Upload
carlos-cervantes
View
27
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Operational Excellence. Establishing a Culture of Quality. Agenda. Models & Patterns of OPEX programs. 1. The Cultural Challenge. 2. Summary. 3. 6. New drug approvals are not keeping pace with rising R&D expenditures. Number of NMEs first launched onto the world market. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Operational Excellence
Establishing a Culture of Quality
April 5th ,2011
Prof. Dr. Thomas Friedli
2 ©ITEM-HSG
Agenda
Models & Patterns of OPEX programs1
The Cultural Challenge2
Summary3
3 ©ITEM-HSG
New drug approvals are not keeping pace with risingR&D expenditures
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
20022001200019991997 1998
40
35
30
25
50
20
0
R&
D e
xpen
ditu
res
($ b
n)
2011*2010*2009*2008*20072006200520042003
Num
ber
of
NM
Es
45
Global R&D expenditures
Number of NMEs first launched onto the world market
Source: CMR Factbook (2008)
+70 %-50 %
4 ©ITEM-HSG
The New Economics of Innovation
Historical margins
Historicalrevenues Revenues with greater
price pressures andshorter cycles
Productintroduction
Dol
lars
Years from product launch
Historical fixed development and manufacturing costs
6 12
New fixed development and manufacturing costs
Margins in new environment
Source: Pisano, HBS
5 ©ITEM-HSG
Why should you care about manufacturing? – Cost structure on Company level
18%11%
25%
12%
11%
9%
Contract manufacturer
4%
63%
3%
Generics manufacturer
20%
53%
5%
Brand-name companies
22%
31%
13%
MarginSales & MarketingGeneral & AdministrationManufacturingR&D
Source: University of St.Gallen, Benchmarking Industry Report (2009)
6 ©ITEM-HSG
Pharma has no Track Record of Thinking in Process Improvements! Pharmaceutical Manufacturing has traditionally focused on end-
product quality!
The Pharmaceutical Industry has not focused on developing a scientific understanding of their processes. This leads to a high rate of internal failures such as reworks and rejects!
Pharmaceutical manufacturing processes are often complex and include many non-value-added activities!
Pharmaceutical manufacturing tended to view individual sites independently!
The role of leadership and "human effects" had been neglected!
7 ©ITEM-HSG
A Framework for thinking about Operational ExcellenceOPEX Framework
Effective Management System
Direction settingManagement commitment and company culture
Employee involvement & continuous improvement
Functional integration & qualification
Op
erational P
erforman
ce
Preventive maintenance
HousekeepingEffective
technology
usage
TPM
Process management
Customer integration
Cross-funct.product
development
Supplier quality
management
TQM
Set - up time reductions
Pull system
Planningadherence
Layout -optimization
JIT
Stable running machines Stable processes Low inventory
Standardizedreplenishment
Low abseentism
& fluctuation
High continuous
improvement ratesLow absenteeism &
fluctuationFlexible
workforce
Self -directed
teams
1 2 3
Standardizedequipment
Standardizedprocesses
Source: University of St.Gallen
8 ©ITEM-HSG
-199X
"Pre-OPEX"
200x 201x
"Best PracticeTransfer"
"Transformation"
"Integrated Operations System"
Level of Operational Excellence
The Evolution of OPEX in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Source: Friedli et al. - Pathway to Operational Excellence (2010)
9 ©ITEM-HSG
The current phase of leading companies!
The "Transformation"
Phase
Operational Practices &
Tools
Innovation and Change
Management
Managerial and HR-based
Practices
Training Program
Quality System and Process
Control
Coaching and teaching Coaching techniques as well as
leadership practices such as Gemba are added to OPEX training concepts
HR gets more integrated into OPEX
Role of Leadership To solve problems and to
improve their daily work Improvements often struggle to
stay sustainable, payoffs are not as high as expected
Discussions about the role function of operations leaders as coaches and teachers got a key issue
Companywide Initiatives and Programs Companywide tool-boxes Common language and holistic view of
performance. Different initiatives cooperate with each other
Process Understanding More sufficient
techniques like real-time controlling
The foundation of process understanding has reached a reliable level for the first time
Large Scale Change Process Large scale
transformation processes focusing on organizational set-up
Innovations and changes are driven by Senior Management and Site Leadership Teams
Change pattern: Unfreeze- Transition - Refreeze
Source: Friedli et al. - Pathway to Operational Excellence (2010)
10 ©ITEM-HSG
Wyeth: Setting a Focus on Redefining Leader's Role
1
Source: Wyeth; Friedli et al. – The Pathway to Operational Excellence (2010)
11 ©ITEM-HSG
MerckSerono: Defining a Suitable Deployment Structure
Source: MerckSerono; Friedli et al. – The Pathway to Operational Excellence (2010)
12 ©ITEM-HSG
Example of an operational excellence iniative – Right First Time by Pfizer 2003
The Right First Time (RFT) Strategy is key to achieving the PGM Mission: “We will be the world's leading supply organization and an innovative and powerful competitive advantage for Pfizer.”
