Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg)Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Optimization of micronutrient supplement forenhancing biogas production from food waste intwo‑phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion
Menon, Ajay; Wang, Jing‑Yuan; Giannis, Apostolos
2016
Menon, A., Wang, J.‑Y., & Giannis, A. (2017). Optimization of micronutrient supplement forenhancing biogas production from food waste in two‑phase thermophilic anaerobicdigestion. Waste Management, 59, 465‑475.
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80484
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.017
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. This is the author created version of a work that has been peerreviewed and accepted for publication by Waste Management, Elsevier Ltd. It incorporatesreferee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such ascopyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The publishedversion is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.017].
Downloaded on 28 Nov 2021 12:17:37 SGT
1IntroductionFoodwaste (FW) isoneof the largest componentsofmunicipal solidwaste (MSW) inmostdevelopedcountries.Approximately36.4and89million tonnesofFWaregeneratedannually inUSAandEU,
respectively(USEPA,2012;EU,2010).IndevelopingcountriessuchasChina,FWformsupto50%ofthetotalMSWanditisexpectedtoincreasedrasticallyinthefuture(Daietal.,2013).Ineffectivemanagementof
FW can causemany environmental issues such as hygiene and odour problems, greenhouse gas emissions, pollution, and loss of resources, etc. (Zhang et al., 2014). Food waste composition is highly variable
dependingonthesourcewithcharacteristichighmoisturecontentof74–90%,VS/TSratioof80–97%,andC/Nratioof14.7–36.4(MillerandClesceri,2003).ThismakesFWeasilybiodegradableandgoodsourcefor
renewableenergyproductionthroughbioconversion.Consideringenergysecurity,worldhungerandenvironmentalimpacts,itwouldbemoreaccuratetocallFWamisplacedresourceratherthanwaste.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a promising approach for the bioconversion of FW into biogaswith relatively low energy consumption, space requirement and cost (Speece, 1983). The twomain groups of
microorganisms(acidogensandmethanogens)involvedinADdifferwidelyintheirnutritionalneeds,growthkineticsandenvironmentalrequirements.Anyimbalanceamongthemcouldcauseprocessfailure(Demirel
andYenigün,2002).Inparticular,ADsufferswitheasilybiodegradablesubstratelikeFWduetoenhancementofacidogenicstage(Wardetal.,2008).Thescarcityofessentialmicronutrients,thepresenceofinhibitory
agentssuchaslongchainfattyacids(LCFA)andtheexcessofammoniaaresomeotherfactorsthatcouldfurtherlimitADprocess(Chenetal.,2008).
PhaseseparationcanimprovetheADprocessthroughoptimizationoftheacidogenicand/orthemethanogenicstages(Jiangetal.,2012).Thetwo-phaseADprocessmitigatesimbalanceandoverloading,while
higherorganic loadingrates(OLRs)orbiogasproductivitycouldbeachieved(Shenetal.,2013).ThermophilicAD(carriedoutat50–60°C) isanotheroperationmode to increasebiogasproductivity.Thehigher
temperaturesimprovehydrolysisandphysicaldegradationofthesubstrate,increasedestructionoforganicmatterandenhancemethaneyields(Kim,2004).
Recently, there has been a spotlight on the role of certain trace metals or micronutrients in AD process. The micronutrients play significant role in several metabolic pathways in AD, however, their
concentrationisusuallyinadequatetoaffectthem(Schattaueretal.,2011;Zhangetal.,2007).Micronutrientsofparticularinterestarecobaltnickel,iron,magnesiumandcalcium.Thesemicronutrientsareessential
Optimizationofmicronutrientsupplementforenhancingbiogasproductionfromfoodwasteintwo-phasethermophilicanaerobicdigestion
AjayMenon
Jing-Yuan Wang
ApostolosGiannis⁎
ResiduesandResourceReclamationCentre(R3C),NanyangEnvironmentandWaterResearchInstitute,NanyangTechnologicalUniversity,1CleantechLoop,CleanTechOne,Singapore637141,Singapore
⁎Correspondingauthor.
Abstract
Theaimofthisstudywastoenhancethebiogasproductivityoftwo-phasethermophilicanaerobicdigestion(AD)usingfoodwaste(FW)astheprimarysubstrate.Theinfluenceofaddingfourtrace
metals(Ca,Mg,Co,andNi)asmicronutrientsupplementinthemethanogenicphaseofthethermophilicsystemwasinvestigated.Initially,ResponseSurfaceMethodology(RSM)wasappliedtodeterminethe
optimalconcentrationofmicronutrientsinbatchexperiments.Theresultsshowedthatoptimalconcentrationsof303,777,7and3mg/LofCa,Mg,CoandNi,respectively,increasedthebiogasproductivity
asmuchas50%andsignificantlyreducedtheprocessingtime.Theformulatedsupplementwastestedincontinuoustwo-phasethermophilicADsystemwithregardtoprocessstabilityandproductivity.Itwas
foundthatadestabilizedthermophilicADprocessencounteringhighVFAaccumulationrecoveredinlessthantwoweeks,whilethebiogasproductionwasimprovedby40%yielding0.46LCH4/gVSadded/day.
TherewasalsoamajorincreaseinsolubleCODutilizationupontheadditionofmicronutrientsupplement.TheresultsofthisstudyindicatethatamicronutrientsupplementcontainingCa,Mg,CoandNi
couldprobablyremedyanytypeofthermophilicADprocess.
Keywords:Micronutrients;ThermophilicAD;Responsesurfacemethodology;Biogas
foravarietyofchemical,biochemicalandmicrobiologicalreactionsrelatedtoVFAutilization,methanegenerationandcelllysis.Cobaltandnickelformapartofcarbonmonoxidedehydrogenase(CODH),whichplays
anessentialroleinmethanogenesisfromacetate(Madiganetal.,20 15;Zandvoortetal.,2006).NickelisalsofoundinthecofactorcoenzymeF430(TakashimaandSpeece,1990),whichplaysanimportantrolein
autotrophicmethanogenesis. Iron is part of cytochromes and ferredoxin inmethylotrophicmethanogens, and as iron-sulphur proteins in some enzymes (Takashima and Speece, 1990).Magnesium is known to
stimulatetheproductionofsinglecells(SchmidtandAhring,1993),whicharerequiredforavoidingthelossofaceticlasticactivityinanaerobicreactors.CalciumcanaddresstheproblemofoveracidificationinAD
duetolongchainfattyacidinhibitionbyforminginsolublesaltswithLCFAs(Kleybockeretal.,2012).
Themicronutrientsoperateatthemetaboliclevel,andtheirrequirementisindependentofsourceofthesubstrate.Assuch,micronutrientsupplementationhasbeenshowntobeimportantforstabilizingand
optimizingbiogasproductionfromfoodwaste(ZhangandJahng,2012;Weietal.,2014).WhilesomeresearchhasbeenconductedtoformulateamicronutrientsupplementforuseinAD,littlehasbeendonetowards
tailoringamicronutrientsupplementforenhancingthermophilicADoffoodwaste.
