Upload
ami-dalton
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Organ and Tissue Donation – 2013 and
Beyond
Teresa Shafer, RN, MSN, CPTC
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Presentation Overview
• Sketch of Types of Donation – Frame up our System
• Controversial Metrics
• Donor Potential
• Questions
Organ Donation System and Process
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Currently…
• Types of donation• Organ – Heart, Lung, Liver, Pancreas, Kidney,
Intestine• Tissue – Bone, Ligaments, Tendons, Saphenous
Veins, Heart Valves, Skin• Corneas/Eyes
• Types of donors• Brain-dead, heart-beating• Non-heart-beating (Donation after Cardiac Death,
DCD)• Living, related or unrelated
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Pathways to Donation
BRAIN DEATH Patient maintained on
ventilator, heart beating Potential organ & tissue
donor Tissue recovery follows
organ donation
DCD Family initiates
withdrawal of care Patient likely to arrest
within 60 minutes of extubation
CARDIAC DEATH Patient has no cardiac
or respiratory activity. Potential tissue donor Body must be kept cool
before tissues are recovered.
Recovery is within 24 hours of death
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Currently…
• Roughly 28,500 organs transplanted yearly in U.S. (22,000 from deceased donors, 6,500 from living donors)
• Approximately 750,000 tissues transplanted yearly in U.S.
• Approximately 45,000 corneas transplanted yearly in U.S.
Current Challenges
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Major Challenges
• Limited supply of brain dead organ donors (estimated 12,000 nationally per year)
• Demand for transplants growing faster than supply of organs
• Early deceleration of care, DNI, DNR, improved trauma care, etc shrinking number of potential brain dead organ donors
• Aging population means more “extended criteria” organs
Click to edit Master subtitle style
National Health Crisis
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
Living DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving DonorsLiving Donors
Waiting recipients Transplants Living DonorsCadaveric Donors
Transplanted Pa-tients
Waiting ListORGAN SHORTAGE!
DeceasedDonors
LivingDonors
Click to edit Master subtitle style
108,000 People Waiting - 150% of the average NFL Stadium
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Overall donation rates (per 100 eligible deaths), by DSA
HRSA SRTR. http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2011/ The SRTR is administered by the Chronic Disease Research Group of the Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, with oversight and funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration.
CY 2011
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Organs transplanted per donor (OTPD), by DSA
CY 2011
HRSA SRTR. http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2011/ The SRTR is administered by the Chronic Disease Research Group of the Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, with oversight and funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration.
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Variation in the use of ECD donors in 2011, by DSA
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Variation in the use of DCD donors in 2011, by DSA
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Variation in Waiting Time (months)for Deceased Transplant, 2011
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Variation in Waiting Time (months)Heart and Lungs, 2011
Every Organ Every Time…….Where is the Case for OPO Volume?
And what happens to OTPD, if we do make that case?
Teresa Shafer, RN, MSN, CPTC
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Single Organ Donors –a match for a single recipient….
• The decision as to whether or not to recover a single organ from a single donor should not be driven by its effect on OPO OTPD.
• The decision as to whether or not to recover a single organ from a single donor should not be driven by financial consideration.
Click to edit Master subtitle style
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000Organ Donors
flat
Organ Donors2003-2011
24% increase in organ donors, 2003 – 20071% increase in organ donors from 2007 - 2010
DHHS. OPTN. Collaborative Scorecard. Data for Period: September 2009 – August 2010. https:www.healthcarecommunities.org
Click to edit Master subtitle style
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009200,000,000
220,000,000
240,000,000
260,000,000
280,000,000
300,000,000
320,000,000Population
US Population2003-2010
6% increase in population, 2003 – 2009
http://www.census.gov/popest/states/NST-ann-est.html
Click to edit Master subtitle style
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000Reported Eligibles
20% DECREASE in Reported Eligible Donors
Reported Eligible Donors2003-2011
DHHS. OPTN. Collaborative Scorecard. Data for Period: September 2009 – August 2010. https:www.healthcarecommunities.org
Click to edit Master subtitle style
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Conversion Rate
52% INCREASE in Conversion Rate
Conversion Rate2003-2011
DHHS. OPTN. Collaborative Scorecard. Data for Period: September 2009 – August 2010. https:www.healthcarecommunities.org
Click to edit Master subtitle style
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100
5
10
15
20
25
30Donors per Million
Donors per Million2003-2010
25% increase in d.p.m., 2003 – 2010
Donor Data from: DHHS. OPTN. Collaborative Scorecard. Data for Period: September 2009 – August 2010. https:www.healthcarecommunities.orgPopulation data from www.aopo.org. AOPO Documents>AOPO Monthly Profile Survey Data
Click to edit Master subtitle style
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0
5
10
15
20
25
30Organ Donors and Donors per Million
Donors donor per million
Donors & donors per million2003-2010
24% increase in organ donors25% increase in donors per million
Donors per M
illion
Organ D
onors
DHHS. OPTN. Collaborative Scorecard. Data for Period: September 2009 – August 2010. https:www.healthcarecommunities.org
Click to edit Master subtitle style
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Eligibles and Conversion Rate
Eligibles Conversion Rate
52% INCREASE in Conversion Rate20% DECREASE in Eligibles
Decreasing Eligibles and Increasing Conversion Rate
Eligible D
onors
Conversion
Rate
DHHS. OPTN. Collaborative Scorecard. Data for Period: September 2009 – August 2010. https:www.healthcarecommunities.org
Click to edit Master subtitle style
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%Organ Donors and Conversion Rate
Donors Conversion Rate
Donors & Conversion Rate2003-2011
25% increase in organ donors52% increase in conversion rate
Conversion R
ate
Organ D
onors
DHHS. OPTN. Collaborative Scorecard. Data for Period: September 2009 – August 2010. https:www.healthcarecommunities.org
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Decreasing OTPD with donor volume (measured in dpm)
15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.02.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.4
Donors per Million
OTPDLinear (OTPD)
OT
PD
DHHS. OPTN. Collaborative Scorecard. Data for Period: September 2009 – August 2010. https:www.healthcarecommunities.org
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Eligible Donors do not represent the donor pool
• Conversion rate with reported eligibles as denominator are not reliable inter-OPO (between OPOs) performance comparison metric.
• Conversion rate intra-OPO (within OPO) are useful to that OPO to observe current conversion rate against historical conversion rates, given that the OPO did not change its own definitions or measurement strategies.
• Reported Eligibles do not represent the U.S. donor pool, but we behave as if they do……• While there are other problems with the eligible
definition, the first step in the wrong direction was excluding donors from the pool who were not officially pronounced dead…..
Click to edit Master subtitle style
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%Organ Donors and Conversion Rate
Donors Conversion Rate
An Unsustainable Trend & a need for Renewed Focus
25% increase in organ donors52% increase in conversion rate
Conversion R
ate
Organ D
onors
This is the trend that is not sustainable,- for our patients or for our credibility…….. We can’t transplant conversion rate, we can only transplant organs, and sadly, a volume metric is missing from the CMS Outcome Measures.You get more of what you measure…….and there is no volume metric in the CMS outcome measures…….
LifeGiftMetrics
Jan – July, 2013
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Conversion Rate & PotentialJan – July, 2013 compared to 2012
2012 20130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
193 155
51 62
Donors No Authorization
Conversion Rate of 71.4% in 2013, compared to a conversion rate of 79% in 2012.
Applying same conversion rate to 2013 potential would yield 17 donors – 16 more donors for 2013.
Conversion Rate: 9.6% decrease
Donor Potential: 11% decrease
79%71.4%
Click to edit Master subtitle style
AA Consent Rate; African American Donors
West North Southeast TOTAL0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
50%45%
65%59%
85%
66%71%
20122013
1 811 1523 34 24
January – June 2013
No AA potential donors in 2012
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Hispanic Consent Rate;Hispanic Donors
West North Southeast TOTAL0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
60%
73%
81%77%
50%
60% 60%57%
20122013
3 311 1826 40 243
January – June 2013
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Caucasian Consent Rate; Caucasian Donors
West North Southeast TOTAL0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
100%
80%
88% 86%
100%
81%88% 86%
20122013
6 2632 3526 92 679
January – June 2013
Click to edit Master subtitle style
OPO Productivity – VOLUMETotal Organ Donors
PADV
CADN
TXGC
MIO
PTXSB
NCNC
MW
OB
FLWC
MO
MA
AZOB
INO
PFLU
F
NJTO
FLMP
CORS
OHLB
PRLL
ALOB
NVLV
OHLP
KYDA
WID
N
NCCM
CAGS
TNMS
NYAP
NEOR
OHO
V
CTOP
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500 Organ Donors
STA
LifeGift
Oklahoma
TOSA
DTCP Monthly UNOS data reports; most recent time period for Collaborative Scorecard through April as of July, 2013
Click to edit Master subtitle style
OPO Productivity – VOLUMETotal Organs Transplanted
CAOP
CADN
TXGC
MIO
P
TNDS
MAO
B
NCNC
MNO
PIN
OP
WALC
LAO
P
WIU
WVATB
NJTO
CORS
TXSA
OHLB
UTOP
OHLP
NVLV
KYDA
NCCM
MSO
P
TNMS
IAO
P
NEOR
NYFL
OHO
VHIO
P
500
1000
1500 Organs Transplanted
STA
LifeGift
Oklahoma
TOSA
DTCP Monthly UNOS data reports; most recent time period for Collaborative Scorecard through April as of July, 2013
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Percent of Donors - SCD
TXSA
ORUO
TXSB
KYDA
MSO
P
FLMP
GALL
NYAP
LAO
PFLF
H
OHLP
PRLL
AROR
MDPC
ILIP
OHLB
FLUF
MNO
P
NYRT
MO
MA
NVLVHIO
P
NCNCVATB
MIO
P
NYWN
NMO
P
PADV
NEOR
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
STALifeGift
Oklahoma
TOSA
Philadelphia
DTCP Monthly UNOS data reports; most recent time period for Collaborative Scorecard through April as of July, 2013
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Percent of Donors - DCD
NJTO
MW
OB
WIU
W
NCNC
NMO
P
CORS
NYFL
PATFFLF
H
AZOB
WALC
VATB
OHLB
FLUF
OHO
V
FLWC
OKO
PIL
IP
ORUO
TXGC
CAOP
CADNALO
B
AROR
NVLV
TNMS
GALL
MSO
P
SCOP
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0 Percent of Donors - DCD
STA
LifeGift
Oklahoma
TOSA
New England
DTCP Monthly UNOS data reports; most recent time period for Collaborative Scorecard through April as of July, 2013
Click to edit Master subtitle style
OPPORTUNITY COST
There is opportunity cost but there is great potential in recovering non-traditional donors.
Everyone should have the opportunity to donate.
Every withdrawal of life support and ventilatory support should be evaluated and given the opportunity to donate. Presumptive – presume death will occur in time frame suitable for donation.
POTENTIAL – NON TRADITIONAL DONORS
Click to edit Master subtitle style
TOP 24 Hospitals 2009 - 2012
Me
mo
ria
l HE
RM
AN
N ..
.
VA
ND
ER
BIL
T U
NIV
ER
...
AS
EM
CA
RO
LIN
AS
ME
DIC
A...
UP
MC
HE
AL
TH
SY
ST
...
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
OF
MA
R...
FA
IRF
AX
HO
SP
Un
ive
rsity
of M
issi
ssip
pi..
.
HA
RB
OR
VIE
W M
ED
IC...
CH
RIS
TIA
NA
CA
RE
H...
Ind
ian
a U
niv
ers
ity H
ea
l...
JOH
N P
ET
ER
SM
ITH
...
ER
LA
NG
ER
ME
DIC
AL
...
SH
AN
DS
AT
UF
OR
HS
-OR
LA
ND
O R
EG
...
UN
IV O
F T
N M
ED
CE
N...
UA
B H
OS
PIT
AL
/UA
B ..
.
SP
EC
TR
UM
HE
AL
TH
...
AL
LE
GH
EN
Y G
EN
ER
A...
WA
KE
ME
D
UW
HC
Co
mm
un
ity R
eg
ion
al M
e...
Wa
ke F
ore
st B
ap
tist M
ed
...
