s ego strength and lob ~n\.oi\ement on thew expenence
01 role stress arlstng from role o~erload role amblgult\ a n d role
corlfl~ct f h r \ op~ncd that thesr tuo r.anablcs arc of central
Importance In lnflucnclng rmplo\+res behamour and adjustment
on the job
4.1.1 8- and Background fhcton
The background variables atudied by Sen (1981) in rrlation
to role rueem were age, sex, educauon, income, farmly type,
rmrital status, residence, distance from residence to place of work.
distance from place of domicile to place of work, entry a n d
prevlous job experience. Some of the conclusions draw by Sen
were that role etagnation decreases a s people advance in age, age
18 negauvely related with role stress. Women experience more role
stress a s compared to men. Role stress ia inversely related to
mcome; the h~gher the tncome, the less 18 the level of reported role
stress. Unmamed persons expenence more stress than married
persons This may be due to thetr cornparaove lack of security
nerd, rcsult~ng In h~gher self-esteem, autonomy and self-
actualuat~on needs Persons from urban background made
expenence more stress
Bhatnagar and Bose [ 1985) made and attempt to ~dentlfy age
and leadersh~p srvlrs a s correlates of 10 types of role sursses . For
thts purpose. Leadrr Elfectlveness and Adapcabihty Descnpuon
(LEAD) (Heraey and Blanchard, 1972) and ORS Scale (Parrek,
1983cl wem admtnlstercd Means, SD and Person's product
moment coeffiaents of correlaoon were used to a n a l p the data .
The frndrngs of d ~ e study revealed that branch managers scored
l o r n on role unb~guity, self-role &stance and role stagnaaon
tndrcat~ng that respondents do not really experience major
stresses ul these areas.
Beena and Poduval ( 199 1 ) studred gender differences m
relatton to the work stress w t h age a s an Independent vanable
The sample conststed of 80 first-level execut~ves of a large
industrial organltation A 25-~tem work stress related scale was
der.elopcd b, ustng ttcms from the Htggmgs' scale (1991) The
findrngs of the s ~ u d \ indicated that stress expenence of the
cxecutt\rs ~ncreased uith advanctng age Sex u a s also found to bc
s major fac!or affecting the stress condttton
Tnk11!9;31 in his stud\ of 226 salesmen crnplojed b\ a large
rnunulacturcr of pharmaceuttcal and health products. s h o ~ r s that
length of srn1ces in his present posrttons u a s not found be
stgnificantl! related to role strarn Sirn~larly Rrchardson, and
Stator. (19741 ~n theu stud) among sales w l s In a department
store mdtcated that overall department store expenence and
length of s c m c e wrr unrelated to role stram These two s t u d ~ e s
show that length of s e ~ c e may not ~nfluence role strarn among
u l e s persons Robably because of the nature of t h e r jobs. No
sagntficmr c o m l a t ~ o n was obtmned between Job tenure and Job
92
stress by Graham (1983) in his study on 9 0 professional country
employees, and Singh (1983 in h ~ s study on 205 s u p e ~ s o r y and
administrative personnel.
Pelnt (1973) found a negatlvc nlacionsh~p between role
bonflict and age Parasuraaman and Aluno (1984) o b t l n e d data
from 217 employees of a medium-s~zed food processing plant.
Results showed that increasing age was assoclated wth abll~ty to
tolerate stress But one cannot full\. stress the fact that wth
increase m age, confl~ct will be lesser Moreover, contrad~ctory
find~ngs have been obtalned in other s t u d ~ e s Madhu and
Harigopal (19891 obta~ncd data from 65 techn~cal and non-
t cchn~ra l supcnrisors cmplo>ed in a major public sector industry
I t uan found char Role confl~c! was sign~ficantl\ and posrtlvely
correiared wwth age for the techn~cal sample and the pooled
sample I t \sar argued rhar a s age (and also experience) increase
one tends ro establish a set of stabillad role expectauons and may
become less mduct~ve to change his behamour
Mahmoud Tnlo (1978). Graham (1980) m their studies
found chat age wcls not s~gntficantly related to role s m . Sin&
(1983) also found that age aplyed a much smaller role m
perception role conficts.
Education plajs an Important role m the expenence of
confl~ct Pelt~t (1973) In h ~ s study, observed a pos~tlve relat~onshrp
between role confllct and level of educat~on. I e . he found that role
confllcr was p o s ~ t ~ v c l ~ related (1973) dld not find any slgnlficant
rclat~onship berween these vanablcs Slngh 11983) found that
education played a srnallc: role ~n the pcrceptlon of role confllct.
In another s t u d \ . Ahmad and Khanna 11992) ~nvestlgated
rhr r r l i l t~onsh~p brr\rrrn job strrss. job satisfaction and job
~nvolrrmrnr among 50 rnlddle Ir\rl hotel managers (aged 22-36
vrars) Thr a n a i s s ~ z of the data rr\eaied a srgn~ficant negatlvc
mlationship twturen job stress and job sat~sfact~on irrespectl\-e of
the subjrcts' KX, manta1 starus, rducation and expenence
Occupar~onal s n e s s was reported to be negat~vely comlated w t h
p b mvolvement, and the h ~ g h job ~nvolvement group was more
uc~sf ied w t h thew job &an the low job ~nvolvement group
Pandey (1997) conducted a study to determine- the
relationship between personal demographics and organizational
role stress. The study was conducted on 61 personnel of Indian
Railways (aged 28-58 years ). Rol stresses were measured by
administering the Organizational Role Stress Scale (Pareek,
1 9 8 3 ~ ) . The analysis revealed a positive but non-significant
relationship of age with all the dimensions of role stress except
role ambiguity. Similarly, education showed positive but non-
significant correlation with all the 10 dimensions of role stress.
Expenencc was reported to be positively and significantly
assoc~ated w t h ~nter-role distance, role expectation conflict, role
a m b ~ g u ~ t y , personal ~nadequacy, role stagnation, role erosion, and
self-role distance.