Usually,themicronutrientsupplementisexternallyaddedinADsystem(Facchinetal.,2013).However,itisimperativetodeterminetheoptimallevelsasoverdosecanleadtoexcesscostandeco-toxicity.
Responsesurfacemethodology(RSM),acollectionofmathematicalandstatisticaltechniquesthatcanbeusedforanalysingtheeffectsofsuchindependentvariablesandoptimizetheireffectonasingleresponse
(BoxandDraper,1987).RSMcanbeappliedinDesignofExperimentstoimproveprocessdesignandoptimizetheresponseoftwoormorevariablewithoutknowingtherelationshipbetweenthefactors.Theobjective
ofusingRSMistodeterminetheoptimaloperatingconditionsforthesystemtoachievearequiredoutput.Hence,RSMhasbeenusedtooptimizevariousfactorsinanaerobicdigestionsuchassubstratemixingratio,
feedingrate,C/Nratioandsubstratepretreatment(Kim,2004;Wangetal.,2012;Menonetal.,2015).
Inthisstudy,amicronutrientsupplementcontainingCa,Mg,Co,andNiwasformulatedtoimprovemethanegenerationintwo-phasethermophilicADsystemusingfoodwasteassubstrate.RSMwasinitially
appliedtooptimizetheconcentrationofCa,Mg,Co,andNiinbatchexperiments.TheefficiencyoftheformulatedsupplementwastestedincontinuousmodethermophilicADsystemconsideringprocessstabilityand
biogasyield.
2Materialsandmethods2.1Substrateandinoculum
Theprimary substratewasFWcollected fromacanteen inNanyangTechnologicalUniversity,Singapore. Itmostlyconsistedof leftoverscontaining rice,noodles, fruitpeels,boiledvegetables, cookedmeatandoil.Non-
biodegradablematerialssuchasbonesorplasticsweremanuallyseparated.Afterwards,theFWwasgrinded,andfilteredthroughafinewiresieve,creatingapastewithparticlessmallerthan1mmindiameterwhichwasthendiluted
withwatertotheconcentrationof3gVS/L.ThiswasusedasfeedstockintheacidogenicphaseofthermophilicADprocess.TheeffluentfromtheacidogenicphasewasusedassubstrateinthemethanogenicphaseofADwithoutany
pre-treatmentordilution.Table1presentsthemaincharacteristicsofFWandacidogeniceffluent.
Table1CharacteristicsoffoodwasteoriginalfeedstockandacidogenicADeffluent.
Parameter FW(3gVS/L) Acidogeniceffluent
pH 5.1 4.2
ORP(mV) −59 −388
TS(%) 3.2 2.1
VS/TS(%) 93.51 74.54
Acetate(mM) 1.22 40.17
Propionate(mM) 0.15 1.86
Butyrate(mM) 0.05 15.52
TVFAs(mM) 1.98 59.69
CODt(g/L) 33.55 28.26
03
CODs(g/L) 8.95 16.57
Ca(mg/L) 13.3 36.2
Co(mg/L) 2.27 0.84
Fe(mg/L) 51.79 16.25
Mg(mg/L) 15.8 5.18
Ni(mg/L) 14.18 n.d
n.d.–notdetected.
TheoriginalseedinoculumwasmesophilicADsludgethatobtainedfromUluPandanWaterReclamationPlant,Singapore.ItsconversiontothermophilicsludgewasdoneusingamethoddescribedbydelaRubiaetal.(2005)
withsomechanges.Briefly,a20LCSTRbioreactorwasoperatedwithorganicloadingrate(OLR)of0.5gVS/L/dayFWassubstrateandhydraulicretentiontime(HRT)of30daysforaperiodof2weeksatmesophilicconditions.The
temperaturewasthendirectlyraisedtothermophilicconditions(55°C)usingheating jacketandafteraperiodofstarvation for2days, thereactorwas fedwith0.5gglucose/L/day for2weeks,whileother conditions remained
unchanged.ThesubstratewasthenchangedtoFWwithanOLRof0.5gVS/L/day.Oncebiogasproductionandsoliddestructionwerestabilized,atwo-phasethermophilicADsystemwasadoptedwithanOLRof3gVS/L/day(more
detailsinSection2.3).Theeffluentfromthemethanogenicphasewascollectedandusedasinoculuminthebatchexperiments.
2.2MicronutrientsupplementTheconcentrationofmicronutrients(Ca,Mg,Co,andNi)wasmeasuredbythequantityofindividualcomponenttypicallyfoundinfoodwasteandtheactualrequirementinADprocess.Themaximumconcentrationswere
chosenbasedonextensiveliteraturereviewandpreliminaryexperiments.Assuch,themaximumconcentrationsusedwere500mg/LforCa,1000mg/LforMg(Loetal.,2010),10mg/LforCo(Pobeheimetal.,2010)and5mg/LforNi
(TakashimaandSpeece,1990).Alltracemetalswereaddedasdissolvedsalts(CaCl2·4H2O,MnCl2·4H2O,CoCl2·6H2O,NiCl2·6H2O)inthefeedforthemethanogenicphase.Inaddition,VisualMinteq,achemicalequilibriummodelwas
appliedtocalculatethemetalspeciationandsolubilityequilibria.
2.3ExperimentalsetupsTheoptimalconcentrationofmicronutrientsupplementwasdeterminedusingbiochemicalmethanepotential(BMP)tests.Thesubstratetoinoculumratio(SIR)wasmaintainedat0.3(basedonVS)(Angelidakietal.,2009).
TheBMPtestswereconductedintheAutomatedMethanePotentialTestingSystem(AMPTSII)(BioprocessControl,Sweden).AMPTSconsistedof15parallelreactorsof500mLcapacity(workingvolumeof400mL),andthesame
numberofgasflowmeterswasconnectedtotheacquisitionsystem.Thereactorsweresealedwithrubberstoppersandthenconnectedtomechanicalagitatorwhichstirredthesludgefor1minonandoffat80rpm.Thereactorswere
spargedwithnitrogengasbeforesealedtocreateanaerobicconditionsandincubatedat55°C.Thegasproducedwasmonitoredusingautomateddataloggingsystem.Threeseparaterunswerecarriedout–Run1:Ca-Mgmixture
(highconcentrationmetals);Run2:Co-Nimixture(lowconcentrationmetals);andRun3:optimizedmicronutrientsupplement.Run1and2wereconductedinduplicate,whileRun3intriplicate.Allexperimentslastedfor20days.
