34
Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Strategies for High-Yielding Spring Wheat in Manitoba Amy Mangin & Don Flaten, University of Manitoba John Heard, Manitoba Agriculture

Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Strategies for ...€¦ · Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Strategies for High-Yielding ... • Foliar applied urea solution resulted

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Strategies for High-Yielding Spring Wheat in

Manitoba

Amy Mangin & Don Flaten, University of Manitoba

John Heard, Manitoba Agriculture

Challenges to our traditional N fertilization management

• Current provincial guidelines do not address the high yield potential of current varieties that may exceed 90 bu/ac

• When high yields are achieved, risk of inadequate protein content for milling market is substantial

• The existing recommendation of 2-3 lbs. N/bu spring wheat target yield creates large financial, agronomic and environmental risks

• Midseason fertilization may mitigate these risks but there is very little research for Manitoba growing conditions

Project Objectives

1. Determine appropriate N rates, based on realistic yield and protein goals for new high-yielding varieties

2. Determine the most effective and efficient combination of N timing, rate, and source to meet yield and protein potential

3. Evaluate innovative soil tests for predicting mineralizable nitrogen during the growing season

4. Develop decision tools for midseason and post-harvest evaluation of N sufficiency for yield and protein potential

Methods

• Field trials conducted across MB over the 2016-2017 field seasons (8 site-years)

• Intensive agronomic management to maximize yields

• Factorial Design (Variety X N Treatment) arranged as a RCBD

VarietyN Rate (lbs N/ac) Source Timing/Placement

Spring In Season Spring In Season Spring In Season

Brandon (CWRS)

andProsper (CNHR)

0

ConventionalUrea

Midrow band at seeding

50

80

110

140

170

200

80ESN:Urea

(40:40)

140ESN:Urea (100:40)

80 30

ConventionalUrea

Agrotain treated urea

Stem elongation, broadcast

80 60

80 30 Flag leaf, broadcast80 60

80 30 UAN Post anthesis,

foliar80 30 Urea Sol'n

Treatments

RATE

SOURCE

TIMING

50 lbs N/ac 100 bu/ac

140 lbs N/ac 112 bu/ac

0 lbs N/ac 67 bu/ac

200 lbs N/ac 129 bu/ac

Prosper

Brunkild, MBJuly 2017

Variety

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Brandon ProsperP

rote

in (

%)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Brandon Prosper

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

Variety: Silver Level Sites

• Prosper yield 4.2 – 16.3 bu/ac more than Brandon across Site-years

• Brandon had 0.7 – 1.3 % increased protein content than Prosper across Site-years

Yield Protein

0

20

40

60

80

100

Brandon Prosper

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Brandon ProsperP

rote

in (

%)

Variety: Gold Level Sites

• Prosper yield 7.8 – 15.4 bu/ac more than Brandon across Site-years

• Brandon had 1.3 – 2.0 % increased protein content than Prosper across Site-years

Yield Protein

Nitrogen Rate

Melita 2016

0

20

40

60

80

0 50 80 110 140 170

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

AA AAB

BCC

6789

10111213141516

0 50 80 110 140 170

Pro

tein

(%

)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

c

ab

c bcab a

Residual NO3-N: 43 lbs/ac

Yields adjusted to13.5% moisture

*Profitability based on Jan 5, 2018 pricing

Carberry 2016

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 50 80 110 140 170

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

lbs N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

BA A A A A

6789

10111213141516

0 50 80 110 140 170

Pro

tein

(%

)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

b ab aba a a

Residual NO3-N: 89 lbs/ac

Yields adjusted to13.5% moisture

Melita 2017

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 50 80 110 140 170

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

AABABBC

C

D

6789

10111213141516

0 50 80 110 140 170

Pro

tein

(%

)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

aba a

bcc

Residual NO3-N: 11 lbs/ac

Yields adjusted to13.5% moisture

Grosse Isle 2017

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 50 80 110 140 170

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

AAAABBC

C

6789

10111213141516

0 50 80 110 140 170

Pro

tein

(%

)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

bab

a

c

d d

Residual NO3-N: 65 lbs/ac

Yields adjusted to13.5% moisture

Site-yearSpring NO3-N (0-60 cm)