The m a n findings of Kumar's (1989) study mdicated that
unmamed executives, executives marned to worlung women, and
marketing executives experienced significantly higher total role
stress. Role stagnation. and personal inadequacy were found to be
significantly higher among lower level executives.
4.1.3 Stress and Organhational Variables
Pamsumman and AluRo (1981) identified a number of
sources of stress (Stressors) in the- work environment and
examined the relationship of contextual, task and role related
variables to such stressors.
Das (1982) has reported that negarlve work group climate
and powerlessness may be dominant causes of stress expenenced
by lndran managers, than role ambiguity.
Das (1982) has reported that work group climate is a n
important cause of managerial stress and perceived power is the
second most potent cause of managerial stress. Role arnbigulty did
not anse a s a significant cause of stress. Thus, negative group
climate and powerlessness may be domlnant causes of stress
experienced by Indian managers.
Jagdish (1983) investigated the relationship of occupational
stress with job satisfaction and mental health of first level
%
superviwrm u r d found that occupational stress arising fmm role
overload, role ambiguity, role conflict, group and political
presmures, responsibility for persons, their participation.
powerlesmness, poor peer relations, intrinsic impoverishment. low
status , strenuous workmg condiuons and unprofitability
sign~ficantly unpav the supenisor s job satisfaction, overall a s well
as area-wae.
Research psycholog~st Sand1 Mann of University of Salford
( 1998) stated that employees who are under increasing pressure to
appear enrhusiast~c, mterested. cheerful and fnendly at all times
In their work place are highly stressed
Jenni/er Srnlth (1998) stated that work place buily~ng
consistmg of \?ctirmsatlon, pressure management. long hours,
diflicult dutles, lack of suppon and unsought promotion, results
In stress. She advocated that managers should be aware of change
In atmosphere among staff, hold agenda free meetings and
conduct exlt lntervlewa to dent@ work place bullymg.
Moms (1980) conducted a study on 3 widely diflering - vocational groupings (professional, clerical and manual employees;
55, 129 and 75 subjects respectively). Results ind~cated that
comparattve influences of role confl~ct and role ambiguity differ
with respect to the outcomes - organisational commitment, job
~nvolvement, work - related psychosomatic illness - with respect to
d~flerences tn the complenty of roles
hrnble (1980) tn hls study on 80 dtstnct agriculturists
~agncultural cxtcnslon agents) found that tolerance of arnbtgulry,
agc extcnston tralntng and extenston expenence acted a s
moderat~ng vanablrs In some of the relationshtps bctwcen role
srrcss and var~ous personal outcomes
Grrenr 119801. m hts s t u d \ , obtatned data from 247 sentor
sctenttsts and englnecrs emplo\ed m the research and
de\~elopmenr dlmslons of a n alr frame manufacturer, a n electrontcs
and buslncss equipment firm. a n d a paper products
manufnctumr The object~\,e was to assess the moderat~ng effects
of formnlraaoon on the relauonship bemaen major forms of
~denuficatron : the profers~onal. orgamaaoonal, mrxtd'. and
mbfferent ~dcntlficationa. \nth role streso v ~ n e b l e s . Results
ruggerted that identification with one's profession and-not with
the organisation war associated with stronger feelings of role
conflict and dienation, particularly within more formalined
organiretional settings.
House. R u m . &RLmQn 11970) tn thetr study found that the
spec~fic organtsat~onal practices whtch tend to be assoc~ated w t h
hlgh mle conficr are goal confltct and lnconststenc)., delay in
drctslons, d~s ton ton and suppresston of tnforrnanon and vlolabons
of the cham of command
S u e of a n organtsarion IS also a causal armbute of role
confl~ct Alan and Slanton 1197 4) In thetr study found that medtum
- sued departments seemed to tnclude mom role - stram than
e ~ t h e r larger or smaller dcpanments
Cummmgs and Elsalrm (1968) obtamed data from 425
managern of Amencan buuness organlsatlons Company amc was
mea8ures thmugh the total number of managrment and non-
management employees in the company. It was found that small
companies were associated with more need fulfdment than both
medlum - arzed and large cornpanlea.
S u p e ~ s o r ) . behanour and attitudes of role-senders to t h e ~ r
liubordinates has a n Important ~nfluence In causing role confict
Slote (1971) In hls study explored two aspects of role confl~ct, job
confl~ct and ~nterpcrsonal confllct It was found that whlle role
confl~ct and communlcatlon patterns d ~ d show s~gn~ficant Inverse
rc la t~onsh~ps the\ urrc based on the critlcall!. d~fferent and
d~yuncttvc pcrceptlons of the d \ad partners
B e v r Vctonn and .Alien ll98J) In thelr stud! matched the
mk expectations of 887 lndustnal managers to percel\.ed and
actual expectatlona held for subjects by thew unmedmte supcnors
All the vanance was found to come dvectly from the managers
pr r rp t lon of the supenor s exprctatlons.
Gmham (1983) in his study revealed that significant
comlationn existed ktween the employees' job streu and leader
khaviour description questionnaire acores of the diatrict
programme leaden' leader behamour. k initiation structure and
consideration Korea of the dintrict programme leader incr-,
the job ntresr Korea decreamd. Simiily, Kenneth (1983) in his
rtudy of 116 sales persons indicated that sale s u p e ~ s o r y
khnviour, consideration, initiation structure, participation and
feedback wm related to sales force perceptions of rule stresa.
Schular (1980) surveyed 382, high, middle and low level
employees m a large rnanufactunng finn. Data showed that
partlclpat~on m decla~on malung was negauvely related to role
conhct From thew studies, 11 can be suggested that, the h~gher
the lnltlatlon and cons~dcrat~on of the supenor the lesser the
conn~ct faced by the focal persons \58.720%~86
V13
h n a s (1969) m h ~ s study found that arpenenced role
confbct to k hyhly comlated wth W m e n t wth ones
rupenor over the d e g m of authonty to docate orguusaaonal
reguda, e g , p y , promotlonr, etc , to one a subordmates. He a h
found that p c m g managen a hrgh delpn of authonty to define
their own jobr had no significant relationrh~p to the degree of role
conflict.
