OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCY DEPARTURE & CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS

OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCY

DEPARTURE & CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES

DEPARTURE & CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES

CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT

OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS

CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT

OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS


OVERVIEWOVERVIEW

• Preface

• Definitions / Terminology

• Departure Procedures

• Chart Interpretation

• Regulatory Requirements

• Flight Profiles

• Performance Planning

• Preface

• Definitions / Terminology

• Departure Procedures

• Chart Interpretation

• Regulatory Requirements

• Flight Profiles

• Performance Planning


OVERVIEWOVERVIEW

• Jeppesen Airport Analysis

• Task 3050

• Jeppesen Procedures

• OSTM 04-07

• Jeppesen Airport Analysis

• Task 3050

• Jeppesen Procedures

• OSTM 04-07


PrefacePreface

• Safety

• Mission accomplishment

• Civil use

• Army policy

• Safety

• Mission accomplishment

• Civil use

• Army policy


Definitions / TerminologyDefinitions / Terminology

• Accel Go / Stop

• V1

• Gross / Net Climb Gradient

• Segments

• Accel Go / Stop

• V1

• Gross / Net Climb Gradient

• Segments


Departure ProceduresDeparture Procedures

• Types– Standard Instrument Departure– Radar Vectors– Alternate Departure Procedures– Diverse Departures– VFR

• Types– Standard Instrument Departure– Radar Vectors– Alternate Departure Procedures– Diverse Departures– VFR



• Background

• Necessity

• Obstruction Clearance Criteria

• Background

• Necessity

• Obstruction Clearance CriteriaNOTE

When used by the controller during departure, the termradar contact should not be interpreted as relieving pilots of their responsibility to maintain appropriate

terrain and obstruction clearance.



• Obstacle Clearance Responsibility

• Location of DPs

• Jeppesen

• Pilot Responsibilities

• Obstacle Clearance Responsibility

• Location of DPs

• Jeppesen

• Pilot Responsibilities


Construction of ProceduresConstruction of Procedures

• Zone 1• Zone 1








Chart InterpretationChart Interpretation

• Obstacle Departure vs. ATC Climb

• Angle vs. Gradient

• Obstacle Departure vs. ATC Climb

• Angle vs. Gradient


Regulatory RequirementsRegulatory Requirements

• DOD

• Army

• SOP

• ICAO

• Civil

• Other Military Services

• DOD

• Army

• SOP

• ICAO

• Civil

• Other Military Services


Aircraft Takeoff Flight ProfilesAircraft Takeoff Flight Profiles

• C-12

• C-26

• UC-35

• C-12

• C-26

• UC-35


Performance PlanningPerformance Planning

• C-12

• C-26

• UC-35

• C-12

• C-26

• UC-35


Jeppesen OpsData

Contingency ProceduresContingency Procedures

OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCYArmy Aviation

Since 1978, Jeppesen OpsData has provided corporate and military operators, regional and mid-sized airlines, and large international air carriers with customized airport analysis.



HistoryHistory:

HowHow did Jeppesen get involved did Jeppesen get involved with the USAF?with the USAF?

Jackson HoleAugust 1996



Eastern View from Jackson Hole

Impact Point

11,239’ - 6,480 = 4759 feet/10 NM = 476 Feet/NM

10 nm

11,239’ MSL

6,445’ MSL



Flawed Policy

The SIB identified

3 areas where AF operational policy was deficient :

IFR Departure ProceduresTerrain AvoidanceClimb Performance


The “System” is Broken

Problem Resolution - Look for civilian engine-out planning “best practices”.

USAF came to Jeppesen for help in determining what those best practices were.


Jeppesen Airport AnalysisThe analysis of airport specific information to provide

maximum allowable takeoff weights based upon an up to date definition of the terrain and man made

obstacles and assuming the loss of an engine at the critical engine failure speed.

OpsData Concept


US Military Aircraft Benefiting From Web Based OpsData

C-17AAC-130H/AC C-9CAC-130U/AU C/KC-135EC-130E/E HC-130 P/HPC-130H/H KC-10AC-130H/HR KC-135R/TLC-130H/LCL C-20A/B/CC-26B C-17LC-130H/LCL 2 C-32C-21A MC-130E/MEC-37A MC-130P/MPC-5 WC-130H/WCC-12 Air Force OneC-9A/B C-40

Users


How Do We Do It?How Do We Do It?

Create A/C Performance SoftwareCreate A/C Performance Software

Deliver Output to Customer Via Deliver Output to Customer Via WebWeb

Army Aviation

Run Performance Against Run Performance Against ObstaclesObstacles


A/C Performance AnalysisCompliance with governing regulations is achieved through the use of approved flight manual data and established business rules.


We Digitize the Performance Charts in the Flight Manuals to Create Aircraft Specific Max Takeoff

Weights

We Digitize the Performance Charts in the Flight Manuals to Create Aircraft Specific Max Takeoff

Weights


The aircraft performance software then

considers 3 items to determine the maximum

allowable takeoff weight.

1. Critical field length

2. Obstacle clearance

3. Climb gradients





Army Aviation



OpsData then provides maximum takeoff weight tables for ”engine-out” analysis for runway, climb, and obstacle consideration.


Weight Optimization Programs Assume a Balanced Field Philosophy with One Engine Inoperative at the

critical engine failure speed.

OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCYAnalysis Tools


OpsData weight tables require all obstacles to be cleared by at least 35 feet.


When the team of OpsData Analysts build an Engine-Out Procedure (EOP), they first consider a straight out flight path along the extended runway centerline out to approximately 30 nautical miles (nm).

OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCYAnalysis Tools


If the obstructions identified during the straight-out analysis are too limiting, a turning Engine-Out Procedure is then drafted by the OpsData Analysts.


Those engine-out turn procedures are then available for the crews to use if they lose an engine on takeoff


We use the most complete obstacle and terrain database in the world






Update flow is much more agile with the web-based system. •Old method: 28 day updates. Result: STALE DATA•New method: changes are posted to the web when new data is received. Result: Greatly enhanced safety!





Army Aviation



Product OverviewProduct OverviewProduct OverviewProduct Overview1. Web Access

What the User Sees


Product OverviewProduct OverviewProduct OverviewProduct Overview2. Web Access

What the User Sees


Product OutputProduct OutputProduct OutputProduct Output 3. Special Departure Procedures

Textual & Graphical

Procedures

What the User Sees


Product OutputProduct OutputProduct OutputProduct Output 4. Airport Analysis

Maximum Weight Tables

What the User Sees


Task 3050Task 3050


Task 3050Task 3050


Task 3050 Procedure Task 3050 Procedure

• C-12

• C-26

• UC-35

• C-12

• C-26

• UC-35


Task 3050Task 3050


Task 3050Task 3050


Jeppesen ProceduresJeppesen Procedures

• C-12• C-12



• C-26• C-26



• UC-35• UC-35


GraphicsGraphics


OSTM 04-07OSTM 04-07

• References

• Applicability

• Implementation

• Operations

• Training

• Documentation

• References

• Applicability

• Implementation

• Operations

• Training

• Documentation


Why is this solution right for the OSAA?Why is this solution right for the OSAA?

• Safest Solution AvailableSafest Solution Available• Easiest Solution AvailableEasiest Solution Available• Robust Delivery MechanismRobust Delivery Mechanism


What is needed from the community?What is needed from the community?

• List of AirportsList of Airports


QUESTIONS

?

Users









Documents

OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCY DEPARTURE & CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS