Upload
brian-grimmett
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order of HB155
1/3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE STATE OF UTAH; and GARY R.
HERBERT, Governor of the State of Utah, in
his official capacity,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARYRESTRAINING ORDER
Case No. 2:13CV332
Judge David Nuffer
This matter comes before the Court on the United States Motion for Temporary
Restraining Order and for a Preliminary Injunction, in which Plaintiff asks the Court to enjoin the
enforcement of Sections 53-13-106.5 and 76-8-512(4) of the Utah Code. The Court recognizes
that Plaintiff has provided notice to Defendants of this motion, and that Defendants have
stipulated to the entry of this order in a telephone conference held this day. Having considered
the motion and supporting documentation filed by the United States, the Court rules as follows:
The United States argues in its motion that Sections 53-13-106.5 and 76-8-512(4) are
preempted and unconstitutional. This argument is supported with legal authorities and there is a
likelihood of success on the merits. The United States claims that it will suffer irreparable injury
Case 2:13-cv-00332-DN Document 9 Filed 05/13/13 Page 1 of 3
7/30/2019 Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order of HB155
2/3
if the amendments in Utah House Bill (HB) 155 are permitted to take effect on May 14, 2013,
and support this argument by demonstrating that the enforcement of Sections 53-13-106.5 and
76-8-512(4) will immediately and irreparably (i) disrupt the constitutional order by undermining
the federal governments control over federal lands, (ii) risk the safety of the public and of
officers responsible for the enforcement of law on those lands, and (iii) undermine the
governments ability to protect federal lands and the persons, property, and natural resources
located thereon. The United States contends that the balance of hardships tips strongly in its
favor, and that a temporary restraining order advances the public interest and supports these
assertions. These are the preliminary conclusions of the court in support of this Temporary
Restraining Order and will be revisited entirely at a later date.
In order to allow all parties the opportunity to fully present to the Court their positions,
the Defendants have agreed to the immediate entry of a temporary restraining order and to the
schedule ordered below.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff United States motion for a temporary restraining order is GRANTED.
2. The Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and
those persons in active concert or participation with them are HEREBY ENJOINED AND
RESTRAINED from giving any effect to or otherwise taking action to enforce Sections 53-13-
106.5 and 76-8-512(4) of the Utah Code.
3. This order shall become effectively immediately and by consent of the parties shall
continue in effect unless and until the Court lifts this order.
2
Case 2:13-cv-00332-DN Document 9 Filed 05/13/13 Page 2 of 3
7/30/2019 Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order of HB155
3/3
4. Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction will be considered on the following
schedule:
a. Defendants response memorandum shall be filed by May 28, 2013.
b. Plaintiffs reply memorandum shall be filed by June 7, 2013.
c. The Court will hear oral arguments on this motion on June 28, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
in Room 230, Frank E. Moss United States Courthouse, 350 South Main Street,
Salt Lake City, Utah. The Court will accept testimony by declaration; no live
witnesses will be permitted except by the courts request or on motion by a party
filed no later than that partys scheduled memorandum.
Issued on May 13, 2013, at 2:50 p.m.
__________________________________
DAVID NUFFERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Case 2:13-cv-00332-DN Document 9 Filed 05/13/13 Page 3 of 3