RFT is a science-based approach that will have a dramatic impact on PGM (Pfizer Global Manufacturing) business performance by transforming our competencies, technologies and ways of working, thereby establishing PGM as the industry benchmark in innovation.
RFT will be fully realized when PGM becomes an agile supply organization driven by highly capable processes and a diverse team of highly engaged colleagues
The target of Right First Time is to enhance the effectiveness of processesThe target of Right First Time is to enhance the effectiveness of processes
13 ©ITEM-HSG
RFT: The 5 priorities
Performance MeasuresAutomation
Value Stream Mapping
Archival Knowledge StorageProcess Analysis Techniques (PAT)
Six Sigma methodsIT Systems (Catalyst and PharmInvestigator)
Launch of new products
RFT Organisation Performance of SuppliersCommunities of Practice
performanceperformance
paradigm shiftparadigm shift
organisational initiatives
organisational initiatives
Risk AssessmentManufacturing Science
Process Capability
process understanding
process understanding
Behaviour of Leader and ValuesCommunication
Method 1Knowledge Management
Relentless Process Focus
colleagues/culture
colleagues/culture
14 ©ITEM-HSG
14
Right First Time Organization
RFT Area Leaders Local Communication & Leadership
Overall StrategySponsors
Global Communication & Leadership
PGM RFT Leader
Local InitiativesCommunicationTrainingLocal Metrics
Implementation
RFT Leaderson Site Level BB + GB + YB
RFT is virtual!RFT directly reports in the line functions!
15 ©ITEM-HSG
RFT Methodology
Topic Method 1
Method 2 Green Belt
Method 3 Black Belt
Method 4
Incidence dissolve simple deviations dissolve deviations dissolve variations decrease rejects improve flow
Problem effectiveness & efficiency effectiveness & efficiency effectiveness & efficiency efficiency Involved Persons
individual initiative or teamwork
teamwork Green Belt
interdisciplinary teams Black Belt
interdisciplinary Teams Green and Black Belts
Necessary Skills basic knowledge of tools for problem solving
Specialization in methodology
standardized and certified training supervisors
standardized and certified training supervisors
Special reason yes yes no no General reason no no yes no Complexity low mid-high very complex mid-high Specific Tools problem definition
process mapping cause & effect brainstorming timing diagram pareto diagram control diagrams
Method 1 and capacity index frequency diagrams Gauge R&R
Method 2 and hypothesis testing regression analysis design of experiments
Method 3 and value stream
mapping value analysis establish flow cell design standard work failure proofing 5S + Visual
Workplace setup reduction total productive
maintenance material flow (Pull) expected value flow
Examples accounting quality deviations bottlenecks in
production
recurring failures, loss of production
loss of revisions
return maintenance glass particles in
sterile products
capacity problems OEE-improvement high stocks cycle times
16 ©ITEM-HSG
Agenda
Models & Patterns of OPEX programs1
The Cultural Challenge 2
Summary3
17 ©ITEM-HSG
The Key influencing Factors for a sustainable Implementation of OE
General Plant Culture
Understanding of OE initiative
Linkage to daily jobProject Mgt.
Project Portfolio Mgt.
Integration of corporate initiatives
Implementation of OE into the Organization
Site Leader
Interplay
OE leader
TrainingPlant Identity
Project Selection
Mgt. Engagement Understanding
Knowledge Mgt.