House. h. Ltemnn (1970) In thew study found that role
confbct to be lower under c o n d ~ t ~ o n s m wh~ch superiors arc
descnbed a s more frequently engapng In emphasrnng production
under cond~oons of uncenamry. provldlng structure and
standards, facllitatmg team work, toleratmg upward ~nfluence
Commun~car~on uith the role senders or to h ~ g h e r level
aurhor~r\ has a sign~ficant lnfluence In causlng confl~ct.
Wtnharnpcr and Kenr 119841 In thclr stud\ exam~ncd assoclatlons
k r u e e n SLX o r g a n ~ ~ a t ~ o n d l commun~car~on processes and job
srrTss . ~ n d the relatt\c Importance of communlcatton processes m
explaining rhc presence of stress Results suggest that c e n a n
commun~ca t~on processes, especiall\ supervlson and top
management communication, ma\ pla\ an important role In
provoking s trrss
4.1.1 B t r e u m d Job Pecforrmnce
An employee n a n organuatlon performs m accordance wth
vanous relevant expectat~ons of others around hun HIS
performance In the organmtlon depends on task acuvltlcs,
behavloural settlngs a s well a s patterns of interpersonal
connecrednrss' Somet~mes such job actlwtles or job roles
threaten to exceed the occupant's capacltles and produce role
stress The emot~onal, p h y s ~ o l o ~ c a l and behanoural responses to
expcnenced s m s s are greatly Influenced by personal attnbutes
and experiences u h ~ c h . In turn, may lnfluencc an mdlvldual's
output
A.K Snvastava (19831 attempted to explore the stress-
performance (productron) mlanonsh~p, considering the latter as a
determinant of the former rather than vice versa. The study was
conducted on a p u p of 60 akillcd workers with equal number of
h ~ g h (N-30). The find~ngs of the study established that employees
who maintained a constantly high production level by virtue of
thew attributed productivity perceived and experienced less role
stress a s compared to employees with low production capacity.
Schuler (1975) reported that at the lower and middle level of
the organ~aatlon, role ambiguity 1s negativeiy related to job
performance but this was not found at the higher lwei of the
organlaation. The lack of s~gnlficant relatlonship at higher level is
because, as the employees in organlsatlons are promoted, they
acqulrr skills or coplng uith role ambiguit).
Brehr 11976) tn his studv on 331 employees of a large
manufactunng firm and Persuraman (1978) on 217 members of a
food-prcxess~ng company, report that role-ambiguity was found to
have h~ghcr negatlrr relatlonship with performance lor employees
at h~gher Irvel a In an organlstltlon that a t lourr levels.
Expenencc or job tenure IS Wtel!. to moderate the
rrlatlonshlp k t w n n job amblgu~ty and performance. Chonko
(1979) mhca tes that low performance 1s related to arnblgu~ty for
l e u expcnenced d e s people. Less e x p e n e n d sales people often
fmd themselves in new rituations. requiring new information.
whereas for experienced sales people certain aspects of their jobs
tend to become 'routiniacd'.
Efendroglu (19791, based on data from 54 tellers worlung at
two banking mstltutions md~catcd that performance feedback may
positively affect the degree of perce~ved role a m b ~ g u ~ t y a s caused
by the non-exlstencc or non-clanc of behavloural requuements
Bernard~n (1981) found that for patrol oficers, a m b ~ g u ~ t y was
s~gn~ficantly related to the wrgents overall performance rarlngs.
Madhu and Hangopal (1980) In t h e ~ r study camed out on 65
male suprntsors I c . (40 tcchn~cal and 25 non-techn~cal
supewisorsl reported that role amblgulry was negat~vely related to
job performance onl? for the non-techn~cal sample
Peetarn Sngh and Asha (1983) from theu studv on 60
manage- from 3 eategones (Ch~ef uecuuve , departmental head
and supemsor) from 40 organlsatlons compnsmg 10 mdustnes
found that o r g a n ~ ~ t l o n d non0mnovaUon. poor man-
performance and inadequate utilisation of human skrlls are results
of role ambiguity.
M~cheals. Ronald (1983) in their study on 1.005 purchasing
profess~onals found significant and inverse relationship between
role confict and hlgh performance.
4.2.2 S t m u and Job Ihtlshction
Job satisfaction is a general attltude which 1s the result of
manv specific a t t ~ t u d e s In three areas, namely. spcclfic job factors.
~r~d~vidui i l r h i l r ~ c t ~ n ~ t ~ c s and group relationsh~ps ou ts~de the job
Job factors rrfrr to wagrs. supen*lslon, s tead~nrss of employment.
renditions of work, advancement opportunities. recognition of
abilin., fair evaluation of work, socral relations on the job. prompt
settlemenf of grievances, fa11 treatment by employer, etc.
lndivldual characfenstrcs refer to age, health, temperament.
d e s ~ r e s and levels of aspnatlon. Group relat~onsh~ps outslde the
job are h ~ s farnlly relationsh~ps. social status. recreational outlets,
and acurqt?. In o r g a n ~ s a t ~ o n s - labour polit~cal or purely social. Job
aabsfact~on plays an imporrant role m terms of its rc laaonsh~p
with role conflict. Unless a n individual feels satisfied with his job
intrinsically and extrinsically, he might experience stress in his
role. lntr ins~c aspect of work refers to the satisfaction and
enjoyment a man feels from performing hrr job well. That is, the
degree to which a worker takes an actlve interest in co-workers
and company functions and desires to contribute to job-related
decisions. E m s i c aspect of the job means the value of the job
and social status assoc~ated with it. It has been found that the
higher the role conflict. the lower the job satisfaction (Srilatha,
1991)
House. R z z o and Lrtzrnan (197011n thew study found that
there exisrs lourred degrees of need fulfillment w t h ~ncrcased role
confl~cr Need areas associated uith work itself, the reward system.
and the pleasantness of the soc~a i enwonment appear srrmlarly
affected.