Theeffectoftheformulatedmicronutrientsupplementonmethaneproductionwasfurtherstudiedincontinuoustwo-phasethermophilicADsystemconsistingofa10Lreactor forhydrolysisandacidogenesis,anda20 L
reactor formethanogenisis (Winpact,USA).Thereactorsweremonitored forpH,ORPandbiogasproduction.Bothreactorsweremaintainedat55°Cusingheating jackets,while theHRTwas5and15days for acidogenic and
methanogenic phase, respectively. The feedstock in the acidogenic phase was FWwith OLR 3 g VS/L/day and pH 4.5± 0.3. The effluent from the acidogenic phase was the feedstock in the methanogenic phase. Before the
micronutrientsupplementation,thetwo-phaseADsystemwasatstableoperationfor6months,butatlaterstagethemethanogenicphaseexperiencedsomeVFAaccumulationandthemethaneproductiondropped.
2.4ResponseSurfaceMethodology(RSM)Acentralcompositedesignwithtwofactorswasusedtodesigntheexperimentsinthebatchstudies.MethaneproductionwaschosenastheresponsevariableandtheconcentrationsofCa,Mg,CoandNiwerechosenasthe
independentvariables.Thisdesignrequiredtheuseofthreelevelsoftheindividualvariables-alowerlimit(-(−1),anupperlimit(1)andthecentrepoint(0).Thelowerlimitwaschosen0mg/Lforeveryelementandtheupperlimit
waschosenbasedonliteraturereviewandpreliminaryexperimentsasexplainedinSection2.2.Hence,thethreeconcentrationsusedforeachmicronutrientwere:0,250and500mg/LforCa2+;0,500and1000mg/LforMg2+;0,5
and10mg/LforCo2+;and0,2.5and5mg/LforNi2+.Themicronutrientsweredividedintotwogroupsforevaluationonthebasisoftheirsimilarityandsynergisticeffect:Ca-Mg(similarchemicalcharacteristics,requiredinlarger
concentrations),andNi-Co(bothinvolvedinmethanogenesisandsubstrateutilization,requiredinlowerconcentrations).ThestatisticalanalysissoftwareMINITAB17(SBTI,SanMarcos,Texas)wasusedforthispurpose.
2.5AnalyticaltechniquesThe pH-readings in the batch experiments were conducted with a compact titrator (Mettler Toledo) equipped with a pH probe (Mettler Toledo DGi 115-SC). Total (CODt) and soluble (CODs) chemical oxygen demand
measurementsweremadeusingCODdigestionvials(Hach)andaspectrophotometerDR2800(Hach,USA)asperstandardmethods(APHA,1995).AmmoniawasmeasuredcolorimetricallyusingaDR2800spectrophotometer(Hach,
USA). The micronutrient content in the AD effluent was analysed using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS NexION 300D, Perkin Elmer). Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) content was measured using a gas
chromatograph (Agilent Technologies 7890A,USA), equippedwith a flame ionization detector (FID) (Agilent Technologies,USA). A selective capillary column (DB-FFAP)was applied for good separation of nine VFA compounds
includingacetic,propionic,iso-butyric,n-butyric,iso-valeric,n-valeric,iso-caproic,n-caproicandheptanoicacids.Agaschromatograph(AgilentTechnologies7890A,USA)equippedwithathermalconductivitydetector(TCD)was
usedtomeasurethemethane,hydrogenandcarbondioxidecontentinbiogas.TheC/NratioofFWwasdeterminedbymeasuringthetotalcarbonandnitrogenusinganelementalanalyzer(VarioELcubeCHNOS,Germany).
3Resultsanddiscussion3.1Micronutrientavailability
ThebioavailabilityofmicronutrientelementswasdeterminedusingtheVisualMinteqsoftware.TableS1showstheconcentrationofthespeciesusedtomodelthemetalspeciationanalysis.Normalmethanogenicconditionsof
pH=7,ORP=−500mVandammonia,carbonateandphosphatespecieswereused.Forthedeterminationofbioavailabilitythemaximumconcentrationoftracemetalswasused(Ca:500mg/L,Mg:1000mg/L,Co:10mg/L,Ni:
5mg/L).TableS2showstheresultsofthespeciationanalysisfortracemetalions.94%and91.6%ofaddedCaandMgwerepredictedtoremaininsolutionasCa2+andMg2+ions,respectively,while92%ofCowaspredictedtoremain
intheformofbioavailableCo2+ions.83.3%ofNi(addedinthesmallestamount)waspredictedtobeasNi2+ions,whileapproximately15%ofNiwaspredictedtoremaininsolubleammoniumandphosphatecomplexes.Therefore,all
tracemetalswouldbemostlyinbioavailableforms,andtheADsystemwouldnotsufferwithaccumulationofprecipitants(insolublecrystals)thatinhibitbiogasproductionandcausetoxiceffects.
3.2Optimizationofmicronutrientmixtures3.2.1Run1:Ca-Mgmixture
Fig.1presentstheeffectofCa-Mgmixtureonmethaneproduction.Itseemsthattheadditionofmicronutrientshadapositiveeffectinmethaneproduction.Morespecifically,theadditionofmicronutrientsnotonlyincreases
theproduction,butitacceleratedtheproductionratesaswell.ThissuggeststhatthetraceelementsCa-MgwereatsuboptimalconcentrationsintheADsystemandtheiradditionwasnecessaryforbetterprocessperformance.The
productionofmethanewasincreasedby30–60%atvariousdosagesofthemicronutrients,withthecombinationof250mg/LCa2+and500mg/LMg2+showingthehighestyield.
TheRSManalysisofCa-MgconcentrationsforoptimizedmethaneproductionisshowninFig.2intheformofthreedimensionalresponsesurfaceofthepredictedmethaneproduction.Theregressionequationusedforthe
modelwas:
Fig.S1showsthe2DsurfacegraphsforoptimizingCa-Mgconcentrationsformaximummethaneproduction.ThepredictedoptimalconcentrationsforCaandMgwere303and777mg/L,respectively,whichcouldtheoretically
produce2.3Lofmethaneina20daysbatchexperiment,leadingtoa75%increaseinproduction.
Table2showstheANOVAresultsfortheresponsesurfaceanalysisoftheadditionofCa-Mgmixtureforoptimizingmethaneproduction.Basedonthesignificantstrongrelationshipbetweenthemodelandtheresponsevariable
(p-value<0.005),thehighR-squaredandR-squared(predicted)valuesof93.31%and88.53%,respectively,andthesignifyingacceptablegoodness-of-fitstatistics,themodelcouldreliablybeusedtopredicttheeffectofadditionofCa-
Mgmixtureonmethaneproduction.Intheregressionmodel,thep-valuesofthebothCa-Mglinearcoefficientswerehighlysignificant(<0.005),signifyingthatbothhadalargeeffectonmethaneproduction.Thesquaredvalueof
Ca∗Cawashighlysignificant(p-value<0.005)andthesquaredvalueofMg∗Mgwassignificant(<0.05),whichsuggeststhatbothelementswereimportantformethaneproduction,butcalciumwasmoreimportantamongthetwo.On
theotherhand,theCa-Mghadahighp-value(>0.05),whichsuggeststhatthesynergisticeffectofCa-Mgonmethaneproductionwasnotthatprominent.Thiswasexpectedasbothmicronutrientsaffectdifferentmetabolicpathways.