Communication
Problem – Method Matching
Belt Selection
Plant Mgt. of OE
Identity of OE program
Sponsor Commitment
Usage of OE language
18 ©ITEM-HSG
Management Commitment
Circle of Key Influencing Factors
1
Structure
2
People
3Processes
4
Integration
5
Culture
6Heritage
Corp. commit-ment & support
Management Commitment
Structure
People
Processes
Integration
Culture
1
6
5
4
3
Operational Excellence
2
20 ©ITEM-HSG
Basic Categories of Model
Site Culture/Background
ManagementCommitment
Structure Processes People
Integration
Culture
Corporate Commitment / Support
21 ©ITEM-HSG
„Tension Lines“ for Evaluation of Sites
Extreme 1 Extreme 2
hinders asustainable OEimplementation
fosters asustainable OEimplementation
22 ©ITEM-HSG
I. Site Culture / Background
23 ©ITEM-HSG
Site Culture / Background
Command & Control-
hierarchical
Open, culture of discussion, flat
hierarchy, Process Management
Functional and hierarchical
barriers lead to islands/silos
Problem orien-tation leads to
cross-functional discussions
Management Style
24 ©ITEM-HSG
II. Corporate Commitment / Support
25 ©ITEM-HSG
No Corporate/OpU resources available
Corp./OpUresources availablein case of
emergency
Corp./OpU resources
available on request
Corp./OpU resourcesavailable- whenthey are needed
Corporate/OpU Resources for OE
No linkLinked to main
strategic objectives
Indirectly linked
to objectives
Linked, but not always to the most critical
objectives
OE Aligned/Supportive of Site Objectives
26 ©ITEM-HSG
Not engaged Highly engaged, high number of site visits
Average number of site visits
Low number of site visits
Engagement of OpU/Corporate Support People
27 ©ITEM-HSG
III. Management Commitment
28 ©ITEM-HSG
Not involved in Site
Strategy Setting
Fully involved in Site Strategy Setting
Delivers inputs for Site Strategy
Setting
Partly involvedin Site Strategy
Setting
OE Site Leader
Relationship between Site MD and OE Leader
Contradictory, Not the same agenda
Complementary, completly aligned,
synergistic
Different positions on
several strategic issues
Different positions on
several tactical issues
Commitment of Site Managing Director
Low CommitmentHigh Commitment,
proactive promotion of OE
Focus on mimimal
fulfillment of OE-objectives
Shows Support for OE projects
29 ©ITEM-HSG
Not engaged and commited
Engaged and highly Commited- engaged
with projects
Majority of the SLT engaged and highly commited
Minority of the SLT engaged and highly commited
Commitment of Site Leadership Team (SLT)
Management of OE
Managed as me-too
initiative
Managed as an integrated, strategic
initiative
Managed as a relevantInitiative
Managed as an important initiative
30 ©ITEM-HSG
Understanding of Middle Management
Level of OE Project Sponsors
OE seen as unrelated to them
OE seen as strategic and vital to their
success
OE seen as important but not necessarily
for them
OE seen as technical- somewhat
narrow focus
Middle management
or lowerMember of SLT
Partially member of the
SLT
In most cases member of SLT
31 ©ITEM-HSG
OE only mentioned at
some dedicated events
Structured and well executed
communication strategy
Communication doesn`t reach
shop floor level
Communication takes place on
all levels
Communication
OE and Plant Objectives
No linkLinked to main
objectives and part of
a clear site vision
Indirectly linked
to objectives
Linked to less important objectives
32 ©ITEM-HSG
Selection criteriais availability of
person
Selection criteriais leadership
potential
Selection Criteria is interest
Selection criteria is capability
Black Belt Selection Criterias
Selection criteriais availability
Selection criteriais leadership
potential
Selection Criteria is interest
Selection criteria is capability
Green Belt Selection Criterias
33 ©ITEM-HSG
IV. Structure / Organization
34 ©ITEM-HSG
almost 0% 100%less than 50% more than 50%
Available Working Time of Site OE Leader for OE
Organizational Integration of OE at Site
Integrated in existing
Function:no site-wide level OE role
Created a new dedicated position
for OE & also embedded in functions
...
35 ©ITEM-HSG
no SC SLT leads SCOnly formal
existence of SC
Single members of SLT are
engaged in the SC
OE Steering Committee
There is no celebration of
achievements at all
Achievements are celebrated
systematically
Achievements are
communicated with posters
There is a team event for each
successful closure of a
project
OE Achievements
36 ©ITEM-HSG
V. People
37 ©ITEM-HSG
Technical methodology not seen as applicable
at shop floor
focus on support ofcompetitiveness
helps to solve single
problems
Makes daily work easier
and more efficient
Understanding of OE on Shop Floor Level
Limited to one function
Spread to all functions
Limited to few functions
Spread tomost
functions
Spread of Projects over Organization
38 ©ITEM-HSG
Training (1) Workforce Knowledge of OE
100% trained inbasic understanding
of OE
Adequate number
of green and black belts
50% trainedin basic under-standing of OE
No OE specific
trainings
Training (2) Role of Training
Seen as technical and project related
Seen as means to start
a change ofmindset
Mainly seen as technical, but also
engagement related
Seen as an enabler for
engagement
39 ©ITEM-HSG
VI. Process
40 ©ITEM-HSG
projects are only started with
pressure from outside
projects are started regularly from inside and get finished on
time
projects are regularly
started, but often lose
momentum
projects are regularly started from inside and finished in most
cases
OE Project Engagement
Standardization of Project Management- Include capture ofbusiness benefits