Kmnf (1966) In hls study found that role conflict was
negatrvely related to aatrsfact~on wth the job, the organraatlon and
especlPlly the manager
Miles (1974) reported that experienced role conflict related to
adverse personal outcome, that is, job dissatisfaction.-He found
that both are mutually causative. Keller (1975) also confumed a
negative relationship between role confl~ct and job satisfaction.
Schuler (1975) obtained data from 33 1 employees of a large
manufacturing fum. The sample was divided into three
organisational levels : higher level - upper level managers.
Rofess~onal employees, middle level-middle-level managers, and
cntn. . Ir\.el profess~onals The result lnd~cared that a t lower levels
of the organlsatton, role confllc~ has a stronger negative
relatlonshlp uqth job satlsfactlon than at h~gher level employees
havr acqu~rcd or hove had more sk~lls ro handle and ut111se role
confl~cr than thc m~ddle level rrnplo!ees
Kahn (196 11 also ~ndrcates that role confllct IS more svtssful
and dlssatlsfylng In lower level posltlons, because the employee IS
mom dependent on h ~ s supenlsor and has httle power to ~nflucnce
hun The employers tnablllty to cope adequately w t h role confl~ct
when he 1s h~ghly dependent on h ~ s supenisor should t h u s lead to
d~s.etisfacuon wth the job
Senatra (1977) in his rtudy found role conac t to be
s~gnifcantly related to low job satisfaction. Same findings were
confumed by Carter (18781.
Ahmed (1981) obtaned data from difIerent technology
organraatlons Manufactunng and Banlung (N - 89 and 81
managenal and n o n - m a n a g e d personal nspcct~vely). The results
showed that role confllct was associated w t h lower work
satlsfact~on for ~ndtvlduals on simple. low-scope jobs In long-
l~nked (manufacrunng) techno lo^ and for ~ndlvlduals on complex.
h ~ g h - s c o w jobs in mediat~ng I s e n ~ c e ) techno lo^
Bemardm (1981) In his stud\ on 53 patrol officers, found
role confllct to be slgnlficantly related to satlsfactlon u ~ t h the work
~tself and uith supcn-tslon S~milar hndlngs were obtalned by Cold
well, (19811 on tuv samples of 100 black mdustnal workers each.
But s~gnlficant d~fferences were also obtamed between rugrant
and non-migrant black uvrkers w t h regard to t h ~ s aspect
Dabronrka (1981) diecussed problems (conflict situations) in
the process of rcalizatron of professional roles. These imply
undesirable consequences for the indiwdual an4 for the
organiaation a s a whole. Such consequences include
d~ssat~sfactron with work, decreased eflicrency and distrust of
supemaor 's and co-workers.
Snvastava and Parmar (1981) In t h e r study obtamed data
from 62 supervisors from 2 textile mllls Results Indicated a
negative relatronsh~p between role confllc~ and job sat isfact~on
However, the rnagn~tude of the relat~onshtp depended on the
instrument used for rneasunng sat~sfact~on
A number of other studies also support a negatlve
r r l a t ~ o n s h ~ p between role conf?~ct and job sa t~s fac t~on . (Slngh.
1983. Coldwrll. 1984. J a g d ~ s h and Snvastava. 1984)
4.3 8TRL88 AllO COPING STYLES
D Q u ~ c k (1979) concluded from thelr study that
organrzot~onal techn~ques hke Role Analvs~s Techn~que (RAT).
work rrdes~gn, job ennchmenr, performance planning and
mdtwdual techn~qucs like se rob~c exercrse. relaxahon respon8c
and psychotherapy are preventive techniques which help to
Improve quality of work life and also individual and organizational
effectiveness.
The study by David C. Ganster and Marcelhe. R. Fusilier
and Bronston T. Mayes (1986) examned the role of social support
m the expenence of work stress The results indicated that social
suppon shows a consistent relation wlth a vanety of stress
outcomes
Kaur and Murthy s (19861 study revealed that avoidance
strategtes were predominant a t junlor management level and
approach strateg;les were predominant for senior level
management personnel of publ~c and pnvate sector organisatlons.
Ahmad. Bhatr and Ahrnad (1990) studled smss and copmg
strateper among executive technocrats and found that whlle men
used defens~vc sntle more often than women, females largely used
the approach swlc of coplng
The rtudy by Shailendra S ~ n g h and Arvind.K.Sinha (1984)
ident~fied three categories of coping strategies, namely, s t rateges
w h ~ c h act on the w u r c c of stress, strateees which act on the
symptomatic efkcts of stress and that which acts a s a n escape
from the source and effects of stress.
Sam Bat l~va las (1990) comparative study between Indlan
and Amer~can execut~ves at the organ~sat~onal and personal level
revealed that I n d ~ a n executives experienced more personal
strrssors than thew Amencan counterparts, but they compared
f a ~ r ! ~ ucll uith t h e ~ r Amencan counterpans In the organ~sat~onal
frorlr T!lc aurhor concluded that thcrc IS no one best coplng
technlqucs and each person learns from h ~ s her oun personal
expcncnce to transform stress Into a n asset
liagan Norman. 1 . and b g a n Han!.a (1995) reported that
psvcho-educat~onal tralnlng programs helped to reduce job smss
and lmprove job performance. Royal Bank financial group.
Toronto has also tracked with surveys that ~ t s flexible work
arrangements (FWA's) whlch included job-shanng, fledtime.
compressed work weeks and work-at-home arrangements, helped,
to reduce work s tress and thereby reduce intention to quit' and
'abuntecism' and also increase employee efficiency and business
effectiveness.