CaandMgaresimilarlyimportantasactivatorsofvariousenzymeswhichareimportantforthegrowthandfunctioningofbacterialcommunities,buttheprimaryroleofCaistoinhibitthetoxicityoflongchainfattyacids(Kleybocker
etal.,2012).Longchainfattyacids(LCFAs)arethemajorinhibitorsforbiogasproduction(Kuangetal.,2006;Luostarinenetal.,2009),whenoveracidificationhappens.TheroleofMgistostimulatetheproductionofsinglecells
(Harris,1987; SchmidtandAhring,1993).Thehighsensitivityofsinglecells(whicharenecessaryforcatabolizingaceticacid)tolysisisanimportantfactorinthelossofaceticlasticactivityinanaerobicreactors.This
problemisheightenedinthermophilicreactorsascelllysisisaccelerated.
Table2ANOVAresultsforresponsesurfaceanalysisofadditionofCaandMgmixture.
Fig.1EffectofCa-Mgmixturesonmethaneproduction.
(1)
Fig.2Three-dimensionalresponsesurfaceoftheeffectsofCa-Mgsupplementsonmethaneproduction.
Xunetal.,1988;
Source DF AdjSS AdjMS F-value P-value
Model 5 1,299,958 259,992 19.53 0.001
Linear 2 558,910 279,455 20.99 0.001
Ca 1 260,625 260,625 19.57 0.003
Mg 1 298,285 298,285 22.4 0.002
Square 2 694,758 347,379 26.09 0.001
Ca∗Ca 1 366,375 366,375 27.52 0.001
Mg∗Mg 1 89,551 89,551 6.73 0.036
2-Wayinteraction 1 46,290 46,290 3.48 0.105
Ca∗Mg 1 46,290 46,290 3.48 0.105
Error 7 93,201 13,314
Lack-of-fit 3 87,812 29,271 21.73 0.006
Pureerror 4 5389 1347
Total 12 1,393,159
R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
93.31% 88.53% 37.66%
ItisdifficulttoevaluatethederiveddatawithotherstudiesasveryfewwereconductedtodeterminetheoptimalconcentrationsofthesemicronutrientsforthermophilicADoffoodwaste.Theresultsagreedinsomeextent
withsimilarstudiesastheoptimalconcentrationsdeterminedherefellsquarelywithinthesuggestedconcentrationsforCaandMg(TakashimaandSpeece,1990).
3.2.2Run2:Co-NimixtureFig.3showsthemethaneproductionafteraddingmixturesofCo(0,5and10mg/L)andNi (0,2.5and5mg/L).Similar toRun1, theadditionofmicronutrientsgreatly increasedmethaneproductionof thermophilicAD
process.Theenhancementwasbetween35%and40%overcontrol.Fig.4showstheRSMbasedonoptimizationofCo-Niconcentrationsformethaneproduction.Thequadraticequationusedforthismodelwas:
(2)
Fig.S2showsthe2DplotsofCo-Niconcentrationsoptimizedformaximizingmethaneproduction.Theoptimizedcombinationwas7mg/LCo2+and3mg/LNi2+,whichcouldtheoreticallyincreasebiogasyieldby45%.
Table3showsthedetailedANOVAdataoftheadditionofCo-Niforoptimizingmethaneproduction.Therelationshipbetweenthemodelandtheresponsevariable(methanegeneration)washighlysignificant(p-value<0.005),
Fig.3EffectofCo-Nimixturesonmethaneproduction.
Fig.4Three-dimensionalresponsesurfaceoftheeffectsofCo-Nisupplementsonmethaneproduction.
whilest thehighR-squared value (>93%) suggests that themodel had considerablegoodness-of-fit statistics.Hence, thismodel couldbe safely used to predict the relationshipbetween the concentrations ofCo-Ni andmethane
production.Theeffectofadditionofbothmicronutrientswashighlysignificantformethanegeneration(p-value<0.005).ThesquaretermofNiwashighlysignificant(p-value<0.005),whileCowasonlysignificantat lowp-value
(p<0.1).ThisimpliesthatNiadditionwasextremelyimportantforincreasingbiogasproduction,whileCowasstillimportantbutnotthatcritical.Moreover,theadditionofbothmicronutrientswassignificant(p<0.05),suggesting
thatCo-Nihadanimportantsynergisticeffect.Thisisbecausebothelementsaredirectlyinvolvedinmetabolicprocessesrelevanttomethanogenesis.CoisakeyelementofvitaminB12,whichisinvolvedintheactivityofmethyl
transferaserequiredforthetransferofmethylgroupsfromcompounds includingmethanol inmethanogenesis (Madiganetal.,2003).Co isalso found incarbonmonoxidedehydrogenase(CODH),whichplaysanessentialrole in
methanogenesisfromacetate(Madiganetal.,2003,Zandvoortetal.,2006).CODHalsorequiresNi,whichisfoundincofactorF430inmethyl-coenzymeMreductase(MCR)(TakashimaandSpeece,1990).F430isaporphinoid(Shima
etal.,2002)thatplaysaroleinautotrophicmethanogenesis,makingNiespeciallyimportantwhenH2andCO2arethesolesourcesofenergy.Niisatthecatalyticcentreofmosthydrogenases(Shimaetal.,2002)andmaybeinvolved
inmembranestability(JarrellandSprott,1982).
Table3ANOVAresultsforresponsesurfaceanalysisofadditionofCoandNimixture.
Source DF AdjSS AdjMS F-value P-value
Model 5 176,639 35327.8 19.16 0.001
Linear 2 88,849 44424.7 24.1 0.001
Co 1 31,284 31284.3 16.97 0.004
Ni 1 57,565 57565.2 31.23 0.001
Square 2 60,688 30,344 16.46 0.002
Co∗Co 1 7814 7814.1 4.24 0.079
Ni∗Ni 1 32,016 32015.6 17.37 0.004
2-Wayinteraction 1 27,101 27101.4 14.7 0.006
Co∗Ni 1 27,101 27101.4 14.7 0.006
Error 7 12,904 1843.5
Lack-of-fit 3 12,644 4214.5 64.66 0.001
Pureerror 4 261 65.2
Total 12 189,543
R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
93.19% 88.33% 32.60%
Itshouldbementionedthattherearenosimilarstudies,butthefindingsherearecomparablewiththosereportedbyPobeheimetal.(2010).ThesuggestedconcentrationofCoagreeswiththerangementionedinthecurrent
study,whileNiishigherbyanorderofmagnitude.Thisisduetothemesophilicconditionsanddifferentsubstratesthatwereapplied.