TE
XA
S H
EA
LT
H F
OR
...
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
287
237 231205
192171
152 149136 136 134 131 130 129 127 126 124 120 119 119 119 118 116 116
TOTAL DONORS
Based on OPTN Data as of May 24, 2013
Of approximately 6000 acute care hospitals in US, 2265 had atleast one organ donor during this period.
Click to edit Master subtitle style
TOP 21 Hospitals - DCD 2009 - 2012
VA
ND
ER
BIL
T
UN
IV O
F W
IS
FA
IRF
AX
HO
SP
HA
RB
OR
VIE
W M
E...
Un
iv P
A P
RE
SB
Y P
itt...
SH
AN
DS
-U
F
BU
TT
ER
WO
RT
H -
Mic
...
Wa
ke F
ore
st -
NC
Me
mo
ria
l HE
RM
AN
N
Fro
ed
tert
Lu
the
ran
WI
UM
AS
S
UN
IV M
AR
YL
AN
D
MA
SS
GE
NE
RA
L
CA
RO
LIN
AS
ME
DC
TR
UN
IV M
ICH
IGA
N
Via
Ch
rist
i - S
t. F
ran
cis,
...
UN
IV H
OS
P -
NJ
RH
OD
E IS
LA
ND
HO
S...
OR
LA
ND
O M
ED
CT
R
UN
IV O
F P
A P
HIL
LY
JOH
N P
ET
ER
SM
ITH
...
05
101520253035404550 46
4340 40 38
35 33 33 33 33 3229 29 29 28 27 27 27 26 26 25
Based on OPTN Data as of May 24, 2013
DCD Donors
Click to edit Master subtitle style
DCD Donors – LifeGift Hospitals2009 - 2012
Me
mo
ria
l HE
RM
AN
N...
JOH
N P
ET
ER
SM
ITH
...
TE
XA
S H
EA
LT
H F
O...
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
ME
DIC
...
Co
ok
Ch
ildre
n's
Me
dic
a...
KIN
GW
OO
D M
ED
ICA
...
TE
XA
S C
HIL
DR
EN
S...
ME
MO
RIA
L H
ER
MA
...
Me
tho
dis
t Ho
spita
l
CO
VE
NA
NT
ME
DIC
AL
...
TE
XA
S H
EA
LT
H A
R...
NO
RT
H H
ILL
S M
ED
I...
Me
mo
ria
l He
rma
nn
No
rt...
ME
MO
RIA
L H
ER
MA
N...
BA
YL
OR
ME
D C
TR
A...
HO
US
TO
N N
OR
TH
WE
...
Pla
za M
ed
ica
l Ce
nte
r
Me
dic
al C
en
ter
of A
rlin
...
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35 33
25
15
8 85 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Based on OPTN Data as of May 24, 2013
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Top Pediatric Hospitals2009 - 2012
ME
M. H
ER
MA
NN
...
PR
IMA
RY
CH
ILD
R...
CH
ILD
RE
NS
MC
-...
VA
ND
ER
BIL
T -
N...
CH
ILD
RE
N'S
ME
R...
TE
XA
S C
HIL
DR
EN
...
CO
OK
CH
ILD
RE
N'..
.
LO
MA
LIN
DA
MC
...
CH
ILD
RE
N'S
- A
T...
UN
IV O
F M
ISS
ISS
...
LE
BO
NH
EU
R C
HI..
.
OU
MC
- O
KL
A...
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
8068
5850 49 48 45 43
39 39 37 37 35
575 Hospitals
had atleast 1 Pediatric Donor in 2009 – 2012.
These are the
nation’s largest
Pediatric Organ Donor
Hospitals
Based on OPTN Data as of May 24, 2013
Pediatric Donors
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Top Pediatric Hospitals - DCD 2009 - 2012
PR
IMA
RY
CH
ILD
RE
NS
...
CH
ILD
RE
N'S
ME
RC
Y -
...
UN
IV V
A H
OS
P &
CH
I...
CO
OK
CH
ILD
RE
N'S
-...
ST
. LO
UIS
CH
ILD
RE
NS
CH
ILD
RE
NS
- C
OL
O...