Helen Whitten ( Jan 1997) revealed that ' m d maps whlch
is a method of organising thoughts and mformatlon usmg key
words and Images. helps mdicnduals m suess management The
technique is based on undmtandmg of all aspects of the
mdicndual s ltfestyle includmg family, work. fnends, leisure, sports
and so on. in order to help him develop appropnate stress
management s u a t e g ~ e s
Stephen Palmer (Apr 1997) describes problem-focussed
approach consisting of identifymg the problem, selecting goals.
exploring options, cons~denng consequences. malung decisions.
takmg actions and evaluating the strategv, as an affect~ve
approach which can be applied to stress counselhng and stress
management trammg.
Weslcv Sime (Apnl 1998 hlghhghted on the new perspectives
m the field of R o p s a i v e Relaxanon (Mcguigan and M m u n d
Jawboon Apnl 1998). 'Bmfeedback and also on the usage of a n
0bjNXlve instrument to document relationsh~p betweenjob stress
urd employee00 satisfaction and productivity (Settcriind and
L.ruon. 1995).
Roben Holden (Apnl 19981, a stress consultant, stressed on
laughter. happmess, poluuve outlook and a joyful h e m as jolly
good m c d m n n for streas.
JenlfIer Smlth (Apnl. 1998) emphasiscd that organisational
coptng approaches go a btt deeper than tndtadual approaches.
slncc t h r former 1s rooted In the fundamental understanding of
what 11 means to be a human bctng (nor just an emplo!ee) w t h all
Conscious and unronsnous rrsponses to stressful sltuatlons.
Organtsar~onal approaches are thus, h~ghl! indlvldual approaches.
just adrn~nistered coilect~vel!.
Though them are many studies In which, in one way or
another. the researcher has dealt w t h role s tresses cxpcnenced
11.1
by profeauonals of various organimations, only a few such studies
have been discussed here which compared various h u e s
pertaining to role stress with regard to public and private sector
professionals.
Jasmme (1987) conducted a study to compare the level of
job-related smss among public and private sector blue-collar
employees. A job stress scale developed by the author was
admln~stered to a sample of 120 blue-collar workers from public
and 120 from pnvate sector organizations. The analysis of the
data revealed that role ~ncumbents of publ~c sector organization
experienced slgn~ficantly mom stress than those of pnvate sector
organuatlons
Twv stud~es which dealt wth publ~c and pnvate sector
profeas~onals were conducted by Pestonjee and Smgh (1987) and
C P Smgh (1987). Both mveshgatlons stud~ed computer
professtonals. The former study dealt wth two job categones,
namely. system analysts and managen, of both pubhc and pnvate
oqanrzottons whereas m the latter study. S~ngh stud~ed three job
categones, namely managers. systems, personnel and operations
pcrwnnel of both types of organufahons.
I I S
Another 8tudy war conducted by Shanma (1987)gn two job
categories, namely, rnangera and aupernsors of both public and
pnvate pharmaceutical organizations to ascertain the effects and
roles of mot~vational cl~rnatca on four psycholopcal variables such
a aa job satisfaction, participation, d e n a t i o n and rok stresses.
The findings of the study revealed that employees of the
pnvate organuatlon scored h~gher and significantly differed from
chow or publ~c organuatlon a s regards inner-role distance, role
expecrarlon conflict, role eroston. role ~solat~on, personal
tnadcquacy and rcsourcc ~nadcquacg. Publlc organvation
emplo\ces, howcvrr, scored s~gn~ficantl! hlgher on role
stagnattons
Ahmad. Bharadwaj and Naruai (1985) conducted a study of
stvss among cxrrutlvrs A group of 30 excrutrvcs from the public
sector and another group of 30 executives from the pnvate sector
were comparcd on role sntss. It was found that there was no
major dtfference.
b u r . n d Munhy (1986) conducted a study- with the
intention of examining the nature of role stress, coping strategies
and locus of control of managerial personnel a t M e r e n t
orgmuational level In a major public sector industrial organization
and to investigate and relationsh~p amongst these variables.
h t t anayak (1993) exarnlned the level of stress expenenced
bv 240 employees of a n industry a pubi~c sector undertak~ng m
Onssa Results revealed that supervisors expenenced greater job
stress. lack of leadersh~p support, the lnequlty than executives
Emplo\ees of the product~on unlt expenenced greater job stress.
role conillct, role arnb~gu~t). , role overload, job difficulr\, lack of
lcadershtp support, tnequttv inadequacy of role authonn than
s e m c e employees
Satyannra\ana ( 1995) ~nvestlgated smsaors among 7 5
executives and .75 supervisors of Bharat Heavy Elecmcal
Ltd.(BHEL) The analysis of the data revealed that role erosion.
personable msdequacy. resource Inadequacy and role stagnation
were e x p e n e n d a s dommate conmbutors of mle stress in
executive supemmora. The two groups Mered ypllficantly in
117
respect of inta-role distance, role overload, personal inadequacy
and role ambiguity dimensions.
M ~ s h r a (1997) conducted a study to compare the lwel of
occupational s t ress among pubhc and pnvate sector public
relations omcers The analys~s of the data revealed that pubhc
relations o m c e n of publlc sector expenenced slgnlficantly higher
occupat~onal s t ress on the dlmenslons of role ambiguity, role
confllcr, unrtasonablr group and SIC ~mpovenshment, low status
and s trrnuous worklng condlt~ons a s compared ro publrc relations
oflicers of pnvatc sector
Ahmad. Bharadwaj and Narula (1985) conducted a study on
rtrclrs and found that publtc sector executives expenence slightly
morr stress than their counterparts in the pnvate sector.
Beckground fac ton hkr ag?, educat~on. Income expenence and
rnamal s ta tus of execurlws were unrelated to role stress In both
the g r o u p .
Smgh'a (1986) a p l o r a t o q study related to structure and
-c. of s m s a among executive of public and pnvate sector
118
organizations. Some of the results of h ~ s study revealed t6at hlgher
level executives expenenced less stress and stram, utllutd better
copmg strategter and enjoyed more positlve outcomes. Also
execunves of pu bhcs sector organuatlons expenenced less e f f m v e
coplng s trateees and rated themselves a s less effective than theu
counterparts from the pnvate sector. The results also revealed
than suc dunenstons of stress, namely, lack of group cohesiveness,
feekng of inequtty, lack of supemsory support, role amhguity. job
requuement capab~l~ ty mlsmatch and Inadequacy of role authority
had a ncgatlve hnear rclationsh~p whlle role conflrct and role
a m b i g u ~ n had an ~nvened u-shaped relauonsh~p w t h
performance
Pestonejec and Slngh's (1987) stud? revealed that managers
and s \s tems anallsts In pnvate organuations have more stress
and satlsfact~on when compared w t h theu counterparts m pubbc
o r g a n w n o n
Sen (1981) in hta study investigated the mam role stresses
erpenenced by employees in banks a t d f l e n n t levels and the
coping auategies adopted by them.
Uatng the ORS Scale (Reek, 1983c,) Sen observed httle
dtflerence between the scores m the three banks but he found
mterestlng data about d~flerence stn role stresses a t the
organrzattonal levels. Top level people obtiuned lower scores on
role stagnattons whereas clericals staff;abtamed the htghest score
on thts d~menstons Sen. has tnterval staff obtatned the highest
score on thts d tmens~ons Sen has lntcrpretcd thls by obsemng
that people at the lowest level felt that thev were stagnattng both
~ndtvlduall\ as well a s role-wse However, this feelmg decreased
a s people moved up In the hterarchv
Chaudhan (1990) exarntncd the mlattonshtp between role
srress and job sattsfact~on among bank oflicers. The main findlngs
of the stud! were a s follows
(a) Roic rroston and rrsource lnadquac!. were expcnenced as
dominant whereas role amb~gutv and role expectatton
confltct a s remote contnbutors of role smss among bank
offtcers.
(b) No significant drffemnces were oburvtd between the two age
groups on role stress dunenstons.
(c) The overall indices of role stress and job oatisfact& were
found to be negatively correlated in higher as well as lower
age groups of bank officers.
Another study related to bank professionals was conducted
by Pattanayak and Mishra (1997). The main objective was to
explore spcc~fically prevalence and determinants of organitatienal
climate, job stress and job strain among the employees in the
s e m c e Kctors. The study revealed that significant differences
were observed between banlung and Insurance employees with
regard to role confl~ct and experience of Inequity.
Mukherjee ( 1997) studled the relatronsh~p between
organlutlonal role stress, role efficacy, and organlzatlonal climate
among banking profess~onals. The sample consisted of 71
managers which ~ncluded 27 senior level and 44 juntor level
management personnel or a large banhng organuauon. They
concluded that. Juntor level managers expenenctd hlgher stress
on all the role stress dmens lons a s c o r n p a d to senlor level
managera. Stgruf~cant differences were observed knwten the two
groups on the dunensions of inter-role &stance. role overload.
p rmond inadequacy and total role stress.
The study by Anrta and Carolyn (1995). tested the effects of
vanou. demographic a n d soclo-economlc varinbk on perceived
stress among bank managers in both work and aon-work
enwonment , and established significant correlations between
perceived stress in the work and non-work enwonment among the
same bank managers.
I r la evldent from the above dlscuss~on that like Western
researchers lndran scholars also d~fferentl\ approached the
problem of stress The\ wewed thls phenomenon from vanous
prrspccrl\rs ranglng from s t~mulus orlented to response and
ps \chod\n .~m~c polnrs of vlru Anc~ent l n d ~ a n scholars, however.
scrm to h ~ v e plci due attenuon to thls lssue The slstcm of Yoga
IS sna l \ t~ca l and nor on]\ helps the mdlwdual In understanding
hls o\m strrsses but also leads hlrn to the roots of these stresses
There are subtle vanatlons m the lntensln u ~ t h which d~flemnt
strcsaors operate and ~t la not unltkely that the powerful strcsaors
become less or even dormant after a penod of tune whereas the
Ins ponrrful ones rnav d l sappar or return w t h greater vlgour
I??
Bhatnagar, D. and Bose, K . Organizational role stress and branch
managers prajnan, 14(4), 1985, 349-360.
Boottner. W . B 'A Short rating scale of a potential measure of type - a
bchaviour Journal of chronic D~seascs. 22. 87-9 1 , 1969.
Chaudhary, A 'A study of relationship between job satisfaction and
role stress of bank officers. L'npublished b1.A. Dissertation,
Department of Psychology, University of Rajasthan, J a p u r ,
1990.
Chonko. Lau~ence Bernand. An Investigation of the Effects of various
sources of Rolr conflict and Role amblquirl; on the performance
Cold\vcll. D A Rolr confl~c-t. J o b sntlsfact~on and s~tuational anxiety In
bl,\ck intiustri,il workers The use of a dialect~cal method In an
empirical research study Psvchological .Abstracts. 1984, 71(11.
2693
Cummlngs and Elsalmi T h e Impact of Role Diversity, job level and
organltatlonal s u e on managerial satisfact~on. Administrative
Science. Quarterly 1-10. 1968.
Dabrowska, Helena, conll~cts and ambiguity of professional role
psychologcal abstracts. 1981, 6321, 4268.
Das. G.S. 'Organ~satlonal Determinants of ANuety based Management
Stress', v~kalpa, 7 (31, 1982, pp. 217-222.
Abdel-Halim,.A.A. (198 1) 'Employees Affective responses to
organizational stressl Moderating e k t s of job characteristic".
Personnel psychology. (Revised edition], 198 1.
Ahmad, S. and Khanna, P Job stress and Job satisfaction of middle
level hotel employees. Journal of Personality and clinical studies,
8 (1-2), 1992, 51-56.