Economic Optimum N

Rate*

Yield at Economic

Optimum N Rate

Nitrogen Supply per

bushel

lbs. N/ac lbs. N/ac bu/ac lbs. N/bu

Melita 2016 43 80 60 2.1

Carberry 2016 89 50 95 1.5

Melita 2017 11 140 74 2.0

Grosse Isle 2017 65 110 75 2.3

N Rate: Silver Level Sites

Range of soil test N + Fertilizer N per bushel:

1.5 – 2.3 lbs N/bu

*Wheat prices from Jan 5, 2018, Nitrogen prices based off 5-years AVG urea price ($0.43/lbs N)

Carman 2016

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 50 80 110 140 170 200

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

CD

AB ABC

BCD

A

D

6789

10111213141516

0 50 80 110 140 170 200

Pro

tein

(%

)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

d cd bcd bcab ab a

Residual NO3-N: 47 lbs/ac

Yields adjusted to13.5% moisture

Brunkild 2016

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 50 80 110 140 170 200

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

D

E

CD

ABC A AB AB

6789

10111213141516

0 50 80 110 140 170 200

Pro

tein

(%

)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

aabbcbc

cddd

Residual NO3-N: 40 lbs/ac

Yields adjusted to13.5% moisture

Carman 2017

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 50 80 110 140 170 200

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

B

A A A A A A

6789

10111213141516

0 50 80 110 140 170 200

Pro

tein

(%

)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

ede

cdbc ab

ab a

Residual NO3-N: 43 lbs/ac

Yields adjusted to13.5% moisture

Brunkild 2017

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0 50 80 110 140 170 200

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

AABABCAB

BCC

D

6

8

10

12

14

16

0 50 80 110 140 170 200

Pro

tein

(%

)

lbs. N/ac

Brandon

Prosper

d

aabab

bcd

d

Residual NO3-N: 43 lbs/ac

Yields adjusted to13.5% moisture

N Rate: Gold Level Sites

Average soil test N + Fertilizer N per bushel:

1.7 – 3.0 lbs N/bu *Wheat prices from Jan 5, 2018, Nitrogen prices based off 5-years AVG urea price ($0.43/lbs N)

Site-yearSpring NO3-N (0-60 cm)

Economic Optimum N

Rate*

Yield at Economic

Optimum N Rate

Nitrogen Supply per

bushel

lbs. N/ac lbs. N/ac bu/ac lbs. N/bu

Carman 2016 47 140 62 3.0

Brunkild 2016 40 140 75 2.4

Carman 2017 43 140 96 1.9

Brunkild 2017 43 140 110 1.7

Nitrogen Timing

Silver Sites:

In Season Splits

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

Planting Stem Elongation Split Flag Leaf Split

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

110 Lbs N/ac

140 lbs N/ac

A A A

11

11.5

12

12.5

13

13.5

14

14.5

15

Planting Stem Elongation Split Flag Leaf Split

Pro

tein

(%

)

110 Lbs N/ac

140 lbs N/ac

b ba

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Planting Stem ElongationSplit

Flag Leaf Split

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

110 Lbs N/ac

140 lbs N/ac

BA AB

11

11.5

12

12.5

13

13.5

14

14.5

15

Planting Stem Elongation Split Flag Leaf Split

Pro

tein

(%

)

110 Lbs N/ac

140 lbs N/acc

b

a

Gold Sites:

In Season Splits

50

60

70

80

90

100

80 lbs N/ac 80 + 30 PA lbs N/ac 110 lbs N/acY

ield

(b

u/a

c)

**

6

8

10

12

14

16

80 lbs N/ac 80 + 30 PA lbs N/ac 110 lbs N/ac

Pro

tein

(%

) **

Silver Sites:

Post- Anthesis Application

50

60

70

80

90

100

80 lbs N/ac 80 + 30 PA lbs N/ac 110 lbs N/ac

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

6

8

10

12

14

16

80 lbs N/ac 80 + 30 PA lbs N/ac 110 lbs N/ac

Pro

tein

(%

) **

*

Gold Sites:

