Opposition Report

  • Upload
    bekirm1

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 Opposition Report

    1/3

    Opposition report to Cloud Based

    Payroll Management System

    By group 13

    Michael AlmrSimon hman

    Asif HasanZohaib AslamBekir Morina

    Project Management for IT Systems / DSV

    2011-09-22

  • 7/23/2019 Opposition Report

    2/3

    1 Background

    The background is well written, but the reference in the text and icture to Armbust is notenough! "ho is he and wh# is he not mentioned as a reference$

    2 Executie Summary

    %n this art &different le'els of risks( are mentioned! There is nothing written an#where in thero)ect roosal about the sensiti'e securit# matters that occur after the imlementation of thisro)ect about the organi*ation+s information! %n articular, what about the confidentialit# andintegrit# of the information that are stored in the cloud! This is 'er# imortant for the ro)ect,because not e'er# otential client in the market is familiar with securit# of information in theclouds! Also, authors should ha'e cleared out how oen source software and con'incing clientsto bu# the ser'ice will be achie'ed which seems rett# hard!

    3 Business Case

    3!1 Pro"lem de#inition or opportunity description

    The art of this section is clear and understandable but the# do not mention %T securit# risksthat is a imortant area in these kind of ro)ect!

    3!2 $im

    The aim of this reort is to offer comanies more effecti'e a#roll s#stem !%n otherwords some of the things mentioned in the re'ious sections should be mentioned here in amore comact wa#!

    3!3 %oal

    Man# think that cloud comuting is unsafe because #ou don+t know exact where the data isstored! Securit# should thereb# be a main goal for this ro)ect to con'ince there reader that thisis a roduct he-she can rel# on!"h# mention beta 'ersion in the main goal$ %t should be mentioned as a subgoal!

    3!& Su"'%oals

    Securit# should also be mentioned here as a subgoal!

    3!( Options aaila"le and considered

    The grammar are not as good as with the rest of the reort but the content is good and eas# tounderstand!

    3!) Cost'"ene#it analysis

    "here is aendix .$ %f it+s the same as the resentation, /.0 S12-h is not a &cost(, it+s salar#!

    The anal#se do not co'er how long it will take for the ro)ect to be rofitable! 3oes the feeinclude the cost from the cloud comuter ro'ider$ /00 S12-month sounds extremel# chea!

  • 7/23/2019 Opposition Report

    3/3

    3!* +mpact and ,isks

    "h# secif# an exact cloud comuting s#stem in the ro)ect roosal$ Another 4uestion is wh#the# chose a cloud comuting s#stem that costs mone# when the# don+t ha'e an#$ Ma#be takesome time to look on cloud comuting s#stems that are for free$ 5ood to refer to more risks in aendix B!

    3!- Met.od

    "ell written! "hat does conduces mean$ %t can+t be translated through google translate, itfeels a bit unnecessar#!

    3!/ Conclusions and recommendations

    The text is 'er# good, but the# mention to increase securit# here, but not in aim or goals!

    ,e#erences

    There are no numbers on the references and the# are not referred to in the text! This makesthe reort not trustworth#!

    The first and the last reference are 'er# good! The second one are not good, where can % findit$ The third one are good, but #ou either use &,( or &and(6 7ot both!

    $ppendix $

    8oncise, not sure how the arrows are necessar# though!

    & $ppendix B

    The table ends on age &unknown( and then continues on age &/(!"h# is the table closed at the bottom of age unknown and oen at the to on age /$

    9isk number /6 5ood to ha'e this risk, but #ou will code the rogram and if it gets hacked, who

    Summary o# 0.at 0e t.ink

    The idea to de'elo an online a#roll s#stem for an organisation is a 'er# good idea, andindeed it is a 'er# effecti'e wa# of managing and keeing tracks of emlo#ee+s wages, lea'es,taxes etc! But this ro)ect includes allot of ractical securit# issues, and s#chological rerearation of the otential clients about the safeness of their information! And this ro)ectroosal lacks eseciall# on that! Another thing that sta#s unclear is costumer+s suort! "e recommend that authors of this ro)ect roosal should be more focused in the securit#matters, which will con'ince otential clients that their information+s confidentialit# and integrit#will remain intacted!