Upload
vijaykumar-kulkarni
View
815
Download
10
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Under the guidance:Prof. Dr. Shun Ping Chen Presented by:
Sumana Vinay [739436]Vijaykumar Kulkarni [739437]
NEXT GENERATION
ROADMs
CONTENTS:IntroductionOverview on ROADMFlexible Optical Network• Functionality requirements of NG ROADMs
Technology building blocks of NG ROADMs• Route and Select architecture• Wavelength Switched Optical Network • Benefits of NG ROADMsConclusion AcknowledgementReferences
Introduction
ROADMs are evolving to support market demands for increasing bandwidth and enhanced flexible wavelength routing.
The trend towards dynamic capacity allocation demands ROADMs to be-
Colorless, Directionless, Contentionless and Gridless.ROADM evolution from 2-degree fixed wavelength
add-drop to present >= 8 degree CDC add-drop architecture.
Next-generation solution that offers true network agility has put ROADM at the forefront of the race to stay ahead of the traffic explosion.
Overview on ROADMFujitsu was the first vendor to develop and deploy ROADM technology
in 2003 and the first to incorporate a WSS-based optical switch fabric. ROADM (Reconfigurable Optical Add Drop Multiplexer) is an optical
network element which is able to Add/Drop or Pass through any wavelength.
ROADM along with optical amplifiers, multiplexer-demultiplexer, transponder or/and muxponder cards constitutes a complete, flexible, optical transport node.
All optical subsystem which enables remote configuration of wavelengths at any time.
Technologies used- Wavelength blocking, Planar Lightwave Circuit (PLC), Wavelength Selective Switch (WSS).
FIXED RECONFIGURABLE
MANUALINTERVENTIO
NAUTOMATED
Operational Benefits: Operational Simplicity
Remotely configurable. Per wavelength SW provisioning and
management. Simple cabling.
Faster Deployment No re-engineering when capacity is
exceeded as in fixed OADM. Increased Reliability
Network requires fewer manual touches.
Software configuration reduces erroneous cabling errors.
De-Mux Mux
MuxOpticalSpaceSwitch
De-mux
ADM
ROADM is a
TECHNOLOGY
ENABLER
Flexible Optical NetworksWSS based ROADMs have been deployed widely in
networks through out the world –they are functionally efficient but not flexible.
Flexibility is required to move towards next phase of optical switching.
First generation ROADMs architectures are limited by:-Fixed wavelength assignments to specific ports.-Fixed direction assignments for multiplexers (i.e. North only, South only…)-Partitioned add/drop structures due to wavelength contention conflicts.
Need for NEXT GENERATION ROADMs …
Functionality requirements of NG ROADMs
COLORLESS or COLOR INDEPENDENT functionality
DIRECTIONLESS or DIRECTION INDEPENDENT functionality
CONTENTIONLESS or WAVELENGTH CONTENTION FREE functionality
GRIDLESS or FLEXIBLE ITU GRID functionality
High-Level NG ROADM Requirements
1 Multi-degree ROADMN = 8-16 for MetroN = 6-8 for Long Haul9.6 Tb capacity per fiberFlexible bandwidth allocation Future proof express pathHigh level of integrationAdvanced AutomationSupervision and Monitoring
Degree
Degree
Degree
Degree
Degree
Degree
CDCTransponder
Pools
3
N N
4
2
Current Transponder Pools support 40G/100G (coherent)
ColorlessDirectionless Contentionless
Directed V/s Directionless ROADM
•Fixed add/drop portsfor particular direction
•Change in direction requires physicalrewiring by technician
Figure : 3rd degree ROADM with directed architecture
If Nod
e fails
?
ROADMWest
ROADMEast
Directional ROADMLineWest
LineEast
Add/DropWest
Add/DropEast
ROADMWest
ROADMEast
Directionless ROADM
NxN Switch FabricNxN Switch FabricNxN Switch Fabric
In directional ROADM recabling of transponders needed.
In directionless ROADM , no recabling is needed
Colored V/s Colourless ROADM
Colored access ports imply that physical access ports (add or drop) are assigned to a specific wavelength.
Physically change the fiber connectivity between the transceiver and access ports to change wavelength.
No dynamic wavelength change.
In colorless architecture, without changing port the color of the wavelength can be reconfigured.
No recabling needed.
ROADMWest
ROADMEast
Colourless ROADM
Contentionless ROADMs
Even with colorless and directionless functionality, the ROADM network is still limited by the total number of flexible CD add/drop ports available.
If two wavelengths of same color converge at same add/drop port of WSS -
Leads to Wavelength blocking /wavelength contention!Solution- Replace CD mux/demux units with new
set of add/drop units called Contentionless add/drop units (n X m unit instead of 1 X n /n X 1)
What is Contentionless Add/Drop ?
ROADM
RX
TX
RX
TX
Contention-less – In the same Add/Drop device you can add and drop the same frequency to multiple ports.
ROADM
RX
TX
RX
TX
Directionless – Wavelength can be routed from any Add/Drop port to any direction in software.
ROADM
RX
TX
RX
TX
Colorless – ROADM ports are not frequency specific (re-tuned laser does not require fiber move)
Increasing traffic
Increased usage of video and online applications through new devices such as smart phones and tablets- demands more BANDWIDTHNeed for faster network and higher optical performance.
Pressure on optical networks!Insufficient bandwidth!
SOLUTION ?
1) Increase number of channels :80 96 100 150
More channels= more spectrum space.
But problem of physics!
2) Allocate bandwidth flexibly instead of 50GHz
Not a standard!