3.3FormulationofmicronutrientsupplementAmicronutrientsupplementwas formulatedwithCa,Mg,CoandNicontaining303,777,7,and3mg/L, respectively,basedon theprevious findings.Researchdataon theeffectof formulatedmicronutrientsupplement,
optimizedCa-Mgmixture,andoptimizedCo-Nimixture inmethaneproductionarepresented inFig.5. It seemsthat thesynergisticeffectofmicronutrientsupplementgreatlyenhanced the thermophilicADprocesscompared to
individualmixtures.Theadditionofmicronutrientsupplementwashighlysignificant(p<0.005)inimprovingmethaneproduction.Thetotalmethaneproductionwas1722mL,anincreaseof2.7timesovercontrol.Therewasalso
significant improvement (p<0.05) in theproduction in comparison to theadditionof individualmixtures (Ca-MgandCo-Ni, respectively)withat least20% increase in totalmethaneproduction.Thebatcheswith the individual
mixtures(Ca-Mg,Co-Ni)hadsimilarproductionimplyingthatthebenefitsofaddingbothgroupofelementswereequivalent.Thegasproductionprofiles,however,presentedsomedifferences.ThebatchfedwiththeCa-Mgmixture
appeared a lag phase likely resulted from the improvements in cellular stability and inhibition as described earlier in Section 3.2. The batch fedwithCo-Ni had a shorter lag phase,which could be attributed to themetabolic
enhancementsinmethanegenerationpathways.Thecombinedbenefitsofthetwogroupsasmicronutrientsupplementwasnotonlythehigherproduction,butalsoamajorreductioninprocessingtime.Ittooklessthan5daysfor85%
ofthetotalmethaneproduction.
Table4 presents the effluent characteristics (VFAs, TS removal, total and solubleCOD, and pH) at the end of the batch experiments. The experimentwith the formulatedmicronutrient supplement showed a significant
reduction ineffluentVFAsandCODandshowedaminor increase inTSdestructioncomparedtoexperimentswith individualmixturesandcontrol.Morespecifically, theresidualVFAs in thebatchwithmicronutrientsupplement
showed28–30%and45%reductioncomparedtoCa-MgandCo-Nimixturesandcontrol,respectively.TheadditionofformulatedmicronutrientsupplementgreatlyenhancedVFAutilization,whichcontributedtoimprovedmethane
productionanddecreasedacidification.ThelatterwasapparentinthenoticeablyhigherpHofthebatchwithformulatedmicronutrientsupplement(7.8comparedto7.1incontrol).Therewasanalmost3-timesreductioninCODson
additionofthemicronutrients,againpointingtoimprovedsubstrateutilization.TherewasaminorincreaseinTSdestruction(76.8%inmicronutrientsupplementvs.72.5incontrol),whilesimilarsoliddestructionpresentedtheother
batches.Regardingtracemetalsresidualconcentration,itwasfoundthatmorethan95%ofelementsinmicronutrientsupplementwereutilizedbythemicrobialactivity(datanotshown).Thissuggeststhatminoraccumulationof
precipitateswaspossible,whichcouldbetoxicinlongrun,anditcouldalsoaffecttheeconomicviabilityandsustainabilityofmicronutrientsaddition.
Table4Effluentcharacteristicsaftermicronutrientsaddition.
VFA(mM)
TSreduction(%)
CODs(g/L)
CODt(g/L)
pH
Micronutrientsupplement 1.8 76.8±0.03 3.03±0.04 18.14±0.14 7.8
Ca-Mgmixture 2.3 74.7±0.12 7.80±0.06 22.58±0.16 7.4
Co-Nimixture 2.5 76.8±0.04 6.97±0.02 24.36±0.04 7.5
Control 3.1 72.5±0.14 8.36±0.09 26.56±0.15 7.1
3.4Effectofmicronutrientsupplementoncontinuoustwo-phasethermophilicAD
Fig.5Methaneproductionusingtheformulatedmicronutrientsupplement,andmixturesofCa-Mg,andCo-Ni.
Theformulatedmicronutrientsupplementwastestedinthemethanogenicphaseoftwo-phasethermophilicADsystem.Fig.6aillustratesthemethaneyieldinthemethanogenicreactor.Thetwo-phasethermophilicADprocess
wascarriedoutwithoutanymicronutrientsupplementation for150days.Themethaneyieldaveraged0.3–0.35LCH4/gVSadded/day tillday80,when therewassomesludgewash-out.Thiscaused temporary reduction inmethane
productivityandafterwardsitfluctuatedduetounstableconditions.Atday150,themethaneyieldreachedthelowestvalue0.2LCH4/gVSadded/day.Atthispoint,themicronutrientsupplementwasaddedtothereactor.Thiswasdone
bypreparinga20×stocksolutionindistilledwaterandaddingittothefeed(effluentfromtheacidogenicphase).Theconcentrationofthevarioustracemetalsinthemethanogenicphasewasadjustedtotheformulatedmicronutrient
supplement.
Themethaneproductivitywasenhancedcontinuously forseveralweeksuntil thetraceelementsdepleted.Themicronutrientsupplementwasaddedagainonday170and190tomaintaintheoptimalconcentrationof the
micronutrientsinthemethanogenicreactor.Themethaneproductionreachedtheultimateyield0.46LCH4/gVSadded/day,whichwasnearlytwicetheproductionbeforetheadditionofthesupplement.Themethaneproductionstabilized
ataround0.43LCH4/gVSadded/day,whichwas40%increaseoverthestablemethaneproductionintheearlydaysoftheADsystem.Thisindicatesthatthemicronutrientsupplementnotonlyincreasedthemethaneproductivity,butalso
stabilizedthefailingthermophilicADprocess.
ThemethanogenicreactorwasalsomonitoredforpHandORPvariations(Fig.6b).Similartomethaneyield,pHandORPshowedfairlystableprofilestillday80,afterwhichsomedestabilizationappeared.ThepHdropped
below6afterday110,whichwasatsuboptimallevelformethanogenesis.ThepHdecreasesignifiedpossibleVFAaccumulation.ORPpresentedsimilartrend(atsuboptimallevel),withalotofdestabilizationafterday110.However,
upontheadditionofthemicronutrientsupplementonday150,bothpHandORPquicklyrecovered.Theyreachedoptimalandstablelevelsagainwithintwoweeksandremainedatthoselevelsforthedurationoftheexperiment.
Asmentionedpreviously,theeffectofformulatedmicronutrientsupplementcanbecomparedtootherstudieswithsimilarsubstrates.ClimenhagaandBanks(2008)usedamicronutrientrecipedescribedbyGonzales-Giletal.
(2000),whichconsistedof2000mg/LofCoCl2·6H2Oand142mg/LofNiCl2·6H2OamongstothertracemetalssuchasFe,Al,Zn,Cu,Mn,etc.tostabilizemethaneproductionfromsinglestagemesophilicADofcateringwastesinsemi-
CSTR.Inthatstudy,theADprocesspresentedpartlyfailureandstoppedproducingbiogasafter60daysofoperationat25dayHRT,whilethemicronutrientsupplementationallowedforstablemethaneyieldat0.4–0.5L/gVSadded/day.
