14
Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005

Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

  • View
    215

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites

(based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002)

Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites

(based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002)

Nick Cowan

UW Astronomy

February 2005

Nick Cowan

UW Astronomy

February 2005

Page 2: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Dramatis PersonaeDramatis Personae

Globular Clusters1. Red Horizontal

Branch (RHB)2. Blue Horizontal

Branch and Metal Poor (BHP+MP)

Dwarf Satellite Galaxies (DSG)

Globular Clusters1. Red Horizontal

Branch (RHB)2. Blue Horizontal

Branch and Metal Poor (BHP+MP)

Dwarf Satellite Galaxies (DSG)

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 3: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Galactic Formation SchemesGalactic Formation Schemes

Bottom-Up• Small-scale (GCs,

DSGs) form first.• Small pieces

coalesce into a galaxy.

Bottom-Up• Small-scale (GCs,

DSGs) form first.• Small pieces

coalesce into a galaxy.

Top-Down• Galaxy forms first• GCs and DSGs form

in the context of a large galaxy.

Top-Down• Galaxy forms first• GCs and DSGs form

in the context of a large galaxy.

Page 4: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Pole AnalysisPole Analysis

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 5: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Orbits will not be perfectly correlated:Orbits will not be

perfectly correlated:• Even in a spherical potential, tidal

forces will degrade orbits.• Potential is probably not spherical so we

expect precession of orbits.• Clumpy dark matter will scatter

satellites.• A time-dependant potential will scatter

satellites.

• Even in a spherical potential, tidal forces will degrade orbits.

• Potential is probably not spherical so we expect precession of orbits.

• Clumpy dark matter will scatter satellites.

• A time-dependant potential will scatter satellites.

Page 6: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Great Circle Pole Families Great Circle Pole Families

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 7: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Crossing Points of Great CirclesCrossing Points of Great Circles

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 8: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Correlation Function and [Fe/H]Correlation Function and [Fe/H]

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

RHB and DSG

BHB/MP and DSG

Page 9: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Correlation Function and RgcCorrelation Function and Rgc

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Rgc > 25 kpc

8 < Rgc < 25 kpc

Page 10: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Arc Segment Family AnalysisArc Segment Family Analysis

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 11: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Determining Arc Segment FamiliesDetermining Arc Segment Families

1. Find the two nearest arc segments.

2. Lump them together.3. Find the next-nearest

arc segments.4. Lump them together.5. etc.6. Stop when you stop

believing.

1. Find the two nearest arc segments.

2. Lump them together.3. Find the next-nearest

arc segments.4. Lump them together.5. etc.6. Stop when you stop

believing.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 12: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

How far is too far?How far is too far?

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

“I’m getting nervous, let’s stop here.”

Page 13: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

Reality CheckReality Check

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 14: Orbital Poles of Milky Way Satellites (based on Palma, Majewski and Johnston 2002) Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy February

ConclusionsConclusions

• BHB+MP GCs do not appear to track DSGs in their orbits around the MW.

• Some RHB GCs have correlated orbits.• Orbital Pole Analysis is a powerful tool

but better proper motion measurements will be needed to put more meaningful constraints on Galaxy formation schemes.

• BHB+MP GCs do not appear to track DSGs in their orbits around the MW.

• Some RHB GCs have correlated orbits.• Orbital Pole Analysis is a powerful tool

but better proper motion measurements will be needed to put more meaningful constraints on Galaxy formation schemes.