Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order of HB155

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order of HB155

    1/3

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

    THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

    Plaintiff,

    v.

    THE STATE OF UTAH; and GARY R.

    HERBERT, Governor of the State of Utah, in

    his official capacity,

    Defendants.

    ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARYRESTRAINING ORDER

    Case No. 2:13CV332

    Judge David Nuffer

    This matter comes before the Court on the United States Motion for Temporary

    Restraining Order and for a Preliminary Injunction, in which Plaintiff asks the Court to enjoin the

    enforcement of Sections 53-13-106.5 and 76-8-512(4) of the Utah Code. The Court recognizes

    that Plaintiff has provided notice to Defendants of this motion, and that Defendants have

    stipulated to the entry of this order in a telephone conference held this day. Having considered

    the motion and supporting documentation filed by the United States, the Court rules as follows:

    The United States argues in its motion that Sections 53-13-106.5 and 76-8-512(4) are

    preempted and unconstitutional. This argument is supported with legal authorities and there is a

    likelihood of success on the merits. The United States claims that it will suffer irreparable injury

    Case 2:13-cv-00332-DN Document 9 Filed 05/13/13 Page 1 of 3

  • 7/30/2019 Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order of HB155

    2/3

    if the amendments in Utah House Bill (HB) 155 are permitted to take effect on May 14, 2013,

    and support this argument by demonstrating that the enforcement of Sections 53-13-106.5 and

    76-8-512(4) will immediately and irreparably (i) disrupt the constitutional order by undermining

    the federal governments control over federal lands, (ii) risk the safety of the public and of

    officers responsible for the enforcement of law on those lands, and (iii) undermine the

    governments ability to protect federal lands and the persons, property, and natural resources

    located thereon. The United States contends that the balance of hardships tips strongly in its

    favor, and that a temporary restraining order advances the public interest and supports these

    assertions. These are the preliminary conclusions of the court in support of this Temporary

    Restraining Order and will be revisited entirely at a later date.

    In order to allow all parties the opportunity to fully present to the Court their positions,

    the Defendants have agreed to the immediate entry of a temporary restraining order and to the

    schedule ordered below.

    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

    1. Plaintiff United States motion for a temporary restraining order is GRANTED.

    2. The Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and

    those persons in active concert or participation with them are HEREBY ENJOINED AND

    RESTRAINED from giving any effect to or otherwise taking action to enforce Sections 53-13-

    106.5 and 76-8-512(4) of the Utah Code.

    3. This order shall become effectively immediately and by consent of the parties shall

    continue in effect unless and until the Court lifts this order.

    2

    Case 2:13-cv-00332-DN Document 9 Filed 05/13/13 Page 2 of 3

  • 7/30/2019 Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order of HB155

    3/3

    4. Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction will be considered on the following

    schedule:

    a. Defendants response memorandum shall be filed by May 28, 2013.

    b. Plaintiffs reply memorandum shall be filed by June 7, 2013.

    c. The Court will hear oral arguments on this motion on June 28, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.

    in Room 230, Frank E. Moss United States Courthouse, 350 South Main Street,

    Salt Lake City, Utah. The Court will accept testimony by declaration; no live

    witnesses will be permitted except by the courts request or on motion by a party

    filed no later than that partys scheduled memorandum.

    Issued on May 13, 2013, at 2:50 p.m.

    __________________________________

    DAVID NUFFERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

    3

    Case 2:13-cv-00332-DN Document 9 Filed 05/13/13 Page 3 of 3