Post- Anthesis Application

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

May

5 2

01

6

May

8 2

01

6

May

11

20

16

May

14

20

16

May

17

20

16

May

20

20

16

May

23

20

16

May

26

20

16

May

29

20

16

Jun

1 2

01

6

Jun

4 2

01

6

Jun

7 2

01

6

Jun

10

20

16

Jun

13

20

16

Jun

16

20

16

Jun

19

20

16

Jun

22

20

16

Jun

25

20

16

Jun

28

20

16

Jul 1

20

16

Jul 4

20

16

Jul 7

20

16

Jul 1

0 2

01

6

Jul 1

3 2

01

6

Jul 1

6 2

01

6

Jul 1

9 2

01

6

Jul 2

2 2

01

6

Jul 2

5 2

01

6

Jul 2

8 2

01

6

Jul 3

1 2

01

6

Au

g 3

20

16

Au

g 6

20

16

Au

g 9

20

16

Au

g 1

2 2

01

6

Au

g 1

5 2

01

6

Au

g 1

8 2

01

6

Au

g 2

1 2

01

6

Au

g 2

4 2

01

6

Au

g 2

7 2

01

6

Pre

cip

itat

ion

(m

m)

Brunkild 2016

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

May

5 2

01

7

May

8 2

01

7

May

11

20

17

May

14

20

17

May

17

20

17

May

20

20

17

May

23

20

17

May

26

20

17

May

29

20

17

Jun

1 2

01

7

Jun

4 2

01

7

Jun

7 2

01

7

Jun

10

20

17

Jun

13

20

17

Jun

16

20

17

Jun

19

20

17

Jun

22

20

17

Jun

25

20

17

Jun

28

20

17

Jul 1

20

17

Jul 4

20

17

Jul 7

20

17

Jul 1

0 2

01

7

Jul 1

3 2

01

7

Jul 1

6 2

01

7

Jul 1

9 2

01

7

Jul 2

2 2

01

7

Jul 2

5 2

01

7

Jul 2

8 2

01

7

Jul 3

1 2

01

7

Au

g 3

20

17

Au

g 6

20

17

Au

g 9

20

17

Au

g 1

2 2

01

7

Au

g 1

5 2

01

7

Au

g 1

8 2

01

7

Au

g 2

1 2

01

7

Au

g 2

4 2

01

7

Pre

cip

itat

ion

(m

m)

Brunkild 2017

Accumulated Rainfall:

275 mm

Accumulated Rainfall:

150 mm

Gro

win

g Se

aso

n P

reci

pit

atio

n

In Season N Applications

Nitrogen Sources

Post-Anthesis – Gold Sites

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

UAN Urea Sol'n

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

UAN Urea Sol'nP

rote

in (

%)

Carman 2017 Brunkild 2017

Yield Protein

ESN Blends – Gold Sites

50

60

70

80

90

100

Urea ESN Blend

Yie

ld (

bu

/ac)

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

Urea ESN Blend

Pro

tein

(%

)

Yield Protein

Preliminary Conclusions

• Total N supply (soil test nitrate-N + fert) required for economic optimum ranged from:➢ Silver Sites: 1.5 – 2.3 lbs N/bu➢ Gold Sites: 1.7 – 3.0 lbs N/bu

• Stem elongation and flag leaf split applications yielded at least as well as applications at planting

• Flag leaf split applications increased grain protein content compared to equivalent rates at planting and stem elongation splits.

• Post-anthesis applications increased grain protein content

• Foliar applied urea solution resulted in higher yield and grain protein content compared to UAN

• ESN blends produced yield and protein content similar to conventional urea

Additional Project Data

• Soil tests for N mineralization from SOM during growing season

• In season soil and tissue sampling

• GreenSeeker and SPAD Meter relationships to yield and protein

• N Uptake and Removal

• Post-harvest Soil N as an indicator of N sufficiency

Stay posted for full project report!

Acknowledgments

• Manitoba Wheat and Barley Growers Association

• John Heard and colleagues in Manitoba Agriculture

• Crop Diversification Centres (WADO, CMCDC)

• U of M Ian Morrison Research Station at Carman

• David Laudin • Antara Agronomy• Koch Fertilizer• Agrium • AGVISE Laboratories• Angie, Magda, Lanny, Megan, Trevor,

Thomas, Saad, Rockford, Meghan, Joel

Amy ManginDept. Soil ScienceUniversity of [email protected](204) 384-1196