No defined processDisciplined project
management across Site- advanced benefits
captured
not explictly defined process-
some benefits identified
Key Projects chartered &
benefits captured
41 ©ITEM-HSG
ReactiveProactive by realbusiness needs
Most projects started reactive, in single cases
they were generated proactive
Awareness of business needs
drives most projects, project pipeline is well
filled
Project Selection
Knowledge Exchange
Re-invent theWheel
Replicate & improve is our DNA
Unsystematic use of Know
How exchange
Systematic use of Know How
Exchange
Team Work
There’s no realteam work in
our OE activities
Results are achievedbecause of a real team
effort and excellent coaching
Results are achieved because of the efforts of a
few
Results are achieved because
of a real team effort
42 ©ITEM-HSG
VII. Integration
43 ©ITEM-HSG
OE as burdento daily job
OE as improvementof daily job
neutral towardsdaily job
OE as support of daily job
Link to Daily Job
Aligment of OE with other operations initiatives
Managed as contra-
dicting activities
Managed -fully integrated
Managed as separate activities
Managed as comple-mentary activities
There is no senseof responsibility
People closest tothe job take overresponsibility for
improvement
Black Belts feelresponsible for
outcomes
Black Belts andGreen Belts feel
responsible
Sense of responsibility
44 ©ITEM-HSG
Two sites compared
Site Culture / Background
ManagementCommitment
Structure Processes People
Integration
Culture
Corporate Commitment / Support
Site A Site B
Site Culture / Background
ManagementCommitment
Structure Processes People
Integration
Culture
Corporate Commitment / Support
Good level for sustainable OE implementation achieved
On the way
Room for improvement
Low level
45 ©ITEM-HSG
Agenda
Models & Patterns1
Example2
Summary3
46 ©ITEM-HSG
Some generalized conclusions concerning OE! For the initialization of OE an outside (e.g. corporate) support and pressure
is mandatory!
Next will be to gain the management commitment to OE at eachsite!
Project Selection has to be aligned to real needs from the beginning to ensure acceptance for OE!
To make OE sustainable a broad engagement of people has to take place – OE can‘t be ordered!
Structural/organizational measures can enforce the impact and help to communicate the importance of OE!
Make use of quick wins to bring in actively more people!
Communication is key – but communicate the right things!
Training is not only enabling people on the tool side of OE but also an important means to gain understanding and to implement a common language throughout the organization!
47 ©ITEM-HSG
The "Integra
ted Operatio
ns System"
phase
Operational Practices &
Tools
Innovation and Change
Management
Managerial and HR-based
Practices
Training Program
Quality System and Process
Control
QbD and CoDevelopment Upstream integration CoDevelopment products,
processes, and equipment are developed simultaneously and linkages are addressed to gain further improvements
Decentralized brain, and leaders become teachers Leaders become
coaches and teachers Work line operators
are expected to run reactive root cause analysis and to pro-active challenge their standardized work routines
The decentralized brain starts to spread its impact
Beyond the Tools Bundled under one umbrella program
Continuous improvement is seen as a specific mindset to challenge daily routines on every level of the company
New Training Concepts Focus on
understanding, but also on applying, leading and teaching.
New concepts like "Learn Factories" and "Study Tours" partially replace older lecture sessions
Continuous Improvement
Innovations and changes occur continuously on different level.
Senior Management and Site Leadership Teams give direction and ensure the conditions.
Change pattern: Freeze – Rebalance -
Unfreeze
Future State: The „Integrated Operations System“ phase
Source: Friedli et al. - Pathway to Operational Excellence (2010)
48 ©ITEM-HSG
The need for integration in next-level OPEX approaches
Align all intended initiatives with your corporate strategy and communicate the “why” of the initiative !
Establish a comprehensive reference model of your production system !
Establish a support structure on site level !
Establish a comprehensive management system for the improvement activities !
Establish a standardized process for the selection of improvement projects !
Establish a high level committee at the site !
Be precise about what kind of "Management Commitment" is needed !
Form a community of practices for Operational Excellence with outside experts and corporate management personnel !
Make sure that most of the available time of the people with responsibilities is spend where the action is and not behind their desks !
49 ©ITEM-HSG
Our 2nd OPEX Book "Pathway to Operational Excellence"
The follow-up to our first OPEX Book in 2006 Bringing together academia's research and
companies' experiences in one book Leading company representatives describe and
explain their OPEX programs in-depth, discuss successful practices and challenges
For example: - Pfizer- Wyeth- Novartis- Genentech- MerckSerono
Book Structure:I. IntroductionII. Starting Point of Our JourneyIII. Maps and ExperiencesIV. Exploring the LandscapeV. Redefining the Destination
Visit: www.opexbenchmarking.com
50 ©ITEM-HSG
Prof. Dr. Thomas FriedliManaging DirectorChair of Production ManagementDufourstrasse 40aCH - 9000 St. Gallen
www.tectem.unisg.chwww.globalmanufacturingnetworks.com