Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Gery
Optimization of the Step Roll-Over
with a Population of
Low Activity Level Amputees
Bonnet X., De La Torre M., Bouchard C., Deboissy F., Mille J
PROTEOR, Dijon, France
Gery
Context : Factors influencing the mobility of lower limb amputees
Davies et Datta, Prosthet Orthot Int 2003
Correlation between mobility level and various factors (Harold Wood
Stanmore mobility grade)
For 357 lower limb amputees (average age : 68 years) [16-95]
Population with prosthetic follow-up
Mobility factors
Age
Amputation level
Amputation cause
Gery
Walking Speed Evolution
Bohannon, Age and Ageing 1997
Toburn 1995, Barth 1992, Casillas 1995, Jones 1994, Lemaire 1993,
Hermodsson 1994, Hsu 2006, Postema 1997, Pwers 1996,
Schmatlz 2002, Snyder 1995, Underwood 2004
Valid people
Traumatic
origin
Vascular
origin
Age (years)
Walk
ing s
peed (
m/s
)
Gery
Step Roll-Over
Adapted from C.W. Radcliffe 1962
Gery
Optimization of the Step Roll-Over
with a Low Activity Level Patient
To improve the leg segment position compared to the plumb-line
To decrease pressures during forefoot weight bearing
S A C H
Gery
Material and methods
Measurement study
4 patients : 3 TT, 1 TF
Pressure in the socket (4 areas)
Step roll-over :
• Length of the first and terminal parts of the step
• Evolution of the angle between the leg segment and the plumb-line
Repeated AB-BA measurements
Satisfaction survey
15 patients, average age 72.5 years [54-90],
10 TT, 5 TF (lock knee)
ESAT (QUEST 2)
Gery
Patient Selection
L1 Activity Level
TT TF
Other knee
Locking knee
Age > 65 years
Age < 65 years
First prosthesis
< 6 months
First prosthesis
> 6 months
Other foot
Gery
Results : Pressure in the Socket
C2
C3 C1 C4
Max
pre
ssu
re (
Kp
a/K
g)
Max
pre
ssu
re (
Kp
a/K
g)
Gery
Results : Kinematics
S A C H Terminal part of the step
Leg segment angle
OHS = opposite heel strike
Gery
QUEST Results
Technical items :
Dimension
Weight
Adjustment
Safety
Sturdiness
Ease of use
Comfort
Efficiency
Gery
QUEST Results
Items considered as the most important by the patients of this survey :
Safety
Comfort
Weight
Safety Comfort Weight
Not satisfied
Little satisfied
More or less satisfied
Rather satisfied
Very satisfied
Gery
Discussion
Pressure in the socket
Values of the same order than those of the litterature
Decrease at the level of the patellar tendon
Length of the terminal part of the step
Varies too much to demonstrate an influence of the step length
(under these conditions)
Better evolution of the leg segment angle during the unilateral body
weight support
Satisfaction
Safety
Comfort
Weight
Gery
Conclusion
GERY foot advantages
Step roll-over (leg segment motion)
Comfort (pressure in the socket)
Lightweight
Population of patients with L1 activily level, especially
Trans-femoral patients with locking knee
Patients with a walking frame
Prospects
To continue the study with a larger population
Gery
Many thanks for your attention