3) Signal shaping- DSP in transmitters of transponder
- OFDM
- Nyquist filtering
Gridless or Flexible GRID
Capacity Enhancements in DWDM Networks
…
Legacy networks as deployed today:
50 GHz, fixed grid
40G
40G
40G
40G
10G
10G
10G10
0G
50GHz
Spec
tral
occ
upan
cy
1T
…
50GHz
200GHz
, nm
100
G
400
G
1T
200
G
100GHz
Spec
tral
occ
upan
cy 50GHz
Future networks:50-200 GHz, flexible grid
, nm
Flex Spectrum DWDM Architecture
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4
DSP-Enabled
Transmitters
Flex SpectrumROADM
Signal Shaping
50GHz 50GHz 50GHz
TX1
TX2
TX3
TX4
Ch1 Ch2 Ch3 Ch4
Today‘s 50GHz Grid SystemFlexSpectrum DWDM system
Optical multiplexer
Denser ChannelSpacing
SUPER CHANNEL
OFDM/
Flexible Grid/Gridless implies a more granular version of the spectrum usage, down to 12.5GHz (ITUT G.694.1)
Hence, ROADM nodes supporting a flexible grid could operate at any speed that is based on increments of 12.5GHz spacing.
This ensures optimum and wise usage of spectrum.Moreover, it opens a gate for dynamic allocation and usage of
the ITU Grid.
Isn’t it AMAZING!
Technology building blocks of NG ROADMs
•Wavelength selective switch (WSS) is the heart of current generation ROADM networks also for the NG networks.
•CDC ROADM is nothing but N X M WSS capable of switching wavelength from multiple input port to several output port.
2003
WSS Year of deployment2 x 1 20039 x 1 200716 x 1 201220x1 2013
Traditional----------Current
BroadcastMesh
Patch Panel
Legacy ROADM – Broadcast & Select
• Ingress channels from each degree are passively split (broadcast) to all other degrees (plus the per-degree add/drop)
• Mux WSS blocks all channels not intended for that degree (selects those that are)
• Channel isolation becomes difficult as the number of degrees increases (creates large penalty for 16 QAM channels)
• directionless add/drop consumes an available degree; Colorless requires add/drop WSS ( using a larger split ratio on the ingress not practical from a network OSNR requirement)
WSS ‘Select’
WSS
‘Sel
ect’
WSS
‘Select’
Per DegreeAdd/Drop
Per DegreeAdd/Drop
Per DegreeAdd/Drop
Deg
ree
A
Degree B
Degree C
“Broadcast and Select” Architecture
RoutedFull Mesh
Patch Panel
ROADM – Route & Select
• Demux WSS ‘routes’ any combination of waves from COM-RX to any output port (drop and other degrees)
• Mux WSS ‘selects’ any combination of waves from its input ports (add and other degrees) to COM-TX
• Channels are isolated by both the ingress and egress WSS, improving performance
• By eliminating the splitter, insertion loss is reduced, preserving channel OSNR
• Enables directionless and colorless at large scale
Add Structure
Drop Structure
WSS‘Select’
WSS‘Route’
WSS
‘Sel
ect’
WSS
‘Rou
te’ W
SS‘Select’
WSS
‘Route’
Deg
ree
A
Degree B
Degree C
“Route and Select” Architecture
WSONWSON (wavelength swithed optical network) is a standards based GMPLS control plane which imparts intelligence to the optical layer.
Two types of control plane are prominent : Peer type and overlay type.WSON is an overlay based control plane.Control plane can be centralised or distributed.
Looking ahead for – Agile Optical Layer!
NCS 2000
Embedded Optical
Intelligence
Tunable Laser
Colorless
Tunable Receiver
Directionless
Contention-less
Gridless
WSONWavelength Switched Optical Network
Complete Control in Software, No Physical Intervention Required
TOUCHLESS OPTICAL LAYER + EMBEDDED
WSON INTELLIGENCE = COMPLETELY AGILE
OPTICAL LAYER
Benefits of NG ROADMs
Wavelength and Route flexibility (with CDC architecture)
Automatic wavelength restorationLoad balancing as network and traffic evolvesSupport for datarates beyond 100Gb/sFully automated link provisioning
ROADM market
Ref: Dupont Photonics Technologies
CONCLUSIONNext-generation ROADM devices prepares service
providers to meet today’s traffic needs and the needs of tomorrow.
“Gridless” or flex spectrum enables mixed channel plans adjustable in software to accommodate a mix of today’s modulation as well as future modulations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Firstly, we would like to thank Prof. Dr. Chen for giving us an opportunity to share a gist of our knowledge in next generation optical networks.
Also , we thank our friends and colleagues for their immense support and co-operation for making this presentation successful.
REFERENCES:M.A.F. Roelens, D. Williams, J. Bolger and B.J. Eggleton “Advanced
applications of flexible ROADM technology PhotonicsGlobal@Singapore, (2008). IPGC 2008. IEEE 10.1109/IPGC.2008.4781453.
“ New Devices Enabling Software Defined Optical Networks”, Brandon Collings from JDSU.IEEE Communications Magazine • March 2013.
“The ROADM to smarter Optical Networking”, George Lawton, Computing Now Exclusive Content — July 2010 .
“Benefits and Requirements of Flexible Grid ROADM’s and networks” by Sheryl L Woodward and Mark.D. Feuer.VOL. 5, NO. 10/OCTOBER 2013/J. OPT. COMMUN. NETW.
S. Gringeri, B. Basch, V. Shukla, R. Egorov, and T. J. Xia,“Flexible architectures for optical transport nodes and networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 40–50, July 2010.
Any queries or
Suggestions???
THANK YOU