Inthecurrentstudy,themethaneyieldwasstabilizedatsimilarlevels,butlessmicronutrients(4opposedto10)wasusedandatmuchlowerconcentrations.Theoptimalconcentrationscouldalsohelptominimizetheadditionalcost
and reducepotential toxicity.Furthermore,Zhangand Jahng (2012)used tracemetal supplementation to stabilizemethaneproduction from foodwaste inCSTR reactor.Amixture ofCo,Fe,MoandNi (2, 100, 10 and5mg/L,
Fig.6MonitoringthemethanogenicphaseofcontinuousthermophilicADprocess,(a)methaneyield;(b)pHandORPvariations.
respectively)wasshowntostabilizemethaneyieldat0.3–4.3L/gVSadded/day,consistentwiththeresultsfoundinthisstudy.Althoughallstudieshaddifferentsubstratesandreactorsetups,animprovementinsubstrateutilizationand
methaneproductionwasnoticedontheadditionoftracemetals.
Fig.7ashows the influentandeffluentVFAsconcentrationof themethanogenic reactor.Although theconcentrationofVFAs in the influentwasnearlyconstant, therewasamajorbuild-upofVFAs in thereactor (during
destabilization stage).By the day 150, the amount ofVFAswas nearly doubled compared to initial stage of theADprocess. This causedpHdrop (as seen inFig.6) and hence reducedmethane production. Aftermicronutrient
supplementadditiononday150,therewasadrasticincreaseofVFAsutilizationandmethaneproductionindicatingthedirectimpactofmicronutrientavailability.TheVFAsconcentrationwasfurtherreducedafterthesecondaddition
ofthesupplementandstabilizedbythetimeofthethirdaddition.TheVFAsconcentrationpresented50%reductioncomparedtodestabilizationstage.TheseresultscouldbeparticularlyattributedtotheadditionofCaandCo.Calcium
iswellknownttoplayanimportantroleincellpermeability(Chenetal.,2008)aswellasenhancetheactionofothermetals(OleszkiewiczandSharma,1990).CobaltadditionisparticularlyimportantinimprovingVFAutilization
(Zandvoortetal.,2006;GallertandWinter,2008)andforactingsynergisticallywithNiforVFAuptakeandenhancingmethanogenicactivity(MurrayandvandenBerg,1981).
Fig.7Methanogenicreactormonitoring,(a)influent/effluentVFAs;(b)influent/effluentsolubleCOD;(c)solidsdestruction.
Fig.7bshowstheinfluentandeffluentCODsvariationsofthemethanogenicreactor.WhiletheeffluentCODswasfairlyconstanttillday150,varyingbetween6and8g/L,adrasticreductionwasseenaftertheadditionofthe
micronutrientsupplement.Afterthefirstaddition,theCODslevelsdroppedrapidlyto3g/Landremainedaround2g/Lafterthesecondandthirdaddition.ThisiscomparablewitheffluentCODslevelsseeninotherstudies(Zhanget
al.,2011;ZhangandJahng,2012).SuchdrasticreductioninCODscouldexplainthesignificantimprovementinmethaneproductivity.Theinfluenceofeachmicronutrientwasexplainedatearlierparts.
TheVSandTSdestructionefficiencyprofilesarepresentedinFig.7c.VSdestructionwasaround70%beforeprocessdestabilization.Afterday70,theVSdestructionwasreducedto35%suggestinglowsubstrateutilization
efficiencyand increasedwash-outofuntreatedwaste.Although therewasa slow recoveryafterday120,micronutrient supplementationon150 lead toan immediate improvement inVSdestruction.Byday190,VSdestruction
efficiencywashigher than80%.RegardingTSdestruction efficiency, it showedaminor improvement aftermicronutrient supplementation. This improvement couldbe attributed to a healthier biomasswith enhanced substrates
utilization rates as statedabove.Studieshave shown similar improvement inVS removal, butnot to this level (Yirongetal.,2014).Coadditionhasbeen identified to improve thehealthof thebiomass (Agleretal.,2008). The
supplementationwithMgisvital,sinceitisknowntospurthegrowthofcellsdirectlyinvolvedinsubstrateutilizationandpreventbiomasswashout.Thisisespeciallysignificantastheroleofmagnesiumismostlyneglectedinmost
studiesrelatedtomicronutrientsupplementation.
ItshouldbenotedthatthebeneficialeffectsofCa,Mg,CoandNionsubstrateutilizationandmethanogenicpathwayscouldonlybeinferredbasedonpreviousstudies.Moreresearchisrequiredtoidentifythedirecteffectsof
these micronutrients. This can be achieved through investigations on gene products and bacterial community dynamics which could pinpoint the changes caused by the addition of micronutrients to the composition of the
methanogeniccommunity.Whilecommunitydynamicsstudiescouldshedsomelightontheeffectofsuchadditions(Karlssonetal.,2012),metagenomicstudieswouldbeofparticularinterest,consideringmostmicrobialcommunities
presentinADprocessareuncultured(StreitandSchmitz,2004).
4ConclusionsItwasfoundthatamicronutrientsupplementconsistedofCa,Mg,CoandNi(303,777,7and3mg/L,respectively)couldenhancemethaneproductionandstabilizethemethanogenicphaseofanaerobic
digestionprocess.Thebiogasyieldwas0.46LCH4/gVSadded/day,whiletherewasincreasedutilizationofsolubleCOD.Inmostcases,theseelementsarenotpresentinoptimalconcentrations,thus,theADprocess
usuallyoperatesatsuboptimalratesorevenfails.Thesupplementcouldbesimplymixedwiththesubstrate(oracidifiedeffluent)andaddedtothereactor.Specialemphasisandattentionshouldbegiventometal
accumulationincasethesludgeisutilizedassoilconditioner.
5Uncitedreferences
AcknowledgmentsThisstudywassupportedbytheNationalResearchFoundation,Singapore,programnumberNRF-CRP5-2009-02,fortheSchoolofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineering/ResiduesandResourceReclamation
Centre,NanyangTechnologicalUniversity,Singapore.
AppendixA.SupplementarymaterialSupplementarydataassociatedwiththisarticlecanbefound,intheonlineversion,athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.017.
ReferencesAglerM.T.,GarciaM.L.,LeeE.S.,SchlicherM.andAngenentL.T.,Thermophilicanaerobicdigestiontoincreasethenetenergybalanceofcorngrainethanol,Environ.Sci.Technol.42(17),2008,6723–6729.
AhringB.K.,PerspectivesforAnaerobicDigestioninBiomethanation,2003,Springer;Heidelberg,Germany.
AngelidakiI.,AlvesM.,BolzonellaD.,BorzacconiL.,CamposJ.L.,GuwyA.J.,KalyuzhnyiS.,JenicekP.andvanLierJ.B.,Definingthebiomethanepotential(BMP)ofsolidorganicwastesandenergycrops:aproposed
protocolforbatchassays,WaterSci.Technol.59(5),2009,927–934.