CH
ILD
RE
NS
H O
F A
L...
CH
ILD
RE
NS
- P
ITT
S...
CH
ILD
RE
NS
- P
HIL
AD
...
TE
XA
S C
HIL
DR
EN
S -
...
PH
OE
NIX
CH
ILD
RE
NS
RA
DY
CH
ILD
RE
NS
- S
...
0
5
10
15
20
2521
16 16
8 8 7 6 6 6 5 5 5
Pediatric DCD Donors
Based on OPTN Data as of May 24, 2013
OPTN Deceased Donor Potential Study:
Background, Early Findings and Commentary
Click to edit Master subtitle style
DDPS Research Team
NAME & ORGANIZATIONAL AFFILIATIONFUNCTIONAL ROLE ON TEAM
Karl J. McCleary, PhD, MPH (UNOS CTSE & VCU) Principal Investigator
Gary B. Hirsch, MS (MIT) Co-Principal Investigator
L. Ebony Boulware, MD, MPH Co-Investigator
Leah B. Edwards, PhD (UNOS Research) Co-Investigator
Gary King, PhD, MA (Harvard) Co-Investigator
Kevin A. Myer, MSHA (UNOS CTSE) Co-Investigator
Michael Reibel, PhD (Cal Poly) Co-Investigator
John D. Rosendale, MS (UNOS Research) Co-Investigator
Khalid Saeed, PhD, M. Eng. (WPI) Co-Investigator
Laura A. Siminoff, PhD, MA (VCU) Co-Investigator
Samuel Soret, PhD, MPH (Loma Linda U) Co-Investigator
Kirstina Wile, MS (Systems Thinking Collaborative) Facilitator
Joyce DK Essien, MD, MBA (Emory; CDC; Retired) Facilitator
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Future Directions
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Percentage of Population > 18Registered Donors in Texas
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2006-2008
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
23.5%
17%
12%
7%
2%
1%
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Where do we stand?
Room for improvement…and gaining quickly
Registrants > 18 y/o
TX 4,479,800 19,073,564 23.5%
FL 7,348,607 15,315,088 47.9%
CA 10,499,913 28,801,211 36.5%
NY 3,320,000* 15,307,107 21.5%
Click to edit Master subtitle styleState DD
CA 9,954,273
FL 7,075,534
IL 5,257,313
OH 5,213,582
PA 4,484,705
GA 4,419,720
NC 4,347,096
WA 4,161,910
VA 3,615,938
TX 3,612,525
State DD
IN 3,448,333
NY 3,179,754
MO 3,109,700
MI 3,088,837
MA 2,690,667
CO 2,650,000
WI 2,557,891
MN 2,541,433
MD 2,403,255
NJ 2,379,141
To 10th and climbing quickly…Total Donor Designations, as of 3/31/13
*Estimated
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Future Directions
• Increased number of donors coming from “first person consent” or registries
• Increased consent/conversion• Increased success utilizing older donor
organs• Increased utilization of “donation after
cardiac death” donors
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Questions?
1. What are the different types of donors that can donate vascular organs for transplantation?
2. Approximately how many organ donors are recovered each year in the U.S.?
3. What are Hispanic and African American Authorization Rates in the LifeGift community?
4. Does registration on the Texas Donate Life Registry constitute a valid and binding donation authorization?
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Questions?
Question 1:What are the different types of donors that can donatevascular organs for transplantation?
1. Brain dead donors2. DCD (Donation after Cardiac Death)3. Living Donors4. All the above
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Questions?
Question 2Approximately how many organ donors are recoveredeach year in the U.S.?
1. 5,0002. 8,0003. 10,0004. 15,000
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Questions?
Question 3What are Hispanic and African American Authorization Rates in the LifeGift community?
1. 50 – 60% Hispanic and African American Living Donors2. 20 – 30% Hispanic and African American Living Donors3. 10 – 20% Hispanic and African American Living Donors4. 70 – 80% Hispanic and African American Living Donors
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Questions?
Question 4Does registration on the Texas Donate Life Registry constitute a valid and binding donation authorization?
1. No2. Yes3. Maybe4. Unknown
THE END