M a d , S., Bharadwaj, A. and Narula, S. 'A study of stress among
executives*, Journal of personality and clinical studies, 1985,
1(2), pp. 47-50.
Ahmad, S.. Bhatt , D and Ahmad, H , Stress and coping strategies
among execubve technocrats, unpublished manuscript, 1990.
Alan Richardson and Meryl Stanton, Role Strain among Sales - Girls
m a Department Store. Human Reiabons 26 (4). 517 - 536.
Batlivala. S. Stress your Friend or foe? Bombay : Wagle process studio
and Ress Pvt. Ltd., 1990.
Beena, C. and Poduval. P.R. Gender dlnerences in work stress of
execucrves psychological studies, 37(2-3), 199 1. 109 - 113.
Berger - Gross Victoria and Krant. Allen I Great Expectations : A no
conllict explanation of Role conflict Journal of Applied
P s ~ c ~ o ~ o ~ , 1984, 69(2), 26 1-27 1.
Bemardin l ' h e Managerial grid as a predictor of conflict resolution
method and m a n a g d effectiveness, administrative science
quarterly, 198 1, vol. 2 1 (revised edition).
Daved C. Ganster and others, Human beahviouf at work :
organizational behaviour, 7m edition, New York, Mc Graw - Hill, 1986.
Dhadda. N. (1990). A shldy of the relationship of role stress, job
involrement and personality types in aviation and railway
officials. Unpublished M.M dissertation, University of
Rajasthan, Jaipur, 1990.
Effendioglu, alw Mustafa. The effects of performance Feedback on
performance, Locus of control, Role conhct and role ambiguity :
A field study, D~ssertation abstracts International, 1979, 39(11),
6853 A.
Efkndioglu, Bernadi. The managenal grid as a predictor of conllict
resoluuon method and managerla1 efTectiveness, Adrmrustrative
science quarterly, 198 1, vol. 2 1. (revised edition).
Francis, Role con5ct and Role Arnbiguty in Research and
development organizations. Dissertation Abstracts international.
1969, 301 11, 94.
Graham Job stress in Mississippi cooperative extension service
country personnel as related to age, gender, district. Tenure,
Position and, perceived leaduship khaviour of Immediate
Supervisiers. Dissertation Abstract International, 1983, 43(7)
2180-A.
Grapam. Prances Craf. Job stress in Mississippi cooperative extension
service countiy personnel as related to age, Gender, District
Tenure, Position and Perceived leadership Behaviour of
Immediate supervisors. Dissertation Abstracts International,
1983, 43 (7).
Greene, Idenrdication Modes of Rofessionals relationship with
formalization Role strain and Alienation. Psychological Abstracts
63(2), 1980, 4307.
Hans Selye, The stress of Ue New York Mc. Graw Hill book Company,
1936.
Harigopal. K.11980) 'Role Street variables, company, satisfaction and
job Involvement; personahty factors of moderation 'Managerial
psychology, 1, 1980, pp. 13-25.
Hrirsev and Blanchand Management of organizational Behaviour :
Udsing human resources. Englewood cMs, New Jersey :
Prcntlce Hall. Inc., 1972, 1977.
Helen Whltlen 'Usmg rmnd maps for stress management', Stress
News, Jan 1997, Vol. 9, No. 1 Internet Source.
House. RiEto and Ltrtzmen Role conflux and ambiguity as critical
variables m a model of orgamzaaonal behaviour, organizational
behaviour and human performance. 1970. '7' 467-505.
House, RLeo Role conflict and Ambiguity a s critical variables in a
model of organiEationai behaviour. Orgamsational Behaviour
and Human Performance Y', 1970.467-505.
Jagaish, and Srivastara, A.K. Perceived Role Stress and Job
Satisfaction. Psychological Abstracts, 1984, 71 (lo), 27447.
Jagdish, An investigation into the relationship of Perceived
Occupational Stress with Job Satisfaction and Mental Health of
First Level Supervisors. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Banaras
Hindu University, Varanasi. 1983.
Jasmine, R A comparative smdy of private and public sector blue - collar employees on job related stress. Unpublished M.Phil
dissertat~on, Calicut University, Calicut. 1987.
Jennifer Smith -0rganisatlonal Stress and Employee well beeing : New
Persptcbves" Stress News, Vol. 10, No. 2 Internet Source, April
1998.
liagan. Norman . I . Kagan. Hanya, 'Stress reduction m work place :
The effcctlveness of psycho educabonal programs*, Journal of
counselmg psychology, Jan. 1995, Vol. 42, Issue 1.
Kaur. G , and Mcrrhy. V . N . organizational role stress, coptng strategies
and locus of control m a major public sector industrd
organization. Unpublished manuscript, 1986.
Keller, R.T., 'Role conIlict and Ambiguity, Comlates with Job
Satisfacbon values', Personnel Psychology, 1975, 28,l,pp. 57-
64.
Kumar, S 'A swdy of Role Stress, Role Satisfaction and Role efficacy
among public Sector Executives'. Ph.D. Thesis, M.D. University.
Rohtak, 1989.
Lodahi. T.M. & liejner, M , (19651. The definition and measurement of
job involrement. Journal of applied psychology, 1965, 49. 24-
23.
Madhu, li and Harigopal, K. Role conflict and Role Ambiguity in
relation to job involvement, job performance, age and job
rennue. Indian Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 17(1], 1-6.
Madhu, K, and Har~gopal, ).;. Role confl~ct and role ambiguity in
rclat~on to job ~nsolvemcnr, Job performance, age and job
Renure. lndlan Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 17 (1) 1-6
(revised edltlon).
M~chacls, Ronald Eldrldge. An ernblrlcal study of Rok Stress
Perceptions and Behavlours of Purchasing proless~onals
Dlssertatlon Abstracts International. 1983. 44(12). 3791-A.