B.I.Service,2010.PreparatoryStudyonFoodWasteacrossE.U.-27fortheEuropeanCommission.<http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/bio_foodwaste_report.pdf>.
BoxG.E.andDraperN.R.,EmpiricalModel-BuildingandResponseSurfaces,1987,JohnWiley&Sons;NewYorkCity,USA .
Ahring(2003),LinandChen(1999),Nagaoetal.(2012),NgesandLiu(2010),Pelegetal.(2012),UnitedNationsIndustrialDevelopmentOrganization(2012)andZhangetal.(2013).
,18
ChenY.,ChengJ.J.andCreamerK.S.,Inhibitionofanaerobicdigestionprocess:areview,Bioresour.Technol.99(10),2008,4044–4064.
ClimenhagaM.A.andBanksC.J.,Anaerobicdigestionofcateringwastes:effectofmicronutrientsandretentiontime,WaterSci.Technol.57(5),2008,687–692.
DaiX.,DuanN.,DongB.andDaiL.,High-solidsanaerobicco-digestionofsewagesludgeandfoodwasteincomparisonwithmonodigestions:stabilityandperformance,WasteManage.33(2),2013,308–316.
delaRubiaM.A.,RomeroL.I.,SalesD.andPerezM.,Temperatureconversion(mesophilictothermophilic)ofmunicipalsludgedigestion,AIChEJ.51(9),2005,2581–2586.
DemirelB.andYenigünO.,Two-phaseanaerobicdigestionprocesses:areview,J.Chem.Tech.Biotechnol.77,2002,743–755.
FacchinV.,CavinatoC.,FatoneF.,PavanP.,CecchiF.andBolzonellaD.,Effectoftraceelementsupplementationonthemesophilicanaerobicdigestionoffoodwasteinbatchtrials:theinfluenceofinoculumorigin,
Biochem.Eng.J.70,2013,71–77.
(Gonzalez-Gil,G.,Kleerebezem,R.andLettinga,G.,Effectsofnickelandcobaltonkineticsofmethanolconversionbymethanogenicsludgeasassessedbyon-lineCH4monitoring,Appl.Environ.Microbiol.65(4),1999,1789-
1793.)GallertC.andWinterJ.,Propionicacidaccumulationanddegradationduringrestartofafull-scaleanaerobicbiowastedigester,Bioresour.Technol.99(1),2008,170–178.
(Harris,J.E.,SpontaneousdisaggregationofMethanosarcinamazeiS-6anditsuseinthedevelopmentofgenetictechniquesforMethanosarcinaspp.,Appl.Environ.Microb.53(10),1987,2500-2504.)JiangY.,HeavenS.andBanks
C.J.,Strategiesforstableanaerobicdigestionofvegetablewaste,Renew.Energy44,2012,206–214.
(Jarrell,K.F.andSprott,G.D.,NickeltransportinMethanobacteriumbryantii,J.Bacteriol.151(3),1982,1195-1203.)KarlssonA.,EinarssonP.,SchnurerA.,SundbergC.,EjlertssonJ.andSvenssonB.H.,Impactoftraceelement
additionondegradationefficiencyofvolatilefattyacids,oleicacidandphenylacetateandonmicrobialpopulationsinabiogasdigester,J.Biosci.Bioeng.114(4),2012,446–452.
KimS.,Feasibilityofbiohydrogenproductionbyanaerobicco-digestionoffoodwasteandsewagesludge,Int.J.HydrogenEnergy29(15),2004,1607–1616.
(Kuang,Y.,Pullammanappallil,P.,Lepesteur,M.andHo,G.E.,Recoveryofoleate‐inhibitedanaerobicdigestionbyadditionofsimplesubstrates,J.Chem.Technol.Biot.81(6),2006,1057-1063.)KleybockerA.,LiebrichM.,KasinaM.,
KraumeM.,WittmaierM.andWurdemannH.,Comparisonofdifferentprocedurestostabilizebiogasformationafterprocessfailureinathermophilicwastedigestionsystem:influenceofaggregateformationon
processstability,WasteManage.32(6),2012,1122–1130.
(Lo,H.M.,Kurniawan,T.A.,Sillanpaa,M.E.,Pai,T.Y.,Chiang,C.F.,Chao,K.P.,Liu,M.H.,Chuang,S.H.,Banks,C.J.,Wang,S.C.,Lin,K.C.,Lin,C.Y.,Liu,W.F.,Cheng,P.H.,Chen,C.K.,Chiu,H.Y.andWu,H.Y.,ModelingbiogasproductionfromorganicfractionofMSWco-digestedwithMSWIashesinanaerobicbioreactors,Bioresour.Technol.101(16),2010,6329-6335.)LinC.Y.andChenC.C.,EffectofheavymetalsonthemethanogenicUASBgranule,Water
Res.33(2),1999,409–416 (Luostarinen,S.,Luste,S.andSillanpaa,M.,Increasedbiogasproductionatwastewatertreatmentplantsthroughco-digestionofsewagesludgewithgreasetrapsludgefromameatprocessingplant,
Bioresour.Technol.100(1),2009,79-85.).
(Madigan,M.,Martinko,J.,Bender,K.,BuckleyD.andStahlD.,Brockbiologyofmicroorganisms,2015,PearsonEducationLimited,Essex,England.)MenonA.,RenF.,WangJ.-Y. andGiannisA.,Effectofpretreatmenttechniques
onfoodwastesolubilizationandbiogasproductionduringthermophilicbatchanaerobicdigestion,J.Mater.CyclesWaste18,2015,222–230.
MillerP.A.andClesceriN.L.,WasteSitesasBiologicalReactors–CharacterizingandModeling,2003,LewisPublishers;BocaRaton,USA.
MurrayW.D.andVanDenBergL.,Effectsofnickel,cobalt,andmolybdenumonperformanceofmethanogenicfixed-filmreactors,Appl.Environ.Microbiol.42(3),1981,502–505.
NagaoN.,TajimaN.,KawaiM.,NiwaC.,KurosawaN.,MatsuyamaT.,YusoffF.M.andTodaT.,Maximumorganicloadingrateforthesingle-stagewetanaerobicdigestionoffoodwaste,Bioresour.Technol.118,2012,
210–218.
NgesI.A.andLiuJ.,Effectsofsolidretentiontimeonanaerobicdigestionofdewatered-sewagesludgeinmesophilicandthermophilicconditions,Renew.Energy35(10),2010,2200–2206.
OleszkiewiczJ.A.andSharmaV.K.,Stimulationandinhibitionofanaerobicprocessesbyheavymetals–areview,Biol.Waste31,1990,45–67.
PelegM.,NormandM.D.andCorradiniM.G.,TheArrheniusequationrevisited,Crit.Rev.FoodSci.Nutr.52(9),2012,830–851.
PobeheimH.,MunkB.,JohanssonJ.andGuebitzG.M.,Influenceoftraceelementsonmethaneformationfromasyntheticmodelsubstrateformaizesilage,Bioresour.Technol.101(2),2010,836–839.
SchattauerA.,AbdounE.,WeilandP.,PlöchlM.andHeiermannM.,Abundanceoftraceelementsindemonstrationbiogasplants,Biosyst.Eng.108(1),2011,57–65.
SchmidtJ.E.andAhringB.K.,Effectsofmagnesiumonthermophilicacetate-degradinggranulesinupflowanaerobicsludgeblanket(UASB)reactors,Enzym.Microbiol.Technol.15,1993,304–310.
ShenF.,YuanH.,PangY.,ChenS.,ZhuB.,ZouD.,LiuY.,MaJ.,YuL.andLiX.,Performancesofanaerobicco-digestionoffruitandvegetablewaste(FVW)andfoodwaste(FW):single-phasevs.two-phase,Bioresour.
Technol.144,2013,80–85.
(Shima,S.,Warkentin,E.,Thauer,R.K.andErmler,U.,Structureandfunctionofenzymesinvolvedinthemethanogenicpathwayutilizingcarbondioxideandmolecularhydrogen,J.Biosci.Bioeng.93(6),2002,519-530.)Speece
R.E.,Anaerobicbiotechnologyforindustrialwastewatertreatment,Environ.Sci.Technol.17,1983,416–427.
StreitW.R.andSchmitzR.A.,Metagenomics-thekeytotheunculturedmicrobes,Curr.Opin.Microbiol.7(5),2004,492–498.
TakashimaM.andSpeeceR.E.,Mineralrequirementsformethanefermentation,Crit.Rev.Environ.Contr.19(5),1990,465–479.
UnitedNationsIndustrialDevelopmentOrganization,2010.FoodWastes.<http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/import/32068_35FoodWastes>(accessed2February2012).
USEPA,FactsandFiguresfor2012.<http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/municipal/pubs/2012_msw_fs.pdf>.
WangX.,YangG.,FengY.,RenG.andHanX.,Optimizingfeedingcompositionandcarbon-nitrogenratiosforimprovedmethaneyieldduringanaerobicco-digestionofdairy,chickenmanureandwheatstraw,Bioresour.
Technol.120,2012,78–83.
WardA.J.,HobbsP.J.,HollimanP.J.andJonesD.L.,Optimisationoftheanaerobicdigestionofagriculturalresources,Bioresour.Technol.99(17),2008,7928–7940.
WeiQ.,ZhangW.,GuoJ.,WuS.,TanT.,WangF.andDongR.,Performanceandkineticevaluationofasemi-continuouslyfedanaerobicdigestertreatingfoodwaste:effectoftraceelementsonthedigesterrecoveryand
stability,Chemosphere117,2014,477–485.
YirongC.,HeavenS.andBanksC.J.,Effectofatraceelementadditionstrategyonvolatilefattyacidaccumulationinthermophilicanaerobicdigestionoffoodwaste,WasteBiol.Valoriz.6(1),2014,1–12.
(Zandvoort,M.H.,vanHullebusch,E.D.,Gieteling,J.andLens,P.N.L,Granularsludgeinfull-scaleanaerobicbioreactors:Traceelementcontentanddeficiencies,EnzymeMicrob.Tech.39(2),2006,337-346.)ZhangC.,SuH.,BaeyensJ.andTanT.,
Reviewingtheanaerobicdigestionoffoodwasteforbiogasproduction,Renew.Sustain.EnergyRev.38,2014,383–392.
ZhangC.,SuH.andTanT.,Batchandsemi-continuousanaerobicdigestionoffoodwasteinadualsolid–liquidsystem,Bioresour.Technol.145,2013,10–16.
ZhangL.,LeeY.W.andJahngD.,Anaerobicco-digestionoffoodwasteandpiggerywastewater:focusingontheroleoftraceelements,Bioresour.Technol.102(8),2011,5048–5059.
ZhangL.andJahngD.,Long-termanaerobicdigestionoffoodwastestabilizedbytraceelements,WasteManage.32(8),2012,1509–1515.
ZhangR.,El-MashadH.M.,HartmanK.,WangF.,LiuG.,ChoateC.andGambleP.,Characterizationoffoodwasteasfeedstockforanaerobicdigestion,Bioresour.Technol.98(4),2007,929–935.
AppendixA.SupplementarymaterialMultimediaComponent1
Supplementarydata1
Highlights
• CH4yieldoftwophasethermophilicADwasenhancedbymicronutrientaddition.
• ThesupplementconsistedofCa,Mg,CoandNi.
• Optimalconcentrationofmicronutrientsidentifiedusingresponsesurfaceanalysis.
QueriesandAnswersQuery:Yourarticleisregisteredasaregularitemandisbeingprocessedforinclusioninaregularissueofthejournal.IfthisisNOTcorrectandyourarticlebelongstoaSpecialIssue/Collectionpleasecontacte.j@elsevier.comimmediatelypriortoreturningyourcorrections.Answer:Correct.Thearticleshouldbeincludedinaregularissue.
Query:Theauthornameshavebeentaggedasgivennamesandsurnames(surnamesarehighlightedintealcolor).Pleaseconfirmiftheyhavebeenidentifiedcorrectly.Answer:Allnamesarecorrect.
Query:References‘Madiganetal.(2003),Zandvoortetal.(2006),Loetal.(2010),Kuangetal.(2006),Luostarinenetal.(2009),Harris(1987),Xunetal.(1988),Shimaetal.(2002),JarrellandSprott(1982),Gonzales-Giletal.(2000)andGallertandWinter(2006)’arecitedinthetextbutnotprovidedinthereferencelist.Pleaseprovidetheminthereferencelistordeletethesecitationsfromthetext.Answer:Referencesaddedinthelist.Reference:Xunetal.(1988)isdeleted.
Query:Pleasecheckthehierarchyofthesectionheadings.Answer:Weagreewithhierarchygiven.
Query:Thecitations‘Chenetal.(2007),GallertandWinter(2006)andYirongetal.(2015)’havebeenchangedtomatchtheauthordateinthereferencelist.Pleasecheckhereandinsubsequentoccurrences,andcorrectifnecessary.Answer:Weagree.Thanksforthecorrection.
Query:Thissectioncomprisesreferencesthatoccurinthereferencelistbutnotinthebodyofthetext.Pleasepositioneachreferenceinthetextor,alternatively,deleteit.Anyreferencenotdealtwithwillberetainedinthissection.Answer:Deleleallreferences.
Query:Oneormoresponsornamesmayhavebeeneditedtoastandardformatthatenablesbettersearchingandidentificationofyourarticle.Pleasecheckandcorrectifnecessary.Answer:Agree.
Query:ThecountrynamesoftheGrantSponsorsareprovidedbelow.Pleasecheckandcorrectifnecessary.‘NationalResearchFoundation’-‘SouthAfrica’.Answer:Agree.
Query:Pleasecheckthepagerangeinreference‘BoxandDraper(1987)’.Answer:Revised.
• VSdestructionefficiencywasmorethan80%.