(Rcvlsed Edltlonl
5llsrn. 51 Asscrt~\.c.nrss and role stress In pollce officers.
L'npubllshed M A. dlssertatlons Department of psychology.
Lucknow U n ~ v e r s ~ e Lucknow. 1997.
Mittal L' Copy~ng styles of related to role stress. locus of control and
personality. tvpe unpublished Ph.d. thesis, L'niverslty of
Rajastna. J a p u r , 1992.
Mohamed Tnlo Perception of Role s m by outs~de Salesmen.
Dlasertatlon Abstracts tnternahonal (revised ediuon), 1978.
34(51. 2 106 - A.
Morris, Influence of organizational Commitment, job involvement and
psychosomatic Illness among three vocational groupings.
Psychological Abstracts, 1980,64(2).
Mom% James H., and Shyder, Robert A. A second Look at need for
achievement and need for autonomy as moderators of role
perception outcome relationship. Qschological Abstracts, 1980,
64(4).
Mukharjee, D. Study of role stress and role efficacy in elation to
organization resuvcturing : The case of SBI unpublished MBA
dissertation, Indm Gandhi National Open University, New Delhl.
1997.
Orpen, c. (1963). Cognitive failure as a moderator of the effect of work
stress on personal strain; an empirical study. Psychologicas
stud~es, 41 (1-21, 50-52. (Revised edition), 1963.
Pandey, A. Role Stress and role efficacy. In D.M. Pestonjee and U .
Pareek (Eds.) Studies in Organisational role stress and coping.
Jaipur / New D e h : Rawat Publiscations, 1997.
Parasumman Coping Behamours and Manager's effective Reactions to
role smsa as psychologtcal abstracts, 1984 71(8).
Parasurraman and rUluto Sources and out comes of s t m s in
Organuational Sellings : Toward the development of a structural
Model. Psychological Abstracts, 14 (Revised Editions) 7 1(10),
1981.
Pareek, U., organizational role stress. In L.D. goodstein and J.W.
pfeiffer (Eds.), The 1983 annual for facilitators, trainers, and
consultants (pp. 115- 118). San Diego, California University
associates, 1983c.
Patnayak life in organizations, New D e h / Allahabad, A.H. Wheeler
and Co., 1993.
Postonjee, D.M. and Singh, G.P. 'organizational behaviour Issues for
managers and systems analysis". Workmg paper No:66O, Indmn
institute of Managements, Ahmadabad. (Revised Edition), 1987.
Qwck .D. 'Organisational Stress and Preventive Management"
MCCROA HILL, New York. 1974 pp. 8-9.
R w . J.R. House, R. J. and Litzman, S.I. "Role confeict and Ambiguity
in complex organisatlon", Administrative Sclence Quarterly, 15,
1970, pp. 150-63.
Robert Holder 'A Dose of Laughter Medicine', Stress News, Vol. 10.
No. 2. lnterenet Source, April 1998.
Satyanarayana. K. Stressors among executives and supervisors : A
comparative study in a public sector undertaking osmania
Journal of psychology, 1995. 19, 1-9.
Schuller R.S. 'DeGrution and concepruatizanon of stress in
oqmmtion', orgaruzational Behaviour and Human
Performance, 1980.
Schuller. R.S. 'Role perceptions, satisfaction and performance A
partial reconciliation" Journal of Applied psychology, 1975, 60,
pp. 683-87.
Sen, P.C. 'A study of personal and organizational correlated of Role
Stress and coping strategies in some public sector Banks' Ph.D.
thesis, Gujarat Unviersity, Ahmedabad, 1981.
Shailendra Singh and h i n d K. Sinha 'Emphirical Dimensions of
Strategies of Coping with job Related Stress', Indian Journal of
Applied Psychology, 1984, Vol. 24 ( l ) , pp. 25-29.
Sharma, T. Dtfferentd effects of organizational climates on job
satisficauon, sense of partic~pation, alienation and role stress.
Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad,
1987.
Singh. G.P., Organ~saoonal climate as moderator of role stress - job
satisfact~on relat~onsh~p in case of different, Job categories of
computer profess~onals unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Gujarat
University, Ahmedabad, 1987.
Singh, S. 'Execu~ves under stress : Explorations in the structure and
Dynam~cs', Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of
Technology, lianpur, 1983.
Srivastara, A.K. and Sinha, M.M. Pcrceivd Role Stress of a function of
Ego strength and Job involvement of the Managerial personnel.
Psycholog~cal Abstracts, 1984, 7 1 (6).
Srivastara, P.K, and Sinha, M.M 'Perceived Role Stress as a function of
Ego strength and Job Involvement of Managerial Personnes",
Psychological Studies, 28, 1983, pp/ 8 - 12.
Srivastava, A.K. Job Anxiety Scale Varanasi : Deepa Publications,
1974.
Srivastava, A.K., 'Moderating effect of N. Ach. on Role Stress Job
Anxiety Relationship", Psychological Studies, 1985, 30 (2), 102-
106.
Srivastava, P.K. and Sinha, M . M . 'Perceived Role Stress as a function
of Ego strength and Job involvement of managerla1 personnel",
psycholog~cal studies, 1983, 28, pp. 8- 12.
Sr~vastava, P.K., and Parmar K.H. Relationship of Role Conflict, role
ambiguity and role accuracy to job satisfact~on. Psychological
abstracts. 1983. 66 (3). 6861.
Stephcn Palmer 'Problem focused Stress counseling and stress
management ualnlng - An ~ntr~ns~call!. br~ef integration
approach - Put I' Stress News. .4pr1l 1977, Vol. 9 , No 2 Internet
source.
Wesley Sirne, *h'e\' Concepts m Stress Management'. Stress News, Vol.
10. No. 2. Internet Source. April 1998.
Wittkamper, Duane Kent, orgn~stlonal communication processes and
job stress. Disserttion abstracts interna~onal, 1984, 45 (4), 620
- A.